Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Article
  • Published:

Century-scale carbon sequestration flux throughout the ocean by the biological pump

Abstract

The ocean contains about 40 times more carbon than the atmosphere, storing 38,000 Pg C as dissolved inorganic carbon (DIC) versus 900 Pg C as carbon dioxide (CO2) in the present atmosphere. The biological carbon pump contributes to ocean carbon storage by moving organic carbon out of the surface ocean into deeper waters in sinking particles, vertically migrating organisms and physical circulation. Century-scale (≥100 years) storage of the resulting biogenic DIC is commonly assumed to occur exclusively in the deep ocean, typically below 1,000 m. However, recent work has shown that carbon can be sequestered at century scales above 1,000 m in many ocean regions, in what we call ‘continuous vertical sequestration’. Here we calculate the century-scale carbon sequestration flux driven by the biological pump throughout the water column by combining previously published estimates of organic carbon flux and modelled values of water-mass sequestration time distributions. We estimate that the flux of organic carbon that is sequestered for ≥100 years in the contemporary ocean by the combined action of various biological pump pathways is 0.9–2.6 Pg C yr−1, which is up to six times larger than previous estimates based on the organic carbon flux reaching the deep ocean.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Fig. 1: Schematic illustration of continuous vertical sequestration (CONVERSE) fluxes driven by the biological pump.
Fig. 2: Geographic and vertical distributions of the fraction of a water parcel that will remain in the ocean for ≥100 years (f100).
Fig. 3: Schematic illustration of the carbon export and sequestration mechanisms of the biological pump.
Fig. 4: Vertical profiles of Fremin, f100 and the resulting Fseq for POC and cumulative Fseq from surface to depth, in four ocean regions representative of different ocean conditions.
Fig. 5: Sequestration fluxes of biogenic carbon Fseq in CONVERSE versions 1, 2 and 4.

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

The f100 values are available at https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.15228690.v2. The SIMPLE-TRIM values are available at https://tdevries.eri.ucsb.edu/models-and-data-products/ under the SIMPLE-TRIM output. These include the values that we used to compute the POC Fexp data that we used to calculate sequestration fluxes in CONVERSE 4–5 and produce Extended Data Fig. 2b. The POC Fexp data that we used to calculate sequestration fluxes in CONVERSE 1–3, 6 and 7 and produce Extended Data Fig. 2a were kindly provided by S. Henson14 and are publicly available at Zenodo (https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8355514). The values of long-term burial fluxes of total organic carbon in world-ocean sediment (which we call FTOC) are available in the zip folder 2020GB006769-sup-0002-Supporting Information SI-S02.7z (ref. 43), where we use the following netCDFs: TOCConc1degR.nc and F_TOCMapR3.nc.

Code availability

The codes for the data analysis were developed by F. Ricour. They can be accessed at GitHub (https://github.com/fricour/CONVERSE) and are publicly available at the Zenodo repository (https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8355514).

References

  1. Siegel, D. A., DeVries, T., Cetinić, I. & Bisson, K. M. Quantifying the ocean’s biological pump and its carbon cycle impacts on global scales. Annu. Rev. Mar. Sci. 15, 329–356 (2023).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Iversen, M. H. Carbon export in the ocean: a biologist’s perspective. Annu. Rev. Mar. Sci. 15, 357–381 (2023).

  3. Wilson, J. D. et al. The biological carbon pump in CMIP6 models: 21st century trends and uncertainties. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 119, e2204369119 (2022).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. DeVries, T. & Weber, T. The export and fate of organic matter in the ocean: new constraints from combining satellite and oceanographic tracer observations. Global Biogeochem. Cycles 31, 535–555 (2017).

  5. Siegel, D. A. et al. Assessing the sequestration time scales of some ocean-based carbon dioxide reduction strategies. Environ. Res. Lett. 16, 104003 (2021).

  6. Baker, C. A., Martin, A. P., Yool, A. & Popova, E. Biological carbon pump sequestration efficiency in the north Atlantic: a leaky or a long‐term sink? Global Biogeochem. Cycles 36, e2021GB007286 (2022).

  7. Weyer, N. M. in IPCC Special Report on the Ocean and Cryosphere in a Changing Climate (eds Pörtner, H.-O. et al.) 677–702 (Cambridge Univ. Press, 2019).

  8. Lampitt, R. S. et al. Ocean fertilization: a potential means of geoengineering? Phil. Trans. R. Soc. A 366, 3919–3945 (2008).

  9. Passow, U. & Carlson, C. The biological pump in a high CO2 world. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 470, 249–271 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Weber, T., Cram, J. A., Leung, S. W., DeVries, T. & Deutsch, C. Deep ocean nutrients imply large latitudinal variation in particle transfer efficiency. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 113, 8606–8611 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Boyd, P. W., Claustre, H., Levy, M., Siegel, D. A. & Weber, T. Multi-faceted particle pumps drive carbon sequestration in the ocean. Nature 568, 327–335 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. National Academies of Sciences. A Research Strategy for Ocean-based Carbon Dioxide Removal and Sequestration (National Academies Press, 2022); https://doi.org/10.17226/26278

  13. Honjo, S., Manganini, S. J., Krishfield, R. A. & Francois, R. Particulate organic carbon fluxes to the ocean interior and factors controlling the biological pump: a synthesis of global sediment trap programs since 1983. Prog. Oceanogr. 76, 217–285 (2008).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Henson, S. A., Sanders, R. & Madsen, E. Global patterns in efficiency of particulate organic carbon export and transfer to the deep ocean. Global Biogeochem. Cycles https://doi.org/10.1029/2011GB004099 (2012).

  15. Robinson, J. et al. How deep is deep enough? Ocean iron fertilization and carbon sequestration in the Southern Ocean. Geophys. Res. Lett. 41, 2489–2495 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Legendre, L., Rivkin, R. B., Weinbauer, M. G., Guidi, L. & Uitz, J. The microbial carbon pump concept: potential biogeochemical significance in the globally changing ocean. Prog. Oceanogr. 134, 432–450 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Guidi, L. et al. A new look at ocean carbon remineralization for estimating deepwater sequestration. Global Biogeochem. Cycles 29, 1044–1059 (2015).

  18. Cram, J. A. et al. The role of particle size, ballast, temperature and oxygen in the sinking flux to the deep sea. Global Biogeochem. Cycles 32, 858–876 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Nowicki, M., DeVries, T. & Siegel, D. A. Quantifying the carbon export and sequestration pathways of the ocean’s biological carbon pump. Global Biogeochem. Cycles 36, e2021GB007083 (2022).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Alldredge, A. L. & Gotschalk, C. C. Direct observations of the mass flocculation of diatom blooms: characteristics, settling velocities and formation of diatom aggregates. Deep Sea Res. 36, 159–171 (1989).

  21. Turner, J. T. Zooplankton fecal pellets, marine snow, phytodetritus and the ocean’s biological pump. Prog. Oceanogr. 130, 205–248 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Dunne, J. P., Sarmiento, J. L. & Gnanadesikan, A. A synthesis of global particle export from the surface ocean and cycling through the ocean interior and on the seafloor. Global Biogeochem. Cycles https://doi.org/10.1029/2006GB002907 (2007).

  23. Dall’Olmo, G., Dingle, J., Polimene, L., Brewin, R. J. W. & Claustre, H. Substantial energy input to the mesopelagic ecosystem from the seasonal mixed-layer pump. Nat. Geosci. 9, 820–823 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Omand, M. M. et al. Eddy-driven subduction exports particulate organic carbon from the spring bloom. Science 348, 222–225 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Resplandy, L., Lévy, M. & McGillicuddy, D. J. Jr. Effects of eddy‐driven subduction on ocean biological carbon pump. Global Biogeochem. Cycles 33, 1071–1084 (2019).

  26. Hansell, D., Carlson, C., Repeta, D. & Schlitzer, R. Dissolved organic matter in the ocean: a controversy stimulates new insights. Oceanography 22, 202–211 (2009).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Liu, L. L. & Huang, R. X. The global subduction/obduction rates: their interannual and decadal variability. J. Clim. 25, 1096–1115 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Levy, M. et al. Physical pathways for carbon transfers between the surface mixed layer and the ocean interior. Global Biogeochem. Cycles 27, 1001–1012 (2013).

  29. Bianchi, D., Stock, C., Galbraith, E. D. & Sarmiento, J. L. Diel vertical migration: ecological controls and impacts on the biological pump in a one-dimensional ocean model. Global Biogeochem. Cycles 27, 478–491 (2013).

  30. Aumont, O., Maury, O., Lefort, S. & Bopp, L. Evaluating the potential impacts of the diurnal vertical migration by marine organisms on marine biogeochemistry. Global Biogeochem. Cycles 32, 1622–1643 (2018).

  31. Hansell, D. A. Recalcitrant dissolved organic carbon fractions. Ann. Rev. Mar. Sci. 5, 421–445 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Jiao, N. et al. Microbial production of recalcitrant dissolved organic matter: long-term carbon storage in the global ocean. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 8, 593–599 (2010).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Jiao, N. et al. The microbial carbon pump and the oceanic recalcitrant dissolved organic matter pool. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 9, 555 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Archibald, K. M., Siegel, D. A. & Doney, S. C. Modeling the impact of zooplankton Diel vertical migration on the carbon export flux of the biological pump. Global Biogeochem. Cycles 33, 181–199 (2019).

  35. Brun, P. et al. Climate change has altered zooplankton-fuelled carbon export in the North Atlantic. Nat. Ecol. Evol. 3, 416–423 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Jónasdóttir, S. H., Visser, A. W., Richardson, K. & Heath, M. R. Seasonal copepod lipid pump promotes carbon sequestration in the deep North Atlantic. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 112, 12122–12126 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Auel, H., Klages, M. & Werner, I. Respiration and lipid content of the Arctic copepod Calanus hyperboreus overwintering 1 m above the seafloor at 2,300 m water depth in the Fram Strait. Mar. Biol. 143, 275–282 (2003).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Hirche, H. J., Muyakshin, S., Klages, M. & Auel, H. Aggregation of the Arctic copepod Calanus hyperboreus over the ocean floor of the Greenland Sea. Deep Sea Res. 53, 310–320 (2006).

  39. Visser, A. W., Grønning, J. & Jónasdóttir, S. H. Calanus hyperboreus and the lipid pump. Limnol. Oceanogr. 62, 1155–1165 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Martin, J. H., Knauer, G. A., Karl, D. M. & Broenkow, W. W. VERTEX: carbon cycling in the northeast Pacific. Deep Sea Res. 34, 267–285 (1987).

  41. Holzer, M., DeVries, T. & de Lavergne, C. Diffusion controls the ventilation of a Pacific Shadow Zone above abyssal overturning. Nat. Commun. 12, 4348 (2021).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Henson, S. A. et al. Uncertain response of ocean biological carbon export in a changing world. Nat. Geosci. 15, 248–254 (2022).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Hayes, C. T. et al. Global ocean sediment composition and burial flux in the deep sea. Global Biogeochem. Cycles 35, e2020GB006769 (2021).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Claustre, H., Legendre, L., Boyd, P. W. & Levy, M. The oceans’ biological carbon pumps: framework for a research observational community approach. Front. Mar. Sci. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmars.2021.780052 (2021).

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank L. Prieur for his calculations for early versions of the manuscript and numerous suggestions, and G. Reygondeau for his contributions to early versions. We are grateful to S. Henson14 for providing us with her data for POC Fexp. We also thank S. Huld Jónasdóttir and A. Visser for additional information on values in their 2015 paper36. This work was supported by the Fonds de la Recherche Scientifique (FNRS) of Belgium (F.R.). L.G. and M.G. have received funding from the European Union’s Horizon 2020 Research and Innovation Programme under grant no. 862923. T.D. acknowledges support from NASA award 80NSSC22K0155. This output reflects only the authors’ views, and the European Union cannot be held responsible for any use that may be made of the information contained herein.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

L.G. and L.L. conceived the initial project, with advice from T.D. F.R. performed data curation. F.R. and L.L. conducted the modelling and analyses, and wrote the manuscript with inputs from L.G., T.D. and M.G. All authors discussed and contributed intellectually to interpretation of the results.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Florian Ricour or Louis Legendre.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Peer review

Peer review information

Nature Geoscience thanks Jamie Wilson and the other, anonymous, reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work. Primary Handling Editor: James Super, in collaboration with the Nature Geoscience team.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Extended data

Extended Data Fig. 1 Global-ocean distributions of f100 at six selected depths.

White areas: pixels with water depths shallower than the depth illustrated. Some of the same f100 distributions and additional ones can be found in Supplemental Fig. S2 of another publication5.

Extended Data Fig. 2 Global distributions of POC Fexp at zexp = 100 m used in this study.

Corresponding global POC Fexp: (a) 3.0 Pg C y−1, from the original publication14 (excluding the pixels without f100 values at 100 m; white areas in panel b) based on 234T-derived field measurements collated from the literature; and (b) 7.3 Pg C y−1, corrected from the published4 6.7 Pg C y−1 calculated using a model in which euphotic-zone biological processes were driven by satellite data and which assimilated ocean tracer observations.

Extended Data Fig. 3 Sequestration fluxes of biogenic carbon in CONVERSE 1-3.

Geographic distributions of (ad) carbon pump Fseq, (e) Fseq into the sediment, and Fseq calculated at zseq of (f) 1000 m and (g) 2000 m (assuming entire sequestration of the POC flux below zseq). The latter two are the total sequestration fluxes estimated in many studies. Ocean areas shallower than 100 m are without colour. The seasonal migrant pump is not illustrated because our results concern the sole northern North Atlantic. Corresponding results are in Extended Data Tables 3 and 5.

Extended Data Fig. 4 Sequestration fluxes of biogenic carbon in CONVERSE 4, 5 and 7.

Geographic distributions of (ad) carbon pump Fseq, (e) Fseq into the sediment, and Fseq calculated at zseq of (f) 1000 m and (g) 2000 m (assuming entire sequestration of the POC flux below zseq). The latter two are the total sequestration fluxes estimated in many studies. Ocean areas shallower than 100 m are without colour. The seasonal migrant pump is not illustrated because our results concern the sole northern North Atlantic. Corresponding results are in Extended Data Tables 4 and 5.

Extended Data Table 1 Acronyms and symbols used in the main text
Extended Data Table 2 Characteristics of the seven versions of CONVERSE Fremin estimates for POC, DOC, vertical migrations, and sediment
Extended Data Table 3 Estimates of sequestration fluxes (Fseq, Pg C y−1) in the whole water column corresponding to seven versions characterized by different sequestration depths (CONVERSE, or zseq), b and Fexp at 100 m (same zexp = 100 m), calculated in this study (CONVERSE) or taken from previously published works
Extended Data Table 4 Estimates of sequestration fluxes (Fseq, Pg C y−1) in the whole water column calculated in this study, corresponding to four CONVERSE versions characterized by different zexp, calculations of FseqDOC and Fexp
Extended Data Table 5 Estimates of sequestration fluxes (Fseq, Pg C y−1) at, below and above 1,000 m and 2,000 m calculated in this study, corresponding to CONVERSE 1-7, the characteristics of which are given in Extended Data Tables 24

Supplementary information

Supplementary Information

Supplementary Sections 1–6, Tables 1 and 2, Methods and references.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ricour, F., Guidi, L., Gehlen, M. et al. Century-scale carbon sequestration flux throughout the ocean by the biological pump. Nat. Geosci. 16, 1105–1113 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41561-023-01318-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41561-023-01318-9

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing