Abstract
Photovoltaic power conversion using polycrystalline light-absorbing semiconductors enables low-cost electricity generation. Cu(In,Ga)Se2 (CIGS) are among the best performing thin-film solar cells with notable recent improvements upon an alkali-fluoride (AlkF) post-deposition treatment (PDT). Here we show that the success of this treatment can be hampered by spatial inhomogeneities in the conductivity. We apply an emerging conductive atomic force microscopy (C-AFM) tomography technique and obtain three-dimensional conductivity maps, enabling imaging of the carrier concentration grain by grain on the submicrometre scale. We find that a solar cell with KF PDT shows a stronger inhomogeneity of charge-carrier concentration, while RbF and CsF lead to narrow distributions at higher charge-carrier concentrations. The CIGS charge-carrier concentration and its homogeneity influence directly the open-circuit voltage of solar cells, thereby impacting device performance. Our insights support the development of higher efficiency thin-film photovoltaics through optimized AlkF PDTs. Moreover, the C-AFM tomography method is widely applicable to energy materials.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Access options
Access Nature and 54 other Nature Portfolio journals
Get Nature+, our best-value online-access subscription
$29.99 / 30 days
cancel any time
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 12 digital issues and online access to articles
$119.00 per year
only $9.92 per issue
Buy this article
- Purchase on Springer Link
- Instant access to full article PDF
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
Similar content being viewed by others
Data availability
Source data are provided with this paper. All other datasets generated and analysed in the present study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.
References
Green, M. A. et al. Solar cell efficiency tables (version 59). Prog. Photovoltaics Res. Appl. 30, 3–12 (2022).
Zhang, L. et al. Effect of copassivation of Cl and Cu on CdTe grain boundaries. Phys. Rev. Lett. 101, 155501 (2008).
Poplawsky, J. D. et al. Direct imaging of Cl- and Cu-induced short-circuit efficiency changes in CdTe solar cells. Adv. Energy Mater. 4, 1400454 (2014).
Alberi, K. et al. Measuring long-range carrier diffusion across multiple grains in polycrystalline semiconductors by photoluminescence imaging. Nat. Commun. 4, 2699 (2013).
Shao, Y., Xiao, Z., Bi, C., Yuan, Y. & Huang, J. Origin and elimination of photocurrent hysteresis by fullerene passivation in CH3NH3PbI3 planar heterojunction solar cells. Nat. Commun. 5, 5784 (2014).
Zhang, W., Eperon, G. E. & Snaith, H. J. Metal halide perovskites for energy applications. Nat. Energy 1, 16048 (2016).
DeQuilettes, D. W. et al. Impact of microstructure on local carrier lifetime in perovskite solar cells. Science 348, 683–686 (2015).
Zuo, L. et al. Polymer-modified halide perovskite films for efficient and stable planar heterojunction solar cells. Sci. Adv. 3, e1700106 (2017).
Nicoara, N. et al. Direct evidence for grain boundary passivation in Cu(In,Ga)Se2 solar cells through alkali-fluoride post-deposition treatments. Nat. Commun. 10, 3980 (2019).
Siebentritt, S. et al. Heavy alkali treatment of Cu(In,Ga)Se2 solar cells: surface versus bulk effects. Adv. Energy Mater. 10, 1903752 (2020).
Cojocaru-Mirédin, O., Raghuwanshi, M., Wuerz, R. & Sadewasser, S. Grain boundaries in Cu(In,Ga)Se2: a review on composition–electronic property relationships by atom probe tomography and correlative microscopy. Adv. Funct. Mater. 31, 2103119 (2021).
Chirilă, A. et al. Potassium-induced surface modification of Cu(In,Ga)Se2 thin films for high-efficiency solar cells. Nat. Mater. 12, 1107–1111 (2013).
Jackson, P., Hariskos, D., Wuerz, R., Wischmann, W. & Powalla, M. Compositional investigation of potassium doped Cu(In,Ga)Se2 solar cells with efficiencies up to 20.8%. Phys. Status Solidi Rapid Res. Lett. 8, 219–222 (2014).
Ochoa, M., Yang, S.-C., Nishiwaki, S., Tiwari, A. N. & Carron, R. Charge carrier lifetime fluctuations and performance evaluation of Cu(In,Ga)Se2 absorbers via time-resolved-photoluminescence microscopy. Adv. Energy Mater. 12, 2102800 (2022).
Pianezzi, F. et al. Unveiling the effects of post-deposition treatment with different alkaline elements on the electronic properties of CIGS thin-film solar cells. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 16, 8843–8851 (2014).
Lin, T.-Y. et al. Alkali-induced grain boundary reconstruction on Cu(In,Ga)Se2 thin-film solar cells using cesium fluoride post-deposition treatment. Nano Energy 69, 104299 (2020).
Laemmle, A., Wuerz, R. & Powalla, M. Efficiency enhancement of Cu(In,Ga)Se2 thin-film solar cells by a post-deposition treatment with potassium fluoride. Phys. Status Solidi Rapid Res. Lett. 7, 631–634 (2013).
Laemmle, A. et al. Investigation of the diffusion behavior of sodium in Cu(In,Ga)Se2 layers. J. Appl. Phys. 115, 154501 (2014).
Vilalta-Clemente, A. et al. Rubidium distribution at atomic scale in high efficient Cu(In,Ga)Se2 thin-film solar cells. Appl. Phys. Lett. 112, 103105 (2018).
Schöppe, P. et al. Overall distribution of rubidium in highly efficient Cu(In,Ga)Se2 solar cells. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 10, 40592–40598 (2018).
Stokes, A., Al-Jassim, M., Diercks, D., Clarke, A. & Gorman, B. Impact of wide-ranging nanoscale chemistry on band structure at Cu(In,Ga)Se2 grain boundaries. Sci. Rep. 7, 14163 (2017).
Raghuwanshi, M. et al. Influence of RbF post-deposition treatment on heterojunction and grain boundaries in high efficient (21.1%) Cu(In,Ga)Se2 solar cells. Nano Energy 60, 103–110 (2019).
Sadewasser, S. & Glatzel, T. (eds) Kelvin Probe Force Microscopy—Measuring and Compensating Electrostatic Forces (Springer, 2012).
Hui, F. & Lanza, M. Scanning probe microscopy for advanced nanoelectronics. Nat. Electron. 2, 221–229 (2019).
Celano, U. et al. Mesoscopic physical removal of material using sliding nanodiamond contacts. Sci. Rep. 8, 2994 (2018).
Luria, F. et al. Charge transport in CdTe solar cells revealed by conductive tomographic atomic force microscopy. Nat. Energy 1, 16150 (2016).
Song, J., Zhou, Y., Padture, N. P. & Huey, B. D. Anomalous 3D nanoscale photoconduction in hybrid perovskite semiconductors revealed by tomographic atomic force microscopy. Nat. Commun. 11, 3308 (2020).
Chintala, R. C. et al. Nanoscale 3D characterisation of soft organic material using conductive scanning probe tomography. AIP Adv. 9, 025105 (2019).
Hertz, H. On the contact of elastic solids. J. Reine Angew. Math. 92, 156–171 (1881).
Johnson, K. L., Kendall, K. & Roberts, A. D. Surface energy and the contact of elastic solids. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A 324, 301–313 (1971).
Derjaguin, B. V., Muller, V. M. & Toporov, Y. P. Effect of contact deformations on the adhesion of particles. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 53, 314–326 (1975).
Adams G. G. in Encyclopedia of Tribology (eds Wang, Q. J. & Chung, Y. W.) 3560–3565 (Springer, 2013).
Nanosensors. NanoAndMore USA https://www.nanoandmore.com/AFM-Probe-CDT-NCHR (2022).
Clarysse, T., Vanhaeren, D., Hoflijk, I. & Vandervorst, W. Characterization of electrically active dopant profiles with the spreading resistance probe. Mater. Sci. Eng. R 47, 123–206 (2004).
Jensen, S. A. et al. Beneficial effect of post-deposition treatment in high-efficiency Cu(In,Ga)Se2 solar cells through reduced potential fluctuations. J. Appl. Phys. 120, 063106 (2016).
Khatri, I., Fukai, H., Yamaguchi, H., Sugiyama, M. & Nakada, T. Effect of potassium fluoride post-deposition treatment on Cu(In,Ga)Se2 thin films and solar cells fabricated onto sodalime glass substrates. Sol. Energy Mater. Sol. Cells 155, 280–287 (2016).
Karki, S. et al. Analysis of recombination mechanisms in RbF treated CIGS solar cells. IEEE J. Photovoltaics 9, 313–318 (2019).
Kodalle, T. et al. Elucidating the mechanism of an RbF post-deposition treatment in CIGS thin-film solar cells. Sol. RRL 2, 1800156 (2018).
Ishizuka, S. & Fons, P. J. Role of the Cu-deficient interface in Cu(In,Ga)Se2 thin-film photovoltaics with alkali-metal doping. Phys. Rev. Appl. 15, 054005 (2021).
Lin, T.-Y. et al. Alkali-induced grain boundary reconstruction on Cu(In,Ga)Se2 thin-film solar cells using cesium fluoride post-deposition treatment. Nano Energy 68, 104299 (2020).
Burgelman, M., Nollet, P. & Degrave, S. Modelling polycrystalline semiconductor solar cells. Thin Solid Films 361–362, 527–532 (2000).
Jackson, P. et al. Effects of heavy alkali elements in Cu(In,Ga)Se2 solar cells with efficiencies up to 22.6%. Phys. Status Solidi Rapid Res. Lett. 10, 583–586 (2016).
Jackson, P. et al. Properties of Cu(In,Ga)Se2 solar cells with new record efficiencies up to 21.7%. Phys. Status Solidi Rapid Res. Lett. 9, 28–31 (2015).
Nakamura, M. et al. Cd-free Cu(In,Ga)(Se,S)2 thin-film solar cell with record efficiency of 23.35%. IEEE J. Photovoltaics 9, 1863–1867 (2019).
Sozzi, G. et al. Influence of conduction band offsets at window/buffer and buffer/absorber interfaces on the roll-over of J–V curves of CIGS solar cells. In 44th Photovoltaic Specialist Conference 2205–2208 (IEEE, 2017).
Frisk, C. et al. Optimizing Ga-profiles for highly efficient Cu(In, Ga)Se2 thin-film solar cells in simple and complex defect models. J. Phys. D 47, 485104 (2014).
Spear, K. E. & Dismukes, J. P. (eds) Synthetic Diamond: Emerging CVD Science and Technology Vol. 25 (John Wiley & Sons, 1994).
Buzás, A. & Geretovszky, Z. Nanosecond laser-induced selective removal of the active layer of CuInGaSe2 solar cells by stress-assisted ablation. Phys. Rev. B 85, 245304 (2012).
Gerthoffer, A. et al. CIGS solar cells on ultra-thin glass substrates: determination of mechanical properties by nanoindentation and application to bending-induced strain calculation. Sol. Energy Mater. Sol. Cells 166, 254–261 (2017).
Acknowledgements
The CIGS samples for this work were prepared as part of the project Sharc25, funded through the European Union’s Horizon 2020 Research and Innovation programme under grant agreement number 641004 (N.N., P.J., W.W., D.H., S.S.). E. Bertin is acknowledged for support in the initial phases of the development of the C-AFM technique on CIGS samples. We thank I. Khatri, D. Colombara and G. Bacher for helpful discussions.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
S.S. and N.N. conceived the study. D.S., N.N. and S.S. developed the experimental methodology and data analysis. D.S. performed the experiments. D.S., N.N. and S.S. performed the data analysis. P.J., W.W. and D.H. prepared the samples. D.S. and S.S. wrote the paper. All authors discussed the results and revised the paper.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Peer review
Peer review information
Nature Energy thanks Bryan Huey and the other, anonymous, reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work.
Additional information
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary information
Supplementary Information
Supplementary Figs. 1–13, Discussions 1 and 2, and Tables 1–5.
Supplementary Video 1
Top view of current maps through RbF PDT CIGS sample from top to bottom of C-AFM tomography experiment.
Supplementary Video 2
Video of vertical slice through the 3D C-AFM current volume for the RbF PDT CIGS sample, illustrating the rich information obtained from C-AFM tomography experiments.
Supplementary Data 1
Source data for Supplementary Fig. 5.
Supplementary Data 2
Source data for Supplementary Fig. 8.
Supplementary Data 3
Source data for Supplementary Fig. 9.
Supplementary Data 4
Source data for Supplementary Fig. 10.
Supplementary Data 5
Source data for Supplementary Fig. 11.
Supplementary Data 6
Source data for Supplementary Fig. 12.
Source data
Source Data Fig. 2
Source data for grains 1–4 and data for fit curves shown in panel b.
Source Data Fig. 5
Statistical source data.
Source Data Fig. 6
Statistical source data.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Sharma, D., Nicoara, N., Jackson, P. et al. Charge-carrier-concentration inhomogeneities in alkali-treated Cu(In,Ga)Se2 revealed by conductive atomic force microscopy tomography. Nat Energy 9, 163–171 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41560-023-01420-7
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41560-023-01420-7
This article is cited by
-
Carrier concentration resolved
Nature Energy (2024)