Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Comment
  • Published:

Uneasy tensions in energy justice and systems transformation

Nature Energy volume 8, pages 317–320 (2023)Cite this article

Subjects

Differences in the approach to community acceptance of energy technologies can muddy visions of energy futures. Acknowledgement of the tensions around justice perspectives and the degree of desired change can improve scholarship and policy dialogue.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Relevant articles

Open Access articles citing this article.

Access options

Buy this article

  • Purchase on Springer Link
  • Instant access to full article PDF
Buy now

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Fig. 1: Visualizing a typology of energy systems change and perspectives on justice.

References

  1. Jenkins, K., McCauley, D., Heffron, R., Stephan, H. & Rehner, R. Energy Res. Soc. Sci. 11, 174–182 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Sovacool, B. K., Heffron, R. J., McCauley, D. & Goldthau, A. Nat. Energy 1, 16024 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. McCauley, D. et al. Appl. Energy 233–234, 916–921 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Wüstenhagen, R., Wolsink, M. & Bürer, M. J. Energy Policy 35, 2683–2691 (2007).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Upham, P., Oltra, C. & Boso, À. Energy Res. Soc. Sci. 8, 100–112 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Bell, D., Gray, T., Haggett, C. & Swaffield, J. Environ. Polit. 22, 115–135 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Devine-Wright, P. Wiley Interdiscip. Rev. Clim. Change 2, 19–26 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Bidwell, D. Energy Policy 58, 189–199 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Sovacool, B. K. & Ratan, P. L. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 16, 5268–5279 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Batel, S. Energy Res. Soc. Sci. 68, 101544 (2020).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Liebe, U., Bartczak, A. & Meyerhoff, J. Energy Policy 107, 300–308 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Liu, L., Bouman, T., Perlaviciute, G. & Steg, L. Energy Clim. Change 1, 100013 (2020).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Cowell, R., Bristow, G. & Munday, M. J. Environ. Plan. Manag. 54, 539–557 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. van Wijk, J., Fischhendler, I., Rosen, G. & Herman, L. Energy Res. Soc. Sci. 81, 102260 (2021).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Walker, G. & Devine-Wright, P. Energy Policy 36, 497–500 (2008).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Strachan, P. A., Cowell, R., Ellis, G., Sherry-Brennan, F. & Toke, D. Sustain. Dev. 23, 96–109 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  17. Lennon, B., Dunphy, N. P. & Sanvicente, E. Energy Sustain. Soc. 9, 35 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Aitken, M. Energy Policy 38, 1834–1841 (2010).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Batel, S. & Devine-Wright, P. Antipode 49, 3–22 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Sovacool, B. K. Energy Res. Soc. Sci. 73, 101916 (2021).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Warren, C. R. & McFadyen, M. Land Use Policy 27, 204–213 (2010).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Wahlund, M. & Palm, J. Energy Res. Soc. Sci. 87, 102482 (2022).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Sovacool, B. K. Technol. Soc. 31, 365–373 (2009).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. van Veelen, B. & van der Horst, D. Energy Res. Soc. Sci. 46, 19–28 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Bell, D., Gray, T. & Haggett, C. Environ. Polit. 14, 460–477 (2005).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Devine-Wright, P. J. Community Appl. Soc. Psychol. 19, 426–441 (2009).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Sovacool, B. K. & Dworkin, M. H. Appl. Energy 142, 435–444 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Heffron, R. J. & McCauley, D. Energy Policy 105, 658–667 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Marine Affairs, University of Rhode Island, Kingston, RI, USA

    David Bidwell

  2. Center for Energy Technologies, Department of Business Development and Technology, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark

    Benjamin K. Sovacool

  3. Science Policy Research Unit (SPRU), University of Sussex Business School, Falmer, Brighton, UK

    Benjamin K. Sovacool

  4. Department of Earth and Environment, Boston University, Boston, MA, USA

    Benjamin K. Sovacool

  5. Institute for Global Sustainability, Boston University, Boston, MA, USA

    Benjamin K. Sovacool

Authors
  1. David Bidwell
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Benjamin K. Sovacool
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to David Bidwell.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Bidwell, D., Sovacool, B.K. Uneasy tensions in energy justice and systems transformation. Nat Energy 8, 317–320 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41560-023-01217-8

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41560-023-01217-8

This article is cited by

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

Nature Briefing Anthropocene

Sign up for the Nature Briefing: Anthropocene newsletter — what matters in anthropocene research, free to your inbox weekly.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing: Anthropocene