Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Increase in frequency of nuclear power outages due to changing climate


Climate-related changes have already affected operating conditions for different types of energy system, in particular power plants. With more than three decades of data on changing climate, we are now in a position to empirically assess the impact of climate change on power plant operations. Such empirical assessments can provide an additional measure of the resilience of power plants going forward. Here I analyse climate-linked outages in nuclear power plants over the past three decades. My assessment shows that the average frequency of climate-induced disruptions has dramatically increased from 0.2 outage per reactor-year in the 1990s to 1.5 in the past decade. Based on the projections for adopted climate scenarios, the average annual energy loss of the global nuclear fleet is estimated to range between 0.8% and 1.4% in the mid-term (2046–2065) and 1.4% and 2.4% in the long term (2081–2100).

Your institute does not have access to this article

Access options

Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.


All prices are NET prices.

Fig. 1: Pathways of climate-induced disruptions in nuclear power plants.
Fig. 2: Variation of the average frequency of NPP outages per decade.
Fig. 3: Characteristics of climate-induced full outages in NPPs between 2010 and 2019.
Fig. 4: Linear regressions of the variations of energy loss and frequency of outages per reactor-year.
Fig. 5: Characteristics of full outages induced by climate-linked events.
Fig. 6: Projected variation of the annual loss of energy due to climate-linked outages.

Data availability

The datasets generated and/or analysed during the current study are not publicly available due to third-party restrictions, but anonymized datasets are available from the author on reasonable request. The publicly available data that was used in this paper can be found on the IAEA Power Reactor Information System (PRIS) database (, and the IAEA Operating Experience with Nuclear Power Stations in Member States (2020 version can be accessed on this link: Source data are provided with this paper.

Code availability

The Python codes that enable the reproduction of the main analysis is available upon reasonable request from the author.


  1. Tong, D. et al. Committed emissions from existing energy infrastructure jeopardize 1.5 °C climate target. Nature 572, 373–377 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Edwards, M. R. & Trancik, J. E. Climate impacts of energy technologies depend on emissions timing. Nat. Clim. Change 4, 347–352 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Davis, S. J. et al. Net-zero emissions energy systems. Science 360, eaas9793 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Sovacool, B. K., Schmid, P., Stirling, A., Walter, G. & MacKerron, G. Differences in carbon emissions reduction between countries pursuing renewable electricity versus nuclear power. Nat. Energy (2020).

  5. Yalew, S. G. et al. Impacts of climate change on energy systems in global and regional scenarios. Nat. Energy 5, 794–802 (2020).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Cronin, J., Anandarajah, G. & Dessens, O. Climate change impacts on the energy system: a review of trends and gaps. Climatic Change 151, 79–93 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Schaeffer, R. et al. Energy sector vulnerability to climate change: a review. Energy 38, 1–12 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Ebinger, J. & Vergara, W. Climate Impacts on Energy Systems: Key Issues for Energy Sector Adaptation (World Bank, 2011);

  9. Jaffe, A. M. et al. Impact of Climate Risk on the Energy System (Council on Foreign Relations, 2019);

  10. Forzieri, G. et al. Escalating impacts of climate extremes on critical infrastructures in Europe. Glob. Environ. Change 48, 97–107 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Bennett, J. A. et al. Extending energy system modelling to include extreme weather risks and application to hurricane events in Puerto Rico. Nat. Energy (2021).

  12. Knapp, V. & Pevec, D. Promises and limitations of nuclear fission energy in combating climate change. Energy Policy 120, 94–99 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Socolow, R. H. & Glaser, A. Balancing risks: nuclear energy & climate change. Daedalus 138, 31–44 (2009).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Kopytko, N. & Perkins, J. Climate change, nuclear power, and the adaptation–mitigation dilemma. Energy Policy 39, 318–333 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Adapting the Energy Sector to Climate Change (IAEA, 2019);

  16. Jordaan, S. M., Siddiqi, A., Kakenmaster, W. & Hill, A. C. The climate vulnerabilities of global nuclear power. Glob. Environ. Polit. 19, 3–13 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Linnerud, K., Mideksa, T. K. & Eskeland, G. S. The impact of climate change on nuclear power supply. Energy J. 32, 149–168 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. US Department of Energy Selects Technology Project to Receive $1.5M for Near-Zero Water Consumption at Power Plants (US Department of Energy, 2020);

  19. Hickford, A. J., Blainey, S. P., Ortega Hortelano, A. & Pant, R. Resilience engineering: theory and practice in interdependent infrastructure systems. Environ. Syst. Decis. 38, 278–291 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Gatto, A. & Drago, C. A taxonomy of energy resilience. Energy Policy 136, 111007 (2020).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. The many faces of resilience. Nat. Energy 3, 83 (2018).

  22. Baik, S., Davis, A. L., Park, J. W., Sirinterlikci, S. & Morgan, M. G. Estimating what US residential customers are willing to pay for resilience to large electricity outages of long duration. Nat. Energy 5, 250–258 (2020).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Attia, S. I. The influence of condenser cooling water temperature on the thermal efficiency of a nuclear power plant. Ann. Nucl. Energy 80, 371–378 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Wu, T., Hu, A., Gao, F., Zhang, J. & Meehl, G. A. New insights into natural variability and anthropogenic forcing of global/regional climate evolution. npj Clim. Atmos. Sci. 2, 18 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Non-baseload Operation in Nuclear Power Plants: Load Following and Frequency Control Modes of Flexible Operation (IAEA, 2018);

  26. Electric Grid Reliability and Interface with Nuclear Power Plants (IAEA, 2012);

  27. Lynam, C. P. et al. Have jellyfish in the Irish Sea benefited from climate change and overfishing? Glob. Change Biol. 17, 767–782 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Attrill, M. J., Wright, J. & Edwards, M. Climate-related increases in jellyfish frequency suggest a more gelatinous future for the North Sea. Limnol. Oceanogr. 52, 480–485 (2007).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Chediak, M. & Sullivan, B. K. PG&E Warns of Power Cuts to 466,000 Customers To Prevent Fires (Bloomberg, 2020);

  30. Sathaye, J. A. et al. Estimating impacts of warming temperatures on California’s electricity system. Glob. Environ. Change 23, 499–511 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Loisel, R., Alexeeva, V., Zucker, A. & Shropshire, D. Load-following with nuclear power: market effects and welfare implications. Prog. Nucl. Energy 109, 280–292 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Schneider, M. et al. World Nuclear Industry Status Report 2020 (World Nuclear Industry, 2020);

  33. Coumou, D. & Rahmstorf, S. A decade of weather extremes. Nat. Clim. Change 2, 491–496 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Witze, A. Why extreme rains are gaining strength as the climate warms. Nature 563, 458–460 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Schiermeier, Q. Climate change made Europe’s mega-heatwave five times more likely. Nature 571, 155–155 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Peters, I. M. & Buonassisi, T. The impact of global warming on silicon PV energy yield in 2100. In 2019 IEEE 46th Photovoltaic Specialists Conference 3179–3181 (IEEE, 2019);

  37. Global temperature. NASA (2020).

  38. IPCC Climate Change 2014: Synthesis Report (eds Core Writing Team, Pachauri, R. K. & Meyer, L. A.) (IPCC, 2014);

  39. IPCC Special Report on Global Warming of 1.5 °C (eds Masson-Delmotte, V. et al.) (WMO, 2018);

  40. Climate Risk and Response: Physical Hazards and Socioeconomic Impacts (McKinsey Global Institute, 2020).

  41. Tippett, M. K. Extreme weather and climate. npj Clim. Atmos. Sci. 1, 45 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Efficient Water Management in Water Cooled Reactors (IAEA, 2012);

  43. Armstrong, R. C. et al. The frontiers of energy. Nat. Energy 1, 15020 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Ramana, M. V. & Mian, Z. One size doesn’t fit all: social priorities and technical conflicts for small modular reactors. Energy Res. Soc. Sci. 2, 115–124 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references


I thank M. Bunn of the Harvard Kennedy School for his insightful comments on the manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations


Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ali Ahmad.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The author declares no competing interests.

Additional information

Peer review information Nature Energy thanks Sarah Jordaan, Peter Larsen and the other, anonymous, reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work.

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Source data

Source Data Fig. 2

Numerical data.

Source Data Fig. 3

Numerical data.

Source Data Fig. 4

Numerical data.

Source Data Fig. 5

Numerical data.

Source Data Fig. 6

Numerical data.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ahmad, A. Increase in frequency of nuclear power outages due to changing climate. Nat Energy 6, 755–762 (2021).

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI:

Further reading


Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing