Ninety-five per cent of Indian households now have access to liquified petroleum gas (LPG), with 80 million acquiring it under the Pradhan Mantri Ujjwala Yojana (PMUY) since 2016. Still, having a connection is not enough to eliminate household air pollution. Studying panel data from rural households in six major states from 2014–2015 and 2018, we assess the determinants of cooking energy transition from solid fuels to LPG. We find that PMUY beneficiaries have much lower odds of using LPG as the primary or exclusive fuel compared with general customers, irrespective of their economic status. Village-level penetration of LPG as a primary fuel and the years of LPG use positively influence its sustained use, while ease of access to freely available biomass and reliance on uncertain and irregular income sources hinder LPG use. The findings highlight the need to interlace cooking fuel policies with rural development, to enable a complete transition towards cleaner cooking fuels.
Subscribe to Journal
Get full journal access for 1 year
only $4.92 per issue
All prices are NET prices.
VAT will be added later in the checkout.
Rent or Buy article
Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.
All prices are NET prices.
The data that support the findings of this study (both of panel and cross-sectional analysis) are made available through Figshare at https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.9810170.
The Stata.do files that format, clean and analyse the merged and appended datasets are available through Figshare at https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.9810167, while the R scripts that produce the figures are available at https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.11838963. Information on unique identifiers between the datasets is available in the Stata.do file.
Report of the Comptroller and Auditor General of India on Pradhan Mantri Ujjwala Yojana (Comptroller and Auditor General of India, 2019); https://cag.gov.in/content/report-no14-2019-performance-audit-pradhan-mantri-ujjwala-yojana-ministry-petroleum-and
Census of India 2011 (Office of the Registrar General & Census Commissioner, India & Ministry of Home Affairs, Government of India, 2013); http://censusindia.gov.in/Tables_Published/H-Series/houselist_main.html
Balakrishnan, K. et al. The impact of air pollution on deaths, disease burden, and life expectancy across the states of India: the Global Burden of Disease Study 2017. Lancet Planet. Health 3, e26–e39 (2019).
Jeuland, M., Pattanayak, S. K. & Bluffstone, R. The economics of household air pollution. Annu. Rev. Resour. Econ. 7, 81–108 (2015).
Bailis, R., Wang, Y., Drigo, R., Ghilardi, A. & Masera, O. Getting the numbers right: revisiting woodfuel sustainability in the developing world. Environ. Res. Lett. 12, 115002 (2017).
Bhaskar, U. NDA Ujjwala surpasses targets, provides 80.33 million LPG connections. Mint (9 September 2019).
Gould, C. F. & Urpelainen, J. LPG as a clean cooking fuel: adoption, use, and impact in rural India. Energy Policy 122, 395–408 (2018).
Kumar, P., Kaushalendra Rao, R. & Reddy, N. H. Sustained uptake of LPG as cleaner cooking fuel in rural India: role of affordability, accessibility, and awareness. World Dev. Perspect. 4, 33–37 (2016).
Dabage, A., Sreenivas, A. & Josey, A. What has Pradhan Mantra Ujjwala Yojana achieved so far? Econ. Polit. Wkly 53, 69–75 (2018).
Kar, A., Singh, D., Pachauri, S., Bailis, R. & Zerriffi, H. in The Ujjwala Saga – Unending Happiness & Health 16–21 (Ministry of Petroleum and Natural Gas, Government of India, 2019).
Ministry of Petroleum and Natural Gas. 7.23 Crore Connections released under Pradhan Mantri Ujjwala Yojana. Press Information Bureau Government of India https://pib.gov.in/newsite/PrintRelease.aspx?relid=190670 (2019).
Ahmad, N., Sharma, S. & Singh, D. A. K. Pradhan Mantri Ujjwala Yojana (PMUY) step towards social inclusion in India. Int. J. Trend Res. Dev. 5, 46–49 (2018).
Giri, A. & Aadil, A. Pradhan Mantri Ujjwala Yojana: A Demand-side Diagnostic Study of LPG Refills Policy Brief (MicroSave, 2018).
Smith, K. R. in Making of New India: Transformation Under Modi Government (eds Debroy, B. et al.) 401–410 (Dr. Syama Prasad Mookerjee Research Foundation and Wisdom Tree, 2018).
Kar, A., Pachauri, S., Bailis, R. & Zerriffi, H. Using sales data to assess cooking gas adoption and the impact of India’s Ujjwala programme in rural Karnataka. Nat. Energy 4, 806–814 (2019).
Pope, D., Bruce, N., Dherani, M., Jagoe, K. & Rehfuess, E. Real-life effectiveness of ‘improved’ stoves and clean fuels in reducing PM 2.5 and CO: systematic review and meta-analysis. Environ. Int. 101, 7–18 (2017).
Sambandam, S. et al. Can currently available advanced combustion biomass cook-stoves provide health relevant exposure reductions? Results from initial assessment of select commercial models in India. EcoHealth 12, 25–41 (2015).
Johnson, M. A. & Chiang, R. A. Quantitative guidance for stove usage and performance to achieve health and environmental targets. Environ. Health Perspect. 123, 820–826 (2015).
Ruiz-Mercado, I. & Masera, O. Patterns of stove use in the context of fuel-device stacking: rationale and implications. EcoHealth 12, 42–56 (2015).
Muller, C. & Yan, H. Household fuel use in developing countries: Review of theory and evidence. Energy Econ. 70, 429–439 (2018).
Lewis, J. J. & Pattanayak, S. K. Who adopts improved fuels and cookstoves? A systematic review. Environ. Health Perspect. 120, 637–645 (2012).
Puzzolo, E., Pope, D., Stanistreet, D., Rehfuess, E. A. & Bruce, N. G. Clean fuels for resource-poor settings: A systematic review of barriers and enablers to adoption and sustained use. Environ. Res. 146, 218–234 (2016).
Gupta, G. & Köhlin, G. Preferences for domestic fuel: Analysis with socio-economic factors and rankings in Kolkata, India. Ecol. Econ. 57, 107–121 (2006).
Joon, V., Chandra, A. & Bhattacharya, M. Household energy consumption pattern and socio-cultural dimensions associated with it: A case study of rural Haryana, India. Biomass Bioenergy 33, 1509–1512 (2009).
Farsi, M., Filippini, M. & Pachauri, S. Fuel choices in urban Indian households. Environ. Dev. Econ. 12, 757–774 (2007).
Kemmler, A. Factors influencing household access to electricity in India. Energy Sustain. Dev. 11, 13–20 (2007).
Pandey, V. L. & Chaubal, A. Comprehending household cooking energy choice in rural India. Biomass Bioenergy 35, 4724–4731 (2011).
Ahmad, S. & Puppim de Oliveira, J. A. Fuel switching in slum and non-slum households in urban India. J. Clean. Prod. 94, 130–136 (2015).
Khandker, S. R., Barnes, D. F. & Samad, H. A. Energy Poverty in Rural and Urban India : Are the Energy Poor also Income Poor? (The World Bank, 2010); http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/920901468259774557/Energy-poverty-in-rural-and-urban-India-are-the-energy-poor-also-income-poor (2010).
Kishore, A. & Spears, D. Having a Son Promotes Clean Cooking Fuel Use in Urban India: Women’s Status and Son Preference. Econ. Dev. Cult. Change 62, 673–699 (2014).
Epstein, M. B. et al. Household fuels, low birth weight, and neonatal death in India: The separate impacts of biomass, kerosene, and coal. Int. J. Hyg. Environ. Health 216, 523–532 (2013).
Mishra, V. K. & Retherford, R. D. Cooking smoke increases the risk of acute respiratory infection in children. Natl. Fam. Health Surv. Bull. 8, 1–4 (1997).
Mishra, V. K., Retherford, R. D. & Smith, K. R. Biomass cooking fuels and prevalence of tuberculosis in India. Int. J. Infect. Dis. 3, 119–129 (1999).
Cheng, C. & Urpelainen, J. Fuel stacking in India: Changes in the cooking and lighting mix, 1987–2010. Energy 76, 306–317 (2014).
Gangopadhyay, S., Ramaswami, B. & Wadhwa, W. Reducing subsidies on household fuels in India: how will it affect the poor? Energy Policy 33, 2326–2336 (2005).
Viswanathan, B. & Kavi Kumar, K. S. Cooking fuel use patterns in India: 1983–2000. Energy Policy 33, 1021–1036 (2005).
Swarup, V. A. & Rao, K. R. An Econometric Approach to Analysis of Trends and Patterns of Household Fuel Choices in India. Indian Econ. Rev. 50, 105–129 (2015).
Singh, D., Pachauri, S. & Zerriffi, H. Environmental payoffs of LPG cooking in India. Environ. Res. Lett. 12, 115003 (2017).
Harmonized household energy survey questions. World Health Organization http://www.who.int/airpollution/household/survey-harmonization/en/ (2018).
Rao, M. N. & Reddy, B. S. Variations in energy use by Indian households: An analysis of micro level data. Energy 32, 143–153 (2007).
Alem, Y., Beyene, A. D., Köhlin, G. & Mekonnen, A. Modeling household cooking fuel choice: A panel multinomial logit approach. Energy Econ. 59, 129–137 (2016).
Choumert-Nkolo, J., Combes Motel, P. & Le Roux, L. Stacking up the ladder: A panel data analysis of Tanzanian household energy choices. World Dev. 115, 222–235 (2019).
Lam, N. L., Smith, K. R., Gauthier, A. & Bates, M. N. Kerosene: a review of household uses and their hazards in low- and middle-income countries. J. Toxicol. Environ. Health B 15, 396–432 (2012).
Simons, A. M., Beltramo, T., Blalock, G. & Levine, D. I. Using unobtrusive sensors to measure and minimize Hawthorne effects: evidence from cookstoves. J. Environ. Econ. Manag. 86, 68–80 (2017).
Dickinson, K. L. et al. Adoption of improved biomass stoves and stove/fuel stacking in the REACCTING intervention study in Northern Ghana. Energy Policy 130, 361–374 (2019).
Gould, C. F. et al. Household fuel mixes in peri-urban and rural Ecuador: Explaining the context of LPG, patterns of continued firewood use, and the challenges of induction cooking. Energy Policy 136, 111053 (2020).
Aklin, M., Cheng, C., Ganesan, K., Jain, A. & Urpelainen, J. Access to Clean Cooking Energy and Electricity: Survey of States in India (ACCESS) (Harvard Dataverse, 2016); https://doi.org/10.7910/DVN/0NV9LF.
Aklin, M., Cheng, C., Urpelainen, J., Ganesan, K. & Jain, A. Factors affecting household satisfaction with electricity supply in rural India. Nat. Energy 1, 16170 (2016).
Jain, A. et al. Access to Clean Cooking Energy and Electricity: Survey of States (CEEW, 2015); https://www.ceew.in/publications/access-clean-cooking-energy-and-electricity (2018)
Mani, S. et al. Access to Clean Cooking Energy and Electricity: Survey of States in India 2018 (ACCESS 2018) (Harvard Dataverse, 2019); https://doi.org/10.7910/DVN/AHFINM
Dalaba, M. et al. Liquified petroleum gas (LPG) supply and demand for cooking in Northern Ghana. EcoHealth 15, 716–728 (2018).
Carrión, D. et al. Enhancing LPG adoption in Ghana (ELAG): a factorial cluster-randomized controlled trial to Enhance LPG Adoption & Sustained use. BMC Public Health 18, 689 (2018).
Dickinson, K. L. et al. Prices, peers, and perceptions (P3): study protocol for improved biomass cookstove project in northern Ghana. BMC Public Health 18, 1209 (2018).
Sehjpal, R., Ramji, A., Soni, A. & Kumar, A. Going beyond incomes: Dimensions of cooking energy transitions in rural India. Energy 68, 470–477 (2014).
Gould, C. F. & Urpelainen, J. The gendered nature of liquefied petroleum gas stove adoption and use in rural India. J. Dev. Stud. 0, 1–21 (2019).
Pachauri, S. & Rao, N. D. Gender impacts and determinants of energy poverty: are we asking the right questions? Curr. Opin. Environ. Sustain. 5, 205–215 (2013).
Rahut, D. B., Behera, B. & Ali, A. Patterns and determinants of household use of fuels for cooking: empirical evidence from sub-Saharan Africa. Energy 117, 93–104 (2016).
Abebaw, D. Household determinants of fuelwood choice in urban Ethiopia: a case study of Jimma Town. J. Dev. Areas 41, 117–126 (2007).
Ouedraogo, B. Household energy preferences for cooking in urban Ouagadougou, Burkina Faso. Energy Policy 34, 3787–3795 (2006).
Kar, A. & Zerriffi, H. From cookstove acquisition to cooking transition: framing the behavioural aspects of cookstove interventions. Energy Res. Soc. Sci. 42, 22–33 (2018).
Pattanayak, S. K. et al. Experimental evidence on promotion of electric and improved biomass cookstoves. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 116, 13282–13287 (2019).
Pillarisetti, A. et al. Promoting LPG usage during pregnancy: a pilot study in rural Maharashtra, India. Environ. Int. 127, 540–549 (2019).
Behera, B., Rahut, D. B., Jeetendra, A. & Ali, A. Household collection and use of biomass energy sources in South Asia. Energy 85, 468–480 (2015).
Baquié, S. & Urpelainen, J. Access to modern fuels and satisfaction with cooking arrangements: Survey evidence from rural India. Energy Sustain. Dev. 38, 34–47 (2017).
Filmer, D. & Pritchett, L. Estimating wealth effects without expenditure data—Or tears: An application to educational enrollments in states of India. Demography 38, 115–132 (2001).
Menghwani, V. et al. Determinants of cookstoves and fuel choice among rural households in India. EcoHealth 16, 21–60 (2019).
Vyas, S. & Kumaranayake, L. Constructing socio-economic status indices: how to use principal components analysis. Health Policy Plan. 21, 459–468 (2006).
Paudel, U., Khatri, U. & Pant, K. P. Understanding the determinants of household cooking fuel choice in Afghanistan: A multinomial logit estimation. Energy 156, 55–62 (2018).
Ravindra, K., Kaur-Sidhu, M., Mor, S. & John, S. Trend in household energy consumption pattern in India: A case study on the influence of socio-cultural factors for the choice of clean fuel use. J. Clean. Prod. 213, 1024–1034 (2019).
van der Kroon, B., Brouwer, R. & van Beukering, P. J. H. The energy ladder: Theoretical myth or empirical truth? Results from a meta-analysis. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 20, 504–513 (2013).
Peng, W., Zerriffi, H. & Pan, J. Household level fuel switching in rural Hubei. Energy Sustain. Dev. 14, 238–244 (2010).
Shi, X., Heerink, N. & Qu, F. The role of off-farm employment in the rural energy consumption transition — A village-level analysis in Jiangxi Province, China. China Econ. Rev. 20, 350–359 (2009).
Heltberg, R. Fuel switching: evidence from eight developing countries. Energy Econ. 26, 869–887 (2004).
The Council on Energy, Environment and Water supported time spent by S.M., A.J. and S.T. on this research. The data collection was supported by the Shakti Sustainable Energy Foundation and the National University of Singapore. C.F.G. is supported by the United States National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences grant no. T32 ES007322.
The authors declare no competing interests.
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
About this article
Cite this article
Mani, S., Jain, A., Tripathi, S. et al. The drivers of sustained use of liquified petroleum gas in India. Nat Energy 5, 450–457 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41560-020-0596-7
Nature Energy (2020)