Abstract
Successful alien species may experience a period of quiescence, known as the lag phase, before becoming invasive and widespread. The existence of lags introduces severe uncertainty in risk analyses of aliens as the present state of species is a poor predictor of future distributions, invasion success and impact. Predicting a species’ ability to invade and pose negative impacts requires a quantitative understanding of the commonality and magnitude of lags, environmental factors and mechanisms likely to terminate lag. Using herbarium and climate data, we analysed over 5,700 time series (species × regions) in 3,505 naturalized plant species from nine regions in temperate and tropical climates to quantify lags and test whether there have been shifts in the species’ climatic space during the transition from the lag phase to the expansion phase. Lags were identified in 35% of the assessed invasion events. We detected phylogenetic signals for lag phases in temperate climate regions and that annual self-fertilizing species were less likely to experience lags. Where lags existed, they had an average length of 40 years and a maximum of 320 years. Lengthy lags (>100 years) were more likely to occur in perennial plants and less frequent in self-pollinating species. For 98% of the species with a lag phase, the climate spaces sampled during the lag period differed from those in the expansion phase based on the assessment of centroid shifts or degree of climate space overlap. Our results highlight the importance of functional traits for the onset of the expansion phase and suggest that climate discovery may play a role in terminating the lag phase. However, other possibilities, such as sampling issues and climate niche shifts, cannot be ruled out.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Access options
Access Nature and 54 other Nature Portfolio journals
Get Nature+, our best-value online-access subscription
$29.99 / 30 days
cancel any time
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 12 digital issues and online access to articles
$119.00 per year
only $9.92 per issue
Buy this article
- Purchase on Springer Link
- Instant access to full article PDF
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
Similar content being viewed by others
Data availability
For Australia, a list of naturalized alien plants was acquired from the compendium of the introduced flora of Australia65 and the corresponding occurrence records were extracted from Australia’s Virtual Herbarium (https://www.ala.org.au)67. New Zealand’s data were obtained from literature41,47,68. The GloNAF database is available in the literature69,101 and was queried to extract species lists for the remaining six regions. Georeferenced occurrence records were extracted from the Global Biodiversity Informatics Facility (https://www.gbif.org)70. Trait data were extracted from TRYDB (https://www.try-db.org). Climate data were downloaded from the second version of the WorldClim dataset (https://www.worldclim.org/data/worldclim21.html). All data are available online and in the literature.
The minimum dataset comprises the naturalized species lists sourced from the GloNaf database, the compendium of the introduced flora of Australia65 and previous studies41,47 and is available under the CC BY 4.0 licence (https://doi.org/10.26188/24782898).
Code availability
The analysis has been implemented using existing packages referenced in the text. Implementation scripts are available on request.
References
Pyšek, P. & Richardson, D. M. Invasive species, environmental change and management, and health. Annu. Rev. Environ. Resour. 35, 25–55 (2010).
Simberloff, D. et al. Impacts of biological invasions: what’s what and the way forward. Trends Ecol. Evol. 28, 58–66 (2013).
Hulme, P. E. Trade, transport and trouble: managing invasive species pathways in an era of globalization. J. Appl. Ecol. 46, 10–18 (2009).
Pimentel, D., Zuniga, R. & Morrison, D. Update on the environmental and economic costs associated with alien-invasive species in the United States. Ecol. Econ. 52, 273–288 (2005).
Kowarik, I. in Plant Invasions: General Aspects and Special Problems, (eds Pysek, P. et al.) 15–38 (SPB Academic Publishing, Amsterdam, 1995).
Hawks, J. Lag times of biological invasions. John Hawks Weblog http://johnhawks.net/weblog/topics/evolution/invasive/lag-time-invasive-species-2010.html (2010).
Crooks, J. A. Lag times and exotic species: the ecology and management of biological invasions in slow-motion. Ecoscience 12, 316–329 (2005).
Pysek, P. & Prach, K. Plant invasions and the role of riparian habitats: a comparison of four species alien to Central Europe. J. Biogeogr. 20, 413–420 (1993).
Cunningham, D. C., Woldendorp, G., Burgess, M. B. & Barry, S. C. Prioritising Sleeper Weeds for Eradication: Selection of Species Based on Potential Impacts on Agriculture and Feasibility of Eradication (Bureau of Rural Sciences, 2003).
Simberloff, D. Non-natives: 141 scientists object. Nature 475, 36 (2011).
Seabloom, E. W. et al. Human impacts, plant invasion, and imperiled plant species in California. Ecol. Appl. 16, 1338–1350 (2006).
Essl, F. et al. Socioeconomic legacy yields an invasion debt. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 108, 203–207 (2011).
van Kleunen, M., Bossdorf, O. & Dawson, W. The ecology and evolution of alien plants. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst. 49, 25–47 (2018).
Duncan, R. P. Time lags and the invasion debt in plant naturalisations. Ecol. Lett. 24, 1363–1374 (2021).
Pyšek, P. & Richardson, D. M. The biogeography of naturalization in alien plants. J. Biogeogr. 33, 2040–2050 (2006).
Milbau, A. & Stout, J. C. Factors associated with alien plants transitioning from casual, to naturalized, to invasive. Conserv. Biol. 22, 308–317 (2008).
Marsico, T. D. et al. Underutilized resources for studying the evolution of invasive species during their introduction, establishment, and lag phases. Evol. Appl. 3, 203–219 (2010).
Lososová, Z. et al. Alien plants invade more phylogenetically clustered community types and cause even stronger clustering. Glob. Ecol. Biogeogr. 24, 786–794 (2015).
Colautti, R. I. & Lau, J. A. Contemporary evolution during invasion: evidence for differentiation, natural selection, and local adaptation. Mol. Ecol. 24, 1999–2017 (2015).
Wangen, S. R. & Webster, C. R. Potential for multiple lag phases during biotic invasions: reconstructing an invasion of the exotic tree Acer platanoides: lag phases and biotic invasions. J. Appl. Ecol. 43, 258–268 (2006).
Colautti, R. I. & Barrett, S. C. H. Rapid adaptation to climate facilitates range expansion of an invasive plant. Science 342, 364–366 (2013).
Chapman, D. S., Scalone, R., Štefanić, E. & Bullock, J. M. Mechanistic species distribution modeling reveals a niche shift during invasion. Ecology 98, 1671–1680 (2017).
Lockwood, J. L., Cassey, P. & Blackburn, T. The role of propagule pressure in explaining species invasions. Trends Ecol. Evol. 20, 223–228 (2005).
Meza Torres, E. I., Cerne, B., Ulke, A. G. & Morbelli, M. A. Distribution of Ophioglossum reticulatum L. in South America. A case of long-distance jump dispersal? Int. J. Biometeorol. 59, 137–150 (2014).
Rödder, D. Human footprint, facilitated jump dispersal, and the potential distribution of the invasive Eleutherodactylus johnstonei Barbour 1914 (Anura Eleutherodactylidae). Trop. Zool. 22, 205–217 (2009).
Geerts, S. et al. The absence of fire can cause a lag phase: The invasion dynamics of Banksia ericifolia (Proteaceae). Austral Ecol. 38, 931–941 (2013).
McClaran, M. P. & Anable, M. E. Spread of introduced Lehmann lovegrass along a grazing intensity gradient. J. Appl. Ecol. 29, 92–98 (1992).
Dawson, W., Burslem, D. F. R. P. & Hulme, P. E. Factors explaining alien plant invasion success in a tropical ecosystem differ at each stage of invasion. J. Ecol. 97, 657–665 (2009).
Pyšek, P. et al. Naturalized alien flora of the world: species diversity, taxonomic and phylogenetic patterns, geographic distribution and global hotspots of plant invasion. Preslia 89, 203–274 (2017).
Van Kleunen, M., Dawson, W., Schlaepfer, D., Jeschke, J. M. & Fischer, M. Are invaders different? A conceptual framework of comparative approaches for assessing determinants of invasiveness: comparisons on determinants of invasiveness. Ecol. Lett. 13, 947–958 (2010).
Soberón, J. Grinnellian and Eltonian niches and geographic distributions of species. Ecol. Lett. 10, 1115–1123 (2007).
Peterson, A. T. et al. Ecological Niches and Geographic Distributions (MPB-49) (Princeton Univ. Press, 2011).
Soberón, J. M. Niche and area of distribution modeling: a population ecology perspective. Ecography 33, 159–167 (2010).
Moore, D. A., Overton, M. W., Chebel, R. C., Truscott, M. L. & BonDurant, R. H. Evaluation of factors that affect embryonic loss in dairy cattle. J. Am. Vet. Med. Assoc. 226, 1112–1118 (2005).
Guisan, A., Petitpierre, B., Broennimann, O., Daehler, C. & Kueffer, C. Unifying niche shift studies: insights from biological invasions. Trends Ecol. Evol. 29, 260–269 (2014).
Stralberg, D. et al. Re-shuffling of species with climate disruption: a no-analog future for California birds? PLoS ONE 4, e6825 (2009).
Broennimann, O. et al. Evidence of climatic niche shift during biological invasion. Ecol. Lett. 10, 701–709 (2007).
Petitpierre, B. et al. Climatic niche shifts are rare among terrestrial plant invaders. Science 335, 1344–1348 (2012).
Richardson, D. M. & Pyšek, P. Naturalization of introduced plants: ecological drivers of biogeographical patterns. N. Phytol. 196, 383–396 (2012).
Keitt, T. H., Lewis, M. A. & Holt, R. D. Allee effects, invasion pinning, and species’ borders. Am. Nat. 157, 203–216 (2001).
Hyndman, R. J., Mesgaran, M. B. & Cousens, R. D. Statistical issues with using herbarium data for the estimation of invasion lag-phases. Biol. Invasions 17, 3371–3381 (2015).
Mesgaran, M. B., Cousens, R. D. & Webber, B. L. Here be dragons: a tool for quantifying novelty due to covariate range and correlation change when projecting species distribution models. Divers. Distrib. 20, 1147–1159 (2014).
Gallagher, R. V., Randall, R. P. & Leishman, M. R. Trait differences between naturalized and invasive plant species independent of residence time and phylogeny. Conserv. Biol. https://doi.org/10.1111/cobi.12399 (2014).
Larkin, D. J. Lengths and correlates of lag phases in upper-Midwest plant invasions. Biol. Invasions 14, 827–838 (2012).
Moodley, D., Geerts, S., Richardson, D. M. & Wilson, J. R. U. Different traits determine introduction, naturalization and invasion success in woody plants: Proteaceae as a test case. PLoS ONE 8, e75078 (2013).
Godoy, O., Valladares, F. & Castro-Díez, P. The relative importance for plant invasiveness of trait means, and their plasticity and integration in a multivariate framework. N. Phytol. 195, 912–922 (2012).
Aikio, S., Duncan, R. P. & Hulme, P. E. Lag-phases in alien plant invasions: separating the facts from the artefacts. Oikos 119, 370–378 (2010).
Daehler, C. C. Short lag times for invasive tropical plants: evidence from experimental plantings in Hawai’i. PLoS ONE 4, e4462 (2009).
Hewitt, J. E., Norkko, J., Kauppi, L., Villnäs, A. & Norkko, A. Species and functional trait turnover in response to broad‐scale change and an invasive species. Ecosphere 7, e01289 (2016).
Funk, J. L., Standish, R. J., Stock, W. D. & Valladares, F. Plant functional traits of dominant native and invasive species in Mediterranean-climate ecosystems. Ecology 97, 75–83 (2016).
Küster, E. C., Kühn, I., Bruelheide, H. & Klotz, S. Trait interactions help explain plant invasion success in the German flora. J. Ecol. 96, 860–868 (2008).
Moles, A. T., Gruber, M. A. M. & Bonser, S. P. A new framework for predicting invasive plant species. J. Ecol. 96, 13–17 (2007).
Blomberg, S. P., Garland, T. & Ives, A. R. Testing for phylogenetic signal in comparative data: behavioral traits are more labile. Evolution 57, 717–745 (2003).
Kembel, S. W. et al. Picante: R tools for integrating phylogenies and ecology. Bioinformatics 26, 1463–1464 (2010).
Kriticos, D. J. et al. CliMond: global high-resolution historical and future scenario climate surfaces for bioclimatic modelling. Methods Ecol. Evol. 3, 53–64 (2012).
Pyšek, P., Jarošík, V., Pergl, J. & Wild, J. Colonization of high altitudes by alien plants over the last two centuries. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 108, 439–440 (2011).
Walther, G.-R. et al. Alien species in a warmer world: risks and opportunities. Trends Ecol. Evol. 24, 686–693 (2009).
Kriticos, D. J., Sutherst, R. W., Brown, J. R., Adkins, S. W. & Maywald, G. F. Climate change and the potential distribution of an invasive alien plant: Acacia nilotica ssp. indica in Australia. J. Appl. Ecol. 40, 111–124 (2003).
Zachariah Atwater, D. & Barney, J. N. Climatic niche shifts in 815 introduced plant species affect their predicted distributions. Glob. Ecol. Biogeogr. 30, 1671–1684 (2021).
Beaumont, L. Evidence for climate niche and biome shifts between native and novel ranges in plant species introduced to Australia. J. Ecol. 98, 790–799 (2010).
Merow, C., Bois, S. T., Allen, J. M., Xie, Y. & Silander, J. A. Jr. Climate change both facilitates and inhibits invasive plant ranges in New England. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 114, E3276–E3284 (2017).
Ehler, L. E. Invasion biology and biological control. Biol. Control 13, 127–133 (1998).
Richardson, D. M., Allsopp, N., D’Antonio, C. M., Milton, S. J. & Rejmánek, M. Plant invasions—the role of mutualisms. Biol. Rev. Camb. Philos. Soc. 75, 65–93 (2000).
Arim, M., Abades, S. R., Neill, P. E., Lima, M. & Marquet, P. A. Spread dynamics of invasive species. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 103, 374–378 (2006).
Randall, R. P. The Introduced Flora of Australia and Its Weed Status (2007) (CRC for Australian Weed Management Department of Agriculture and Food, Western Australia, accessed May 2016); https://www.une.edu.au/__data/assets/pdf_file/0019/52372/2007.-The-introduced-flora-of-Australia-and-its-weed-status.pdf
Dodd, A. J., Burgman, M. A., McCarthy, M. A. & Ainsworth, N. The changing patterns of plant naturalization in Australia. Divers. Distrib. 21, 1038–1050 (2015).
Council of Heads of Australasian Herbaria (The Australasian Virtual Herbarium, accessed 2016); https://avh.chah.org.au/
New Zealand National Herbarium Network (The New Zealand Virtual Herbarium, accessed 2016); www.virtualherbarium.org.nz
van Kleunen, M. et al. Global exchange and accumulation of non-native plants. Nature 525, 100–103 (2015).
GBIF Secretariat (The Global Biodiversity Information Facility, accessed 2019); https://www.gbif.org
Delisle, F., Lavoie, C., Jean, M. & Lachance, D. Reconstructing the spread of invasive plants: taking into account biases associated with herbarium specimens: invasive plants and herbarium specimens. J. Biogeogr. 30, 1033–1042 (2003).
Pyšek, P., Sádlo, J., Mandák, B. & Jarosík, V. Czech alien flora and the historical pattern of its formation: what came first to Central Europe? Oecologia 135, 122–130 (2003).
Williamson, M., Pyšek, P., Jarošík, V. & Prach, K. On the rates and patterns of spread of alien plants in the Czech Republic, Britain, and Ireland. Ecoscience 12, 424–433 (2005).
Kattge, J. et al. TRY plant trait database—enhanced coverage and open access. Glob. Chang. Biol. 26, 119–188 (2020).
Parr, C. S. et al. The Encyclopedia of Life v2: providing global access to knowledge about life on Earth. Biodivers. Data J. 2, e1079 (2014).
Klotz, S., Kühn, I. & Durka, W. BIOFLOR. Eine Datenbank mit Biologischökologischen merkmalen zur Flora von Deutschland. (Bundesamt für Naturschutz, Bonn, 2002).
Fitter, A. H. & Peat, H. J. The ecological flora database. J. Ecol. 82, 415–425 (1994).
National Plant Data Team PLANTS Database 2006 (USDA, accessed June 2016); http://plants.usda.gov
Hojsgaard, D., Klatt, S., Baier, R., Carman, J. G. & Hörandl, E. Taxonomy and biogeography of apomixis in angiosperms and associated biodiversity characteristics. CRC Crit. Rev. Plant Sci. 33, 414–427 (2014).
Barney, J. N. North American history of two invasive plant species: phytogeographic distribution, dispersal vectors, and multiple introductions. Biol. Invasions 8, 703–717 (2006).
Mesgaran, M. B. et al. Importance of distribution function selection for hydrothermal time models of seed germination. Weed Res. 53, 89–101 (2013).
Haque, M. M., Nipperess, D., Baumgartner, J. & Beaumont, L. J. A journey through time: exploring temporal patterns amongst digitized plant specimens from Australia. Syst. Biodivers. 16, 604–613 (2018).
Cousens, R. & Mortimer, M. Dynamics of weed populations 346 (Cambridge Univ. Press, 1995); https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511608629
Dodd, A. J., McCarthy, M. A., Ainsworth, N. & Burgman, M. A. Identifying hotspots of alien plant naturalisation in Australia: approaches and predictions. Biol. Invasions 18, 631–645 (2016).
Mahalanobis, P. C. On the generalised distance in statistics. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. India 2, 49–55 (1936).
R Core Team R: a language and environment for statistical computing (R Foundation for Statistical Computing, 2019).
MATLAB v.7.10.0 (R2020a) (MathWorks, 2020).
Hijmans, R. J., Cameron, S. E., Parra, J. L., Jones, P. G. & Jarvis, A. Very high resolution interpolated climate surfaces for global land areas. Int. J. Climatol. 25, 1965–1978 (2005).
Webber, B. L. et al. Modelling horses for novel climate courses: insights from projecting potential distributions of native and alien Australian acacias with correlative and mechanistic models: modelling Australian acacias. Divers. Distrib. 17, 978–1000 (2011).
Nuñez, M. A. & Medley, K. A. Pine invasions: climate predicts invasion success; something else predicts failure. Divers. Distrib. 17, 703–713 (2011).
Hijmans, R. J. & Graham, C. H. The ability of climate envelope models to predict the effect of climate change on species distributions. Glob. Chang. Biol. 12, 2272–2281 (2006).
Parravicini, V., Azzurro, E., Kulbicki, M. & Belmaker, J. Niche shift can impair the ability to predict invasion risk in the marine realm: an illustration using Mediterranean fish invaders. Ecol. Lett. 18, 246–253 (2015).
Gallagher, R. V., Beaumont, L. J., Hughes, L. & Leishman, M. R. Evidence for climatic niche and biome shifts between native and novel ranges in plant species introduced to Australia. J. Ecol. 98, 790–799 (2010).
Felsenstein, J. Confidence limits on phylogenies: an approach using the bootstrap. Evolution 39, 783–791 (1985).
Webb, C. O., Ackerly, D. D., McPeek, M. A. & Donoghue, M. J. Phylogenies and community ecology. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 33, 475–505 (2002).
Chamberlain S. brranching: Fetch 'Phylogenies' from Many Sources. (R package, 2023).
Garland, T. Jr & Ives, A. R. Using the past to predict the present: confidence intervals for regression equations in phylogenetic comparative methods. Am. Nat. 155, 346–364 (2000).
Paradis, E., Claude, J. & Strimmer, K. APE: analyses of phylogenetics and evolution in R language. Bioinformatics 20, 289–290 (2004).
Cadotte, M. W., Hamilton, M. A. & Murray, B. R. Phylogenetic relatedness and plant invader success across two spatial scales. Divers. Distrib. 15, 481–488 (2009).
Paradis, E. & Claude, J. Analysis of comparative data using generalized estimating equations. J. Theor. Biol. 218, 175–185 (2002).
van Kleunen, M. et al. The global naturalized alien flora (GloNAF) database. Ecology https://doi.org/10.1002/ecy.2542 (2018).
Acknowledgements
M.V.K. was supported by the German Research Foundation DFG (grant number 264740629). P.P. and J.P. were supported by EXPRO grant number 19-28807X (Czech Science Foundation) and long-term research development project RVO 67985939 (Czech Academy of Sciences). F.E. received funding through the 2017–2018 Belmont Forum and BiodivERsA joint call for research proposals under the BiodivScen ERA-Net COFUND programme and the funding organization FWF (‘AlienScenarios’ project number I 4011-B32).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
M.B.M. conceived the idea; M.B.M. and P.R. designed the research, performed the analysis and wrote the first draft of the paper; F.E., M.V.K., P.P., J.P. and P.W. provided data, edited the paper and provided comments.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Peer review
Peer review information
Nature Ecology & Evolution thanks Shaun Coutts, Ming Ni and the other, anonymous, reviewer for their contribution to the peer review of this work.
Additional information
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary information
Supplementary Information
Supplementary Figs. 1–6, full method and References.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Robeck, P., Essl, F., van Kleunen, M. et al. Invading plants remain undetected in a lag phase while they explore suitable climates. Nat Ecol Evol 8, 477–488 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41559-023-02313-4
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41559-023-02313-4