Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Article
  • Published:

Spatial sorting promotes rapid (mal)adaptation in the red-shouldered soapberry bug after hurricane-driven local extinctions

Nature Ecology & Evolution volume 7, pages 1856–1868 (2023)Cite this article

Subjects

Abstract

Predicting future evolutionary change is a critical challenge in the Anthropocene as geographic range shifts and local extinction emerge as hallmarks of planetary change. Hence, spatial sorting—a driver of rapid evolution in which dispersal-associated traits accumulate along expanding range edges and within recolonized habitats—might be of growing importance in ecology and conservation. We report on the results of a natural experiment that monitored recolonization of host plants by the seed-feeding, red-shouldered soapberry bug, Jadera haematoloma, after local extinctions from catastrophic flooding in an extreme hurricane. We tested the contribution of spatial sorting to generate rapid and persistent evolution in dispersal traits, as well as in feeding traits unrelated to dispersal. Long-winged dispersal forms accumulated in recolonized habitats and due to genetic correlation, mouthparts also became longer and this shift persisted across generations. Those longer mouthparts were probably adaptive on one host plant species but maladaptive on two others based on matching the optimum depth of seeds within their host fruits. Moreover, spatial sorting eroded recently evolved adaptive divergence in mouthpart length among all host-associated biotypes, an outcome pointing to profound practical consequences of the extreme weather event for local adaptation, population resilience and evolutionary futures.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

  • Purchase on Springer Link
  • Instant access to full article PDF
Buy now

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Fig. 1: Hurricane-associated flooding.
Fig. 2: Soapberry bug morphology and host plants.
Fig. 3: The effect of hurricane-associated flooding on soapberry bug population size and egg survival.
Fig. 4: Spatial sorting shifts the frequency of macropterous soapberry bugs.
Fig. 5: Spatial sorting promotes shifts in soapberry bug beak lengths.
Fig. 6: Spatial sorting erodes the history of host-associated natural selection.

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

All data collected for this project are freely available in the digital repository Dryad: https://doi.org/10.5061/dryad.tht76hf4t.

References

  1. Jørgensen, P. S., Folke, C. & Carroll, S. P. Evolution in the Anthropocene: informing governance and policy. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst. 50, 527–546 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Parmesan, C. & Yohe, G. A globally coherent fingerprint of climate change impacts across natural systems. Nature 421, 37–42 (2003).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Urban, M. C. et al. Improving the forecast for biodiversity under climate change. Science 353, aad8466 (2016).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Balaguru, K., Judi, D. R. & Leung, L. R. Future hurricane storm surge risk for the US gulf and Florida coasts based on projections of thermodynamic potential intensity. Clim. Change 138, 99–110 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Sobel, A. H. et al. Human influence on tropical cyclone intensity. Science 353, 242–246 (2016).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Weiskopf, S. R. et al. Climate change effects on biodiversity, ecosystems, ecosystem services and natural resource management in the United States. Sci. Total Environ. 733, 137782 (2020).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Banholzer, S., Kossin, J. & Donner, S. in Reducing Disaster: Early Warning Systems for Climate Change (eds Singh, A. & Zommers, Z.) 21–49 (Springer, 2014).

  8. Cwynar, L. C. & MacDonald, G. M. Geographical variation of lodgepole pine in relation to population history. Am. Nat. 129, 463–469 (1987).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Dytham, C. Evolved dispersal strategies at range margins. Proc. R. Soc. B 276, 1407–1413 (2009).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Shine, R., Brown, G. P. & Phillips, B. L. An evolutionary process that assembles phenotypes through space rather than through time. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 108, 5708–5711 (2011).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Phillips, B. L., Brown, G. P. & Shine, R. Life‐history evolution in range‐shifting populations. Ecology 91, 1617–1627 (2010).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Travis, J. M. & Dytham, C. Dispersal evolution during invasions. Evol. Ecol. Res. 4, 1119–1129 (2002).

    Google Scholar 

  13. Perkins, A. T., Phillips, B. L., Baskett, M. L. & Hastings, A. Evolution of dispersal and life history interact to drive accelerating spread of an invasive species. Ecol. Lett. 16, 1079–1087 (2013).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Weiss-Lehman, C., Hufbauer, R. A. & Melbourne, B. A. Rapid trait evolution drives increased speed and variance in experimental range expansions. Nat. Commun. 8, 14303 (2017).

  15. Ochocki, B. M. & Miller, T. E. Rapid evolution of dispersal ability makes biological invasions faster and more variable. Nat. Commun. 8, 14315 (2017).

  16. Darwin, C. Origin of Species by Means of Natural Selection; or, the Preservation of Favoured Races in the Struggle for Life (John Murray, 1859).

  17. Coyne, J. A. & Orr, H. A. Speciation (Sinauer Associates, 2004).

  18. Futuyma, D. J. in The Princeton Guide to Evolution (ed Losos, J.B.) Ch. 3 (Princeton University Press, 2009).

  19. Phillips, B. L. & Perkins, T. A. Spatial sorting as the spatial analogue of natural selection. Theor. Ecol. 12, 155–163 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Lowe, W. H., Muhlfeld, C. C. & Allendorf, F. W. Spatial sorting promotes the spread of maladaptive hybridization. Trends Ecol. Evol. 30, 456–462 (2015).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Edmonds, C. A., Lillie, A. S. & Cavalli-Sforza, L. L. Mutations arising in the wave front of an expanding population. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 101, 975–979 (2004).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Hallatschek, O., Hersen, P., Ramanathan, S. & Nelson, D. R. Genetic drift at expanding frontiers promotes gene segregation. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 104, 19926–19930 (2007).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Clarke, G. S., Shine, R. & Phillips, B. L. May the (selective) force be with you: spatial sorting and natural selection exert opposing forces on limb length in an invasive amphibian. J. Evol. Biol. 32, 994–1001 (2019).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Hudson, C. M., Phillips, B. L., Brown, G. P. & Shine, R. Virgins in the vanguard: low reproductive frequency in invasion-front cane toads. Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 116, 743–747 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Comerford, M. & Egan, S. P. The potential role of spatial sorting in speciation and adaptive radiations. Popul. Ecol. 64, 119–126 (2022).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Phillips, B. L., Brown, G. P., Travis, J. M. & Shine, R. Reid’s paradox revisited: the evolution of dispersal kernels during range expansion. Am. Nat. 172, S34–S48 (2008).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Louppe, V., Courant, J. & Herrel, A. Differences in mobility at the range edge of an expanding invasive population of Xenopus laevis in the west of France. J. Exp. Biol. 220, 278–283 (2017).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Pelletier, T. A. & Carstens, B. C. Comparing range evolution in two western Plethodon salamanders: glacial refugia, competition, ecological niches and spatial sorting. J. Biogeogr. 43, 2237–2249 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Berthouly-Salazar, C., van Rensburg, B. J., Le Roux, J. J., Van Vuuren, B. J. & Hui, C. Spatial sorting drives morphological variation in the invasive bird, Acridotheris tristis. PLoS ONE 7, e38145 (2012).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. Burstal, J., Clulow, S., Colyvas, K., Kark, S. & Griffin, A. S. Radiotracking invasive spread: are common mynas more active and exploratory on the invasion front? Biol. Invasions 22, 2525–2543 (2020).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Lomolino, M. V. Immigrant selection, predation and the distributions of Microtus pennsylvanicus and Blarina brevicauda on islands. Am. Nat. 123, 468–483 (1984).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Forsman, A., Merilä, J. & Ebenhard, T. Phenotypic evolution of dispersal-enhancing traits in insular voles. Proc. R. Soc. B 278, 225–232 (2011).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Moreau, C. et al. Deep human genealogies reveal a selective advantage to be on an expanding wave front. Science 334, 1148–1150 (2011).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Futuyma, D. & Kirkpatrick, M. Evolution (Sinauer, 2017).

  35. Carroll, S. P. & Boyd, C. Host race radiation in the soapberry bug: natural history with the history. Evolution 46, 1052–1069 (1992).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Carroll, S. P., Dingle, H. & Klassen, S. P. Genetic differentiation of fitness‐associated traits among rapidly evolving populations of the soapberry bug. Evolution 51, 1182–1188 (1997).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Carroll, S. P. et al. And the beak shall inherit—evolution in response to invasion. Ecol. Lett. 8, 944–951 (2005).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Carroll, S. P. Contrasts in reproductive ecology between temperate and tropical populations of Jadera haematoloma, a mate-guarding hemipteran (Rhopalidae). Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am. 81, 54–63 (1988).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Cenzer, M. L. Maladaptive plasticity masks the effects of natural selection in the red-shouldered soapberry bug. Am. Nat.190, 521–533 (2017).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Carroll, S. P. Natives adapting to invasive species: ecology, genes and the sustainability of conservation. Ecol. Res. 22, 892–901 (2007).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Dingle, H., Carroll, S. & Famula, T. Influence of genetic architecture on contemporary local evolution in the soapberry bug, Jadera haematoloma: artificial selection on beak length. J. Evol. Biol. 22, 2031–2040 (2009).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Carroll, S. P. The adaptive significance of mate guarding in the soapberry bug, Jadera haematoloma (Hemiptera: Rhopalidae). J. Insect Behav. 4, 509–530 (1991).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Tsai, J.-F., Hsieh, Y.-X. & Rédei, D. The soapberry bug, Jadera haematoloma (Insecta, Hemiptera, Rhopalidae): first Asian record, with a review of bionomics. ZooKeys 297, 1–41 (2013).

  44. Dingle, H. & Winchell, R. Juvenile hormone as a mediator of plasticity in insect life histories. Arch. Insect Biochem. Physiol. 35, 359–373 (1997).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  45. Carroll, S. P. & Salamon, M. H. Variation in sexual selection on male body size within and between populations of the soapberry bug. Anim. Behav. 50, 1463–1474 (1995).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Dingle, H. in Insect Movement: Mechanisms and Consequences (eds Woiwood, I. P. et al.) 159–181 (CABI, 2001).

  47. Carroll, S. P. & Loye, J. E. Specialization of Jadera species (Hemiptera: Rhopalidae) on the seeds of Sapindaceae (Sapindales) and revolutionary responses of defense and attack.Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am. 80, 373–378 (1987).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Brady, S. P. et al. Causes of maladaptation. Evol. Appl. 12, 1229–1242 (2019).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  49. Brady, S. P. et al. Understanding maladaptation by uniting ecological and evolutionary perspectives. Am. Nat. 194, 495–515 (2019).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Ribeiro, S. T. Group effects and aposematism in Jadera haematoloma (Hemiptera: Rhopalidae). Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am. 82, 466–475 (1989).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Fawcett, M. M. et al. Manipulation of insulin signaling phenocopies evolution of a host-associated polyphenism. Nat. Commun. 9, 1699 (2018).

  52. Angelini, D. R., Steele, J. L., Yorsz, M. C. & O’Brien, D. M. Expression analysis in a dispersal–fecundity polyphenism identifies growth regulators and effectors. Integr. Comp. Biol. 62, 1042–1055 (2022).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  53. Carroll, S. P., Marler, M., Winchell, R. & Dingle, H. Evolution of cryptic flight morph and life history differences during host race radiation in the soapberry bug, Jadera haematoloma Herrich-Schaeffer (Hemiptera: Rhopalidae). Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am. 96, 135–143 (2003).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  54. Comerford, S. M., Carroll, S. P. & Egan, S. P. Test of divergence in adaptive phenotypes in the newly discovered host association of the red-shouldered soapberry bug (Jadera haematoloma (Hemiptera: Rhopalidae)) on Mexican buckeye (Ungnadia speciosa (Sapindaceae)). Entomol. Exp. Appl. 170, 64–78 (2022).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  55. Tanaka, S. & Wolda, H. Seasonal wing length dimorphism in a tropical seed bug: ecological significance of the short-winged form. Oecologia 73, 559–565 (1987).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. Merilä, J. & Hendry, A. P. Climate change, adaptation and phenotypic plasticity: the problem and the evidence. Evol. Appl. 7, 1–14 (2014).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  57. Kuussaari, M., Singer, M. & Hanski, I. Local specialization and landscape‐level influence on host use in an herbivorous insect. Ecology 81, 2177–2187 (2000).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  58. Hanski, I., Saastamoinen, M. & Ovaskainen, O. Dispersal‐related life‐history trade‐offs in a butterfly metapopulation. J. Anim. Ecol. 75, 91–100 (2006).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  59. Nurmi, T. & Parvinen, K. On the evolution of specialization with a mechanistic underpinning in structured metapopulations. Theor. Popul. Biol. 73, 222–243 (2008).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  60. Shine, R., Brown, G. P. & Phillips, B. L. Reply to Lee: Spatial sorting, assortative mating and natural selection. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 108, E348–E348 (2011).

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  61. Oke, K. et al. Recent declines in salmon body size impact ecosystems and fisheries. Nat. Commun. 11, 4155 (2020).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  62. Conrad, K. F., Woiwod, I. P., Parsons, M., Fox, R. & Warren, M. S. Long-term population trends in widespread British moths. J. Insect Conserv. 8, 119–136 (2004).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  63. Hallmann, C. A. et al. More than 75 percent decline over 27 years in total flying insect biomass in protected areas. PLoS ONE 12, e0185809 (2017).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  64. Macgregor, C. J., Williams, J. H., Bell, J. R. & Thomas, C. D. Moth biomass has fluctuated over 50 years in Britain but lacks a clear trend. Nat. Ecol. Evol. 3, 1645–1649 (2019).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  65. Bolnick, D. I. et al. Phenotype‐dependent native habitat preference facilitates divergence between parapatric lake and stream stickleback. Evolution 63, 2004–2016 (2009).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  66. Jaenike, J. & Holt, R. D. Genetic variation for habitat preference: evidence and explanations. Am. Nat. 137, S67–S90 (1991).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  67. Berggren, H., Tinnert, J. & Forsman, A. Spatial sorting may explain evolutionary dynamics of wing polymorphism in pygmy grasshoppers. J. Evol. Biol. 25, 2126–2138 (2012).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  68. Brown, G. P., Phillips, B. L. & Shine, R. The straight and narrow path: the evolution of straight-line dispersal at a cane toad invasion front. Proc. R. Soc. B 281, 20141385 (2014).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  69. Chan, M. H., Shine, R., Brown, G. P. & Kim, P. S. Mathematical modelling of spatial sorting and evolution in a host–parasite system. J. Theor. Biol. 380, 530–541 (2015).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  70. Hanski, I., Breuker, C. J., Schöps, K., Setchfield, R. & Nieminen, M. Population history and life history influence the migration rate of female Glanville fritillary butterflies. Oikos 98, 87–97 (2002).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  71. Cobben, M. et al. Spatial sorting and range shifts: consequences for evolutionary potential and genetic signature of a dispersal trait. J. Theor. Biol. 373, 92–99 (2015).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  72. Mukherjee, F. & Singh, D. Detecting flood prone areas in Harris County: a GIS based analysis. GeoJournal 85, 647–663 (2020).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  73. Cenzer, M. L. Adaptation to an invasive host is driving the loss of a native ecotype. Evolution 70, 2296–2307 (2016).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  74. Misuri, A., Moreno, V. C., Quddus, N. & Cozzani, V. Lessons learnt from the impact of hurricane Harvey on the chemical and process industry. Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 190, 106521 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  75. van Oldenborgh, G. J. et al. Attribution of extreme rainfall from Hurricane Harvey, August 2017. Environ. Res. Lett. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/aa9ef2 (2017).

  76. Emanuel, K. Assessing the present and future probability of Hurricane Harvey’s rainfall. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 114, 12681–12684 (2017).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  77. Zhang, W., Villarini, G., Vecchi, G. A. & Smith, J. A. Urbanization exacerbated the rainfall and flooding caused by hurricane Harvey in Houston. Nature 563, 384–388 (2018).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  78. Risser, M. D. & Wehner, M. F. Attributable human‐induced changes in the likelihood and magnitude of the observed extreme precipitation during Hurricane Harvey. Geophys. Res. Lett. https://doi.org/10.1002/2017gl075888 (2017).

  79. Liscum, F. Effects of Urban Development on Stormwater Runoff Characteristics for the Houston, Texas, Metropolitan Area (US Department of the Interior, US Geological Survey, 2001).

  80. Miller, M. M. & Shirzaei, M. Land subsidence in Houston correlated with flooding from Hurricane Harvey. Remote Sens. Environ. 225, 368–378 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  81. Sauter, R. & Held, L. Quasi-complete separation in random effects of binary response mixed models. J. Stat. Comput. Simul. 86, 2781–2796 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  82. Chung, Y., Rabe-Hesketh, S., Dorie, V., Gelman, A. & Liu, J. A nondegenerate penalized likelihood estimator for variance parameters in multilevel models. Psychometrika 78, 685–709 (2013).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We acknowledge funding by the American Museum of Natural History’s Teddy Roosevelt grant to M.S.C., the American Philosophical Society’s Lewis and Clark Explorer grant and the Society for the Study of Evolution’s Small Grants for Local and Regional Outreach and funding to S.P.E. and S.P.C. from the National Science Foundation (award no. 1802715). We thank NSF programme officer G. Gilchrist for his critical feedback during the planning stages of this RAPID funded project. We thank J. Pawell for her integral role in insect field collections along with M. Comerford, R. LaRoche, L. Zhang and K. Gonzalez. In addition, we thank C. Boschert, K. Zhu, B. Ma and L. Ivanov for their contribution in measuring insect morphology. We would also like to extend a special thank you to C. Klein and her autumn 2018 Environmental Science class at Westside High School in Houston ISD for granting us access to Wolf Prairie and for their participation in this research. Artwork of insects interacting with host seed pods was done by T. M. Fowels.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of BioSciences, Rice University, Houston, TX, USA

    Mattheau S. Comerford, Tatum M. La & Scott P. Egan

  2. Clements High School, Sugar Land, TX, USA

    Tatum M. La

  3. Department of Entomology & Nematology, University of California, Davis, CA, USA

    Scott Carroll

Authors
  1. Mattheau S. Comerford
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Tatum M. La
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Scott Carroll
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Scott P. Egan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

The focus of this paper was conceived by M.S.C., S.C. and S.P.E. Data collection was performed by M.S.C. and T.M.L. with analysis by M.S.C. Writing was shared by M.S.C. and S.P.E. with feedback from S.C. and T.M.L.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mattheau S. Comerford.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Peer review

Peer review information

Nature Ecology & Evolution thanks Meredith Cenzer and the other, anonymous, reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Extended data

Extended Data Fig. 1 Map of sample sites in this study.

Map of soapberry bug sample sites by host association across Houston, Texas, U.S.A., from 2017 to 2020. Open circles denote unflooded control sites and filled circles denote flooded site locations. Host association is depicted by colour: Koelreuteria (blue), Sapindus (orange) and Cardiospermum (green). For corresponding latitude and longitude of each sample site location see Supplementary Table 1.

Extended Data Fig. 2 Wing and beak lengths across multiple generations.

Boxplot showing soapberry bug wing and beak lengths across multiple generations of Koelreuteria-associated brachypterous females. Panel (a) is a generational comparison of insect wing length between flooded (dark blue) and unflooded control sites (light blue). Model selection using linear mixed models (LMM) suggests that forewing lengths were longer at flooded sites in the three generations that followed recolonization (LMM: F(3, 205.1) = 10.80, P < 0.001; Supplementary Table 5). Panel (b) is a generational comparison of insect beak length between flooded (dark blue) and unflooded control sites (light blue). Model selection using LMM suggests that beak lengths were longer at flooded sites in the three generations that followed recolonization (LMM: F(3, 202.6) = 27.44, P < 0.001; Supplementary Table 14). In both panels, the red dashed line corresponds to Hurricane Harvey. Each ‘generation’ represents a 60-day block of time, which is equivalent to the maximum adult lifespan of a soapberry bug50. The upper and lower edges of the box indicate the first and third quartile, the midline indicates the median value and the whiskers show the 95% confidence intervals with dots as outliers. Sample sizes in grey within panels. Boxes capped with different letters are significantly different (Tukey’s test: P < 0.05, see Supplementary Tables 15, 22). There were no brachypterous insects present during initial colonization, so a boxplot for flooded post-hurricane insects was not included in either panel.

Extended Data Fig. 3 Pre-hurricane regional patterns of soapberry bug beak length.

Boxplot summarizing regional patterns of beak length in soapberry bugs sampled before the hurricane separated by sex (male and female) and wing form (macropterous insects in orange and brachypterous insects in blue). Model selection using linear mixed models suggests that females have longer beaks than males and macropterous individuals have longer beaks than brachypterous individuals (LMM: F(1, 1079.) = 18.286, P < 0.001; Supplementary Table 6) The upper and lower edges of each box indicate the first and third quartile, the midline indicates the median value and the whiskers show the 95% confidences intervals with dots as outliers. Box plots labelled with different letters are significantly different (Tukey’s test: P < 0.01, see Supplementary Table 23). Sample sizes provided in grey below each boxplot.

Extended Data Fig. 4 Soapberry bug beak length before and after hurricane.

Line plots illustrating hurricane-associated beak length changes of soapberry bugs at flooded (left) and control sites (right). Insect beak lengths are compared pre- and post-hurricane with the pink column in the middle marking the timing of Hurricane Harvey. Each coloured line represents an individual sampling site. The colour of each line represents the host association with Cardiospermum (green), Sapindus (orange) and Koelreuteria (blue). Box plots on left (pre-hurricane) and right (post-hurricane) illustrate the overall median, first and third quartile, 95% confidence intervals and outliers. Bars with asterisk indicate levels of significance per two-tailed Welch’s test with (*) <0.05 and (***) <0.001, with test statistics provided at the top of each panel. Sample sizes in grey. Plots are aligned by horizontally by sex and wing form to account for previously demonstrated dimorphic differences in beak length (see Extended Data Fig. 3).

Extended Data Fig. 5 Host plant-associated beak length before hurricane.

Boxplot of host-associated beak lengths from soapberry bugs collected before the hurricane. Insect beak lengths are compared between host association denoted by colour with Cardiospermum (green), Koelreuteria (blue) and Sapindus (orange) and separated by sex (females – top; males – bottom) and wing form (macropterous – left; brachypterous – right; see Extended Data Fig. 3). Model selection using linear mixed models suggest that sex, wing form and host association are all important predictors of insect beak length (LMM: F (2, 1079) = 2.88, P = 0.057; Supplementary Table 16). The upper and lower boxes indicate the first and third quartile, the midline indicates the median value and the whiskers show the 95% confidence intervals with dots as outliers. Boxes labelled with different letters are significantly different (Tukey’s test: P < 0.05, see Supplementary Table 17). Sample sizes in grey within panels.

Extended Data Fig. 6 Beak length before and after hurricane for macropterous soapberry bugs.

Boxplot of spatial sorting’s effect on eroding a history of natural selection driven host-associated beak length differentiation in macropterous soapberry bugs. Divergent host-associated beak lengths (s ee Extended Data Fig. 5) are compared pre- (white) versus post-hurricane (purple). Insect host association is denoted by images of the insect feeding on each of their given host plants: Cardiospermum (green), Koelreuteria (red) and Sapindus (orange). Model selection using linear mixed models found the three-way interaction to be significant (LMM: F(1, 518.5) = 22.88, P < 0.001; Supplementary Table 24), however, a post hoc Tukey’s test suggests that host-associated beak lengths where no longer significantly different post-hurricane at the flooded sites (Tukey: P > 0.1). All Sapindus-associated sites flooded during the hurricane, so none were available in controls. Plots are aligned vertically by site condition with flooded sites on the left and unflooded control sites on the right. Plots are aligned horizontally by sex with females on the top and males on the bottom. The upper and lower edge of box plots indicate the first and third quartile, the midline indicates the median value and the whiskers show the 95% confidences intervals with dots as outliers. Boxes labelled with different letters are significantly different (Tukey’s test: P < 0.05). Sample sizes in grey included in panels.

Extended Data Fig. 7 Beak length before and after hurricane for brachypterous soapberry bugs.

Boxplot of spatial sorting’s effect on eroding a history of natural selection driven host-associated beak length differentiation in brachypterous soapberry bugs. Divergent host-associated beak lengths (See Extended Data Fig. 5) are compared pre- (white) versus post-hurricane (light blue). Insect host association is denoted by images of the insect feeding on each of their given host plants: Cardiospermum (green), Koelreuteria (red) and Sapindus (orange). Model selection using linear models found the three-way interaction to be significant (LM: F(1, 509) = 4.12, P = 0.04; Supplementary Table 25), however, post hoc Tukey’s test suggests that that host-associated differences between beak lengths are no longer significant at flooded sites post-hurricane (Tukey: P > 0.1). All Sapindus-associated sites flooded during the hurricane, so none were available in controls. Plots are aligned vertically by site condition with flooded sites on the left and unflooded control sites on the right. Plots are aligned horizontally by sex with females on the top and males on the bottom. The upper and lower edge of box plots indicate the first and third quartile, the midline indicates the median value and the whiskers show the 95% confidence intervals with dots as outliers. Boxes labelled with different letters are significantly different (Tukey’s test: P < 0.05). Sample sizes in grey included in panels.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Information

Supplementary Results and Tables 1–25.

Reporting Summary

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Comerford, M.S., La, T.M., Carroll, S. et al. Spatial sorting promotes rapid (mal)adaptation in the red-shouldered soapberry bug after hurricane-driven local extinctions. Nat Ecol Evol 7, 1856–1868 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41559-023-02205-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41559-023-02205-7

This article is cited by

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing