Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Comment
  • Published:

Better integration of chemical pollution research will further our understanding of biodiversity loss

Chemical pollution research should be better integrated with other drivers of biodiversity loss and the assessment of human impacts on ecosystems, to more effectively guide management strategies for biodiversity loss mitigation.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Relevant articles

Open Access articles citing this article.

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Fig. 1: Chemical pollution research is isolated from the ecological literature.

Data availability

All data are publicly available from the sources cited in the Supplementary Information. Source data are provided with this paper.

References

  1. Tollefson, J. Nature 569, 171 (2019).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Johnson, C. N. et al. Science 356, 270–275 (2017).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Persson, L. et al. Environ. Sci. Technol. 56, 1510–1521 (2022).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. IPBES. Global Assessment Report on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services: Summary for Policymakers (IPBES secretariat, 2019).

  5. Grier, J. W. Science 218, 1232–1235 (1982).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Oaks, J. L. et al. Nature 427, 630–633 (2004).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Bernhardt, E. S., Rosi, E. J. & Gessner, M. O. Front. Ecol. Environ. 15, 84–90 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Wang, Z., Walker, G. W., Muir, D. C. G. & Nagatani-Yoshida, K. Environ. Sci. Technol. 54, 2575–2584 (2020).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Carson, R. Silent Spring (Houghton Mifflin, 1962).

  10. Köhler, H. R. & Triebskorn, R. Science 341, 759–765 (2013).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Sigmund, G. et al. Science 376, 1280 (2022).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Groh, K., Vom Berg, C., Schirmer, K. & Tlili, A. Environ. Sci. Technol. 56, 707–710 (2022).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Sigmund, G. et al. Glob. Change Biol. 29, 3240–3255 (2023).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Schuijt, L. M., Peng, F. J., van den Berg, S. J. P., Dingemans, M. M. L. & Van den Brink, P. J. Sci. Total Environ. 795, 148776 (2021).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Brack, W. et al. Environ. Sci. Eur. 31, 62 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Brack, W. et al. Environ. Sci. Eur. 31, 10 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Medina, M. H., Correa, J. A. & Barata, C. Chemosphere 67, 2105–2114 (2007).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Blowes, S. A. et al. Science 366, 339–345 (2019).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. van den Brink, P. J., Roelsma, J., Van Nes, E. H., Scheffer, M. & Brock, T. C. M. Environ. Toxicol. Chem. 21, 2500–2506 (2002).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Senf, C. Ecosystems 25, 1719–1737 (2022).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Carraro, L., Mächler, E., Wüthrich, R. & Altermatt, F. Nat. Commun. 11, 3585 (2020).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Ågerstrand, M. et al. Environ. Sci. Technol. 57, 2205–2208 (2023).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. UNEP CBD (Convention on Biological Diversity). COP15: final text of Kunming-Montreal Global Biodiversity Framework. cbd.int, https://www.cbd.int/article/cop15-final-text-kunming-montreal-gbf-221222 (22 December 2022).

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors have been supported by the RobustNature Excellence Initiative (internal prefunding of the Goethe University Frankfurt).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

F. Sylvester, F.G.W. and H.H. conceived this work. F. Sylvester, V.L.L. and F.G.W. conducted the literature searches and data analyses with the help of S.F., K.J.G., J.J., S.J., F.L., R.O., J.P., M.P., S.S., M.S.-S. and F. Strobl. Writing was led by F. Sylvester with extensive input from H.H. Substantial contributions to writing and the direction of the manuscript were made by K.J.G., K.T., M.S., W.B. and J.J. Figures had substantial input from L.M.S., F.G.W, V.L.L., M.S.-S. and F. Sylvester. All other authors (M.B., L.B., C.B., B.B., J.C., P. Dierkes, P. Döll, I.E., E.J.N.H., T.H., S.K., H.K., D.M., T.M., J.O., S.U.P., G.J.S., J.F.S., A. Schlottmann, F. Schneider., E.S., F. Strobl, A. Sundermann, T.T., A.V., C.V. and R.W.) contributed to specific aspects and to further elaborate the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Henner Hollert.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Information

Supplementary Methods.

Supplementary Data 1

Random papers reviewed to assess to what extent the Scopus searches conducted yielded papers on the topics targeted by the present study. We examined 100 papers for each of the five topics assessed (500 papers examined in total): chem, chemical pollution; cc, climate change; land, habitat degradation and loss caused by changes in land and water use; nis, invasion by non-native species; and bio, biodiversity loss.

Supplementary Data 2

Number of published papers per year retrieved by Scopus searches (1990-2021) on five assessed topics: chemical pollution (chem), climate change (cc), habitat degradation and loss caused by changes in land and water use (land), invasion by non-native species (nis), and biodiversity loss (bio).

Supplementary Data 3

Number of published papers per journal retrieved by Scopus searches (1990-2021) on five assessed topics: chemical pollution (chem), climate change (cc), habitat degradation and loss caused by changes in land and water use (land), invasion by non-native species (nis), and biodiversity loss (bio). The journals are ranked in decreasing order of paper contribution, and the tables show the first 158 journals with the largest contribution in each topic.

Source data

Source Data Fig. 1

The most productive journals, accounting for 50% of the papers published on five topics: chemical pollution (chem), climate change (cc), habitat degradation and loss caused by changes in land and water use (land), invasion by non-native species (nis), and biodiversity loss (bio) searched in Scopus between 1990 and 2021. These journals are a subset of 119 journals out of a total of 367 identified journals. The Scopus sub-subject area information is provided for each of the 119 journals.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Sylvester, F., Weichert, F.G., Lozano, V.L. et al. Better integration of chemical pollution research will further our understanding of biodiversity loss. Nat Ecol Evol 7, 1552–1555 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41559-023-02117-6

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41559-023-02117-6

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing Anthropocene

Sign up for the Nature Briefing: Anthropocene newsletter — what matters in anthropocene research, free to your inbox weekly.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing: Anthropocene