Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Article
  • Published:

Ecological network complexity scales with area

Nature Ecology & Evolution volume 6, pages 307–314 (2022)Cite this article

Subjects

Abstract

Larger geographical areas contain more species—an observation raised to a law in ecology. Less explored is whether biodiversity changes are accompanied by a modification of interaction networks. We use data from 32 spatial interaction networks from different ecosystems to analyse how network structure changes with area. We find that basic community structure descriptors (number of species, links and links per species) increase with area following a power law. Yet, the distribution of links per species varies little with area, indicating that the fundamental organization of interactions within networks is conserved. Our null model analyses suggest that the spatial scaling of network structure is determined by factors beyond species richness and the number of links. We demonstrate that biodiversity–area relationships can be extended from species counts to higher levels of network complexity. Therefore, the consequences of anthropogenic habitat destruction may extend from species loss to wider simplification of natural communities.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

  • Purchase on Springer Link
  • Instant access to full article PDF
Buy now

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Fig. 1: Spatial scaling of network complexity.
Fig. 2: Scaling of the number of links with species richness.
Fig. 3: Spatial scaling of mean indegree and network degree distribution.

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

All datasets analysed during the current study are available online at https://doi.org/10.5061/dryad.zcrjdfndg66, https://github.com/nuriagaliana/Ecological-network-complexity-scales-with-area or https://github.com/mlurgi/global-network-area.

Code availability

Custom code used to perform the analyses are available online at https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5758580, https://github.com/nuriagaliana/Ecological-network-complexity-scales-with-area or https://github.com/mlurgi/global-network-area.

References

  1. Arrhenius, O. Species and area. J. Ecol. 9, 95–99 (1921).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. MacArthur, R. H. & Wilson, E. O. The Theory of Island Biogeography (Princeton Univ. Press, 1967).

  3. Rosenzweig, M. L. Species Diversity in Space and Time (Cambridge Univ. Press, 1995).

  4. Smith, A. B., Sandel, B., Kraft, N. J. B. & Carey, S. Characterizing scale‐dependent community assembly using the functional‐diversity–area relationship. Ecology 94, 2392–2402 (2013).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Mazel, F. et al. Multifaceted diversity–area relationships reveal global hotspots of mammalian species, trait and lineage diversity. Glob. Ecol. Biogeogr. 23, 836–847 (2014).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Dias, R. A. et al. Species richness and patterns of overdispersion, clustering and randomness shape phylogenetic and functional diversity–area relationships in habitat islands. J. Biogeogr. 47, 1638–1648 (2020).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Pereira, H. M. et al. Scenarios for global biodiversity in the 21st century. Science 330, 1496–1501 (2010).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Pimm, S. L., Russell, G. J., Gittleman, J. L. & Brooks, T. M. The future of biodiversity. Science 269, 347–350 (1995).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Simberloff, D. in Tropical Deforestation and Species Extinction (eds Whitmore, T. C. & Sayer, J. A.) 75–89 (Chapman & Hall, 1992).

  10. Jordano, P. Chasing ecological interactions. PLoS Biol. 14, e1002559 (2016).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Montoya, J. M., Woodward, G., Emmerson, M. C. & Solé, R. V. Press perturbations and indirect effects in real food webs. Ecology 90, 2426–2433 (2009).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Lurgi, M., López, B. C., Montoya, J. M. & Lopez, B. C. Novel communities from climate change. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B 367, 2913–2922 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Tylianakis, J. M., Tscharntke, T. & Lewis, O. T. Habitat modification alters the structure of tropical host–parasitoid food webs. Nature 445, 202–205 (2007).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Montoya, J. M., Rodriguez, M. Á. & Hawkins, B. A. Food web complexity and higher-level ecosystem services. Ecol. Lett. 6, 587–593 (2003).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Reiss, J., Bridle, J. R., Montoya, J. M. & Woodward, G. Emerging horizons in biodiversity and ecosystem functioning research. Trends Ecol. Evol. 24, 505–514 (2009).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Thompson, R. M. et al. Food webs: reconciling the structure and function of biodiversity. Trends Ecol. Evol. 27, 689–697 (2012).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Cohen, J. E. & Newman, C. M. Community area and food-chain length: theoretical predictions. Am. Nat. 138, 1542–1554 (1991).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Schoener, T. W. Food webs from the small to the large: the Robert H. MacArthur Award lecture. Ecology 70, 1559–1589 (1989).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Post, D. M., Pace, M. L. & Hairston, N. G. Ecosystem size determines food-chain length in lakes. Nature 405, 1047–1049 (2000).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Brose, U., Ostling, A., Harrison, K. & Martinez, N. D. Unified spatial scaling of species and their trophic interactions. Nature 428, 167–171 (2004).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Galiana, N. et al. The spatial scaling of species interaction networks. Nat. Ecol. Evol. 2, 782–790 (2018).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Wood, S. A., Russell, R., Hanson, D., Williams, R. J. & Dunne, J. A. Effects of spatial scale of sampling on food web structure. Ecol. Evol. 5, 3769–3782 (2015).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Pimm, S. L. et al. Food web patterns and their consequences. Nature 350, 669–674 (1991).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Martinez, N. D. Constant connectance in community food webs. Am. Nat. 139, 1208–1218 (1992).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Ings, T. C. et al. Ecological networks–beyond food webs. J. Anim. Ecol. 78, 253–69 (2009).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Montoya, J. M. & Solé, R. V. Topological properties of food webs: from real data to community assembly models. Oikos 102, 614–622 (2003).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Drakare, S., Lennon, J. J. & Hillebrand, H. The imprint of the geographical, evolutionary and ecological context on species–area relationships. Ecol. Lett. 9, 215–227 (2006).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Preston, F. W. Time and space and the variation of species. Ecology 41, 611–627 (1960).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Turner, W. R. & Tjørve, E. Scale-dependence in species–area relationships. Ecography 6, 721–730 (2005).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Bengtsson, J. Confounding variables and independent observations in comparative analyses of food webs. Ecology 75, 1282–1288 (1994).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Vermaat, J. E., Dunne, J. A. & Gilbert, A. J. Major dimensions in food-web structure properties. Ecology 90, 278–282 (2009).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Dunne, J. A. et al. Parasites affect food web structure primarily through increased diversity and complexity. PLoS Biol. 11, e1001579 (2013).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  33. Poisot, T. & Gravel, D. When is an ecological network complex? Connectance drives degree distribution and emerging network properties. PeerJ 2, e251 (2014).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  34. Cohen, J. E. & Briand, Fredeiri Trophic links of community food webs. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 81, 4105–4109 (1984).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  35. Roslin, T., Várkonyi, G., Koponen, M., Vikberg, V. & Nieminen, M. Species–area relationships across four trophic levels—decreasing island size truncates food chains. Ecography 37, 443–453 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  36. Holt, R. D., Lawton, J. H., Polis, G. A. & Martinez, N. D. Trophic rank and the species–area relationship. Ecology 80, 1495–1504 (1999).

    Google Scholar 

  37. Dunne, J. A., Williams, R. J. & Martinez, N. D. Food-web structure and network theory: the role of connectance and size. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 99, 12917–12922 (2002).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  38. Montoya, J. M., Pimm, S. L. & Solé, R. V. Ecological networks and their fragility. Nature 442, 259–264 (2006).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. James, A., Pitchford, J. W. & Plank, M. J. Disentangling nestedness from models of ecological complexity. Nature 487, 227–230 (2012).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Valverde, S. et al. The architecture of mutualistic networks as an evolutionary spandrel. Nat. Ecol. Evol. 2, 94–99 (2018).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Valiente-Banuet, A. et al. Beyond species loss: the extinction of ecological interactions in a changing world. Funct. Ecol. 29, 299–307 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Janzen, D. H. The deflowering of central America. Nat. Hist. 83, 49–53 (1974).

  43. Mendoza, M. & Araújo, M. B. Climate shapes mammal community trophic structures and humans simplify them. Nat. Commun. 10, 5197 (2019).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  44. Emer, C. et al. Seed dispersal networks in tropical forest fragments: area effects, remnant species, and interaction diversity. Biotropica 52, 81–89 (2020).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. McWilliams, C., Lurgi, M., Montoya, J. M., Sauve, A. & Montoya, D. The stability of multitrophic communities under habitat loss. Nat. Commun. 10, 2322 (2019).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  46. McCann, K. S. The diversity–stability debate. Nature 405, 228–233 (2000).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Fig, T., Mccann, K., Hastings, A. & Huxel, G. R. Weak trophic interactions and the balance of nature. Nature 395, 794–798 (1998).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Pimm, S. L. & Lawton, J. H. Are food webs divided into compartments? J. Anim. Ecol. 49, 879–898 (1980).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Macfadyen, S., Gibson, R. H., Symondson, W. O. C. & Memmott, J. Landscape structure influences modularity patterns in farm food webs: consequences for pest control. Ecol. Appl. 21, 516–524 (2011).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  50. Reverté, S. et al. Spatial variability in a plant–pollinator community across a continuous habitat: high heterogeneity in the face of apparent uniformity. Ecography 42, 1558–1568 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Torné‐Noguera, A., Arnan, X., Rodrigo, A. & Bosch, J. Spatial variability of hosts, parasitoids and their interactions across a homogeneous landscape. Ecol. Evol. 10, 3696–3705 (2020).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  52. Hernández‐Castellano, C. et al. A new native plant in the neighborhood: effects on plant–pollinator networks, pollination, and plant reproductive success. Ecology 101, e03046 (2020).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Osorio, S., Arnan, X., Bassols, E., Vicens, N. & Bosch, J. Local and landscape effects in a host–parasitoid interaction network along a forest–cropland gradient. Ecol. Appl. 25, 1869–1879 (2015).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Kaartinen, R. & Roslin, T. Shrinking by numbers: landscape context affects the species composition but not the quantitative structure of local food webs. J. Anim. Ecol. 80, 622–631 (2011).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. Vázquez, D. P. & Simberloff, D. Changes in interaction biodiversity induced by an introduced ungulate. Ecol. Lett. 6, 1077–1083 (2003).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  56. Mulder, C., Den Hollander, H. A. & Hendriks, A. J. Aboveground herbivory shapes the biomass distribution and flux of soil invertebrates. PLoS ONE 3, e3573 (2008).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  57. Montoya, D., Yallop, M. L. & Memmott, J. Functional group diversity increases with modularity in complex food webs. Nat. Commun. 6, 7379 (2015).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  58. Grass, I., Jauker, B., Steffan-Dewenter, I., Tscharntke, T. & Jauker, F. Past and potential future effects of habitat fragmentation on structure and stability of plant–pollinator and host–parasitoid networks. Nat. Ecol. Evol. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41559-018-0631-2 (2018).

  59. Cagnolo, L., Salvo, A. & Valladares, G. Network topology: patterns and mechanisms in plant–herbivore and host–parasitoid food webs. J. Anim. Ecol. 80, 342–351 (2011).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  60. Maiorano, L., Montemaggiori, A., Ficetola, G. F., O’Connor, L. & Thuiller, W. TETRA‐EU 1.0: a species‐level trophic metaweb of European tetrapods. Glob. Ecol. Biogeogr. 29, 1452–1457 (2020).

  61. Kopelke, J. et al. Food‐web structure of willow‐galling sawflies and their natural enemies across Europe. Ecology 98, 1730 (2017).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  62. Sole, R. V. & Montoya, M. Complexity and fragility in ecological networks. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 268, 2039–2045 (2001).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  63. Broido, A. D. & Clauset, A. Scale-free networks are rare. Nat. Commun. 10, 1017 (2019).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  64. Guilhaumon, F., Mouillot, D. & Gimenez, O. mmSAR: an R-package for multimodel species–area relationship inference. Ecography 33, 420–424 (2010).

    Google Scholar 

  65. Matthews, T. J., Triantis, K. A., Whittaker, R. J. & Guilhaumon, F. sars: an R package for fitting, evaluating and comparing species–area relationship models. Ecography https://doi.org/10.1111/ecog.04271 (2019).

  66. Galiana, N. Ecological network complexity scales with area. Dryad https://doi.org/10.5061/dryad.zcrjdfndg (2021).

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank J.-F. Arnoldi, M. Barbier and Y. Zelnik for numerous discussions that improved the quality of this paper. This work was supported by the TULIP Laboratory of Excellence (ANR-10-LABX-41 and 394 ANR-11-IDEX-002-02) to J.M.M., by a Region Midi-Pyrenees project (CNRS 121090) to J.M.M., and by the FRAGCLIM Consolidator Grant (726176) to J.M.M. from the European Research Council under the European Union’s Horizon 2020 Research and Innovation Program. The study was also supported by Spanish MICINN projects CGL2009-12646, CSD2008-0040 and CGL2013-41856 to J.B. and A.R. C.E. was funded through the São Paulo Research Foundation (FAPESP 2015/15172-7). V.A.G.B. was funded by National Funds through FCT—Foundation for Science and Technology under the Project UIDB/05183/2020. W.T. received funding from the ERA-Net BiodivERsA—Belmont Forum, with the national funder Agence National pour la Recherche (FutureWeb: ANR-18-EBI4–0009 and BearConnect: ANR-16-EBI3-0003).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Centre for Biodiversity Theory and Modelling, Theoretical and Experimental Ecology Station, CNRS, Moulis, France

    Núria Galiana, Miguel Lurgi, Vinicius A. G. Bastazini, Daniel Montoya & José M. Montoya

  2. Institut de Ciència i Tecnologia Ambientals, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain

    Núria Galiana

  3. Department of Biosciences, Swansea University, Singleton Park, UK

    Miguel Lurgi

  4. Mediterranean Institute for Agriculture, Environment and Development, University of Évora, Évora, Portugal

    Vinicius A. G. Bastazini

  5. CREAF, Bellaterra (Cerdanyola del Vallès), Catalonia, Spain

    Jordi Bosch, Bernat Claramunt-López, Carlos Hernández-Castellano, Sergio Osorio-Canadas, Sara Reverté & Anselm Rodrigo

  6. Institute for Multidisciplinary Plant Biology (IMBIV), Faculty of Exact, Physical and Natural Sciences, National University of Cordoba and CONICET, Córdoba, Argentina

    Luciano Cagnolo

  7. Department of Integrative Biology, University of Guelph, Guelph, Ontario, Canada

    Kevin Cazelles & Kevin McCann

  8. Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Bellaterra (Cerdanyola del Vallès), Catalonia, Spain

    Bernat Claramunt-López, Carlos Hernández-Castellano & Anselm Rodrigo

  9. Departament of Ecology, Institute of Bioscience, São Paulo State University (UNESP), CP 199, Rio Claro, Brazil

    Carine Emer

  10. Departament of Botany, University of Pernambuco (UFPE), CP 199, Recife, Brazil

    Carine Emer

  11. Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada

    Marie-Josée Fortin

  12. Ecology of Tropical Agricultural Systems, University of Hohenheim, Stuttgart, Germany

    Ingo Grass

  13. Department of Animal Ecology, Justus Liebig University Giessen, Giessen, Germany

    Frank Jauker

  14. Department of Biology, Memorial University of Newfoundland, St. John’s, Newfoundland and Labrador, Canada

    Shawn J. Leroux & Anne M. McLeod

  15. Basque Centre for Climate Change (BC3), Leioa, Spain

    Daniel Montoya

  16. IKERBASQUE, Basque Foundation for Science, Bilbao, Spain

    Daniel Montoya

  17. Department of Biological, Geological and Environmental Sciences, University of Catania, Catania, Italy

    Christian Mulder

  18. Departamento de Ecología de la Biodiversidad, Instituto de Ecología, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, México City, México

    Sergio Osorio-Canadas

  19. Department of Animal Ecology and Tropical Biology, Biocenter, University of Würzburg, Am Hubland, Würzburg, Germany

    Ingolf Steffan-Dewenter

  20. Global Change Research Group, Inst. Mediterrani d’Estudis Avançats (CSIC-UIB), Esporles, Spain

    Anna Traveset

  21. Evolution of Technology Laboratory, Institute of Evolutionary Biology, CSIC–Universitat Pompeu Fabra, Barcelona, Spain

    Sergi Valverde

  22. European Centre for Living Technology, Venice, Italy

    Sergi Valverde

  23. Argentine Institute for Dryland Research, CONICET and National University of Cuyo, Mendoza, Argentina

    Diego P. Vázquez

  24. Faculty of Exact and Natural Sciences, National University of Cuyo, Mendoza, Argentina

    Diego P. Vázquez

  25. eScience Institute, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA

    Spencer A. Wood

  26. Département de Biologie, Université de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, Quebec, Canada

    Dominique Gravel

  27. Department of Ecology, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Uppsala, Sweden

    Tomas Roslin

  28. Department of Agricultural Sciences, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland

    Tomas Roslin

  29. Univ. Grenoble Alpes, Univ. Savoie Mont Blanc, CNRS, LECA, Grenoble, France

    Wilfried Thuiller

Authors
  1. Núria Galiana
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Miguel Lurgi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Vinicius A. G. Bastazini
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Jordi Bosch
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Luciano Cagnolo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Kevin Cazelles
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Bernat Claramunt-López
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Carine Emer
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Marie-Josée Fortin
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  10. Ingo Grass
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  11. Carlos Hernández-Castellano
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  12. Frank Jauker
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  13. Shawn J. Leroux
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  14. Kevin McCann
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  15. Anne M. McLeod
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  16. Daniel Montoya
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  17. Christian Mulder
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  18. Sergio Osorio-Canadas
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  19. Sara Reverté
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  20. Anselm Rodrigo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  21. Ingolf Steffan-Dewenter
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  22. Anna Traveset
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  23. Sergi Valverde
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  24. Diego P. Vázquez
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  25. Spencer A. Wood
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  26. Dominique Gravel
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  27. Tomas Roslin
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  28. Wilfried Thuiller
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  29. José M. Montoya
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

N.G., J.M.M. and M.L. designed the research with contributions from all co-authors. N.G. and M.L. conducted research and analysed the data. J.B., L.C., B.C.-L., C.E., I.G., C.H.-C., F.J., D.M., C.M., S.O.-C., S.R., A.R., I.S.-D., A.T., D.P.V., S.A.W., T.R. and W.T. contributed the data. J.M.M., V.A.G.B., K.C., M.-J.F., S.J.L., K.M., A.M.M., D.G., T.R., S.V. and W.T. supported research. N.G. and J.M.M. wrote the manuscript with substantial contributions from D.G., T.R. and W.T. and feedback from all co-authors.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Núria Galiana.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Peer review information

Nature Ecology & Evolution thanks Jonathan Chase and the other, anonymous, reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Information

Supplementary Text 1, Tables 1–7 and Figs. 1–8.

Reporting Summary

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Galiana, N., Lurgi, M., Bastazini, V.A.G. et al. Ecological network complexity scales with area. Nat Ecol Evol 6, 307–314 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41559-021-01644-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41559-021-01644-4

This article is cited by

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing