Abstract
In addition to habitat loss and fragmentation, demographic processes—the vagaries of births, deaths and sex ratio fluctuations—pose substantial threats to wild giant panda populations. Additionally, climate change and plans for the Giant Panda National Park may influence (in opposing directions) the extinction risk for wild giant pandas. The Fourth National Giant Panda Census showed pandas living in 33 isolated populations. An estimated 259 animals live in 25 of these groups, ~14% of the total population. We used individual-based models to simulate time series of these small populations for 100 years. We analysed the spatial pattern of their risk of extinction under current conditions and multiple climate change models. Furthermore, we consider the impact of the proposed Giant Panda National Park. Results showed that 15 populations face a risk >90%, and for 3 other populations the risk is >50%. Of the 15 most at-risk populations, national parks can protect only 3. Under the Representative Concentration Pathway 8.5 climate change scenario, the 33 populations will probably further divide into 56 populations. Some 41 of them will face a risk >50% and 35 face a risk >90%. Although national parks will probably connect some fragmented habitats, 26 populations will be outside national park planning. Our study gives practical advice for conservation policies and management and has implications for the conservation of other species in the world that live in isolated, fragmented habitats.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Access options
Access Nature and 54 other Nature Portfolio journals
Get Nature+, our best-value online-access subscription
$29.99 / 30 days
cancel any time
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 12 digital issues and online access to articles
$119.00 per year
only $9.92 per issue
Buy this article
- Purchase on Springer Link
- Instant access to full article PDF
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
Similar content being viewed by others
Data availability
Data that support the findings of this study are available in the main text or the Supplementary Information.
Code availability
The main text describes the procedure flow of the individual-based algorithm. Code for running the model is available at https://github.com/konglingqiao/eco.
References
Tang, X. et al. Scheme design and main result analysis of the fourth national survey on giant pandas. For. Resour. Manag. 1, 11–16 (2015).
Swaisgood, R. R., Wang, D. & Wei, F. Panda downlisted but not out of the woods. Conserv. Lett. 11, 1 (2018).
Xu, W. et al. Reassessing the conservation status of the giant panda using remote sensing. Nat. Ecol. Evol. 1, 1635–1638 (2017).
Shen, G. et al. Climate change challenges the current conservation strategy for the giant panda. Biol. Conserv. 190, 43–50 (2015).
Tian, Z. et al. The next widespread bamboo flowering poses a massive risk to the giant panda. Biol. Conserv. 234, 180–187 (2019).
Lu, Z. et al. Patterns of genetic diversity in remaining giant panda populations. Conserv. Biol. 15, 1596–1607 (2001).
Pimm, S. L. The Balance of Nature (Univ. Chicago Press, 1991).
Pimm, S. L., Dollar, L. & Bass, O. L. Jr The genetic rescue of the Florida panther. Anim. Conserv. 9, 115–122 (2006).
Qing, J. et al. The minimum area requirements (MAR) for giant panda: an empirical study. Sci. Rep. 6, 37715 (2016).
Haddad, N. M. et al. Habitat fragmentation and its lasting impact on Earth’s ecosystems. Sci. Adv. 1, e1500052 (2015).
Fahrig, L. Relative effects of habitat loss and fragmentation on population extinction. J. Wildl. Manag. 61, 603–610 (1997).
Simberloff, D. Habitat fragmentation and population extinction of birds. IBIS 137, S105–S111 (1995).
Viña, A. et al. Range-wide analysis of wildlife habitat: implications for conservation. Biol. Conserv. 143, 1960–1969 (2010).
Wang, T., Ye, X., Skidmore, A. K. & Toxopeus, A. G. Characterising the spatial distribution of giant pandas (Ailuropoda melanoleuca) in fragmented forest landscapes. J. Biogeogr. 37, 865–878 (2010).
Xu, W. et al. Conservation of giant panda habitat in South Minshan, China, after the May 2008 earthquake. Front. Ecol. Environ. 7, 353–358 (2009).
Gong, M., Guan, T., Hou, M., Liu, G. & Zhou, T. Hopes and challenges for giant panda conservation under climate change in the Qinling Mountains of China. Ecol. Evol. 7, 596–605 (2017).
Songer, M., Delion, M., Biggs, A. & Huang, Q. Modeling impacts of climate change on giant panda habitat. Int. J. Ecol. 2012, 108752 (2012).
Tuanmu, M. N. et al. Climate-change impacts on understorey bamboo species and giant pandas in China’s Qinling Mountains. Nat. Clim. Change 3, 249–253 (2013).
He, K. et al. Effects of roads on giant panda distribution: a mountain range scale evaluation. Sci. Rep. 9, 1110 (2019).
Li, H. et al. Application of least-cost path model to identify a giant panda dispersal corridor network after the Wenchuan earthquake—case study of Wolong Nature Reserve in China. Ecol. Model. 221, 944–952 (2010).
Qi, D. et al. Quantifying landscape linkages among giant panda subpopulations in regional scale conservation. Integr. Zool. 7, 165–174 (2012).
Shen, G. et al. Proposed conservation landscape for giant pandas in the Minshan Mountains, China. Conserv. Biol. 22, 1144–1153 (2008).
Kong, L. et al. Habitat conservation redlines for the giant pandas in China. Biol. Conserv. 210, 83–88 (2017).
Zhang, J. et al. Natural recovery and restoration in giant panda habitat after the Wenchuan earthquake. Ecol. Manag. 319, 1–9 (2014).
Boyce, M. S. Population viability analysis. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 23, 481–497 (1992).
Possingham, H. in Conservation of Australia’s Forest Fauna (ed. Lunney, D.) Ch. 3, 35–40 (Royal Zoological Society of New South Wales, 1991).
Lacy, R. C. VORTEX: a computer simulation model for population viability analysis. Wildl. Res. 20, 45–65 (1993).
Wei, F., Fgeng, Z. & Hu, J. Population viability analysis computer model of giant panda population in Wuyipeng, Wolong Natural Reserve, China. Int. Conf. Bear. Res. Manag. 9, 19–23 (1997).
Guo, J., Chen, Y. & Hu, J. Population viability analysis of giant pandas in the Yele Nature Reserve. J. Nat. Conserv. 10, 35–40 (2002).
Jiang, H. & Hu, J. Population viability analysis for the Giant Panda in Baoxing County, Sichuan. Sichuan J. Zool. 29, 161–165 (2010).
Li, X., Li, D., Yong, Y. & Zhang, J. A preliminary analysis on population viability analysis for Giant Panda in Foping. Acta Zool. Sin. 43, 285–293 (1997).
Yang, Z., Hu, J. & Liu, N. The influence of dispersal on the metapopulation viability of Giant Panda (Aliuropoda melanoleuca) in the Minshan Mountains. Acta Zool. Acad. Sci. Hung. 53, 169–184 (2007).
Leslie, P. H. On the use of matrices in certain population mathematics. Biometrika 33, 183–212 (1945).
Carter, J., Ackleh, A. S., Leonard, B. P. & Wang, H. Giant panda (Ailuropoda melanoleuca) population dynamics and bamboo (subfamily Bambusoideae) life history: a structured population approach to examining carrying capacity when the prey are semelparous. Ecol. Model. 123, 207–223 (1999).
Xia, W. & Hu, J. On the trend of population dynamics in giant panda based on age structure. Acta Theriologica Sin. 9, 87–93 (1989).
Zhu, L. et al. Conservation implications of drastic reductions in the smallest and most isolated populations of giant pandas. Conserv. Biol. 24, 1299–1306 (2010).
State Forestry Administration P. R. C. Report of the Third National Giant Panda Census (Science Publishing House, 2006).
Zhu, L., Hu, Y., Zhang, Z. & Wei, F. Effect of China’s rapid development on its iconic giant panda. Chin. Sci. Bull. 58, 2134–2139 (2013).
Hu, J. Research on the Giant Panda (Shanghai Science and Technology Education Press, 2001).
Li, R. et al. Climate change threatens giant panda protection in the 21st century. Biol. Conserv. 182, 93–101 (2015).
Yang, B. et al. China’s collective forest tenure reform and the future of the giant panda. Conserv. Lett. 8, 251–261 (2015).
Linderman, M. et al. The effects of understory bamboo on broad-scale estimates of giant panda habitat. Biol. Conserv. 121, 383–390 (2005).
Yang, Z. et al. Reintroduction of the giant panda into the wild: a good start suggests a bright future. Biol. Conserv. 217, 181–186 (2018).
Kaiser, H. The dynamics of populations as result of the properties of individual animals. Fortschr. D. Zool. 25, 109–136 (1979).
Huston, M., DeAngelis, D. & Post, W. New computer models unify ecological theory. BioScience 38, 682–691 (1988).
DeAngelis, D. L. Individual-Based Models and Approaches In Ecology: Populations, Communities and Ecosystems (CRC Press, 2017)
Uchmański, J. & Grimm, V. Individual-based modelling in ecology: what makes the difference? Trends Ecol. Evol. 11, 437–441 (1996).
Wei, F. et al. A study on the life table of wild giant pandas. Acta Theriologica Sin. 9, 81–86 (1989).
Hou, W. Revision of the giant panda life table and related data indicators. Zool. Res. 21, 361–366 (2000).
Acknowledgements
Z.O. and L.K. received support from the Second Tibetan Plateau Scientific Expedition and Research Program (STEP) (grant no. 2019QZKK0308). W.X. received support from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (grant no. 31971542). Z.O. received support from Strategic Priority Research Program of the Chinese Academy of Sciences (grant no. XDA19050504). We thank the National Forestry and Grassland Administration (National Park Administration) for data support.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
L.K., Z.O., W.X. and S.L.P. designed the research. L.K., W.X., Y.X. and H.S. performed the research. L.K., W.X., Y.X. and H.S. analysed the data. L.K., Z.O., S.L.P., W.X. and Y.X. wrote the paper.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Peer review information Nature Ecology & Evolution thanks Zhi Lu and the other, anonymous, reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work.
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Extended data
Extended Data Fig. 1 Population dynamics of giant panda under optimal conditions.
Different initial age structures (youth majority structure, adult majority structure, old majority structure and the stable age structure) are used to simulate population trends for 100 years. There is a dramatic decline for the old majority structure. Regardless of the initial age structure, the population will grow slowly and steadily when the age structure becomes stable in the long run.
Extended Data Fig. 2 Uncertainty in Survival Probabilities (SP).
(1): Uncertainty in the SP of the individuals under one year old. (2)-(27): Uncertainty in the SP of the individuals aged 1 to 26.
Extended Data Fig. 3 Uncertainty analysis of Reproductive Probabilities (RP).
(1)-(17): Uncertainty in the RP of the individuals aged 5 to 21.
Extended Data Fig. 4 Uncertainty Analysis of initial age structure.
Extinction probabilities of populations with different numbers of individuals under different initial age structures.
Extended Data Fig. 5 Extinction possibility (%) of each population.
Cells filled with colour show the extinction possibilities under different scenarios. S1: Business as usual; S2: RCP2.6; S3: RCP4.5; S4: RCP 8.5; S5: Giant Panda National Park; S6~S8: (RCP2.6, RCP4.5, RCP 8.5) & Giant Panda National Park. The darker the red, the higher the extinction possibility, and the darker the blue, the lower the extinction possibility. The second column corresponds to the current giant panda populations in Fig. 1 in the main text.
Extended Data Fig. 6 Procedure flow of extinction risk simulation of giant panda populations.
(1.1) Individual assignment; (1.2) Reproduction simulation; (1.3) Judgement of survival.
Supplementary information
Supplementary Information
Supplementary Tables 1–5.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Kong, L., Xu, W., Xiao, Y. et al. Spatial models of giant pandas under current and future conditions reveal extinction risks. Nat Ecol Evol 5, 1309–1316 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41559-021-01520-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41559-021-01520-1
This article is cited by
-
Bio-inspired modelling as a practical tool to manage giant panda population dynamics in captivity
Natural Computing (2023)