Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Article
  • Published:

Spatial models of giant pandas under current and future conditions reveal extinction risks

Subjects

Abstract

In addition to habitat loss and fragmentation, demographic processes—the vagaries of births, deaths and sex ratio fluctuations—pose substantial threats to wild giant panda populations. Additionally, climate change and plans for the Giant Panda National Park may influence (in opposing directions) the extinction risk for wild giant pandas. The Fourth National Giant Panda Census showed pandas living in 33 isolated populations. An estimated 259 animals live in 25 of these groups, ~14% of the total population. We used individual-based models to simulate time series of these small populations for 100 years. We analysed the spatial pattern of their risk of extinction under current conditions and multiple climate change models. Furthermore, we consider the impact of the proposed Giant Panda National Park. Results showed that 15 populations face a risk >90%, and for 3 other populations the risk is >50%. Of the 15 most at-risk populations, national parks can protect only 3. Under the Representative Concentration Pathway 8.5 climate change scenario, the 33 populations will probably further divide into 56 populations. Some 41 of them will face a risk >50% and 35 face a risk >90%. Although national parks will probably connect some fragmented habitats, 26 populations will be outside national park planning. Our study gives practical advice for conservation policies and management and has implications for the conservation of other species in the world that live in isolated, fragmented habitats.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Fig. 1: The 33 isolated populations of giant pandas.
Fig. 2: Relationship between population size and the fraction of simulations going extinct.
Fig. 3: Radar charts of fraction of simulations of giant panda populations going extinct in 100 yr.
Fig. 4: The spatial pattern of extinction risks under different scenarios of climate change and Giant Panda National Park.
Fig. 5: Branch diagrams of populations and their extinction possibilities under current conditions and RCP 8.5 scenario, and the corresponding national park scenarios.

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

Data that support the findings of this study are available in the main text or the Supplementary Information.

Code availability

The main text describes the procedure flow of the individual-based algorithm. Code for running the model is available at https://github.com/konglingqiao/eco.

References

  1. Tang, X. et al. Scheme design and main result analysis of the fourth national survey on giant pandas. For. Resour. Manag. 1, 11–16 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Swaisgood, R. R., Wang, D. & Wei, F. Panda downlisted but not out of the woods. Conserv. Lett. 11, 1 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Xu, W. et al. Reassessing the conservation status of the giant panda using remote sensing. Nat. Ecol. Evol. 1, 1635–1638 (2017).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Shen, G. et al. Climate change challenges the current conservation strategy for the giant panda. Biol. Conserv. 190, 43–50 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Tian, Z. et al. The next widespread bamboo flowering poses a massive risk to the giant panda. Biol. Conserv. 234, 180–187 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Lu, Z. et al. Patterns of genetic diversity in remaining giant panda populations. Conserv. Biol. 15, 1596–1607 (2001).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Pimm, S. L. The Balance of Nature (Univ. Chicago Press, 1991).

  8. Pimm, S. L., Dollar, L. & Bass, O. L. Jr The genetic rescue of the Florida panther. Anim. Conserv. 9, 115–122 (2006).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Qing, J. et al. The minimum area requirements (MAR) for giant panda: an empirical study. Sci. Rep. 6, 37715 (2016).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Haddad, N. M. et al. Habitat fragmentation and its lasting impact on Earth’s ecosystems. Sci. Adv. 1, e1500052 (2015).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Fahrig, L. Relative effects of habitat loss and fragmentation on population extinction. J. Wildl. Manag. 61, 603–610 (1997).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Simberloff, D. Habitat fragmentation and population extinction of birds. IBIS 137, S105–S111 (1995).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Viña, A. et al. Range-wide analysis of wildlife habitat: implications for conservation. Biol. Conserv. 143, 1960–1969 (2010).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Wang, T., Ye, X., Skidmore, A. K. & Toxopeus, A. G. Characterising the spatial distribution of giant pandas (Ailuropoda melanoleuca) in fragmented forest landscapes. J. Biogeogr. 37, 865–878 (2010).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Xu, W. et al. Conservation of giant panda habitat in South Minshan, China, after the May 2008 earthquake. Front. Ecol. Environ. 7, 353–358 (2009).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Gong, M., Guan, T., Hou, M., Liu, G. & Zhou, T. Hopes and challenges for giant panda conservation under climate change in the Qinling Mountains of China. Ecol. Evol. 7, 596–605 (2017).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Songer, M., Delion, M., Biggs, A. & Huang, Q. Modeling impacts of climate change on giant panda habitat. Int. J. Ecol. 2012, 108752 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Tuanmu, M. N. et al. Climate-change impacts on understorey bamboo species and giant pandas in China’s Qinling Mountains. Nat. Clim. Change 3, 249–253 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. He, K. et al. Effects of roads on giant panda distribution: a mountain range scale evaluation. Sci. Rep. 9, 1110 (2019).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Li, H. et al. Application of least-cost path model to identify a giant panda dispersal corridor network after the Wenchuan earthquake—case study of Wolong Nature Reserve in China. Ecol. Model. 221, 944–952 (2010).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Qi, D. et al. Quantifying landscape linkages among giant panda subpopulations in regional scale conservation. Integr. Zool. 7, 165–174 (2012).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Shen, G. et al. Proposed conservation landscape for giant pandas in the Minshan Mountains, China. Conserv. Biol. 22, 1144–1153 (2008).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Kong, L. et al. Habitat conservation redlines for the giant pandas in China. Biol. Conserv. 210, 83–88 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Zhang, J. et al. Natural recovery and restoration in giant panda habitat after the Wenchuan earthquake. Ecol. Manag. 319, 1–9 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Boyce, M. S. Population viability analysis. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 23, 481–497 (1992).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Possingham, H. in Conservation of Australia’s Forest Fauna (ed. Lunney, D.) Ch. 3, 35–40 (Royal Zoological Society of New South Wales, 1991).

  27. Lacy, R. C. VORTEX: a computer simulation model for population viability analysis. Wildl. Res. 20, 45–65 (1993).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Wei, F., Fgeng, Z. & Hu, J. Population viability analysis computer model of giant panda population in Wuyipeng, Wolong Natural Reserve, China. Int. Conf. Bear. Res. Manag. 9, 19–23 (1997).

    Google Scholar 

  29. Guo, J., Chen, Y. & Hu, J. Population viability analysis of giant pandas in the Yele Nature Reserve. J. Nat. Conserv. 10, 35–40 (2002).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Jiang, H. & Hu, J. Population viability analysis for the Giant Panda in Baoxing County, Sichuan. Sichuan J. Zool. 29, 161–165 (2010).

    Google Scholar 

  31. Li, X., Li, D., Yong, Y. & Zhang, J. A preliminary analysis on population viability analysis for Giant Panda in Foping. Acta Zool. Sin. 43, 285–293 (1997).

    Google Scholar 

  32. Yang, Z., Hu, J. & Liu, N. The influence of dispersal on the metapopulation viability of Giant Panda (Aliuropoda melanoleuca) in the Minshan Mountains. Acta Zool. Acad. Sci. Hung. 53, 169–184 (2007).

    Google Scholar 

  33. Leslie, P. H. On the use of matrices in certain population mathematics. Biometrika 33, 183–212 (1945).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Carter, J., Ackleh, A. S., Leonard, B. P. & Wang, H. Giant panda (Ailuropoda melanoleuca) population dynamics and bamboo (subfamily Bambusoideae) life history: a structured population approach to examining carrying capacity when the prey are semelparous. Ecol. Model. 123, 207–223 (1999).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Xia, W. & Hu, J. On the trend of population dynamics in giant panda based on age structure. Acta Theriologica Sin. 9, 87–93 (1989).

    Google Scholar 

  36. Zhu, L. et al. Conservation implications of drastic reductions in the smallest and most isolated populations of giant pandas. Conserv. Biol. 24, 1299–1306 (2010).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. State Forestry Administration P. R. C. Report of the Third National Giant Panda Census (Science Publishing House, 2006).

  38. Zhu, L., Hu, Y., Zhang, Z. & Wei, F. Effect of China’s rapid development on its iconic giant panda. Chin. Sci. Bull. 58, 2134–2139 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Hu, J. Research on the Giant Panda (Shanghai Science and Technology Education Press, 2001).

  40. Li, R. et al. Climate change threatens giant panda protection in the 21st century. Biol. Conserv. 182, 93–101 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Yang, B. et al. China’s collective forest tenure reform and the future of the giant panda. Conserv. Lett. 8, 251–261 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Linderman, M. et al. The effects of understory bamboo on broad-scale estimates of giant panda habitat. Biol. Conserv. 121, 383–390 (2005).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Yang, Z. et al. Reintroduction of the giant panda into the wild: a good start suggests a bright future. Biol. Conserv. 217, 181–186 (2018).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. Kaiser, H. The dynamics of populations as result of the properties of individual animals. Fortschr. D. Zool. 25, 109–136 (1979).

    Google Scholar 

  45. Huston, M., DeAngelis, D. & Post, W. New computer models unify ecological theory. BioScience 38, 682–691 (1988).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. DeAngelis, D. L. Individual-Based Models and Approaches In Ecology: Populations, Communities and Ecosystems (CRC Press, 2017)

  47. Uchmański, J. & Grimm, V. Individual-based modelling in ecology: what makes the difference? Trends Ecol. Evol. 11, 437–441 (1996).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Wei, F. et al. A study on the life table of wild giant pandas. Acta Theriologica Sin. 9, 81–86 (1989).

    Google Scholar 

  49. Hou, W. Revision of the giant panda life table and related data indicators. Zool. Res. 21, 361–366 (2000).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Z.O. and L.K. received support from the Second Tibetan Plateau Scientific Expedition and Research Program (STEP) (grant no. 2019QZKK0308). W.X. received support from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (grant no. 31971542). Z.O. received support from Strategic Priority Research Program of the Chinese Academy of Sciences (grant no. XDA19050504). We thank the National Forestry and Grassland Administration (National Park Administration) for data support.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

L.K., Z.O., W.X. and S.L.P. designed the research. L.K., W.X., Y.X. and H.S. performed the research. L.K., W.X., Y.X. and H.S. analysed the data. L.K., Z.O., S.L.P., W.X. and Y.X. wrote the paper.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Zhiyun Ouyang.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Peer review information Nature Ecology & Evolution thanks Zhi Lu and the other, anonymous, reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work.

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Extended data

Extended Data Fig. 1 Population dynamics of giant panda under optimal conditions.

Different initial age structures (youth majority structure, adult majority structure, old majority structure and the stable age structure) are used to simulate population trends for 100 years. There is a dramatic decline for the old majority structure. Regardless of the initial age structure, the population will grow slowly and steadily when the age structure becomes stable in the long run.

Extended Data Fig. 2 Uncertainty in Survival Probabilities (SP).

(1): Uncertainty in the SP of the individuals under one year old. (2)-(27): Uncertainty in the SP of the individuals aged 1 to 26.

Extended Data Fig. 3 Uncertainty analysis of Reproductive Probabilities (RP).

(1)-(17): Uncertainty in the RP of the individuals aged 5 to 21.

Extended Data Fig. 4 Uncertainty Analysis of initial age structure.

Extinction probabilities of populations with different numbers of individuals under different initial age structures.

Extended Data Fig. 5 Extinction possibility (%) of each population.

Cells filled with colour show the extinction possibilities under different scenarios. S1: Business as usual; S2: RCP2.6; S3: RCP4.5; S4: RCP 8.5; S5: Giant Panda National Park; S6~S8: (RCP2.6, RCP4.5, RCP 8.5) & Giant Panda National Park. The darker the red, the higher the extinction possibility, and the darker the blue, the lower the extinction possibility. The second column corresponds to the current giant panda populations in Fig. 1 in the main text.

Extended Data Fig. 6 Procedure flow of extinction risk simulation of giant panda populations.

(1.1) Individual assignment; (1.2) Reproduction simulation; (1.3) Judgement of survival.

Supplementary information

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kong, L., Xu, W., Xiao, Y. et al. Spatial models of giant pandas under current and future conditions reveal extinction risks. Nat Ecol Evol 5, 1309–1316 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41559-021-01520-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41559-021-01520-1

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing Anthropocene

Sign up for the Nature Briefing: Anthropocene newsletter — what matters in anthropocene research, free to your inbox weekly.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing: Anthropocene