Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Retreat of large carnivores across the giant panda distribution range

Abstract

As both a flagship and umbrella species, the giant panda (Ailuropoda melanoleuca) is one of the most heavily invested species in conservation. Here, we report the wide distribution range retreat of the leopard (Panthera pardus, 81% loss), snow leopard (P. uncia, 38%), wolf (Canis lupus, 77%) and dhole (Cuon alpinus, 95%) from protected areas in the giant panda distribution range since the 1960s. The present findings indicate the insufficiency of giant panda conservation for protecting these large carnivore species and suggest that future conservation efforts should target restoring ecosystems with high trophic complexity to facilitate the recovery of large carnivore populations.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.

$32.00

All prices are NET prices.

Fig. 1: Status of the four large carnivore species across the PAs in the giant panda distribution range, China.
Fig. 2: Numbers of PAs where the four large carnivore species still exist and where they have disappeared across the five mountain ranges in the giant panda distribution range, China.

Data availability

Detailed information on the survey effort and the occurrence of large carnivore species in the 73 studied PAs is available in Supplementary Data 1, which represents all the data needed to reproduce the analysis.

References

  1. Li, B. V. & Pimm, S. L. China’s endemic vertebrates sheltering under the protective umbrella of the giant panda. Conserv. Biol. 30, 329–339 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Swaisgood, R., Wang, D. & Wei, F. Panda downlisted but not out of the woods. Conserv. Lett. 11, e12355 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Díaz, S. et al. Summary for Policymakers of the Global Assessment Report on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services of the Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services (IPBES, 2019); https://www.ipbes.net/sites/default/files/downloads/spm_unedited_advance_for_posting_htn.pdf

  4. Li, J. et al. Role of Tibetan Buddhist monasteries in snow leopard conservation. Conserv. Biol. 28, 87–94 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Gong, H., Zeng, Z., Wang, X., Zhao, K. & Zhang, Q. Current status and analysis of national protected animal species in Shaanxi Province of China. J. Shaanxi Norm. Univ. 37, 58–65 (2009).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Schaller, G. B. The Last Panda (Univ. of Chicago Press, 1994).

  7. Johnson, K. G., Wang, W., Reid, D. G. & Hu, J. Food habits of Asiatic leopards (Panthera pardus fusea) in Wolong Reserve, Sichuan, China. J. Mammal. 74, 646–650 (1993).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Laguardia, A. et al. The current distribution and status of leopards Panthera pardus in China. Oryx 51, 153–159 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Mainka, S. A., Xianmeng, Q., Tingmei, H. & Appel, M. J. Serologic survey of giant pandas (Ailuropoda melanoleuca), and domestic dogs and cats in the Wolong Reserve, China. J. Wildl. Dis. 30, 86–89 (1994).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Connor, T., Hull, V. & Liu, J. Telemetry research on elusive wildlife: a synthesis of studies on giant pandas. Integr. Zool. 11, 295–307 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Johansson, O. et al. Sex-specific seasonal variation in puma and snow leopard home range utilization. Ecosphere 9, e02371 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Xu, W. et al. Reassessing the conservation status of the giant panda using remote sensing. Nat. Ecol. Evol. 1, 1635–1638 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Wolf, C. & Ripple, W. J. Range contractions of the world’s large carnivores. R. Soc. Open Sci. 4, 170052 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Lambeck, R. J. Focal species: a multi-species umbrella for nature conservation. Conserv. Biol. 11, 849–856 (1997).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Roberge, J. & Angelstam, P. Usefulness of the umbrella species concept as a conservation tool. Conserv. Biol. 18, 76–85 (2004).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Dirzo, R. et al. Defaunation in the Anthropocene. Science 345, 401–406 (2014).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Ceballos, G., Ehrlich, P. R. & Dirzo, R. Biological annihilation via the ongoing sixth mass extinction signaled by vertebrate population losses and declines. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 114, E6089–E6096 (2017).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Xu, W. et al. Transforming protected area management in China. Trends Ecol. Evol. 34, 762–766 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Estes, J. A. et al. Trophic downgrading of planet Earth. Science 333, 301–306 (2011).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Chapron, G. et al. Recovery of large carnivores in Europe’s modern human-dominated landscapes. Science 346, 1517–1519 (2014).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Gompper, M. E., Belant, J. L. & Kays, R. Carnivore coexistence: America’s recovery. Science 347, 382–383 (2015).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Athreya, V., Odden, M., Linnell, J. D., Krishnaswamy, J. & Karanth, U. Big cats in our backyards: persistence of large carnivores in a human dominated landscape in India. PLoS ONE 8, e57872 (2013).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Perino, A. et al. Rewilding complex ecosystems. Science 364, eaav5570 (2019).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. The Giant Pandas of China: Status Quo—Major Findings of the Fourth National Survey on Giant Panda (State Forestry Administration of P. R. China, 2015); http://www.forestry.gov.cn/main/69/content-743562.html

  25. Wang, D., Li, S., McShea, W. J. & Li, M. Use of remote-trip cameras for wildlife surveys and evaluating the effectiveness of conservation activities at a nature reserve in Sichuan Province, China. Environ. Manage. 38, 942–951 (2006).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Li, S., Wang, D., Gu, X. & McShea, W. J. Beyond pandas, the need for a standardized monitoring protocol for large mammals in Chinese nature reserves. Biodivers. Conserv. 19, 3195–3206 (2010).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Karanth, K. U., Nichols, J. D., Kumar, N. S., Link, W. A. & Hines, J. E. Tigers and their prey: predicting carnivore densities from prey abundance. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 101, 4854–4858 (2004).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Steenweg, R. et al. Scaling-up camera traps: monitoring the planet’s biodiversity with networks of remote sensors. Front. Ecol. Environ. 15, 26–34 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Carbone, C. et al. The use of photographic rates to estimate densities of tigers and other cryptic mammals. Anim. Conserv. 4, 75–79 (2001).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Kays, R. An empirical evaluation of camera trap study design: how many, how long, and when? Methods Ecol. Evol. https://doi.org/10.1111/2041‐210X.13370 (2020).

  31. Li, S. et al. Gauging the impact of management expertise on the distribution of large mammals across protected areas. Divers. Distrib. 18, 1166–1176 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Shi, B. & Zhao, E. (eds) Sichuan Fauna Economica Vol. 1 (Sichuan People’s Publishing House, 1982).

  33. Zheng, S. & Song, S. (eds) Mammals in Qingling Mountain Area (China Forestry Publishing House, 2010).

Download references

Acknowledgements

This study was supported by the Strategic Priority Research Program of the Chinese Academy of Sciences (grant no. XDA19050503). The Smithsonian National Zoological Park was one of the sponsors of the camera trap surveys organized by the authors. We thank the reserve staff who returned the questionnaires and provided camera trap data. We also thank L. He, Y. Li, S. Zhu and Y. Huang for helping with the questionnaire survey and S. H. M. Butchart, K. Ma and H. Bu for their insightful comments and suggestions.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

S.L. and X.S. designed and conducted the research and performed the analysis. X.S., S.L. and W.J.M. drafted the paper. S.L., D.W., W.J.M. and X.S. conducted the camera trap surveys in 18 PAs and provided the corresponding data. S.L., X.G. and X.Z. conducted the questionnaire survey. L.Z. contributed to the study conceptualization and revised the manuscript.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Li Zhang or Xiaoli Shen.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Extended data

Extended Data Fig. 1 The studied protected areas in the giant panda range, China.

Marked numbers referring to the protected area ID in Extended Data Table 1. Boundaries were not available for the three managed forests (Kuanba, Huangyang and Huangtuliang) and two community-managed protected areas (Xinyigou and Guanba).

Extended Data Fig. 2

Map of the proposed Giant Panda National Park and the existing giant panda nature reserves.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Information

Supplementary Data 3–5.

Reporting Summary

Supplementary Tables

Supplementary Data 1: basic information and camera trap survey efforts of the studied PAs in the giant panda range. Supplementary Data 2: number of detections and detection rates (number of detections per 1,000 camera-days) of the four large carnivore species in the giant panda range and other study sites in China with known viable populations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Li, S., McShea, W.J., Wang, D. et al. Retreat of large carnivores across the giant panda distribution range. Nat Ecol Evol 4, 1327–1331 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41559-020-1260-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41559-020-1260-0

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing