The cat has long been important to human societies as a pest-control agent, object of symbolic value and companion animal, but little is known about its domestication process and early anthropogenic dispersal. Here we show, using ancient DNA analysis of geographically and temporally widespread archaeological cat remains, that both the Near Eastern and Egyptian populations of Felis silvestris lybica contributed to the gene pool of the domestic cat at different historical times. While the cat’s worldwide conquest began during the Neolithic period in the Near East, its dispersal gained momentum during the Classical period, when the Egyptian cat successfully spread throughout the Old World. The expansion patterns and ranges suggest dispersal along human maritime and terrestrial routes of trade and connectivity. A coat-colour variant was found at high frequency only after the Middle Ages, suggesting that directed breeding of cats occurred later than with most other domesticated animals.

Access optionsAccess options

Rent or Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.


All prices are NET prices.


  1. 1.

    Classical Cats: The Rise and Fall of the Sacred Cat (Routledge, 2001).

  2. 2.

    , , & More evidence for cat taming at the Predynastic elite cemetery of Hierakonpolis (Upper Egypt). J. Arch. Sci. 45, 103–111 (2014).

  3. 3.

    , , , & Early taming of the cat in Cyprus. Science 304, 259 (2004).

  4. 4.

    , , & Felis silvestris. IUCN (2015).

  5. 5.

    et al. The Near Eastern origin of cat domestication. Science 317, 519–523 (2007).

  6. 6.

    , & From wild animals to domestic pets, an evolutionary view of domestication. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 106, 9971–9978 (2009).

  7. 7.

    Animal Domestication and Behavior (CABI Publishing, 2002).

  8. 8.

    in Mammal Species of the World 3rd edn (eds Wilson, D. E. & Reeder, D. M. ) (Johns Hopkins Univ. Press, 2005).

  9. 9.

    in Biodiversity in Agriculture (eds Gepts, P. et al. ) 227–259 (Cambridge Univ. Press, 2012).

  10. 10.

    , , , & European wildcat populations are subdivided into five main biogeographic groups: consequences of Pleistocene climate changes or recent anthropogenic fragmentation? Ecol. Evol. 6, 3–22 (2015).

  11. 11.

    et al. Comparative analysis of the domestic cat genome reveals genetic signatures underlying feline biology and domestication. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 111, 17230–17235 (2014).

  12. 12.

    et al. The genomic signature of dog domestication reveals adaptation to a starch-rich diet. Nature 495, 360–364 (2013).

  13. 13.

    et al. Specifying and sustaining pigmentation patterns in domestic and wild cats. Science 337, 1536–1541 (2012).

  14. 14.

    et al. A cost-effective high-throughput metabarcoding approach powerful enough to genotype ~44 000 year-old rodent remains from Northern Africa. Mol. Ecol. Resour. (2016).

  15. 15.

    , , & The taming of the cat. Genetic and archaeological findings hint that wildcats became housecats earlier—and in a different place—than previously thought. Sci. Am. 300, 68–75 (2009).

  16. 16.

    et al. Genetic distinction of wildcat (Felis silvestris) populations in Europe, and hybridization with domestic cats in Hungary. Mol. Ecol. 12, 2585–2598 (2003).

  17. 17.

    The Cat in Ancient Egypt, revised edn 144 (British Museum Press, 1993–2006).

  18. 18.

    , & The wild cat (Felis silvestris Schr.) and the feral domestic cat: problems of the morphology, taxonomy, identification of the hybrids and purity of the wild population. Hist. Nat. Bulg. 8, 101–120 (1997).

  19. 19.

    & Modelling the dynamic biogeography of the wildcat: implications for taxonomy and conservation. J. Zool. 279, 144–155 (2009).

  20. 20.

    . et al. Magura Cave, Bulgaria: a multidisciplinary study of Late Pleistocene human palaeoenvironment in the Balkans. Quat. Int. 415, 86–108 (2016).

  21. 21.

    et al. Molecular evidence of Pleistocene bidirectional faunal exchange between Europe and the Near East: the case of the bicoloured shrew (Crocidura leucodon, Soricidae). J. Evol. Biol. 20, 1799–1808 (2007).

  22. 22.

    & An archaeological and historical review of the relationships between felids and people. Anthrozoos 22, 221–238 (2009).

  23. 23.

    Römische Tierhaltung und Tierzucht. Eine Synthese aus archäozoologischer Untersuchung und schriftlich-bildlicher Überlieferung 444 (Verlag Marie Leidorf, 1998).

  24. 24.

    & Untersuchungen an Skelettresten von Katzen aus Haithabu (Ausgrabung 1966 – 1969) 86 (Wachholtz, 1987).

  25. 25.

    Fur in dress 168 (Batsford, 1981).

  26. 26.

    , , , & Genetic tracking of mice and other bioproxies to infer human history. Trends Genet. 29, 298–308 (2013).

  27. 27.

    Berenike and the Ancient Maritime Spice Route (Univ. California Press, 2011).

  28. 28.

    Rome in the East: The Transformation of an Empire 523 (Routledge, 2000).

  29. 29.

    , , & East Africa and Madagascar in the Indian Ocean world. J. World Prehist. 26, 213–281 (2013).

  30. 30.

    & The genetic integrity of the ex situ population of the European wildcat (Felis silvestris silvestris) is seriously threatened by introgression from domestic cats (Felis silvestris catus). PLoS ONE 9, e106083 (2014).

  31. 31.

    et al. Establishing the validity of domestication genes using DNA from ancient chickens. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 111, 6184–6189 (2014).

  32. 32.

    et al. Coat color variation at the beginning of horse domestication. Science 324, 485 (2009).

  33. 33.

    et al. Ecological consequences of human niche construction: examining long-term anthropogenic shaping of global species distributions. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 113, 6388–6396 (2016).

  34. 34.

    , & Minimizing DNA-contamination by using UNG-coupled quantitative real-time PCR (UQPCR) on degraded DNA samples: application to ancient DNA studies. Biotechniques 38, 569–575 (2005).

  35. 35.

    et al. An efficient multistrategy DNA decontamination procedure of PCR reagents for hypersensitive PCR applications. PLoS ONE 5, e13042 (2010).

  36. 36.

    et al. Library construction for ancient genomics: single strand or double strand? Biotechniques 56, 289–300 (2014).

Download references


This research has been funded by the IAP program (BELSPO), the KU Leuven BOF Centre of Excellence Financing on CAS, and the CNRS (T.G. and E.-M.G.). The high-containment laboratory of the Institut Jacques Monod, Paris was supported by a grant to E.-M.G. from the University Paris Diderot, ARS 2016-2018. The sequencing facility of the Institut Jacques Monod, Paris, and J.D., were supported by grants to T.G. from the University Paris Diderot, the ‘Fondation pour la Recherche Médicale’ (DGE20111123014), and the ‘Région Ile-de-France’ (grant 11015901). C.O. was supported by the FWO mobility program (V4.519.11N, K2.197.14N, K2.057.14N). Faunal research carried out by J.P. and team in Anatolia received funding by the German Research Foundation (DFG PE424/10-1,2). Research by N.Bo. M.E.P., and A.C. was supported by an ERC grant (206148) and UK NERC Radiocarbon Facility grant (NF/2012/2/4). The archaeological and archaeozoological research conducted by A.Bă. and A. Bo. was supported by the Romanian National Authority for Scientific Research, UEFISCDI (PN-II-ID-PCE-2011-3-1015 and PN-II-RU-TE-2014-4-0519). Research at Songo Mnara was directed by S. Wynne-Jones and J. Fleisher with support from the National Science Foundation (BCS1123091) and the Arts and Humanities Research Council (AH/J502716/1). We thank G. Larson and E. A. Bennett for critical reading of the manuscript; the Ufficio Beni Archeologici della Provincia Autonoma di Bolzano for granting access to the archaeological material of Galgenbühel/Dos de la Forca and J. Crezzini for help in sampling; M.-A. Félix, Institut Jacques Monod and École Normale Supérieure, Paris, for granting access to the pyrosequencer; M. Larmuseau and A. Van Geystelen for discussions and assistance with nuclear SNP analyses; K. Knaepen, M. Coomans, and A. Giucca for support in laboratory procedures in Leuven; and J. Nackaerts of the veterinary hospital Kruisbos (Wezemaal, Belgium) for providing cat blood samples. We also thank the curators of the following collections for facilitating access to the material under their care and the permission to take tissue samples: the Royal Museum for Central Africa (Tervuren, Belgium), the Muséum National d’Histoire Naturelle and Musée du Louvre (Paris, France), the British Museum and Natural History Museum (London, UK) and the Bavarian State Collection of Anthropology and Palaeoanatomy (Munich, Germany).

Author information

Author notes

    • Claudio Ottoni
    •  & Laura Llorente

    Present addresses: Centre for Ecological and Evolutionary Synthesis (CEES), Department of Biosciences, University of Oslo, NO-0316 Oslo, Norway (C.O.); BioArch, Department of Archaeology, University of York, York YO10 5NG, UK (L.L).

    • Thierry Grange
    •  & Eva-Maria Geigl

    These authors contributed equally to this work.


  1. KU Leuven—University of Leuven, Department of Imaging and Pathology, Center for Archaeological Sciences; University Hospitals Leuven, Laboratory of Forensic Genetics and Molecular Archaeology, B-3000 Leuven, Belgium.

    • Claudio Ottoni
    •  & Ronny Decorte
  2. Institut Jacques Monod, UMR 7592, CNRS and University Paris Diderot, F-75013 Paris, France.

    • Claudio Ottoni
    • , Julien Daligault
    • , Silvia Guimaraes
    • , Thierry Grange
    •  & Eva-Maria Geigl
  3. Royal Belgian Institute of Natural Sciences, B-1000 Brussels, Belgium.

    • Wim Van Neer
    •  & Bea De Cupere
  4. KU Leuven—University of Leuven, Department of Biology, Laboratory of Biodiversity and Evolutionary Genomics, Center of Archaeological Sciences, B-3000 Leuven, Belgium.

    • Wim Van Neer
  5. Institute of Palaeoanatomy, Domestication Research and the History of Veterinary Medicine, Ludwig-Maximilian University, D-80539 Munich, Germany.

    • Joris Peters
  6. Bavarian Natural History Collections, Bavarian State Collection of Anthropology and Palaeoanatomy, D-80333 Munich, Germany.

    • Joris Peters
  7. National Museum of Natural History at the Bulgarian Academy of Sciences, BG-1000 Sofia, Bulgaria.

    • Nikolai Spassov
  8. Radcliffe Institute for Advanced Study, Harvard University, Cambridge, 02138 Massachusetts, USA.

    • Mary E. Prendergast
  9. Max Planck Institute for the Science of Human History, Jena D-07743, Germany.

    • Nicole Boivin
  10. Laboratorio de Arquezoología, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, E-28049 Madrid, Spain.

    • Arturo Morales-Muñiz
    •  & Laura Llorente
  11. National History Museum of Romania, RO-030026 Bucharest, Romania.

    • Adrian Bălăşescu
  12. Institute of Prehistoric Archaeology, Free University Berlin, D-14195 Berlin, Germany.

    • Cornelia Becker
  13. German Archaeological Institute, D-14195 Berlin, Germany.

    • Norbert Benecke
  14. ‘Vasile Pârvan’ Institute of Archaeology of the Romanian Academy, RO-010667 Bucharest, Romania.

    • Adina Boroneant
  15. Groningen Institute of Archaeology, University of Groningen, NL-9712 ER Groningen, the Netherlands.

    • Hijlke Buitenhuis
    •  & Jwana Chahoud
  16. Archéorient; CNRS/UMR 5133, Université Lumière Lyon II, F-69007 Lyon, France.

    • Jwana Chahoud
  17. Natural History Museum, Lebanese University, LB-1107-2020 Beirut, Lebanon.

    • Jwana Chahoud
  18. School of Social Science, The University of Queensland, AU-4072 Brisbane, Queensland 4072, Australia.

    • Alison Crowther
  19. Institute of Zoology, National Academy of Sciences of Armenia, AM-0019 Yerevan, Armenia.

    • Nina Manaseryan
  20. Labex Resmed, Université Paris IV la Sorbonne, F-75005 Paris, France.

    • Hervé Monchot
  21. Istanbul University, Osteoarchaeology Practice and Research Center, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, TR-34320 Avcilar-Istanbul, Turkey.

    • Vedat Onar
  22. Institute of Archaeology and Ethnology, Polish Academy of Sciences, PL-61-712 Poznań, Poland.

    • Marta Osypińska
  23. Archéologie Alsace, F-67600 Sélestat, and UMR 7041, ArScan, Nanterre, France.

    • Olivier Putelat
  24. Department of Anthropology, Rice University, Houston, Texas 77005, USA.

    • Eréndira M. Quintana Morales
  25. Natural History Museum of Geneva, CH-1208 Genève, Switzerland.

    • Jacqueline Studer
  26. Soprintendenza Archeologia della Toscana, I-50121 Firenze, Italy.

    • Ursula Wierer


  1. Search for Claudio Ottoni in:

  2. Search for Wim Van Neer in:

  3. Search for Bea De Cupere in:

  4. Search for Julien Daligault in:

  5. Search for Silvia Guimaraes in:

  6. Search for Joris Peters in:

  7. Search for Nikolai Spassov in:

  8. Search for Mary E. Prendergast in:

  9. Search for Nicole Boivin in:

  10. Search for Arturo Morales-Muñiz in:

  11. Search for Adrian Bălăşescu in:

  12. Search for Cornelia Becker in:

  13. Search for Norbert Benecke in:

  14. Search for Adina Boroneant in:

  15. Search for Hijlke Buitenhuis in:

  16. Search for Jwana Chahoud in:

  17. Search for Alison Crowther in:

  18. Search for Laura Llorente in:

  19. Search for Nina Manaseryan in:

  20. Search for Hervé Monchot in:

  21. Search for Vedat Onar in:

  22. Search for Marta Osypińska in:

  23. Search for Olivier Putelat in:

  24. Search for Eréndira M. Quintana Morales in:

  25. Search for Jacqueline Studer in:

  26. Search for Ursula Wierer in:

  27. Search for Ronny Decorte in:

  28. Search for Thierry Grange in:

  29. Search for Eva-Maria Geigl in:


The project was initiated by W.V.N., E.-M.G., C.O., T.G. and R.D. The ancient DNA study was conceived and designed by T.G., E.-M.G. and C.O. C.O. carried out the molecular laboratory work, with support of S.G. and analysed the data. J.D. generated the aMPlex Torrent data. The archaeological bone samples were provided by W.V.N., B.D.C., J.P., N.S., M.E.P., N.Bo., A.M.-M., A.Bă., C.B., N.Be., A.Bo., H.B., J.C., A.C., L.L., N.M., H.M., V.O., M.O., M.O., O.P., E.M.Q.M., J.S., U.W., and W.V.N. and B.D.C. were responsible for their curation and archaeozoological recording. The authors’ list from A.Ba. to U.W. is in alphabetical order. C.O., E.M.G. and T.G. wrote the paper. W.V.N., B.D.C., J.P., N.S., M.E.P., N.Bo., A.M.-M. contributed to further discussion about the interpretation of the data and the outline of the paper. N.Bo. and M.E.P. revised the English. All the authors gave final approval for publication.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Claudio Ottoni or Thierry Grange or Eva-Maria Geigl.

Supplementary information

PDF files

  1. 1.

    Supplementary Information

    Supplementary Methods; Supplementary References; Supplementary Figures 1–5; Supplementary Tables 1–5

Excel files

  1. 1.

    Supplementary Data 1,2

    Data 1: List of all the ancient and modern samples analysed in this study. Data 2: List of samples successfully analysed in this study and detailed information about the samples, the dating, the genotyping procedures followed, the mtDNA haplotypes and the polymorphic states of the three nuclear markers investigated.

Zip files

  1. 1.

    Supplementary Code

    Cat aMPlex Torrent bioinformatic tools. A bash script and accessory fasta and gff files for data analysis of the aMPlex Torrent data.

About this article

Publication history






Further reading

Newsletter Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing