Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Analysis
  • Published:

Exposure to international trade lowers green voting and worsens environmental attitudes

Abstract

From a political perspective, advancing green agendas in democracies requires obtaining electoral support for parties and candidates proposing green platforms. It is therefore crucial to understand the factors driving green voting and attitudes. Yet, limited research has explored the role of economic determinants in this context. In this study we show that globalization, through the distributional consequences of import competition, is an important determinant of support for parties proposing green platforms. Our analysis covers the United States and 15 countries of Western Europe, over the period 2000–2019, with trade exposure measured at the level of subnational geographic areas. We find that higher trade exposure leads to lower support for more environmentalist parties and to more sceptical attitudes about climate change. Our empirical findings are in line with the theoretical channel of deprioritization of environmental concerns, as trade-induced economic distress raises the salience of economic issues.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Fig. 1: Effects of trade exposure from different origins.
Fig. 2: Effects of trade exposure on attitudes.

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

The data analysed in this study are available in the Harvard Dataverse repository at the following link: https://doi.org/10.7910/DVN/T4ZAHS ref. 25. All data are publicly available with one exception: individual data from the Gallup Poll Social Series. The Gallup-based replication database is shared upon request with researchers who have access to Gallup data.

Code availability

The data analysis was carried out in Stata and R. The codes that generate and visualize the results reported in this study are available in the Harvard Dataverse repository at the following link: https://doi.org/10.7910/DVN/T4ZAHS ref. 25.

References

  1. Drews, S. & Van den Bergh, J. C. What explains public support for climate policies? A review of empirical and experimental studies. Clim. Policy 16, 855–876 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Hazlett, C. & Mildenberger, M. Wildfire exposure increases pro-environment voting within Democratic but not Republican areas. Am. Polit. Sci. Rev. 114, 1359–1365 (2020).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Hoffmann, R., Muttarak, R., Peisker, J. & Stanig, P. Climate change experiences raise environmental concerns and promote green voting. Nat. Clim. Change 12, 148–155 (2022).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Kahn, M. E. & Kotchen, M. J. Business cycle effects on concern about climate change: the chilling effect of recession. Clim. Change Econ. 2, 257–273 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Autor, D. H., Dorn, D. & Hanson, G. H. The China syndrome: local labor market effects of import competition in the united states. Am. Econ. Rev. 103, 2121–2168 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Inglehart, R. The silent revolution in Europe: intergenerational change in post-industrial societies. Am. Polit. Sci. Rev. 65, 991–1017 (1971).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Weber, E. U. Experience-based and description-based perceptions of long-term risk: why global warming does not scare us (yet). Clim. Change 77, 103–120 (2006).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Kahn, M. E. & Matsusaka, J. G. Demand for environmental goods: evidence from voting patterns on California initiatives. J. Law Econ. 40, 137–174 (1997).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Berthe, A. & Elie, L. Mechanisms explaining the impact of economic inequality on environmental deterioration. Ecol. Econ. 116, 191–200 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Vona, F. Job losses and political acceptability of climate policies: why the ‘job-killing’ argument is so persistent and how to overturn it. Clim. Policy 19, 524–532 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Colantone, I. & Stanig, P. The trade origins of economic nationalism: import competition and voting behavior in Western europe. Am. J. Polit. Sci. 62, 936–953 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Autor, D., Dorn, D., Hanson, G. & Majlesi, K. et al. Importing political polarization? The electoral consequences of rising trade exposure. Am. Econ. Rev. 110, 3139–3183 (2020).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Ballard-Rosa, C., Malik, M. A., Rickard, S. J. & Scheve, K. The economic origins of authoritarian values: evidence from local trade shocks in the United Kingdom. Comp. Polit. Stud. 54, 2321–2353 (2021).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Gemenis, K., Katsanidou, A. & Vasilopoulou, S. The politics of anti-environmentalism: positional issue framing by the European radical right. In MPSA Annual Conference, 12–15 (2012, Chicago, USA).

  15. Colantone, I., Di Lonardo, L., Margalit, Y. & Percoco, M. The political consequences of green policies: evidence from Italy. Am. Polit. Sci. Rev. 1–19 (2022); https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055423000308

  16. McCright, A. M. & Dunlap, R. E. The politicization of climate change and polarization in the American public’s views of global warming, 2001–2010. Sociol. Q. 52, 155–194 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Imai, K., Keele, L., Tingley, D. & Yamamoto, T. Unpacking the black box of causality: learning about causal mechanisms from experimental and observational studies. Am. Polit. Sci. Rev. 105, 765–789 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Anelli, M., Colantone, I. & Stanig, P. Individual vulnerability to industrial robot adoption increases support for the radical right. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 118, e2111611118 (2021).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Hummels, D., Jørgensen, R., Munch, J. & Xiang, C. The wage effects of offshoring: evidence from Danish matched worker–firm data. Am. Econ. Rev. 104, 1597–1629 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Bernard, A. B., Jensen, J. B. & Schott, P. K. Survival of the best fit: exposure to low-wage countries and the (uneven) growth of US manufacturing plants. J. Int. Econ. 68, 219–237 (2006).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Autor, D. H., Dorn, D. & Hanson, G. H. The China shock: learning from labor-market adjustment to large changes in trade. Annu. Rev. Econ. 8, 205–240 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Kollman, K., Hicken, A., Caramani, D., Backer, D. & Lublin, D. Constituency-level elections archive [data file and codebook] (Center for Political Studies, Univ. Michigan, 2016).

  23. Bafumi, J. & Herron, M. C. Leapfrog representation and extremism: a study of American voters and their members in congress. Am. Polit. Sci. Rev. 104, 519–542 (2010).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Volkens, A. et al. The Manifesto Data Collection. Manifesto Project (MRG/CMP/MARPOR), version 2018a (WZB, 2018); https://doi.org/10.25522/manifesto.mpds.2018a

  25. Bez, C., Bosetti, V., Colantone, I. & Zanardi, M. Replication data for: exposure to international trade lowers green voting and worsens environmental attitudes (2023); https://doi.org/10.7910/DVN/T4ZAHS

Download references

Acknowledgements

We are grateful to M. C. Attolini, Y. Filippone, P.-L. Mengel, G. Palladino, A. Pisa and Y. Stuka for excellent research assistance. We thank H.-G. Betz, J. Frieden, P. Hall, P. Stanig, D. Tingley, F. Vona, and seminar participants at Paris School of Economics, Scuola Superiore Sant’Anna, University of Liverpool and at the ETSG Conference 2021 in Ghent, for helpful comments and suggestions.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

The initial research idea stems from I.C. and M.Z. C.B. was mainly responsible for preparing the election data for Europe, and the attitudes data for the United States and for Europe. M.Z. prepared the election data for the United States. I.C. and M.Z. prepared the trade exposure indicators. C.B., I.C. and M.Z. wrote the code and carried out the regression analysis. C.B. produced the figures. C.B., I.C. and M.Z. produced the tables. V.B. gave conceptual guidance and supported the theoretical framing and interpretation of the findings. I.C. wrote the original draft, and C.B., V.B. and M.Z. reviewed and edited the manuscript.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Charlotte Bez or Valentina Bosetti.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Peer review

Peer review information

Nature Climate Change thanks the anonymous reviewers for their contribution to the peer review of this work.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Information

Supplementary Tables 1–42 and Fig. 1.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Bez, C., Bosetti, V., Colantone, I. et al. Exposure to international trade lowers green voting and worsens environmental attitudes. Nat. Clim. Chang. 13, 1131–1135 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-023-01789-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-023-01789-z

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing