Letter | Published:

Methane production as key to the greenhouse gas budget of thawing permafrost

Nature Climate Changevolume 8pages309312 (2018) | Download Citation


Permafrost thaw liberates frozen organic carbon, which is decomposed into carbon dioxide (CO2) and methane (CH4). The release of these greenhouse gases (GHGs) forms a positive feedback to atmospheric CO2 and CH4 concentrations and accelerates climate change1,2. Current studies report a minor importance of CH4 production in water-saturated (anoxic) permafrost soils3,4,5,6 and a stronger permafrost carbon–climate feedback from drained (oxic) soils1,7. Here we show through seven-year laboratory incubations that equal amounts of CO2 and CH4 are formed in thawing permafrost under anoxic conditions after stable CH4-producing microbial communities have established. Less permafrost carbon was mineralized under anoxic conditions but more CO2–carbon equivalents (CO2–Ce) were formed than under oxic conditions when the higher global warming potential (GWP) of CH4 is taken into account8. A model of organic carbon decomposition, calibrated with the observed decomposition data, predicts a higher loss of permafrost carbon under oxic conditions (113 ± 58 g CO2–C kgC−1 (kgC, kilograms of carbon)) by 2100, but a twice as high production of CO2–Ce (241 ± 138 g CO2–Ce kgC−1) under anoxic conditions. These findings challenge the view of a stronger permafrost carbon-climate feedback from drained soils1,7 and emphasize the importance of CH4 production in thawing permafrost on climate-relevant timescales.

Access optionsAccess options

Rent or Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.


All prices are NET prices.

Additional information

Publisher’s note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.


  1. 1.

    Schuur, E. A. G. et al. Climate change and the permafrost carbon feedback. Nature 520, 171–179 (2015).

  2. 2.

    McGuire, A. D., Chapin, F. S. III, Walsh, J. E. & Wirth, C. Integrated regional changes in arctic climate feedbacks: implications for the global climate system. Annu. Rev. Environ. Resour. 31, 61–91 (2006).

  3. 3.

    Lee, H., Schuur, E. A. G., Inglett, K. S., Lavoie, M. & Chanton, J. P. The rate of permafrost carbon release under aerobic and anaerobic conditions and its potential effects on climate. Glob. Change Biol. 18, 515–527 (2012).

  4. 4.

    Treat, C. C. et al. Temperature and peat type control CO2 and CH4 production in Alaskan permafrost peats. Glob. Change Biol. 20, 2674–2686 (2014).

  5. 5.

    Waldrop, M. P. et al. Molecular investigations into a globally important carbon pool: permafrost-protected carbon in Alaskan soils. Glob. Change Biol. 16, 2543–2554 (2010).

  6. 6.

    Roy Chowdhury, T. et al. Stoichiometry and temperature sensitivity of methanogenesis and CO2 production from saturated polygonal tundra in Barrow, Alaska. Glob. Change Biol. 21, 722–737 (2015).

  7. 7.

    Schädel, C. et al. Potential carbon emissions dominated by carbon dioxide from thawed permafrost soils. Nat. Clim. Change 6, 950–953 (2016).

  8. 8.

    Myhre, et al. in Climate Change 2013: The Physical Science Basis (eds Stocker, T. F. et al.) 659–740 (Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, UK, 2013).

  9. 9.

    Hugelius, G. et al. Estimated stocks of circumpolar permafrost carbon with quantified uncertainty ranges and identified data gaps. Biogeosciences 11, 6573–6593 (2014).

  10. 10.

    Jorgenson, M. T. et al. Reorganization of vegetation, hydrology and soil carbon after permafrost degradation across heterogeneous boreal landscapes. Environ. Res. Lett. 8, 035017 (2013).

  11. 11.

    Bring, A. et al. Arctic terrestrial hydrology: a synthesis of processes, regional effects, and research challenges. J. Geophys. Res. Biogeosci. 121, 621–649 (2016).

  12. 12.

    Treat, C. C. et al. A pan-Arctic synthesis of CH4 and CO2 production from anoxic soil incubations. Glob. Change Biol. 21, 2787–2803 (2015).

  13. 13.

    Natali, S. M. et al. Permafrost thaw and soil moisture driving CO2 and CH4 release from upland tundra. J. Geophys. Res. Biogeosci. 120, 525–537 (2015).

  14. 14.

    Johnston, C. E. et al. Effect of permafrost thaw on CO2 and CH4 exchange in a western Alaska peatland chronosequence. Environ. Res. Lett. 9, 085004 (2014).

  15. 15.

    Knoblauch, C., Beer, C., Sosnin, A., Wagner, D. & Pfeiffer, E.-M. Predicting long-term carbon mineralization and trace gas production from thawing permafrost of Northeast Siberia. Glob. Change Biol. 19, 1160–1172 (2013).

  16. 16.

    Liebner, S. et al. Shifts in methanogenic community composition and methane fluxes along the degradation of discontinuous permafrost. Front. Microbiol. 6, 356 (2015).

  17. 17.

    Angel, R., Claus, P. & Conrad, R. Methanogenic archaea are globally ubiquitous in aerated soils and become active under wet anoxic conditions. ISME J. 6, 847–862 (2012).

  18. 18.

    Ping, C. L., Jastrow, J. D., Jorgenson, M. T., Michaelson, G. J. & Shur, Y. L. Permafrost soils and carbon cycling. SOIL 1, 147–171 (2015).

  19. 19.

    Voigt, C. et al. Warming of subarctic tundra increases emissions of all three important greenhouse gases—carbon dioxide, methane, and nitrous oxide. Glob. Change Biol. 23, 3121–3138 (2017).

  20. 20.

    Symons, G. E. & Buswell, A. M. The methane fermentation of carbohydrates. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 55, 2028–2036 (1933).

  21. 21.

    Nilsson, M. & Öquist, M. in Carbon Cycling in Northern Peatlands (eds Baird, A. J., Belyea, L. R., Comas, X., Reeve, A. S. & Slater, L. D.) 131–144 (Geophysical Monograph Series Vol. 184, American Geophysical Union, Washington, DC, USA 2009).

  22. 22.

    Hodgkins, S. B. et al. Changes in peat chemistry associated with permafrost thaw increase greenhouse gas production. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 111, 5819–5824 (2014).

  23. 23.

    Knoblauch, C., Spott, O., Evgrafova, S., Kutzbach, L. & Pfeiffer, E.-M. Regulation of methane production, oxidation and emission by vascular plants and bryophytes in ponds of the northeast Siberian polygonal tundra. J. Geophys. Res. Biogeosci. 120, 2525–2541 (2015).

  24. 24.

    Cooper, M. D. A. et al. Limited contribution of permafrost carbon to methane release from thawing peatlands. Nat. Clim. Change 7, 507–511 (2017).

  25. 25.

    Schädel, C. et al. Circumpolar assessment of permafrost C quality and its vulnerability over time using long-term incubation data. Glob. Change Biol. 20, 641–652 (2014).

  26. 26.

    Elberling, B. et al. Long-term CO2 production following permafrost thaw. Nat. Clim. Change 3, 890–894 (2013).

  27. 27.

    Walter Anthony, K. et al. Methane emissions proportional to permafrost carbon thawed in Arctic lakes since the 1950s. Nat. Geosci. 9, 679–682 (2016).

  28. 28.

    Popp, T. J., Chanton, J. P., Whiting, G. J. & Grant, N. Evaluation of methane oxidation in the rhizosphere of a Carex dominated fen in north central Alberta, Canada. Biogeochemistry 51, 259–281 (2000).

  29. 29.

    Friborg, T., Soegaard, H., Christensen, T. R., Lloyd, C. R. & Panikov, N. S. Siberian wetlands: where a sink is a source. Geophys. Res. Lett. 30, 2129–2132 (2003).

  30. 30.

    Wille, C., Kutzbach, L., Sachs, T., Wagner, D. & Pfeiffer, E.-M. Methane emission from Siberian arctic polygonal tundra: eddy covariance measurements and modeling. Glob. Change Biol. 14, 1395–1408 (2008).

  31. 31.

    Boike, J. et al. Baseline characteristics of climate, permafrost and land cover from a new permafrost observatory in the Lena River Delta, Siberia (1998–2011). Biogeosciences 10, 2105–2128 (2013).

  32. 32.

    Kutzbach, L., Wagner, D. & Pfeiffer, E.-M. Effect of microrelief and vegetation on methane emission from wet polygonal tundra, Lena Delta, Northern Siberia. Biogeochemistry 69, 341–362 (2004).

  33. 33.

    Morgenstern, A. et al. Evolution of thermokarst in East Siberian ice-rich permafrost: a case study. Geomorphology 201, 363–379 (2013).

  34. 34.

    Yamamoto, S., Alcauskas, J. B. & Crozier, T. E. Solubility of methane in distilled water and seawater. J. Chem. Eng. Data 21, 78–80 (1976).

  35. 35.

    Millero, F., Huang, F., Graham, T. & Pierrot, D. The dissociation of carbonic acid in NaCl solutions as a function of concentration and temperature. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 71, 46–55 (2007).

  36. 36.

    Amundson, R. & Baisden, W. T. in Methods in Ecosystem Science (eds Sala, O. E., Jackson, R. B., Mooney, H. A. & Howarth, R. B.) 117–137 (Springer, New York, USA, 2000).

  37. 37.

    Andrén, O. & Kätterer, T. ICBM: the introductory carbon balance model for exploration of soil carbon balances. Ecol. Appl. 7, 1226–1236 (1997).

  38. 38.

    Meentemeyer, V. Macroclimate and lignin control of litter decomposition rates. Ecology 59, 465–472 (1978).

  39. 39.

    Steinberg, L. M. & Regan, J. M. mcrA-targeted real-time quantitative PCR method to examine methanogen communities. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 75, 4435–4442 (2009).

Download references


We acknowledge the financial support through the Cluster of Excellence 'CliSAP' (EXC177), Universität Hamburg, funded through the German Research Foundation, the CarboPerm project funded by the German Ministry for Research and Education (03G0836A) to C.K., C.B. and E.-M.P. and the Helmholtz Gemeinschaft by funding the Helmholtz Young Investigators Group of S.L. (VH-NG-919). We also thank G. Hugelius for valuable discussions, D. Wagner and S. Zubrzycki for providing samples, B. Schwinge for laboratory assistance, W. Schneider and G. Stoof for help during the field campaigns and the German and Russian colleagues from the Alfred Wegener Institute in Potsdam, the Lena Delta Reserve in Tiksi and the Tiksi Hydrobase for logistical support.

Author information


  1. Institute of Soil Science, Universität Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany

    • Christian Knoblauch
    •  & Eva-Maria Pfeiffer
  2. Center for Earth System Research and Sustainability, Universität Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany

    • Christian Knoblauch
    •  & Eva-Maria Pfeiffer
  3. Department of Environmental Science and Analytical Chemistry, Stockholm University, Stockholm, Sweden

    • Christian Beer
  4. Bolin Centre for Climate Research, Stockholm University, Stockholm, Sweden

    • Christian Beer
  5. GFZ German Research Centre for Geosciences, Section Geomicrobiology, Potsdam, Germany

    • Susanne Liebner
  6. Institute for Biochemistry and Biology, University of Potsdam, Potsdam, Germany

    • Susanne Liebner
  7. Russian Academy of Sciences, Siberian Branch, Mel’nikov Permafrost Institute, Yakutsk, Russia

    • Mikhail N. Grigoriev


  1. Search for Christian Knoblauch in:

  2. Search for Christian Beer in:

  3. Search for Susanne Liebner in:

  4. Search for Mikhail N. Grigoriev in:

  5. Search for Eva-Maria Pfeiffer in:


C.K. and C.B. designed the study. C.K., E.-M.P and M.N.G. did the field work. C.K. conducted the incubation experiment, C.B. calibrated the model and predicted site-level and pan-Arctic GHG production and S.L. quantified the methanogen abundance. C.K. and C.B wrote the manuscript with contributions from all the co-authors.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Christian Knoblauch.

Supplementary information

  1. Supplementary Information

    Supplementary Results, Supplementary Figures 1–2, Supplementary Tables 1–6 and Supplementary References

About this article

Publication history