Pharmaceutical companies continue to advocate for the use of in vitro models towards the reduction of animal use in drug discovery and development while acknowledging that further advancements are needed to heighten the models’ current state of readiness.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Access options
Access Nature and 54 other Nature Portfolio journals
Get Nature+, our best-value online-access subscription
$29.99 / 30 days
cancel any time
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 12 digital issues and online access to articles
$99.00 per year
only $8.25 per issue
Buy this article
- Purchase on Springer Link
- Instant access to full article PDF
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
References
Avila, A. M. et al. Regul. Toxicol. Pharmacol. 139, 105345 (2023).
ICH Guideline M3(R2) on Non-clinical Safety Studies for the Conduct of Human Clinical Trials and Marketing Authorisation for Pharmaceuticals: Step 5 (European Medicines Agency, 2013).
Strategic Plan to Promote the Development and Implementation of Alternative Test Methods Within the TSCA Program (US Environmental Protection Agency, 2018).
A Strategic Roadmap for Establishing New Approaches to Evaluate the Safety of Chemicals and Medical Products in the United States (ICCVAM, 2018).
Avila, A. M. et al. Regul. Toxicol. Pharmacol. 114, 104662 (2020).
OECD Test Guidelines for Chemicals (OECD, accessed 24 October 2023); https://go.nature.com/3T4GMeV
ICH Guideline M7(R2) on Assessment and Control of DNA Reactive (Mutagenic) Impurities in Pharmaceuticals to Limit Potential Carcinogenic Risk: Step 5 (European Medicines Agency, 2023).
Butler, L. D. et al. Regul. Toxicol. Pharmacol. 87 (Suppl. 3), S1–S15 (2017).
Valentin, J. P. & Leishman, D. Regul. Toxicol. Pharmacol. 139, 105368 (2023).
Schmeisser, S. et al. Environ. Int. 178, 108082 (2023).
Parish, S. T. et al. Regul. Toxicol. Pharmacol. 112, 104592 (2020).
Fabre, K. et al. Lab Chip 20, 1049–1057 (2020).
Vogt, N. Nat. Methods 18, 27 (2021).
Ingber, D. E. Nat. Rev. Genet. 23, 467–491 (2022).
Low, L. A., Mummery, C., Berridge, B. R., Austin, C. P. & Tagle, D. A. Nat. Rev. Drug Discov. 20, 345–361 (2021).
Rumsey, J. W. et al. Adv. Ther. 5, 2200030 (2022).
Clapp, N., Amour, A., Rowan, W. C. & Candarlioglu, P. L. Biochem. Soc. Trans. 49, 1881–1890 (2021).
Baran, S. W. et al. ALTEX 39, 297–314 (2022).
Kopec, A. K. et al. J. Toxicol. Sci. 46, 99–114 (2021).
Cairns, J. et al. Front. Pharmacol. https://doi.org/10.3389/fphar.2023.1142581 (2023).
Marx, U. et al. ALTEX 37, 365–394 (2020).
Vulto, P. & Joore, J. Nat. Rev. Drug Discov. 20, 961–962 (2021).
Ewart, L. et al. Commun. Med. 2, 154 (2022).
Proctor, W. R. et al. Arch. Toxicol. 91, 2849–2863 (2017).
Schaller, T. H. et al. J. Immunother. Cancer 8, e000213 (2020).
Ji, Y. et al. Clin. Transl. Sci. 15, 2218–2229 (2022).
Dudal, S. et al. J. Immunother. 39, 279–289 (2016).
Muller, P. Y., Milton, M., Lloyd, P., Sims, J. & Brennan, F. R. Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. 20, 722–729 (2009).
Van Vleet, T. R., Liguori, M. J., Lynch, J. J. III, Rao, M. & Warder, S. SLAS Discov. 24, 1–24 (2019).
Obach, R. S. Curr. Top. Med. Chem. 11, 334–339 (2011).
Wang, J. & Urban, L. Drug Discov. World 73–86 (2004).
OTP INTERACT Meeting (FDA, 14 June 2023); https://go.nature.com/47S08bq
PDUFA Reauthorization Performance Goals and Procedures Fiscal Years 2023 Through 2027 (FDA, 2022); https://go.nature.com/413kiwP
Innovative Science and Technology Approaches for New Drugs (ISTAND) Pilot Program (FDA, 6 April 2023); https://go.nature.com/418CsNq
Horner, S. et al. Regul. Toxicol. Pharmacol. 65, 334–343 (2013).
Phillips, J. A. et al. Lab Chip 20, 468–476 (2020).
Novak, R. et al. Nat. Biomed. Eng. 4, 407–420 (2020).
Oleaga, C. et al. Sci. Rep. 6, 20030 (2016).
Edington, C. D. et al. Sci. Rep. 8, 4530 (2018).
Ronaldson-Bouchard, K. et al. Nat. Biomed. Eng. 6, 351–371 (2022).
Homan, K. A. Adv. Biol. 7, e2200334 (2023).
Ainslie, G. R. et al. Lab Chip 19, 3152–3161 (2019).
Baudy, A. R. et al. Lab Chip 20, 215–225 (2020).
Fowler, S. et al. Lab Chip 20, 446–467 (2020).
Hardwick, R. N. et al. Lab Chip 20, 199–214 (2020).
Irrechukwu, O. et al. ALTEX 40, 485–518 (2023).
Peters, M. F. et al. Lab Chip 20, 1177–1190 (2020).
Peterson, N. C., Mahalingaiah, P. K., Fullerton, A. & Di Piazza, M. Lab Chip 20, 697–708 (2020).
Pointon, A. et al. Lab Chip 21, 458–472 (2021).
Ramsden, D. et al. ALTEX 39, 273–296 (2022).
Wang, X. et al. ALTEX 40, 314–336 (2022).
Bloomingdale, P. et al. Curr. Opin. Toxicol. 4, 79–87 (2017).
Rusyn, I. et al. Toxicol. Sci. 188, 143–152 (2022).
Graham, J. C. et al. Cutan. Ocul. Toxicol. 37, 380–390 (2018).
Linsenmeier, R. A. & Saterbak, A. Ann. Biomed. Eng 48, 1590–1615 (2020).
Ewart, L. et al. Exp. Biol. Med. 242, 1579–1585 (2017).
Gaskin, S. P., Griffin, A., Hauser, J. R., Katz, G. M. & Klein, R. L. in Wiley International Encyclopedia of Marketing (eds Sheth, J. N. & Malhotra, N. K.) 1–6 (John Wiley & Sons, 2010); https://doi.org/10.1002/9781444316568.wiem05020
Tomlinson, L. et al. Adv. Biol. https://doi.org/10.1002/adbi.202300131 (2023).
Ewart, L. & Roth, A. Nat. Rev. Drug Discov. 20, 327–328 (2021).
Hartung, T. et al. ALTEX 36, 3–17 (2019).
Salian-Mehta, S. et al. Toxicol. Res. Appl. https://doi.org/10.1177/2397847321999760 (2021).
Medina, L. V., Coenen, J. & Kastello, M. D. J. Am. Assoc. Lab Anim. Sci. 54, 115–118 (2015).
Mangipudy, R., Burkhardt, J. & Kadambi, V. J. Regul. Toxicol. Pharmacol. 70, 439–441 (2014).
Monticello, T. M. et al. Toxicol. Appl. Pharmacol. 334, 100–109 (2017).
Graham, J. C. et al. Regul. Toxicol. Pharmacol. 126, 105023 (2021).
Mitra, M. S. et al. Regul. Toxicol. Pharmacol. 122, 104895 (2021).
Lombardo, F. et al. J. Med. Chem. 60, 9097–9113 (2017).
Einholf, H. J. et al. Enabling the Virtual Human Through Physiologically-based Pharmacokinetic Modeling Pharmaceutical Technology Regulatory Sourcebook eBook 24–27 (pharmtech.com, 2021).
Riedmaier, A. E. et al. AAPS J. 22, 123 (2020).
Jones, H. M. et al. Clin. Pharmacokinet. 50, 331–347 (2011).
Price, E. et al. J. Med. Chem. 64, 9389–9403 (2021).
Acknowledgements
This Comment was developed with the support of the International Consortium for Innovation and Quality in Pharmaceutical Development (IQ, www.iqconsortium.org). IQ is a not-for-profit organization of pharmaceutical and biotechnology companies with a mission of advancing science and technology to augment the capability of member companies to develop transformational solutions that benefit patients, regulators and the broader research and development community. Within IQ, we recognize J. Brady, R. Abrahamson, R. Evers (Janssen) and T. Chan (Boehringer-Ingelheim) for their careful review of this manuscript.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
All authors contributed to the writing of the manuscript. K.A.H., D.M.S. and A.K.K. organized the manuscript, and facilitated inclusive discussions among all authors.
Corresponding authors
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
All authors are employed by pharmaceutical companies, as per their affiliations. R.V holds equity in Emulate Inc.
Peer review
Peer review information
Nature Biomedical Engineering thanks Adrian Roth, Danilo Tagle and Y. Shrike Zhang for their contribution to the peer review of this work.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Stresser, D.M., Kopec, A.K., Hewitt, P. et al. Towards in vitro models for reducing or replacing the use of animals in drug testing. Nat. Biomed. Eng (2023). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41551-023-01154-7
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41551-023-01154-7
This article is cited by
-
Microfluidic high-throughput 3D cell culture
Nature Reviews Bioengineering (2024)