Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Article
  • Published:

A temperature-responsive intravenous needle that irreversibly softens on insertion

Abstract

The high stiffness of intravenous needles can cause tissue injury and increase the risk of transmission of blood-borne pathogens through accidental needlesticks. Here we describe the development and performance of an intravenous needle whose stiffness and shape depend on body temperature. The needle is sufficiently stiff for insertion into soft tissue yet becomes irreversibly flexible after insertion, adapting to the shape of the blood vessel and reducing the risk of needlestick injury on removal, as we show in vein phantoms and ex vivo porcine tissue. In mice, the needles had similar fluid-delivery performance and caused substantially less inflammation than commercial devices for intravenous access of similar size. We also show that an intravenous needle integrated with a thin-film temperature sensor can monitor core body temperature in mice and detect fluid leakage in porcine tissue ex vivo. Temperature-responsive intravenous needles may improve patient care.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Fig. 1: Design and operating principles of a P-CARE needle.
Fig. 2: Thermal and mechanical characterization of the gallium-based P-CARE needle.
Fig. 3: In vivo evaluations of biocompatibility of P-CARE needles in mice.
Fig. 4: In vivo fluid-delivery effectiveness of the P-CARE needle versus the commercial IV catheter.
Fig. 5: Potential utility of the P-CARE needle integrated with a temperature sensor.

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

The main data supporting the results in this study are available within the paper and its Supplementary Information. The raw and analysed datasets generated during the study are available for research purposes from the corresponding authors on reasonable request. Source data for the figures are provided with this paper.

References

  1. Boras, B. et al. Preclinical characterization of an intravenous coronavirus 3CL protease inhibitor for the potential treatment of COVID19. Nat. Commun. 12, 6055 (2021).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Ma, F. et al. Neurotransmitter-derived lipidoids (NT-lipidoids) for enhanced brain delivery through intravenous injection. Sci. Adv. 6, eabb4429 (2020).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. FDA approves first treatment for COVID-19. US Food and Drug Administration https://www.fda.gov/news-events/press-announcements/fda-approves-first-treatment-covid-19 (2020).

  4. Wei, F., Chen, W. & Lin, X. A clinical rule for the difficulty prediction on scalp intravenous access in infants (SIAI) from emergency room. Sci. Rep. 10, 6624 (2020).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Finfer, S., Myburgh, J. & Bellomo, R. Intravenous fluid therapy in critically ill adults. Nat. Rev. Nephrol. 14, 541–557 (2018).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Samson, A. et al. Intravenous delivery of oncolytic reovirus to brain tumor patients immunologically primes for subsequent checkpoint blockade. Sci. Transl. Med. 10, eaam7577 (2018).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Zingg, W. & Pittet, D. Peripheral venous catheters: an under-evaluated problem. Int. J. Antimicrob. Agents 34, S38–S42 (2009).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Rickard, C. M., McCann, D., Munnings, J. & McGrail, M. R. Routine resite of peripheral intravenous devices every 3 days did not reduce complications compared with clinically indicated resite: a randomised controlled trial. BMC Med. 8, 53 (2010).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Jin, J. et al. The optimal choice of medication administration route regarding intravenous, intramuscular, and subcutaneous injection. Patient Prefer. Adherence 9, 923–942 (2015).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Malach, T. et al. Prospective surveillance of phlebitis associated with peripheral intravenous catheters. Am. J. Infect. Control 34, 308–312 (2006).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Duffy, B. L. & Lee, J. S. Intravenous access: a comparison of two methods. Anaesth. Intensive Care 11, 135–137 (1983).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Weiss, D., Yaakobovitch, H., Tal, S., Nyska, A. & Rotman, O. M. Novel short peripheral catheter design for prevention of thrombophlebitis. J. Thromb. Haemost. 17, 39–51 (2019).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Abolfotouh, M. A., Salam, M., Bani-Mustafa, A., White, D. & Balkhy, H. H. Prospective study of incidence and predictors of peripheral intravenous catheter-induced complications. Ther. Clin. Risk Manag. 10, 993–1001 (2014).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Miliani, K. et al. Peripheral venous catheter-related adverse events: evaluation from a multicentre epidemiological study in France (the CATHEVAL Project). PLoS ONE 12, e0168637 (2017).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Kim, J. T., Park, J. Y., Lee, H. J. & Cheon, Y. J. Guidelines for the management of extravasation. J. Educ. Eval. Health Prof. 17, 21 (2020).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Al-Benna, S., O’Boyle, C. & Holley, J. Extravasation injuries in adults. ISRN Dermatol. 2013, 856541 (2013).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Webster, J., Osborne, S., Rickard, C. M. & Marsh, N. Clinically‐indicated replacement versus routine replacement of peripheral venous catheters. Cochrane Database Syst. Rev. 2019, CD007798 (2019).

    PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Alexandrou, E. et al. International prevalence of the use of peripheral intravenous catheters. J. Hosp. Med. 10, 530–533 (2015).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Wallis, M. C. et al. Risk factors for peripheral intravenous catheter failure: a multivariate analysis of data from a randomized controlled trial. Infect. Control Hosp. Epidemiol. 35, 63–68 (2014).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Weber, P. W. et al. Modifying peripheral IV catheters with side holes and side slits results in favorable changes in fluid dynamic properties during the injection of iodinated contrast material. AJR Am. J. Roentgenol. 193, 970–977 (2009).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Xu, Y. et al. Hydrogel-coated needles prevent puncture site bleeding in arteriovenous fistula and arteriovenous grafts in rats. Biomed. Pharmacother. 143, 112113 (2021).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Yu, H. et al. Water-insoluble polymeric guanidine derivative and application in the preparation of antibacterial coating of catheter. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 10, 39257–39267 (2018).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Travessa, D., Ferrante, M. & den Ouden, G. Diffusion bonding of aluminium oxide to stainless steel using stress relief interlayers. Mater. Sci. Eng. A 337, 287–296 (2002).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Phua, S. L. et al. Reinforcement of polyether polyurethane with dopamine-modified clay: the role of interfacial hydrogen bonding. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 4, 4571–4578 (2012).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Ebnesajjad, S. in Fluoroplastics 2nd edn, Vol. 2 (ed Ebnesajjad, S.) 216–235 https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-1-4557-3197-8.00009-2 (William Andrew Publishing, 2015).

  26. Li, C., Guan, G., Reif, R., Huang, Z. & Wang, R. K. Determining elastic properties of skin by measuring surface waves from an impulse mechanical stimulus using phase-sensitive optical coherence tomography. J. R. Soc. Interface 9, 831–841 (2012).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Alfulayw, K. H., Al-Otaibi, S. T. & Alqahtani, H. A. Factors associated with needlestick injuries among healthcare workers: implications for prevention. BMC Health Serv. Res. 21, 1074 (2021).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. Beltrami, E. M., Williams, I. T., Shapiro, C. N. & Chamberland, M. E. Risk and management of blood-borne infections in health care workers. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 13, 385–407 (2000).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Khan Afridi, A. A., Kumar, A. & Sayani, R. Needle stick injuries—risk and preventive factors: a study among health care workers in tertiary care hospitals in Pakistan. Glob. J. Health Sci. 5, 85–92 (2013).

    PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. Schuurmans, J., Lutgens, S. P., Groen, L. & Schneeberger, P. M. Do safety engineered devices reduce needlestick injuries? J. Hosp. Infect. 100, 99–104 (2018).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. WHO Guideline on the Use of Safety-Engineered Syringes for Intramuscular, Intradermal and Subcutaneous Injections in Health Care Settings (World Health Organization, 2016).

  32. Harb, A. C. et al. Safety engineered injection devices for intramuscular, subcutaneous and intradermal injections in healthcare delivery settings: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Nurs. 14, 71 (2015).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  33. Byun, S.-H., Sim, J. Y., Agno, K.-C. & Jeong, J.-W. Materials and manufacturing strategies for mechanically transformative electronics. Mater. Today Adv. 7, 100089 (2020).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Byun, S.-H. et al. Mechanically transformative electronics, sensors, and implantable devices. Sci. Adv. 5, eaay0418 (2019).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  35. Lin, Y., Genzer, J. & Dickey, M. D. Attributes, fabrication, and applications of gallium-based liquid metal particles. Adv. Sci. 7, 2000192 (2020).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Elbourne, A. et al. Antibacterial liquid metals: biofilm treatment via magnetic activation. ACS Nano 14, 802–817 (2020).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Lu, Y. et al. Transformable liquid-metal nanomedicine. Nat. Commun. 6, 10066 (2015).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Chen, M. et al. Self-powered multifunctional sensing based on super-elastic fibers by soluble-core thermal drawing. Nat. Commun. 12, 1416 (2021).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  39. Yan, W. et al. Thermally drawn advanced functional fibers: new frontier of flexible electronics. Mater. Today 35, 168–194 (2020).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Qu, Y. et al. Superelastic multimaterial electronic and photonic fibers and devices via thermal drawing. Adv. Mater. 30, 1707251 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Wen, X. et al. Flexible, multifunctional neural probe with liquid metal enabled, ultra-large tunable stiffness for deep-brain chemical sensing and agent delivery. Biosens. Bioelectron. 131, 37–45 (2019).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  42. Ebrahimi, A. P. Mechanical properties of normal and diseased cerebrovascular system. J. Vasc. Interv. Neurol. 2, 155–162 (2009).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  43. Bai, M.-Y., Chang, Y.-C. & Chu, J. P. Preclinical studies of non-stick thin film metallic glass-coated syringe needles. Sci. Rep. 10, 20313 (2020).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  44. Hauzenberger, J. R. et al. Systematic in vivo evaluation of the time-dependent inflammatory response to steel and Teflon insulin infusion catheters. Sci. Rep. 8, 1132 (2018).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  45. Jeong, J.-W. et al. Wireless optofluidic systems for programmable in vivo pharmacology and optogenetics. Cell 162, 662–674 (2015).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  46. I. Mechanical properties of catheters. Acta Radiol. Diagn. 4, 11–22 https://doi.org/10.1080/05678066609170493 (1966).

  47. Makvandi, P. et al. Engineering microneedle patches for improved penetration: analysis, skin models and factors affecting needle insertion. Nanomicro. Lett. 13, 93 (2021).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  48. Kataoka, H. et al. Measurement of the tip and friction force acting on a needle during penetration. In Proc. 5th Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention (MICCAI 2002) (eds Dohi, T. & Kikinis, R.) 216–223 (Springer, 2002).

  49. Elastosil RT 623 A/B datasheet version 1.3 (Wacker Chemie, 2014).

  50. Sylgard 184 silicone elastomer datasheet reference number 10-1204A-01 (Dow Corning, 1998).

  51. Summerfield, A., Meurens, F. & Ricklin, M. E. The immunology of the porcine skin and its value as a model for human skin. Mol. Immunol. 66, 14–21 (2015).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Chitnis, G. D. et al. A resistance-sensing mechanical injector for the precise delivery of liquids to target tissue. Nat. Biomed. Eng. 3, 621–631 (2019).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  53. Yu, Y. et al. Biocompatibility and in vivo operation of implantable mesoporous PVDF-based nanogenerators. Nano Energy 27, 275–281 (2016).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  54. KoreaVaccine catalogue (KoreaVaccine, 2016).

  55. Nathwani, R. A., Pais, S., Reynolds, T. B. & Kaplowitz, N. Serum alanine aminotransferase in skeletal muscle diseases. Hepatology 41, 380–382 (2005).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. Mazzaccara, C. et al. Age-related reference intervals of the main biochemical and hematological parameters in C57BL/6J, 129SV/EV and C3H/HeJ mouse strains. PLoS ONE 3, e3772 (2008).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  57. Harrison, S. D. Jr, Burdeshaw, J. A., Crosby, R. G., Cusic, A. M. & Denine, E. P. Hematology and clinical chemistry reference values for C57BL/6 X DBA/2 F1 mice. Cancer Res. 38, 2636–2639 (1978).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  58. Haney, E. M. et al. in Screening for Lipid Disorders in Children and Adolescents (Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (US), 2007).

  59. Guo, H. et al. Advanced materials in wireless, implantable electrical stimulators that offer rapid rates of bioresorption for peripheral axon regeneration. Adv. Funct. Mater. 31, 2102724 (2021).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  60. Kim, B. J. & Meng, E. Micromachining of parylene C for bioMEMS. Polym. Adv. Technol. 27, 564–576 (2016).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  61. Gordon, C. J. The mouse thermoregulatory system: its impact on translating biomedical data to humans. Physiol. Behav. 179, 55–66 (2017).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  62. Choi, W.-M. et al. Experimental applications of in situ liver perfusion machinery for the study of liver disease. Mol. Cells 42, 45–55 (2019).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  63. Li, X. F. et al. Size–temperature phase diagram of gallium. EPL 94, 16001 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  64. Fink, E. L., Kochanek, P. M., Clark, R. S. B. & Bell, M. J. Fever control and application of hypothermia using intravenous cold saline. Pediatr. Crit. Care Med. 13, 80–84 (2012).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  65. Obořilová, A., Mayer, J., Pospı́šil, Z. & Kořı́stek, Z. Symptomatic intravenous antipyretic therapy: efficacy of metamizol, diclofenac, and propacetamol. J. Pain Symptom Manage. 24, 608–615 (2002).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  66. Schell-Chaple, H. M., Liu, K. D., Matthay, M. A., Sessler, D. I. & Puntillo, K. A. Effects of IV acetaminophen on core body temperature and hemodynamic responses in febrile critically ill adults: a randomized controlled trial. Crit. Care Med. 45, 1199–1207 (2017).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  67. Richmond, V. L., Davey, S., Griggs, K. & Havenith, G. Prediction of core body temperature from multiple variables. Ann. Occup. Hyg. 59, 1168–1178 (2015).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  68. Sessler, D. I., Warner, D. S. & Warner, M. A. Temperature monitoring and perioperative thermoregulation. Anesthesiology 109, 318–338 (2008).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  69. Moons, C. P., Hermans, K., Remie, R., Duchateau, L. & Odberg, F. Intraperitoneal versus subcutaneous telemetry devices in young Mongolian gerbils (Meriones unguiculatus). Lab. Anim. 41, 262–269 (2007).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  70. Lim, R., Damalerio, R. B., Bong, C. L., Tan, S. K. & Cheng, M.-Y. Novel conformal skin patch with embedded thin-film electrodes for early detection of extravasation. Sensors 21, 3429 (2021).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  71. Bicen, A. O., West, L. L., Cesar, L. & Inan, O. T. Toward non-invasive and automatic intravenous infiltration detection: evaluation of bioimpedance and skin strain in a pig model. IEEE J. Transl. Eng. Health Med. 6, 4100207 (2018).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  72. Shekalim, A. Method and device for detecting extravasation. US patent 6,425,878 B1 (2002).

  73. Ross, P. A., Lerman, J. & Coté, C. J. in A Practice of Anesthesia for Infants and Children 6th edn (eds Coté, C. J. et al.) 1175–1203.e8 https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-323-42974-0.00052-5 (Elsevier, 2019).

  74. ANSI/ASHRAE/ASHE Addendum A to ANSI/ASHRAE/ASHE Standard 170-2017 Ventilation of Healthcare Facilities (ASHRAE, 2020).

  75. ISO 10993-1:2018 Biological Evaluation of Medical Devices—Part 1: Evaluation and Testing within a Risk Management Process (International Organization for Standardization, 2018).

  76. Samant, P. P. & Prausnitz, M. R. Mechanisms of sampling interstitial fluid from skin using a microneedle patch. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 115, 4583–4588 (2018).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  77. Liu, Y. et al. Morphing electronics enable neuromodulation in growing tissue. Nat. Biotechnol. 38, 1031–1036 (2020).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  78. Sunwoo, S. H. et al. Chronic and acute stress monitoring by electrophysiological signals from adrenal gland. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 116, 1146–1151 (2019).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  79. Reeder, J. et al. Mechanically adaptive organic transistors for implantable electronics. Adv. Mater. 26, 4967–4973 (2014).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  80. Gupta, S. & Madoff, D. C. Image-guided percutaneous needle biopsy in cancer diagnosis and staging. Tech. Vasc. Interv. Radiol. 10, 88–101 (2007).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  81. Marticorena, R. M. & Donnelly, S. M. Impact of needles in vascular access for hemodialysis. J. Vasc. Access 17, S32–S37 (2016).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  82. Series safety data sheet SDS no. 823A (Smooth-On, 2023); https://www.smooth-on.com/msds/files/BD_DS_Eco_Equ_EZB_EZS_Psy_MS_OOMOO_Reb_ST_SS_Soma_Sol_Sorta.pdf

  83. Stingl, J. et al. Morphology and some biomechanical properties of human liver and spleen. Surg. Radiol. Anat. 24, 285–289 (2002).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  84. Karimi, A., Shojaei, A. & Tehrani, P. Measurement of the mechanical properties of the human gallbladder. J. Med. Eng. Technol. 41, 541–545 (2017).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  85. Mattei, G. & Ahluwalia, A. Sample, testing and analysis variables affecting liver mechanical properties: a review. Acta Biomater. 45, 60–71 (2016).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  86. Karimi, A. & Shojaei, A. Measurement of the mechanical properties of the human kidney. IRBM 38, 292–297 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  87. Dahms, Piechota, Dahiya, Lue & Tanagho Composition and biomechanical properties of the bladder acellular matrix graft: comparative analysis in rat, pig and human. Br. J. Urol. 82, 411–419 (1998).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  88. Egorov, V. I., Schastlivtsev, I. V., Prut, E. V., Baranov, A. O. & Turusov, R. A. Mechanical properties of the human gastrointestinal tract. J. Biomech. 35, 1417–1425 (2002).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  89. Byun, S.-H. et al. Design strategy for transformative electronic system toward rapid, bidirectional stiffness tuning using graphene and flexible thermoelectric device interfaces. Adv. Mater. 33, 2007239 (2021).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  90. Li, C., Huang, Z. & Wang, R. K. Elastic properties of soft tissue-mimicking phantoms assessed by combined use of laser ultrasonics and low coherence interferometry. Opt. Express 19, 10153–10163 (2011).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  91. Kobayashi, Y. et al. Use of puncture force measurement to investigate the conditions of blood vessel needle insertion. Med. Eng. Phys. 35, 684–689 (2013).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  92. Kalidasan, V. et al. Wirelessly operated bioelectronic sutures for the monitoring of deep surgical wounds. Nat. Biomed. Eng. 5, 1217–1227 (2021).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  93. Nagle, R., Schreiber, K. & Said, T. An evaluation of the effect of a kinked cannula on intravenous cannula flow rates. Bahrain Med. Bull. 37, 175–177 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) funded by the Ministry of Science and ICT (NRF-2021R1A2C4001483 and NRF-2020M3C1B8A01111568 to J.-W.J.; NRF-2021R1A2C3004589 to W.-I.J.).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

K.-C.A. and J.-W.J. conceptualized the project and designed the experiments for overall technology development. K.-C.A., S.-H.B., S.O., S.L., H.K. and S.C. fabricated and prepared the devices, discussed conceptual illustration, and captured the photographs for proof-of-concept demonstration and set-up. K.Y., K.K. and W.-I.J. designed and performed the experiments, collected data and analysed results in the in vivo biocompatibility and fluid-delivery tests. K.-C.A. and K.Y. performed the in vivo temperature sensing under the supervision of W.-I.J. and J.-W.J. K.-C.A., K.Y., W.-I.J. and J.-W.J. performed the investigation, analysed the data and wrote the results. K.-C.A. and J.-W.J. were responsible for conceptual drawings and data representation. K.-C.A., K.Y., W.-I.J. and J.-W.J. wrote the article. W.-I.J. and J.-W.J. acquired funding and supervised the project. W.-I.J. and J.-W.J. are co-senior authors. All authors discussed the results and contributed to revision of the article.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Won-Il Jeong or Jae-Woong Jeong.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Peer review

Peer review information

Nature Biomedical Engineering thanks Giuseppe Barillaro, Eoin O’Cearbhaill and the other, anonymous, reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Extended data

Extended Data Fig. 1 Stiffness- and shape-integrity of P-CARE needle under warm temperature.

a, Image of the temperature-controlled experimental set-up in cross section view. b, Plot of time before the needle becomes soft at various temperatures. The plot legends are as follows: blue, the needle is inside the polystyrene box with icepacks; grey, the needle is taken out from the polystyrene box without icepacks; red, the needle is taken out from the polystyrene box with icepacks. The inset shows the magnified plots for the softening time at indicated outside temperatures. Data are presented as mean values ± SD (n = 3 samples). c, Images showing the physical condition of the needle inside the polystyrene box with icepacks, externally heated to 50 °C, (left) needle inside the polystyrene box before heating, (middle) needle inside the polystyrene after 10 hrs of heating on a hotplate (50 °C) in a closed chamber, (right) needle taken out from the insulated box with icepack after 10 hrs of heating at 50 °C. Scale bar, 1 cm. d, Images of the integrated pig skin-transparent multi-layer tissue phantom with artificial vein setup, (left) side view image of the skin-multi-layer transparent tissue phantom, (left, inset) actual image of porcine skin showing small superficial veins in an upside-down view, ~1.5 mm thickness, (right) schematic illustration of integrated pig skin-transparent multi-layer tissue phantom created by using PDMS-oil (10:1 by weight), 13 mm total thickness. Scale bar, 1 cm. e, Images of the rigid insertion of the needle into porcine skin followed by fluid delivery into a customized vein-transparent tissue phantom with an external temperature of 35 °C, highlighting that a rigid insertion through pig skin using P-CARE needle is possible. Scale bars, 5 mm.

Source data

Extended Data Fig. 2 P-CARE needle after insertion and fluid delivery.

a, Image after retracting the softened P-CARE needle from tissue phantom, demonstrating a gravity-bent and completely softened needle after use for an advance safe-handling needle disposal. b, Plot of thermal response during the freezing process of the softened P-CARE needle after usage (that is, rigid insertion). The solidification of the softened needle occurs when the needle was exposed to temperature of −5 °C. At this temperature, it takes about 29.45 s for the gallium needle to solidify (tc), verifying that the softened needle after use (that is, withdrawn from the soft tissue after rigid insertion) will indefinitely exhibit a low modulus of elasticity when use at a healthcare facility (20–24 °C), making the needle completely non-reusable after first usage.

Source data

Extended Data Fig. 3 Characterization of nanomembrane temperature sensor integrated in P-CARE needle.

a, Relative resistance change as a function of temperature, showing that the phase state of P-CARE needle (rigid or soft) has no significant effect on the sensing performance (Tambient= 20 °C) within physiological temperature range (30 to 42 °C). Note that the same sample was measured repeatedly (n = 3 trials). b, Relative resistance change as a function of time, exhibiting that the encapsulated P-CARE needle sensor has a comparable thermal response time (~9 s) with the one of an encapsulation-free thin-film sensor of the same design when immersed in the same medium (Tmedium= 37 °C, Tambient= 25 °C). The slight difference between sensor output is attributed to the polymeric encapsulation of the device. c, Relative resistance change as a function of time of P-CARE needle immersed in a medium of varying temperature (30, 37 and 50 °C). d, Relative resistance change as a function of increasing or decreasing medium temperature, demonstrating no significant device hysteresis within physiological temperature range. Note that the same sample was measured repeatedly (n = 3 trials). e, Plot of sensor output as a function of radius of curvature, indicating electrical stability during bending. f, Relative resistance change as a function of insertion depth into a medium with constant temperature. The result exhibits that the sensor output is independent of insertion depth as needle advances deeper (75% of total needle length is immersed, which is similar to the conventional practice in IV needle placement in a healthcare setting) into a temperature-controlled environment (Tmedium = 36 °C; Tambient = 24 °C; θ = ~ 30°). Error bars show the mean ± standard deviation (n = 3 samples).

Source data

Supplementary information

Supplementary Information

Supplementary figures, tables and references.

Reporting Summary

Source data

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Agno, KC., Yang, K., Byun, SH. et al. A temperature-responsive intravenous needle that irreversibly softens on insertion. Nat. Biomed. Eng (2023). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41551-023-01116-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41551-023-01116-z

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing