Abstract
The tight correlations between the masses of supermassive black holes (BHs) and the properties of their host galaxies suggest that BHs co-evolve with galaxies. However, what is the link between BH mass (MBH) and the properties of the host galaxies of active galactic nuclei (AGNs) in the nearby Universe? We measure stellar masses (M*), colours and structural properties for ~11,500 redshift ≤0.35 broad-line AGNs, nearly 40 times more than that in any previous work, as far as we are aware. We find that early-type and late-type AGNs follow a similar MBH–M* relation. The position of AGNs on the MBH–M* plane is connected with the properties of star formation and BH accretion. Our results unveil the evolutionary paths of galaxies on the MBH–M* plane: objects above the relation tend to evolve more horizontally, with substantial M* growth; objects on the relation move along the local relation; and objects below the relation migrate more vertically, with substantial MBH growth. These trajectories suggest that radiative-mode feedback cannot quench the growth of BHs and their host galaxies for AGNs that lie below the relation, while kinetic-mode feedback barely suppresses long-term star formation for AGNs situated above the relation. This work provides important constraints for numerical simulations and offers a framework for studying the cosmic co-evolution of supermassive BHs and their host galaxies.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Access options
Access Nature and 54 other Nature Portfolio journals
Get Nature+, our best-value online-access subscription
$29.99 / 30 days
cancel any time
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 12 digital issues and online access to articles
$119.00 per year
only $9.92 per issue
Buy this article
- Purchase on Springer Link
- Instant access to full article PDF
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
Similar content being viewed by others
Data availability
Pan-STARRS1 images are available from the Pan-STARRS1 data archive (https://outerspace.stsci.edu/display/PANSTARRS/Pan-STARRS1+data+archive+home+page). The basic properties of the final AGN sample, the PS1 flux densities and the derived physical properties of the host galaxies are available at https://doi.org/10.12149/101278 (ref. 148).
Code availability
Astropy, dustmaps, LOESS, Matplotlib, Numpy and Scipy are available from the Python Package Index (PyPI) (https://pypi.org/). CIGALE is available at https://cigale.lam.fr/. GALFITM is available at https://www.nottingham.ac.uk/astronomy/megamorph/. linmix is available at https://linmix.readthedocs.io/en/latest/. SExtractor and SWarp are available at https://www.astromatic.net/software/.
References
Kormendy, J. & Ho, L. C. Coevolution (or not) of supermassive black holes and host galaxies. Annu. Rev. Astron. Astrophys. 51, 511–653 (2013).
Di Matteo, T., Springel, V. & Hernquist, L. Energy input from quasars regulates the growth and activity of black holes and their host galaxies. Nature 433, 604–607 (2005).
Weinberger, R. et al. Supermassive black holes and their feedback effects in the IllustrisTNG simulation. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 479, 4056–4072 (2018).
Peng, C. Y. How mergers may affect the mass scaling relation between gravitationally bound systems. Astrophys. J. 671, 1098–1107 (2007).
Greene, J. E., Strader, J. & Ho, L. C. Intermediate-mass black holes. Annu. Rev. Astron. Astrophys. 58, 257–312 (2020).
Vestergaard, M. & Peterson, B. M. Determining central black hole masses in distant active galaxies and quasars. II. Improved optical and UV scaling relationships. Astrophys. J. 641, 689–709 (2006).
Wang, J.-G. et al. Estimating black hole masses in active galactic nuclei using the Mg II λ2800 emission line. Astrophys. J. 707, 1334–1346 (2009).
Peng, C. Y. et al. Probing the coevolution of supermassive black holes and galaxies using gravitationally lensed quasar hosts. Astrophys. J. 649, 616–634 (2006).
Alexander, D. M. et al. Weighing the black holes in z ≈ 2 submillimeter-emitting galaxies hosting active galactic nuclei. Astron. J. 135, 1968–1981 (2008).
Schulze, A. & Wisotzki, L. Accounting for selection effects in the BH-bulge relations: no evidence for cosmological evolution. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 438, 3422–3433 (2014).
Neeleman, M. et al. The kinematics of z ≳ 6 quasar host galaxies. Astrophys. J. 911, 141 (2021).
Kelly, B. C. Some aspects of measurement error in linear regression of astronomical data. Astrophys. J. 665, 1489–1506 (2007).
Bennert, V. N. et al. A local baseline of the black hole mass scaling relations for active galaxies. IV. Correlations between MBH and host galaxy σ, stellar mass, and luminosity. Astrophys. J. 921, 36 (2021).
Reines, A. E. & Volonteri, M. Relations between central black hole mass and total galaxy stellar mass in the local universe. Astrophys. J. 813, 82 (2015).
Kim, M. & Ho, L. C. Evidence for a young stellar population in nearby type 1 active galaxies. Astrophys. J. 876, 35 (2019).
Ho, L. C. Nuclear activity in nearby galaxies. Annu. Rev. Astron. Astrophys. 46, 475–539 (2008).
Boroson, T. A. & Green, R. F. The emission-line properties of low-redshift quasi-stellar objects. Astrophys. J. Suppl. Ser. 80, 109 (1992).
Urrutia, T. et al. Spitzer observations of young red quasars. Astrophys. J. 757, 125 (2012).
Sun, M. et al. Evolution in the black hole—galaxy scaling relations and the duty cycle of nuclear activity in star-forming galaxies. Astrophys. J. 802, 14 (2015).
Zhao, Y. et al. The diverse morphology, stellar population, and black hole scaling relations of the host galaxies of nearby quasars. Astrophys. J. 911, 94 (2021).
Mathur, S., Fields, D., Peterson, B. M. & Grupe, D. Supermassive black holes, pseudobulges, and the narrow-line Seyfert 1 galaxies. Astrophys. J. 754, 146 (2012).
Greene, J. E. & Ho, L. C. The MBH–σ* relation in local active galaxies. Astrophys. J. Lett. 641, L21–L24 (2006).
Madau, P. & Dickinson, M. Cosmic star-formation history. Annu. Rev. Astron. Astrophys. 52, 415–486 (2014).
Graham, A. W. & Sahu, N. Appreciating mergers for understanding the non-linear Mbh-M*,spheroid and MbhM*,galaxy relations, updated herein, and the implications for the (reduced) role of AGN feedback. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 518, 2177–2200 (2023).
Steinborn, L. K. et al. Cosmological simulations of black hole growth II: how (in)significant are merger events for fuelling nuclear activity? Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 481, 341–360 (2018).
Zhuang, M.-Y. & Ho, L. C. The interplay between star formation and black hole accretion in nearby active galaxies. Astrophys. J. 896, 108 (2020).
Zhuang, M.-Y. & Ho, L. C. The star-forming main sequence of the host galaxies of low-redshift quasars. Astrophys. J. 934, 130 (2022).
Farrah, D. et al. Stellar and black hole assembly in z < 0.3 infrared-luminous mergers: intermittent starbursts versus super-Eddington accretion. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 513, 4770–4786 (2022).
Borys, C. et al. The relationship between stellar and black hole mass in submillimeter galaxies. Astrophys. J. 635, 853–863 (2005).
Veilleux, S. et al. A deep Hubble Space Telescope H-band imaging survey of massive gas-rich mergers. Astrophys. J. 643, 707–723 (2006).
Chen, C.-C. et al. JWST sneaks a peek at the stellar morphology of z ~ 2 submillimeter galaxies: bulge formation at cosmic noon. Astrophys. J. Lett. 939, L7 (2022).
Greve, T. R. et al. An interferometric CO survey of luminous submillimetre galaxies. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 359, 1165–1183 (2005).
Shangguan, J. et al. Interstellar medium and star formation of starburst galaxies on the merger sequence. Astrophys. J. 870, 104 (2019).
Orban de Xivry, G. et al. The role of secular evolution in the black hole growth of narrow-line Seyfert 1 galaxies. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 417, 2721–2736 (2011).
Shangguan, J., Ho, L. C., Bauer, F. E., Wang, R. & Treister, E. AGN feedback and star formation of quasar host galaxies: insights from the molecular gas. Astrophys. J. 899, 112 (2020).
Xie, Y., Ho, L. C., Zhuang, M.-Y. & Shangguan, J. The infrared emission and vigorous star formation of low-redshift quasars. Astrophys. J. 910, 124 (2021).
Kennicutt, J. & Robert, C. The global Schmidt law in star-forming galaxies. Astrophys. J. 498, 541–552 (1998).
Martini, P. in Coevolution of Black Holes and Galaxes (ed. Ho, L. C.) Ch. 11 (Cambridge Univ. Press, 2004).
Habouzit, M., Volonteri, M. & Dubois, Y. Blossoms from black hole seeds: properties and early growth regulated by supernova feedback. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 468, 3935–3948 (2017).
Çatmabacak, O. et al. Black hole-galaxy scaling relations in FIRE: the importance of black hole location and mergers. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 511, 506–535 (2022).
Koss, M. J. et al. BAT AGN spectroscopic survey. XX. Molecular gas in nearby hard-X-ray-selected AGN galaxies. Astrophys. J. Suppl. Ser. 252, 29 (2021).
Molina, J. et al. Compact molecular gas distribution in quasar host galaxies. Astrophys. J. 908, 231 (2021).
Aird, J., Coil, A. L. & Georgakakis, A. X-rays across the galaxy population–III. The incidence of AGN as a function of star formation rate. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 484, 4360–4378 (2019).
Decarli, R. et al. An ALMA [C II] survey of 27 quasars at z > 5.94. Astrophys. J. 854, 97 (2018).
Inayoshi, K., Visbal, E. & Haiman, Z. The assembly of the first massive black holes. Annu. Rev. Astron. Astrophys. 58, 27–97 (2020).
Daddi, E. et al. Passively evolving early-type galaxies at 1.4 ≲ z ≲ 2.5 in the Hubble ultra deep field. Astrophys. J. 626, 680–697 (2005).
van Dokkum, P. G. et al. The growth of massive galaxies since z = 2. Astrophys. J. 709, 1018–1041 (2010).
Oser, L., Ostriker, J. P., Naab, T., Johansson, P. H. & Burkert, A. The two phases of galaxy formation. Astrophys. J. 725, 2312–2323 (2010).
Davari, R. H., Ho, L. C., Mobasher, B. & Canalizo, G. Detection of prominent stellar disks in the progenitors of present-day massive elliptical galaxies. Astrophys. J. 836, 75 (2017).
Zhuang, M.-Y., Ho, L. C. & Shangguan, J. Black hole accretion correlates with star formation rate and star formation efficiency in nearby luminous type 1 active galaxies. Astrophys. J. 906, 38 (2021).
Ward, S. R., Harrison, C. M., Costa, T. & Mainieri, V. Cosmological simulations predict that AGN preferentially live in gas-rich, star-forming galaxies despite effective feedback. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 514, 2936–2957 (2022).
King, A. & Pounds, K. Powerful outflows and feedback from active galactic nuclei. Annu. Rev. Astron. Astrophys. 53, 115–154 (2015).
Tremaine, S. et al. The slope of the black hole mass versus velocity dispersion correlation. Astrophys. J. 574, 740–753 (2002).
Gao, H., Ho, L. C., Barth, A. J. & Li, Z.-Y. The Carnegie-Irvine galaxy survey. VIII. Demographics of bulges along the Hubble sequence. Astrophys. J. Suppl. Ser. 244, 34 (2019).
Ding, Y., Li, R., Ho, L. C. & Ricci, C. Accretion disk outflow during the X-ray flare of the super-Eddington active nucleus of I Zwicky 1. Astrophys. J. 931, 77 (2022).
Davé, R. et al. SIMBA: cosmological simulations with black hole growth and feedback. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 486, 2827–2849 (2019).
Liu, H.-Y. et al. A comprehensive and uniform sample of broad-line active galactic nuclei from the SDSS DR7. Astrophys. J. Suppl. Ser. 243, 21 (2019).
Abazajian, K. N. et al. The seventh data release of the Sloan Digital Sky Survey. Astrophys. J. Suppl. Ser. 182, 543–558 (2009).
York, D. G. et al. The Sloan Digital Sky Survey: technical summary. Astron. J. 120, 1579–1587 (2000).
Shen, Y. et al. A catalog of quasar properties from Sloan Digital Sky Survey data release 7. Astrophys. J. Suppl. Ser. 194, 45 (2011).
Oh, K. et al. A new catalog of type 1 AGNs and its implications on the AGN unified model. Astrophys. J. Suppl. Ser. 219, 1 (2015).
Lyke, B. W. et al. The Sloan Digital Sky Survey quasar catalog: sixteenth data release. Astrophys. J. Suppl. Ser. 250, 8 (2020).
Rakshit, S., Stalin, C. S. & Kotilainen, J. Spectral properties of quasars from Sloan Digital Sky Survey data release 14: the catalog. Astrophys. J. Suppl. Ser. 249, 17 (2020).
McLure, R. J. & Dunlop, J. S. The cosmological evolution of quasar black hole masses. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 352, 1390–1404 (2004).
Ho, L. C. & Kim, M. A revised calibration of the virial mass estimator for black holes in active galaxies based on single-epoch Hβ spectra. Astrophys. J. 809, 123 (2015).
Ho, L. C. & Kim, M. The black hole mass scale of classical and pseudo bulges in active galaxies. Astrophys. J. 789, 17 (2014).
Greene, J. E. & Ho, L. C. Estimating black hole masses in active galaxies using the Hα emission line. Astrophys. J. 630, 122–129 (2005).
Woo, J.-H., Yoon, Y., Park, S., Park, D. & Kim, S. C. The black hole mass–stellar velocity dispersion relation of narrow-line Seyfert 1 galaxies. Astrophys. J. 801, 38 (2015).
Du, P. et al. Supermassive black holes with high accretion rates in active galactic nuclei. V. A new size-luminosity scaling relation for the broad-line region. Astrophys. J. 825, 126 (2016).
Du, P. & Wang, J.-M. The radius–luminosity relationship depends on optical spectra in active galactic nuclei. Astrophys. J. 886, 42 (2019).
Dalla Bontà, E. et al. The Sloan Digital Sky Survey reverberation mapping project: estimating masses of black holes in quasars with single-epoch spectroscopy. Astrophys. J. 903, 112 (2020).
Fonseca Alvarez, G. et al. The Sloan Digital Sky Survey reverberation mapping project: the Hβ radius-luminosity relation. Astrophys. J. 899, 73 (2020).
Treu, T., Woo, J.-H., Malkan, M. A. & Blandford, R. D. Cosmic evolution of black holes and spheroids. II. Scaling relations at z=0.36. Astrophys. J. 667, 117–130 (2007).
Bennert, V. N. et al. Cosmic evolution of black holes and spheroids. IV. The MBH-Lsph relation. Astrophys. J. 708, 1507–1527 (2010).
Falomo, R., Bettoni, D., Karhunen, K., Kotilainen, J. K. & Uslenghi, M. Low-redshift quasars in the Sloan Digital Sky Survey Stripe 82. The host galaxies. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 440, 476–493 (2014).
Matsuoka, Y., Strauss, M. A., Price, I., Ted, N. & DiDonato, M. S. Massive star-forming host galaxies of quasars on Sloan Digital Sky Survey Stripe 82. Astrophys. J. 780, 162 (2014).
Bentz, M. C. & Manne-Nicholas, E. Black hole–galaxy scaling relationships for active galactic nuclei with reverberation masses. Astrophys. J. 864, 146 (2018).
Ishino, T. et al. Subaru Hyper Suprime-Cam view of quasar host galaxies at z < 1. Publ. Astron. Soc. Jpn 72, 83 (2020).
Li, J. et al. The sizes of quasar host galaxies in the Hyper Suprime-Cam Subaru Strategic Program. Astrophys. J. 918, 22 (2021).
Li, J. I. H. et al. The Sloan Digital Sky Survey reverberation mapping project: the MBH-host relations at 0.2 ≲ z ≲ 0.6 from reverberation mapping and Hubble Space Telescope imaging. Astrophys. J. 906, 103 (2021).
Son, S., Kim, M., Barth, A. J. & Ho, L. C. Relation between black hole mass and bulge luminosity in hard X-ray selected type 1 AGNs. J. Korean Astron. Soc. 55, 37–57 (2022).
Heckman, T. M. An optical and radio survey of the nuclei of bright galaxies - activity in the normal galactic nuclei. Astron. Astrophys. 87, 152 (1980).
Baldwin, J. A., Phillips, M. M. & Terlevich, R. Classification parameters for the emission-line spectra of extragalactic objects. Publ. Astron. Soc. Pac. 93, 5–19 (1981).
Chambers, K. C. et al. The Pan-STARRS1 surveys. Preprint at https://arxiv.org/abs/1612.05560 (2016).
Kron, R. G. Photometry of a complete sample of faint galaxies. Astrophys. J. Suppl. Ser. 43, 305–325 (1980).
Flewelling, H. A. et al. The Pan-STARRS1 database and data products. Astrophys. J. Suppl. Ser. 251, 7 (2020).
Bertin, E. & Arnouts, S. SExtractor: software for source extraction. Astron. Astrophys. Suppl. 117, 393–404 (1996).
Bertin, E. et al. in Astronomical Data Analysis Software and Systems XI, ASP Conference Series, Vol. 281 of (eds Bohlender, D. et al.) 228 (ASP, 2002).
Farrow, D. J. et al. Pan-STARRS1: galaxy clustering in the Small Area Survey 2. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 437, 748–770 (2014).
Moffat, A. F. J. A theoretical investigation of focal stellar images in the photographic emulsion and application to photographic photometry. Astron. Astrophys. 3, 455 (1969).
Häußler, B. et al. MegaMorph–multiwavelength measurement of galaxy structure: complete Sérsic profile information from modern surveys. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 430, 330–369 (2013).
Vika, M. et al. MegaMorph - multiwavelength measurement of galaxy structure. Sérsic profile fits to galaxies near and far. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 435, 623–649 (2013).
Sersic, J. L. Atlas de Galaxias Australes (Observatorio Astronomico, 1968).
Kelvin, L. S. et al. Galaxy And Mass Assembly (GAMA): structural investigation of galaxies via model analysis. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 421, 1007–1039 (2012).
Peng, C. Y., Ho, L. C., Impey, C. D. & Rix, H.-W. Detailed structural decomposition of galaxy images. Astron. J. 124, 266–293 (2002).
Peng, C. Y., Ho, L. C., Impey, C. D. & Rix, H.-W. Detailed decomposition of galaxy images. II. Beyond axisymmetric models. Astron. J. 139, 2097–2129 (2010).
Häußler, B. et al. GALAPAGOS-2/GALFITM/GAMA–Multi-wavelength measurement of galaxy structure: separating the properties of spheroid and disk components in modern surveys. Astron. Astrophys. 664, A92 (2022).
Zhuang, M.-Y. & Shen, Y. Characterization of JWST NIRCam PSFs and implications for AGN+Host image decomposition. Preprint at https://arxiv.org/abs/2304.13776 (2023).
Casura, S. et al. Galaxy And Mass Assembly (GAMA): bulge-disc decomposition of KiDS data in the nearby universe. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 516, 942–974 (2022).
Häussler, B. et al. GEMS: galaxy fitting catalogs and testing parametric galaxy fitting codes: GALFIT and GIM2D. Astrophys. J. Suppl. Ser. 172, 615–633 (2007).
Gao, H. & Ho, L. C. An optimal strategy for accurate bulge-to-disk decomposition of disk galaxies. Astrophys. J. 845, 114 (2017).
Fan, L. et al. Structure and morphology of X-ray-selected active galactic nucleus hosts at 1 < z < 3 in the CANDELS-COSMOS field. Astrophys. J. Lett. 784, L9 (2014).
Simard, L., Mendel, J. T., Patton, D. R., Ellison, S. L. & McConnachie, A. W. A catalog of bulge+disk decompositions and updated photometry for 1.12 million galaxies in the Sloan Digital Sky Survey. Astrophys. J. Suppl. Ser. 196, 11 (2011).
Richards, G. T. et al. Spectral energy distributions and multiwavelength selection of type 1 quasars. Astrophys. J. Suppl. Ser. 166, 470–497 (2006).
Boquien, M. et al. CIGALE: a Python Code Investigating GALaxy Emission. Astron. Astrophys. 622, A103 (2019).
Yang, G. et al. Fitting AGN/galaxy X-ray-to-radio SEDs with CIGALE and improvement of the code. Astrophys. J. 927, 192 (2022).
Green, G. M. dustmaps: A Python interface for maps of interstellar dust. J. Open Source Softw. 3, 695 (2018).
Schlegel, D. J., Finkbeiner, D. P. & Davis, M. Maps of dust infrared emission for use in estimation of reddening and cosmic microwave background radiation foregrounds. Astrophys. J. 500, 525–553 (1998).
Schlafly, E. F. & Finkbeiner, D. P. Measuring reddening with Sloan Digital Sky Survey stellar spectra and recalibrating SFD. Astrophys. J. 737, 103 (2011).
Bruzual, G. & Charlot, S. Stellar population synthesis at the resolution of 2003. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 344, 1000–1028 (2003).
Inoue, A. K. Rest-frame ultraviolet-to-optical spectral characteristics of extremely metal-poor and metal-free galaxies. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 415, 2920–2931 (2011).
Calzetti, D. et al. The dust content and opacity of actively star-forming galaxies. Astrophys. J. 533, 682–695 (2000).
Mitchell, P. D., Lacey, C. G., Baugh, C. M. & Cole, S. How well can we really estimate the stellar masses of galaxies from broad-band photometry? Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 435, 87–114 (2013).
Ciesla, L. et al. Constraining the properties of AGN host galaxies with spectral energy distribution modelling. Astron. Astrophys. 576, A10 (2015).
Chabrier, G. Galactic stellar and substellar initial mass function. Publ. Astron. Soc. Pac. 115, 763–795 (2003).
Kroupa, P. On the variation of the initial mass function. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 322, 231–246 (2001).
Bell, E. F., McIntosh, D. H., Katz, N. & Weinberg, M. D. The optical and near-infrared properties of galaxies. I. Luminosity and stellar mass functions. Astrophys. J. Suppl. Ser. 149, 289–312 (2003).
Stalevski, M., Fritz, J., Baes, M., Nakos, T. & Popović, L. Č. 3D radiative transfer modelling of the dusty tori around active galactic nuclei as a clumpy two-phase medium. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 420, 2756–2772 (2012).
Stalevski, M. et al. The dust covering factor in active galactic nuclei. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 458, 2288–2302 (2016).
Baldry, I. K. et al. Quantifying the bimodal color-magnitude distribution of galaxies. Astrophys. J. 600, 681–694 (2004).
Blanton, M. R. & Moustakas, J. Physical properties and environments of nearby galaxies. Annu. Rev. Astron. Astrophys. 47, 159–210 (2009).
Blanton, M. R. et al. The broadband optical properties of galaxies with redshifts 0.02 < z < 0.22. Astrophys. J. 594, 186–207 (2003).
Magorrian, J. et al. The demography of massive dark objects in galaxy centers. Astron. J. 115, 2285–2305 (1998).
Trump, J. R. et al. A census of broad-line active galactic nuclei in nearby galaxies: coeval star formation and rapid black hole growth. Astrophys. J. 763, 133 (2013).
Salim, S. et al. GALEX-SDSS-WISE Legacy Catalog (GSWLC): star formation rates, stellar masses, and dust attenuations of 700,000 low-redshift galaxies. Astrophys. J. Suppl. Ser. 227, 2 (2016).
Salim, S., Boquien, M. & Lee, J. C. Dust attenuation curves in the local universe: demographics and new laws for star-forming galaxies and high-redshift analogs. Astrophys. J. 859, 11 (2018).
Weinmann, S. M., van den Bosch, F. C., Yang, X. & Mo, H. J. Properties of galaxy groups in the Sloan Digital Sky Survey - I. The dependence of colour, star formation and morphology on halo mass. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 366, 2–28 (2006).
Huang, S., Haynes, M. P., Giovanelli, R. & Brinchmann, J. The Arecibo Legacy Fast ALFA Survey: the galaxy population detected by ALFALFA. Astrophys. J. 756, 113 (2012).
Brinchmann, J. et al. The physical properties of star-forming galaxies in the low-redshift Universe. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 351, 1151–1179 (2004).
Ravindranath, S. et al. The evolution of disk galaxies in the GOODS-south field: number densities and size distribution. Astrophys. J. Lett. 604, L9–L12 (2004).
Gabor, J. M. et al. Active galactic nucleus host galaxy morphologies in COSMOS. Astrophys. J. 691, 705–722 (2009).
Dewsnap, C. et al. GALFIT-ing AGN host galaxies in COSMOS: HST versus Subaru. Astrophys. J. 944, 137 (2023).
Willett, K. W. et al. Galaxy Zoo 2: detailed morphological classifications for 304 122 galaxies from the Sloan Digital Sky Survey. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 435, 2835–2860 (2013).
Hart, R. E. et al. Galaxy Zoo: comparing the demographics of spiral arm number and a new method for correcting redshift bias. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 461, 3663–3682 (2016).
Kormendy, J., Kennicutt, J. & Robert, C. Secular evolution and the formation of pseudobulges in disk galaxies. Annu. Rev. Astron. Astrophys. 42, 603–683 (2004).
Gao, H., Ho, L. C., Barth, A. J. & Li, Z.-Y. The Carnegie-Irvine Galaxy Survey. IX. Classification of bulge types and statistical properties of pseudo bulges. Astrophys. J. Suppl. Ser. 247, 20 (2020).
Kim, M., Ho, L. C., Peng, C. Y., Barth, A. J. & Im, M. Stellar photometric structures of the host galaxies of nearby type 1 active galactic nuclei. Astrophys. J. Suppl. Ser. 232, 21 (2017).
Kim, M., Barth, A. J., Ho, L. C. & Son, S. A Hubble Space Telescope imaging survey of low-redshift Swift-BAT active galaxies. Astrophys. J. Suppl. Ser. 256, 40 (2021).
Zhao, D., Ho, L. C., Zhao, Y., Shangguan, J. & Kim, M. The role of major mergers and nuclear star formation in nearby obscured quasars. Astrophys. J. 877, 52 (2019).
Martín-Navarro, I., Shankar, F. & Mezcua, M. Rejuvenation triggers nuclear activity in nearby galaxies. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 513, L10–L14 (2022).
Frank, J., King, A. & Raine, D. Accretion Power in Astrophysics (Cambridge Univ. Press, 1992).
Aversa, R., Lapi, A., de Zotti, G., Shankar, F. & Danese, L. Black hole and galaxy coevolution from continuity equation and abundance matching. Astrophys. J. 810, 74 (2015).
Delvecchio, I. et al. The evolving AGN duty cycle in galaxies since z ~ 3 as encoded in the X-ray luminosity function. Astrophys. J. 892, 17 (2020).
Ananna, T. T. et al. BASS. XXX. Distribution functions of DR2 Eddington ratios, black hole masses, and X-ray luminosities. Astrophys. J. Suppl. Ser. 261, 9 (2022).
Lamperti, I. et al. BAT AGN spectroscopic survey - IV: Near-infrared coronal lines, hidden broad lines, and correlation with hard X-ray emission. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 467, 540–572 (2017).
Ricci, F. et al. BASS. XXIX. The near-infrared view of the broad-line region (BLR): the effects of obscuration in BLR characterization. Astrophys. J. Suppl. Ser. 261, 8 (2022).
Abbott, T. M. C. et al. The Dark Energy Survey data release 2. Astrophys. J. Suppl. Ser. 255, 20 (2021).
Zhuang, M.-Y. & Ho, L. C. Basic information and derived properties of the final AGN sample. National Astronomical Data Center of China https://doi.org/10.12149/101278 (2023).
Cappellari, M. et al. The ATLAS3D project - XX. Mass-size and mass-σ distributions of early-type galaxies: bulge fraction drives kinematics, mass-to-light ratio, molecular gas fraction and stellar initial mass function. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 432, 1862–1893 (2013).
Acknowledgements
This work was supported by the National Key R&D Program of China (grant no. 2022YFF0503401), the National Science Foundation of China (grant nos. 11721303, 11991052, 12011540375 and 12233001) and the China Manned Space Project (grant nos. CMS-CSST-2021-A04 and CMS-CSST-2021-A06).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
M.-Y.Z. and L.C.H. developed and discussed the idea. M.-Y.Z. reduced the data, performed the analyses and wrote the paper. L.C.H. revised the paper.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Peer review
Peer review information
Nature Astronomy thanks the anonymous reviewers for their contribution to the peer review of this work.
Additional information
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Extended data
Extended Data Fig. 1 Rest-frame SDSS \({g}^{{\prime} }-{r}^{{\prime} }\) colour [\({({g}^{{\prime} }-{r}^{{\prime} })}_{0}\)] versus stellar mass (M*) for the inactive galaxy sample (red) and AGN sample (blue).
Objects with z < 0.15 are shown in panel (a), and objects with 0.15≤z≤0.35 are shown in panel (b). Contours indicate the distribution of 10%, 30%, 60%, and 90% of the entire sample, respectively. Dots are individual objects located outside the 90% contour. The lower-right corner of each panel shows the typical uncertainties.
Extended Data Fig. 2 The relation between MBH and M* for z≤0.35 type 1 AGNs without smoothing.
Colours represent (a) rest-frame optical colour \({({g}^{{\prime} }-{r}^{{\prime} })}_{0}\), (b) Eddington ratio (λE), and (c) relative Fe II strength. Best-fit relations from ref. 5 for local early-type galaxies (black dashed line), late-type galaxies (black dotted line), and both types combined (black solid line; intrinsic scatter of 0.81 dex indicated as shaded gray region). This figure shows the version of Fig. 2 without smoothing to demonstrate that the trends are still present in the original data.
Extended Data Fig. 3 The relation between MBH and M* for z≤0.35 type 1 AGNs without smoothing and with MBH derived from broad Hα emission with a virial factor f = 4.47.
Colours represent (a) rest-frame optical colour \({({g}^{{\prime} }-{r}^{{\prime} })}_{0}\), (b) Eddington ratio (λE), and (c) relative Fe II strength. Best-fit relations from ref. 5 for local early-type galaxies (black dashed line), late-type galaxies (black dotted line), and both types combined (black solid line; intrinsic scatter of 0.81 dex indicated as shaded gray region). This figure demonstrates that switching to the Hα-based MBH estimator does not qualitatively affect our main conclusions.
Extended Data Fig. 4 Rest-frame SDSS \({g}^{{\prime} }-{r}^{{\prime} }\) colour [\({({g}^{{\prime} }-{r}^{{\prime} })}_{0}\)] versus stellar mass (M*) for AGNs.
AGNs with early-type and late-type morphologies are shown in magenta and green, respectively. Objects with z < 0.15 are shown in panel (a), and objects with 0.15≤z≤0.35 are shown in panel (b). Contours indicate the distribution of 10%, 30%, 60%, and 90% of the entire sample, respectively. Dots are individual objects located outside the 90% contour. The lower-right corner of each panel shows the typical uncertainties.
Extended Data Fig. 5 The relation between MBH and M* for local (z < 0.1) type 2 AGNs.
BH masses are derived from broad emission lines in the near-infrared (see Methods). Their evolution to z = 0 is indicated by the direction and length of each arrow. Best-fit relations from ref. 5 for local early-type galaxies (black dashed line), late-type galaxies (black dotted line), and both types combined (black solid line; intrinsic scatter of 0.81 dex indicated as shaded gray region). Typical uncertainties are shown in the lower-right corner.
Extended Data Fig. 6 Rest-frame optical colour \({({g}^{{\prime} }-{r}^{{\prime} })}_{0}\) versus λE for AGNs.
AGNs with early-type, late-type, and both types combined morphologies are shown in magenta, green, and black, respectively. Contours indicate the distribution of 10%, 30%, 60%, and 90% of the entire sample, respectively. Dots are individual objects located outside the 90% contour. Thick solid and dashed lines represent 50th, 16th, and 84th percentiles of the objects. The Spearman correlation coefficient ρ and p-value are shown in the lower-left corner. Typical uncertainties are shown in the upper-right corner.
Extended Data Fig. 7 The relation between MBH and Mbulge for z≤0.35 AGNs with MBH growth fraction larger than 20%.
Colours represent growth fraction of MBH. Mbulge is predicted from M* with a bulge-to-total ratio of 0.2. We show the best-fit relations from ref. 5 for local early-type galaxies (black dashed line), late-type galaxies (black dotted line), and both types combined (black solid line; intrinsic scatter of 0.81 dex indicated as shaded gray region).
Supplementary information
Supplementary Information
Supplementary Tables 1 and 2 and Figs. 1–12.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Zhuang, MY., Ho, L.C. Evolutionary paths of active galactic nuclei and their host galaxies. Nat Astron 7, 1376–1389 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41550-023-02051-4
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41550-023-02051-4
This article is cited by
-
Black holes as the source of dark energy: A stringent test with high-redshift JWST AGNs
Science China Physics, Mechanics & Astronomy (2024)
-
A dynamical measure of the black hole mass in a quasar 11 billion years ago
Nature (2024)