There has been substantial interest in modifications of the standard Λ cold dark matter (ΛCDM, where Λ is the cosmological constant) cosmological model prompted by tensions between certain datasets, most notably the Hubble tension. The late-time modifications of the ΛCDM model can be parameterized by three time-dependent functions describing the expansion history of the Universe and gravitational effects on light and matter in the large-scale structure. We perform a joint Bayesian reconstruction of these three functions from a combination of recent cosmological observations, utilizing a theory-informed prior built on the general Horndeski class of scalar–tensor theories. This reconstruction is interpreted in light of the well-known Hubble constant, clustering amplitude S8 and lensing amplitude AL tensions. We identify the phenomenological features that alternative theories would need to have to ease some of these tensions, and deduce important constraints on broad classes of modified gravity models. Among other things, our findings suggest that late-time dynamical dark energy and modifications of gravity are not likely to offer a solution to the Hubble tension, or simultaneously solve the AL and S8 tensions.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Subscribe to Nature+
Get immediate online access to Nature and 55 other Nature journal
Subscribe to Journal
Get full journal access for 1 year
only $9.92 per issue
All prices are NET prices.
VAT will be added later in the checkout.
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.
All prices are NET prices.
The observational data used in this work are publicly available and referenced in the Article. Our work involves a lot of intermediate stages and different types of data, sharing it all is not feasible. Nevertheless, the data that support the plots within this Article and other findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.
Silvestri, A. & Trodden, M. Approaches to understanding cosmic acceleration. Rep. Prog. Phys. 72, 096901 (2009).
Joyce, A., Jain, B., Khoury, J. & Trodden, M. Beyond the cosmological standard model. Phys. Rep. 568, 1–98 (2015).
Koyama, K. Cosmological tests of modified gravity. Rep. Prog. Phys. 79, 046902 (2016).
Aghanim, N. et al. Planck 2018 results. VI. Cosmological parameters. Astron. Astrophys. 641, A6 (2020).
Riess, A. G. et al. A comprehensive measurement of the local value of the Hubble constant with 1 km/s/Mpc uncertainty from the Hubble Space Telescope and the SH0ES Team. Astrophys. J. Lett. 934, L7 (2022).
Abdalla, E. et al. Cosmology intertwined: a review of the particle physics, astrophysics, and cosmology associated with the cosmological tensions and anomalies. J. High Energy Astrophys. 34, 49–211 (2022).
Freedman, W. L. et al. Calibration of the tip of the red giant branch (TRGB). Preprint at https://arxiv.org/abs/2002.01550 (2020).
Freedman, W. L. Measurements of the Hubble constant: tensions in perspective. Astrophys. J. 919, 16 (2021).
Abbott, T. M. C. et al. Dark Energy Survey Year 3 results: cosmological constraints from galaxy clustering and weak lensing. Preprint at https://arxiv.org/abs/2105.13549 (2021).
Asgari, M. et al. KiDS-1000 cosmology: cosmic shear constraints and comparison between two point statistics. Preprint at https://arxiv.org/abs/2007.15633 (2020).
Hikage, C. et al. Cosmology from cosmic shear power spectra with Subaru Hyper Suprime-Cam first-year data. Publ. Astron. Soc. Jpn 71, 43 (2019).
Efstathiou, G. & Lemos, P. Statistical inconsistencies in the KiDS-450 data set. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 476, 151–157 (2018).
Efstathiou, G. A lockdown perspective on the Hubble tension (with comments from the SH0ES team). Preprint at https://arxiv.org/abs/2007.10716 (2020).
Will, C. M. The confrontation between general relativity and experiment. Living Rev. Rel. 17, 4 (2014).
Abbott, B. P. et al. Observation of gravitational waves from a binary black hole merger. Phys. Rev. Lett. 116, 061102 (2016).
Abbott, B. et al. GW170817: observation of gravitational waves from a binary neutron star inspiral. Phys. Rev. Lett. 119, 161101 (2017).
Akiyama, K. et al. First M87 Event Horizon telescope results. I. The shadow of the supermassive black hole. Astrophys. J. Lett. 875, L1 (2019).
Riess, A. G. et al. Observational evidence from supernovae for an accelerating universe and a cosmological constant. Astron. J. 116, 1009–1038 (1998).
Perlmutter, S. et al. Measurements of Ω and Λ from 42 high redshift supernovae. Astrophys. J. 517, 565–586 (1999).
Burgess, C. P. The cosmological constant problem: why it’s hard to get dark energy from micro-physics. In 100e Ecole d’Ete de Physique: Post-Planck Cosmology 149–197 (eds Deffayet, C. et al.) (Oxford University Press, 2015).
Horndeski, G. W. Second-order scalar-tensor field equations in a four-dimensional space. Int. J. Theor. Phys. 10, 363–384 (1974).
Vainshtein, A. I. To the problem of nonvanishing gravitation mass. Phys. Lett. B39, 393–394 (1972).
Damour, T. & Polyakov, A. M. The string dilation and a least coupling principle. Nucl. Phys. B 423, 532–558 (1994).
Khoury, J. & Weltman, A. Chameleon fields: awaiting surprises for tests of gravity in space. Phys. Rev. Lett. 93, 171104 (2004).
Hinterbichler, K. & Khoury, J. Symmetron fields: screening long-range forces through local symmetry restoration. Phys. Rev. Lett. 104, 231301 (2010).
Amendola, L., Kunz, M. & Sapone, D. Measuring the dark side (with weak lensing). J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 04, 013 (2008).
Bertschinger, E. & Zukin, P. Distinguishing modified gravity from dark energy. Phys. Rev. D 78, 024015 (2008).
Pogosian, L., Silvestri, A., Koyama, K. & Zhao, G.-B. How to optimally parametrize deviations from general relativity in the evolution of cosmological perturbations? Phys. Rev. D 81, 104023 (2010).
Gubitosi, G., Piazza, F. & Vernizzi, F. The effective field theory of dark energy. J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 02, 032 (2013).
Bloomfield, J. K., Flanagan, E. E., Park, M. & Watson, S. Dark energy or modified gravity? An effective field theory approach. J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 1308, 010 (2013).
Gleyzes, J., Langlois, D. & Vernizzi, F. A unifying description of dark energy. Int. J. Mod. Phys. D 23, 1443010 (2015).
Bellini, E. & Sawicki, I. Maximal freedom at minimum cost: linear large-scale structure in general modifications of gravity. J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 07, 050 (2014).
Zhao, G.-B., Pogosian, L., Silvestri, A. & Zylberberg, J. Searching for modified growth patterns with tomographic surveys. Phys. Rev. D 79, 083513 (2009).
Hojjati, A., Pogosian, L. & Zhao, G.-B. Testing gravity with CAMB and CosmoMC. J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 08, 005 (2011).
Hu, B., Raveri, M., Frusciante, N. & Silvestri, A. Effective field theory of cosmic acceleration: an implementation in CAMB. Phys. Rev. D 89, 103530 (2014).
Zumalacarregui, M., Bellini, E., Sawicki, I. & Lesgourgues, J. hi_class: Horndeski in the cosmic linear anisotropy solving system. Preprint at https://arxiv.org/abs/1605.06102 (2016).
Song, Y.-S. et al. Complementarity of weak lensing and peculiar velocity measurements in testing general relativity. Phys. Rev. D 84, 083523 (2011).
Saltas, I. D., Sawicki, I., Amendola, L. & Kunz, M. Anisotropic stress as a signature of nonstandard propagation of gravitational waves. Phys. Rev. Lett. 113, 191101 (2014).
Pogosian, L. & Silvestri, A. What can cosmology tell us about gravity? Constraining Horndeski with Σ and μ. Phys. Rev. D 94, 104014 (2016).
Silvestri, A., Pogosian, L. & Buniy, R. V. Practical approach to cosmological perturbations in modified gravity. Phys. Rev. D 87, 104015 (2013).
Espejo, J. et al. Phenomenology of large scale structure in scalar-tensor theories: joint prior covariance of wDE, Σ and μ in Horndeski. Phys. Rev. D 99, 023512 (2019).
Gleyzes, J., Langlois, D., Mancarella, M. & Vernizzi, F. Effective theory of dark energy at redshift survey scales. J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 02, 056 (2016).
Abbott, B. P. et al. Gravitational waves and gamma-rays from a binary neutron star merger: GW170817 and GRB 170817A. Astrophys. J. 848, L13 (2017).
Deffayet, C., Esposito-Farese, G. & Vikman, A. Covariant Galileon. Phys. Rev. D 79, 084003 (2009).
Deffayet, C., Pujolas, O., Sawicki, I. & Vikman, A. Imperfect dark energy from kinetic gravity braiding. J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 10, 026 (2010).
Linder, E. V. No slip gravity. J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 03, 005 (2018).
Peirone, S., Koyama, K., Pogosian, L., Raveri, M. & Silvestri, A. Large-scale structure phenomenology of viable Horndeski theories. Phys. Rev. D 97, 043519 (2018).
Zucca, A., Pogosian, L., Silvestri, A. & Zhao, G.-B. MGCAMB with massive neutrinos and dynamical dark energy. J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 05, 001 (2019).
Lewis, A. & Bridle, S. Cosmological parameters from CMB and other data: a Monte- Carlo approach. Phys. Rev. D 66, 103511 (2002).
Lewis, A. GetDist: a Python package for analysing Monte Carlo samples (2019); https://getdist.readthedocs.io
L.P. is supported by the National Sciences and Engineering Research Council (NSERC) of Canada, and by the Chinese Academy of Sciences President’s International Fellowship Initiative, under grant number 2020VMA0020. M.R. is supported in part by NASA ATP grant number NNH17ZDA001N and by funds provided by the Center for Particle Cosmology. K.K. was supported by the European Research Council under the European Union’s Horizon 2020 programme (grant agreement number 646702 ‘CosTesGrav’). K.K. is also supported by the UK STFC grant numbers ST/S000550/1 and ST/W001225/1. M.M. has received support from a fellowship from ‘la Caixa’ Foundation (ID 100010434), with fellowship code LCF/BQ/PI19/11690015, the Spanish Agencia Estatal de Investigacion through the ‘IFT Centro de Excelencia Severo Ochoa SEV-2016-0599’ grant and the Agenzia Spaziale Italiana (ASI) under agreement number 2018-23-HH.0. A.S. acknowledges support from the NWO and the Dutch Ministry of Education, Culture and Science (OCW) (grant number VI.Vidi.192.069). G.-B.Z. is supported by the National Key Basic Research and Development Program of China (grant number 2018YFA0404503), NSFC grant numbers 11925303, 11720101004 and 11890691, a grant from the CAS Interdisciplinary Innovation Team and science research grants from the China Manned Space Project under grant number CMS-CSST-2021-B01. We gratefully acknowledge the use of GetDist50. This research was enabled in part by support provided by WestGrid (www.westgrid.ca), Compute Canada Calcul Canada (www.computecanada.ca) and by the University of Chicago Research Computing Center through the Kavli Institute for Cosmological Physics at the University of Chicago.
The authors declare no competing interests.
Peer review information
Nature Astronomy thanks the anonymous reviewers for their contribution to the peer review of this work
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
About this article
Cite this article
Pogosian, L., Raveri, M., Koyama, K. et al. Imprints of cosmological tensions in reconstructed gravity. Nat Astron (2022). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41550-022-01808-7
This article is cited by
Nature Astronomy (2022)