Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Comment
  • Published:

On the two main classes of active galactic nuclei

Active galactic nuclei (AGNs) are empirically divided into ‘radio-loud’ and ‘radio-quiet’. These 50-year-old labels are obsolete, misleading and wrong. I argue that AGNs should be classified as ‘jetted’ and ‘non-jetted’ based on a physical difference — the presence (or lack) of strong relativistic jets.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1: A schematic representation of the SEDs of AGNs.

References

  1. Sandage, A. Astrophys. J. 141, 1560–1578 (1965).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  2. Padovani, P. Astron. Astrophys. Rev. 24, 13 (2016).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  3. Padovani, P. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 411, 1547–1561 (2011).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  4. Malizia, A. et al. Astrophys. J. Lett. 782, L25 (2014).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  5. Comastri, A., Gilli, R. & Hasinger, G. Exp. Astron. 20, 41–47 (2005).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  6. Ackermann, M. et al. Astrophys. J. 747, 104 (2012).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  7. Ackermann, M. et al. Astrophys. J. 755, 164 (2012).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  8. Urry, C. M. & Padovani, P. Publ. Astron. Soc. Pac. 107, 803–845 (1995).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  9. Heckman, T. M. & Best, P. N. Annu. Rev. Astron. Astrophys. 52, 589–660 (2014).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  10. Padovani, P. et al. Astrophys. J. 740, 20 (2011).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  11. Bonzini, M. et al. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 436, 3759–3771 (2013).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  12. Ho, L. C. & Peng, C. Y. Astrophys. J. 555, 650–662 (2001).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  13. Terashima Y. & Wilson A. S. Astrophys. J. 583, 145–158 (2003).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  14. Hardcastle, M. J., Evans, D. A. & Croston, J. H. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 396, 1929–1952 (2009).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  15. Maini, A., Prandoni, I., Norris, R. P., Giovannini, G. & Spitler, L. R. Astron. Astrophys. 589, L3 (2016).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  16. Middelberg, E. et al. Astron. Astrophys. 417, 925–944 (2004).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  17. Harrison, C. M. Observational Constraints on the Influence of Active Galactic Nuclei on the Evolution of Galaxies (Springer, 2016); http://go.nature.com/2tydJ5I

Download references

Acknowledgements

I thank C. Circosta, C. Ferrari, E. Hatziminaoglou, A. Merloni, F. Panessa, and E. Resconi for helpful comments and C. M. Harrison for producing Fig. 1.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Paolo Padovani.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Padovani, P. On the two main classes of active galactic nuclei. Nat Astron 1, 0194 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41550-017-0194

Download citation

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41550-017-0194

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing