Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

The potential application of probiotics and prebiotics for the prevention and treatment of COVID-19

Abstract

COVID-19 is a pandemic disease caused by the novel coronavirus severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2). This new viral infection was first identified in China in December 2019, and it has subsequently spread globally. The lack of a vaccine or curative treatment for COVID-19 necessitates a focus on other strategies to prevent and treat the infection. Probiotics consist of single or mixed cultures of live microorganisms that can beneficially affect the host by maintaining the intestinal or lung microbiota that play a major role in human health. At present, good scientific evidence exists to support the ability of probiotics to boost human immunity, thereby preventing colonization by pathogens and reducing the incidence and severity of infections. Herein, we present clinical studies of the use of probiotic supplementation to prevent or treat respiratory tract infections. These data lead to promising benefits of probiotics in reducing the risk of COVID-19. Further studies should be conducted to assess the ability of probiotics to combat COVID-19.

Introduction

The evolution and emergence of viruses have significantly increased in the last two decades because of their rapid mutation. The emergence or re-emergence of viruses is attributable to several factors including increased numbers of immunocompromised patients, climate change, the absence of anti-viral agents, the increased geographical movement of people and goods, and genetic modification of viruses1,2. Respiratory infections represent a major cause of death and disability worldwide in both developing and developed countries3. It has been estimated that acute respiratory infections including pneumonia, influenza, enterovirus, adenovirus, and respiratory syncytial virus infections are responsible for millions of deaths every year. In addition, they have a substantial economic and social impact because of their associated high hospitalization rate, high medical costs, and losses of productivity associated with time missed from work or school. It has been estimated that the annual cost of viral respiratory tract illnesses is approximately US $40 billion in the United States1. The majority of these infections are caused by more than 200 different types of viruses that may contain RNA or DNA as genetic material. Infections related to RNA viruses are more remarkable than those caused by DNA viruses. In particular, coronaviruses represent a highly important emerging RNA virus family2.

Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)

Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) is a novel coronavirus that causes coronavirus disease (COVID-19) in humans, a respiratory infection that was first reported in Wuhan, China in December 2019. This SARS-related coronavirus is a member of the zoonotic beta-coronavirus family4,5. SARS-CoV-2 is an enveloped virus with a single-stranded positive sense RNA genome6. Coronaviruses are named for their crown-like shapes associated with their long surface spikes7. Coronaviruses are hosted by humans and several other vertebrate reservoirs such as camels, bats, masked palm civets, mice, dogs, and cats8,9. It has been suggested that COVID-19 was initially hosted by bats and then transmitted to humans via wild animals; however, the subsequent spread of the virus occurred through human-to-human transmission7.

Coronaviruses may cause respiratory, gastrointestinal (GI), and neurologic disorders8. Most of the identified coronaviruses cause mild human disease excluding SARS-CoV-1 and Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus (MERS-CoV), which are highly pathogenic viruses associated with severe infections and fatalities9,10. SARS-CoV-1 appeared in 2002 in China, whereas MERS-CoV was identified in 2012 in Saudi Arabia4,8. Although SARS-CoV-2 is more transmissible than MERS-CoV and SARS-CoV-1, it has lower fatality rates than either virus8. COVID-19 is highly pathogenic, and the number of affected patients has drastically increased globally. Therefore, COVID-19 was declared pandemic by WHO, which confirmed at least 32.5 million cases and more than 986.000 deaths through September 26, 202010.

The incubation period for COVID-19 is 1–14 days10. The clinical manifestations of COVID-19 are variable, ranging from asymptomatic to severe illness. Asymptomatic patients can serve as sources of disease dissemination5,8. Common symptoms of COVID-19 include fever, dry cough, shortness of breath, myalgia, and fatigue. Headache, rhinorrhea, sneezing, sore throat, loss of odor and pneumonia are other reported symptoms of COVID-198. Other uncommon manifestations of the disease include gastrointestinal symptoms such as diarrhea, nausea, vomiting, and abdominal pain7,8.

The majority of cases are self-limiting and result in complete recovery5. Conversely, SARS-CoV-2 can cause severe infections and result in septic shock, acute respiratory distress syndrome, acute cardiac injury, acute kidney injury, and multi-organ failure, which necessitate intensive care unit admission. Extremely severe cases of COVID-19 can lead to death5,7,8. Adults and children usually develop mild self-limiting disease. Meanwhile, more severe COVID-19 can occur in elderly people with underlying medical conditions such as cardiovascular diseases and diabetes5. Pregnant women usually develop a disease status similar to that in non-pregnant adult patients. Although COVID-19 was initially considered uncommon in children11, increasing numbers of pediatric cases have been reported worldwide, suggesting that children have the same susceptibility to COVID-19 as adults but exhibit mild or asymptomatic disease12.

A history of contact with infected patients within 2 weeks should raise the suspicion of COVID-19 infection7. Real-time reverse-transcription–polymerase-chain-reaction is the gold standard diagnostic tool for COVID-19. Moreover, chest computed tomography is another modality supporting the clinical diagnosis of COVID-197.

COVID-19 is mainly transmitted from person-to-person via sneeze- or cough-induced respiratory droplets from the mouths or noses of infected persons5,8. Disease transmission through the eyes has also been suggested. Contact with surfaces contaminated by the virus is another mode of COVID-19 transmission4,9. Recently, SARS-CoV-2 was detected in stools, suggesting the possibility of fecal–oral transmission13. This was later confirmed in some cases in the US and China which indicated that SARS-CoV-2 can multiply in both respiratory and digestive tracts14. Furthermore, the fecal samples of some infected patients were found positive for the RNA of SARS-CoV-2 after their respiratory samples became negative for the viral RNA15. It seems that COVID-19 infection negatively affect the anatomy and physiology of the GI tract for a long period and thus, attacking the gut microbiota16,17. Nowadays, a solid body of available evidence confirmed that the gut microbial community of COVID-19 patients had been changed. It was obvious that growth of opportunistic pathogens and reduction of beneficial bacteria in gut microbiota positively correlated with the severity of COVID-19 infections18,19.

Gut microbiota

Vaccines are promising treatments for preventing viral infectious disease; however, their efficacy can be limited by mutations in RNA viruses, as observed for the influenza virus as a representative pathogenic virus20,21. This increases the risk of infection, making these viruses serious threats to public health because of recurrent widespread outbreaks.

The microbial communities (bacteria, fungi, archaea, viruses, and protozoa) in the human GI tract, lungs, skin, and mouth exist in a commensal relationship with host cells, thereby playing a major role in human health22,23. The commensal bacteria (1 × 1013 CFU) that are present in the GI tract are equivalent to the number of human cells24. This colonization starts shortly after birth and their profiles and numbers stabilize by the age of 1 year with more than 1000 bacterial species25,26. The GI microbiota has the ability to interact with human cells, including specific immune cells. These interactions produce different health benefits in the host including regulating GI motility; activating and destroying toxins, genotoxins, and mutagens; transforming bile acid and steroids; producing vitamins; absorbing minerals; metabolizing xenobiotic substances; influencing intestinal permeability and barrier functions; and modulating mucosal and systemic immunity; as well as beneficial effects on the skin and upper respiratory tract26,27.

Recently, the presence of beneficial microbes was reported in the upper (nasal cavity, nasopharynx, oropharynx, and larynx above the vocal cords) and lower respiratory tracts (larynx below the vocal cords, trachea, bronchi, and bronchioles and alveoli of the lungs) of both healthy people and those with pulmonary diseases such as cystic fibrosis and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease20,28. The microbiota populated the lungs mostly via the upper respiratory tract or diffusion along the mucosal surface28,29.

These beneficial microorganisms compete with pathogens concerning the colonization of human cells in different organs to promote host health. This requires high numbers of beneficial microorganisms, and any imbalance or disruption of this system may cause dysbiosis, which can allow pathogens to cause diseases such as respiratory tract infections20,22. Dysbiosis can also be caused by long-term antibiotic use. Therefore, probiotics are also usually recommended for patients who have recently used antibiotics for treating any disease. Other causes of dysbiosis in the human GI tract include exposure to toxins, stress, disease, insufficient diet, and age26.

Gut-lung axis and COVID-19

The gastrointestinal tract and lung are among the body compartments that host microbiota; however, the lung has a small number of microbiota when compared to that of the gut30. There is accumulating evidence that bidirectional communications exist between gut and lung, which is called the gut-lung axis. This bidirectional crosstalk is involved in the support of immune homeostasis31. It is believed that the gastrointestinal inflammation results in lung inflammation through this connection32. The exact mechanism underlying this inflammatory shift from the gut to the lung is not yet completely revealed; however, dysbiosis of gut and lung microbiota is one of the implicated factors in this event. It has been shown previously that dysbiosis of gut microbiota is linked with several respiratory pathological conditions32,33, and shifts in the composition of the lung microbiota toward the gut microbiota have been observed in several respiratory disorders30,34. One of the suggested mechanisms behind the bidirectional interaction between lung and gut microbiota systems is that increased permeability of the GI tract allows the leakage and migration of the gut microbiota to the lung, modulating its microbiota and thus its immune responses30. Furthermore, gut microbial components and metabolites like lipopolysaccharides (LPS) and short-chain fatty acids (SCFA), respectively, are also involved in this gut-lung bidirectional communication. Additionally, blood- or lymphatic-mediated circulation of immune cells or inflammatory mediators from the GI tract to the lung results can in lung inflammatory responses30,35.

In addition to the most frequently described respiratory symptoms such as fever, cough and severe respiratory syndrome caused by COVID-19 infection, it has also been reported that patients exhibited GI symptoms including diarrhea, vomiting, nausea, loss of appetite, GI bleeding, and abdominal pain36. It was found that COVID-19 patients with GI symptoms such as diarrhea experienced more severe respiratory disorders than those without GI symptoms37. Although the impact of the gut on lung health is well established, the available knowledge about the opposite role of the lung on the gut health is still scarce. Therefore, it is unknown why would COVID-19 influence the GI tract integrity. Dysbiosis is potentially one of the contributing mechanisms. Little knowledge is available about the effect of lung microbiome on the gut one. Acute lung injury mediated-lung dysbiosis was associated with blood-mediated modulation of the gut microbiota38,39, and the gut microbiota population is modulated in cases of pulmonary allergy40. As a result, COVID-19 may induce lung microbiota disruption that modulates the GI tract microbiota, resulting in GI tract symptoms.

Furthermore, studies revealed that the GI symptoms generated in patients infected with COVID1-9 might be attributed to the damaged tissues and organs caused by the immune responses41. Alternatively, angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (ACE2) is the main host cell receptor of COVID-1942,43. ACE-I and ACE-II are crucial enzymes that play a significant role in regulating blood pressure via the biochemical renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system (RAAS) pathway44. Besides the lung, ACE2 is also expressed by the intestines, and direct colonization of the gut ACE2 receptors through the ingestion of the virus is potentially responsible for the gastrointestinal tract symptoms associated with COVID-19. Instead of that, dysfunction of apoptosis pathways in the intestine due to respiratory infections45 is another proposed explanation for COVID-19-associated GI tract symptoms. Additionally, it is still likely COVID-19-related GI tract symptoms might result due to the fact that GI tract and respiratory tracts share the same embryonic origin, and thus they are structurally alike and interact similarly in physiological and pathological conditions46. All these suggested mechanisms can work individually or collectively to induce GI tract disturbances associated with COVID-19.

To date, no vaccine has been developed for COVID-19, nor is any curative therapy available. Most available treatments aim to alleviate symptoms, and mechanical ventilation is used in cases of severe disease. Some anti-viral, anti-inflammatory and anti-malarial drugs have been applied to treat COVID-19; however, none of these medications have been approved as effective curative treatments against COVID-198. Therefore, other safe strategies such as probiotics and prebiotics could be applied to prevent or treat COVID-19.

Probiotics and prebiotics

Probiotics are live microorganisms that confer a beneficial physiological effect on the host when administered at adequate amounts. Some lactic acid bacteria that can be found in different fermented foods such as yogurt, cheese, and pickles are generally recognized as safe and classified as probiotics because of their health benefits47. It was suggested that probiotics should be consumed daily at doses of 108 to 1010 CFU to produce health benefits in humans. The approved health benefits include reducing symptoms of lactose intolerance by improving lactose digestion, inhibiting the initiation of allergic diseases, maintaining intestinal pH, preventing or treating ischemic heart syndromes, reducing blood cholesterol levels, producing vitamins B, improving the bioavailability of dietary calcium, and boosting immune activity. Meanwhile, other potential health benefits such as the treatment of acute diarrheal diseases and prevention of cancer and tooth decay require additional research for validation22.

Probiotics include bacteria such as Lactobacillus acidophilus, L. amylovorus, L. brevis, L. bulgaricus, L. casei, L. cellobiosus, L. crispatus, L. curvatus, L. delbrueckii spp. bulgaris, L. fermentum, L. gallinarum, L. helveticus, L. johnsonii, L. lactis, L. paracasei, L. plantarum, L. reuteri, L. rhamnosus; Streptococcus thermophilus, Lactococcus lactis, Leuconostoc mesenteroides, Pediococcus pentosaceus, P. acidilactici, Bifidobacterium adolescentis, B. animalis, B. bifidum, B. breve, B. essensis, B. infantis, B. laterosporum, B. thermophilum, B. longum, Propionibacterium acidipropionici, P. freudenreichii, P. jensenii, P. thoenii, Enterococcus fecalis, E. faecium, Bacillus alcolophilus, B. cereus, B. clausii, B. coagulans, B. subtilis, Escherichia coli, Sporolactobacillus inulinus; as well as yeast such as Saccharomyces boulardii and S. cerevisiae48,49,50. Probiotics have been proposed as antimicrobial agents against a large number of pathogenic and spoilage bacteria. However direct and indirect anti-viral activity was recently reported for some probiotic strains51.

Prebiotics were initially defined as “non-digestible food ingredients that beneficially affects the host by selectively stimulating the growth and/or activity of one or a limited number of bacteria already residing in the colon”52. The prebiotics definition has been modified several times and finally it was proposed as ‘substrates that are selectively utilized by host microorganisms conferring a health benefit’53. Similar to probiotics, prebiotics can be delivered into microbially colonized body sites by oral administration to reach the intestines, or by a direct way to the vaginal tract and skin53. Prebiotics include fructans, oligosaccharides, arabinooligosaccharides, isomaltooligosaccharides, xylooligosaccharides, resistant starch, lactosucrose, lactobionic acid, galactomannan, psyllium, polyphenols and polyunsaturated fatty acids53,54,55. The health benefits of prebiotics to the GI tract including inhibition of pathogens and stimulation of immune system are due to their ability to modulate the composition and activity of human microbiota55. However, to date, there is no information directly linking prebiotics to COVID-19 infections in any way, although a indirect effect may be hypothesized.

Probiotics and immune modulation

Probiotic bacteria have been shown to have a number of beneficial immune and health effects. They not only enhance the bioavailability of nutrients and moderate health, they are also involved in regulating the bacterial ecosystem and module immune cells56.

Dendritic cells (DC) play a key role in immune homeostasis in the healthy intestine. DCs are key antigen presenting cells which take up antigens (i.e. viral, cancer) and present small antigenic peptides on their surface to prime T cells towards pro-inflammatory (Th1) or anti-inflammatory (Th2) phenotypes. DC in an immature state can lead to deletion of T cells or stimulation of regulatory T cells57. The gut microbiota are able to drive DC to prime these cells. In fact, L. reuteri and L. casei, stimulate IFN-gamma production, and activate pro-inflammatory Th1 cells58. Likewise, oral administration of B. infantis in mice stimulate DCs which suppress Th2-biased responses59 and stimulate Th1 pro-inflammatory responses which is required for virus elimination.

Monocytes are present in the peripheral blood which are amongst the first cells to be in contact with bacteria and viruses. They differentiate to tissue macrophages, where intestinal microbiota or ingested probiotics interact with them to secrete a number of cytokines. The pro-inflammatory cytokine, IL-12 is secreted by macrophages which stimulate natural killer cells and CD4+ Th1 cells to secrete IFN-gamma which are required for elimination of viruses60. In addition, probiotics L. gasseri, L. delbrueckii ssp. bulgaricus, B. bifidum, L. acidophilus strains induce IFN-alpha production by monocytes60. The probiotic L. paracasei DG increases TNF-alpha, IL-6, IL-8 of human monocyte cell line, THP-161. Similarly, it was recently noted that S. thermophilus induced TNF-alpha, IL-6, IL-8 profile which is required for anti-viral effects62,63,64.

NK cells are important in the early immune response against viral infections, in particular through clearance of virus-infected cells. Lactobacillus probiotic strains are able to stimulate DCs to secrete IL-12, which in turn activates NK cells to secrete IFN-gamma, an essential cytokine for lung bacterial (S. aureus) and viral elimination58,65.

Probiotics such as L. casei can also interact with Toll-like receptors (TLR) on the epithelial cells, thereby, enhancing the production of cytokines that play a major role in improving the epithelial cells productivity and preventing their apoptosis which enhances their survival and proliferation during restoration66,67. Understanding the immune cell activation, cytokine profiles and immune modulation is crucial providing a clear path for managing viral infections.

Probiotics and respiratory tract infections

Vaccines, antibiotics, and anti-viral medications have been regularly used for the prevention and treatment of bacterial or viral infectious diseases; however, the control of most infections has not yet been fully achieved. Antimicrobial resistance is progressively emerging among many pathogenic bacteria, viruses, parasites, and fungi21,68. Antibiotics are not recommended for treating viral infections because of their inactivity against viruses and disruption of the normal human microbiota. Therefore, other approaches have been developed for the treatment and prevention of bacterial or viral respiratory tract infections. These modalities include bacteriophages, antimicrobial peptides, and probiotics51. Probiotics exhibit potent antimicrobial activity against several pathogens. In the past two decades, probiotics have been proposed as antimicrobial agents against viruses causing respiratory tract infections51. There are different possible mechanisms of action supporting the activities of probiotics against respiratory viruses; however, the most probable mechanisms are modulation of the innate immune system and enhancement of acquired immune responses1. Based on previous studies of different viral infections, it is evident that the prevention of infectious diseases can be achieved by boosting and stimulating human immune activity through the consumption of healthy, balanced diets and the use of administrative supplements such as vitamins, minerals, fiber, and probiotics51.

Several studies have shown that probiotics are useful for preventing or treating respiratory tract infections caused by viruses such as influenza and syncytial viruses through enhancing the immunity of individuals via activating immunoglobulin A (IgA) secretion and boosting the activity of Peyer’s plaques, neutrophils, macrophages, natural killer cells, mesenteric lymph nodes, and intraepithelial lymphocytes26,69. Oral probiotic strains have been used to prevent or treat infections caused by influenza A, influenza H1N1, and respiratory syncytial viruses by minimizing the infectious symptoms, shortening the duration of infection, reducing the virus levels in the lungs or nasal washings, producing anti-viral components, promoting immune activity, and enhancing health by reducing body weight loss during infection70,71,72,73. Probiotic supplements containing L. paracasei, L. casei, and L. fermentum significantly reduced the incidence of influenza-like symptoms and upper respiratory infection in adults, who commonly experience colds ≥4 times per year. Treated adults exhibited significantly higher interferon (IFN)-γ levels in serum and higher soluble IgA levels in the GI tract than untreated adults or their own baseline results74.

In addition to oral probiotic administration, intranasal administration using nasal sprays and aerosolized formulations is considered an effective and non-invasive approach for distributing probiotics into cells in the lungs to modulate the microbiota and treat or prevent several viral infections75,76,77,78. Several probiotics species including B. breve, L. pentosus, L. casei, L. plantarum, L. rhamnosus, L. delbrueckii ssp. bulgaricus, L. gasseri, L. reuteri, L. lactis, and L. brevis have been intranasally or orally administrated1,69.

Harata et al.79 found that the intranasal administration of L. rhamnosus in mice infected with influenza H1N1 virus resulted in significantly diminished symptoms and higher survival rates than observed in control mice. They also reported that treated mice exhibited higher cytotoxic activity in the lungs, elevated mRNA expression of interleukin, tumor necrosis factor, and monocyte chemotactic protein. Marchisio et al.80 noted that the intranasal administration of S. salivarius effectively treated acute otitis media in children aged 1–5 years. Nasal administration of different strains of L. rhamnosus in mice conferred a protective effect against influenza and respiratory syncytial virus infection81,82. Kawase et al.83 reported that the oral administration of L. gasseri in mice infected with the influenza H1N1 virus significantly ameliorated clinical symptoms, reduced the viral load, and increased the mRNA expression of interleukins and IFNs. Youn et al.84 found that influenza virus-infected mice that were intranasally administered Lactobacillus species had higher survival rates than untreated mice.

Probiotics, prebiotics, and COVID-19

The directly or indirectly positive impact of probiotics on the ACE enzymes is well stated85. During food fermentation, probiotics produce bioactive peptides with the capability to inhibit the ACE enzymes by blocking the active sites86,87. Moreover, the debris of the dead probiotic cells acted also as ACE inhibitors88. These findings suggest that probiotics could be a potential blocker to the ACE receptor that acts as a gateway for SARS-CoV-2 to attack GI cells. The concept of using drugs to block the ACE receptors as a treatment approach against COVID-19 was proposed by Fernández-Fernández89, despite the otherwise opinion expressed by Esler and Esler90. Imai et al.91 have stated a positive influence of using an ACE blocker to reduce respiratory distress syndrome.

Prebiotics may also have an excellent potential effect against COVID-19 by enhancing probiotics growth and survivability. Furthermore, prebiotics could have a direct effect on GI symptoms caused by COVID-19 via blocking the ACE enzymes. Yeh et al.92 systematically reviewed 12 studies that investigated the impact of prebiotic and probiotic supplementation on influenza infection. The authors concluded that the supplementation of probiotics and prebiotics could improve hemagglutination inhibition antibody titers following the influenza vaccination.

SARS-CoV-2 is a newly emerging virus that currently lacks curative treatments and vaccines. To date, no study has reported the use of prebiotics and probiotics to treat or prevent COVID-19, but the use of probiotics in the clinical treatment or prevention of COVID-19 could be a suitable strategy. So far, several registered trials that aim to investigate the efficiency of probiotics in treating COVID-19 patients are ongoing93. Some patients with COVID-19 exhibited intestinal microbial dysbiosis characterized by low numbers of different probiotic species such as Bifidobacterium and Lactobacillus. This is could be an indicator of their weak immunity, and therefore, it has been suggested that these patients require nutritional support and prebiotic or probiotic supplementation to re-normalize the intestinal flora balance and decrease the risk of infection94. COVID-19 is a novel disease, and humans have not acquired immunity against this disease. Meanwhile, the dietary pattern of patients is an essential factor for GI microbiota levels, diversity, structure, and function. Therefore, balanced diets including probiotics-containing foods and immunity-enhancing micronutrients such as polyphenols; vitamins A, C, and D; and minerals (mainly selenium and zinc) may alleviate the risk of COVID-19 infection95. Food sources of probiotics such as fermented products have a good potential to prevent COVID-19. In previous research, the consumption of fermented milk containing probiotic strains significantly reduced the incidence of upper respiratory tract infections among healthy infants, children, adults, and the elderly96,97,98,99.

Apparently, probiotic supplementation may be a suitable strategy given prior reports of the potential application of probiotics for preventing and treating several viral infections. These observations support the administration of probiotics to patients with COVID-19 despite the absence of solid evidence supporting that these treatments can prevent or treat this infectious disease. However, boosting the natural immunity of the population using probiotics before, during, or after COVID-19 infection is rational.

Previous studies used large numbers of probiotic species and strains, and their immunomodulatory effects were strain-specific100. For example, Youn et al.84 reported that the protective effects against influenza virus infection significantly varied among Lactobacillus strains. Therefore, the effective strains of probiotics should be selected on the basis of animal and human studies.

Concerning the required quantity of probiotics, they must be consumed in sufficient quantities (>7 log CFU) to have protective and curative effects against respiratory tract infections including COVID-19. Microencapsulation should be used to protect probiotics against harsh conditions to permit their accumulation at attachment sites in the intestine at sufficient levels. Other factors associated with the beneficial effects of probiotics in preventing or treating diseases such as COVID-19 including the time of administration in the context of disease, the probiotics dose, treatment duration, and the health and microbiota status of the host. Clinical trials considering these factors should be launched in the near future.

It has been demonstrated that the numbers and biodiversity of GI microbes usually decreases with age and antibiotics therapy. This dysbiosis has been remarkably linked to several infectious, metabolic, or inflammatory diseases and conditions such as malnutrition, colon cancer, obesity, diabetes, and atherosclerosis101. Patients with disordered microbiota and the elderly are the most susceptible to COVID-19. Therefore, probiotics supplementation in those groups could likely improve the ability of the GI microbiota to modulate immune activity and thus prevent viral infections including COVID-19.

In a meta-analysis of 52 published studies that investigated the ability of probiotics to prevent or treat several disorder conditions, the strongest evidence concerning the efficiency of probiotics was observed for five diseases including acute respiratory tract infections102. In another meta-analysis, King et al.103 evaluated 17 randomized controlled trials that assessed the preventive effects of probiotics against acute lower digestive tract infections, acute respiratory tract infections, or acute otitis media in infants and/or children. Probiotics comprising single or combinations of Lactobacillus and Bifidobacterium strains were delivered to the target sample via food or supplements for 4 days to 9 months. Children who were treated with probiotics had a lower risk of requiring antibiotic prescriptions than untreated children. Therefore, probiotics may reduce the risk of common acute infections and thus reduce antibiotic use in infants and children. Further, the effects of probiotics on respiratory tract infections were investigated in a meta-analysis of 23 randomized controlled trials involving 6269 children. The results illustrated that probiotic consumption significantly reduced the severity of symptoms of infected children and the duration of infection104.

Research is needed to determine the accurate mechanisms of action of probiotics against coronaviruses including SARS-CoV-2 in healthy or infected animal models. These studies may lead to a better understanding of the bacterial dynamics in the GI tract.

Animal or human studies could be used to assess the direct effects of intranasal probiotics through targeting pathogens in the lungs and indirect effect occurring through the modulation of immune activity. These studies may be helpful for treating viral infections such as COVID-19.

To date, the health effects of probiotics have been attributed to various activities including their ability to support intestinal integrity and maintain intestinal permeability, competition with pathogens for nutrients and attachment sites, the regulation of immune cell activity against invading pathogens, and the prevention of excessive immune responses and inflammation100. Further studies are needed to examine the activity of probiotics against different coronaviruses such SARS-CoV-1, SARS-CoV-2, and MERS-CoV to fully understand their underlying mechanisms against viruses. Studies are also required to determine any adverse effects of probiotic supplementation.

Conclusions

Probiotics are live microorganisms that confer health benefits when consumed in adequate amounts, including enhanced immune activity and the clearance of respiratory tract infections. It is evident that probiotics can reduce the incidence and severity of diseases, suggesting their promise for treating or preventing COVID-19. Probiotics could help prevent COVID-19 by maintaining the human GI or lung microbiota because dysbiosis plays a major role in the susceptibility of people to infectious diseases. In vitro and clinical studies are required to examine the potential preventive and curative effects of probiotics against SARS-CoV-2 infection.

Data availability

The authors confirm that all data are available within the article.

References

  1. 1.

    Lehtoranta, L., Pitkäranta, A. & Korpela, R. Probiotics in respiratory virus infections. Eur. J. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 33, 1289–1302 (2014).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Zolnikova, O., Komkova, I., Potskherashvili, N., Trukhmanov, A. & Ivashkin, V. Application of probiotics for acute respiratory tract infections. Ital. J. Med. 12, 32–38 (2018).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    European Respiratory Society. The Global Impact of Respiratory Disease. 2nd edn. (Forum of International Respiratory Societies, 2017).

  4. 4.

    Rodriguez-Morales, A. J. et al. Clinical, laboratory and imaging features of COVID-19: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Travel Med. Infect. Dis. 34, 101623, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tmaid.2020.101623 (2020).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Xie, M. & Chen, Q. Insight into 2019 novel coronavirus—an updated intrim review and lessons from SARS-CoV and MERS-CoV. Int. J. Infect. Dis. 94, 119–124 (2020).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Zhu, N. et al. A novel coronavirus from patients with pneumonia in China, 2019. N. Engl. J. Med. 382, 727–733 (2020).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Zu, Z. Y. et al. Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19): a perspective from China. Radiology 296, E15–E25 (2020).

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Jiang, F. et al. Review of the clinical characteristics of Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19). J. Gen. Intern. Med. 35, 1545–1549 (2020).

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Lu, C.-W., Liu, X.-F. & Jia, Z.-F. 2019-nCoV transmission through the ocular surface must not be ignored. Lancet 395, e39, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30313-5 (2020).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    World Health Organization (WHO). Coronavirus disease (COVID-19) Pandemic. https://www.who.int/emergencies/diseases/novel-coronavirus-2019 (2020).

  11. 11.

    Lee, P. I., Hu, Y. L., Chen, P. Y., Huang, Y. C. & Hsueh, P. R. Are children less susceptible to COVID-19? J. Microbiol. Immunol. Infect. 53, 371–372 (2020).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Zimmerman, P. & Curtis, N. Coronavirus infections in children including COVID-19: an overview of the epidemiology, clinical features, diagnosis, treatment and prevention options in children. Pediatr. Infect. Dis. J. 39, 355–368 (2020).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Guan, W. et al. Clinical characteristics of Coronavirus Disease 2019 in China. N. Engl. J. Med. 382, 1708–1720 (2020).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Holshue, M. L. et al. First case of 2019 novel coronavirus in the United States. N. Engl. J. Med. 382, 929–936 (2020).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Wu, Y. et al. Prolonged presence of SARS-CoV-2 viral RNA in faecal samples. Lancet Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 5, 434–435 (2020).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Xiao, F. et al. Evidence for gastrointestinal infection of SARS-CoV-2. Gastroenterol 158, 1831–1833 (2020).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Kopel, J., Perisetti, A., Gajendran, M., Boregowda, U. & Goyal, H. Clinical insights into the gastrointestinal manifestations of COVID-19. Dig. Dis. Sci. 65, 1932–1939 (2020).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Zuo, T. et al. Alterations in gut microbiota of patients with COVID-19 during time of hospitalization. Gastroenterol. https://doi.org/10.1053/j.gastro.2020.05.048 (2020).

  19. 19.

    Tang, L. et al. Clinical significance of the correlation between changes in the major intestinal bacteria species and COVID-19 severity. Engineering. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eng.2020.05.013 (2020).

  20. 20.

    Barcik, W., Boutin, R. C. T., Sokolowska, M. & Finlay, B. B. The role of lung and gut microbiota in the pathology of asthma. Immunity 52, 241–255 (2020).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Chehrazi, N., Cipriano, L. E. & Enns, E. A. Dynamics of drug resistance: optimal control of an infectious disease. Oper. Res. 67, 619–650 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Bustamante, M. et al. Probiotics and prebiotics potential for the care of skin, female urogenital tract, and respiratory tract. Folia Microbiol. (Praha). 65, 245–264 (2020).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Hauptmann, M. & Schaible, U. E. Linking microbiota and respiratory disease. FEBS Lett. 590, 3721–3738 (2016).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Sender, R., Fuchs, S. & Milo, R. Revised estimates for the number of human and bacteria cells in the body. PLoS Biol. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.1002533 (2016).

  25. 25.

    Rajilić-Stojanović, M. & de Vos, W. M. The first 1000 cultured species of the human gastrointestinal microbiota. FEMS Microbiol. Rev. 38, 996–1047 (2014).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Zhang, Y. J. et al. Impacts of gut bacteria on human health and diseases. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 16, 7493–7519 (2015).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Davison, G., Kehaya, C. & Wyn Jones, A. Nutritional and physical activity interventions to improve immunity. Am. J. Lifestyle Med. 10, 152–169 (2014).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Bassis, C. M. et al. Analysis of the upper respiratory tract microbiotas as the source of the lung and gastric microbiotas in healthy individuals. MBio. https://doi.org/10.1128/mBio.00037-15 (2015).

  29. 29.

    Dickson, R. P. et al. Bacterial topography of the healthy human lower respiratory tract. MBio. https://doi.org/10.1128/mBio.02287-16 (2017).

  30. 30.

    Fanos, V., Pintus, M. C., Pintus, R. & Marcialis, M. A. Lung microbiota in the acute respiratory disease: from coronavirus to metabolomics. J. Pediatr. Neonat. Individ. Med. 9, e090139, https://doi.org/10.7363/090139 (2020).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Dang, A. T. & Marsland, B. J. Microbes, metabolites, and the gut–lung axis. Mucos. Immunol. 12, 843–850 (2019).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Hufnagl, K., Pali-Schöll, I., Roth-Walter, F. & Jensen-Jarolim, E. Dysbiosis of the gut and lung microbiome has a role in asthma. Semin. Immunopathol. 42, 75–93 (2020).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Wang, H. et al. Gut-lung crosstalk in pulmonary involvement with inflammatory bowel diseases. World J. Gastroenterol. 19, 6794–6804 (2013).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    Mukherjee, S. & Hanidziar, D. More of the gut in the lung: how two microbiomes meet in ARDS. Yale J. Biol. Med. 91, 143–149 (2018).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    Otani, S. & Coopersmith, C. M. Gut integrity in critical illness. J. Intens. Care 7, 17. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40560-019-0372-6 (2019).

  36. 36.

    Smyk, W. et al. COVID-19: focus on the lungs but do not forget the gastrointestinal tract. Eur. J. Clin. Invest. 50, e13276, https://doi.org/10.1111/eci.13276 (2020).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  37. 37.

    Wan, Y. et al. Enteric involvement in hospitalised patients with COVID-19 outside Wuhan. Lancet Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 5, 534–535 (2020).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  38. 38.

    Sze, M. A. et al. Changes in the bacterial microbiota in gut, blood, and lungs following acute LPS instillation into mice lungs. PLoS ONE 9, e111228, https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0111228 (2014).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  39. 39.

    He, Y. et al. Gut–lung axis: the microbial contributions and clinical implications. Crit. Rev. Microbiol. 43, 81–95 (2017).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  40. 40.

    Vital, M., Harkema, J. R., Rizzo, M., Tiedje, J. & Brandenberger, C. Alterations of the murine gut microbiome with age and allergic airway disease. J. Immunol. Res. 2015, 892568 (2015).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  41. 41.

    Tian, Y., Rong, L., Nian, W. & He, Y. Review article: gastrointestinal features in COVID-19 and the possibility of faecal transmission. Aliment. Pharmacol. Ther. 51, 843–851 (2020).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  42. 42.

    Suresh Kumar, V. C. et al. Novelty in the gut: a systematic review and meta-analysis of the gastrointestinal manifestations of COVID-19. BMJ Open Gastroenterol. 7, e000417 (2020).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  43. 43.

    Ciaglia, E., Vecchione, C. & Puca, A. A. COVID-19 infection and circulating ace2 levels: protective role in women and children. Front. Pediatr. 8, 206 (2020).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  44. 44.

    Te Riet, L., Van Esch, J. H. M., Roks, A. J. M., Van Den Meiracker, A. H. & Danser, A. H. J. Hypertension: renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system alterations. Circ. Res. 116, 960–975 (2015).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  45. 45.

    Perrone, E. E. et al. Mechanisms of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus pneumonia-induced intestinal epithelial apoptosis. Shock 38, 68–75 (2012).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  46. 46.

    Budden, K. F. et al. Emerging pathogenic links between microbiota and the gut-lung axis. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 15, 55–63 (2017).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  47. 47.

    FAO/WHO. Guidelines for the Evaluation of Probiotics in Food. https://www.who.int/foodsafety/fs_management/en/probiotic_guidelines.pdf (2002).

  48. 48.

    Bron, P. A., Van Baarlen, P. & Kleerebezem, M. Emerging molecular insights into the interaction between probiotics and the host intestinal mucosa. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 10, 66–78 (2012).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  49. 49.

    Saad, N., Delattre, C., Urdaci, M., Schmitter, J. M. & Bressollier, P. An overview of the last advances in probiotic and prebiotic field. LWT Food Sci. Technol. 50, 1–16 (2013).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  50. 50.

    Santosa, S., Farnworth, E. & Jones, P. J. H. Probiotics and their potential health claims. Nutr. Rev. 64, 265–274 (2006).

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  51. 51.

    Al Kassaa, I. New Insights on Antiviral Probiotics: From Research to Applications (Springer, 2016).

  52. 52.

    Gibson, G. R. & Roberfroid, M. B. Dietary modulation of the human colonic microbiota: introducing the concept of prebiotics. J. Nutr. 125, 1401–1412 (1995).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  53. 53.

    Gibson, G. R. et al. The international scientific association and scope of prebiotics. Nat. Rev. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 14, 491–502 (2017).

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  54. 54.

    Guarino, M. P. L. et al. Mechanisms of action of prebiotics and their effects on gastro-intestinal disorders in adults. Nutrients 12, 1037 (2020).

    CAS  PubMed Central  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. 55.

    Davani-Davari, D. et al. Prebiotics: definition, types, sources, mechanisms, and clinical applications. Foods 8, 92 (2019).

    CAS  PubMed Central  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. 56.

    Dargahi, N., Johnson, J., Donkor, O., Vasiljevic, T. & Apostolopoulos, V. Immunomodulatory effects of probiotics: can they be used to treat allergies and autoimmune diseases? Maturitas 119, 25–38 (2019).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  57. 57.

    Foligne, B. et al. A key role of dendritic cells in probiotic functionality. PLoS ONE 2, e313, https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0000313 (2007).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  58. 58.

    De Roock, S. et al. Gut derived lactic acid bacteria induce strain specific CD4 + T cell responses in human PBMC. Clin. Nutr. 30, 845–851 (2011).

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  59. 59.

    Fu, L., Song, J., Wang, C., Fu, S. & Wang, Y. Bifidobacterium infantis potentially alleviates shrimp tropomyosin-induced allergy by tolerogenic dendritic cell-dependent induction of regulatory T cells and alterations in gut microbiota. Front. Immunol. 8, 1536, https://doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2017.01536 (2017).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  60. 60.

    Kitazawa, H. et al. Expression of mRNA encoding IFNα in macrophages stimulated with Lactobacillus gasseri. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 120, 315–321 (1994).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  61. 61.

    Balzaretti, S. et al. A novel rhamnose-rich hetero-exopolysaccharide isolated from Lactobacillus paracasei DG activates THP-1 human monocytic cells. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 83, e02702–e02716 (2017).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  62. 62.

    Dargahi, N., Johnson, J. & Apostolopoulos, V. Streptococcus thermophilus alters the expression of genes associated with innate and adaptive immunity in human peripheral blood mononuclear cells. PLoS ONE 15, e0228531, https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0228531 (2020).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  63. 63.

    Dargahi, N., Johnson, J., Donkor, O., Vasiljevic, T. & Apostolopoulos, V. Immunomodulatory effects of Streptococcus thermophilus on U937 monocyte cell cultures. J. Funct. Foods 49, 241–249 (2018).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  64. 64.

    Dargahi, N., Matsoukas, J. & Apostolopoulos, V. Streptococcus thermophilus ST285 alters pro-inflammatory to anti-inflammatory cytokine secretion against multiple sclerosis peptide in mice. Brain Sci. 10, 126 (2020).

    CAS  PubMed Central  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  65. 65.

    Kudva, A. et al. Influenza A inhibits Th17-mediated host defense against bacterial pneumonia in mice. J. Immunol. 186, 1666–1674 (2011).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  66. 66.

    Chung, Y. W., Choi, J. H., Oh, T. Y., Eun, C. S. & Han, D. S. Lactobacillus casei prevents the development of dextran sulphate sodium-induced colitis in Toll-like receptor 4 mutant mice. Clin. Exp. Immunol. 151, 182–189 (2008).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  67. 67.

    Zendeboodi, F., Khorshidian, N., Mortazavian, A. M. & da Cruz, A. G. Probiotic: conceptualization from a new approach. Cur. Opin. Food Sci. 32, 103–123 (2020).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  68. 68.

    Olaimat, A. N. et al. Emergence of antibiotic resistance in Listeria monocytogenes isolated from food products: a comprehensive review. Compr. Rev. Food Sci. Food Saf. 17, 1277–1292 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  69. 69.

    Khan, R., Petersen, F. C. & Shekhar, S. Commensal bacteria: an emerging player in defense against respiratory pathogens. Front. Immunol. 10, 1–9 (2019).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  70. 70.

    Chiba, E. et al. Immunobiotic Lactobacillus rhamnosus improves resistance of infant mice against respiratory syncytial virus infection. Int. Immunopharmacol. 17, 373–382 (2013).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  71. 71.

    Eguchi, K., Fujitani, N., Nakagawa, H. & Miyazaki, T. Prevention of respiratory syncytial virus infection with probiotic lactic acid bacterium Lactobacillus gasseri SBT2055. Sci. Rep. 9, 1–2 (2019).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  72. 72.

    Goto, H. et al. Anti-influenza virus effects of both live and non-live Lactobacillus acidophilus L-92 accompanied by the activation of innate immunity. Br. J. Nutr. 110, 1810–1818, https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007114513001104 (2013).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  73. 73.

    Kawase, M., He, F., Kubota, A., Harata, G. & Hiramatsu, M. Oral administration of Lactobacilli from human intestinal tract protects mice against influenza virus infection. Lett. Appl. Microbiol. 51, 6–10 (2010).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  74. 74.

    Zhang, H. et al. Prospective study of probiotic supplementation results in immune stimulation and improvement of upper respiratory infection rate. Synth. Syst. Biotechnol. 3, 113–120 (2018).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  75. 75.

    Jung, Y. J. et al. Heat-killed Lactobacillus casei confers broad protection against influenza A virus primary infection and develops heterosubtypic immunity against future secondary infection. Sci. Rep. 7, 1–12 (2017).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  76. 76.

    Hori, T., Kiyoshima, J., Shida, K. & Yasui, H. Effect of Intranasal Administration of Lactobacillus casei Shirota on influenza virus infection of upper respiratory tract in mice. Clin. Diagn. Lab. Immunol. 8, 593–597 (2001).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  77. 77.

    Le Noci, V. et al. Modulation of pulmonary microbiota by antibiotic or probiotic aerosol therapy: a strategy to promote immunosurveillance against lung metastases. Cell Rep. 24, 3528–3538 (2018).

    PubMed  Article  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  78. 78.

    Park, M. K. et al. Lactobacillus plantarum DK119 as a probiotic confers protection against influenza virus by modulating innate immunity. PLoS ONE 8, 26–29 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  79. 79.

    Harata, G. et al. Intranasal administration of Lactobacillus rhamnosus GG protects mice from H1N1 influenza virus infection by regulating respiratory immune responses. Lett. Appl. Microbiol. 50, 597–602 (2010).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  80. 80.

    Marchisio, P. et al. Streptococcus salivarius 24SMB administered by nasal spray for the prevention of acute otitis media in otitis-prone children. Eur. J. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 34, 2377–2383 (2015).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  81. 81.

    Tomosada, Y. et al. Nasally administered Lactobacillus rhamnosus strains differentially modulate respiratory antiviral immune responses and induce protection against respiratory syncytial virus infection. BMC Immunol. 14, 40, https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2172-14-40 (2013).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  82. 82.

    Zelaya, H. et al. Nasal priming with immunobiotic Lactobacillus rhamnosus modulates inflammation–coagulation interactions and reduces influenza virus-associated pulmonary damage. Inflamm. Res. 64, 589–602 (2015).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  83. 83.

    Kawase, M. et al. Heat-killed Lactobacillus gasseri TMC0356 protects mice against influenza virus infection by stimulating gut and respiratory immune responses. FEMS Immunol. Med. Microbiol. 64, 280–288 (2012).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  84. 84.

    Youn, H. N. et al. Intranasal administration of live Lactobacillus species facilitates protection against influenza virus infection in mice. Antivir. Res. 93, 138–43 (2012).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  85. 85.

    Robles-Vera, I. et al. Antihypertensive effects of probiotics. Curr. Hypertens. Rep. 19, 26, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11906-017-0723-4 (2017).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  86. 86.

    Ayyash, M. M., Sherkat, F. & Shah, N. P. The effect of NaCl substitution with KCl on Akawi cheese: Chemical composition, proteolysis, angiotensin-converting enzyme-inhibitory activity, probiotic survival, texture profile, and sensory properties. J. Dairy Sci. 95, 4747–4759 (2012).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  87. 87.

    Ayyash, M., Olaimat, A., Al-Nabulsi, A. & Liu, S. Q. Bioactive properties of novel probiotic Lactococcus lactis fermented camel sausages: Cytotoxicity, angiotensin converting enzyme inhibition, antioxidant capacity, and antidiabetic activity. Food Sci. Anim. Resour. 40, 155–171 (2020).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  88. 88.

    Miremadi, F., Ayyash, M., Sherkat, F. & Stojanovska, L. Cholesterol reduction mechanisms and fatty acid composition of cellular membranes of probiotic Lactobacilli and Bifidobacteria. J. Funct. Foods 9, 295–305 (2014).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  89. 89.

    Fernández-Fernández, F. J. COVID-19, hypertension and angiotensin receptor-blocking drugs. J. Hypertens. 38, 1191 (2020).

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  90. 90.

    Esler, M. & Esler, D. Can angiotensin receptor-blocking drugs perhaps be harmful in the COVID-19 pandemic? J. Hypertens. 38, 781–782 (2020).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  91. 91.

    Imai, Y. et al. Angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 protects from severe acute lung failure. Nature 436, 112–116 (2005).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  92. 92.

    Yeh, T. L. et al. The influence of prebiotic or probiotic supplementation on antibody titers after influenza vaccination: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Drug Des. Devel. Ther. 12, 217–230 (2018).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  93. 93.

    Infusino, F. et al. Diet supplementation, probiotics, and nutraceuticals in SARS-CoV-2 infection: a scoping review. Nutrients 12, 1718, https://doi.org/10.3390/nu12061718 (2020).

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  94. 94.

    Xu, K. et al. Management of corona virus disease-19 (COVID-19): The Zhejiang experience. Zhejiang Da Xue Xue Bao. Yi Xue Ban 49, 147–157 (2020).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  95. 95.

    Gasmi, A. et al. Individual risk management strategy and potential therapeutic options for the COVID-19 pandemic. Clin. Immunol. 215, 108409, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clim.2020.108409 (2020).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  96. 96.

    Makino, S. et al. Reducing the risk of infection in the elderly by dietary intake of yoghurt fermented with Lactobacillus delbrueckii ssp. bulgaricus OLL1073R-1. Br. J. Nutr. 104, 998–1006 (2010).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  97. 97.

    Merenstein, D. et al. Use of a fermented dairy probiotic drink containing Lactobacillus casei (DN-114 001) to decrease the rate of illness in kids: the DRINK study A patient-oriented, double-blind, cluster-randomized, placebo-controlled, clinical trial. Eur. J. Clin. Nutr. 64, 669–677 (2010).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  98. 98.

    Shida, K. et al. Daily intake of fermented milk with Lactobacillus casei strain Shirota reduces the incidence and duration of upper respiratory tract infections in healthy middle-aged office workers. Eur. J. Nutr. 56, 45–53 (2017).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  99. 99.

    Taipale, T. et al. Bifidobacterium animalis subsp. lactis BB-12 in reducing the risk of infections in infancy. Br. J. Nutr. 105, 409–416 (2011).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  100. 100.

    Wu, D., Lewis, E. D., Pae, M. & Meydani, S. N. Nutritional modulation of immune function: analysis of evidence, mechanisms, and clinical relevance. Front. Immunol. 10, 1–19 (2019).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  101. 101.

    Landete, J. M. et al. Probiotic bacteria for healthier aging: immunomodulation and metabolism of phytoestrogens. Biomed. Res. Int. 2017, 5939818, https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/5939818 (2017).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  102. 102.

    Liu, Y., Tran, D. Q. & Rhoads, J. M. Probiotics in disease prevention and treatment. J. Clin. Pharmacol. 58(Suppl 10), S164–S179 (2018).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  103. 103.

    King, S. et al. Does probiotic consumption reduce antibiotic utilization for common acute infections? A systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur. J. Public Health 29, 494–499 (2019).

    PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  104. 104.

    Wang, Y. et al. Probiotics for prevention and treatment of respiratory tract infections in children: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Med. (Baltim.) 95, e4509, https://doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000004509 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank United Arab Emirates University (UAEU) for funding this article.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

A.N.O., I.A., M.A.: conception; writing—original draft; writing—review and editing. M.A.-H., M.A.G., A.A.A.-N., T.O., V.A.: writing—original draft. S.-Q.L., N.P.S.: writing—review and editing.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Amin N. Olaimat or Mutamed Ayyash.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Olaimat, A.N., Aolymat, I., Al-Holy, M. et al. The potential application of probiotics and prebiotics for the prevention and treatment of COVID-19. npj Sci Food 4, 17 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41538-020-00078-9

Download citation

Further reading

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing