Abstract
In acute skin injury, healing is impaired by the excessive release of reactive oxygen species (ROS). Melanin, an efficient scavenger of radical species in the skin, performs a key role in ROS scavenging in response to UV radiation and is upregulated in response to toxic insult. In a chemical injury model in mice, we demonstrate that the topical application of synthetic melanin particles (SMPs) significantly decreases edema, reduces eschar detachment time, and increases the rate of wound area reduction compared to vehicle controls. Furthermore, these results were replicated in a UV-injury model. Immune array analysis shows downregulated gene expression in apoptotic and inflammatory signaling pathways consistent with histological reduction in apoptosis. Mechanistically, synthetic melanin intervention increases superoxide dismutase (SOD) activity, decreases Mmp9 expression, and suppresses ERK1/2 phosphorylation. Furthermore, we observed that the application of SMPs caused increased populations of anti-inflammatory immune cells to accumulate in the skin, mirroring their decrease from splenic populations. To enhance antioxidant capacity, an engineered biomimetic High Surface Area SMP was deployed, exhibiting increased wound healing efficiency. Finally, in human skin explants, SMP intervention significantly decreased the damage caused by chemical injury. Therefore, SMPs are promising and effective candidates as topical therapies for accelerated wound healing, including via pathways validated in human skin.
Similar content being viewed by others
Introduction
Skin is the organ most exposed to external environmental damaging factors. These factors include damage from UV-light exposure, traumas and chronic wounds combined with perturbance during medical procedures. With these insults in mind, it becomes imperative to develop new therapies and to keep improving approaches that are currently available1,2. Skin wound healing is a complex process requiring a coordinated interplay of multiple cell types, growth factors and signaling molecules and our understanding of these processes will lead to advancements in how we accelerate and influence healing. Indeed, recently, significant advancements have been made in our understanding of wound repair mechanisms including the role of monocytes and macrophages3,4, the differentiation of fibroblasts and the functions of myofibroblasts5, as well as the coordination between the immune system and tissue stem cells6,7.
Oxidative stress is one of the main mechanisms underlying impaired healing in skin injury and in chronic wounds8,9. While low levels of reactive oxygen species (ROS) serve essential antimicrobial and signaling roles in wound healing10,11,12,13, excessive production of free radical species overwhelms the delicate oxidant-antioxidant homeostatic balance and leads to molecular dysfunction, cellular damage, and pathologic inflammation. This makes the redox system a natural target for wound-healing therapy14,15. Indeed, topical application of compounds with antioxidant properties such as curcumin-loaded poly (lactic acid) nanofibers16, chitosan-loaded eugenol17, and citrate-based hydrogels18 have demonstrated benefits in wound healing. However, compound biocompatibility and efficient delivery continue to pose significant challenges to their therapeutic use.
This clear clinical need led to our hypothesis that nature’s own potent antioxidant and proficient radical scavenger, melanin, could be mimicked synthetically and applied topically following skin injury, where it would be effective in healing when applied after chemical or UV-light exposure at the surface of the skin. This is based on the fact that melanin’s role as a pigment in the hair and skin19,20, is intrinsically linked to its photoprotective materials properties20,21,22. In brief, upon UV exposure, melanin expression in the skin is upregulated due to its ability to scavenge the free radicals generated by the impinging radiolytic light. Similarly, recent studies have reported increases in melanin-based skin pigmentation in response to air pollutants23.
To test this hypothesis, we synthesized two types of nanoscale Synthetic Melanin Particle (SMP) with Low and High Surface Areas (SMPLo and SMPHi, respectively)24. As a result of their higher surface area, SMPHi were expected to exhibit a superior radical scavenging capability that would be reflected in wound healing efficacy compared to SMPLo. The two types of SMPs were tested by topical application following chemical (nitrogen mustard, NM) and ultraviolet (UV)-induced skin wounds in vivo using mouse models25. In addition, SMPs were tested ex vivo using a human skin explant model for chemical-induced skin wounding. The data show that SMP treatment mitigates inflammation and accelerates wound healing by decreasing Mmp9 expression26, rescuing skin superoxide dismutase (SOD) activity27, and suppressing chemical injury-induced MAPK signaling by inhibiting ERK1/2 phosphorylation. In a critical finding, SMPs were found to modulate the immune response by increasing the number of reparative and anti-inflammatory cells in the wound area and regulating the systemic immune response. Furthermore, in human skin explants SMPLo were shown to efficiently counteract the harmful effects of NM insult. The high-surface-area particles allowed for more exposure of the wound site to the melanin material and conferred stronger wound-healing benefits observable visually and pathologically in mice, and at the molecular level compared to the low-surface-area particles with both exhibiting efficacy over vehicle controls in a model-dependent fashion. Overall, the results demonstrate that biomimetic SMPs are an effective topical intervention for the acceleration of acute chemical- and UV-wound healing.
Results
SMP syntheses and characterization
Melanin mimetics were synthesized through the oxidative polymerization of dopamine, based on previously reported methods (Fig. 1)24. The surface area and morphology of the particles were characterized using N2 sorption, dynamic light scattering, and ultraviolet-visible (UV-Vis) spectroscopy (Supplementary Fig. 1). The High-surface-area Synthetic Melanin Particles (SMPHi) had a BET area of 190 m2/g with approximately 14 and 30 Å pores while the Low-surface-area Synthetic Melanin Particles (SMPLo) were non-porous with a BET area of 20 m2/g (Supplementary Fig. 1a, b)24. We note that the surface area of SMPLo is similar to that of natural melanin which has been measured to have a BET area of 6 m2/g as previously reported for melanin extracts from Sepia officinalis—squid ink24. By dynamic light scattering (DLS), SMPHi had a hydrodynamic diameter of 220 ± 50 nm. SMPLo had a hydrodynamic diameter of 320 ± 10 nm (Supplementary Fig. 1c). These scattering data are consistent with that observed by bright field TEM (Fig. 1a, b) Additionally, SMPLo and SMPHi exhibited similar absorption spectra by UV–Vis spectroscopy (Supplementary Fig. 1d) with both particles exhibiting an absorption maximum of approximately 200 nm with a shoulder at 300 nm and a broad absorption tail. Other than porosity, the two particles had similar characteristics. Neither SMPHi nor SMPLo penetrated the stratum corneum when applied topically to skin (Fig. 1c, d).
The scavenging activity of SMPHi and SMPLo was assessed via the 2.2-diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl (DPPH) assay (Fig. 1e). SMPHi achieved higher scavenging activity at lower particle concentrations than SMPLo. The scavenging activity of both particles plateaued at approximately 100 μg, with SMPHi achieving a maximum at 90% scavenging activity and SMPLo reaching 80%. Scavenging activity was consistent across different batches of particles and was maintained but dampened over multiple use cycles (Supplementary Fig. 2). The scavenging activities of SMPs, especially SMPHi, are similar or superior to radical scavenging activities of other antioxidants as determined via the DPPH assay, such as butylated hydroxytoluene28, luteolin29, eugenol30, and ascorbic acid31.
SMP intervention improves skin healing after nitrogen mustard-induced injury
To test the hypothesis that intervention with topical SMP would improve wound healing, we utilized an NM-induced chemical injury mouse model (Fig. 2). NM is an alkylating agent that induces cell apoptosis via the formation of DNA interstrand crosslinks32. The clinical application of NM as a topical chemotherapeutic for the treatment of skin lymphoma is known to cause severe skin reactions including irritant dermatitis and blister formation33. In this experimental model, SMPs were applied topically to the NM-induced wound site 2 h after NM-induced injury to ensure that no residual NM was present on the skin surface at the time of SMP application. SMP application was then repeated at 24- and 48-h post-injury. The mice were monitored for up to 16 days.
Intervention with either type of SMP improved wound healing (Fig. 2a), evidenced by visible reduction in skin inflammation (erythema) in the early phase of tissue injury (days 1–2). SMPHi-treated animals had decreased tissue swelling reaction as measured by edema (bi-fold skin thickness) (Fig. 2b). SMP-treated skin also healed faster than control skin as evidenced by faster rates of reduction in the radial wound area (Fig. 2c) and wound depth, as measured by time to eschar detachment (Fig. 2d). SMPHi-treated animals healed more rapidly than both vehicle and SMPLo groups, with 50% of SMPHi mice demonstrating eschar detachment at 11 days post-injury compared to 30 and 0% in the SMPLo and vehicle groups, respectively. Statistical analysis showed a significant difference between SMPHi and vehicle treated groups (Fig. 2d). Skin sections were examined histologically at days 3 and 16 post-injury (Fig. 2e, f). The findings confirm decreased edema at day 3 as evidenced by epidermal thickness (Fig. 2e) as well as epidermal and dermal recovery at day 16. Here, we note the size of the healing wounds and the formation of full-thickness epidermis (Fig. 2f) in SMP-treated animals compared to vehicle control. To demonstrate the generality of the observed biological effect of SMPs, parallel experiments were conducted using a UV-radiation-induced injury model. Similarly, we observed that SMP intervention resulted in reduced skin edema and faster wound healing rates (Supplementary Fig. 3).
SMPs downregulate inflammatory and apoptosis pathways and enhance angiogenesis
To identify the pathways involved in SMP-induced wound-healing, we utilized TaqMan mouse immune arrays (Fig. 3). NM injury without SMP application led to upregulation of inflammatory genes while intervention with SMPs suppressed this upregulation, SMPHi treatment resulted in a more pronounced response than SMPLo. Specifically, following NM-induced injury, treatment with SMPHi significantly downregulated the expression of 20 genes compared to the vehicle-treated animals (Fig. 3a, Supplementary Fig. 4). Analysis of the gene expression data using the PANTHER Classification System34 identified apoptosis signaling as the major pathway affected by SMP intervention; the genes determined by the classification algorithm were Fas, Bax, Gzmb, Ikbkb, Nfkb2 and Bcl2. The other two main affected pathways were inflammation mediated by chemokine and cytokine signaling (Cxcr3, Ccr2, Ikbkb, Nfkb2) and T cell activation (Cd86, Ptrpc, Ikbkb, Nfkb2) (Fig. 3a). In the SMPLo-treatment group, the general trend was also toward downregulation of inflammation-related genes (Supplementary Fig. 4). However, because of the high variability between individual arrays, only Bcl2 demonstrated a statistically significant downregulation.
NM is reported to induce pro-inflammatory signaling through the mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) pathway35. Accordingly, we performed western blotting analysis to determine the effect of SMP treatment on extracellular signal-regulated kinase 1/2 (ERK1/2) signaling. We found that treatment with either type of SMP significantly inhibited phosphorylation of ERK 1/2 at 24 h post-injury (Fig. 3b, c and Supplementary Fig. 9a–c).
Since MAPK-pathway signaling regulates inflammatory mediators at the translational and transcriptional levels, we sought to determine if SMP treatment led to expression changes in known NM injury-associated proinflammatory mediators. We found that the expression of Mmp9 was significantly reduced by SMPHi at both 48 and 72 h after injury and by SMPLo at 72 h (Fig. 3d, e).
To confirm that SMP intervention inhibits apoptosis, we performed terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase dUTP nick end labeling (TUNEL) staining of skin samples collected from each experimental group. As expected, NM injury alone resulted in strong TUNEL-positive staining (Fig. 3f, g). TUNEL staining was significantly reduced in mice treated with either type of SMP compared to the vehicle-only group by mean fluorescence intensity (p < 0.05 for both), indicating decreased apoptosis.
Since oxidative stress and ROS are known to influence the angiogenic response, we evaluated the effect of SMP treatment on the expression of CD31, a well characterized endothelial marker. Sections of the mouse skin from various experimental groups were immunoassayed and images quantified (Fig. 3h, i). Obtained data demonstrate that treatment of the injured skin with SMPLo resulted in a significant increase in angiogenesis.
SMPs upregulate anti-inflammatory cells in the skin and decrease splenic immune cell populations
Next, we sought to examine the acute immune response provoked by NM-injury which affects the trajectory of wound healing. To investigate the effect of SMP treatment on immune activation and infiltration we performed flow cytometric analysis of wounded skin on day 3 post-injury (Fig. 4a, c; Supplementary Figs. 5, 6). As expected, the total numbers of CD45+ immune cells in the wound area were increased in all experimental groups compared to uninjured mice (Fig. 4a).
In SMP-treated animals, the total number of immune cells trended slightly lower than in the NM-injured group, although the difference was found to not be statistically significant. The levels of antigen-presenting cells, including inflammatory monocytes, non-inflammatory monocytes, macrophages, pDCs and neutrophils were similar across all experimental groups (Supplementary Fig. 7). However, a more detailed analysis revealed that SMP treatment caused an increase in the proportions of CD206hi and IL10+TGFb+ monocytes and CD206hi macrophages (Fig. 4a). The analysis of infiltrating lymphoid cells in the skin showed that while there was no difference in the total numbers of CD4+ T cells and CD4 + CD25+FoxP3+ Tregs, SMPLo intervention led to a significant increase of ST2 + PD1+ Tregs compared to the NM-injured group. This trend was also apparent in TGFb expressing Tregs (Fig. 4c).
Given the important role of the spleen in regulating the response during acute inflammation, being a reservoir of immune cells, flow cytometric analysis of splenic tissue was concurrently performed in treated animals (Fig. 4b, d). Here, we observed a significant decrease of total immune cells in the SMP-treated groups, particularly pronounced in SMPHi group. Furthermore, the difference between non-treated and NM-injured animals was much smaller and not statistically significant (Fig. 4b). This trend was confirmed in inflammatory and non-inflammatory monocytes, macrophages and neutrophils (Supplementary Fig. 7).
To a remarkable extent, the dynamics of cell populations in the skin appears to be the mirror opposite of the spleen. In the skin we observed an increase in the CD206hi population of inflammatory monocytes, non-inflammatory monocytes, and macrophages, while in the SMP-treated mice (Fig. 4a), there was a concomitant steep decrease in the corresponding populations in the spleen (Fig. 4b). Similarly, in the spleen there was a significant reduction of PD1+, ST2 + PD1+, and TGFb+ CD4+ T cells in SMP-treated mice (Fig. 4d). Excitingly, these findings indicate that the topical application of SMPs alters the skin and the chemo-attraction of immune cells from systemic responses following skin injury.
SMP intervention increases superoxide dismutase activity after NM-induced injury
Skin injury leads to the excessive release of ROS. Antioxidant enzymes play a major protective role against the deleterious effects of ROS, and superoxide dismutase (SOD) is among the most important of these enzymes36. Therefore, we evaluated how SMP treatment affected SOD activity in skin samples collected at 24-, 48-, and 72-h post-NM-injury (Fig. 5). We found that NM-induced injury resulted in significant suppression of SOD activity compared to uninjured skin at all evaluated time points (Fig. 5a–c), while SMP intervention provided a statistically significant rescue of SOD activity. The effect of SMPHi treatment on SOD activity was more pronounced than that of SMPLo.
We further investigated the activity of catalase and thioredoxin reductase, two other antioxidant enzymes important in skin, in response to SMP treatment. We did not find statistically significant differences in the activity of these enzymes between the experimental groups (Supplementary Fig. 8a, b).
Inhibition of Cu/Zn SOD partially reverses SMP effects on skin wound healing
To determine whether the pro-healing effects of SMP were dependent on preserving SOD activity, we performed NM-injury experiments in the presence of the SOD inhibitor ATN-224, a small molecule copper-chelator and well-known inhibitor of SOD1. The application of ATN-224 largely abrogated the positive effects of SMP on wound healing. The degree of skin edema was similar across all treatment groups (Fig. 5d), as were the rates of wound healing (Fig. 5e). Although SMPHi appeared to slightly increase the rate of wound healing, there were no statistically significant differences between the groups at days 2 and 3 post-injury. Additionally, after ATN-224 administration, SMP failed to inhibit apoptosis as demonstrated by TUNEL staining (Fig. 5f). Thus, the inhibition of Cu/Zn SOD partially reversed the beneficial effects of SMP on skin wound healing.
SMPLo protects human skin explants from NM-induced injury
With data in hand from mouse models, we next performed a proof-of-concept evaluation of the effect of SMP intervention on NM-injured human skin using ex vivo skin explants obtained from healthy donors following abdominoplasty surgery (n = 10, see Supplementary Table 1). This model provides valuable information concerning the keratinocyte population and pathophysiological behavior of the epidermal/dermal layers in a static manner. Static in the sense that, being an ex vivo model, explants do not have active circulation nor continuous influx of immune cells.
To assess the extent of NM-induced injury and effects of SMP treatment on the healthy human skin explants, blinded pathophysiological evaluation of hematoxylin- and eosin-stained slides was performed by a clinical dermatopathologist. NM-induced injury is characterized by rapid DNA damage followed by cell death and eventual blister formation. Therefore, the slides were evaluated by the following three histological criteria: (1) presence and degree of ballooning degeneration, spongiosis and epidermal pallor; (2) presence and number of dyskeratotic and apoptotic cells; and (3) presence and degree of subepidermal split. Criteria were scored on a scale of 0 to 2, with 0 representing an absence, and 2 representing a pronounced appearance of the evaluated characteristics. These criteria reflect the sequential order of NM-induced injury in the skin with skin blister formation representing the cumulative damage.
As expected, treatment of healthy skin explants with NM resulted in a significant increase of all three scored criteria (Fig. 6). While there was no significant effect of SMPs on ballooning degeneration, spongiosis, and epidermal pallor, the explants treated with SMPLo showed noticeable decreases in the number of dyskeratotic/apoptotic cells, with 20% of subjects demonstrating no dyskeratotic/apoptotic cells, as opposed to 100% of subjects having at least some presence of these cells in the vehicle group. Even more impressive results were obtained after the evaluation of the third criterion. In SMPLo treated explants, subepidermal split was completely prevented in 50% of explants, while it was present in all tissues in the vehicle group. SMPHi particles had a mild but non-statistical effect on sub-epidermal split mitigation.
Discussion
Topical application of Synthetic Melanin Particles (SMPs) improved skin healing after chemical and UV-induced injury. Melanin is a natural polymeric biomaterial that plays a role in skin protection against radiation20 and toxin insult23. Exposure to such harmful conditions often leads to an increase in melanin production in the skin as a natural response that capitalizes on melanin’s protective role. Due to its electron-rich functional groups, melanin has complex redox properties, allowing it to scavenge radical oxygen species and adsorb other harmful molecules that are generated in the skin during exposure37,38. Therefore, we reasoned that a biocompatible radical scavenging melanin-mimetic material presents an appealing topical intervention to promote tissue repair after chemical or UV injury.
SMPs were synthesized to mimic native melanin in the skin. Previous work with melanin nanoparticles similar to that of the Low Surface Area Synthetic Melanin Particles (SMPLo) demonstrated no toxicity or significant changes in cell viability in 2D cell cultures of human keratinocytes and an increase in protection against cell death from UV-induced damage22. High Surface Area Synthetic Melanin Particles (SMPHi)24, with increased exposure of the material to the surroundings, and therefore greater scavenging capacity, were synthesized to compare to SMPLo and further elucidate melanin’s role in wound healing especially surrounding reactive oxygen species (ROS).
During homeostasis, basal levels of ROS are tightly regulated and are involved in maintaining normal cellular function39. However, tissue injury from UV-irradiation or toxic chemical insult, such as in the case of nitrogen mustard (NM), results in the release of excessive amounts of ROS and oxidative stress. ROS produced during oxidative stress directly oxidizes membrane lipids, enzymes, structural proteins and nucleic acids, leading to cell death or improper cellular function40.
One of the main antioxidant enzymes in mammals is SOD, which converts superoxide radicals into hydrogen peroxide. The SOD family has three isoforms: Cu/Zn SOD1, which is located in the cytoplasm, nuclei, and intermembrane space of mitochondria; Mn/Zn SOD2, which resides in the mitochondrial matrix; and Cu/Zn SOD3, which is secreted extracellularly36,41. Mice lacking Sod2 are not viable, dying within 21 days of birth. Sod1 knock-out mice are largely normal but display delayed wound healing. In addition, Sod1 knockdown induces senescence in human fibroblasts42 and is necessary for maintaining mouse embryonic fibroblasts in cell culture43. Mice with knocked out Sod3 appear normal but have reduced survival time under high oxygen tension36. Thus, the rapid removal of highly reactive superoxide radicals by SOD is necessary for maintaining redox homeostasis and proper cellular survival and function. Additionally, the hydrogen peroxide molecules produced by SOD play a bactericidal/bacteriostatic role and act as secondary messengers. As a small uncharged molecule, hydrogen peroxide easily diffuses through membranes and tissues, which allows it to act as a chemoattractant for inflammatory cells and promote proliferation of keratinocytes, fibroblasts, and vascular endothelial cells12,44,45.
Given the role of SOD in wound healing, it is likely that the rescue of SOD activity by SMP underlies the beneficial effects of melanin intervention following NM-injury. The protection of SOD activity by SMPs may contribute to wound healing in three ways: by directly removing superoxide radicals, by reducing the bacterial burden in the wound area, and by indirectly regulating multiple signaling pathways via hydrogen peroxide production. In terms of our mechanistic understanding, it is known that SOD itself is susceptible to inactivation by ROS46. Therefore, we postulated that by scavenging the excess ROS produced during skin damage, SMPs would protect SOD from ROS-induced inactivation. Indeed, our data show that inhibition of Cu/Zn SOD with Cu chelator ATN-224 resulted in the dampening of the positive effects of SMP intervention, confirming the critical role of Cu/Zn SOD. Since a lack of SOD1 is known to delay wound healing, we dosed the SOD inhibitor intentionally to produce a relatively mild effect on wound healing as not to completely mask the effect of SMP on the healing process.
Stimulation of MAPK pathways leads to the activation of multiple cellular events, including inflammatory responses, apoptosis, migration, and proliferation. The exposure of mouse skin to vesicants such as sulfur mustard, NM, and 2-chloroethyl ethyl sulfide (CEES) results in MAPK phosphorylation, suggesting that MAPKs play a role in vesicant-induced inflammation. Kumar et al.35 found that skin levels of pro-inflammatory molecules, such as TNFα, iNOS, Mmp9, were significantly increased following NM injury in the mouse. Phosphorylation of Erk1/2, p38 and Jnk1/2 are also found to be increased. ROS has also been implicated in MAPK activation47. Our data fits well in this context, demonstrating that decreasing the ROS burden with SMPs decreases pro-inflammatory signaling in the injured mouse skin, decreases Erk1/2 phosphorylation, and suppresses apoptosis.
Melanin nanoparticles have been reported to decrease ROS and inflammatory processes after being actively engulfed by macrophages48. However, in our study, SMPs were applied topically and were not found to penetrate the stratum corneum. The beneficial effects of SMP intervention, such as decreased skin edema and increased SOD activity, were found to occur within 24 h of application before NM-induced skin injury was clinically evident. These observations argue that the efficacy of SMPs was not dependent on cellular uptake of the melanin particles by macrophages or another cell type. Although not observed, if a subset of particles penetrated the skin as a consequence of NM-inflicted damage, the positive effect of the initial SMP application cannot be explained by the direct cellular uptake of the melanin particles.
H2O2 is one of the main secondary messengers during wound healing response. It is reported to regulate angiogenesis, stimulating proliferation of vascular endothelial cells39,44. Indeed, SMPLo particles significantly increased angiogenesis after NM injury. The failure of SMPHi particles to influence the angiogenic response is surprising and merits further investigation.
The roles of the CD206 mannose receptor positive anti-inflammatory M2 macrophages and Tregs in the resolution of inflammation are well accepted3,4,49,50,51. CD206 M2 macrophages dampen inflammation in part by converting pro-inflammatory M1 macrophages towards an M2 phenotype through cell-cell contact and soluble factors52. We found that topical application of SMPs not only increases CD206 M2 macrophages in wounded skin, but also their communication with systemic inflammation as observed in the splenic populations of the NM-injured animals. The spleen plays a crucial role during an immune response, being an organ for immune cell proliferation and a reservoir of immune cells. Intervention with SMPs may have a direct effect on stabilizing the skin thus altering its chemokine expression and attraction of immune cells from the spleen and circulation. Furthermore, the data suggests skin in situ activity as splenic inflammatory monocytes did not express anti-inflammatory cytokines IL-10/TGFb. They are only observed in the skin consistent with maturing CD206 monocytes acquiring the pro-resolution characteristics as they enter a target microenvironment53. Fittingly, it was reported that in NM-exposed rats, the splenectomy was responsible for increasing M1 macrophages and decreasing subsets of M2 macrophages, resulting in exacerbated tissue injury54. The relationship between CD206 M2 macrophages and regulatory T cells is complex. In vitro, CD206 M2 macrophages can generate Tregs through cell-cell contact while in vivo, therapeutic infusion of CD206 M2 macrophages increases splenic regulatory T cells52. The latter was observed in a nephritis injury model at 21 days (3 weeks) suggesting de-novo Treg generation. By contrast, our acute injury model shows an increase in skin with concomitant decrease in splenic Tregs at day 3 suggesting mobilization and re-distribution rather than de novo Treg generation.
The alteration of local and systemic immune responses thus plays a key role in the protective function of SMPs. In human explant experiments, SMPLo particles demonstrated impressive mitigation of skin tissue damage and prevention of blisters after NM-injury. Topical application of SMPLo prevented both cellular damage and the cumulative effect of epidermal-dermal separation. The absence of any effect of SMPHi particles on skin explants may reflect the importance of immunological response in SMPHi signaling. Indeed, since the ex vivo explants do not possess a functional circulation, the effect of SMPHi may be diminished. These differences between particle type may be potentially attributed to the morphology of the particles and how they interact with the stratum corneum as a result; a finding that requires further investigation and optimization in subsequent testing. Furthermore, the skin explant model devoid of immune cells will be useful for investigations to assess chemokines and factors produced by the epithelial barrier critical for the recruitment of destructive or reparative immune cells.
We predicted that an increase in the surface area of the melanin particles would contribute to their antioxidant capacity and tissue healing ability. SMPHi has higher radical scavenging activity at lower concentrations than SMPLo and demonstrated superior performance in wound repair. Generally, synthetic melanin particles have several distinct features that make them an excellent candidate for therapeutic applications. Being a natural product biomimetic, they are inherently biocompatible and non-allergenic. In addition, their surface charge, size, and surface area may be modified, allowing for ease of delivery onto the site of injury55,56. The tunable surface area also creates numerous possibilities for the melanin particles, broadening their applications beyond wound-healing targets. Taken together, our data demonstrate that synthetic melanin nanoparticles significantly improve wound healing and have strong potential to be developed as therapeutic agents.
Methods
Materials
Tetraethyl orthosilicate (TEOS) and 25 wt% poly(acrylic acid) solution (PAA) were purchased from Acros Organics. Hexadecyltrimethylammonium bromide (CTAB) was purchased from Tokyo Chemical Industry (TCI). Dopamine hydrochloride was obtained from Alfa Aesar. Ammonium hydroxide was purchased from Fisher Scientific. Hydrofluoric acid (HF), ethanol, and Trizma®Base (tris) were obtained from Sigma Aldrich. All materials were used as received without further purification.
Preparation of SMPLo
SMPLo was synthesized through the oxidative polymerization of dopamine. Briefly, 900 mg of dopamine was dissolved in 300 mL of ultrapure water and 4.2 mL of 1 M NaOH was added to the solution at room temperature and stirred for 18 h. The solution was then centrifuged and washed with ultrapure water 5 times.
Preparation of mesoporous silica template
Mesoporous silica nanoparticles (MS) used as a template were synthesized based on a previously reported literature method57. Briefly, 0.55 g CTAB and 3.00 g PAA were dissolved under 25 mL of ultrapure water and stirred vigorously until the solution was clear. 2.0 g ammonium hydroxide was added to the stirring solution. After 20 min, 2.08 g TEOS was added and stirred for an additional 15 min. Then the solution was placed in an oven for 48 h at 120 °C. The mixture was then centrifuged and dried before calcining the particles for 6 h at 550 °C to remove the remaining organic template.
Preparation of SMPHi
SMPHi was prepared based on a reported literature method24. 250 mg of MS was sonicated for 1 h in ultrapure water. To 225 mL of ultrapure water and 25 mL of ethanol (9:1 H2O:EtOH by volume), 250 mg MS and 225 mg dopamine was added and stirred for 1 h at room temperature. Tris (10 mM, pH 8.5) was then added to the reaction and stirred for an additional 4 h. After the allotted time, the reaction was centrifuged and washed with ultrapure water 5 times. The template was removed through hydrofluoric acid (10 wt%) etch overnight, and then centrifuged and washed with ultrapure water 5 times.
DPPH assay for radical scavenging activity
DPPH radical scavenging activity of SMPs was determined according to a reported literature method58. 100 µL of SMP dispersed in water was added to a 1.8 mL solution of DPPH (0.2 mM in 95% ethanol). The total amount of particles was varied from 5 to 200 µg. The solutions were left in the dark for 20 min. Afterwards, the scavenging activity was monitored by taking the absorbance of the solutions at 516 nm. To determine the DPPH radical scavenging activity the following calculation (Eq. 1) was used.
I is the DPPH radical scavenging activity, Ai is the absorbance of the samples with DPPH, Aj is the absorbance of the samples without DPPH, and Ac is the absorbance of the DPPH without the PDA samples.
Particle characterization
All SMPs were characterized by transmission electron microscopy (TEM, Hitachi HT-7700, 120 KV, or STEM, Hitachi HD-2300A, 200 KV). Dynamic light scattering (DLS, Malvern Instruments Ltd, Nano ZS), zeta-potential (Malvern Instruments Ltd, Nano ZS), and ultraviolet-visible spectroscopy (UV-Vis, Agilent Technologies Cary 100 UV-Vis) were used to investigate hydrodynamic diameters.
Sample activation for surface area measurements
Using a Micromeritics Smart VacPrep, samples were activated thermally under vacuum at 100 °C for the mesoporous silica and 75 °C for the pre-etched SMPHi. Samples were activated using a tousimis SAMDRI-PVT-3D Advanced Manual Critical Point Dryer. Prior to activation, samples were exchanged into ethanol overnight. Using the supercritical dryer, the sample was added to the sample chamber, cooled to 0–10 °C, and pressurized to 800 psi. The ethanol was exchanged with liquid CO2 over the course of 10 h, purging the system for f5 min every 2 h. After the fifth purge, the temperature was raised to 40 °C and the system was pressurized to 1200–1400 psi. The pressure was released slowly overnight at a rate of 0.5 cc/min. Samples were immediately transferred onto a Micromeritics Smart VacPrep and were placed under vacuum for 2 h at 25 °C prior to sorption measurements.
Nitrogen isotherms
For SMP samples, N2 isotherms were collected on a Micromeritics ASAP 2420 instrument at 77 K. Pore-size distributions were obtained using density functional theory (DFT) calculations with a carbon slit geometry and a N2 DFT model.
Animals
All animal studies were conducted in accordance with NIH guidelines for the care and use of laboratory animals and protocols were approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee of Northwestern University. Six to eight-week-old C57BL/6J female mice were purchased from Jackson Laboratories.
Nitrogen mustard skin injury model
Mice were exposed to nitrogen mustard (NM) as described previously59. Briefly, the dorsal area of mice was shaved and chemically depilated 48 h before skin injury induction. Mice were anesthetized and placed on a heating pad under a chemical fume hood. 0.5% (w/v) of mechlorethamine hydrochloride (nitrogen mustard, Sigma, #122564) solution in 1.5% DMSO-PBS was prepared immediately before the application. A total of 40 µl of NM solution was applied on a circular (12 mm diameter) area in two consecutive applications. After the application mice were placed in a temporary housing space under a chemical fume hood for 2 h.
UV radiation skin injury model
Mice were exposed to UV radiation as described previously60. Briefly, a 12 mm diameter circular area of back skin depilated of hair was exposed to UVB irradiation from six FS-40 fluorescent lamps filtered through Kodacel (Eastman Kodak Co., Rochester, NY). UVB emission was measured with an IL-443 phototherapy radiometer (International Light, Newburyport, MA) furnished with an IL SED 240 detector. Mice were exposed to a single UVB dose of 100 mJ/cm2 to induce skin inflammation.
Synthetic melanin particles intervention
SMPs were diluted in milli-Q water at concentration of 50 µg/µl. A total amount of 1 mg of particles were applied to the injured skin area 2 h after the injury induction, and then 24 and 48 h later. Milli-Q water was used as a vehicle. During the treatment mice were anesthetized using isoflurane.
Monitoring skin injury and measurement of wound healing
Mice were examined non-invasively after induction of skin injury. Monitoring (including photographic images, bi-fold skin thickness and body weight measurements) was performed daily, starting on the day of skin injury. Photographs of the injured area were taken using a fixed-position camera. The bi-fold skin thickness of the injured area was measured using digital calipers (Mitutoyo, PK0505CPX). The area of the inflammation/wound was measured using Image J and QuPath software.
Ex vivo human skin explant cultures, NM treatment, and SMP intervention
De-identified and discarded surgically resected human skin tissue was collected at Northwestern Memorial Hospital from abdominoplasty surgeries by the Northwestern University Skin Biology and Diseases Resource-based Center. The skin tissue was subsequently obtained from the Northwestern University Skin Tissue Engineering and Morphology Core. All tissues were collected in compliance with the Northwestern University Internal Review Board (#STU00009443).
The explants were collected from the skin samples of patients of various ethnicities, with an age range 25–51 years, median age ± st. dev. 36.6 ± 6.4 years (supplementary Table 1). Full-thickness punches (d = 12 mm) were collected, rinsed in sterile PBS, and after removal of the subcutaneous layer of fat placed onto stainless steel mesh platforms in a 60 mm petri dish. The RPMI-1640 media (Corning, #10–040-CM) supplemented with 10% FBS and penicillin/streptomycin (200 U/ml and 200 µg/ml, respectively) was added to the dishes so that the top of the mesh platform with explants remained above the level of media. The explants were incubated at 37oC and 5% CO2 overnight. After the incubation, freshly prepared 0.5% (w/v) solution of nitrogen mustard in a Clinique Dramatically DifferentTM Moisturizing Gel/PBS (2 volumes of Gel/1 volume of PBS) was applied on the explant surface in two consecutive applications (total volume 40 µl). SMPs were applied as described above. The explants were kept in the incubator at 37oC and 5% CO2 for up to 48 h. The media were changed daily.
The extent of NM-induced injury and the effects of SMP intervention on skin explants were assessed by a blinded clinical dermatopathologist. Three histological criteria were used: (1) presence and degree of ballooning degeneration, spongiosis and epidermal pallor; (2) presence and number of dyskeratotic and apoptotic cells; and (3) presence and degree of subepidermal split. Criteria were scored on a scale of 0 to 2, with 0 representing an absence, and 2 representing a pronounced appearance of the evaluated characteristics.
SOD, catalase and thioredoxin reductase activity measurements
Superoxide dismutase activity was measured using commercial SOD assay kit (Cayman Chemical #706002) following the manufacturer’s protocol. Briefly, frozen tissue samples were homogenized using PowerLyzer 24 Homogenizer (Qiagen) in cold 20 mM HEPES buffer (pH 7.2, containing 1 mM EGTA, 210 mM mannitol and 70 mM sucrose) and centrifuged at 10,000 g for 15 min at 4 °C. Resulting supernatant was assayed for SOD activity using a tetrazolium salt for detection of superoxide radicals. Absorbance was measured using a Victor plate reader (Perkin Elmer, Inc.). Catalase and thioredoxin reductase activity was measured using commercially available kits (Cayman Chemical #707002 and #10007892, respectively) following the manufacturer’s protocols.
ATN-224 treatment
Animals were treated with ATN-224 (Cayman chemical #23553) in sterile saline at the dose of 4.5 mg/kg/day by oral gavage. The treatment was performed on days 0, 1, and 2 immediately prior to the SMP application. Vehicle group received saline.
Western Blotting
Mouse skin samples were mechanically disrupted in ice cold RIPA buffer (ThermoFisher, 89900). The protein homogenates were heated to 95 degrees C for 5 min in 6x Laemmli SDS sample buffer (ThermoFisher, J61337.AC) with 10% 2-Mercaptoethanol (Sigma-Aldrich, M6250) then electrophoresed using a 4–15% Mini-PROTEAN® TGX™ precast protein gel (Bio-Rad, #4561083) and transferred to a 0.45 µm pore size PVDF blotting membrane (Cytiva, GE10600023). Blots were incubated with primary antibody overnight at 4 °C. Primary antibodies used in this study were purchased from Cell Signaling (#4695, #4377, # 4970; 1:1000 dilution). Blots were then incubated for 1 h at room temperature with horseradish peroxidase-labeled secondary antibody (Cell Signaling, #7074, 1:1000 dilution). Proteins were visualized by chemiluminescence (GE Healthcare, RPN2232). All blots were processed in parallel and derived from the same experiment.
qPCR
Skin injury and wound healing-related gene expression profiling were measured with real-time quantitative PCR. Tissue samples were homogenized using PowerLyzer 24 Homogenizer (Qiagen) and total RNA was extracted from skin tissue using RNeasy Fibrous Tissue Mini Kit (Qiagen, 74704) according to the manufacturer’s protocol. TaqMan Gene Expression assays were used for measuring the relative gene expression levels of Mmp9 (Mm00442991_m1). The relative expression fold change was calculated using the ddCt method. QuantStudio 7 real-time PCR System (ThermoFisher) was used for running quantitative PCRs.
TaqMan immune array
TaqMan Mouse Immune Array v2.1 (Applied Biosystems #4365297) was used to obtain the differential gene expression profile of immune response-related genes. Experiments were performed according to the manufacturer’s protocol. Since each array card has a capacity for four samples and we had four experimental groups of animals (i.e., no treatment, NM+vehicle, NM+SMPLo and SMPHi), to increase the number of samples assayed we pooled cDNA samples of three mice in each experimental group per array card. The arrays were repeated three times, in total using cDNA pooled from nine different mice in each experimental group, except for “no treatment” group, where the same three cDNA samples were used repeatedly. This “no treatment” group data was used to correct for the batch effects of the Ct values obtained from three independent arrays. The ddCt values were calculated using NM+vehicle group data as a reference, and one-sample t-test analysis was used to calculate the p values.
TUNEL staining
The skin samples from euthanized mice were taken and fixed in neutral buffered 10% formalin diluted in PBS (Caplugs, 308–1101-G8T). Samples were then embedded in paraffin, sectioned (8-μm thickness), and stained. The coverslip was mounted using antifade mounting medium with DAPI (Vectasheild H-1200–10). The TUNEL assay was performed using the CF®640 R Dye TUNEL assay apoptosis detection kits (Biotium, 30074) according to the manufacturer’s directions and visualized with an ECLIPSE Ti2 inverted microscope (Nikon Tokyo, Japan) using a DS-Qi2 camera (Nikon). TUNEL staining was quantified by drawing a region of interest around the epidermis ensuring removal of any sectioning artifacts such as tissue tears and folding from the analysis. The fluorescence intensity of the TUNEL staining was normalized by the fluorescence intensity of the DAPI staining within the region of interest.
CD31 staining
The skin samples from euthanized mice were taken and fixed in neutral buffered 10% formalin diluted in PBS (Caplugs, 308–1101-G8T). Samples were then embedded in paraffin, sectioned (8-μm thickness), and stained for CD31 and using eosin. Staining was done by the Northwestern University Mouse Histology and Phenotyping Laboratory. CD31 & eosin stained slides were visualized with a TissueFAXS Histo inverted microscope (TissueGnostics GmbH Vienna, Austria). Staining was quantified by drawing a region of interest adjacent to the wound area for the purpose of eliminating nonspecific CD31 stained areas. The ImageJ DAB staining color deconvolution function was used to separate eosin and DAB staining. The number of objects positive for DAB staining were normalized by the number of objects positive for eosin staining.
Flow cytometry
Mouse skin samples were digested and dissociated cells were stained and analyzed by flow cytometry as described elsewhere59. The numbers of each subpopulation in the skin and spleen were determined by multiplying the percentage of lineage marker–positive cells by the total number of mononuclear cells isolated from the corresponding tissue.
Single cells were incubated with Fc block (anti-mouse CD16/32, 0.25 μg; eBioscience, San Diego, CA), washed with FACS buffer (PBS with 2.5% fetal bovine serum and 0.1% NaN3), and were then stained for surface markers using the specified antibodies in the table below. Cells were then washed with PBS, and viability staining was performed using the LIVE/DEAD fixable dead cell stain kit (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA). Following viability staining, cells were washed with PBS and were either resuspended in FACS buffer for flow cytometric analysis or were subjected to intracellular staining to detect inducible CD206, or FoxP3. For intracellular staining, cells were fixed and permeabilized using the FoxP3 staining buffer kit (eBioscience) and then intracellularly stained. As controls, fluorescence minus one (FMO) was used to place the gates for analysis.
For flow cytometric analysis, cells were first gated according to forward and side scatter and then restricted to single cells and live cells. Tissue infiltrating myeloid cells were identified as CD45+CD11b+CD3− and infiltrating lymphoid cells as CD45+CD11b−CD3+ for T cells and CD45+CD3−CD11b−B220+CD11c− for B cells. On the infiltrating lymphoid population, cells were gated on CD3+CD4+CD8− or CD3+CD8+CD4− to evaluate the different T lymphocyte subpopulations. For infiltrating myeloid cells, Ly6G+ neutrophils were first gated and excluded from the infiltrating myeloid subpopulations. The Ly6G− myeloid cells were divided into CD11c+ and CD11c− monocytes/macrophages. Finally, the monocytes/macrophages were further divided into Ly6Chi inflammatory monocytes and Ly6clo noninflammatory monocytes. Expression of CD206 was evaluated on the monocyte/macrophage subpopulation.
Mouse-specific antibodies used are listed in Table 1. The dilutions were made according to the antibody concentrations. For 2 mg/ml concentration, 1:100 dilution was used. For different concentrations, the dilution was adjusted accordingly. AbA 6-laser Fortessa flow cytometer (BD Biosciences) was used to enumerate cell populations and the data was analyzed using FlowJo software (TreeStar, Ashland, OR).
Statistical analysis
GraphPad Prism V.8.3.0 software (San Diego, CA) was used to create visual graphics and to calculate the statistical significance. One-way ANOVA, chi-square and t test were used to calculate the p-values.
Reporting summary
Further information on research design is available in the Nature Research Reporting Summary linked to this article.
Data availability
The data that supports the findings of this study are available from the corresponding authors upon reasonable request.
References
Falanga, V. et al. Chronic wounds. Nat. Rev. Dis. Prim. 8, 50 (2022).
Eming, S. A., Martin, P. & Tomic-Canic, M. Wound repair and regeneration: mechanisms, signaling, and translation. Sci. Transl. Med 6, 265sr266 (2014).
Willenborg, S., Injarabian, L. & Eming, S. A. Role of macrophages in wound healing. Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Biol. 14, a041216 (2022)
Das, A. et al. Monocyte and macrophage plasticity in tissue repair and regeneration. Am. J. Pathol. 185, 2596–2606 (2015).
Wan, R. et al. Diabetic wound healing: the impact of diabetes on myofibroblast activity and its potential therapeutic treatments. Wound Repair Regen. 29, 573–581 (2021).
Wier, E. M. & Garza, L. A. Through the lens of hair follicle neogenesis, a new focus on mechanisms of skin regeneration after wounding. Semin. Cell Dev. Biol. 100, 122–129 (2020).
Xue, Y., Reddy, S. K. & Garza, L. A. Toward understanding wound immunology for high-fidelity skin regeneration. Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Biol. 14, a041241 (2022)
Li, J., Chen, J. & Kirsner, R. Pathophysiology of acute wound healing. Clin. Dermatol. 25, 9–18 (2007).
Sies, H. Oxidative stress: a concept in redox biology and medicine. Redox Biol. 4, 180–183 (2015).
Cho, M., Hunt, T. K. & Hussain, M. Z. Hydrogen peroxide stimulates macrophage vascular endothelial growth factor release. Am. J. Physiol. Heart Circ. Physiol. 280, H2357–H2363 (2001).
Roy, S., Khanna, S., Nallu, K., Hunt, T. K. & Sen, C. K. Dermal wound healing is subject to redox control. Mol. Ther. 13, 211–220 (2006).
Loo, A. E., Ho, R. & Halliwell, B. Mechanism of hydrogen peroxide-induced keratinocyte migration in a scratch-wound model. Free Radic. Biol. Med. 51, 884–892 (2011).
Shi, M. M., Godleski, J. J. & Paulauskis, J. D. Regulation of macrophage inflammatory protein-1α mRNA by oxidative stress. J. Biol. Chem. 271, 5878–5883 (1996).
Comino-Sanz, I. M., López-Franco, M. D., Castro, B. & Pancorbo-Hidalgo, P. L. The role of antioxidants on wound healing: a review of the current evidence. J. Clin. Med. 10, 3558 (2021).
Deng, Z. et al. M1 macrophage mediated increased reactive oxygen species (ROS) influence wound healing via the MAPK signaling in vitro and in vivo. Toxicol. Appl. Pharmacol. 366, 83–95 (2019).
Nguyen, T. T. T., Ghosh, C., Hwang, S.-G., Tran, L. D. & Park, J. S. Characteristics of curcumin-loaded Poly (Lactic Acid) nanofibers for wound healing. J. Mater. Sci. 48, 7125–7133 (2013).
Jung, B.-O., Chung, S.-J. & Lee, S. B. Preparation and characterization of eugenol-grafted chitosan hydrogels and their antioxidant activities. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 99, 3500–3506 (2006).
Xiao, J., Chen, S., Yi, J., Zhang, H. F. & Ameer, G. A. A cooperative copper metal-organic framework-hydrogel system improves wound healing in diabetes. Adv. Funct. Mater. 27, 1604872 (2017).
Lin, J. Y. & Fisher, D. E. Melanocyte biology and skin pigmentation. Nature 445, 843–850 (2007).
Brenner, M. & Hearing, V. J. The protective role of melanin against UV damage in human skin. Photochem. Photobiol. 84, 539–549 (2008).
Simon, J. D. & Peels, D. N. The red and the black. Acc. Chem. Res. 43, 1452–1460 (2010).
Huang, Y. et al. Mimicking melanosomes: polydopamine nanoparticles as artificial microparasols. ACS Cent. Sci. 3, 564–569 (2017).
Grether‐Beck, S. et al. Air pollution‐induced tanning of human skin. Br. J. Dermatol. 185, 1026–1034 (2021).
Siwicka, Z. E. et al. Synthetic porous melanin. JACS 143, 3094–3103 (2021).
Neil, J. E., Brown, M. B. & Williams, A. C. Human skin explant model for the investigation of topical therapeutics. Sci. Rep. 10 (2020).
Shakarjian, M. P. et al. Preferential expression of matrix metalloproteinase-9 in mouse skin after sulfur mustard exposure. J. Appl. Toxicol. 26, 239–246 (2006).
Laskin, J. D. et al. Oxidants and antioxidants in sulfur mustard-induced injury. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 1203, 92–100 (2010).
Sharma, O. P. & Bhat, T. K. DPPH antioxidant assay revisited. Food Chem. 113, 1202–1205 (2009).
Xu, K. et al. Physicochemical properties and antioxidant activities of luteolin-phospholipid complex. Molecules 14, 3486–3493 (2009).
Jirovetz, L. et al. Chemical composition and antioxidant properties of clove leaf essential oil. J. Agric. Food Chem. 54, 6303–6307 (2006).
Zhou, X. et al. Artificial allomelanin nanoparticles. ACS Nano 13, 10980–10990 (2019).
Shakarjian, M. P. et al. Mechanisms mediating the vesicant actions of sulfur mustard after cutaneous exposure. Toxicol. Sci. 114, 5–19 (2010).
Singh, R. K., Kumar, S., Prasad, D. N. & Bhardwaj, T. R. Therapeutic journery of nitrogen mustard as alkylating anticancer agents: historic to future perspectives. Eur. J. Med. Chem. 151, 401–433 (2018).
Thomas, P. D. et al. PANTHER: a library of protein families and subfamilies indexed by function. Genome Res. 13, 2129–2141 (2003).
Kumar, D. et al. Nitrogen mustard exposure of murine skin induces DNA damage, oxidative stress and activation of MAPK/Akt-AP1 pathway leading to induction of inflammatory and proteolytic mediators. Toxicol. Lett. 235, 161–171 (2015).
Wang, Y., Branicky, R., Noë, A. & Hekimi, S. Superoxide dismutases: dual roles in controlling ROS damage and regulating ROS signaling. J. Cell. Biol. 217, 1915–1928 (2018).
Cavallini, C. et al. Melanin and melanin-like hybrid materials in regenerative medicine. Nanomaterials 10, 1518 (2020).
Lei, Q. et al. Microneedle patches integrated with biomineralized melanin nanoparticles for simultaneous skin tumor photothermal therapy and wound healing. Adv. Func. Mater. 32, 2113269 (2022).
Dunnill, C. et al. Reactive oxygen species (ROS) and wound healing: the functional role of ROS and emerging ROS-modulating technologies for augmentation of the healing process. Int. Wound J. 14, 89–96 (2017).
Forman, H. J. & Zhang, H. Targeting oxidative stress in disease: promise and limitations of antioxidant therapy. Nat. Rev. Drug Discov. 20, 689–709 (2021).
Kurahashi, T. & Fujii, J. Roles of antioxidative enzymes in wound healing. J. Dev. Biol. 3, 57–70 (2015).
Blander, G., De Oliveira, R. M., Conboy, C. M., Haigis, M. & Guarente, L. Superoxide dismutase 1 knock-down induces senescence in human fibroblasts. J. Biol. Chem. 278, 38966–38969 (2003).
Tsunoda, S., Kibe, N., Kurahashi, T. & Fujii, J. Differential responses of SOD1-deficient mouse embryonic fibroblasts to oxygen concentrations. Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 537, 5–11 (2013).
Stone, J. R. & Collins, T. The role of hydrogen peroxide in endothelial proliferative responses. Endothelium 9, 231–238 (2002).
Wittmann, C. et al. Hydrogen peroxide in inflammation: messenger, guide, and assassin. Adv. Hematol. 2012, 1–6 (2012).
Pigeolet, E. et al. Glutathione peroxidase, superoxide dismutase, and catalase inactivation by peroxides and oxygen derived free radicals. Mech. Ageing Dev. 51, 283–297 (1990).
Son, Y. et al. Mitogen-activated protein kinases and reactive oxygen species: how can ROS activate MAPK pathways? J. Signal Transduct. 2011, 1–6 (2011).
Zhao, H. et al. Polydopamine nanoparticles for the treatment of acute inflammation-induced injury. Nanoscale 10, 6981–6991 (2018).
Kalekar, L. A. & Rosenblum, M. D. Regulatory T cells in inflammatory skin disease: from mice to humans. Int. Immunol. 31, 457–463 (2019).
Panduro, M., Benoist, C. & Mathis, D. Tissue tregs. Annu. Rev. Immunol. 34, 609–633 (2016).
Liao, X. et al. Kruppel-like factor 4 regulates macrophage polarization. J. Clin. Investig. 121, 2736–2749 (2011).
Du, Q. et al. Transfusion of CD206(+) M2 macrophages ameliorates antibody-mediated glomerulonephritis in mice. Am. J. Pathol. 186, 3176–3188 (2016).
Wright, P. B. et al. The mannose receptor (CD206) identifies a population of colonic macrophages in health and inflammatory bowel disease. Sci. Rep. 11, 19616 (2021).
Venosa, A. et al. Protective role of spleen-derived macrophages in lung inflammation, injury, and fibrosis induced by nitrogen mustard. Am. J. Physiol. Lung Cell Mol. Physiol. 309, L1487–1498 (2015).
McCallum, N. C. et al. Allomelanin: a biopolymer of intrinsic microporosity. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 143, 4005–4016 (2021).
Zhou, X. et al. Hydrophobic melanin via post-synthetic modification for controlled self-assembly. ACS Nano 16, 19087–19095 (2022).
Wang, J.-G., Zhou, H.-J., Sun, P.-C., Ding, D.-T. & Chen, T.-H. Hollow carved single-crystal mesoporous silica templated by mesomorphous polyelectrolyte−surfactant complexes. Chem. Mater. 22, 3829–3831 (2010).
Ju, K.-Y., Lee, Y., Lee, S., Park, S. B. & Lee, J.-K. Bioinspired polymerization of dopamine to generate melanin-like nanoparticles having an excellent free-radical-scavenging property. Biomacromolecules 12, 625–632 (2011).
Biyashev, D. et al. A novel treatment for skin repair using a combination of spironolactone and vitamin D3. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 1480, 170–182 (2020).
Das, L. M., Binko, A. M., Traylor, Z. P., Peng, H. & Lu, K. Q. Vitamin D improves sunburns by increasing autophagy in M2 macrophages. Autophagy 15, 813–826 (2019).
Acknowledgements
The authors disclose the support for the research described in this study from the National Institutes of Health and National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases (NIAMS) U54 AR079795 Northwestern University CounterACT Center of Excellence (K.Q.L. and N.C.G.), a MURI through the Air Force Office of Scientific Research FA 9550-18-1-0142 (N.C.G.), Northwestern University Skin Biology and Diseases Resource-based Center P30 AR075049. This work made use of the EPIC and Keck-II facilities of Northwestern University’s NUANCE Center, which has received support from the Soft and Hybrid Nanotechnology Experimental (SHyNE) Resource (NSF ECCS-1542205), the MRSEC program (NSF DMR-1720139) at the Materials Research Center, the International Institute for Nanotechnology (IIN), the Keck Foundation, and the State of Illinois, through the IIN. O.K.F. gratefully acknowledges support from the Defense Threat Reduction Agency (HDTRA1-19-1-0010). F.A.S. is supported by the Department of Defense (DoD) through the National Defense Science & Engineering Graduate Fellowship Program. Z.E.S. and F.A.S. are supported by the International Institute for Nanotechnology (IIN) through the Ryan Fellowship. This work was supported by the Northwestern University NUSeq Core Facility. Imaging work was performed at the Northwestern University Center for Advanced Microscopy generously supported by NCI CCSG P30 CA060553 awarded to the Robert H Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center. Histology services were provided by the Northwestern University Research Histology and Phenotyping Laboratory which is supported by NCI P30-CA060553 awarded to the Robert H Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
D.B. designed and performed in-vivo and ex-vivo experiments and analysis, qPCR and enzymatic activity measurements. Z.E.S. provided the materials for biological experiments and performed material characterization. U.V.O performed in-vivo experiments and qPCR array, M.D. performed the western blot and TUNEL staining, D.X. performed flow cytometry experiments and analysis and S.T.E. analyzed the array data. S.D.M. provided assistance with immune analysis. C.V.N. analyzed skin explant images. F.A.S. with guidance from O.K.F. performed nitrogen adsorption isotherms. D.B., Z.E.S., and M.K.E. wrote the manuscript with input and revisions from all authors. N.K.P. and N.C.M. provided discussion and guidance for the project. N.C.G. and K.Q.L. were responsible for the overall direction and planning of the project.
Corresponding authors
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary Information
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Biyashev, D., Siwicka, Z.E., Onay, U.V. et al. Topical application of synthetic melanin promotes tissue repair. npj Regen Med 8, 61 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41536-023-00331-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41536-023-00331-1