arising from Md Nurul Huda et al. npj Quantum Materials https://doi.org/10.1038/s41535-020-0219-3 (2020).
In a recent article1, Huda et al. demonstrated tuneable topological domain wall states in the c(2 × 2) chlorinated Cu(100)2. Their system allows to experimentally tune the domain wall states using atom manipulation by the tip of a scanning tunneling microscope (STM). They have realized topological domain wall states of two prototypical one-dimensional models such as trimer3 and coupled dimer chains4,5,6,7,8. However, they did not distinguish trivial domain wall states9 from topological ones in their models. As a result, all states of a specific domain wall are not topological but trivial. Here, we show why the specific domain wall states are trivial and how to make them topological. This topological consideration would provide more clear insight into future studies on topological domain wall states in artificial atomic chains.
Before discussing the topology of domain walls, we need to introduce an important constraint in the coupled dimer chains as follows. A coupled dimer chain consists of two interacting Su-Schrieffer-Heeger (SSH) chains that connect each other via the zigzag interchain coupling (dashed lines in Fig. 1). Since each SSH chain undergoes a period-doubling charge-density-wave (CDW) transition through the Peierls dimerization at low temperature, a coupled dimer chain also exhibits the Peierls dimerization. The equilibrium atomic displacement (±Δ0 in Fig. 1, up to 10% of the undimerized atomic spacing10,11) is determined by the balance between the electronic energy gain due to the CDW gap opening and the elastic energy cost due to the Peierls dimerization. When we construct any topological domain walls in coupled dimer chains, we keep in mind that they should be able to be undimerized within reasonable atomic displacements. This constraint guarantees that there are no structural defects such as vacancies or extra atoms in topological domain walls.
However, the previously-reported domain wall structure (Fig. 1a) has a single vacancy when it is undimerized. In addition, its characteristic zigzag interchain coupling is also missing at the domain wall. Due to such imperfections, we cannot properly discuss its topology. Furthermore, the domain wall is not topological without considering the constraint because both upper and lower SSH chains are topologically trivial (see below). To rectify these imperfections, we simply modify the domain wall by including the ‘missing’ atom (Fig. 1b).
In the SSH model, the topological invariants or Zak phases12 of dimer chains depend on the ratio between intradimer (t) and interdimer (\(t^{\prime}\)) hopping parameters. The Zak phase, θZak, can be obtained through the Bloch wave functions \(\left|{u}_{k}\right\rangle\): \({\theta }_{\rm Zak}={{{\rm{i}}}}\int\nolimits_{-\pi /2{a}_{0}}^{\pi /2{a}_{0}}\left\langle {u}_{k}| {\partial }_{k}{u}_{k}\right\rangle \,dk\), where a0 is the lattice period of the undimerized chain. A ground state shows θZak = 0 (blue region in Supplementary Fig. 1a) when \(| t/t^{\prime} |\, > \,1\) while θZak = π (red region in Supplementary Fig. 1b) when \(| t/t^{\prime} |\, < \,1\). Due to the bulk-boundary correspondence, topological domain wall states emerge at the interface between topologically distinct Zak phases while we do not expect any topological edge states between the topologically same Zak phases. Such topological domain wall states depend only on topology of ground states but not the strength of hopping parameters9. As shown in Supplementary Fig. 1c, d, both domain wall states do maintain their topology even though trivial edge states appear at higher hopping parameters.
By coupling two SSH chains, we introduce a coupled dimer chain with four ground states where topological chiral domain wall states can emerge when one of two SSH subchains has an interface between topologically distinct Zak phases5,6,7,8. However, the defective domain wall AA → AB (Fig. 1a) proposed by Huda et al. actually does not have any topological edge mode because both the upper and lower SSH chains exhibit the same trivial topology (Supplementary Fig. 1e). In contrast, the corrected domain wall AA → AB (Fig. 1b) has a topological edge mode at the lower chain (Supplementary Fig. 1f).
Based on our topological consideration, we perform the tight-binding calculations as Huda et al. did1 to compare two structurally and topologically different domain walls. As shown in Fig. 2a, b, two domain wall configurations exhibit distinct energy spectra. Most notably, all domain wall states (black dots) are trivial in Fig. 2a while a topological domain wall state (red dot) emerges in the upper band gap in Fig. 2b. We confirm that such domain wall states are adiabatically connected to non-interacting SSH chains without interchain coupling (as we described above) as well as that some trivial domain states appear under the strong interchain coupling (Supplementary Fig. 2).
Furthermore, we check the spatial localization of these domain wall states by plotting the simulated local density of states (LDOS) maps as shown in Fig. 2d–f. Whereas the trivial domain wall state is localized at the upper chain with no phase shift (θZak = 0 → 0, Fig. 2d), the topological state mainly exists at the domain wall site on the lower chain with the distinct topology shift (θZak = 0 → π, Fig. 2e). In addition, the topological domain wall state only shows characteristic alternating zero LDOS next to the domain wall just like SSH topological solitons10,13. Such topological properties are also observed in another chiral domain wall AA → BA reported by Huda et al. (Fig. 2c, f). Note that Fig. 2b, c now exhibit the topologically opposite chirality, which has been reported in other systems5,6,8.
We showed why the original domain wall configuration is not topological and the new configuration has the topological domain wall state. However, the new configuration is impossible to realize on the chlorinated Cu(100) because the domain wall should be located in between chlorine sites. Instead, we propose an alternative configuration (Supplementary Fig. 3) with the same topology, which requires higher energy cost. Thus, we can experimentally access both topological and trivial domain states because they now exist below the conduction band of the chlorine layer1.
Although Huda et al. have demonstrated various tuneable topological domain wall states using atom manipulation, they have not properly considered the atomic and topological structures. As a result, one of the domain wall configurations proposed by Huda et al. does not have any topological edge mode due to the atomic vacancy and is inconsistent with their other topological domain walls. To overcome this inconsistency, we suggested the alternative domain wall configuration without defects leading to a topological domain wall state. Our analysis would be corroborated by topological invariants of chiral domain wall states, which requires further investigation beyond our scope. Such careful topological considerations will provide further insight on topological domain wall states in any artificial atomic chains.
Data availability
The data sets generated and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.
Code availability
The custom codes generated and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.
References
Huda, M. N., Kezilebieke, S., Ojanen, T., Drost, R. & Liljeroth, P. Tuneable topological domain wall states in engineered atomic chains. npj Quantum Mater. 5, 17 (2020).
Drost, R., Ojanen, T., Harju, A. & Liljeroth, P. Topological states in engineered atomic lattices. Nat. Phys. 13, 668–671 (2017).
Martinez Alvarez, V. M. & Coutinho-Filho, M. D. Edge states in trimer lattices. Phys. Rev. A 99, 013833 (2019).
Kim, T.-H. & Yeom, H. W. Topological solitons versus nonsolitonic phase defects in a quasi-one-dimensional charge-density Wave. Phys. Rev. Lett. 109, 246802 (2012).
Cheon, S., Kim, T.-H., Lee, S.-H. & Yeom, H. W. Chiral solitons in a coupled double Peierls chain. Science 350, 182–185 (2015).
Kim, T.-H., Cheon, S. & Yeom, H. W. Switching chiral solitons for algebraic operation of topological quaternary digits. Nat. Phys. 13, 444–447 (2017).
Han, S.-H., Jeong, S.-G., Kim, S.-W., Kim, T.-H. & Cheon, S. Topological features of ground states and topological solitons in generalized Su-Schrieffer-Heeger models using generalized time-reversal, particle-hole, and chiral symmetries. Phys. Rev. B 102, 235411 (2020).
Oh, C.-g, Han, S.-H., Jeong, S.-G., Kim, T.-H. & Cheon, S. Particle-antiparticle duality and fractionalization of topological chiral solitons. Sci. Rep. 11, 1013 (2021).
Blanco-Redondo, A. et al. Topological optical waveguiding in silicon and the transition between topological and trivial defect states. Phys. Rev. Lett. 116, 163901 (2016).
Su, W. P., Schrieffer, J. R. & Heeger, A. J. Soliton excitations in polyacetylene. Phys. Rev. B 22, 2099–2111 (1980).
González, C., Flores, F. & Ortega, J. Soft phonon, dynamical fluctuations, and a reversible phase transition: indium chains on silicon. Phys. Rev. Lett. 96, 136101 (2006).
Zak, J. Berry’s phase for energy bands in solids. Phys. Rev. Lett. 62, 2747–2750 (1989).
Su, W. P., Schrieffer, J. R. & Heeger, A. J. Solitons in polyacetylene. Phys. Rev. Lett. 42, 1698–1701 (1979).
Acknowledgements
We thank Ha-Eum Kim and Sangmo Cheon for useful discussions. This work was supported by the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) funded by the Ministry of Science and ICT, South Korea (Grants No. NRF-2021R1F1A1063263, 2021R1A6A1A10042944, and 2016K1A4A4A01922028).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
S.-G.J. and T.-H.K. conceived the idea, carried out the calculations and the analyses, and wrote the manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary information
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Jeong, SG., Kim, TH. Topological and trivial domain wall states in engineered atomic chains. npj Quantum Mater. 7, 22 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41535-022-00424-y
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41535-022-00424-y
This article is cited by
-
Emerging topological bound states in Haldane model zigzag nanoribbons
npj Quantum Materials (2024)