Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Linear and nonlinear optical responses in the chiral multifold semimetal RhSi

Abstract

Chiral topological semimetals are materials that break both inversion and mirror symmetries. They host interesting phenomena such as the quantized circular photogalvanic effect (CPGE) and the chiral magnetic effect. In this work, we report a comprehensive theoretical and experimental analysis of the linear and nonlinear optical responses of the chiral topological semimetal RhSi, which is known to host multifold fermions. We show that the characteristic features of the optical conductivity, which display two distinct quasi-linear regimes above and below 0.4 eV, can be linked to excitations of different kinds of multifold fermions. The characteristic features of the CPGE, which displays a sign change at 0.4 eV and a large non-quantized response peak of around 160 μA/V2 at 0.7 eV, are explained by assuming that the chemical potential crosses a flat hole band at the Brillouin zone center. Our theory predicts that, in order to observe a quantized CPGE in RhSi, it is necessary to increase the chemical potential as well as the quasiparticle lifetime. More broadly, our methodology, especially the development of the broadband terahertz emission spectroscopy, could be widely applied to study photogalvanic effects in noncentrosymmetric materials and in topological insulators in a contact-less way and accelerate the technological development of efficient infrared detectors based on topological semimetals.

Introduction

The robust and intrinsic electronic properties of topological metals—a class of quantum materials—can potentially protect or enhance useful electromagnetic responses1,2,3,4. However, direct and unambiguous detection of these properties is often challenging. For example, in Dirac semimetals such as Cd3As2 and Na3Bi5,6 two doubly degenerate bands cross linearly at a single point, the Dirac point, and this crossing is protected by rotational symmetry7,8,9. A Dirac point can be understood as two coincident topological crossings with equal but opposite topological charge4, and as a result, the topological contributions to the response to external probes cancel in this class of materials, rendering external probes insensitive to the topological charge.

Weyl semimetals may offer an alternative, as this class of topological metals is defined by the presence of isolated twofold topological band crossings, separated in momentum space from a partner crossing with opposite topological charge. This requires the breaking of either time-reversal or inversion symmetry. The Weyl semimetal phases discovered in materials of the transition monopnictide family such as TaAs10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17 lack inversion symmetry, which allows for nonzero second-order nonlinear optical responses and has motivated the search for topological responses using techniques of nonlinear optics. This search has resulted in the observation of giant second-harmonic generation (SHG)18,19, as well as interesting photogalvanic effects20,21,22,23,24. However, neither response can be directly attributed to the topological charge of a single band crossing, since mirror symmetry—present in most known Weyl semimetals—imposes that charges with opposite sign lie at the same energy and thus contribute equally19,25. This is similar for other types of Weyl semimetal materials, such as type-II Weyl semimetals26. Type-II Weyl semimetals display open Fermi surfaces to lowest order in momentum26,27,28,29,30,31,32, giving rise to remarkable photogalvanic effects33,34,35,36,37, but not directly linked to their topological charge.

Materials with even lower symmetry can hold the key to measuring the topological charge directly. Chiral topological metals do not possess any inversion or mirror symmetries38,39,40,41, and as a result, the topological band crossings do not only occur at different momenta but also at different energies, making them accessible to external probes. Notably, the circular photogalvanic effect (CPGE), i.e., the part of the photocurrent that reverses sign with the sense of polarization, was predicted to be quantized in chiral Weyl semimetals42. However, chiral Weyl semimetals with sizable Weyl node separations, such as SrSi243, have not been synthesized as single crystals.

Recently, a class of chiral single crystals has emerged as a promising venue for studying topological semimetallic behavior deriving from topological band crossings. Following a theoretical prediction38,39,40,41,44,45, experimental evidence provided proof that a family of silicides, including CoSi46,47,48 and RhSi46, hosts topological band crossings with nonzero topological charge at which more than two bands meet. Such band crossings, known as multifold nodes, may be viewed as generalizations of Weyl points and are enforced by crystal symmetries. These materials are good candidates to study signatures of topological excitations in optical conductivity measurements, as the Lifshitz energy that separates the topological from the trivial excitations is on the order of ~1 eV. In contrast, the Lifshitz energy in previous Dirac/Weyl semimetals such as Cd3As26, Na3Bi5 and TaAs10,11 is <100 meV.

The prediction of a quantized CPGE was extended to materials in this class, specifically to RhSi in space group 19844,49,50. These materials display a protected three-band crossing of topological charge 2, known as a threefold fermion at the zone center and a protected double Weyl node of opposite topological charge at the zone boundary. In RhSi, theory predicts that, <0.7 eV, only the Γ point is excited, resulting in a CPGE plateau when the chemical potential is above the threefold node44,49,50. Above 0.7 eV, the R point contribution of opposite charge compensates it, resulting in a vanishing CPGE at large frequencies44,49,50. The predicted energy dependence above 0.5 eV is qualitatively consistent with a recent experiment in RhSi performed within photon energies ranging between 0.5 and 1.1 eV51.

Despite this preliminary progress, the challenge to determine if and how quantization can be observed in practice in these materials has remained unanswered, largely since multiple effects such as the quadratic correction49,50 and short hot-carrier lifetime42,52 can conspire to destroy it. Furthermore, thus far, the experimental signatures of the existence of multifold fermions have been limited to band structure measurements46,47,48. A comprehensive understanding of the linear53 and nonlinear optical responses51, targeting the energy range where the multifold fermions dominate optical transitions and transport signatures, is still lacking.

In this work, we report the measurement of the linear and nonlinear response of RhSi, analyzed using different theoretical models of increasing complexity, and provide a consistent picture of (i) the way in which multifold fermions manifest in optical responses, and (ii) how quantization can be observed. We performed optical conductivity measurements from 0.004 to 6 eV and 10 to 300 K, as well as terahertz (THz) emission spectroscopy with incident photon energy from 0.2 eV to 1.1 eV at 300 K. Our optical conductivity measurements, combined with tight-binding and ab initio calculations, show that interband transitions 0.4 eV are mainly dominated by the vertical transitions near the multifold nodes at the Brillouin zone center, the Γ point. We found that the transport lifetime is relatively short in RhSi, ≤13 fs at 300 K and ≤23 fs at 10 K. The measured CPGE response shows a sign change and no clear plateau. Our optical conductivity and CPGE experiments are reasonably well reproduced by tight-binding and first-principle calculations when the chemical potential lies below the threefold node at the Γ point, crossing a relatively flat band, and when the hot-carrier lifetime is chosen to be ≈4–7 fs. We argue that these observations are behind the absence of quantization. Our ab initio calculation predicts that a quantized CPGE could be observed by increasing the electronic doping by 100 meV with respect to the chemical potential in the current generation of samples46,51,53, if it is accompanied by an improvement in the sample quality that can significantly increase the hot-carrier lifetime.

Results and discussion

Optical conductivity measurement

The measured frequency-dependent reflectivity R(ω) by a Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) spectrometer (see “Methods”) is shown in Fig. 1a in the frequency range from 0 to 8000 cm−1 for several selected temperatures. (1 meV corresponds to 8.06 cm−1 and 0.24 THz.) R(ω) at room temperature is shown over a much larger range up to 50,000 cm−1 in the inset. In the low-frequency range, R(ω) is rather high and has a \(R=1-A\sqrt{\omega }\) response characteristic of a metal in the Hagen–Rubens regime. Around 2000 cm−1, a temperature-independent plasma frequency is observed in the reflectivity. For ω > 8000 cm−1, the reflectivity is approximately temperature independent.

Fig. 1: Optical conductivity and Hall resistivity of RhSi.
figure1

a Temperature dependence of the reflectivity spectra up to 8000 cm−1 of RhSi. Inset shows the room temperature spectrum up to 50,000 cm−1. b Temperature dependence of the real part of the dielectric function ε1(ω). Inset shows screened plasma frequency of free carriers obtained from the zero crossings of ε1(ω). c Optical conductivity of RhSi up to 8000 cm−1 at different temperatures. Inset: Optical conductivity shown up to 50,000 cm−1 at room temperature. d Hall resistivity of RhSi at 10 and 300 K.

The results of the Kramers–Kronig analysis of R(ω) are shown in Fig. 1b, c in terms of the real part of the dielectric function ε1(ω) and the real part of optical conductivity σ1(ω). At low frequencies, ε1(ω) is negative, a defining property of a metal. With increasing photon energy ω, ε1(ω) crosses zero around 1600 cm−1 and reaches values up to 33 around 4000 cm−1. The crossing point, where ε1(ω) = 0, is related to the screened plasma frequency \({\omega }_{{\rm{p}}}^{{\rm{scr}}}\) of free carriers. As shown by the inset of Fig. 1b, \({\omega }_{{\rm{p}}}^{{\rm{scr}}}\) is almost temperature independent. Similar temperature dependence and values of \({\omega }_{p}^{scr}\) have been recently reported in another work for RhSi53, indicating similar large carrier densities and small transport lifetime in RhSi samples.

Figure 1c shows the temperature dependence of σ1(ω) for RhSi. Overall, σ1(ω) is dominated by a narrow Dude-like peak in the far-infrared region, followed by a relatively flat tail in the frequency region between 1000 and 3500 cm−1. As the temperature decreases, the Drude-like peak narrows with a concomitant increase of the low-frequency optical conductivity. In addition, the inset shows the σ1(ω) spectrum at room temperature over the entire measurement range, in which the high-frequency σ1(ω) is dominated by two interband transition peaks around 8000 and 20,000 cm−1.

To perform a quantitative analysis of the optical data at low frequencies, we fit the σ1(ω) spectra with a Drude–Lorentz model

$${\sigma }_{1}(\omega )=\frac{2\pi }{{Z}_{0}}\left[{\sum\limits_{j}}\frac{{\Omega }_{{\rm{pD}},j}^{2}}{{\omega }^{2}{\tau }_{{\rm{D}},j}+\frac{1}{{\tau }_{{\rm{D}},j}}}+{\sum\limits_{k}}\frac{{\gamma }_{k}{\omega }^{2}{S}_{k}^{2}}{{({\omega }_{0,k}^{2}-{\omega }^{2})}^{2}+{\gamma }_{k}^{2}{\omega }^{2}}\right],$$
(1)

where Z0 is the vacuum impedance. The first sum of Drude terms describes the response of the itinerant carriers in the different bands that are crossing the Fermi level, each characterized by a plasma frequency ΩpD,j and a transport scattering rate (Drude peak width) 1/τD,j. The second term contains a sum of Lorentz oscillators, each with a different resonance frequency ω0,k, a line width γk, and an oscillator strength Sk. The corresponding fit to the conductivity at 10 K (thick blue line) using the function of Eq. (1) (red line) is shown in Fig. 2a up to 12,000 cm−1. As shown by the thin colored lines, the fitting curve is composed of two Drude terms with small and large transport scattering rates, respectively, and several Lorentz terms that account for the phonons at low energy and the interband transitions at higher energy. Fits of the σ1(ω) curves at all the measured temperatures return the temperature dependence of the fitting parameters. Figure 2b shows the temperature dependence of the plasma frequencies Ωp,D of the two Drude terms, which remain constant within the error bar of the measurement, indicating that the band structure hardly changes with temperature. Figure 2c displays the temperature dependence of the corresponding transport scattering rates 1/τD of the two Drude terms. The transport scattering rate of the broad Drude term remains temperature independent, while that of the narrow Drude decreases at low temperature. Note that the temperature dependence of the Drude responses appears to be slightly stronger than in ref. 53 probably due to a slightly better crystal quality in our studies.

Fig. 2: Drude and interband optical responses in RhSi.
figure2

a Optical conductivity spectrum of RhSi up to 12,000 cm−1 (1.5 eV) at 10 K. The thin red line through the data is the Drude–Lorentz fitting result, which consists of the contributions from a narrow Drude peak (green line), a broad Drude peak (orange line), and several Lorentz terms that accounts for the phonons (gray) and the interband transitions (light blue, magenta, and wine lines). Temperature dependence of b the plasma frequency Ωp,D and c the transport scattering rate 1/τD of the Drude terms. d Optical conductivity spectrum of RhSi at 10 K, and the corresponding spectrum after the Drude response and the sharp phonon modes have been subtracted. Black dashed lines are eye guidance for different quasi-linear regimes.

The need for two Drude terms indicates that RhSi has two types of charge carriers with very different transport scattering rates. Such a two Drude fit is often used to describe the optical response of multiband systems. Prominent examples of such multiband materials are the iron-based superconductors54,55,56. As we discuss below, in the case of RhSi two main pockets are expected to cross the Fermi level, centered around the Γ (heavy hole pocket) and the R point (electron pocket)44,45. (See the band structure in Fig. 3.) Note that there might be a small hole pocket at the M point as well. Accordingly, the two Drude fit can most likely be assigned to the intraband response around the Γ (broad Drude term) and R (narrow Drude term) points of the Brillouin zone because the effective mass of the holes from the flat bands at Γ is much heavier than the electrons at R. This is further supported by the observation of dominant electron contribution in Hall resistivity measurement on a typical RhSi sample, which is linear as a function of magnetic field up to 9 T, as shown in Fig. 1d. A third Drude peak for the pocket at M could be included but its contribution must be very small as the two pockets at Γ and R are much larger. Note that the two Drude terms could also come from two scattering processes with different scattering rates53. We use the transport lifetime of the narrow Drude peak as the upper bound and estimate that transport lifetime is ≤13 fs at 300 K and ≤23 fs at 10 K, consistent with previous studies51,53.

Fig. 3: DFT band structure of RhSi.
figure3

DFT band structure of RhSi a without spin–orbit coupling and b with spin–orbit coupling. It hosts a threefold fermion at Γ and a fourfold double Weyl fermion at R without spin orbit coupling. They split into a spin-3/2 node and a Weyl node at Γ, and a sixfold double spin-1 node and a twofold Kramers node at R, when spin–orbit coupling is included.

Having examined the evolution of the two Drude response with temperature, we next investigate the σ1(ω) spectrum associated with interband transitions. To single out this contribution, we show in Fig. 2d the σ1(ω) spectra, after subtracting the two Drude response and the sharp phonon modes. With the subtraction of two Drude peaks with transport scattering rates of 200 and 2400 cm−1 (Drude fit 1 in Fig. 2d), we reveal a quasi-linear behavior of σ1(ω) in the low-frequency regime (up to about 3500 cm−1). Such behavior is a strong indication for the presence of three-dimensional linearly dispersing bands near the Fermi level57. Indeed, from band structure calculations (see Fig. 3), we see that this low-energy quasi-linear interband conductivity (ω < 3500 cm−1) could be attributed to the interband transitions around the Γ point. At higher energy, the interband contributions around the R point become allowed and can be responsible for the second quasi-linear interband conductivity region (3500 cm−1 < ω < 6500 cm−1). At ω > 6500 cm−1, the optical conductivity flattens and forms a broad maximum around 8000 cm−1. From Fig. 2a, we see that this maximum is a consequence of the Lorentzian peak around 0.85 eV (light blue) and around 1.1 eV (magenta). As analyzed by density functional theory (DFT) below, the peak around 0.85 eV is most likely attributed to broadened interband transitions centered at the M point, which was previously systematically studied in CoSi58. See more discussion in the calculation below. Note that our interpretation of the peak is different from ref. 53.

Before analyzing these further, it is important to note that the fit to the broader Drude peak might suffer from more uncertainty than that of the narrow Drude peak. Small changes in its width might result in appreciable changes when subtracting it from the full data set to obtain the interband response. Here we use a different method, which does not make use of Drude–Lorentz fits since the low-frequency tails of Lorentzian terms might also look quasi-linear. Instead, we fit and then subtract the two Drude and two phonon terms directly. By subtracting the broad Drude peak this time with a smaller transport scatter rate of 1350 cm−1 (Drude fit 2 in Fig. 2d), the onset frequency at which the interband conductivity emerges decreases and the magnitude of σ1 <4000 cm−1 increases, with respect to the Drude fit 1. However, the resulting slope <3500 cm−1 is not significantly modified as the wide Drude response contributes as a flat background in this regime. Note that another recent study used a similar method and also found that the quasi-linear behavior is robust within the uncertainty of the fit parameters53. Therefore, we conclude that the low-frequency quasi-linear conductivity is contributed from interband excitations and will be analyzed next in our theoretical modeling.

Optical conductivity calculation

To gain insight into the low-frequency interband optical conductivity of RhSi, we now put these predictions to the test based on a low-energy linearized model around the Γ point, a four-band tight-binding model, and ab initio calculations (see “Methods”).

We start from simpler linear and tight-binding models to explain the two low-energy quasi-linear behavior. The band structure of RhSi calculated using DFT is shown in Fig. 3. The band structure calculations of Fig. 3 suggest that, at low frequencies, ω 0.4 eV, the optical conductivity is dominated by interband transitions close to the Γ point as the R point is 0.4 eV below the chemical potential. To linear order in momentum, the middle band at Γ is flat (see Fig. 3a), and the only parameter is the Fermi velocity of the upper and lower dispersing bands vF. The optical conductivity of a threefold fermion is \({\sigma }_{1}^{{\rm{3f}}}={e}^{2}\omega /(12\pi \hbar {v}_{{\rm{F}}})\)57 and is plotted in Fig. 4b (solid gray line). We observe that the low energy \({\sigma }_{1}^{{\rm{3f}}}\) shows a smaller average slope compared to the low-energy part of our experimental data. In addition, a purely linear conductivity is insufficient to describe a small shoulder at around 200 meV (see a more zoomed-in data in Fig. 5b compared to the linear guide to the eye).

Fig. 4: Four-band model.
figure4

a Band structure obtained using a tight-binding model for RhSi without spin–orbit coupling. b Optical conductivity of RhSi for different chemical potentials μ without disorder broadening. The \({\sigma }_{1}^{{\rm{3f}}}\) conductivity by low-energy linear model is shown as a solid gray line. c Optical conductivity of RhSi calculated with different disorder-related broadenings, η, for μ = −100 meV (see b) using Eq. (4). The solid green curve has the same parameters (μ = −100 meV, η = 100 meV) as the tight-binding CPGE calculation (orange curve in Fig. 6c).

Fig. 5: Calculated optical conductivity by DFT.
figure5

a Full frequency-range optical conductivity comparing different broadening factors η, with fixed μ = −30 meV. The η = 100 meV curve shows a relatively good agreement up to 4 eV. b Low-energy optical conductivity data compared to DFT results calculated at different chemical potentials μ and a disorder broadening η = 100 meV. The black dashed line is a guide to the eye, highlighting the small deviations from linearity and a small shoulder in the data around 200 meV.

The position of the chemical potential in Fig. 3 indicates that the deviations from linearity of the central band at Γ can play a significant role in optical transitions. To include them, we use a four-band tight-binding lattice model that incorporates the lattice symmetries of space group 19844,49. The resulting tight-binding band structure is shown in Fig. 4a by following the method developed in ref. 49 (see “Methods”). In Fig. 4b, we compare the tight-binding model with different chemical potentials indicated in Fig. 4a and the experimental optical conductivity in the interval \(\hbar\)ω [0, 0.7] eV (sub. Drude fit 2), as the extrapolation is expected to go through zero57. By choosing different chemical potentials below and above the node without yet including a hot-carrier scattering time τ, we observe that if the chemical potential is below the threefold node (see μ = 0, −100 meV curves in Fig. 4b), a peak appears (around 200 meV for μ = −100 meV), followed by a dip in the optical conductivity at larger frequencies, before the activation of the transitions centered at the R point.

The peak-dip feature observed in the optical conductivity can be traced back to the allowed optical transitions and the curvature of the middle band. When the Fermi level lies below the node, the interband transitions with the lowest activation frequency connect the lower to the middle threefold band at Γ. Increasing the frequency could activate transitions between the bottom and upper threefold bands, allowed by quadratic corrections, but these are largely suppressed due to the selection rules as the change of angular momentum between these bands is 257. Because of the curvature of the middle band, the transitions connecting the lower and the middle threefold bands die out as frequency is increased further, resulting in the peak-dip structure visible in Fig. 4b. Since the curvature of the middle band is absent by construction in the linear model but captured by the tight-binding model, it is only the latter model that shows a conductivity peak-dip. As a side remark, we observe that the transitions involving the R point bands activate at lower frequencies as the chemical potential is decreased.

Although placing the chemical potential below the Γ node results in a marked peak around 0.2 eV, it is clearly sharper and overshoots compared to the data, for which the sudden drop at frequencies above the peak is also absent. It is likely that this drop is masked by the finite and relatively larger disorder related broadening η = \(\hbar\)/τ. This scale is expected to be large for RhSi given the broad nature of the low-energy Drude peak width in Eq. (4). Note that τ is the hot-carrier lifetime, which is different from the transport lifetime τD estimated from the Drude peaks. In Fig. 4c, we compare different hot-carrier scattering times for μ = −100 meV. Upon increasing η, the sharp features in Fig. 4b are broadened, turning the sharp peak into a shoulder, which was observed in the experimental data. When η = 100–150 meV, the resulting optical conductivity falls close to our experimental data, including the upturn at 0.4 eV, associated with the activation of the broadened transitions around the R point, which agrees with the experimental data. Note that the large disorder scale is similar to the spin–orbit coupling (≈100 meV) and therefore washes out any feature narrower than 100 meV and justifies our discussion based on a tight-binding model without spin–orbit coupling.

We note that, despite the general agreement <0.5 eV, the intuitive tight-binding calculations deviate from the data >0.5 eV. This is likely due to the tight-binding model’s known limitations, which fails to accurately capture the band structure curvature and orbital character at other high-symmetry points such as the M point, which is a saddle point. These limitations will also play a role in our discussion of the CPGE.

To refine our understanding of these aspects and to further examine the role of spin–orbit coupling, we have used the DFT method to calculate the optical conductivity, including spin–orbit coupling on a wider frequency range up to \(\hbar\)ω = 4 eV (see “Methods”). The optical conductivity we obtained is compared to our data in Fig. 5a for a wide range of frequencies, and in Fig. 5b within a low-energy frequency window. The smaller broadening factors, η = 10, 50 meV, reveal fine features due to spin–orbit coupling such as the peaks at low energies, due to the spin–orbit splitting of the Γ and R points (see Fig. 3b). These features are absent in the data as they are smoothened as the broadening is increased (see Fig. 5a), consistent with the tight-binding model discussion above. As shown in Fig. 5b, the low-energy conductivity <0.2 eV is better explained if the chemical potential is at −30 meV. The dip at around 0.5 eV, seen in Fig. 5b for low broadening, is filled with spectral weight as broadening is increased, consistent with our tight-binding calculations. Note that the DFT calculation underestimates the conductivity in the range of 0.2–0.4 eV, which is probably because the contribution of surface arcs is not considered59.

At higher energies, the DFT calculation recovers a peak at \(\hbar\)ω ≈ 1 eV, seen also in our data (see Fig. 5a). If the broadening is small (η = 10 meV), the peak is sharper compared to the measurement and exhibits a double feature with a shoulder around 0.85 eV and a sharp peak around 1.08 eV. Although smoothened by disorder, this double feature is consistent with the need of two Lorentzian functions (Lorentz 1 and Lorentz 2 in Fig. 2a) to model this peak phenomenologically with Eq. (1). Figure 3b shows that the excitation energy at the M point is around 0.7 eV. In a recent work on CoSi, in the same space group 198 as RhSi, a momentum-resolved study shows that the dominant contribution of this Lorentzian function (Lorentz 1) arises from the saddle point at M58. The peaks around 1.1 and 2.5 eV could arise from other saddle points with a gap size larger than that at the M point.

Overall, the curves with broadening factor η = 100 meV and with chemical potential below the nodes at Γ in both the tight-binding and DFT calculations show a good qualitative agreement with the experimentally measured curve in a wide frequency range. This observation determines approximately the hot-carrier lifetime in RhSi to be τ = \(\hbar\)/η ≈ 6.6 fs.

CPGE measurement

As a first step of the CPGE experiment, we determined the high symmetry axes, [0, 0, 1] and [1, −1, 0] directions of the RhSi (110) sample (see Fig. 6a), respectively, by SHG. To stimulate SHG, pulses of 800-nm wavelength were focused at near-normal incidence to a spot with a 10-μm diameter on the (110) facet18. Figure 6b shows the polar patterns of SHG as a function of the polarization of the linear light in the co-rotating parallel-polarizer (red) and crossed-polarizer (blue) configurations18,19. The solid lines are the fit constrained by the point group symmetry with only one non-zero term \({\chi }_{xyz}^{(2)}\) and the angle dependence of the SHG are:

$${I}_{{\rm{parallel}}}(\theta )=36| {\chi }_{xyz}^{(2)}{| }^{2}{\cos }^{4}\theta {\sin }^{2}\theta ,$$
(2)
$${I}_{{\rm{cross}}}({\theta }_{1})=4| {\chi }_{xyz}^{(2)}{| }^{2}{(2\cos \theta {\sin }^{2}\theta -{\cos }^{3}\theta )}^{2}$$
(3)
Fig. 6: CPGE measurement and calculation.
figure6

a Crystal structure of RhSi. b Second-harmonic generation measured on the (110) surface of RhSi crystal at near-normal incidence. Solid red and blue lines are the best fit of the experiment data. Open circles are data measured in the parallel- and crossed-polarizer geometry. c A schematic representation of the experimental geometry for the THz emission spectroscopy. d Detected emitted THz pulses in the incident plane from RhSi at the 45-degree incidence of left-handed and right-handed circularly polarized light at the photon energy of 0.425 eV. e Experimental CPGE spectrum of RhSi (blue squares) compared to first-principles at μ = −30 meV and T = 300 K and tight-binding calculations. Both calculations use a broadening η = 100 meV. f First-principles calculation of the trace of the CPGE components in units of the quantization constant β0 = πe3/h2 with spin–orbit coupling at different chemical potential μ from the zero energy defined in Fig. 3a, b at T = 0 K, and a broadening parameter η = 10 meV. While μ = 0 and −30 meV sit below the Γ threefold node (see Fig. 3a, b), the two remaining chemical potentials lie above the Γ node. gi Momentum-resolved contribution of the CPGE photocurrent at 0.4, 0.6, and 0.75 eV for the green curve in e. The contribution is shown by the red–blue color scale, with red being positive and blue being negative.

where θ is the angle between the polarization of the incident light and the [1, −1, 0] axis.

Next, we perform THz emission spectroscopy to measure the longitudinal CPGE in RhSi (see “Methods”). As shown in Fig. 6c, an ultrafast circularly polarized laser pulse is incident on the sample at 45 degrees to generate a transient photocurrent. Due to the longitudinal direction of the CPGE, the transient current flows along the light propagation direction inside RhSi and therefore in the incident plane42,44,49. The THz electric fields radiated by the time-dependent photocurrent is collected and measured by a standard electro-optical sampling method with a ZnTe detector60. The component in the incident plane is measured by placing a THz wire-grid polarizer before the detector. Figure 6d shows a typical response of the component of emitted THz pulses in the incident plane under left-handed and right-handed circularly polarized light at an incident energy of 0.425 eV. The nearly opposite curves demonstrate the dominating CPGE contribution to the photocurrent with an almost vanishing linear photogalvanic effect at this incident energy. The CPGE contribution can be extracted by taking the difference between the two emitted THz pulses under circularly polarized light with opposite helicity. During our measurement, the [001] axis is kept horizontally in the laboratory, even though the CPGE signal does not depend on the crystal orientation due to the cubic crystalline structure.

In order to measure the amplitude of the CPGE photocurrent, we use a motorized delay stage to move a standard candle ZnTe at the same position to perform the THz emission experiment right after measuring RhSi for every photon energy between 0.2 to 1.1 eV61. ZnTe is a good benchmark due to its relatively flat frequency dependence on the electric–optical sampling coefficient for photon energy below the gap62,63. The use of ZnTe circumvents assumptions regarding the incident pulse length, the wavelength dependent focus spot size on the sample, and the calculation of collection efficiency of the off-axis parabolic mirrors61,64. The details of the derivation can be found in ref. 64 and this method was previously used in the shift current measurement on a ferroelectric insulator61. A spectrum of CPGE photoconductivity as a function of incident photon energy is shown in Fig. 6e in units of μA/V2 (squares). Upon decreasing the incident photon energy from 1.1 to 0.7 eV, we observe a rapid increase of CPGE response with a peak value of 163 (±19) μA/V2 at 0.7 eV. The features of this line resemble those observed in ref. 51. Further decreasing the photon energy from 0.7 to 0.2 eV, the CPGE conductivity displays a sharp drop with a striking sign change at 0.4 eV, which was not seen before as the lowest photon energy measured in a previous study was around 0.5 eV51. Interestingly, the peak photoconductivity at 0.7 eV is much larger than the photogalvanic effect in BaTiO365, single-layer monochalcogenides65,66, and other chiral crystals67, and it is comparable to the colossal bulk-photovoltaic response in TaAs22. It is also one order of magnitude larger than the previous study on RhSi51 probably due to a larger hot-carrier lifetime. Interestingly, the sign change at 0.4 eV was not predicted in previous theory studies either44,49,50. The quantized CPGE below 0.7 eV predicted in RhSi in previous theory studies44,49,50 is absent in the experiment. Note that CPGE from the surface Fermi arcs, which might exist below 0.5 eV on the (110) facet, is generally one order of magnitude smaller than the bulk contribution. It is better to be detected under normal incidence and therefore not the focus of this work59.

CPGE calculation

In order to understand the absence of quantized CPGE and the origin of the sign change in our CPGE data, we have calculated the CPGE response, βij, using a first-principle calculation via FPLO (full-potential local-orbital minimum-basis) as DFT captures the curvature of the flat bands at Γ and the saddle point M68,69 (see Methods). Due to cubic symmetry, the only finite CPGE component is βxx49. In our convention, the tensor βij determines the photocurrent rate. When the hot-carrier lifetime τ is short compared to the pulse width, the total photocurrent is given by βxxτ50. βxx is directly calculated from the band structure at μ = −30 meV and we assume a constant τ as a function of energy. τ is the only fitting parameter to match both the peak and width in the CPGE current.

In Fig. 6e, we plot βxxτ, with the hot-carrier scattering time corresponding to a broadening η = \(\hbar\)/τ = 100 meV (τ ≈ 6.6 fs) calculated using the DFT (μ = −30 meV, T = 300 K). The DFT calculation captures quantitatively the features seen in the CPGE data: the existence of a peak around 0.7 eV, its width, and the sign change of the response. Together they support the conclusion that the chemical potential lies below the Γ node (see Fig. 3), consistent with the features of the optical conductivity. Figure 6g–i shows the momentum-resolved contribution to the CPGE current at different incident photon energies. Below 0.6 eV, the main contributions are centered around the R and Γ points with opposite signs while the M point is turned on at 0.75 eV. The sign change at 0.4 eV is due to the turn on of the excitations at R with an opposite sign in βxx, which was also derived in a simpler kp model recently64. Note that, at 0.4 eV, the R point already contributes to the CPGE due to the large broadening ~100 meV in this material. The certain remaining differences between the data and the calculations suggests that a constant, energy independent hot-carrier scattering time τ might be an oversimplified phenomenological model for the disorder. In general, the hot-carrier scattering time is energy and momentum dependent52 and including these effects might give even better agreement.

It is illustrative to compare these results, especially the striking sign change, with a four-band tight-binding calculations for the CPGE as the latter is the simplest model to capture both the multifold fermions at the Γ and R points. Following ref. 49, we computed the CPGE with parameters η = 100 meV and μ = −100 meV (Fig. 6e, orange line), which match the optical conductivity (see Fig. 4c, solid line), but it underestimates the position of the peak and the overall magnitude of the CPGE. This is mainly attributed to the failure of the tight binding to capture the M point. However, it shows the overall peak-dip structure of the response and its sign change around 0.4 eV, which is contributed from the negative chemical potential at Γ. By lowering the chemical potential, the tight-binding result can be made to match the data, paying the price that the optical conductivity will no longer be reproduced.

We end by discussing the possibility of observing a quantized CPGE in this sample. In Fig. 6f, we show the effect of changing the chemical potential on the DFT calculated CPGE tensor trace \(\beta ={\rm{Tr}}[{\beta }_{ij}]=3{\beta }_{xx}\) in units of the quantization constant β0 = πe3/h2. For an ideal multifold fermion with linear dispersion, and taking into account spin-degeneracy, the CPGE is expected to be quantized to a Chern number of four, as β = 4iβ0, corresponding to the total charge of the nodes at Γ49, C = 4. A finer analysis and DFT calculations49,50 indicates that, unlike in the case of Weyl nodes, quadratic corrections can spoil quantization beyond the linear dispersion regime in multifold fermion materials. Upon decreasing the broadening to 10 meV and changing the Fermi level by 100 meV compared to the chemical potential found in our DFT calculations, a narrow frequency window around 0.6 eV emerges with a close-to-quantized value, shown as purple line in Fig. 6f. We note that, when the chemical potential is above the nodes, there is no sign change below 0.7 eV.

In conclusion, we have established a consistent picture of the optical transitions in RhSi using a broad set of theoretical models applied to interpret the linear and nonlinear optical responses. Our data are explained if the chemical potential crosses a large hole-like band at Γ and with a relatively short hot-carrier lifetime ≈4.4–6.6 fs. The combined analysis of both linear and nonlinear responses illustrates the crucial role played by the curvature of the flat band at the Γ point and the saddle point at M.

Interband optical conductivity shows two quasi-linear regions where the conductivity increases smoothly with frequency and a slope change around 0.4 eV. The slope in the first region is determined by a disorder-broadened contribution associated with a threefold fermion at the Γ point. The slope in the second region is determined by the onset of a broadened R point conductivity.

The CPGE exhibits a sign change close to \(\hbar\)ω ~ 0.4 eV and a non-quantized peak at ≈0.7 eV. The magnitude of the CPGE response is approximately captured by our DFT calculations for a wide range of frequencies. Lastly, our calculations suggest that by electron-doping RhSi by ≈100 meV, a close-to-quantized value could be observed in a narrow energy window around 0.6 eV, if the hot-carrier scattering time is significantly increased. To realize the quantized CPGE, it would be also desirable to identify a material candidate with smaller spin–orbit coupling than RhSi64,70.

Our systematic methodology can be applied to other noncentrosymmetric topological materials40,41 to reveal signature of topological excitations. We observed THz emission in the mid-infrared regime (0.2–0.5 eV). We expect that the development of broadband THz emission spectroscopy provides the opportunity to reveal bulk photovoltanic23,24,61 and spintronic responses71 in a low-energy regime and also the possibility of probing Berry curvature in surface-state photogalvanic effect in topological insulators72.

Methods

Crystal growth

The high-quality single crystal of RhSi was grown by the Bridgeman method46. A 2 mm × 5 mm large RhSi with a (110) facet is used in this study.

Optical conductivity measurement

The in-plane reflectivity R(ω) was measured at a near-normal angle of incidence using a Bruker VERTEX 70v FTIR spectrometer with an in situ gold overfilling technique73. Data from 30 to 12,000 cm−1 (4 meV–1.5 eV) were collected at different temperatures from 10 to 300 K with a ARS-Helitran cryostat. The optical response function in the near-infrared to the ultraviolet range (4000–50,000 cm−1) was extended by a commercial ellipsometer (Woollam VASE) in order to obtain more accurate results for the Kramers–Kronig analysis of R(ω)74. The beam is focused down to 2 mm and not polarized as the conductivity is isotropic due to cubic symmetry.

THz emission experiment

The THz emission experiment is performed at dry air environment with relative humidity <3% at room temperature. An ultrafast laser pulse is incident on the sample at 45 degrees to the surface normal and is focused down to 1 mm2 to induce THz emission. The THz pulse is focused by a pair of 3-inch off-axis parabolic mirrors on the ZnTe (110) detector. The temporal THz electric field can be directly measured with a gated probe pulse of 1.55 eV and 35 fs duration60. The polarization of incident light is controlled by either a near-infrared achromatic or a mid-infrared quarter-wave plate. A wire-grid THz polarizer is utilized to pick out the THz electric field component in the incident plane. The photon energy of the incident light is tunable from 0.2 to 1.1 eV by an optical parametric amplifier and difference frequency generation. Pulse energy of 12 μJ is used for 0.4–1.1 eV and 6 μJ is used for 0.2–-0.4 eV. The repetition rate of the laser used is 1 kHz.

Four-band tight-binding model

In the main text, we use a four-band tight-binding model introduced in ref. 44 and further expanded in ref. 49. Since this model has been extensively studied before, we briefly review its main features relevant to this work. Our notation and the model is detailed in appendix F of ref. 57.

Without spin–orbit coupling, the four-band tight-binding model is determined by three material-dependent parameters, v1, vp, and v2. By fitting the band structure in Fig. 3b, we set v1 = 1.95, vp = 0.77, and v2 = 0.4. Our DFT fits deliver parameters that differ from those obtained in ref. 44, subsequently used in ref. 57. Our current parameters result in a better agreement to the observed optical conductivity and CPGE data. Additionally, we rigidly shift the zero of energies of the tight-binding model by 0.78 meV with respect to ref. 57 to facilitate comparison with the DFT calculation. As described in ref. 49, we additionally incorporate the orbital embedding in this model, which takes into account the position of the atoms in the unit cell. It amounts to a unitary transformation of the Hamiltonian, which depends on the atomic coordinates through a material-dependent parameter x, where xRhSi = 0.3959 for RhSi49,57.

Details of the optical conductivity calculations

Since RhSi crystallizes in a cubic lattice, it is sufficient to calculate one component of the real part of the longitudinal optical conductivity, σ1(ω), given by the expression75

$${\sigma }_{1}(\omega )=-\frac{\pi {e}^{2}\hbar }{V}{\sum\limits_{{\bf{k}},m\ne n}}\frac{\hbar \omega {f}_{nm}}{{\epsilon }_{nm}^{2}}| {v}_{nm}^{x}{| }^{2}{{\mathcal{L}}}_{\tau }({\epsilon }_{nm}-\hbar \omega ),$$
(4)

defined for a system of volume V described by a Hamiltonian H with eigenvalues and eigenvectors ϵn and \(\left|n\right\rangle\), respectively, and a velocity matrix element \({v}_{nm}^{x}=\frac{1}{\hbar }\left\langle n\right|{\partial }_{{k}_{i}}H\left|m\right\rangle\). The chemical potential μ and temperature T enter through the difference in Fermi functions fnm = fn − fm, and we define ϵnm = ϵn − ϵm. We have replaced the sharp Dirac delta function that governs the allowed transitions by a Lorentzian distribution \({{\mathcal{L}}}_{\tau }(\omega )=\frac{1}{\pi }\frac{\eta }{{\omega }^{2}+{\eta }^{2}}\) to phenomenologically incorporate disorder with a constant hot-carrier scattering time τ = \(\hbar\)/η.

The DFT calculations of the optical conductivity are also performed via Eq. (4), with the ab initio tight-binding Hamiltonian constructed from DFT calculations. We use a dense 300 × 300 × 300 momentum grid for the small broadening factor η = 10 meV and a 200 × 200 × 200 momentum grid for broadenings η ≥ 50 meV.

Details of the CPGE calculations

For our ab initio CPGE calculations, we projected the ab initio DFT Bloch wave function into atomic orbital-like Wannier functions76. To ensure the accuracy of the Wannier projection, we have included the outermost d, s, and p orbitals for transition metals (4d, 5s, and 5p orbitals for Rh) and the outermost s and p orbitals for main-group elements. Based on the highly symmetric Wannier functions, we constructed an effective tight-binding model Hamiltonian and calculated the CPGE evaluating50,75

$$\begin{array}{lll}{\beta }_{ab}(\omega )\,=\,\frac{i\pi {e}^{3}}{4\hbar }{\int}_{{\rm{BZ}}}\frac{d{\bf{k}}}{{(2\pi )}^{3}}{\sum\limits_{n> m}}{f}_{nm}{\epsilon }^{bcd}\\ \qquad\quad\,\times \,{\Delta }_{mn}^{a}{\rm{Im}}[{r}_{nm}^{d}{r}_{mn}^{c}]{{\mathcal{L}}}_{\tau }({\epsilon }_{nm}-\hbar \omega ),\end{array}$$
(5)

using a dense 480 × 480 × 480 momentum grid. Here \({\Delta }_{mn}^{a}\equiv {\partial }_{{k}_{a}}{\epsilon }_{mn}/\hbar\) and \({r}_{mn}^{a}\equiv i\langle m| {\partial }_{{k}_{a}}n\rangle ={v}_{nm}/i{\epsilon }_{nm}\) is the interband transition matrix element or off-diagonal Berry connection. As for the optical conductivity, the chemical potential and temperature are considered via the Fermi–Dirac distribution fn, and the Lorentzian function \({{\mathcal{L}}}_{\tau }(\omega )\) accounts for a finite hot-carrier scattering time.

Data availability

All data needed to evaluate the conclusions are present in the paper. Additional data related to this paper could be requested from the authors.

References

  1. 1.

    Murakami, S. Phase transition between the quantum spin Hall and insulator phases in 3D: emergence of a topological gapless phase. N. J. Phys. 9, 356 (2007).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Wan, X., Turner, A. M., Vishwanath, A. & Savrasov, S. Y. Topological semimetal and Fermi-arc surface states in the electronic structure of pyrochlore iridates. Phys. Rev. B 83, 205101 (2011).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Burkov, A. & Balents, L. Weyl semimetal in a topological insulator multilayer. Phys. Rev. Lett. 107, 127205 (2011).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Armitage, N., Mele, E. & Vishwanath, A. Weyl and Dirac semimetals in three-dimensional solids. Rev. Mod. Phys. 90, 015001 (2018).

    ADS  MathSciNet  Article  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Wang, Z. et al. Dirac semimetal and topological phase transitions in A3Bi (A= Na, K, Rb). Phys. Rev. B 85, 195320 (2012).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Wang, Z., Weng, H., Wu, Q., Dai, X. & Fang, Z. Three-dimensional Dirac semimetal and quantum transport in Cd3As2. Phys. Rev. B 88, 125427 (2013).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Liu, Z. et al. Discovery of a three-dimensional topological Dirac semimetal, Na3Bi. Science 343, 864–867 (2014).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Neupane, M. et al. Observation of a three-dimensional topological Dirac semimetal phase in high-mobility Cd3As2. Nat. Commun. 5, 3786 (2014).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Liu, Z. et al. A stable three-dimensional topological Dirac semimetal Cd3As2. Nat. Mater. 13, 677–681 (2014).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Weng, H., Fang, C., Fang, Z., Bernevig, B. A. & Dai, X. Weyl semimetal phase in noncentrosymmetric transition-metal monophosphides. Phys. Rev. X 5, 011029 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Huang, S.-M. et al. A Weyl Fermion semimetal with surface Fermi arcs in the transition metal monopnictide TaAs class. Nat. Commun. 6, 7373 (2015).

  12. 12.

    Xu, S.-Y. et al. Discovery of a Weyl fermion semimetal and topological Fermi arcs. Science 349, 613–617 (2015).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Lv, B. et al. Experimental discovery of Weyl semimetal TaAs. Phys. Rev. X 5, 031013 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Lv, B. et al. Observation of Weyl nodes in TaAs. Nat. Phys. 11, 724–727 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Xu, S.-Y. et al. Discovery of a Weyl fermion state with Fermi arcs in niobium arsenide. Nat. Phys. 11, 748–754 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Yang, L. et al. Weyl semimetal phase in the non-centrosymmetric compound TaAs. Nat. Phys. 11, 728–732 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Xu, N. et al. Observation of Weyl nodes and Fermi arcs in tantalum phosphide. Nat. Commun. 7, 11006 (2016).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Wu, L. et al. Giant anisotropic nonlinear optical response in transition metal monopnictide Weyl semimetals. Nat. Phys. 13, 350–355 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Patankar, S. et al. Resonance-enhanced optical nonlinearity in the Weyl semimetal TaAs. Phys. Rev. B 98, 165113 (2018).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Ma, Q. et al. Direct optical detection of Weyl fermion chirality in a topological semimetal. Nat. Phys. 13, 842–847 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Sun, K. et al. Circular photogalvanic effect in the Weyl semimetal TaAs. Chin. Phys. Lett. 34, 117203 (2017).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Osterhoudt, G. B. et al. Colossal mid-infrared bulk photovoltaic effect in a type-I Weyl semimetal. Nat. Mater. 18, 471–475 (2019).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Sirica, N. et al. Tracking ultrafast photocurrents in the Weyl semimetal TaAs using THz emission spectroscopy. Phys. Rev. Lett. 122, 197401 (2019).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Gao, Y. et al. Chiral terahertz wave emission from the Weyl semimetal TaAs. Nat. Commun. 11, 720 (2020).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Zhang, Y. et al. Photogalvanic effect in Weyl semimetals from first principles. Phys. Rev. B 97, 241118 (2018).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Soluyanov, A. A. et al. Type-II Weyl semimetals. Nature 527, 495–498 (2015).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Wang, Z. et al. MoTe2: a type-II Weyl topological metal. Phys. Rev. Lett. 117, 056805 (2016).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Chang, T.-R. et al. Prediction of an arc-tunable Weyl Fermion metallic state in MoxW1−xTe2. Nat. Commun. 7, 10639 (2016).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Huang, L. et al. Spectroscopic evidence for a type II Weyl semimetallic state in MoTe2. Nat. Mater. 15, 1155–1160 (2016).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Belopolski, I. et al. Discovery of a new type of topological Weyl fermion semimetal state in MoxW1−xTe2. Nat. Commun. 7, 13643 (2016).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Deng, K. et al. Experimental observation of topological Fermi arcs in type-II Weyl semimetal MoTe2. Nat. Phys. 12, 1105–1100 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Jiang, J. et al. Signature of type-II Weyl semimetal phase in MoTe2. Nat. Commun. 8, 13973 (2017).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Yang, X., Burch, K. & Ran, Y. Divergent bulk photovoltaic effect in Weyl semimetals. Preprintat https://arxiv.org/abs/1712.09363 (2017).

  34. 34.

    Lim, S., Rajamathi, C. R., Süß, V., Felser, C. & Kapitulnik, A. Temperature-induced inversion of the spin-photogalvanic effect in WTe2 and MoTe2. Phys. Rev. B 98, 121301 (2018).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    Ji, Z. et al. Spatially dispersive circular photogalvanic effect in a Weyl semimetal. Nat. Mater. 18, 955–962 (2019).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    Ma, J. et al. Nonlinear photoresponse of type-II Weyl semimetals. Nat. Mater. 18, 476–481 (2019).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  37. 37.

    Wang, Q. et al. Robust edge photocurrent response on layered type II Weyl semimetal WTe2. Nat. Commun. 10, 5736 (2019).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  38. 38.

    Mañes, J. L. Existence of bulk chiral fermions and crystal symmetry. Phys. Rev. B 85, 155118 (2012).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  39. 39.

    Wieder, B. J., Kim, Y., Rappe, A. & Kane, C. Double Dirac semimetals in three dimensions. Phys. Rev. Lett. 116, 186402 (2016).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  40. 40.

    Bradlyn, B. et al. Beyond Dirac and Weyl fermions: Unconventional quasiparticles in conventional crystals. Science 353, aaf5037 (2016).

    MathSciNet  MATH  Article  Google Scholar 

  41. 41.

    Chang, G. et al. Topological quantum properties of chiral crystals. Nat. Mater. 17, 978–985 (2018).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  42. 42.

    de Juan, F., Grushin, A. G., Morimoto, T. & Moore, J. E. Quantized circular photogalvanic effect in Weyl semimetals. Nat. Commun. 8, 15995 (2017).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  43. 43.

    Huang, S.-M. et al. New type of Weyl semimetal with quadratic double Weyl fermions. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 113, 1180–1185 (2016).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  44. 44.

    Chang, G. et al. Unconventional chiral fermions and large topological Fermi arcs in RhSi. Phys. Rev. Lett. 119, 206401 (2017).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  45. 45.

    Tang, P., Zhou, Q. & Zhang, S.-C. Multiple types of topological fermions in transition metal silicides. Phys. Rev. Lett. 119, 206402 (2017).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  46. 46.

    Sanchez, D. S. et al. Topological chiral crystals with helicoid-arc quantum states. Nature 567, 500–505 (2019).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  47. 47.

    Rao, Z. et al. Observation of unconventional chiral fermions with long Fermi arcs in CoSi. Nature 567, 496–499 (2019).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  48. 48.

    Takane, D. et al. Observation of chiral fermions with a large topological charge and associated Fermi-arc surface states in CoSi. Phys. Rev. Lett. 122, 076402 (2019).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  49. 49.

    Flicker, F. et al. Chiral optical response of multifold fermions. Phys. Rev. B 98, 155145 (2018).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  50. 50.

    de Juan, F. et al. Difference frequency generation in topological semimetals. Phys. Rev. Res. 2, 012017 (2020).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. 51.

    Rees, D. et al. Helicity-dependent photocurrents in the chiral Weyl semimetal RhSi. Sci. Adv. 6, eaba0509 (2020).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. 52.

    König, E. J., Xie, H.-Y., Pesin, D. A. & Levchenko, A. Photogalvanic effect in Weyl semimetals. Phys. Rev. B 96, 075123 (2017).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  53. 53.

    Maulana, L. et al. Optical conductivity of multifold fermions: The case of RhSi. Phys. Rev. Res. 2, 023018 (2020).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  54. 54.

    Wu, D. et al. Optical investigations of the normal and superconducting states reveal two electronic subsystems in iron pnictides. Phys. Rev. B 81, 100512 (2010).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  55. 55.

    Dai, Y. M. et al. Hidden T-linear scattering rate in Ba0.6K0.4Fe2As2 revealed by optical spectroscopy. Phys. Rev. Lett. 111, 117001 (2013).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  56. 56.

    Xu, B. et al. Band-selective clean-limit and dirty-limit superconductivity with nodeless gaps in the bilayer iron-based superconductor CsCa2Fe4As4F2. Phys. Rev. B 99, 125119 (2019).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  57. 57.

    Sánchez-Martínez, M.-Á., de Juan, F. & Grushin, A. G. Linear optical conductivity of chiral multifold fermions. Phys. Rev. B 99, 155145 (2019).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  58. 58.

    Xu, B. et al. Optical signatures of multifold fermions in the chiral topological semimetal CoSi. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2010752117 (2020).

  59. 59.

    Chang, G. et al. Unconventional photocurrents from surface Fermi arcs in topological chiral semimetals. Phys. Rev. Lett. 124, 166404 (2020).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  60. 60.

    Shan, J. & Heinz, T. F. in Ultrafast Dynamical Processes in Semiconductors 1–56 (Springer, 2004).

  61. 61.

    Sotome, M. et al. Spectral dynamics of shift current in ferroelectric semiconductor SbSI. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 116, 1929–1933 (2019).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  62. 62.

    Hernández-Cabrera, A., Tejedor, C. & Meseguer, F. Linear electro-optic effects in zinc blende semiconductors. J. Appl. Phys. 58, 4666–4669 (1985).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  63. 63.

    Boyd, R. W. Nonlinear Optics (Academic Press, 2003).

  64. 64.

    Ni, Z. et al. Giant topological longitudinal circuarly photogalvanic effect in the chiral multifold semimetal CoSi. Preprintat https://arxiv.org/abs/2006.09612 (2020).

  65. 65.

    Fei, R., Tan, L. Z. & Rappe, A. M. Shift-current bulk photovoltaic effect influenced by quasiparticle and exciton. Phys. Rev. B 101, 045104 (2020).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  66. 66.

    Rangel, T. et al. Large bulk photovoltaic effect and spontaneous polarization of single-layer monochalcogenides. Phys. Rev. Lett. 119, 067402 (2017).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  67. 67.

    Zhang, Y., de Juan, F., Grushin, A. G., Felser, C. & Sun, Y. Strong bulk photovoltaic effect in chiral crystals in the visible spectrum. Phys. Rev. B 100, 245206 (2019).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  68. 68.

    Koepernik, K. & Eschrig, H. Full-potential nonorthogonal local-orbital minimum-basis band-structure scheme. Phys. Rev. B 59, 1743 (1999).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  69. 69.

    Perdew, J. P., Burke, K. & Ernzerhof, M. Generalized gradient approximation made simple. Phys. Rev. Lett. 77, 3865 (1996).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  70. 70.

    Le, C., Zhang, Y., Felser, C. & Sun, Y. Ab initio study of quantized circular photogalvanic effect in chiral multifold semimetals. Phys. Rev. B 102, 121111 (2020).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  71. 71.

    Němec, P., Fiebig, M., Kampfrath, T. & Kimel, A. V. Antiferromagnetic opto-spintronics. Nat. Phys. 14, 229–241 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  72. 72.

    Hosur, P. Circular photogalvanic effect on topological insulator surfaces: Berry-curvature-dependent response. Phys. Rev. B 83, 035309 (2011).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  73. 73.

    Homes, C. C., Reedyk, M., Cradles, D. A. & Timusk, T. Technique for measuring the reflectance of irregular, submillimeter-sized samples. Appl. Opt. 32, 2976–2983 (1993).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  74. 74.

    Dressel, M. & Grüner, G. Electrodynamics of Solids (Cambridge University Press, 2002).

  75. 75.

    Sipe, J. E. & Ghahramani, E. Nonlinear optical response of semiconductors in the independent-particle approximation. Phys. Rev. B 48, 11705–11722 (1993).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  76. 76.

    Yates, J. R., Wang, X., Vanderbilt, D. & Souza, I. Spectral and Fermi surface properties from Wannier interpolation. Phys. Rev. B 75, 195121 (2007).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank G. Chang and Z. Fang for helpful discussions. Z.N. and L.W. are supported by Army Research Office under Grant W911NF1910342. J.W.F.V. is supported by a seed grant from NSF MRSEC at Penn under the Grant DMR-1720530. B.X. and C.B. were supported by the Schweizerische Nationalfonds (SNF) by Grant No. 200020-172611. M.-A.S.-M acknowledges support from the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation program under the Marie-Sklodowska-Curie grant agreement No. 754303 and the GreQuE Cofund program. A.G.G. is supported by the ANR under the grant ANR-18-CE30-0001-01 (TOPODRIVE) and the European Union Horizon 2020 research and innovation program under grant agreement No. 829044 (SCHINES). F.d.J. acknowledges funding from the Spanish MCI/AEI through grant No. PGC2018-101988-B-C21. Y.Z. is currently supported by the DOE Office of Basic Energy Sciences under Award desc0018945 to Liang Fu. Y.Z., K.M., and C.F. acknowledge financial support from the European Research Council (ERC) Advanced Grant No. 742068 “TOP-MAT” and Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (Project-ID 258499086 and FE 63330-1). This research was supported in part by the National Science Foundation under Grant No. NSF PHY11-25915. The DFT calculations were carried out on the Draco cluster of MPCDF, Max Planck society.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

L.W. conceived the project and coordinated the experiments and theory. Z.N. performed the THz emission experiments and analyzed the data with L.W. B.X. and C.B. performed the optical conductivity measurement and analyzed the data together with L.W. J.W.F.V. fitted the DFT band structure. M.-A.S.-M and A.G.G. performed the tight-binding calculation. Y.Z. performed the DFT calculation. K.M and C.F. grew the crystals. L.W., A.G.G., and F.d.J. interpreted the data jointly with the calculations. L.W. and A.G.G. wrote the manuscript with inputs from B.X., Y.Z., and N.Z. All authors edited the manuscript.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to A. G. Grushin or Liang Wu.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ni, Z., Xu, B., Sánchez-Martínez, MÁ. et al. Linear and nonlinear optical responses in the chiral multifold semimetal RhSi. npj Quantum Mater. 5, 96 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41535-020-00298-y

Download citation

Further reading

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing