REPLYING TO K. A. Jellinger. npj Parkinsons Disease https://doi.org/10.1038/s41531-022-00337-4 (2022)
We have read with interest the “Matters Arising” text of Kurt Jellinger, in which he comments on some parts of our recent paper1. To our statements: “a) that from the strict pathological point of view, there is practically no difference between PD and PDD; even the experienced neuropathologist is not able to differentiate, and (b) that there is no sharp pathological border between PDD and DLB, although the degree of AD pathology and the presence of CAA are probably the most significant pathological differences between these two phenotypes“ adds Dr. Jellinger exceptionally valuable personal experience gained from decades of neuropathological research in parkinsonism and atypical parkinsonism. We are aware of his seminal works from 2007 and 2010 in which he reported autopsy findings in parkinsonian patients and also the differences between findings in those demented and those not2,3. Indeed, we have also (very recently) carefully studied his last paper on this topic from 20224, in which he has broadly discussed the study of Hansen et al.5.
We believe that our present work corroborates with the Dr. Jellinger’s findings and related inferences from the point of view of neuropathology of parkinsonism. The issues we raised were in the regard to reliability of current clinical diagnostic criteria of the LBD phenotypes, which we believe are either outdated or – at best – speculative. Of course, there might be a broad spectrum of cognitive deterioration present in parkinsonism, from mild cognitive impairment to severe dementia. This spectrum seems to be pathologically reflected in the given degree of Braak’s LBD staging, however, it is apparently not reflected in the beta-amyloid load.
Moreover, except of β-amyloid load and CAA pathology, there is an increasing evidence that more different co-pathologies in either LBD or PD as well as other neurodegenerative disorders can be considered6. From the clinical point of view, this fact substantially compromises the concept of disease-specific phenotype and makes clinical diagnosis more difficult7,8,9. This is already known from the daily practice, nevertheless, it should be confirmed in much larger cross-correlation studies.
We therefore welcome the debated issues raised by Dr. Jellinger regarding our concept of the existence of only two “Lewy body diseases“, Parkinson’s disease and dementia with Lewy bodies; the mutual relationships of Lewy pathology and β-amyloid and CAA pathology in both these phenotypes were excellently described in his comment too.
References
Menšíková, K. et al. Lewy body disease or diseases with Lewy bodies? NPJ Parkinsons Dis. 8, 3 (2022).
Jellinger, K. A. Morphological substrates of parkinsonism with and without dementia: a retrospective clinico-pathological study. J. Neural Transm. Suppl. 72, 91–104 (2007).
Jellinger, K. A. The neuropathologic substrate of Parkinson disease dementia. Acta Neuropathol. 119, 151–153 (2010).
Jellinger, K. A. Morphological differences between dementia with Lewy bodies and Parkinson’s disease-dementia. Neuropathol. Appl. Neurobiol. 48, e12708 (2022).
Hansen, D. et al. Novel clinicopathological characteristics differentiate dementia with Lewy bodies from Parkinson’s disease dementia. Neuropathol. Appl. Neurobiol. 47, 143–156 (2021).
Robinson, J. et al. Neurodegenerative disease concomitant proteinopathies are prevalent, age-related and APOE4-associated. Brain 141, 2181–2193 (2018).
Coughlin, D. et al. Cognitive and pathological influences of tau pathology in Lewy body disorders. Ann. Neurol. 85, 259–271 (2019).
Matěj, R. et al. Alzheimer’s disease and other neurodegenerative dementias in comorbidity: a clinical and neuropathological overview. Clin. Biochem. 73, 26–31 (2019).
Picková, T. et al. Genetic Alzheimer Disease and sporadic dementia with Lewy bodies: a comorbidity presenting as primary progressive aphasia. Cogn. Behav. Neurol. 30, 23–29 (2017).
Acknowledgements
The authors thank Sarah E. Cook, MSc., for the language editing.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
P.K., K.M., R.M, R.R. and C.C. made substantial contributions to the conception and drafting of the work; L.T., J.E., D.H., K.K., R.V., and R.Vr. made substantial contributions to the drafting of the work; L.T. and D.H. contributed to the conception and drafting of the work; M.P., M.N., M.K., S.K. and P.O. contributed to the critical review of the final version and final approval of the completed version of the text.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Menšíková, K., Matěj, R., Colosimo, C. et al. Reply: Matters Arising ‘Lewy body disease or diseases with Lewy bodies?’. npj Parkinsons Dis. 8, 80 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41531-022-00338-3
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41531-022-00338-3