Electrophysiological experiments in microgravity: lessons learned and future challenges


Advances in electrophysiological experiments have led to the discovery of mechanosensitive ion channels (MSCs) and the identification of the physiological function of specific MSCs. They are believed to play important roles in mechanosensitive pathways by allowing for cells to sense their mechanical environment. However, the physiological function of many MSCs has not been conclusively identified. Therefore, experiments have been developed that expose cells to various mechanical loads, such as shear flow, membrane indentation, osmotic challenges and hydrostatic pressure. In line with these experiments, mechanical unloading, as experienced in microgravity, represents an interesting alternative condition, since exposure to microgravity leads to a series of physiological adaption processes. As outlined in this review, electrophysiological experiments performed in microgravity have shown an influence of gravity on biological functions depending on ion channels at all hierarchical levels, from the cellular level to organs. In this context, calcium signaling represents an interesting cellular pathway, as it involves the direct action of calcium-permeable ion channels, and specific gravitatic cells have linked graviperception to this pathway. Multiple key proteins in the graviperception pathways have been identified. However, measurements on vertebrae cells have revealed controversial results. In conclusion, electrophysiological experiments in microgravity have shown that ion-channel-dependent physiological processes are altered in mechanically unloaded conditions. Future experiments may provide a better understanding of the underlying mechanisms.


Living organisms strongly adapt to their daily mechanical load, and cells have shown responses to various mechanical stimuli in in-vitro experiments.1,2,3,4,5,6,7 However, it is still not fully understood how cells transform mechanical stimuli into biological responses. Among other mechanisms, mechanosensitive ion channels (MSCs) are thought to be key players (reviewed in refs. 3,5,7,8,9,10). Advances in electrophysiological experiments have shown that multiple mechanically induced physiological responses involve the activation of specific ion channels. However, the physiological function is not clear for many identified MSCs.11,12,13 Vice versa, multiple physiological functions are thought to rely on MSCs, but the pore-forming protein could not be identified.14 Various in-situ electrophysiological experiments have been developed to elucidate these unknowns. In this context, microgravity platforms have revealed interesting results: They allow for the study of biological processes in a mechanically unloaded condition. Furthermore, exposure to microgravity leads to a series of physiological adaption processes (reviewed in refs.15,16,17).

This review article outlines electrophysiological experiments performed in microgravity. After a general introduction to the mechanosensitivity of ion channels, various electrophysiological experiments conducted on multiple microgravity platforms are summarized. These experiments have shown an influence of gravity on all hierarchical levels of organization, from the cellular level to the organ. Furthermore, the gravitational effects on calcium signaling are discussed. The findings indicate that, despite the technical challenges, such experiments help to better understand how mechanical forces affects electrophysiological mechanisms.

Mechanosensitivity of ion channels

Patch clamping electrically isolates an area of the cell’s membrane and enables electrophysiological recordings with high special resolution.18 Many MSCs have been discovered by aspiring a membrane patch with a glass micro-pipette and stretching it by suction (reviewed in ref. 19). MSCs (also referred as stretch activated channels) are characterized by their conformational change in response to mechanical load and the resulting transition into an open or closed state (reviewed in ref.20). MSCs are believed to play important roles in mechanosensitive pathways, allowing for cells to sense their mechanical environment (reviewed in refs. 3,5,7,8,9,10).

Along with the increasing numbers of identified mechanosensitive ion channels,11,21,22 the elucidation of the physiological function of specific MSCs has also progressed. For instance, the bacterial large conductance mechanosensitive channel (MscL) and small conductance mechanosensitive channel (MscS) are activated by membrane tension just below rupture tension of the lipid bilayer. Thereby, they function as “pressure relieve valves” and protect the cell from lysis in case of extreme osmotic swelling, such as after rainfall.1,23,24,25,26,27 MEC-4 (a member of the DEG/ENaC family) was identified as a mechanotransducer in Caenorhabditis elegans. External force activates mechanoreceptor currents in the touch receptor neurons.28 Similar, MSCs in the dorsal root ganglia of sensory neurons in vertebrates are activated by mechanical stimuli, thereby converting the mechanical stimuli into an electrical signal. Piezo2 and TRPA1 (transient receptor potential cation channel, first member in the ankyrin subfamily) are among the potential MSC candidates (reviewed in ref. 29). Additionally, in the inner ear of mammals, mechanically sensitive hair bundles protruding apically from hair cells transduce auditory and vestibular stimuli. Bundle deflection caused by sound-induced vibrations (auditory) or movement of the overlying otolithic membrane (vestibular) directly opens cation-permeable MSCs in the hair cell (reviewed in ref. 14). However, the pore-forming protein could not be fully identified.30

Currently, four eukaryotic channel families are thought to contain mechanosensitive members: the degenerin/epithelial sodium channels (DEG/ENaC), transient receptor potential channels (TRP), two-pore-domain potassium channels (K2P) and MscS-like channels (reviewed in refs.10,11). “MSCs are extremely diverse at a molecular level”19 and no “force-sensing domain” could be identified yet.21 For many MSCs it is unclear how the channel is coupled with the mechanical force, which is the subject of ongoing research. Some specific channels are thought to be linked either directly or indirectly to the cytoskeleton or the extracellular matrix. Other channels are believed to interact only with the surrounding lipids (reviewed in refs.19,20,21,31,32). For the latter channels, the channel-gating mechanism could be determined by the membrane properties, lipid mismatches and far-field tension (reviewed in ref.19,20,21). The properties of the lipid bilayer are known to respond to various changing conditions such as temperature,33 deformation,34 pH,35 specific ions,36 and gravity.37

The physiological function of many ion channels that have been identified to be mechanosensitive is still unknown.11 To add further complexity, various MSC channels can be activated through multiple pathways (reviewed in22). TRPC1 (transient receptor potential channel 1), for instance, is thought to be activated by the depletion of intracellular calcium-stores (store-operated calcium influx), through interactions with inositol 1,4,5-trisphosphate receptors (IP3Rs) or mechanically (stretch activated; reviewed in ref. 38). Likewise, TRPV4 (transient receptor potential cation channel, the fourth member in the vanilloid subfamily) is activated in response to hypotonic environments, membrane stress and moderate heat (24–38 °C; reviewed in ref. 39). One reason why the physiological function of many MSCs is unknown is because their mechanosensitivity has been detected in patch-clamping experiments with highly stressed plasma membranes.20 However, the cell membrane is thought to be relaxed under normal physiological conditions.40 Therefore, some channels that are considered to be MSCs might not belong to a physiological force-sensing system at all. Yet, some channels that are not considered to be MSCs are also known to be sensitive to membrane stretch. The voltage-dependent K+ channel (Kv), for instance, shows sensitivity to small mechanical perturbations of the membrane.41 Therefore, sensitivity to membrane tension could be a much more general property than commonly thought.21

Various experiments have been developed to determine the physiological function of MSCs, which have exposed cells to various mechanical loads in situ. In such electrophysiological experiments, cells have been exposed to cell stretch,42,43,44,45 shear flow,46,47,48 membrane indentation,49,50,51 osmotic challenges,52,53 hydrostatic pressure54,55,56 and other loading conditions. In line with these experiments, mechanical unloading, as experienced in microgravity, represents an interesting condition, since exposure to microgravity leads to a series of physiological adaption processes (reviewed in refs. 15,16,17).

Electrophysiological experiments in microgravity

Effects at the cellular and tissue levels

A number of electrophysiological experiments have been conducted in microgravity conditions. They have demonstrated that microgravity influences biological functions depending on electrophysiological properties at all levels of the hierarchical organization, from the membrane to the whole system (Fig. 1). Plain lipid membranes and membranes of the human neuroblastoma cell line SH-SY5Y become more fluid (lower viscosity) with decreasing gravity during parabolic flights.37 By applying high electrostatic potentials across plain lipid membranes (>100 mV), current fluctuations can be induced (reviewed in refs.57). This membrane conductance was reduced at lower gravity levels (during parabolic flight). The authors speculated that the increased membrane fluidity in microgravity could accelerate the repair of membrane structure defects.58 In the same experiment, the electrical capacity of plain lipid vesicles was slightly higher in hypergravity and microgravity. However, the authors could not rule out that the effect was due to changes in membrane geometry.58

Fig. 1

Effect of microgravity on cellular and organ functions that depend on ion channels. Gravity affects ion-channel-dependent physiological functions at all level of organization, from the membrane and the channels to the whole organism (left column). The middle column indicates microgravity induced effects and the right column indicate the specimen in which these effects have been observed. The images (left column) illustrate representative structures of microgravity exposed specimens

As discussed above, the properties of lipid membranes could directly affect the kinetics of ion channels (see section “Mechanosensitivity of ion channels”). One could therefore expect gravity to influence specific ion channels as well. An early experiment on liposome-reconstituted cardiac gap junctions did not show altered channeling activity during parabolic flights.59 Later experiments showed that the open-state probability of porins isolated from Escherichia coli and incorporated into planar lipid bilayers decreased under microgravity and increased under hypergravity.60 Also, alamethicin, an artificial pore-forming polypeptide, shows reduced activity under microgravity and hypergravity.60,61,62 Furthermore, native oocytes from Xenopus laevis, as well as oocytes that overexpress epithelial sodium channels (ENaC), demonstrate reduced membrane conductivity under microgravity and increased conductivity under hypergravity (in parabolic flights).63,64 Ion channels are the key mediators of electric resting and action potentials (APs) in excitable cells. Neuronal cells (from the neuroblastoma cell line SH-SY5Y) hyperpolarized under higher gravity and depolarized under microgravity (parabolic flights).65 Likewise, insect neurons (SF21) depolarized in microgravity (drop tower experiment).66 AP kinetics are gravity dependent as well. The AP propagation velocity appeared to decrease under microgravity conditions and increased under hypergravity conditions in intact earthworms and isolated axons of rats and earthworms.67 The frequency of spontaneously spiking neurons in leeches increased in microgravity during a drop tower experiment.67 In agreement, excitable tissue is affected by gravity as well. Spreading depression (SD) waves in neuronal tissue are depolarization waves that are followed by a refractory period. The velocity of SD waves of retinal eyecups from chickens was slower under microgravity and faster under hypergravity (parabolic flights and centrifuges).68,69,70,71 However, the SD waves were faster during a sounding rocket mission (TEXUS).68 The authors speculated that a possible adaptation effect from the launch could have been the reason for this disagreement.

Effects at the organ and system levels

Microgravity-induced effects have also been observed at the organ and systemic levels. Stimulating the posterior tibial nerve leads to involuntary and nearly instantaneous muscle contractions (neuromuscular reaction) of the soleus muscle.72,73 Experiments during parabolic flights “indicated that synaptic and axonal nerve conduction velocity, as well as axonal and spinal excitability are diminished with reduced gravitational forces […] and increased […] in hypergravity”.73 Kohn and Ritzmann reviewed the influence of gravity on neuromuscular systems in more detail.74

Multiple measurements on brain activity (electroencephalography, EEG) have been conducted under reduced-gravity conditions on animals and human subjects. Rats showed reduced neuronal activity in the subthalamic cerebrovasodilator area, a key area in controlling cerebral blood flow, in low-gravity conditions (parabolic flight).75 Recordings of the slow cortical potential (SCP) during parabolic flights showed that the SCP shifted in a positive direction for 4 out of 9 subjects during microgravity. A negative shift during microgravity was recorded for 3 of the subjects, and no significant reaction could be detected for 2 of the subjects. A positive shift of the DC potential indicates lower excitability of the central nervous system and inhibition of the cortical network.76 EEG recordings from a passenger in an aerobatic plane performing parabolic maneuvers showed decreased intracranial activity during the microgravity phase with both open and closed eyes. Statistically significant differences could be detected in the left occipital lobe and the right temporal lobe.77,78

Frequency band analyses of EEGs recorded in microgravity have revealed controversial results. The power of the spontaneous mu and alpha rhythms (8–12 Hz) recorded in the eyes-closed state increased in microgravity. The experiments were conducted over the course of three space flights.79,80 Beta-2 EEG activity (18-35 Hz) in the right superior frontal gyrus was inhibited in microgravity during parabolic flights.81 The same group also found an increase in brain activity inflight as compared to preflight. They interpreted this as a sign of increase in arousal due to the uncommon environment inflight.82 Another group also found a decrease in beta amplitude in microgravity on 9 subjects during parabolic flights, which indicated a lower arousal in microgravity.76 Marušič et al. reviewed the effects of various gravity levels on the brain (EEG recordings).83

Several astronauts have experienced heart rhythm disturbances during space flight missions. However, it was not clear if these arrhythmias were caused by microgravity or a stressful psychologically situation (reviewed in ref. 84).

Gravitational effects on calcium signaling

Introduction to calcium signaling

In the context of electrophysiological experiments performed in microgravity, calcium signaling represents an interesting pathway: (1) Calcium signaling involves the direct action of calcium-permeable ion channels. (2) Specific gravitactic cells have linked gravitropism to calcium signaling.

Calcium (Ca2+) is a ubiquitous intracellular signal responsible for controlling numerous cellular processes, including the cell cycle, proliferation, differentiation, apoptosis and cytoskeletal remodeling (reviewed in refs.85,86). The concentration of free Ca2+ in cytosol is tightly regulated by the combined action of channels, buffers, pumps and exchangers.87 At rest, the cytosolic Ca2+ concentration is around 100 nM. During Ca2+ signaling, the free Ca2+ in the cytosol transiently increases to roughly 1000 nM (reviewed in ref. 86). The principle Ca2+ sources during Ca2+ signaling are the extracellular environment and internal Ca2+ stores (primarily located in the endoplasmic or sarcoplasmic reticulum). Specific Ca2+-permeable ion channels (transiently) open and allow Ca2+ ions to rush into the cytosol, along the electrochemical gradient (reviewed in ref.87). From the inflowing Ca2+, only a very small quantity ends up as free Ca2+. Most of it is rapidly sequestered by Ca2+ buffers and effectors (reviewed in ref. 87). Generally, Ca2+ ions quickly encounter a binding protein and do not diffuse far (around 0.1–0.5 μm).88,89 Therefore, Ca2+ signaling can be extremely localized (reviewed in ref.89). Each cell type expresses a unique set of proteins to create a Ca2+ signaling system with different spatial and temporal properties (reviewed in refs. 86,87). Since several Ca2+-permeable ion channels have been shown to be sensitive to mechanical load, it is speculated that mechanical load could very well interfere with Ca2+ signaling.85

Calcium signaling in gravitaxis

Graviperception is linked to Ca2+ signaling in specific gravitatic organisms, such as Euglena and Arabidopsis thaliana. The unicellular algae Euglena migrate vertically in the water column to an optimal position. Besides being phototactic, Euglena show an evidently negative gravitaxis (swimming against the gravity vector). Euglena are slightly denser than their surrounding water. The gravity-induced pressure of the whole cell body activates specific Ca2+-permeable MSCs at the front end of the cell.90,91 A transient receptor potential-like (TRP) channel has been identified as the presumable MSC.92 The entering Ca2+ binds to a specific calmodulin,93 which then activates cAMP-producing adenylyl cyclase.94 The cAMP subsequently activates a specific protein kinase A,95 which is thought to phosphorylate proteins inside the flagellum, resulting in a corrected swimming direction (reviewed in96,97). Accordingly, Euglena gracilis showed a transient Ca2+ signal when going from lower to higher accelerations during parabolic flights.98,99 During a sounding rocket flight (MAXUS 3) with an inflight centrifuge, Euglena longa showed an intermediate Ca2+ fluorescence signal in microgravity. The signal increased steeply with increasing acceleration by centrifugation.100 Also, the unicellular algae Astasia showed an increase in Ca2+ signal upon acceleration and a decrease in microgravity conditions during a sounding rocket experiment (MAXUS 3).101 Gravitaxis of Euglena has been reviewed in detail by Häder et al.96,97

Gravity sensing is thought to be mediated by Ca2+ in higher plants as well.102,103,104,105,106,107 However, the molecular mechanisms are not well understood.103,108 Gravity stimulation by parabolic flight induced a delayed increase in cytosolic Ca2+ in A. thaliana seedlings. Isolated A. thaliana cells showed an increase in intracellular Ca2+ concentration under low gravity and a decrease under hypergravity (parabolic flight).109,110

Calcium signaling in cells of vertebrates

Recordings of the intracellular concentrations of free Ca2+ in animal cells under various gravitational loads have revealed controversial results so far. The intracellular Ca2+ concentration of neuronal cells decreased under microgravity during a drop tower experiment.111 In contrast, the intracellular Ca2+ concentration increased in a human neuroblastoma cell line (SH-SY5Y) under hypergravity and microgravity during a parabolic flight, which was believed to be due to a memory or hysteresis effect resulting from an increased Ca2+ concentration during the hypergravity phase.112 Still, recent data from the same human cell line (SH-SY5Y, undifferentiated state) showed that intracellular Ca2+ concentration increased under lower gravity and decreased under higher gravity (parabolic flight).113 Furthermore, findings by our group have shown that a microgravity-induced shift in free Ca2+ is cell-cycle dependent in mammalian cells (parabolic flight; publication in preparation). In a pilot study on native Xenopus laevis oocytes, a Ca2+-dependent current tended to be smaller under microgravity than under 1 g conditions (parabolic flight).114

Methods used in electrophysiological microgravity experiments

Taken together, only limited numbers of electrophysiological experiments, especially at the cellular or subcellular level, have been conducted in microgravity conditions. In addition to limited access to microgravity platforms, classical electrophysiological techniques require delicate micromanipulation, which is not compatible with the high mechanical load generated on microgravity platforms. An attempt to use classical patch clamping in parabolic flights was discontinued because the aircraft’s vibrations frequently destroyed the patch and the recorded data had a poor signal-to-noise ratio.66 Even the mechanical disturbance caused by the release of the capsule in drop tower experiments was enough to destroy the patch. Only 3 out of 16 drops were successful during a previous drop tower campaign.67 An attempt to fly Xenopus laevis oocytes on a sounding rocket failed due to the high mechanical load during launch.115 Parabolic flight experiments with a two-electrode voltage clamp (TEVC) on Xenopus laevis oocytes have been discontinued due to practical manipulation difficulties. The oocytes were impaled with two micro-pipettes under a microscope in flight.63 Therefore, robust setups are required that need little micromanipulation. An adapted and non-invasive macro patch-clamp technique was used successfully on Xenopus laevis oocytes during parabolic flights.64,114 Also, the Port-a-Patch device from Nanion Technologies GmbH (Munich, Germany), employing a planar patch-clamp technique, was successfully used on a glioblastoma cell line (SNB19) during parabolic flights.116 Both setups require only simple in-flight manipulations and do not require a microscope. Voltage-sensitive or Ca2+-sensitive fluorescent dyes, which were recorded by optical means, have been successfully used multiple times.98,101,111,112,113 However, cytotoxicity, dye internalization and photo bleaching can limit the duration of the experiment.117 For instance, Meissner et al. reported degeneration of the cells while evacuating the drop tube in drop tower experiments.111

The extensive work identifying the molecular mechanisms responsible for gravitaxis in Euglena (see section “Calcium signaling in gravitaxis”), is a good example that microgravity experiments start on ground. By using pharmaceutical blockers and ionophores, it was shown that Ca2+ signaling is involved in gravitactic orientation (reviewed in ref. 97). Experiments employing the Ca2+-dependent fluorescent dye Calcium Crimson showed an increase in free Ca2+, during the reorientation of the cells along the gravity vector. Microscopic visualizations revealed a bright fluorescent signal at the front of the cell, indicating the location of the Ca2+-permeable channels.90 The responsible MSC could later be identified by selective gene expression knockdown, using RNA interference (RNAi).92 As described previously, multiple experiments on Euglena, and similar organisms, were conducted during parabolic flights and sounding rocket missions. For these experiments voltage-sensitive or Ca2+-sensitive fluorescent dyes were successfully employed.98,99,100,101 The work on entangling the molecular pathway responsible for gravitaxis in Euglena (reviewed in refs. 96,97) illustrates that we now have the tools to accomplish such challenges. Especially fluorescent probes in combination with an optical system proved to be useful tools on microgravity platforms.

Conclusion and outlook

The results of the successful experiments suggest that gravity influences cellular and organ functions depending on ion channels. Generally speaking, it seems that the open-state probability of ion channels is lower and the kinematics is slower in low-gravity conditions. This could indicate that sensitivity to mechanical load could be a rather general property of ion channels. Since the channel-gating properties may be directly influenced by the membrane properties1921, which are also gravity dependent,37 the membrane might be the primary structure of a cellular gravity-sensitive system. How gravity affects Ca2+ signaling in animal cells remains unclear. Since several Ca2+-permeable ion channels are also mechanosensitive85 and Ca2+ signaling is involved in the graviperception of specific plants, gravity might interfere with Ca2+ signaling in non-specialized cells as well.

Many of the performed experiments have been “black box” experiments that did not allow mechanosensitive molecular identities to be identified. Recent advances in engineering (e.g., automation, micro technology, and fast data acquisition) and molecular biology (e.g., pharmaceutical substances, reporter dyes, siRNA and genetic manipulation) will provide a promising toolkit for developing even more advanced experiments. In our opinion, future studies may be aimed at identifying the molecular mechanisms responsible for the rapid physiological adaptations seen in unloaded conditions.15,16,17 As compared to classical “rinse-and-fix” type studies,118 electrophysiological experiments allow living cells to be observed continuously and in real time. This is a major advantage when experimenting on microgravity platforms, since transitions to hyper-, micro- or normal gravity can be directly observed.

Experiments in the mechanically unloaded condition of microgravity have revealed important and sometimes surprising results. Even though gravity becomes a very small force at the cellular or subcellular level, multiple experiments have shown that microgravity greatly influences the function of isolated cells.17,118,119,120,121,122 However, to date it is unclear whether cells sense microgravity directly or indirectly. In microgravity, all gravity-dependent physical processes are altered and thus, sedimentation (and buoyancy), hydrostatic pressure difference and convection are (almost) absent in a static cell culture system. This changes the microenvironment of a living cell, which might influence its normal behavior.123 In previous reviews on gravitational cell biology, scientists argued that nonspecialized cells are unable to sense unit gravity. At the cellular level, gravitational forces are much smaller than other forces such as electrical forces, thermal noise and chemical energies.123 Therefore, the response of microgravity exposed cells, must be the result of an altered microenvironment. However, in the light of the before discussed results, this view may have to be challenged. Almost instantaneous responses to microgravity observed on membranes, ion channels and isolated cells are unlikely to be triggered by reduced sedimentation or convection.

As discussed in this review, the sensitivity of ion channels to mechanical load may not be limited to MSCs but could be a rather general property.21 In fact, mechanosensitivity might be a general property at the molecular level. For instance, many of the enzymes and substrates involved in DNA synthesis, RNA processing, protein synthesis and glycolysis are only functional when immobilized on insoluble scaffolds (reviewed in refs.124,125). Even the lifetime of non-covalent bonds decreases under force.126 Surprisingly, the molecular processes of microtubule self-organization in a cell-free system also appear to be gravity dependent.127,128,129 In conclusion, electrophysiological experiments in microgravity have shown that ion-channel-dependent physiological processes are altered in a mechanically unloaded condition. Future experiments shall be aimed at better understanding the underlying mechanisms.


  1. 1.

    Hamill, O. P. & Martinac, B. Molecular basis of mechanotransduction in living cells. Physiol. Rev. 81, 685–740 (2001).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Ingber, D. E. Tensegrity II. How structural networks influence cellular information processing networks. J. Cell Sci. 116, 1397–1408 (2003).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Wang, J. H. & Thampatty, B. P. An introductory review of cell mechanobiology. Biomech. Model. Mechanobiol. 5, 1–16 (2006).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Wang, J., Lü, D., Mao, D. & Long, M. Mechanomics: an emerging field between biology and biomechanics. Protein Cell 5, 518–531 (2014).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Eyckmans, J., Boudou, T., Yu, X. & Chen, C. S. A Hitchhiker’s guide to mechanobiology. Dev. Cell 21, 35–47 (2011).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Vogel, V. & Sheetz, M. Local force and geometry sensing regulate cell functions. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 7, 265–275 (2006).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Huang, H., Kamm, R. D. & Lee, R. T. Cell mechanics and mechanotransduction: pathways, probes, and physiology. Am. J. Physiol. Cell Physiol. 287, C1–C11 (2004).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Christensen, A. P. & Corey, D. P. TRP channels in mechanosensation: direct or indirect activation? Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 8, 510–521 (2007).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Ogneva, I. V. Cell mechanosensitivity: mechanical properties and interaction with gravitational field. BioMed. Res. Int. 2013, 598461 (2013).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Kobayashi, T. & Sokabe, M. Sensing substrate rigidity by mechanosensitive ion channels with stress fibers and focal adhesions. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 22, 669–676 (2010).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Arnadottir, J. & Chalfie, M. Eukaryotic mechanosensitive channels. Annu Rev. Biophys. 39, 111–137 (2010).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Haswell, E. S., Phillips, R. & Rees, D. C. Mechanosensitive channels: what can they do and how do they do it? Structure 19, 1356–1369 (2011).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Cox, C. D., Bavi, N. & Martinac, B. Bacterial mechanosensors. Annu Rev. Physiol. 80, 71–93 (2018).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Gillespie, P. G. & Walker, R. G. Molecular basis of mechanosensory transduction. Nature 413, 194–202 (2001).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Williams, D., Kuipers, A., Mukai, C. & Thirsk, R. Acclimation during space flight: effects on human physiology. CMAJ 180, 1317–1323 (2009).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Blaber, E., Marcal, H. & Burns, B. P. Bioastronautics: the influence of microgravity on astronaut health. Astrobiology 10, 463–473 (2010).

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Pietsch, J. et al. The effects of weightlessness on the human organism and mammalian cells. Curr. Mol. Med 11, 350–364 (2011).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Neher, E. & Sakmann, B. Single-channel currents recorded from membrane of denervated frog muscle fibres. Nature 260, 799–802 (1976).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Sachs, F. & Morris, C. E. Mechanosensitive ion channels in nonspecialized cells. Rev. Physiol. Biochem Pharmacol. 132, 1–77 (1998).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Sachs, F. Stretch-activated ion channels: what are they? Physiology 25, 50–56 (2010).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Anishkin, A., Loukin, S. H., Teng, J. & Kung, C. Feeling the hidden mechanical forces in lipid bilayer is an original sense. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 111, 7898–7905 (2014).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Gu, Y. & Gu, C. Physiological and pathological functions of mechanosensitive ion channels. Mol. Neurobiol. 50, 339–347 (2014).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Chang, G., Spencer, R. H., Lee, A. T., Barclay, M. T. & Rees, D. C. Structure of the MscL homolog from Mycobacterium tuberculosis: a gated mechanosensitive ion channel. Science 282, 2220–2226 (1998).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Perozo, E., Cortes, D. M., Sompornpisut, P., Kloda, A. & Martinac, B. Open channel structure of MscL and the gating mechanism of mechanosensitive channels. Nature 418, 942–948 (2002).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Sukharev, S. I., Blount, P., Martinac, B. & Kung, C. Mechanosensitive channels of Escherichia coli: the MscL gene, protein, and activities. Annu Rev. Physiol. 59, 633–657 (1997).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Sukharev, S., Betanzos, M., Chiang, C. S. & Guy, H. R. The gating mechanism of the large mechanosensitive channel MscL. Nature 409, 720–724 (2001).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Moe, P. C., Blount, P. & Kung, C. Functional and structural conservation in the mechanosensitive channel MscL implicates elements crucial for mechanosensation. Mol. Microbiol 28, 583–592 (1998).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    O’Hagan, R., Chalfie, M. & Goodman, M. B. The MEC-4 DEG/ENaC channel of Caenorhabditis elegans touch receptor neurons transduces mechanical signals. Nat. Neurosci. 8, 43–50 (2005).

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Hao, J., Bonnet, C., Amsalem, M., Ruel, J. & Delmas, P. Transduction and encoding sensory information by skin mechanoreceptors. Pflug. Arch. 467, 109–119 (2015).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Fettiplace, R. Is TMC1 the hair cell mechanotransducer channel? Biophys. J. 111, 3–9 (2016).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Hamill, O. P. Twenty odd years of stretch-sensitive channels. Pflug. Arch. 453, 333–351 (2006).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Hayakawa, K., Tatsumi, H. & Sokabe, M. Actin stress fibers transmit and focus force to activate mechanosensitive channels. J. Cell Sci. 121, 496–503 (2008).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Simon, S. A., Advani, S. & McIntosh, T. J. Temperature dependence of the repulsive pressure between phosphatidylcholine bilayers. Biophys. J. 69, 1473–1483 (1995).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    Gullingsrud, J. & Schulten, K. Lipid bilayer pressure profiles and mechanosensitive channel gating. Biophys. J. 86, 3496–3509 (2004).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    Gong, K., Feng, S.-S., Go, M. L. & Soew, P. H. Effects of pH on the stability and compressibility of DPPC/cholesterol monolayers at the air–water interface. Colloids Surf. A 207, 113–125 (2002).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    Ermakov, Y. A., Kamaraju, K., Sengupta, K. & Sukharev, S. Gadolinium ions block mechanosensitive channels by altering the packing and lateral pressure of anionic lipids. Biophys. J. 98, 1018–1027 (2010).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  37. 37.

    Sieber, M., Hanke, W. & Kohn, F. P. M. Modification of membrane fluidity by gravity. Open J. Biophys. 4, 7 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. 38.

    Rychkov, G. & Barritt, G. J. TRPC1 Ca(2+)-permeable channels in animal cells. Handb. Exp. Pharmacol. 23–52, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-34891-7_2 (2007).

  39. 39.

    Garcia-Elias, A. et al. The TRPV4 channel. Handb. Exp. Pharmacol. 222, 293–319 (2014).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  40. 40.

    Dai, J. & Sheetz, M. P. Mechanical properties of neuronal growth cone membranes studied by tether formation with laser optical tweezers. Biophys. J. 68, 988–996 (1995).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  41. 41.

    Schmidt, D., del Marmol, J. & MacKinnon, R. Mechanistic basis for low threshold mechanosensitivity in voltage-dependent K+ channels. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 109, 10352–10357 (2012).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  42. 42.

    Friedrich, O. et al. Adding dimension to cellular mechanotransduction: Advances in biomedical engineering of multiaxial cell-stretch systems and their application to cardiovascular biomechanics and mechano-signaling. Prog. Biophys. Mol. Biol. 130, 170–191 (2017).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  43. 43.

    Sadoshima, J., Takahashi, T., Jahn, L. & Izumo, S. Roles of mechano-sensitive ion channels, cytoskeleton, and contractile activity in stretch-induced immediate-early gene expression and hypertrophy of cardiac myocytes. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 89, 9905–9909 (1992).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  44. 44.

    Ito, S. et al. Actin cytoskeleton regulates stretch-activated Ca2+ influx in human pulmonary microvascular endothelial cells. Am. J. Respir. Cell Mol. Biol. 43, 26–34 (2010).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  45. 45.

    Qi, Y. et al. Uniaxial cyclic stretch stimulates TRPV4 to induce realignment of human embryonic stem cell-derived cardiomyocytes. J. Mol. Cell Cardiol. 87, 65–73 (2015).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  46. 46.

    Carattino, M. D., Sheng, S. & Kleyman, T. R. Epithelial Na+ channels are activated by laminar shear stress. J. Biol. Chem. 279, 4120–4126 (2004).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  47. 47.

    Shen, J., Luscinskas, F. W., Connolly, A., Dewey, C. F. Jr. & Gimbrone, M. A. Jr. Fluid shear stress modulates cytosolic free calcium in vascular endothelial cells. Am. J. Physiol. 262, C384–C390 (1992).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  48. 48.

    Olesen, S. P., Clapham, D. E. & Davies, P. F. Haemodynamic shear stress activates a K+ current in vascular endothelial cells. Nature 331, 168–170 (1988).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  49. 49.

    Huang, H., Bae, C., Sachs, F. & Suchyna, T. M. Caveolae regulation of mechanosensitive channel function in myotubes. PloS One 8, e72894 (2013).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  50. 50.

    Saitou, T., Ishikawa, T., Obara, K. & Nakayama, K. Characterization of whole-cell currents elicited by mechanical stimulation of Xenopus oocytes. Pflug. Arch. 440, 858–865 (2000).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  51. 51.

    Kamkin, A., Kiseleva, I. & Isenberg, G. Activation and inactivation of a non-selective cation conductance by local mechanical deformation of acutely isolated cardiac fibroblasts. Cardiovasc Res 57, 793–803 (2003).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  52. 52.

    Clemo, H. F., Stambler, B. S. & Baumgarten, C. M. Persistent activation of a swelling-activated cation current in ventricular myocytes from dogs with tachycardia-induced congestive heart failure. Circ. Res. 83, 147–157 (1998).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  53. 53.

    Phan, M. N. et al. Functional characterization of TRPV4 as an osmotically sensitive ion channel in porcine articular chondrocytes. Arthritis Rheum. 60, 3028–3037 (2009).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  54. 54.

    Wright, M., Jobanputra, P., Bavington, C., Salter, D. M. & Nuki, G. Effects of intermittent pressure-induced strain on the electrophysiology of cultured human chondrocytes: evidence for the presence of stretch-activated membrane ion channels. Clin. Sci. 90, 61–71 (1996).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  55. 55.

    Wang, E. C. et al. Hydrostatic pressure-regulated ion transport in bladder uroepithelium. Am. J. Physiol. Ren. Physiol. 285, F651–F663 (2003).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  56. 56.

    Olsen, S. M., Stover, J. D. & Nagatomi, J. Examining the role of mechanosensitive ion channels in pressure mechanotransduction in rat bladder urothelial cells. Ann. Biomed. Eng. 39, 688–697 (2011).

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  57. 57.

    Heimburg, T. Lipid ion channels. Biophys. Chem. 150, 2–22 (2010).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  58. 58.

    Sieber, M., Kaltenbach, S., Hanke, W. & Kohn, F. P. M. Conductance and capacity of plain lipid membranes under conditions of variable gravity. J. Biomed. Sci. Eng. 9, 6 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  59. 59.

    Claassen, D. E. & Spooner, B. S. Effects of microgravity on liposome-reconstituted cardiac gap junction channeling activity. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 161, 358–362 (1989).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  60. 60.

    Goldermann, M. & Hanke, W. Ion channel are sensitive to gravity changes. Microgravity Sci. Technol. 13, 35–38 (2001).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  61. 61.

    Hanke, W. Studies of the interaction of gravity with biological membranes using alamethicin doped planar lipid bilayers as a model system. Adv. Space Res. 17, 143–150 (1996).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  62. 62.

    Klinke, N., Goldermann, M. & Hanke, W. The properties of alamethicin incorporated into planar lipid bilayers under the influence of microgravity. Acta Astronaut. 47, 771–773 (2000).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  63. 63.

    Richard, S. et al. A semi-automated electrophysiology system for recording from Xenopus oocytes under microgravity conditions. Microgravity Sci. Technol. 24, 237–244 (2012).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  64. 64.

    Schaffhauser, D. F. et al. Microfluidic platform for electrophysiological studies on Xenopus laevisoocytes under varying gravity levels. Lab a chip 11, 3471–3478 (2011).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  65. 65.

    Kohn, P. M. F. Life in Space for Life on Earth. (European Space Agency, Aberdeen, UK, 2012).

    Google Scholar 

  66. 66.

    Meissner, K. Elektrophysiologische Charakterisierung neuronaler Prozesse unter veränderten Schwerkraftbedingungen. (Logos-Verlag, Berlin, Germany, 2005).

  67. 67.

    Meissner, K. & Hanke, W. Action potential properties are gravity dependent. Microgravity Sci. Technol. 17, 38–43 (2005).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  68. 68.

    Hanke, W., de Lima, F., Wiedemann, M. V. & Meissner, K. Microgravity dependence of excitable biological and physicochemical media. Protoplasma 229, 235–242 (2006).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  69. 69.

    Wiedemann, M., Fernandes de Lima, V. M. & Hanke, W. Gravity dependence of waves in the retinal spreading depression and in gel type Belousov-Zhabotinsky systems. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 4, 1370–1373 (2002).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  70. 70.

    Hanke, W., Wiedemann, M. & Fernandes de Lima, V. M. Control of the excitability of neuronal tissue by weak external forces. Faraday Discuss. 120, 237–248 (2002).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  71. 71.

    Wiedemann, M. & Hanke, W. Gravity sensing in the central nervous system. J. Gravit. Physiol. 9, P43–P44 (2002).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  72. 72.

    Purves, D. Neuroscience. 3rd edn (Sinauer Associates, Publishers, 2004).

  73. 73.

    Ritzmann, R., Krause, A., Freyler, K. & Gollhofer, A. Gravity and neuronal adaptation. Microgravity Sci. Technol. 29, 9–18 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  74. 74.

    Kohn, F. P. M. & Ritzmann, R. Gravity and neuronal adaptation, in vitro and in vivo-from neuronal cells up to neuromuscular responses: a first model. Eur. Biophys. J. 47, 97–107 (2017).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  75. 75.

    Zeredo, Z. L., Toda, K. & Kumei, Y. Neuronal activity in the subthalamic cerebrovasodilator area under partial-gravity conditions in rats. Life 4, (107–116 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  76. 76.

    Wiedemann, M., Kohn, F. P. M., Roesner, H. & Hanke, W. R. L. in Self-organization and Pattern-formation in Neuronal Systems Under Conditions of Variable Gravity: Life Sciences Under Space Conditions. 145–165 (Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2011).

  77. 77.

    Dubert, D. et al. in Proceedings of the 67th Astronautical Congress. IAC-16-A11. 12.14-IAC-16-A11. 12.14.

  78. 78.

    Dubert, D., Ruiz, X., Gavaldà, J. & Pérez Poch, A. in Libro de actas del CASEIB 2015. 171–174.

  79. 79.

    Cheron, G. et al. Effect of gravity on human spontaneous 10-Hz electroencephalographic oscillations during the arrest reaction. Brain Res 1121, 104–116 (2006).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  80. 80.

    Leroy, A. et al. Mu and alpha EEG rhythms during the arrest reaction in microgravity. Microgravity Sci. Technol. 19, 102–107 (2007).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  81. 81.

    Schneider, S. et al. What happens to the brain in weightlessness? A first approach by EEG tomography. Neuroimage 42, 1316–1323 (2008).

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  82. 82.

    Schneider, S. et al. Increased brain cortical activity during parabolic flights has no influence on a motor tracking task. Exp. Brain Res 185, 571–579 (2008).

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  83. 83.

    Marušič, U., Meeusen, R., Pišot, R. & Kavcic, V. The brain in micro- and hypergravity: the effects of changing gravity on the brain electrocortical activity. Eur. J. Sport Sci. 14, 813–822 (2014).

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  84. 84.

    Buckey, J. C. Space Physiology. (Oxford University Press, New York, USA, 2006).

  85. 85.

    Benavides Damm, T. & Egli, M. Calcium’s role in mechanotransduction during muscle development. Cell. Physiol. Biochem. 33, 249–272 (2014).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  86. 86.

    Berridge, M. J., Lipp, P. & Bootman, M. D. The versatility and universality of calcium signalling. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 1, 11–21 (2000).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  87. 87.

    Berridge, M. J., Bootman, M. D. & Roderick, H. L. Calcium signalling: dynamics, homeostasis and remodelling. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 4, 517–529 (2003).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  88. 88.

    Allbritton, N. L., Meyer, T. & Stryer, L. Range of messenger action of calcium ion and inositol 1,4,5-trisphosphate. Science 258, 1812–1815 (1992).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  89. 89.

    Clapham, D. E. Calcium signaling. Cell 80, 259–268 (1995).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  90. 90.

    Hader, D. P. & Lebert, M. Graviperception and gravitaxis in algae. Adv. Space Res. 27, 861–870 (2001).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  91. 91.

    Häder, D. P., Richter, P., Ntefidou, M. & Lebert, M. Gravitational sensory transduction chain in flagellates. Adv. Space Res. 36, 1182–1188 (2005).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  92. 92.

    Häder, D.-P., Richter, P. R., Schuster, M., Daiker, V. & Lebert, M. Molecular analysis of the graviperception signal transduction in the flagellate Euglena gracilis: Involvement of a transient receptor potential-like channel and a calmodulin. Adv. Space Res. 43, 1179–1184 (2009).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  93. 93.

    Daiker, V., Lebert, M., Richter, P. & Hader, D. P. Molecular characterization of a calmodulin involved in the signal transduction chain of gravitaxis in Euglena gracilis. Planta 231, 1229–1236 (2010).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  94. 94.

    Tahedl, H., Richter, P., Lebert, M. & Hader, D.-P. cAMP is involved in gravitaxis signal transduction of Euglena gracilis. Microgravity, Sci. Technol. 11, 173–178 (1998).

    Google Scholar 

  95. 95.

    Daiker, V., Hader, D. P., Richter, P. R. & Lebert, M. The involvement of a protein kinase in phototaxis and gravitaxis of Euglena gracilis. Planta 233, 1055–1062 (2011).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  96. 96.

    Häder, D.-P. et al. Investigation of gravitaxis and phototaxis in Euglena gracilis. In Advances in Life Sciences (eds Sinha, R., Sharma, N. K., & Rai, A. K.) 117–131 (IK International Publishing House, New Delhi, 2010).

  97. 97.

    Hader, D. P. & Hemmersbach, R. Gravitaxis in Euglena. Adv. Exp. Med. Biol. 979, 237–266 (2017).

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  98. 98.

    Richter, P. R., Schuster, M., Wagner, H., Lebert, M. & Hader, D. P. Physiological parameters of gravitaxis in the flagellate Euglena gracilis obtained during a parabolic flight campaign. J. Plant Physiol. 159, 181–190 (2002).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  99. 99.

    Richter, P. R., Schuster, M., Meyer, I., Lebert, M. & Hader, D. P. Indications for acceleration-dependent changes of membrane potential in the flagellate Euglena gracilis. Protoplasma 229, 101–108 (2006).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  100. 100.

    Häder, D.-P. & Lebert, M. Mechanism of gravitactic signal perception and signal transduction of Euglena gracilis. Microgravity News, ESA 11, 14 (1998).

    Google Scholar 

  101. 101.

    Richter, P., Lebert, M., Tahedl, H. & Hader, D. P. Calcium is involved in the gravitactic orientation in colorless flagellates. J. Plant Physiol. 158, 689–697 (2001).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  102. 102.

    Plieth, C. Calcium: just another regulator in the machinery of life? Ann Bot 96, 1–8 (2005).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  103. 103.

    Tatsumi, H., Toyota, M., Furuichi, T. & Sokabe, M. Calcium mobilizations in response to changes in the gravity vector in Arabidopsis seedlings: possible cellular mechanisms. Plant Signal Behav. 9, e29099 (2014).

    PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  104. 104.

    Gehring, C. A., Williams, D. A., Cody, S. H. & Parish, R. W. Phototropism and geotropism in maize coleoptiles are spatially correlated with increases in cytosolic free calcium. Nature 345, 528–530 (1990).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  105. 105.

    Fasano, J. M., Massa, G. D. & Gilroy, S. Ionic signaling in plant responses to gravity and touch. J. Plant Growth Regul. 21, 71–88 (2002).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  106. 106.

    Plieth, C. & Trewavas, A. J. Reorientation of seedlings in the earth’s gravitational field induces cytosolic calcium transients. Plant Physiol. 129, 786–796 (2002).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  107. 107.

    Poovaiah, B. W., Yang, T. & van Loon, J. J. Calcium/calmodulin-mediated gravitropic response in plants. J. Gravit. Physiol. 9, P211–P214 (2002).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  108. 108.

    Zheng, H. Q., Han, F. & Le, J. higher plants in space: microgravity perception, response, and adaptation. Microgravity Sci. Technol. 27, 377–386 (2015).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  109. 109.

    Hausmann, N. et al. Cytosolic calcium, hydrogen peroxide and related gene expression and protein modulation in Arabidopsis thaliana cell cultures respond immediately to altered gravitation: parabolic flight data. Plant Biol. 16 (Suppl 1), 120–128 (2014).

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  110. 110.

    Neef, M., Ecke, M. & Hampp, R. Real-time recording of cytosolic calcium levels in Arabidopsis thaliana cell cultures during parabolic flights. Microgravity Sci. Technol. 27, 305–312 (2015).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  111. 111.

    Meissner, K., Piqueira, J. R. & Hanke, W. Fluorescent and dispersion experiments on biological membranes under micro-gravity. J. Gravit. Physiol. 11, P195–P196 (2004).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  112. 112.

    Kohn, F. P. M. High throughput fluorescent screening of membrane potential and intracellular calcium concentration under variable gravity conditions. Microgravity Sci. Technol. 25, 113–120 (2013).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  113. 113.

    Hauslage, J. et al. Cytosolic calcium concentration changes in neuronal cells under clinorotation and in parabolic flight missions. Microgravity Sci. Technol. 28, 633–638 (2016).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  114. 114.

    Wuest, S. L., Roesch, C., Ille, F. & Egli, M. Calcium dependent current recordings in Xenopus laevis oocytes in microgravity. Acta Astronaut. 141, 228–236 (2017).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  115. 115.

    Wuest, S. L. et al. Electrophysiological recordings on a sounding rocket: report of a first attempt using Xenopus laevis oocytes. Gravit. Space Res. 5, 43–56 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  116. 116.

    Kohn, F. P. M. Patch clamp experiments with human neuron-like cells under different gravity conditions. (2010).

  117. 117.

    Herron, T. J., Lee, P. & Jalife, J. Optical imaging of voltage and calcium in cardiac cells and tissues. Circ. Res. 110, 609–623 (2012).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  118. 118.

    Loon, J. J. W. A. v. Micro-gravity and mechanomics. Gravit. Space Biol. 20 (2007).

  119. 119.

    Najrana, T. & Sanchez-Esteban, J. Mechanotransduction as an adaptation to gravity. Front Pediatr. 4, 140 (2016).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  120. 120.

    Nickerson, C., Pellis, N. R. & Ott, C. M. Effect of Spaceflight and Spaceflight Analogue Culture on Human and Microbial Cells. (Springer, New York, USA, 2015).

  121. 121.

    Leys, N. M., Hendrickx, L., De Boever, P., Baatout, S. & Mergeay, M. Space flight effects on bacterial physiology. J. Biol. Regul. Homeost. Agents 18, 193–199 (2004).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  122. 122.

    Rosenzweig, J. A. et al. Spaceflight and modeled microgravity effects on microbial growth and virulence. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 85, 885–891 (2010).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  123. 123.

    Albrecht-Buehler, G. Possible mechanisms of indirect gravity sensing by cells. ASGSB Bull. 4, 25–34 (1991).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  124. 124.

    Ingber, D. E. The riddle of morphogenesis: a question of solution chemistry or molecular cell engineering? Cell 75, 1249–1252 (1993).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  125. 125.

    Ingber, D. How cells (might) sense microgravity. FASEB J. 13 Suppl, S3–15 (1999).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  126. 126.

    Merkel, R., Nassoy, P., Leung, A., Ritchie, K. & Evans, E. Energy landscapes of receptor-ligand bonds explored with dynamic force spectroscopy. Nature 397, 50–53 (1999).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  127. 127.

    Tabony, J. & Job, D. Gravitational symmetry breaking in microtubular dissipative structures. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 89, 6948–6952 (1992).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  128. 128.

    Papaseit, C., Pochon, N. & Tabony, J. Microtubule self-organization is gravity-dependent. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 97, 8364–8368 (2000).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  129. 129.

    Tabony, J., Glade, N., Papaseit, C. & Demongeot, J. Gravity dependence of microtubule preparations. J. Gravit. Physiol. 9, P245–P248 (2002).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references


We thank the Lucerne School of Engineering and Architecture (Switzerland) for sponsoring this publication. We also acknowledge Hansjörg Wyss Medical (USA) and Hansjörg Wyss for the financial support.

Author information




S.L.W.: Preparation of manuscript. B.G.: Figures, review of manuscript. F.I.: Review of manuscript. M.E.: Review of manuscript, funding.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Marcel Egli.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Wuest, S.L., Gantenbein, B., Ille, F. et al. Electrophysiological experiments in microgravity: lessons learned and future challenges. npj Microgravity 4, 7 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41526-018-0042-3

Download citation


Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing