Abstract
The tumor suppressor FANCD1/BRCA2 is crucial for DNA homologous recombination repair (HRR). BRCA2 biallelic pathogenic variants result in a severe form of Fanconi anemia (FA) syndrome, whereas monoallelic pathogenic variants cause mainly hereditary breast and ovarian cancer predisposition. For decades, the co-occurrence in trans with a clearly pathogenic variant led to assume that the other allele was benign. However, here we show a patient with biallelic BRCA2 (c.1813dup and c.7796 A > G) diagnosed at age 33 with FA after a hypertoxic reaction to chemotherapy during breast cancer treatment. After DNA damage, patient cells displayed intermediate chromosome fragility, reduced survival, cell cycle defects, and significantly decreased RAD51 foci formation. With a newly developed cell-based flow cytometric assay, we measured single BRCA2 allele contributions to HRR, and found that expression of the missense allele in a BRCA2 KO cellular background partially recovered HRR activity. Our data suggest that a hypomorphic BRCA2 allele retaining 37–54% of normal HRR function can prevent FA clinical phenotype, but not the early onset of breast cancer and severe hypersensitivity to chemotherapy.
Similar content being viewed by others
Introduction
Fanconi anemia (FA) is a rare genetic DNA repair syndrome characterized by bone marrow failure (BMF) and cancer predisposition particularly to acute myeloid leukemia (AML) and/or solid tumors, mainly head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC)1. FA cells exhibit chromosomal instability and hypersensitivity to DNA damage especially to DNA interstrand crosslinks (ICLs)2. Twenty-two FA-related genes have been identified including tumor suppressors BRCA1 (FANCS) and BRCA2 (FANCD1).
The breast cancer susceptibility 2 (BRCA2) protein is a key component of the DNA homologous recombination repair (HRR) pathway3 and a downstream component of the FA/BRCA DNA repair pathway1,2. Monoallelic germline pathogenic variants in BRCA2 are a common cause of hereditary breast and ovarian cancer (HBOC)4, while biallelic pathogenic variants are associated with FA5. Individuals with biallelic BRCA2 pathogenic variants usually suffer from a severe form of FA characterized by BMF, multiple congenital defects, and severe cancer predisposition as patients develop leukemia and/or multiple solid tumors (mainly Wilms and brain tumors) in the first decade of life. The overall risk of cancer in these patients is about 97% by the age of 5 years5,6,7,8,9.
Here, we describe an unusual clinical case consisting of a female patient who reached adulthood with no clear suspicion of a defined pathology, despite presenting two germline BRCA2 variants: a null frameshift variant c.1813dup, p.(Ile605Asnfs*11) and a missense variant c.7796 A > G, p.(Glu2599Gly). Using a BRCA2 KO HEK293T cell line stably transfected with an HRR GFP marker construct10 we demonstrated that the missense allele is partially functional providing 37–54% of HRR activity. We propose that p.(Glu2599Gly) is a hypomorphic allele that provides sufficient HRR activity to prevent FA onset, but it is insufficient to avoid tumorigenesis during adulthood and results in acute sensitivity to chemotherapy.
Results
Biallelic BRCA2-FA disorder diagnosis
Patient FA663 was a thirty-three-year-old woman who developed a malignant breast nodule and, after surgery, showed a severe intolerance to chemotherapy. A timeline of patient’s progression is shown in Fig. 1A. FA663 was an adopted child and her medical history only indicated slight abnormalities such as low birth weight, short stature, a subtle learning disability, skin hyperpigmentation, macrocytosis, hiatal hernia, hepatic steatosis, and lumbar disc herniation. Due to the severe pancytopenia reaction to chemotherapy, a chromosome fragility test (CFT)11 was performed in blood T-lymphocytes and the levels of chromosome fragility were compatible with a diagnosis of FA with somatic mosaicism (FA-mosaic) as only one-third of her cells presented multiple chromatid-type breaks and radial figures. (Fig. 1B)11,12, FA663 case was then included in a cohort of FA patients to be molecularly characterized by Exome Sequencing (ES)13, and two variants were identified in the BRCA2/FANCD1 gene. The first, c.1813dup, p.(Ile605Asnfs*11) was a clearly pathogenic variant in BRCA2 exon 10 that produced a frameshift and premature termination of translation (Fig. 1C). This variant had previously been described in FA patients8 and in HBOC patients14 and it is reported in ClinVar as pathogenic class 5 classified by the ENIGMA expert panel (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/clinvar/variation/37762/). A second missense variant c.7796 A > G, p.(Glu2599Gly) was identified in BRCA2 exon 16 (Fig. 1C) and classified as of “uncertain significance” according to the ACMG guidelines15. In ClinVar three submitters also interpreted this variant as of uncertain significance (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/clinvar/variation/483130/). Human Glu2599 is a highly conserved residue among organisms in the BRCA2 DNA binding domain (Fig. 1D) and the detected variant produced a non-conservative change from a negatively charged amino acid (Glu) to a non-polar amino acid (Gly). The p.(Glu2599Gly) is predicted deleterious for BRASS NN (score 0.912 pathogenic), BRASS MLR (score 1.675 pathogenic), AGVGD (Class C65), PolyPhen-2 (score 1 probably damaging) and SIFT (score 0.01 predict non-tolerated) in silico tools. No other potentially pathogenic variants were identified in any other known FA gene.
Patient fibroblasts retain partial DNA damage response
To confirm the diagnosis of FA663 as a FA mosaic11,16, and to study more in-depth patient’s DNA damage response (DDR), FA663 primary fibroblasts were analyzed together with fibroblasts from a wt control and from a patient with a homozygous BRCA2 null variant c.469 A > T; p.(Lys157*). In the CFT, FA663 fibroblasts showed a chromosome fragility level in-between the wt and BRCA2 deficient control and similar to that of blood T-lymphocytes (≈32% aberrant cells; ≈2.88 breaks per aberrant cell) (Fig. 2A). Similarly, intermediate results were also obtained in ICL induced G2/M phase cell cycle arrest (Fig. 2B), RAD51 foci formation (Fig. 2C), and sensitivity to the PARP inhibitors olaparib and veliparib (Fig. 2D, E).
Evidencing the in trans position of BRCA2 c.1813dup and c.7796 A > G variants
To assess if c.1813dup and c.7796 A > G variants were in trans, multiplex ligation-dependent probe assay (MLPA) and Sanger sequencing of the BRCA2 gene were undertaken in normal tissue samples and tumor samples from FA663 (Table 1). The two allelic variants of BRCA2 were found in blood, skin tissue, and in three primary tumor samples: invasive ductal carcinoma (IDC), contralateral ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS), and colorectal cancer (CRC) identified during a necropsy study (Table 1, Fig. 3A–D and Figure S1A). However, four metastatic breast cancer samples (hepatic metastasis and supraclavicular, pleural, hilar, and lymph nodes) infiltrated by the primary breast IDC tumor, and two patient-derived tumor xenograft (PDX) models (derived from supraclavicular and hilar metastases) showed loss of heterozygosity (LOH) in BRCA2 (Table 1, Fig. 3E–F and Figure S1B–E). Specifically, all the infiltrated nodes and PDXs samples presented exclusively the c.7796 G allele, suggesting that the two variants were located in trans (Table 1). In addition, the cDNA obtained from blood RNA and cultured fibroblasts was sequenced by Sanger (Figure S2). We observed a lower signal of the allele carrying the duplication in exon 10 (as a result of degradation by the nonsense-mediated mRNA decay (NMD) pathway) and a higher signal of the G allele of the missense variant c.7796 A > G in exon 16 with respect to that of the A wt allele, which is consistent with the two variants being located in different alleles. Overall, all these results support the position in trans of the two variants.
The hypomorphic missense p.(Glu2599Gly) variant displays 37–54% of HRR activity
Next, we generated a cellular system to quantify mutation-specific levels of HRR by genetic complementation of a human-derived BRCA2 deficient cell line, stably transfected with a GFP-based construct to detect HRR (BRCA2 KO HEK293T DR-GFP)10. The BRCA2 KO cell line was generated in our laboratory by CRISPR/Cas9 technology and it was functionally validated (Figure S3). Plasmids containing wt BRCA2 cDNA, empty vector (EV), and BRCA2 cDNA bearing either p.(Ile605Asnfs*11) or p.(Glu2599Gly) were transiently transfected in the BRCA2 KO HEK293T-DR-GFP. No expression of p.(Ile605Asnfs*11) BRCA2 protein could be observed by Western blot (WB) analysis, while the missense BRCA2 p.(Glu2599Gly) was expressed at comparable levels with the endogenous wt BRCA2 (Fig. 4A and Figure S4). BRCA2 mRNA expression was detected in PDX332 (derived from the supraclavicular node) to a similar level of BRCA2-wt PDXs, further evidencing the expression of the missense BRCA2 p.(Glu2599Gly) variant (Figure S5). The HRR capacity of the two BRCA2 variants was further quantified, using both an ionizing radiation-induced RAD51 foci formation (IR-IF) assay (Fig. 4B) and the DR-GFP reporter test by flow cytometry (Fig. 4C and Figure S6). With both techniques, cells expressing the missense allele had intermediate levels of HRR compared to the BRCA2 wt reconstituted cells that exhibited functional HRR, or the cells expressing the p.(Ile605Asnfs*11) that were HRR deficient (Fig. 4B, C). We established that the residual HRR function in the missense variant p.(Glu2599Gly) was 54%± 11 (s.e.m) (Fig. 4B) and of 37% ± 7 (s.e.m) (Fig. 4C). In agreement with these findings, we observed that the level of baseline RAD51 foci in tumor samples from the metastatic supraclavicular node and the two PDXs were intermediate and significantly different to BRCA2 wt and mutant breast tumors (Figure S7).
Discussion
The role of BRCA2 in DDR is relevant not only for tumor suppression, but also for organisms’ viability. Preceding studies in mice demonstrated that Brca2 is essential for normal embryonic development17 and indirect evidence indicates that most of the time this is also true for humans. Pathogenic variants such as c.5946delT (also known as 6174delT) with a carrier frequency of around 1–1.5% in Ashkenazi Jewish population have not been ever detected in the homozygous state as well as many common BRCA2 pathogenic variants that are located in exon 119. Nevertheless, it has been shown that biallelic deleterious BRCA2 variants in humans are compatible with life, despite being associated to severe forms of FA and childhood cancer predisposition6,7,8,9. In line with these formerly reported cases6, FA patients with biallelic BRCA2 pathogenic variants previously identified in our laboratory presented elevated chromosomal fragility, severe congenital aberrations and/or high cancer incidence by age 3 or younger (Table S1). On the contrary, patient FA663 had a tumor-free childhood and mild Fanconi Anemia-associated clinical features, which remained practically unnoticed to clinicians. Our work focuses on the detailed molecular characterization of a patient being a carrier of a pathogenic variant and a hypomorphic variant in BRCA2 that survived to adulthood with mild Fanconi Anemia-associated clinical features, but nonetheless developed young-onset breast cancer and had fatal evolution. Our functional complementation studies showed that p.(Glu2599Gly) missense allele retains between 37 and 54% of normal HRR activity levels, likely sufficient to suppress BMF, leukemia, and solid tumors during childhood, but not breast or colon cancer at adult age. Our accurate molecular screening of DNA from normal and tumor tissues demonstrated that the c.1813dup and c.7796 A > G variants were positioned in trans. The predicted frameshift caused by the FA663 variant c.1813dup produces a premature stop codon, which implies a degradation of the resulting transcript by NMD18. Our results of Sanger sequencing of blood and fibroblasts cDNA show a low signal of one allele supporting the NMD hypothesis (Figure S2).
Most of the BRCA-associated tumors undergo the loss of the BRCA-wt allele during tumor evolution, which turns the tumor into an HRR deficient (HRD) state and results in tumor sensitivity to DNA damaging chemotherapy. Intriguingly, while the primary tumors from this patient did not undergo LOH (Table 1; Fig. 3B–D), the metastatic tumors lose the BRCA2 truncating variant, retaining the missense mutated allele (Table 1; Fig. 3E–F and Figure S1B–E). This could be an evolutionary advantage acquired by the metastatic tumors, rendering them capable of partly repairing the DNA damage induced by chemotherapy and resulting in chemoresistance. This hypothesis underscores an active role of the missense variant in the tumorigenic phenotype.
Remarkably, at least six FA cases of biallelic BRCA2 patients due to the combination of one clearly deleterious allele and one missense allele have been previously reported6. Three of the variants, p.(Lys2729Asn), p.(Asn372His), and p.(Ile2490Thr) showed functional HRR19,20 and they appear classified in ClinVar as “Benign” (by expert review), implying that were probably not the second causal variants in these FA-D1 patient6. The variants, p.(Leu2510Pro) and p.(Trp2626Cys) were able to partially rescue the lethality of Brca2-null (Brca2KO/KO) ES cells, but with a 70–80% reduction in the number of colonies and an HRR severely impaired19,20. Cells expressing these variants had residual HRR activity, below 5%, and a 20-fold increase in ICLs induced chromosome fragility when compared to the wt BRCA2 expressing cell lines19,20. Similarly, the p.(Arg2336His) variant, due to the c.7007 G > A substitution in DNA, also behaves as a BRCA2 null allele when expressed in ES cells19,20. The c.7007 G > A change is a splicing alteration that generates two frameshift mRNA transcripts (skipping exon 13 and exons 12–13, respectively), with the appearance of an early stop codon in exon 1419,20. Since functional studies demonstrated a deep impairment of HRR20, these last three variants cannot be considered hypomorphic, in agreement with the acute FA phenotype and early cancer predisposition shown by these patients6. In contrast, p.(Glu2599Gly) found in our patient exhibited substantial levels of HRR in all functional assays performed in our study but well below the wt levels (Fig. 2, Fig. 4 and Figure S5), in accordance to recent data21. Moreover, we observed the same intermediate chromosome fragility in both primary lymphocytes and fibroblasts from FA663 patients. This is indicative of a hypomorphic effect of the p.(Glu2599Gly) variant and not of FA somatic mosaicism. Indeed, a diagnosis of FA somatic mosaicism is usually consistent with the presence of higher induced chromosome fragility in patient’s fibroblasts than patient’s lymphocytes12,22,23.
The p.(Glu2599Gly) variant presented by our patient is located in the helical domain (2479 to 2668aa) of the DNA binding region of BRCA2. This domain interacts with DSS124, which promotes the exchange of BRCA2-RPA1 to BRCA2-RAD51 and thus the ssDNA interaction25. The BRCA2 DNA binding domain is also involved in the stabilization of BRCA2 and in the regulation of R-loop-associated DNA damage, a particular source of damage resolved by FA proteins26,27. In addition, it has been shown that hypomorphic missense variants in the DNA binding domain of BRCA2 with partial effects on protein function may confer moderate risks of breast cancer28, being the hypomorphic variants associated with this domain the only missense variants in BRCA2 increasing cancer risk. Although we show that BRCA2 p.(Glu2599Gly) is hypomorphic in terms of DNA repair function, this study cannot provide a quantification of its estimated reduced cancer penetrance, due to the fact that it is presented together with another clearly deleterious variant and the lack of a significant number of patients harboring this missense variant.
Our findings together with two family study cases that reported biallelic BRCA2 patients with a less severe FA phenotype and early onset breast and/or colon cancer susceptibility29,30 are relevant for the interpretation of variants with unknown significance (VUS) in BRCA2. In the evaluation of the potential pathogenicity of a variant in BRCA2, it is considered that its co-occurrence in trans with a clearly pathogenic variant indicates its benign character31. However, our results show that this criterion cannot be applied without careful exploration of the clinical phenotype.
We conclude that the BRCA2 p.(Glu2599Gly) is a truly hypomorphic BRCA2 allele that retains sufficient HRR activity for normal organism development and to minimize FA-related phenotypes, but not enough to avoid early onset of tumorigenesis and severe chemotoxicity. Furthermore, we propose a straightforward methodology that produces conclusive results in a reasonable turnaround time to classify BRCA2 variants of uncertain significance (VUS) in cancer patients.
Methods
Cell lines and cultures
Blood cultures were established from patient FA663: 10% of blood (in heparin) and 90% RPMI (Gibco) with 15% FBS, 1% antibiotics, 1% L-Glutamine, and 1% phytohemaglutinin. Wild type primary fibroblasts were previously established from a 4-year-old patient undergoing phimosis surgery; homozygous BRCA2 c.469 A > T, p.Lys157* and FA663 primary fibroblasts were established from skin biopsies of patients. Cells were grown in DMEM with 20% FBS (Biowest) and antibiotics. Human cell lines HEK293T (Human Embryonic Kidney 293 T cells, ATCC CRL–11268) were cultured in DMEM 10% FBS and antibiotics.
Chromosome fragility assays and G2/M cell cycle arrest
For the Chromosome fragility test, peripheral blood T-lymphocytes and primary fibroblasts were treated with diepoxybutane (DEB) at the indicated concentrations and processed as in11,32. For the G2/M cell cycle arrest analysis, primary fibroblasts were treated with Mitomycin-C at the indicated concentrations and processed as in32.
RAD51 foci formation
75000 fibroblast cells were grown on 4-well Millicell EZ slide units (Merck Millipore) and irradiated with 5 Gy. Cells were fixed with 4% formaldehyde in PBS (Quimigen), incubated in Triton X-100 0.5%, and blocked with 10% BSA (Sigma) TPBS. Slides were incubated with RAD51 antibody (H-92, 8349 Santa Cruz) diluted 1:500 overnight at 4 °C, washed and incubated for 30 min at 37 °C with anti-rabbit Alexa 568 conjugated secondary antibody (Molecular Probes) diluted 1:500. Coverslips were mounted in Vectashield Mounting Medium (H-1000, Vector Laboratories, Inc.), containing DAPI. 300000 HEK293T cells were seeded on coverslips (previously coated with Poly-L-Lysine) in 6 cm Petri dishes and the same procedure was followed.
RAD51 on formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) samples
The homologous recombination repair activity was assessed on FFPE tumor samples as previously described33,34. In brief, γH2AX and RAD51 foci were determined in cells in the S/G2-phase of the cell cycle (geminin-positive). The following primary antibodies were diluted in DAKO Antibody Diluent (K8006) and incubated at room temperature for 1 h: rabbit anti-RAD51 (Abcam ab133534, 1:1000), mouse anti-geminin (NovoCastra NCL-L, 1:100 in PDX samples, 1:60 in patient samples), rabbit anti-geminin (ProteinTech 10802-1-AP, 1:400) and mouse anti-phospho-H2AX (Millipore #05-636, 1:200). Secondary antibodies were diluted in blocking buffer and incubated for 30 min: goat anti-rabbit IgG Alexa fluor 568 (Invitrogen A11011; 1:500), goat anti-mouse IgG Alexa fluor 488 (Invitrogen A11001; 1:500), donkey anti-mouse IgG Alexa fluor 568 (Invitrogen A10037; 1:500), and goat anti-rabbit IgG Alexa fluor 488 (Invitrogen A11008; 1:500). Finally, sections were dehydrated and mounted with DAPI ProLong Gold antifade reagent (ThermoFisher P36941). Scoring was performed blindly using a 60×-immersion oil objective with a Nikon Eclipse Ti-E microscope. The amount of dsDNA damage served as a quality check and was quantified by scoring the percentage of geminin-positive cells with γ-H2AX foci. The RAD51 score was obtained by quantifying the percentage of geminin-positive cells with 5 or more nuclear foci. A pre-defined cut-off of 10% was used for RAD51 to differentiate between homologous recombination deficient (HRD) and proficient (HRP) tumors33,34.
PARPi survival assays
1000 fibroblast cells (wt, BRCA2 and FA663) were seeded on 96-well plates and treated with 0, 0.5, 5, 50, 500, and 5000 nM Olaparib (Selleckchem) or 0, 50, 500, 5000, and 50000 nM Veliparib (Deltaclon S.L.). Cells were fixed adding 10% trichloroacetic (TCA) (Sigma) solution, stained with 0.4% Sulforhodamine B (Sigma) acetic acid, and resuspended with 10 mM Tris (Sigma) solution. OD has measured 510 nm with a microplate reader (Multiskan Sky Touch Drop plate, ref51119600DP).
BRCA2 mutant cell line generation
The selected plasmid to generate CRISPRs constructs was pX330 (pX330 – U6 – Chimeric_BB-CBh-HSpCas9, Addgene 42230)35. Selected sequence to target BRCA2 is GTTGATTTCCAGTACCAACT, located in exon 11 and previously described35. Primers used for CRISPR pX330 plasmid generation are forward 5’-caccgttgatttccagtaccaact and reverse 5’-aaacagttggtactggaaatcaac. Three days after, cells were analyzed by flow cytometry using the FACSAria II (BD Biosciences) and RFP+ GFP+ cells were sorted. Clones were analyzed by WB and genotyped with forward 5’-tcagactgcaagtgggaaaa-3’ and reverse 5’-ggtctttacaggcctctctgt-3’ primers.
BRCA2 plasmids
Human BRCA2 cDNA (NM_000059) was cloned in the pcDNA3 vector (Invitrogen). The two BRCA2 deleterious variants were introduced in the pcDNA3-BRCA2 plasmid using the QuikChange II XL Site-Directed Mutagenesis Kit (Agilent) using for p.(Ile605Asnfs*11) variant forward 5’-ctatacatgatgaaacatcttataaaggaaaaaaaataaccgaaagaccaaaaatca and reverse 5’-tgatttttggtctttcggttattttttttcctttataagatgtttcatcatgtatag primers and for p.(Glu2599Gly) variant forward 5’-acacagagccctataaaatccttcttttccagcctttcc- and reverse 5’-ggaaaggctggaaaagaaggattttatagggctctgtgt primers.
Plasmid transfection
Transfections were carried out using 10 μL Lipofectamine 2000 (Life Technologies) and 250 μL Optimem (Life Technologies) plus 10 μg of each pCDNA3 plasmid construct the day after plating 600000 HEK293T cells/well in 6-well plates with complete medium.
Western blot antibodies
Primary antibodies used were Rabbit anti-BRCA2 (Ab123491, Abcam) and mouse anti-vinculin (Ab18058, Abcam) were diluted 1:1000 and 1:2500, respectively; and secondary antibodies, goat anti-rabbit of (Bethyl Laboratories, Inc.) and goat anti-mouse (Santa Cruz), both diluted 1:2000.
HRR assay
HRR assay was performed as in36 with some modifications: 200000 cells HEK293T expressing pDR-GFP construct in a stable manner were seeded in 12-well plates. pCDNA3 plasmids were co-expressed with an I-SceI expressing plasmid by transient transfection. HR-dependent repair of I-SceI induced DNA double-strand breaks was quantified by fluorescence-activated cell sorting (FACS) of GFP + cells after 48 h.
Generation of PDX models
Biopsy specimens from metastatic lesions were immediately implanted into the lower flank of 5-week-old female NOD SCID GAMMA mice (NSG, Charles River) and then expanded in NMRI-Foxn1nu/nu mice (NMRI, Janvier Labs). This procedure was conducted following the European Union’s animal care directive (2010/63/EU) and was approved by the Ethical Committee of Animal Experimentation of the Vall d’Hebron Research Institute.
BRCA2 mRNA expression
RNA was extracted from PDX samples (15–30 mg) by using the PerfectPure RNA Tissue kit (five Prime). cDNA was obtained using the PrimeScript RT Reagent kit (Takara). Quantitative RT-qPCR was performed in a 7900HT Fast Real-Time PCR System (Applied Biosystems) using TaqMan Universal Master Mix II (Applied Biosystems) and predesigned human-specific primers and TaqMan probes (Hs99999908 for GUSB, Hs99999903 for ACTB, and Hs01037414 for BRCA2). The comparative CT method was used for data analysis, in which geNorm algorithms were applied to select the most stably expressed housekeeping genes (GUSB and ACTB) and geometric means were calculated to obtain normalized CT values37.
In silico prediction tools
The in silico prediction of functional impact of the missense BRCA2 c.7796 A > G variant was performed using BRASS (a specific tool for BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes; https://www.biotoclin.org/BRASS#top)38 and Alamut software v2.10 (Interactive Biosoftware) that includes three protein-function prediction tools: Align-GVGD, (http://agvgd.hci.utah.edu/agvgd_input.php), SIFT (https://sift.bii.a-star.edu.sg/), and PolyPhen-2 (http://genetics.bwh.harvard.edu/pph2/).
DNA extraction and genetic variant screening
Genomic DNA was extracted from patient peripheral blood and skin biopsy samples using Puregene Genome DNA Purification Kit (Gentra System). DNA from tumor FFPE samples was extracted either with Maxwell®16 FFPE Plus LEV DNA Purification Kit (Promega Corp.) or QIAamp DNA FFPE Tissue Kit (QIAGEN). DNA from fresh or frozen tissues was isolated using DNeasy blood and tissue kit (QIAGEN). Exome sequencing procedure was performed as described in13.
The BRCA2 variants c.1813dup (exon 10; forward 5’-gcctctgaaagtggactgga-3’ and reverse 5’-aaaaacacagaaggaatcgtca-3’) and c.7796 A > G (exon 16; forward 5’-gtgtgatacatgtttactttaaattg-3’ and reverse 5’-gttcgagagacagttaagagaag-3’) were genotyped by PCR of genomic DNA and Sanger sequencing. PCR products were purified using ExoSAP-IT PCR Product Cleanup Reagent (ThermoFisher), sequenced using BigDye Terminator v3.1 Cycle Sequencing kit (Applied Biosystems) and run in a Genetic Analyzer ABI3130xl (Applied Biosystems). Reference transcript BRCA2 NM_000059.3 was used for sequence alignment and variant annotation.
RNA extraction, reverse transcription and cDNA amplification
RNA was isolated from patient’s peripheral blood samples and cultured fibroblasts using Trizol Isolation Reagent (ThermoFisher Scientific). RNA was cleaned up using Rneasy Minikit (QIAGEN) and digested with RNase-Free DNase Set (QIAGEN) to remove genomic DNA. A total of 500 ng were reverse transcribed with PrimeScript RT reagent kit (Takara) that supplies random and oligo-dT primers. BRCA2 cDNA was amplified in two PCR fragments spanning exons 10 to 14 (forward 5’-tatgtccaaatttaattgataat-3’ and reverse 5’-ttggtctgcctgtagtaatc-3’) and 11 to 18 (forward 5’-ttctgatgttcctgtgaaaacaa-3’ and reverse 5’-attctggggcttcaagaggt-3’), respectively, using Expand™ Long Template PCR System (Roche). Sequencing was performed with BigDye Terminator v3.1 Cycle Sequencing kit (Applied Biosystems) in a Genetic Analyzer ABI 3130xl (Applied Biosystems). Sanger electropherograms were visualized using SeqScape v2.6 and Sequencing Analysis v2.6 softwares (Applied Biosystems).
DNA copy number analysis by multiplex ligation-dependent probe assay (MLPA)
Allelic copy number changes in BRCA2 were performed by MLPA kit #P090 (MRC-Holland), and resulting electrophoresis on an ABI 3130xl capillary sequencer (Applied Biosystems). Analysis was done using Coffalyser.Net software (MRC-Holland, Amsterdam, The Netherlands). Blood samples from healthy donors were included for sample normalization.
Ethics approval
Patient blood and samples collection was carried out under patient consent and the positive approval of the Clinical Research Ethics Committee of Vall d’Hebron Hospital (Barcelona, Spain), project number PR(AG)64/2007. Fresh primary or metastatic tumor samples were collected prospectively for implantation into nude mice at VHIO under an institutional review board (IRB)-approved protocol and the associated informed consent, project number PR(AG)173-2015. The experiments conformed to the principles of the WMA Declaration of Helsinki and the Department of Health and Human Services Belmont Report.
Animal experiments were conducted following the European Union’s animal care directive (2010/63/EU) and the protocols were approved by the Ethical Committee of Animal Experimentation of the Vall d’Hebron Research Institute and the appropriate governmental agency and carried out in accordance with the approved guidelines.
Consent to participate
Written informed consent was obtained from the patient for publication of this case report. The Clinical Research Ethics Committee of Vall d’Hebron Hospital (Barcelona, Spain) approved the study.
Reporting summary
Further information on research design is available in the Nature Research Reporting Summary linked to this article.
Data availability
The datasets generated and/or analysed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.
References
Nalepa, G. & Clapp, D. W. Fanconi anaemia and cancer: an intricate relationship. Nat. Rev. Cancer 18, 168–185 (2018).
Bogliolo, M. & Surrallés, J. Fanconi anemia: a model disease for studies on human genetics and advanced therapeutics. Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev. 33, 32–40 (2015).
Chen, C. C., Feng, W., Lim, P. X., Kass, E. M. & Jasin, M. Homology-directed repair and the role of BRCA1, BRCA2, and related proteins in genome integrity and cancer. Annu. Rev. Cancer Biol. 2, 313–336 (2018).
Prakash, R., Zhang, Y., Feng, W. & Jasin, M. Homologous recombination and human health: The roles of BRCA1, BRCA2, and associated proteins. Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Biol. (2015) https://doi.org/10.1101/cshperspect.a016600.
Howlett, N. G. et al. Biallelic inactivation of BRCA2 in Fanconi anemia. Science 297, 606–609 (2002).
Alter, B. P., Rosenberg, P. S. & Brody, L. C. Clinical and molecular features associated with biallelic mutations in FANCD1/BRCA2. J. Med. Genet. 44, 1–9 (2006).
Myers, K. et al. The clinical phenotype of children with Fanconi anemia caused by biallelic FANCD1/BRCA2 mutations. Pediatr. Blood Cancer 58, 462–465 (2012).
Wagner, J. E. et al. Germline mutations in BRCA2: shared genetic susceptibility to breast cancer, early onset leukemia, and Fanconi anemia. Blood 103, 3226–3229 (2004).
Meyer, S. et al. Fanconi anaemia, BRCA2 mutations and childhood cancer: a developmental perspective from clinical and epidemiological observations with implications for genetic counselling. J. Med. Genet. 51, 71–75 (2014).
Pierce, A. J., Johnson, R. D., Thompson, L. H. & Jasin, M. XRCC3 promotes homology-directed repair of DNA damage in mammalian cells. Genes Dev. 13, 2633–2638 (1999).
Castella, M. et al. Chromosome fragility in patients with Fanconi anaemia: diagnostic implications and clinical impact. J. Med. Genet. 48, 242–250 (2011).
Nicoletti, E. et al. Mosaicism in Fanconi anemia: concise review and evaluation of published cases with focus on clinical course of blood count normalization. Ann. Hematol. 99, 913–924 (2020).
Bogliolo, M. et al. Optimised molecular genetic diagnostics of Fanconi anaemia by whole exome sequencing and functional studies. J. Med. Genet. 57, 258–268 (2020).
Rahman, N. & Stratton, M. R. The genetics of breast cancer susceptibility. Annu. Rev. Genet. (1998) https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.genet.32.1.95.
Richards, S. et al. Standards and guidelines for the interpretation of sequence variants: a joint consensus recommendation of the american college of medical genetics and genomics and the association for molecular pathology. Genet. Med. 17, 405–424 (2015).
Soulier, J. et al. Detection of somatic mosaicism and classification of Fanconi anemia patients by analysis of the FA/BRCA pathway. Blood (2005) https://doi.org/10.1182/blood-2004-05-1852.
Sharan, S. K. et al. Embryonic lethality and radiation hypersensitivity mediated by Rad51 in mice lacking Brca2. Nature 386, 804–810 (1997).
Matsuda, D., Sato, H. & Maquat, L. E. Chapter 9 Studying Nonsense-Mediated mRNA Decay in Mammalian Cells. in Methods Enzymology (2008). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0076-6879(08)02409-9.
Mesman, R. L. S. et al. The functional impact of variants of uncertain significance in BRCA2. Genet. Med. (2019) https://doi.org/10.1038/s41436-018-0052-2.
Biswas, K. et al. A comprehensive functional characterization of BRCA2 variants associated with Fanconi anemia using mouse ES cell-based assay. Blood 118, 2430–2442 (2011).
Richardson, M. E. et al. Strong functional data for pathogenicity or neutrality classify BRCA2 DNA-binding-domain variants of uncertain significance. Am. J. Hum. Genet. (2021) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajhg.2021.02.005.
Oostra, A. B., Nieuwint, A. W. M., Joenje, H. & De Winter, J. P. Diagnosis of fanconi anemia: chromosomal breakage analysis. Anemia 2012, 238731 (2012).
Pinto, F. O. et al. Diagnosis of fanconi anemia in patients with bone marrow failure. Haematologica 94, 487–495 (2009).
Yang, H. et al. BRCA2 function in DNA binding and recombination from a BRCA2-DSS1-ssDNA Structure. Science 297, 1837–1848 (2002).
Zhao, W. et al. Promotion of BRCA2-Dependent Homologous Recombination by DSS1 via RPA Targeting and DNA Mimicry. Mol. Cell (2015) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molcel.2015.05.032.
Bhatia, V. et al. BRCA2 prevents R-loop accumulation and associates with TREX-2 mRNA export factor PCID2. Nature 511, 362–365 (2014).
Schwab, R. A. et al. The fanconi anemia pathway maintains genome stability by coordinating replication and transcription. Mol. Cell 60, 351–361 (2015).
Shimelis, H. et al. BRCA2 hypomorphic missense variants confer moderate risks of breast cancer. Cancer Res. 77, 2789–2799 (2017).
Degrolard-Courcet, E. et al. Development of primary early-onset colorectal cancers due to biallelic mutations of the FANCD1/BRCA2 gene. Eur. J. Hum. Genet. 22, 979–987 (2014).
Gay-Bellile, M. et al. Is BRCA2 involved in early onset colorectal cancer risk? Clinical Genetics (2020) https://doi.org/10.1111/cge.13679.
Easton, D. F. et al. A systematic genetic assessment of 1,433 sequence variants of unknown clinical significance in the BRCA1 and BRCA2 breast cancer-predisposition genes. Am. J. Hum. Genet. (2007) https://doi.org/10.1086/521032.
Bogliolo, M. et al. Mutations in ERCC4, encoding the DNA-repair endonuclease XPF, cause Fanconi anemia. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 92, 800–806 (2013).
Castroviejo‐Bermejo, M. et al. A RAD 51 assay feasible in routine tumor samples calls PARP inhibitor response beyond BRCA mutation. EMBO Mol. Med. (2018) https://doi.org/10.15252/emmm.201809172.
Cruz, C. et al. RAD51 foci as a functional biomarker of homologous recombination repair and PARP inhibitor resistance in germline BRCA-mutated breast cancer. Ann. Oncol. (2018) https://doi.org/10.1093/annonc/mdy099.
Cong, L. et al. Multiplex genome engineering using CRISPR/Cas systems. Science 339, 819–823 (2013).
Hernández, G. et al. Decapping protein EDC4 regulates DNA repair and phenocopies BRCA1. Nat. Commun. (2018) https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-018-03433-3.
Vandesompele, J. et al. Accurate normalization of real-time quantitative RT-PCR data by geometric averaging of multiple internal control genes. Genome Biol. 3, RESEARCH0034 (2002).
Padilla, N. et al. BRCA1- and BRCA2-specific in silico tools for variant interpretation in the CAGI 5 ENIGMA challenge. Hum. Mutat. 40, 1593–1611 (2019).
Acknowledgements
The authors thank the patient and her family. The authors thank Dr. Detlev Schindler for providing the primary BRCA2-defective fibroblast cell line (c.469 A > T, p.Lys157*). Surrallés laboratory is supported by ICREA-Academia programme, Spanish Ministry of Health (projects FANCOSTEM and FANCOLEN), Spanish Ministry of Science, Innovation, and Universities (projects CB06/07/0023 MCI, UE and RTI2018-098419-B-I00 MCI, UE), European Commission (EUROFANCOLEN project HEALTH-F5-2012-305421), Fanconi Anemia Research Fund Inc and the’Fondo Europeo de Desarrollo Regional, una manera de hacer Europa’ (FEDER). This work was also funded by intramural actions (ACCI-U705/U745-2018 to JS and AL) of CIBERER. CIBERER is an initiative of the Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Spain. The VHIO authors acknowledge the Cellex Foundation for providing research facilities and thank CERCA Programme/Generalitat de Catalunya for institutional support. Part of this work was supported by the Spanish Instituto de Salud Carlos III (ISCIII) funding (PI16/01218 and PI19/01303 to SG-E, PI12/02606 to JB and PI17/01080 to VS), an initiative of the Spanish Ministry of Economy and Innovation partially supported by European Regional Development FEDER Funds. SG-E and VS are supported by the ISCIII Miguel Servet Program (CP16/00034 and CPII19/00033). SB is a recipient of Asociación Española Contra el Cáncer (AECC) fellowship. ALG is a recipient of a PERIS fellowship (Generalitat de Catalunya) and innovation funds from the CaixaImpulse program. VS is the recipient of an AGAUR (2017 SGR 540), an AECC (LABAE16020PORTT), and an ERAPERMED2019-215 grant. LC-R contract is supported by the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under Marie Skłodowska-Curie grant agreement No 665919.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
JB and JS conceived this manuscript. LC-R and S G-E contributed equally to this work. LC-R, MA-C, RP, NM-S, and MJR performed and analysed PARPi survivals, western blot, immunostainings, DR-GFP, and cell cycle experiments with fibroblasts. MB completed Exome Sequencing (ES) experiments. MA-C established the BRCA2 KO HEK293T cell line. RP analyzed and interpreted the patient data regarding chromosome fragility tests (CFT) in blood T-lymphocytes and fibroblasts. SG-E, SB, EC, GM, CC, AL-G, CS, AL, VS, OD contributed with patient samples, experimental data, and animal experiments. LC-R, SG-E, and MB were major contributors in writing the paper. All authors read and approved the final paper.
Corresponding authors
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary information
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Castells-Roca, L., Gutiérrez-Enríquez, S., Bonache, S. et al. Clinical consequences of BRCA2 hypomorphism. npj Breast Cancer 7, 117 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41523-021-00322-9
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41523-021-00322-9