Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Brief Communication
  • Published:

Convergence in water use efficiency within plant functional types across contrasting climates

Abstract

Water use efficiency (WUE) provides a direct measure of the inextricable link between plant carbon uptake and water loss, and it can be used to study how ecosystem function varies with climate. We analysed WUE data from the ECOsystem Spaceborne Thermal Radiometer Experiment on Space Station (ECOSTRESS), leveraging the high spatial resolution of ECOSTRESS to study the distribution of WUE values both within and among regions with different plant functional types. Our results indicate that despite wide local variability of WUE estimates, WUE tended to converge to common global optima (peaked distributions with variance <0.5ā€‰gā€‰C per kg H2O, kurtosis >3.0) for five of nine plant functional types (grassland, permanent wetland, savannah, deciduous broadleaf and deciduous needleleaf forest), and this convergence occurred in functional types that spanned distinct geographic regions and climates.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Fig. 1: Insight into ecosystem WUE from ECOSTRESS.
Fig. 2: Convergence in WUE within PFTs across contrasting climates.

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

All data used in this study are publicly available on the NASA/USGS Land Processes Distributed Active Archive Center. The data can be spatially and temporally subset and retrieved via the Application for Extracting and Exploring Analysis Ready Samples (AĻĻEEARS) at https://lpdaac.usgs.gov/tools/appeears/.

Code availability

All code used in this study is available upon request.

References

  1. Arneth, A. et al. Terrestrial biogeochemical feedbacks in the climate system. Nat. Geosci. 3, 525ā€“532 (2010).

    ArticleĀ  CASĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  2. Green, J. K. et al. Regionally strong feedbacks between the atmosphere and terrestrial biosphere. Nat. Geosci. 10, 410ā€“414 (2017).

    ArticleĀ  CASĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  3. Heimann, M. & Reichstein, M. Terrestrial ecosystem carbon dynamics and climate feedbacks. Nature 451, 289ā€“292 (2008).

    ArticleĀ  CASĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  4. Beer, C. et al. Temporal and among-site variability of inherent water use efficiency at the ecosystem level. Glob. Biogeochem. Cycles 23, 1ā€“13 (2009).

    ArticleĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  5. Keenan, T. F. et al. Increase in forest water-use efficiency as atmospheric carbon dioxide concentrations rise. Nature 499, 324ā€“327 (2013).

    ArticleĀ  CASĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  6. Frank, D. C. et al. Water-use efficiency & transpiration across European forests during the Anthropocene. Nat. Clim. Change 5, 579ā€“583 (2015).

    ArticleĀ  CASĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  7. Mastrotheodoros, T. et al. Linking plant functional trait plasticity and the large increase in forest water use efficiency. J. Geophys. Res. Biogeosci. 122, 2393ā€“2408 (2017).

    ArticleĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  8. Lavergne, A. et al. Observed and modelled historical trends in the water-use efficiency of plants and ecosystems. Glob. Change Biol. 25, 2242ā€“2257 (2019).

    ArticleĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  9. Huxman, T. E. et al. Convergence across biomes to a common rain-use efficiency. Nature 429, 651ā€“654 (2004).

    ArticleĀ  CASĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  10. Yang, Y. et al. Contrasting responses of water use efficiency to drought across global terrestrial ecosystems. Sci. Rep. 6, 23284 (2016).

    ArticleĀ  CASĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  11. Huang, L. et al. A global examination of the response of ecosystem water-use efficiency to drought based on MODIS data. Sci. Total Environ. 601ā€“602, 1097ā€“1107 (2017).

    ArticleĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  12. Reichstein, M. et al. Severe drought effects on ecosystem CO2 and H2O fluxes at three Mediterranean evergreen sites: revision of current hypotheses? Glob. Change Biol. 8, 999ā€“1017 (2002).

    ArticleĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  13. Reichstein, M. et al. Inverse modeling of seasonal drought effects on canopy CO2/H2O exchange in three Mediterranean ecosystems. J. Geophys. Res. Atmos. 108, 4726 (2003).

    ArticleĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  14. Cooley, S. S. et al. Assessing regional drought impacts on vegetation and evapotranspiration: a case study in Guanacaste, Costa Rica. Ecol. Appl. 29, e01834 (2019).

    ArticleĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  15. Medrano, H., Flexas, J. & GalmĆ©s, J. Variability in water use efficiency at the leaf level among Mediterranean plants with different growth forms. Plant Soil 317, 17ā€“29 (2008).

    ArticleĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  16. Soh, W. K. et al. Rising CO2 drives divergence in water use efficiency of evergreen and deciduous plants. Sci. Adv. 5, eaax7906 (2019).

    ArticleĀ  CASĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  17. Wang, M., Chen, Y., Wu, X. & Bai, Y. Forest-type-dependent water use efficiency trends across the northern hemisphere. Geophys. Res. Lett. 45, 8283ā€“8293 (2018).

    ArticleĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  18. Enquist, B. et al. Scaling from traits to ecosystems: developing a general trait driver theory via integrating trait-based and metabolic scaling theories. Adv. Ecol. Res. 52, 249ā€“318 (2015).

    ArticleĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  19. Gross, N. et al. Functional trait diversity maximizes ecosystem multifunctionality. Nat. Ecol. Evol. 1, 0132 (2017).

    ArticleĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  20. Bagousseā€Pinguet, Y. L. et al. Testing the environmental filtering concept in global drylands. J. Ecol. 105, 1058ā€“1069 (2017).

    ArticleĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  21. Ponce Campos, G. E. et al. Ecosystem resilience despite large-scale altered hydroclimatic conditions. Nature 494, 349ā€“352 (2013).

    ArticleĀ  CASĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  22. Fisher, J. B. et al. The future of evapotranspiration: global requirements for ecosystem functioning, carbon and climate feedbacks, agricultural management, and water resources. Water Resour. Res. 53, 2618ā€“2626 (2017).

    ArticleĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  23. Xue, B.-L. et al. Global patterns, trends, and drivers of water use efficiency from 2000 to 2013. Ecosphere 6, art174 (2015).

    ArticleĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  24. Fisher, J. B. et al. ECOSTRESS: NASAā€™s next generation mission to measure evapotranspiration from the International Space Station. Water Resour. Res. 56, e2019WR026058 (2020).

    ArticleĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  25. Higgins, M. A. et al. Geological control of floristic composition in Amazonian forests. J. Biogeogr. 38, 2136ā€“2149 (2011).

    ArticleĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  26. De Kauwe, M. G., Keenan, T. F., Medlyn, B. E., Prentice, I. C. & Terrer, C. Satellite based estimates underestimate the effect of CO2 fertilization on net primary productivity. Nat. Clim. Change 6, 892ā€“893 (2016).

    ArticleĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  27. Huang, M. et al. Seasonal responses of terrestrial ecosystem water-use efficiency to climate change. Glob. Change Biol. 22, 2165ā€“2177 (2016).

    ArticleĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  28. Lin, Y.-S. et al. Optimal stomatal behaviour around the world. Nat. Clim. Change 5, 459ā€“464 (2015).

    ArticleĀ  CASĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  29. Medlyn, B. E. et al. Reconciling the optimal and empirical approaches to modelling stomatal conductance. Glob. Change Biol. 17, 2134ā€“2144 (2011).

    ArticleĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  30. Peters, W. et al. Increased water-use efficiency and reduced CO2 uptake by plants during droughts at a continental scale. Nat. Geosci. 11, 744ā€“748 (2018).

    ArticleĀ  CASĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  31. Cheng, L. et al. Recent increases in terrestrial carbon uptake at little cost to the water cycle. Nat. Commun. 8, 110 (2017).

    ArticleĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  32. Fisher, J. B. ECOsystem Spaceborne Thermal Radiometer Experiment on Space Station (ECOSTRESS): Level-3 Evapotranspiration L3(ET_PT-JPL) Algorithm Theoretical Basis Document. Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology (2018).

  33. Running, S. W. et al. A continuous satellite-derived measure of global terrestrial primary production. BioScience 54, 547ā€“560 (2004).

    ArticleĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  34. Heinsch, F. et al. Evaluation of remote sensing based terrestrial productivity from MODIS using regional tower eddy flux network observations. IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens. 44, 1908ā€“1925 (2006).

    ArticleĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  35. Zhao, M., Heinsch, F., Nemani, R. & Running, S. Improvements of the MODIS terrestrial gross and net primary production global data set. Remote Sens. Environ. 95, 164ā€“176 (2005).

    ArticleĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  36. Ryu, Y. et al. Integration of MODIS land and atmosphere products with a coupled-process model to estimate gross primary productivity and evapotranspiration from 1 km to global scales. Glob. Biogeochem. Cycles 25, GB4017 (2011).

    ArticleĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank M. Sikka, W. AssunĆ§Ć£o, G. Halverson, L. Sanchez and D. Menge for their assistance, as well as the Menge Laboratory. The research was carried out at the Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, under a contract with the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA). Government sponsorship acknowledged. Support was provided by the ECOSTRESS mission (S.S.C. and J.B.F.) and by the NASA Research Opportunities in Space and Earth Science grant no. 80NSSC20K0216 (G.R.G.).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

All authors performed the literature review. J.B.F. first conceptualized the study. All authors contributed to designing the methodology. S.S.C. conducted all data analysis, performed all statistical tests and generated the figures. All authors wrote and edited the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Joshua B. Fisher.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Peer review

Peer review information

Nature Plants thanks Andrew Feldman, Alienor Lavergne and the other, anonymous, reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work.

Additional information

Publisherā€™s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Information

Supplementary Discussion Sections 1ā€“9, Tables 1ā€“6, Figs. 1ā€“4 and references.

Reporting Summary

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Cooley, S.S., Fisher, J.B. & Goldsmith, G.R. Convergence in water use efficiency within plant functional types across contrasting climates. Nat. Plants 8, 341ā€“345 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41477-022-01131-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41477-022-01131-z

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter ā€” what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing