Self-fertilization (also known as selfing) is an important reproductive strategy in plants and a widely applied tool for plant genetics and plant breeding. Selfing can lead to inbreeding depression by uncovering recessive deleterious variants, unless these variants are purged by selection. Here we investigated the dynamics of purging in a set of eleven maize lines that were selfed for six generations. We show that heterozygous, putatively deleterious single nucleotide polymorphisms are preferentially lost from the genome during selfing. Deleterious single nucleotide polymorphisms were lost more rapidly in regions of high recombination, presumably because recombination increases the efficacy of selection by uncoupling linked variants. Overall, heterozygosity decreased more slowly than expected, by an estimated 35% to 40% per generation instead of the expected 50%, perhaps reflecting pervasive associative overdominance. Finally, three lines exhibited marked decreases in genome size due to the purging of transposable elements. Genome loss was more likely to occur for lineages that began with larger genomes with more transposable elements and chromosomal knobs. These three lines purged an average of 398 Mb from their genomes, an amount equivalent to three Arabidopsis thaliana genomes per lineage, in only a few generations.
Subscribe to Journal
Get full journal access for 1 year
only $4.92 per issue
All prices are NET prices.
VAT will be added later in the checkout.
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
Rent or Buy article
Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.
All prices are NET prices.
Sequence data that support the findings of this study have been deposited in NCBI Short Read Archive under project code SRP158803. The gff files used in this study, the GS flow cytometry data and the raw mapping count data are available on figshare.com (https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.783825.v2) or from the corresponding author. The SNP VCF files and dataset are available from the corresponding authors upon request.
Custom code used in SNP analyses is available from the corresponding authors upon request.
Darwin, C. The Effects of Self and Cross Fertilization in the Vegetable Kingdom (John Murray, 1876).
Fisher, R. A. Average excess and average effect of a gene substitution. Ann. Hum. Genet. 11, 53–63 (1941).
Charlesworth, D. & Willis, J. H. The genetics of inbreeding depression. Nat. Rev. Genet 10, 783–796 (2009).
Hedrick, P. W., Hellsten, U. & Grattapaglia, D. Examining the cause of high inbreeding depression: analysis of whole-genome sequence data in 28 selfed progeny of Eucalyptus grandis. New Phytol. 209, 600–611 (2016).
Schnable, P. S. & Springer, N. M. Progress toward understanding heterosis in crop plants. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol. 64, 71–88 (2013).
Byers, D. L. & Waller, D. M. Do plant populations purge their genetic load? Effects of population size and mating history on inbreeding depression. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 30, 479–513 (1999).
Rodgers-Melnick, E. et al. Recombination in diverse maize is stable, predictable, and associated with genetic load. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 112, 3823–3828 (2015).
McMullen, M. D. et al. Genetic properties of the maize nested association mapping population. Science 325, 737–740 (2009).
Barrière, A. et al. Detecting heterozygosity in shotgun genome assemblies: lessons from obligately outcrossing nematodes. Genome Res. 19, 470–480 (2009).
Brandenburg, J. T. et al. Independent introductions and admixtures have contributed to adaptation of European maize and its American counterparts. PLoS Genet. 13, e1006666 (2017).
Crnokrak, P. & Barrett, S. C. Perspective: purging the genetic load: a review of the experimental evidence. Evolution 56, 2347–2358 (2002).
Lande, R. & Schemske, D. W. The evolution of self-fertilization and inbreeding depression in plants. I. Genetic models. Evolution 39, 24–40 (1985).
Charlesworth, B., Charlesworth, D. & Morgan, M. T. Genetic loads and estimates of mutation rates in highly inbred plant populations. Nature 347, 380–382 (1990).
Arunkumar, R., Ness, R. W., Wright, S. I. & Barrett, S. C. The evolution of selfing is accompanied by reduced efficacy of selection and purging of deleterious mutations. Genetics 199, 817–829 (2015).
Liu, Q., Zhou, Y., Morrell, P. L. & Gaut, B. S. Deleterious variants in Asian rice and the potential cost of domestication. Mol. Biol. Evol. 34, 908–924 (2017).
Kardos, M., Taylor, H. R., Ellegren, H., Luikart, G. & Allendorf, F. W. Genomics advances the study of inbreeding depression in the wild. Evol. Appl. 9, 1205–1218 (2016).
Morran, L. T., Ohdera, A. H. & Phillips, P. C. Purging deleterious mutations under self fertilization: paradoxical recovery in fitness with increasing mutation rate in Caenorhabditis elegans. PLoS ONE 5, e14473 (2010).
Hill, W. G. & Robertson, A. The effect of linkage on limits to artificial selection. Genet Res. 8, 269–294 (1966).
Tenaillon, M. I., Hollister, J. D. & Gaut, B. S. A triptych of the evolution of plant transposable elements. Trends Plant Sci. 15, 471–478 (2010).
Tenaillon, M. I., Hufford, M. B., Gaut, B. S. & Ross-Ibarra, J. Genome size and transposable element content as determined by high-throughput sequencing in maize and Zea luxurians. Genome Biol. Evol. 3, 219–229 (2011).
Diez, C. M., Meca, E., Tenaillon, M. I. & Gaut, B. S. Three groups of transposable elements with contrasting copy number dynamics and host responses in the maize (Zea mays ssp. mays) genome. PLoS Genet. 10, e1004298 (2014).
Bilinski, P. et al. Parallel altitudinal clines reveal trends in adaptive evolution of genome size in Zea mays . PLoS Genet. 14, e1007162 (2018).
Wright, S. I., Kalisz, S. & Slotte, T. Evolutionary consequences of self-fertilization in plants. Proc. Biol. Sci. 280, 20130133 (2013).
Hollister, J. D. & Gaut, B. S. Epigenetic silencing of transposable elements: a trade-off between reduced transposition and deleterious effects on neighboring gene expression. Genome Res. 19, 1419–1428 (2009).
Lee, Y. C. G. & Karpen, G. H. Pervasive epigenetic effects of Drosophila euchromatic transposable elements impact their evolution. eLife 6, e25762 (2017).
Quadrana, L. The Arabidopsis thaliana mobilome and its impact at the species level. eLife 5, e15716 (2016).
Price, H. J. Evolution of DNA content in higher plants. Bot. Rev. 42, 27 (1976).
Wright, S. I., Ness, R. W., Foxe, J. P. & Barrett, S. C. H. Genomic consequences of outcrossing and selfing in plants. Int. J. Plant Sci. 169, 105–118 (2008).
Fierst, J. L. et al. Reproductive mode and the evolution of genome size and structure in Caenorhabditis nematodes. PLoS Genet. 11, e1005323 (2015).
Wills, D. M. et al. From many, one: genetic control of prolificacy during maize domestication. PLoS Genet. 9, e1003604 (2013).
Diez, C. M. et al. Genome size variation in wild and cultivated maize along altitudinal gradients. New Phytol. 199, 264–276 (2013).
Dolezel, J., Bartos, J., Voglmayr, H. & Greilhuber, J. Nuclear DNA content and genome size of trout and human. Cytom. A 51, 127–128 (2003).
Long, Q. et al. Massive genomic variation and strong selection in Arabidopsis thaliana lines from Sweden. Nat. Genet. 45, 884–890 (2013).
Cullis, C. A. Mechanisms and control of rapid genomic changes in flax. Ann. Bot. 95, 201–206 (2005).
Jian, Y. et al. Maize (Zea mays L.) genome size indicated by 180-bp knob abundance is associated with flowering time. Sci. Rep. 7, 5954 (2017).
Mroczek, R. J., Melo, J. R., Luce, A. C., Hiatt, E. N. & Dawe, R. K. The maize Ab10 meiotic drive system maps to supernumerary sequences in a large complex haplotype. Genetics 174, 145–154 (2006).
Randolph, L. F. Genetic characteristics of the B chromosomes in maize. Genetics 26, 608–631 (1941).
Yamakake, K. & Angel, T. Cytological Studies in Maize (Zea mays L.) and Teosinte (Zea mexicana (Schrader) Kuntze) in Relation to Their Origin and Evolution (Massachusetts Agricultural Experiment Station, 1976).
Simão, F. A., Waterhouse, R. M., Ioannidis, P., Kriventseva, E. V. & Zdobnov, E. M. BUSCO: assessing genome assembly and annotation completeness with single-copy orthologs. Bioinformatics 31, 3210–3212 (2015).
Springer, N. M. et al. The maize W22 genome provides a foundation for functional genomics and transposon biology. Nat. Genet. 50, 1282–1288 (2018).
Devos, K. M., Brown, J. K. & Bennetzen, J. L. Genome size reduction through illegitimate recombination counteracts genome expansion in Arabidopsis. Genome Res. 12, 1075–1079 (2002).
Bousios, A. et al. The turbulent life of Sirevirus retrotransposons and the evolution of the maize genome: more than ten thousand elements tell the story. Plant J. 69, 475–488 (2012).
Darzentas, N., Bousios, A., Apostolidou, V. & Tsaftaris, A. S. MASiVE: Mapping and Analysis of Sirevirus Elements in plant genome sequences. Bioinformatics 26, 2452–2454 (2010).
Ng, P. C. & Henikoff, S. SIFT: predicting amino acid changes that affect protein function. Nucleic Acids Res. 31, 3812–3814 (2003).
Takebayashi, N. & Morrell, P. L. Is self-fertilization an evolutionary dead end? Revisiting an old hypothesis with genetic theories and a macroevolutionary approach. Am. J. Bot. 88, 1143–1150 (2001).
Weller, S. G., Sakai, A. K., Thai, D. A., Tom, J. & Rankin, A. E. Inbreeding depression and heterosis in populations of Schiedea viscosa, a highly selfing species. J. Evol. Biol. 18, 1434–1444 (2005).
Smarda, P., Horova, L., Bures, P., Hralova, I. & Markova, M. Stabilizing selection on genome size in a population of Festuca pallens under conditions of intensive intraspecific competition. New Phytol. 187, 1195–1204 (2010).
Rayburn, A. L., Dudley, J. W. & Biradar, D. P. Selection for early flowering results in simultaneous selection for reduced nuclear-DNA content in maize. Plant Breed. 112, 318–322 (1994).
Sun, S. et al. Extensive intraspecific gene order and gene structural variations between Mo17 and other maize genomes. Nat. Genet. 50, 1289–1295 (2018).
Chia, J. M. et al. Maize HapMap2 identifies extant variation from a genome in flux. Nat. Genet. 44, 803–807 (2012).
Lyu, H., He, Z., Wu, C. I. & Shi, S. Convergent adaptive evolution in marginal environments: unloading transposable elements as a common strategy among mangrove genomes. New Phytol. 217, 428–438 (2018).
Schnable, P. S. et al. The B73 maize genome: complexity, diversity, and dynamics. Science 326, 1112–1115 (2009).
Yin, D. et al. Rapid genome shrinkage in a self-fertile nematode reveals sperm competition proteins. Science 359, 55–61 (2018).
Springer, N. M. & Stupar, R. M. Allelic variation and heterosis in maize: how do two halves make more than a whole? Genome Res. 17, 264–275 (2007).
Gore, M. A. et al. A first-generation haplotype map of maize. Science 326, 1115–1117 (2009).
Charlesworth, B., Morgan, M. T. & Charlesworth, D. The effect of deleterious mutations on neutral molecular variation. Genetics 134, 1289–1303 (1993).
Bersabé, D., Caballero, A., Pérez-Figueroa, A. & García-Dorado, A. On the consequences of purging and linkage on fitness and genetic diversity. G3 6, 171–181 (2015).
Schumer, M. et al. Natural selection interacts with recombination to shape the evolution of hybrid genomes. Science 360, 656–660 (2018).
Tenaillon, M. I., Manicacci, D., Nicolas, S. D., Tardieu, F. & Welcker, C. Testing the link between genome size and growth rate in maize. PeerJ 4, e2408 (2016).
Hu, T. T. et al. The Arabidopsis lyrata genome sequence and the basis of rapid genome size change. Nat. Genet 43, 476–481 (2011).
Beaulieu, J. M., Leitch, I. J., Patel, S., Pendharkar, A. & Knight, C. A. Genome size is a strong predictor of cell size and stomatal density in angiosperms. New Phytol. 179, 975–986 (2008).
Knight, C. A., Molinari, N. A. & Petrov, D. A. The large genome constraint hypothesis: evolution, ecology and phenotype. Ann. Bot. 95, 177–190 (2005).
Charlesworth, D., Charlesworth, B. & Strobeck, C. Selection for recombination in partially self-fertilizing populations. Genetics 93, 237–244 (1979).
Roze, D. & Lenormand, T. Self-fertilization and the evolution of recombination. Genetics 170, 841–857 (2005).
Jiao, Y. et al. Improved maize reference genome with single-molecule technologies. Nature 546, 524–527 (2017).
Li, H. Toward better understanding of artifacts in variant calling from high-coverage samples. Bioinformatics 30, 2843–2851 (2014).
Li, H. et al. The Sequence Alignment/Map format and SAMtools. Bioinformatics 25, 2078–2079 (2009).
Quinlan, A. R. BEDTools: The Swiss-Army tool for genome feature analysis. Curr. Protoc. Bioinforma. 47, 11.12.1–11.12.34 (2014).
Bolger, A. M., Lohse, M. & Usadel, B. Trimmomatic: a flexible trimmer for Illumina sequence data. Bioinformatics 30, 2114–2120 (2014).
DePristo, M. A. et al. A framework for variation discovery and genotyping using next-generation DNA sequencing data. Nat. Genet. 43, 491–498 (2011).
Kumar, P., Henikoff, S. & Ng, P. C. Predicting the effects of coding non-synonymous variants on protein function using the SIFT algorithm. Nat. Protoc. 4, 1073–1081 (2009).
Zhao, H. et al. CrossMap: a versatile tool for coordinate conversion between genome assemblies. Bioinformatics 30, 1006–1007 (2014).
Vaser, R., Adusumalli, S., Leng, S. N., Sikic, M. & Ng, P. C. SIFT missense predictions for genomes. Nat. Protoc. 11, 1–9 (2016).
Scrucca, L., Fop, M., Murphy, T. B. & Raftery, A. E. mclust 5: clustering, classification and density estimation using Gaussian finite mixture models. R J. 8, 289–317 (2016).
A.M. is supported by an EMBO Postdoctoral Fellowship ALTF 775-2017 and by HFSPO Fellowship LT000496/2018-L. A.B. is supported by The Royal Society (award numbers UF160222 and RGF/R1/180006). M.C.S. is supported by an NSF Graduate Research Fellowship to UC Davis (1148897). D.K.S. is supported by a Postdoctoral Fellowship from the National Science Foundation (NSF) Plant Genome Research Program (1609024). J.F.D. is supported by NSF grant IOS 1238014. Q.L. is supported by a National Natural Science Foundation of China grant (no. 31471431) and the Training Program for Outstanding Young Talents of Zhejiang A&F University to Q.L. B.S.G. is supported by NSF grants 1542703 and 1655808.
The authors declare no competing interests.
Publisher’s note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
About this article
Cite this article
Roessler, K., Muyle, A., Diez, C.M. et al. The genome-wide dynamics of purging during selfing in maize. Nat. Plants 5, 980–990 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41477-019-0508-7
Addressing Darwin's dilemma: Can pseudo‐overdominance explain persistent inbreeding depression and load?
Maintenance of Adaptive Dynamics and No Detectable Load in a Range-Edge Outcrossing Plant Population
Molecular Biology and Evolution (2021)
Variance Components and Correlations between Doubled Haploid Lines from Two European Flint Landraces and Their Corresponding Testcrosses for Gibberella Ear Rot Resistance, Silking Time, and Plant Height in Maize
Journal of Heredity (2021)
HapSolo: an optimization approach for removing secondary haplotigs during diploid genome assembly and scaffolding
BMC Bioinformatics (2021)