Correction to: Nature Communications https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-024-47189-5, published online 11 April 2024

The original version of this Article contained an error in Fig. 4. The submitted and peer reviewed versions of this Article contained two distinct “MC3T3-E1” graphs in Fig. 4c, however one of those graphs was inadvertently duplicated during the production process. The correct version of Fig. 4 is:

This has been corrected in both the PDF and HTML versions of the Article.