Abstract
The Pine Island and Thwaites Ice Shelves (PIIS/TIS) in the Amundsen Sea are melting rapidly and impacting global sea levels. The thermocline depth (TD) variability, the interface between cold Winter Water and warm modified Circumpolar Deep Water (mCDW), at the PIIS/TIS front strongly correlates with basal melt rates, but the drivers of its interannual variability remain uncertain. Here, using an ocean model, we propose that the strength of the eastern Amundsen Sea on-shelf circulation primarily controls TD variability and consequent PIIS/TIS melt rates. The TD variability occurs because the on-shelf circulation meanders following the submarine glacial trough, creating vertical velocity through bottom Ekman dynamics. We suggest that a strong or weak ocean circulation, possibly linked to remote winds in the Bellingshausen Sea, generates corresponding changes in bottom Ekman convergence, which modulates mCDW upwelling and TD variability. We show that interannual variability of off-shelf zonal winds has a minor effect on ocean heat intrusion into PIIS/TIS cavities, contrary to the widely accepted concept.
Similar content being viewed by others
Introduction
Ice shelves in the vicinity of Pine Island Bay (PIB) have experienced significant melting in recent decades1,2, contributing to sea level rise3,4. Recent estimates suggest that, from 2012 to 2017, the melting of Pine Island and Thwaites Glaciers has contributed over 0.25 mm annually to global sea-level rise5,6. Prior studies4,7,8,9 have predicted that ice shelf melting and grounding line retreat will accelerate. Because it is grounded below sea level, Thwaites Glacier is believed to be susceptible to irreversible loss of mass with continued rapid acceleration of the ice flow10 and retreat of the ice front11,12 and grounding line13. Substantial retreat of the grounding line raises the possibility of a collapse of Thwaites Glacier, which would account for more than half a metre of future global sea-level rise and destabilise neighbouring glaciers, representing a further 3 m of global sea-level rise14.
Basal melting of Pine Island Ice Shelf and Thwaites Ice Shelf (PIIS/TIS) is primarily caused by heat delivery into the sub-ice shelf cavities by the warm modified Circumpolar Deep Water (mCDW)15,16,17,18. The mCDW crosses the continental shelf break through two main troughs17,19,20, travels a few hundred kilometres on the continental shelf, and then enters the sub-ice shelf cavities21,22,23, thereby contributing to basal melting. The basal melt rates exhibit interannual variability, as revealed by extensive observations over the past 15 years16,21 and with a focus on the years 2009–201424. They are controlled by the amount of mCDW inflow and/or variation in the thermocline depth (TD)15,25,26, where the TD, characterised by a sharp temperature rise with depth, is the interface between cold Winter Water and warm mCDW. The bottom geometry in the PIB, especially the ridge located beneath the PIIS between the inner and outer cavities (red arrow in Fig. 1c), is suggested to play a crucial role in regulating ocean circulation into and out of the sub-ice shelf cavities and controlling ice shelf melting and geometry because (1) the TD determines the shallowest depth of mCDW and (2) bathymetric elevation prevents the densest and warmest mCDW from flowing into sub-PIIS cavities16,21,27. Changes in ocean circulation in front of the cavities or underneath the ice shelves16,23,28,29 and cyclonic and anticyclonic gyres near the ice shelves29 have been reported to have a significant effect on basal melting.
Several mechanisms have been proposed to explain the variability in the mCDW inflow and the TD in the PIB. First, westerly winds can generate dense mCDW moving up onto the shelf and towards the main trough, leading to the accumulation of mCDW in the PIB15,21,30,31; El Niño Southern Oscillation (ENSO)-related westerly winds over the shelf break21,32,33,34 are hypothesised to be linked to the on-shelf flow of mCDW. A strong link between ENSO and ice shelf melting are examined focusing on the variations in both ice shelf thickness and mass35. Several studies19,20,26 have suggested that undercurrents along the outer continental shelf break encounter troughs and turn onshore, causing mCDW onshore intrusion. The undercurrent is suggested to weaken when easterly anomaly winds develop at the shelf break26,36, while the relationship is opposite at a decadal timescale37. Second, the wind-driven Ekman pumping in the continental shelf and at the shelf break are suggested to promote TD fluctuations and enhance onshore volume transport26,38. Third, sea ice formation and cooling due to local air-sea heat exchange within the polynyas in the PIB can drive interannual variability in TD24,39. However, prior modelling studies have not been carried out specifically aiming to reproduce and explain the TD variability in the PIB. Here we hypothesize that TD variability is closely linked with the strength of ocean circulation and bottom Ekman dynamics and use the MITgcm regional Amundsen-Bellingshausen Sea simulation40 (Methods), which successfully simulates TD variability in good agreement with observations, to investigate its main drivers.
Results
Thermocline depth variability governing melt rates
We investigated the ocean circulation and TD variability in the PIB using the model simulation from 1992 to 2020. The pattern of the full depth-averaged ocean currents (Fig. 1a) revealed an inflow from the north entering the PIB through the eastern side of the Pine Island Trough and flowing out of the PIB from the western side, forming a cyclonic circulation. The ocean circulation transports warm mCDW (about 0.5 °C or warmer located below 400–600 m depth) into the cavities of the PIIS/TIS and towards the grounding lines (Fig. 1c, d). A depth-time plot of the temperature in the PIB reveals that the TD, which defines 0.5 °C isotherm depth separating upper Winter Water and lower mCDW, has multi-timescale variability (Fig. 1b). The thickness and temperature of the lower warm water layer, which plays a crucial role in ice shelf melting, exhibits interannual to decadal variability, with a maximum vertical displacement of ~300 m from 1992 to 2020. This corresponds to isotherm fluctuations with similar amplitude observed over 5 years in a previous observational study24.
Our results demonstrate a strong correlation between the TD in the PIB and basal melt rates of PIIS/TIS (Supplementary Fig. 1), exhibiting year-to-year variation (red and blue lines in Fig. 2a). Low-melt years, such as 2004 and 2014, showed a deeper TD compared to other years, while the TD is shallower in high-melt years, such as 1993 and 2012 (Fig. 2a). Notably, the TD is strongly correlated with the volume transport of mCDW inflow into the PIB; as the mCDW inflow increases, the thermocline lifts, resulting in higher melt rates, and vice versa in years of lower melt rates. We calculated composites of high- and low-melt years (“Methods” section) and found that during high-melt years, the thermocline was uplifted and positioned close to the bottom of the ice shelf (Fig. 1c, d). This displacement means that more heat is delivered into the sub-ice shelf cavities, which can increase the basal melt rates. Our findings are consistent with previous observational and modelling studies16,23,38,41, particularly observations from an underwater vehicle42, which highlight the significant impact of the vertical displacement of the TD on changes in PIIS/TIS basal melt rates.
Ocean circulation controlling thermocline depth
Empirical Orthogonal Function (EOF) analysis was conducted to identify the primary mode of ocean circulation (Methods). The results of the leading EOF mode indicated that the current flowed onshore along the eastern side of the Pine Island Trough, approaching the ice shelves, and then flowed offshore through the western side (Fig. 3a). The temporal variability of this structure was captured using a Principal Component (PC) timeseries, as depicted in Fig. 3b, indicating that high and low PC values correspond to stronger and weaker cyclonic ocean circulation in the EOF spatial patterns, respectively.
Our analysis revealed a significant relationship between ocean circulation and TD changes, with a confidence level of 95% (Fig. 2b, black and red lines). For example, when the cyclonic ocean circulation weakened in 2004 and 2014, the thermocline deepened, whereas in 1993 and 2010, and 2020, when the cyclonic ocean circulation was stronger, the TD was lifted. This suggests that cyclonic ocean circulation in the PIB connected to the eastern Amundsen Sea is a primary cause of the TD displacement in the PIB. Moreover, we note that this ocean circulation coincides with the southward transport of the coastal current in the PIB, a larger-scale ocean current system (Fig. 2b, black and grey dotted lines), providing further evidence that the southward-flowing current in the eastern Amundsen Sea is closely connected to on-shelf circulation including the Antarctic Coastal Current (AACC)43.
To explain how ocean circulation modulates TD displacement, we suggest that the horizontal convergence at the bottom Ekman layer is responsible for the upwelling of warm mCDW into the ocean interior, which, in turn, affects the displacement of the TD. This hypothesis is supported by the result that time-integrated vertical velocity fluctuates similarly to the TD (Fig. 2c). This analysis suggests that stronger cyclonic ocean circulation may enhance mCDW convergence, as indicated by the larger negative relative vorticity (Methods) (Fig. 2c). This relationship is further supported by the composite maps (Fig. 1e, f), which demonstrate that the upward velocity is particularly strong at greater depths in high-melt years than in low-melt years. We revisited our analysis by using monthly data to investigate the seasonal variability and compared this with the identified interannual variability (Supplementary Fig. 2a, b). We found that the pronounced seasonal variability in ocean currents does not manifest similarly in the TD because response of the TD is moderated by the slower and cumulative changes in vertical velocity in the bottom layer, which filters out short-term fluctuations, such as those that occur during seasonal periods (Supplementary Fig. 2c).
We performed an analysis of the depth-integrated vorticity budget that takes into account the time tendency of vorticity, relative vorticity advection, along with the surface and bottom vortex stretching terms (Methods) (Supplementary Fig. 3). The most prominent factors were the advection of relative vorticity and the bottom vortex stretching term. We noted that the tendency of vorticity is negligibly small, which can become important in shorter timescales, e.g., super-inertial scales such as daily or shorter, but not over monthly or longer timescales relevant to this study. The residual term, which includes effects of mixing and computational errors, contributes to a minor 3% of the relative vorticity advection. Notably, the bottom vortex stretching term primarily acts in response to the advection of relative vorticity. Overall, our results suggest that enhanced vertical velocity due to the strengthened on-shelf circulation along bathymetric troughs in the PIB contributes to thermocline lifting through the amplification of cyclonic oceanic conditions.
We investigated the influence of surface Ekman pumping, generated by instantaneous ocean surface stress curl, on the TD variability using a similar approach to previous studies26,38. The surface Ekman pumping does not exhibit coherent variations with the TD variability; occasionally, it presents an opposing phase to the TD variability (Supplementary Fig. 4). Additionally, the magnitude of the TD variability estimated from the time-integrated surface Ekman pumping (Fig. 2d) is ~70% smaller than that estimated from time-integrated near-bottom vertical velocity (Fig. 2c). This underlines the minor role of surface Ekman pumping in influencing TD variability, which is consistent with results of previous studies33,37. These studies have shown that surface Ekman pumping is unlikely to be the main driver of influencing the variability in CDW layer thickness in the eastern Amundsen Sea on interannual or decadal timescale. A number of prior studies have investigated the influence of buoyancy forcing on the melting of ice shelves. Several studies have proposed that sea ice formation and cooling due to local air-sea heat exchange within the polynyas in the PIB can drive seasonal fluctuations in the TD24,39. Meanwhile, it is suggested that the local surface buoyancy forcing is unlikely to drive the variability of the ice shelf melting in the eastern Amundsen Sea on a decadal timescale37. While we mainly examined the variability on interannual to decadal timescales, we cannot rule out that surface buoyancy forcing could also affect variability shorter than those timescales.
Roles of ocean surface stress on ocean circulation
We investigated the contribution of Ocean Surface Stress (OSS) to the variability in ocean circulation. The OSS was computed from wind forcing and modified in the ocean model by the motion and concentration of sea ice. Prior studies21,36,37 have hypothesised that westerly winds off the continental shelf break favour onshore mCDW intrusion, thereby promoting more melting conditions on the PIB. Conversely, in our study, local and remote wind forcings over the continental shelf are proposed to be linked with increased ice shelf melting (Fig. 4a, d).
Locally in the eastern Amundsen Sea, our investigation on the OSS found a moderate correlation between the northward OSS and the enhanced cyclonic ocean circulation at a 90% confidence interval (Methods) (Fig. 4d, f). Remotely, we found that the easterly winds in the Bellingshausen Sea and West Antarctic Peninsula continental shelves are moderately correlated with on-shelf circulation in the eastern Amundsen Sea at a 90% confidence level (Fig. 4a), indicating that remote easterly winds can enhance the AACC, thus strengthening ocean circulation downstream in the PIB. This is consistent with previous studies showing that the prevailing easterly winds were examined as a driving force for AACC variability, along with buoyancy forces from meltwater and runoff in the Bellingshausen Sea and the West Antarctic Peninsula continental shelves44,45,46,47,48. Although a time lag may exist on a monthly scale, our analysis with 13-month moving averages suggests that the response is near instantaneous and we did not reveal any time lag between the winds in the Bellingshausen Sea and the ocean circulation in the eastern Amundsen Sea (Supplementary Fig. 5).
We investigated the evolution of the AACC between the Bellingshausen and Amundsen Seas and identified a strong and consistent connection between the on-shelf circulation in the eastern Amundsen Sea and various locations along the path of the AACC (Supplementary Fig. 6). This finding confirms that the AACC influences the ocean circulation in the eastern Amundsen Sea downstream instantaneously, mainly through its westward transport pathway46,47. The West Antarctic continental shelf is characterized by strong circumpolar winds that encircle the continent. These winds can generate coastal-trapped Kelvin waves that rapidly transmit barotropic current anomalies westward along the Antarctic coast within hours to days49,50. This atmospheric connectivity can lead to simultaneous weather patterns across these regions, contributing to the near-zero lag in conditions.
To verify agreement with previous studies21,36,37 on the roles of zonal winds, we examined whether the westerly winds at the shelf break significantly affect ice shelf melting on the PIB. The response of ocean circulation to wind forcing can be immediate or with some time delay. To investigate immediate ocean response to winds, we computed a regression and correlation map (Fig. 4c) between the OSS and cyclonic ocean circulation (Methods). Our results indicate that westerly winds off the continental shelf break are not significantly related to the strength of the on-shelf cyclonic ocean circulation. The correlation coefficients between the zonal OSS averaged off the continental shelf break (box A in Fig. 4c) and the strength of the cyclonic ocean circulation resulted in only −0.22, indicating a statistically negligible correlation (Fig. 4e). We assessed the time-integrated ocean surface stress at the shelf break using an approach similar to that of previous studies21,36 and compared it with the ocean circulation on the shelf by PC timeseries (Supplementary Fig. 7a). The PC response, even after accounting for time-integration of the winds, does not coincide directly with the wind forcing; rather, the winds precede by 2 years the ocean circulation. To investigate decadal ocean response to winds, we further conducted our analysis using a 5-year moving average filter (Supplementary Fig. 7b), consistent with a prior study37. We found a generally negative correlation at a decadal timescale between the westerly winds and on-shelf ocean circulation, aligning with a previous study37 that linked an easterly wind anomaly to an eastward undercurrent that can promote the heat transport onto the shelf. Nonetheless, our model output is not long enough to evaluate the robustness of this mechanism.
Discussion
We propose that the variability in TD, and thus ice shelf melting, is controlled by the on-shelf circulation in the eastern Amundsen Sea and its pathway following the complex Antarctic coastline through bottom Ekman dynamics. The on-shelf circulation meanders along the coastline and forms a clockwise circulation near the PIIS/TIS, which induces upwelling. We advance our understanding of the role of winds, indicating that the southerly local winds in the PIB, along with the remote easterly winds over the continental shelf in the Bellingshausen Sea, are crucial factors in strengthening the circulation in the eastern Amundsen Sea. We did not find a significant relationship between westerly winds off the continental shelf break and ice shelf melt rates within the PIB on the interannual timescale, despite prior studies21,36 suggesting that zonal winds at the shelf break could influence ice shelf melting.
Given that the on-shelf circulation following submarine glacial troughs is a widespread feature of the entire Antarctic coast and that the coastline has similar meandering structures due to a long history of glacier erosion, we infer that the proposed mechanism could regulate TD in other regions around Antarctica. Our findings provide important insights into the driving mechanisms of basal melting of the two ice shelves in the eastern Amundsen Sea and have implications for predicting future sea-level rise. Further studies on the upstream influences of the AACC and the wind forcings in the Bellingshausen Sea can help to elucidate the mechanism for the melting of Antarctic ice shelves. Our study underscores the need for long-term monitoring and numerical modelling, particularly focusing on the ocean circulation close to rapidly melting ice shelves, to better predict future Antarctic ice loss in this critical region.
Methods
MITgcm model and validation
We use a regional Amundsen Sea (AS)-Bellingshausen Sea (BS) configuration of the Massachusetts Institute of Technology general circulation model (MITgcm), which includes dynamic/thermodynamic sea ice and thermodynamic ice shelf capabilities. We use the model output51 extended from 1992 to 2020, based on the AS-BS simulation from the study40. The model domain contains the AS and BS (black line in Fig. 1 inset) and has a nominal horizontal grid spacing of 1/12◦, equivalent to 2–3 km over the AS and BS continental shelf. The vertical discretisation comprises 70 levels varying in thickness from 10 m near the surface, to 70–90 m at depths of 500–1000 m, and 450 m at the deepest level of 6000 m. The model bathymetry is the International Bathymetric Chart of the Southern Ocean (IBCSO)52, and the model ice draft is Antarctic Bedrock Mapping (BEDMAP-2)53. The initial conditions are derived from a 16-year (2001–2016) spin-up, integrated from rest and from January World Ocean Atlas 2009 temperature54 and salinity55 fields. Surface and lateral forcing for the 1992–2017 period is provided by ECCO LLC27056, which is based on ERA-Interim57 and has been adjusted using the ECCO adjoint model-based methodology58.
This model and its further downscaled version have been used and evaluated for off-shelf and on-shelf hydrography and circulation in the Amundsen Sea and Bellingshausen Sea23,40,59,60,61. We compared model results with observations from a prior study (see Fig. 2c in Webber et al.24.), which obtained timeseries of ocean temperature in the vicinity of the ice front of the Pine Island Ice shelf on a monthly basis from 2009 to 2014. During the same period at the nearest model grid point to the observation site, we demonstrated that TD varies with a range of approximately 290 m for 5 years, from 620 m to 330 m, which is similar to the observational range of approximately 300 m for 5 years, but with maximum and minimum depths of 700 m and 400 m, respectively, indicating our model underestimated the TD during this period. While the observational data indicates that the thermocline deepens from 2011 reaches its maximum depth in early 2013, our model indicates the thermocline deepens from 2012 with the deepest TD in October 2013, with an acceptable time delay for our study, which focuses on a longer timeseries than seasonal variation. Despite the discrepancy between model and observation for the time-averaged TD, we believe that our model accurately represents TD variability.
Definition of high- and low-melt years
Based on one standard deviation of the simulated monthly melt rates of both Pine Island and Thwaites Ice Shelves, high-melting and low-melting cases were defined for composite analysis of TD and vertical velocity. High-melting cases were selected from 1992, 1993, 1994, 2008, 2011, 2012, and 2020, and low-melting cases were selected from 1997, 1999, 2003, 2004, 2013, 2014, and 2015.
Empirical Orthogonal Function analysis
EOF analyses are widely used to quantify the spatial and temporal variability of a variable of interest. In the present study, we investigated the leading modes of ocean circulation by combining meridional and zonal fields. Prior to EOF analysis, seasonal variability was eliminated using a 13-month moving average, and a geographic weighting factor was applied based on latitude. The use of a 13-month moving average filter serves to remove the effects of shorter-term fluctuations, such as those associated with seasonal variability. Consequently, the correlations identify relationships over interannual to decadal timescales. As a result of the EOF analysis, the leading mode was used to represent major ocean circulation and temporal variability, known as the Principal Component (PC) timeseries. The PC timeseries were normalised by their respective standard deviations. We abbreviate the leading mode of the PC timeseries as PC1.
Regression and correlation analysis
Regression and correlation analyses were used to determine the relationships between two variables. Linear regression coefficients between ocean surface stress (zonal and meridional components) and the EOF PC timeseries of ocean currents indicated changes in ocean surface stress per unit change in the PC timeseries of ocean currents. Arrows indicate the regression coefficients for the zonal and meridional stresses. Correlation coefficients were calculated to measure the strength of the linear relationship between ocean surface stress and the PC timeseries. Student’s t test was conducted with lag-one autocorrelation coefficients for the effective sample size to test the significance of the coefficient62.
Relative vorticity, surface Ekman pumping velocity, and vertical velocity at the bottom
Relative vorticity (\(\zeta\)) is defined as
where \({{{{{\bf{u}}}}}}\) is the horizontal velocity of the ocean current. The depth-averaged relative vorticity is used for Fig. 2c in the main text. The Ekman pumping velocity (\({w}_{{{{{{\rm{Ek}}}}}}}\)) derived from ocean surface stress is calculated as
where \({{{{{{\boldsymbol{\tau }}}}}}}_{{{{{{\bf{o}}}}}}}\) is horizontal ocean surface stress, \({\rho }_{{{{{{\rm{o}}}}}}}=1030\,{{{{{\rm{kg}}}}}}\,{{{{{{\rm{m}}}}}}}^{-3}\) is ocean density, and \({f}_{{{{{{\rm{o}}}}}}}=2\varOmega \sin \theta\) is the Coriolis parameter at the latitude \(\theta\) where the southern hemisphere has a negative sign, \(\varOmega=7.29\times {10}^{-5}{{{{{{\rm{s}}}}}}}^{-1}\) is the angular speed of rotation of the Earth. A positive (negative) value of \({w}_{{{{{{\rm{Ek}}}}}}}\) denotes upwelling (downwelling) motion.
The vertical velocity near the bottom (\({w}_{{{{{{\rm{B}}}}}}}\)) refers to the vertical velocity in the layer of the model grid closest to the bottom.
Vorticity budget analysis
We use the depth-integrated quasi-geostrophic vorticity balance equation63.
where \({{{{{\bf{u}}}}}}\) is the velocity of ocean current, \(\zeta\) is the relative vorticity defined by \(\zeta={{{{{\boldsymbol{\nabla }}}}}}\times {{{{{\bf{u}}}}}}\), \({f}_{{{{{{\rm{o}}}}}}}\) is the Coriolis parameter, \({w}_{{{{{{\rm{o}}}}}}}\) and \({w}_{-{{{{{\rm{H}}}}}}}\) correspond to the vertical velocity at the surface and the bottom grid of the model, respectively. The left-hand-side represents time tendency of vorticity and relative vorticity advection, while the right-hand-side represents the surface and bottom vortex stretching term.
Data availability
The model code, input, and results are available at https://zenodo.org/records/6570222 provided by Hyogo64. They are also available at https://ecco.jpl.nasa.gov/drive/files/ECCO2/LLC1080_REG_AMS/Hyogo_et_al_2022.
Code availability
The main codes used for generating results are accessible at https://zenodo.org/records/10812679.
References
Jacobs, S. S., Hellmer, H. H. & Jenkins, A. Antarctic Ice Sheet melting in the southeast Pacific. Geophys. Res. Lett. 23, 957–960 (1996).
Shepherd, A. et al. A reconciled estimate of ice-sheet mass balance. Science 338, 1183–1189 (2012).
Joughin, I., Smith, B. E. & Holland, D. M. Sensitivity of 21st century sea level to ocean‐induced thinning of Pine Island Glacier, Antarctica. Geophys. Res. Lett. 37, L20502 (2010).
Favier, L. et al. Retreat of Pine Island Glacier controlled by marine ice-sheet instability. Nat. Clim. Change 4, 117–121 (2014).
Shepherd, A. et al. Mass balance of the Antarctic Ice Sheet from 1992 to 2017. Nature 558, 219–222 (2018).
Rignot, E. et al. Four decades of Antarctic Ice Sheet mass balance from 1979–2017. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 116, 1095–1103 (2019).
Payne, A. J., Vieli, A., Shepherd, A. P., Wingham, D. J. & Rignot, E. Recent dramatic thinning of largest West Antarctic ice stream triggered by oceans. Geophys. Res. Lett. 31, L23401 (2004).
Joughin, I., Smith, B. E. & Medley, B. Marine ice sheet collapse potentially under way for the Thwaites Glacier basin, West Antarctica. Science 344, 735–738 (2014).
Seroussi, H. et al. Sensitivity of the dynamics of Pine Island Glacier, West Antarctica, to climate forcing for the next 50 years. Cryosphere 8, 1699–1710 (2014).
Mouginot, J., Rignot, E. & Scheuchl, B. Sustained increase in ice discharge from the Amundsen Sea Embayment, West Antarctica, from 1973 to 2013. Geophys. Res. Lett. 41, 1576–1584 (2014).
Bevan, S. L., Luckman, A. J., Benn, D. I., Adusumilli, S. & Crawford, A. Brief communication: Thwaites Glacier cavity evolution. Cryosphere 15, 3317–3328 (2021).
Alley, K. E. et al. Two decades of dynamic change and progressive destabilization on the Thwaites Eastern Ice Shelf. Cryosphere 15, 5187–5203 (2021).
Rignot, E., Mouginot, J., Morlighem, M., Seroussi, H. & Scheuchl, B. Widespread, rapid grounding line retreat of Pine Island, Thwaites, Smith, and Kohler glaciers, West Antarctica, from 1992 to 2011. Geophys. Res. Lett. 41, 3502–3509 (2014).
McConnochie, C. High variability reveals complexity under Thwaites Glacier. Nature 614, 420–422 (2023).
Thoma, M., Jenkins, A., Holland, D. & Jacobs, S. Modelling Circumpolar Deep Water intrusions on the Amundsen Sea continental shelf, Antarctica. Geophys. Res. Lett. 35, L18602 (2008).
Jacobs, S. S., Jenkins, A., Giulivi, C. F. & Dutrieux, P. Stronger ocean circulation and increased melting under Pine Island Glacier ice shelf. Nat. Geosci. 4, 519–523 (2011).
Wåhlin, A. K. et al. Some implications of Ekman layer dynamics for cross-shelf exchange in the Amundsen Sea. J. Phys. Oceanogr. 42, 1461–1474 (2012).
St-Laurent, P., Klinck, J. M. & Dinniman, M. S. On the Role of Coastal Troughs in the Circulation of Warm Circumpolar Deep Water on Antarctic Shelves. J. Phys. Oceanogr. 43, 51–64 (2013).
Assmann, K. M. et al. Variability of Circumpolar Deep Water transport onto the Amundsen Sea continental shelf through a shelf break trough. J. Geophys. Res. Oceans 118, 6603–6620 (2013).
Walker, D. P., Jenkins, A., Assmann, K. M., Shoosmith, D. R. & Brandon, M. A. Oceanographic observations at the shelf break of the Amundsen Sea, Antarctica. J. Geophys. Res. Oceans 118, 2906–2918 (2013).
Dutrieux, P. et al. Strong sensitivity of Pine Island ice-shelf melting to climatic variability. Science 343, 174–178 (2014).
Jenkins, A. et al. West Antarctic Ice Sheet retreat in the Amundsen Sea driven by decadal oceanic variability. Nat. Geosci. 11, 733–738 (2018).
Nakayama, Y. et al. Pathways of ocean heat towards Pine Island and Thwaites grounding lines. Sci. Rep. 9, 16649 (2019).
Webber, B. G. M. et al. Mechanisms driving variability in the ocean forcing of Pine Island Glacier. Nat. Commun. 8, 14507 (2017).
Kimura, S. et al. Oceanographic controls on the variability of ice‐shelf basal melting and circulation of glacial meltwater in the Amundsen Sea embayment, Antarctica. J. Geophys. Res. Oceans 122, 10131–10155 (2017).
Dotto, T. S. et al. Wind-Driven Processes Controlling Oceanic Heat Delivery to the Amundsen Sea, Antarctica. J. Phys. Oceanogr. 49, 2829–2849 (2019).
De Rydt, J., Holland, P. R., Dutrieux, P. & Jenkins, A. Geometric and oceanographic controls on melting beneath Pine Island Glacier. J. Geophys. Res. Oceans 119, 2420–2438 (2014).
Schodlok, M. P., Menemenlis, D., Rignot, E. & Studinger, M. Sensitivity of the ice-shelf/ocean system to the sub-ice-shelf cavity shape measured by NASA IceBridge in Pine Island Glacier, West Antarctica. Ann. Glaciol. 53, 156–162 (2012).
Yoon, S. T. et al. Ice front retreat reconfigures meltwater-driven gyres modulating ocean heat delivery to an Antarctic ice shelf. Nat. Commun. 13, 306 (2022).
Azaneu, M. et al. Influence of Shelf Break Processes on the Transport of Warm Waters Onto the Eastern Amundsen Sea Continental Shelf. J. Geophys. Res. Oceans 128, e2022JC019535 (2023).
Christie, F. D. W., Steig, E. J., Gourmelen, N., Tett, S. F. B. & Bingham, R. G. Inter-decadal climate variability induces differential ice response along Pacific-facing West Antarctica. Nat. Commun. 14, 93 (2023).
Steig, E. J., Ding, Q., Battisti, D. S. & Jenkins, A. Tropical forcing of Circumpolar Deep Water Inflow and outlet glacier thinning in the Amundsen Sea Embayment, West Antarctica. Ann. Glaciol. 53, 19–28 (2012).
Holland, P. R., Bracegirdle, T. J., Dutrieux, P., Jenkins, A. & Steig, E. J. West Antarctic ice loss influenced by internal climate variability and anthropogenic forcing. Nat. Geosci. 12, 718–724 (2019).
Naughten, K. A. et al. Simulated twentieth‐century ocean warming in the Amundsen Sea, West Antarctica. Geophys. Res. Lett. 49, e2021GL094566 (2022).
Paolo, F. S. et al. Response of Pacific-sector Antarctic ice shelves to the El Niño/Southern Oscillation. Nat. Geosci. 11, 121–126 (2018).
Jenkins, A. et al. Decadal Ocean Forcing and Antarctic Ice Sheet Response: Lessons from the Amundsen Sea. Oceanography 29, 106–117 (2016).
Silvano, A. et al. Baroclinic Ocean Response to Climate Forcing Regulates Decadal Variability of Ice-Shelf Melting in the Amundsen Sea. Geophys. Res. Lett. 49, e2022GL100646 (2022).
Webber, B. G. M., Heywood, K. J., Stevens, D. P. & Assmann, K. M. The impact of overturning and horizontal circulation in Pine Island Trough on ice shelf melt in the eastern Amundsen Sea. J. Phys. Oceanogr. 49, 63–83 (2019).
St‐Laurent, P., Klinck, J. M. & Dinniman, M. S. Impact of local winter cooling on the melt of Pine Island Glacier, Antarctica. J. Geophys. Res. Oceans 120, 6718–6732 (2015).
Nakayama, Y., Menemenlis, D., Zhang, H., Schodlok, M. & Rignot, E. Origin of Circumpolar Deep Water intruding onto the Amundsen and Bellingshausen Sea continental shelves. Nat. Commun. 9, 3403 (2018).
Jenkins, A. et al. Observations beneath Pine Island Glacier in West Antarctica and implications for its retreat. Nat. Geosci. 3, 468–472 (2010).
Schmidt, B. E. et al. Heterogeneous melting near the Thwaites Glacier grounding line. Nature 614, 471–478 (2023).
Drijfhout, S. S. et al. An Amundsen Sea source of decadal temperature changes on the Antarctic continental shelf. Ocean Dyn. 74, 37–52 (2024).
Moffat, C., Beardsley, R. C., Owens, B. & van Lipzig, N. A first description of the Antarctic Peninsula Coastal Current. Deep Sea Res. Part II 55, 277–293 (2008).
Holland, P. R., Jenkins, A. & Holland, D. M. Ice and ocean processes in the Bellingshausen Sea, Antarctica. J. Geophys. Res. Oceans 115, C05020 (2010).
Nakayama, Y., Timmermann, R. & Hellmer, H. Impact of West Antarctic ice shelf melting on Southern Ocean hydrography. Cryosphere 14, 2205–2216 (2020).
Schubert, R., Thompson, A. F., Speer, K., Schulze Chretien, L. & Bebieva, Y. The Antarctic Coastal Current in the Bellingshausen Sea. Cryosphere 15, 4179–4199 (2021).
Flexas, M. M., Thompson, A. F., Schodlok, M. P., Zhang, H. & Speer, K. Antarctic Peninsula warming triggers enhanced basal melt rates throughout West Antarctica. Sci. Adv. 8, eabj9134 (2022).
Spence, P. et al. Localized rapid warming of West Antarctic subsurface waters by remote winds. Nat. Clim. Change 7, 595–603 (2017).
Kusahara, K. & Ohshima, K. Kelvin Waves around Antarctica. J. Phys. Oceanogr. 44, 2909–2920 (2014).
Hyogo, S., Nakayama, Y. & Mensah, V. Modeling ocean circulation and ice shelf melt in the Bellingshausen Sea. J. Geophys. Res. Oceans 129, e2022JC019275 (2024).
Arndt, J. E. et al. The international bathymetric chart of the Southern Ocean (IBCSO) version 1.0–A new bathymetric compilation covering circum-Antarctic waters. Geophys. Res. Lett. 40, 3111–3117 (2013).
Fretwell, P. et al. Bedmap2: Improved ice bed, surface and thickness datasets for Antarctica. Cryosphere 7, 375–393 (2013).
Locarnini, R. A. et al. World Ocean Atlas 2009 Volume 1: Temperature (U.S. Gov. Printing Office, Washington, D.C., 2010).
Antonov, J. I. et al. World Ocean Atlas 2009 Volume 2: Salinity (U.S. Gov. Printing Office, Washington, D.C., 2010).
Zhang, H., Menemenlis, D. & Fenty, I. ECCO LLC270 Ocean-Ice State Estimate (California Institute of Technology, 2018).
Dee, D. P. et al. The ERA‐Interim reanalysis: configuration and performance of the data assimilation system. Q. J. R. Meteorol. Soc. 137, 553–597 (2011).
Wunsch, C. & Heimbach P. Ocean Circulation and Climate: A 21st Century Perspective (eds. Siedler, G., Griffies, S. M., Gould, J. & Church J. A.) 553–579 (Academic Press, 2013).
Nakayama, Y., Cai, C. & Seroussi, H. Impact of subglacial freshwater discharge on Pine Island ice shelf. Geophys. Res. Lett. 48, e2021GL093923 (2021).
Dotto, T. S. et al. Ocean variability beneath Thwaites Eastern Ice Shelf driven by the Pine Island Bay Gyre strength. Nat. Commun. 13, 7840 (2022).
Dundas, V. et al. Hydrography, circulation, and response to atmospheric forcing in the vicinity of the central Getz Ice Shelf, Amundsen Sea, Antarctica. Ocean Sci. 18, 1339–1359 (2022).
Zwiers, W. F. & Von Storch, H. Taking serial correlation into account in tests of the mean. J. Clim. 8, 336–351 (1995).
Firing, Y. L., Chereskin, T. K., Watts, D. R. & Mazloff, M. R. Bottom pressure torque and the vorticity balance from observations in Drake Passage. J. Geophys. Res. Oceans 121, 4282–4302 (2016).
Hyogo, S. MITgcm model setup and output for “Modeling ocean circulation in the Bellingshausen Sea”. Zenodo https://zenodo.org/records/6570222 (2022).
Acknowledgements
This study was supported by the Korea Institute of Marine Science & Technology Promotion (KIMST) under the funding provided by the Korean Ministry of Oceans and Fisheries (Grant No. RS-2023-00256677; PM24020) for T.P. and S.N. Additional support for T.P. was provided by the Korea Polar Research Institute (Grant No. PE24110). The Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research (Grant No. 21K13989) from the Japanese Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science, and Technology and the Inoue Science Research Award from the Inoue Science Foundation supported N.Y.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
T.P. and N.Y. designed the study and conducted the model data analysis. T.P., N.Y. and S.N. contributed to the interpretation of the results, development of the idea, and writing of the manuscript.
Corresponding authors
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Peer review
Peer review information
Nature Communications thanks Benjamin Webber and the other, anonymous, reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work. A peer review file is available.
Additional information
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary information
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Park, T., Nakayama, Y. & Nam, S. Amundsen Sea circulation controls bottom upwelling and Antarctic Pine Island and Thwaites ice shelf melting. Nat Commun 15, 2946 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-024-47084-z
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-024-47084-z
Comments
By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.