Abstract
A long-standing challenge in bioinspired materials is to design and synthesize synthetic materials that mimic the sophisticated structures and functions of natural biomaterials, such as helical protein assemblies that are important in biological systems. Herein, we report the formation of a series of nanohelices from a type of well-developed protein-mimetics called peptoids. We demonstrate that nanohelix structures and supramolecular chirality can be well-controlled through the side-chain chemistry. Specifically, the ionic effects on peptoids from varying the polar side-chain groups result in the formation of either single helical fiber or hierarchically stacked helical bundles. We also demonstrate that the supramolecular chirality of assembled peptoid helices can be controlled by modifying assembling peptoids with a single chiral amino acid side chain. Computational simulations and theoretical modeling predict that minimizing exposure of hydrophobic domains within a twisted helical form presents the most thermodynamically favorable packing of these amphiphilic peptoids and suggests a key role for both polar and hydrophobic domains on nanohelix formation. Our findings establish a platform to design and synthesize chiral functional materials using sequence-defined synthetic polymers.
Similar content being viewed by others
Introduction
Chirality is essential in defining the structures and biological processes across length scales. On the macroscale, nautiluses develop spiral shells through biomineralization1,2. Collagens that makeup 25% to 35% of the whole human body protein consist of nanoscale helical peptide chains known as triple helices3,4. On the molecular scale, the stereoselectivity of biochemical reactions requires small molecules with specific chirality to proceed and take effect5,6,7,8. Indeed, such high-level helical structures are often defined by the molecular chirality of their building blocks. Several chiral building blocks, including peptide amphiphiles, C3 symmetric molecules, and π-conjugated molecules, have been reported to assemble into helical structures with supramolecular chirality9,10,11,12,13,14. These examples highlight the importance of understanding how molecular interactions translate the chirality to the geometry of nanostructures by controlling the packing of their structural units9,13,14.
In the last decades, tremendous efforts have been invested in designing and understanding helical structures assembled from peptides and proteins due to their biological relevance and various potential applications10. Among those efforts in developing bottom-up approaches for synthesizing helical nanostructures, it is important to have deliberate control over intermolecular interactions1,13,15,16,17,18,19,20. While many peptides and proteins have been used as sequence-defined building blocks for the assembly of helical nanostructures, precise control over their intermolecular interactions remains challenging. In these peptide and protein systems, complex intramolecular and intermolecular interactions lead to rich assembly behaviors and present challenges for rational understanding and prediction of assembly pathways and outcomes11,21.
Peptoids, or N-substituted glycines which have been developed as a type of peptidomimetics with reduced backbone interactions22, are sequence-defined polymers structurally similar to peptides, but the side-chain groups reside on the nitrogen instead of the α-carbon. These molecules retain the sequence-programmability and side-chain diversity inherited from peptides but lack backbone hydrogen bond donors and chirality22,23. Peptoid-peptoid and peptoid-surface interactions can be tuned by controlling the side-chain chemistry22,23. Recently, we and others discovered a series of amphiphilic peptoids that can assemble into diverse nanostructures11,22,23,24,25,26, including membrane-mimetic nanosheets27,28 and nanotubes8,29 which share a similar molecular packing of amphiphilic peptoids akin to the lipid bilayer but are highly crystalline and robust. Despite the recent progress made in the design and synthesis of peptoid-based functional nanomaterials with various nanostructures11,22,23,30, chiral nanostructures have been rarely reported31. While recent computational studies suggest that the formation of membrane-mimetic nanosheets might involve the formation of helical nanostructures as intermediates32, it remains unclear how a highly ordered, bilayer-like packing of achiral amphiphilic peptoids could be twisted into chiral helices and how to experimentally control the twist and handedness of such assemblies. Murnen et al. reported the assembly of a long achiral amphiphilic peptoid, Npe15Nce15, into homochiral superhelices in 201031, but the exact mechanism of these superhelices formation remains unclear due to the experimental challenges in resolving transient intermediates and computational challenges in simulating large biomolecular systems. Thus, further studies to expose molecular understanding of the driving forces for helical structure formation from short achiral peptoids can help advance the predictive synthesis of chiral functional nanomaterials and guide the engineering of peptidomimetic chiral materials with desirable properties for applications including sensing, catalysis, electronics, and photonics.
Herein, we report the design, synthesis, and characterizations of a series of helical nanostructures assembled from short peptoid sequences. By having a short tetrameric hydrophobic side-chain domain and a single polar group to construct the lipid-like amphiphilic peptoids, our results show that the twisted helical structure presents a thermodynamically stable packing of these peptoids in the aqueous environment for their assembly into hierarchical materials. We further find that a slight change of the assembly solution pH condition, or the chemistry of polar group can significantly impact the peptoid assembly outcome, which enables a precise control over the nanohelix handedness by varying the chirality of single polar group. Molecular dynamics (MD) simulations are performed to predict and resolve helical structure formation in atomistic resolution, showing the twisted bilayer-like packing of these amphiphilic peptoids into helical structures shields the hydrophobic side chains from the aqueous solvent, and suggest that a balance of the hydrophobic and hydrophilic interactions is the key for the assembly of these peptoids into helical structures. A simple phenomenological model for the ribbon geometry provides a molecular rationalization for the observed increase in ribbon width upon moving from neutral to acidic pH as a relative change in the balance of peptoid-solvent hydrophobic interfacial interactions and peptoid-peptoid dispersion interactions.
Results
Design of short amphiphilic peptoids
Similar to previously reported lipid-like amphiphilic peptoids that self-assemble into membrane-mimetic nanosheets and nanotubes29,33, we study diblock-like peptoids possessing only four hydrophobic Npm (Npm = N-phenylmethyl glycine) side chains with one polar group, such as a diglycolic acid (Dig) or an alanine (Ala) group, at the N-terminus (Fig. 1a). Due to the decreased number (n) of hydrophobic Npm side chains (from a typical n = 6 to 4), we hypothesized, in contrast to our previously reported sheet- and tube-forming sequences23,29,33, these short peptoids would give us more flexibility to control the self-assembly outcomes for the synthesis of helical nanostructures by varying the chemistry of polar groups and the assembly solution pH conditions (Fig. 1b). All peptoids were synthesized following a previously reported submonomer synthesis method33,34. The detailed synthesis and characterizations of these peptoids are shown in the Supporting Information (Supplementary Figs. 1–6).
Assembly and characterizations of peptoid nanohelices
For the assembly of peptoids into helical nanostructures (Fig. 1b), specific lyophilized peptoids, such as Npm4Dig, were well-dissolved in water and acetonitrile (v/v = 1:1) to obtain a clear solution (5.0 mM). The obtained clear solution was left undisturbed at 4 °C for an easy and slow evaporation to trigger the self-assembly and crystallization process (see Supplementary Information for details). To gain insight into the structure of the peptoid assemblies, we performed computer simulations (See Supplementary Information, Supplementary Fig. 7) and examined the self-assembled materials using transmission electron microscopy (TEM) and atomic force microscopy (AFM). Negatively stained TEM and annular dark-field scanning TEM (ADF-STEM) (Fig. 1c and Supplementary Fig. 8) revealed the presence of nanohelices with a width of 10.7 ± 1.4 nm and nearly microns in length. From these TEM images (Fig. 1c and Supplementary Fig. 8), we determined that peptoid nanohelices adopt both a left-handed direction and a right-handed direction with equal populations of each. AFM images (Fig. 1d, e, and Supplementary Fig. 9) further confirmed the formation of peptoid nanohelices, showing a helix thickness of 5.2 ± 0.4 nm. Both TEM and AFM results show that these peptoid helices extend in length over several micrometers. The observation of many overlapping helices (Supplementary Figs. 8 and 9) indicated that they were free-standing in solution and overlapped during sample preparation.
To probe for more structural information of the nanohelix, we performed synchrotron-based X-ray diffraction (XRD) and 13C solid-state nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy (ss-NMR) measurements. XRD results show that these peptoid helices are crystalline (Fig. 1e). The first low q peak corresponds to the thickness of bilayer-like packing of Npm4Dig with a spacing of 2.46 nm. Such bilayer-like packing of amphiphilic peptoids is similar to those we previously observed in peptoid nanosheets33,35 and nanotubes29 but with much-decreased thickness due to the change of hydrophobic side-chain number (n). The peak at q = 1.36 Å−1 shows the spacing of 4.6 Å which corresponds to the ordered alignment of peptoid backbone chains, and the 1.36 nm spacing shows the distance between two peptoid backbones packed inside the peptoid bilayer with Npm groups facing each other. The spacing of 2.9 Å could be the distance between two adjacent residues along the backbone chain direction of a cis-conformation peptoid36,37. To further address how hydrophobic interactions influence the peptoid assembly morphology, we varied the numbers of Npm groups from four to six and two. AFM results showed that the peptoid Npm6Dig with six Npm groups self-assembled into nanosheets (Supplementary Fig. 10a) due to enhanced hydrophobic interactions. In contrast, peptoid Npm2Dig with only two Npm groups self-assembled into isolated particles (Supplementary Fig. 10b) due to reduced hydrophobic interactions. Such enhanced hydrophobic interactions among Npm6 domains were also revealed in the XRD data of nanosheets assembled from Npm6Nce6 (Supplementary Fig. 11) in which two sharp peaks between d spacings of 2.9 Å and 4.6 Å were observed. Interestingly, similar nanohelices were observed when the assembly of Npm4Dig were performed at different ratios of CH3CN and H2O (Supplementary Fig. 12). In contrast to the XRD results of nanosheets assembled from peptoids with six Npm6 groups which have two significant peaks at 4.0 and 3.6 Å (Supplementary Fig. 11), no obvious peaks were observed in this area for self-assembled Npm4Dig nanohelices. Because our previous studies29,33,37 showed that the peaks occurred in this area are corresponding to the presence of extensive π-stacking among aromatic side-chain groups38,39, the XRD results suggest that there are no π-stacking interactions among Npm side chains within Npm4Dig nanohelices, which could be due to the less crystallinity feature of these hydrophobic domains within nanohelices compared to those within crystalline nanosheets. Solid-state-NMR results further confirmed that peptoids assembled into ordered structures after nanohelix formation. Specifically, in contrast to the Npm4Dig peptoid samples before the evaporation-induced assembly process, the self-assembled peptoid nanohelix samples demonstrate 13C NMR signals with sharper linewidth, indicating assembly into highly ordered structures in aqueous solution40 (Fig. 1g).
Based on the above TEM, AFM, and XRD results, we arrived a working model for the structure of bilayer-packing of Npm4Dig to form nanohelices (Fig. 1b). While the model of bi-layer packed Npm4Dig is similar to our previously reported models of bi-layer packed lipid-like peptoids that form sheets and tubes29,33,35, The thickness of this bi-layer peptoid structure (Fig. 1b) is decreased to 2.46 nm due to the reduced number of hydrophobic side chains and the length of peptoids. Furthermore, the twist of Npm side chains could be the reason for the almost no presence of π-stacking observed among these aromatic side chains (Fig. 1f). In contrast to the previously reported superhelices with a diameter of 624 ± 69 nm and the use of peptoid with 30 side chains31, these nanohelices self-assembled from Npm4Dig offer a system to understand the origin of the helical structure formation due to the much-reduced complexity.
Molecular dynamic simulation of peptoid nanohelices
To further explore this peptoid helix packing model and to better understand the formation of helical structures, we conducted MD simulations to investigate the development of peptoid nanohelices. The simulation started with a flat, non-helical ribbon with two layers of lipid-like amphiphilic packing in water (Fig. 2a and Supplementary Data 1). The molecular distances within the model are the same as the bi-layer packing of Npm4Dig shown in Fig. 1b, based on the corresponding peaks observed in the XRD spectrum. Initially, simulations were conducted using Npm4Dig peptoids with the Npm4Dig carboxylate group in the deprotonated -COO− form. The pre-assembled Npm4Dig ribbon with -COO− groups quickly disintegrate in the simulation, likely due to the electrostatic repulsion. As a result, remaining simulations were conducted with fully protonated -COOH groups. A discussion of pH-dependent assembly is provided below, and full details of the simulation protocol is provided in the Supplementary Information. Our simulations show that the initial flat peptoid ribbons spontaneously adopt a twisted configuration in just 20 ns (Fig. 2b and Supplementary Data 2). Analysis of the twist angle over the course of the simulations reveals the ribbon to adopt a global twist angle of approximately 98°, corresponding to a predicted pitch per full helical turn of 87 nm (Fig. 2c). The spontaneous adoption of a twist suggests that the twisted helical structure is more stable than the flat, non-helical structure and presents a more favorable packing of the Npm4Dig peptoids. Following a previous study on twisted peptide ribbons41, in which the self-assembly is often governed by a combination of hydrophobic interactions and the propensity of the peptide to form a β-sheet-type hydrogen bonding arrangement, we propose that twisting of the Npm4Dig helices results from shielding the hydrophobic blocks of the peptoids from solvent while maintaining hydrophobic interactions between Npm side chains. As described below, this phenomenological model also explains the observed increase in ribbon width with lowering pH. The simulations predict that the twisted helical structure distributes the hydrophilic Dig groups around the twisted nanoribbons as shown in Fig. 2b. The four independent MD simulations all formed a right-handed helix since they all started from the same initial conditions. However, since Npm4Dig peptoids and water solvent are both achiral, one would expect the right- and left-handed helices to be equally favorable. Indeed, experimentally we observe the formation of left-handed and right-handed helices with equal probability (Supplementary Figs. 8 and 13).
MD simulations suggest that – similar to the formation of peptoid nanosheets and nanotubes22,29,33,35,42,43,44,45 – formation of the Npm4Dig helices is governed by the interplay of the hydrophilic and hydrophobic domains with the aqueous solvent. Thus, we reasoned that a slight change in the hydrophilic domain while keeping the hydrophobic Npm4 domain unchanged could dramatically influence the driving force that leads to the formation of peptoid helices. To test that, we were motivated to vary the assembly solution pH conditions and the chemistry of polar group and demonstrated the experimental synthesis of peptoid nanohelices with controllable thicknesses and chirality.
We first performed the assembly of Npm4Dig in different solution pH because our previous studies showed that the protonation states of carboxylic acid groups could influence the electrostatic interactions and thus impact the packing of the hydrophobic groups during peptoid assembly46. At pH = 7, where the carboxylic acid group of Dig is supposed to be deprotonated in the -COO− form, it resulted in increased electrostatic repulsion that drives the formation of individual narrow helices (Fig. 3a). When the solution pH was changed from 7 to 4, the hydrophilic Dig group became partially protonated with a reduced electrostatic repulsion, which makes this hydrophilic group less efficient to cover the hydrophobic domains of Npm4, thus resulting in the formation of nanohelices with multi-layered stacking of twisted ribbons with a much larger widths and heights (Fig. 3b). The quantitative analysis for the heights of multiple helices shows a significant increase of helix height from 5.2 ± 0.4 nm to 15.6 ± 2.4 nm (Fig. 3d, e) with a 1:1 ratio of left- and right-handedness helices (Supplementary Figs. 13, 14). Interestingly, the experimentally observed helical pitch of 86.4 ± 6.7 nm reported at pH = 7 in Fig. 3c is in excellent agreement with the pitch of 87 nm predicted in our MD simulations with all protonated -COOH group. The Npm4Dig carboxylate group exists in a dynamic equilibrium between -COO− and -COOH forms. In lower pH conditions, the equilibrium shifts towards the -COOH form resulting in increased hydrophobicity, and we observe wider nanohelices. In higher pH conditions, the equilibrium shifts towards the -COO− form resulting in increased hydrophilicity that results in narrower nanohelices and, at sufficiently high pH, no ordered self-assembled nanostructures at very high pH conditions. To prove this point, we repeated self-assembly experiments at a high pH condition (pH = 12), which gives amorphous aggregates instead of any ordered self-assembled nanostructures, most likely due to the highly charged polar groups that are sufficient to hide hydrophobic Npm groups in a particle-like aggregation state as a result of the increased electrostatic repulsion (Supplementary Fig. 15). The observation of amorphous aggregates at pH = 12 is in agreement with our MD simulations of peptoids in the -COO− form for which we observed rapid disintegration of a pre-assembled ribbon. A deficiency of our MD simulations is that we model the Npm4Dig carboxylate group in either the -COO− or -COOH form, and so do not directly probe the pH-dependent dynamic equilibrium due to the relatively high computational cost of constant-pH simulations47. Taken together, our experimental observations and computational predictions suggest that the greater propensity for aggregation at low pH is due to increased protonation of the Npm4Dig carboxylate group into the -COOH form leading to reduced intermolecular electrostatic repulsion. Conversely, at high pH the deprotonated -COO− form suppresses aggregation into ribbons and instead results in amorphous aggregation. Because the pKa of carboxylic acid group is ~3.548, and our results suggest that partial protonation of carboxylate group into the -COOH form occurs at as high as pH 7, we reasoned that the dissociation equilibrium may be substantially modulated due to intramolecular effects within supramolecular stack and exclusion of water solvent within the peptoid helix assemblies.
To gain molecular insight into the observed trend of increasing ribbon width with lowering solution pH, we developed a simple phenomenological thermodynamic model for the geometry of the self-assembled twisted ribbon as an adaptation of that originally developed by Boden and coworkers for twisted β-sheet stacks of peptides49,50 and subsequently sophisticated by Rüter et al.41. The model is based on a balance of interfacial tension and dispersion interactions between peptoid monomers: favorable hydrophobic association of the peptoids is driven by interfacial free energy that promotes the formation of wide twisted ribbons (i.e., nanohelices with large height, cf. Fig. 3b), whereas poorer stacking between peptoid monomers at large ribbon diameters imposes an energetic penalty on the dispersion interactions favors thin twisted ribbons (i.e., nanohelices with small height, cf. Fig. 3b). The critical parameter controlling the thermodynamically preferred ribbon width predicted by the model is a dimensionless parameter \(\kappa=\gamma l\delta /\varepsilon\) specifying the relative strengths of the interfacial free energy and peptoid-peptoid dispersion interactions, where \(\gamma\) is the interfacial tension, \(l\) is a characteristic length of a peptoid monomer, \(\delta\) is the characteristic spacing between peptoid layers in the ribbon, and \(\varepsilon\) is the characteristic energy scale for van der Waals dispersion interactions between peptoid monomers. Full details of the model are provided in the Supporting Information (Supplementary Fig. 7). As an accompaniment to the experimental data, we present in Fig. 3f the predictions of the model for the relative probabilities of twisted ribbons of various widths D for values of κ = [0.1, 1.0, 10]. Low pH conditions shift the chemical equilibrium of the Npm4Dig carboxylic acid group from –COO− to –COOH resulting in an increase in molecular hydrophobicity, an elevation of the surface tension, and an increase in κ. Conversely, high pH conditions favor the hydrophilic deprotonated form and result in a reduction of the hydrophobic interfacial tension and a lower value of κ. The trends in the model predictions are in good agreement with the experimental measurements in Fig. 3d, e, wherein lower pH conditions elevate κ and promote the formation of ribbons of greater thickness. This suggests that solution pH acts as a thermodynamic control of the twisted ribbon geometry by modulating the relative strength of the interfacial interactions of the peptoid monomers with the solvent and the dispersion interactions between peptoid monomers.
Controlling the supramolecular chirality of peptoid nanohelices
We next investigated the change of polar group chemistry in influencing the formation of peptoid nanohelices. Because recent studies have shown that the change of chirality of amino acids could be used to impact the handedness of self-assembled peptide nanohelices21,51,52, we thus replaced the achiral Dig group by L- or D-alanine group as the polar domain of the peptoid molecules (See Supporting Information for the synthesis details). Under a similar assembly condition (see Supporting Information for details), both Npm4-D-Ala and Npm4-L-Ala formed gel-like materials. ADF-STEM, AFM, and scanning electron microscopy (SEM) images confirmed that these gel-like materials contained a large amount of peptoid nanohelices with a dominant one single-handedness (Fig. 4, Supplementary Figs. 16–20), which Npm4-D-Ala led to the formation of left-handed nanohelices while L-Ala led to the formation of nanohelices with all right-handedness. Both XRD (Supplementary Fig. 21) and 13C ss-NMR (Supplementary Fig. 22) results showed that these obtained left-handed and right-handed helices exhibited similar XRD peaks and NMR signals, suggesting that the supramolecular chirality of peptoid nanohelices might not have direct correlation with the ordering of peptoids within the helical structures. It is worth mentioning that, while peptides containing L-amino acids are typically associated with the formation of left-handed nanohelices21,51,52, our results showed that L-Ala modified peptoid Npm4-L-Ala surprisingly formed right-handed nanohelices. Similarly, peptoid Npm4-D-Ala formed nanohelices with left-handedness which is opposite to the typical nanohelices assembled from peptides composed of D-amino acids51. Because these nanohelices assembled from either Npm4-L-Ala or Npm4-D-Ala exhibited a similar framework structure revealed by XRD and ss-NMR results (Supplementary Figs. 21–22), we concluded that the packing of hydrophobic Npm4 domains played a more role in the structural organization than the polar domain. Thus, in these Npm-derived peptoid nanohelix systems, the molecular chirality of Ala amino acid did not solely control the supramolecular chirality21 but played important role in the control over the supramolecular chirality of nanohelices together with the ordered structural organization of Npm4 domains. Similar nanohelical structures were observed when the polar side chain was neutral (Supplementary Fig. 23a, b) or a neutral hydroxy group was used as the polar domain (Npm4Noh, Supplementary Fig. 23c, d). In future work, we would like to employ enhanced sampling molecular dynamics simulations and free energy calculations to gain molecular-level insight into the relationship between the peptoid side-chain stereochemistry and the emergent supramolecular chirality and endeavor to rationalize the root of the opposite trend to that expected for peptide systems. Our future direction also includes the attachment of the hydrophobic Npm4 domain with other single amino acids, such as hydrophilic aspartic acid with either L- or D-aspartic form, to investigate the influence of single chiral amino acid on the supramolecular chirality of peptoid nanohelices. Therefore, we reason that modifying the hydrophobic domain of short assembling peptoids with single amino acid could provide a platform for controlling the formation of helical nanostructures showing dramatic differences in supramolecular chirality control from those assembled from peptides and proteins.
Discussion
In conclusion, we reported the assembly of short amphiphilic peptoids into nanohelices with controllable supramolecular chirality. By taking advantage of these short assembling sequences, we have developed a good understanding of the driving forces that led to the formation of chiral helices from achiral peptoids through the combination of experimental mechanistic studies, MD simulations, and theoretical modeling of the helix formation processes. Moreover, we demonstrated that the modification of assembling short peptoids with a single amino acid could lead to the formation of nanohelices with opposite handedness of those assembled from related peptides, highlighting the significant role of ordered structural packing of peptoid hydrophobic domains in the determination of supramolecular chirality of peptoid assemblies. The ability to precisely control the structural organization of sequence-defined peptoids and their supramolecular chirality of their assemblies opens the door to a system suitable to reveal how molecular interactions between fundamental chemical moieties control the arrangement, packing, and assembly of biomacromolecules and inorganic particles1,11,13,15,16,17,18,19,20,22, generating a wide range of protein-like, functional nanomaterials as nanocarriers for drug delivery35,44,53, as artificial enzymes for catalytic reactions8,54, and as scaffolds for biomimetic mineralization43,55,56.
Methods
Detailed information on materials and methods is available in the Supplementary Methods. Peptoids were synthesized using a modified solid-phase submonomer synthesis method as described previously33,54. The peptoids were synthesized in a 6 mL plastic vial, cleaved from the resin by addition of 95% trifluoroacetic acid in water, and then dissolved in water and acetonitrile (v/v = 1:1) for HPLC purification. Lyophilized and HPLC-grade peptoids were dissolved in the mixture of water and acetonitrile (v/v = 1:1) to make a 5-mM clear solution, which was then transferred to a 4 °C refrigerator for slow evaporation.
Data availability
All data are available within the Article and Supplementary Files, or available from the corresponding authors on request.
Code availability
Custom code is available from the corresponding author on request.
References
Chen, C. L. & Rosi, N. L. Peptide-based methods for the preparation of nanostructured inorganic materials. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 49, 1924–1942 (2010).
Chirat, R., Goriely, A. & Moulton, D. E. The physical basis of mollusk shell chiral coiling. PNAS https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2109210118 (2021).
Brodsky, B. & Ramshaw, J. A. M. The collagen triple-helix structure. Matrix Biol. 15, 545–554 (1997).
Brodsky, B. & Persikov, A. V. In Advance in Protein Chemistry. Vol. 70 301–339 (Academic Press, 2005).
Sun, C. et al. Molecular basis of regio- and stereo-specificity in biosynthesis of bacterial heterodimeric diketopiperazines. Nat. Commun. 11, 6251 (2020).
Kasprzyk-Hordern, B. Pharmacologically active compounds in the environment and their chirality. Chem. Soc. Rev. 39, 4466–4503 (2010).
Agranat, I., Caner, H. & Caldwell, J. Putting chirality to work: the strategy of chiral switches. Nat. Rev. Drug Discov. 1, 753–768 (2002).
Jian, T. et al. Highly stable and tunable peptoid/hemin enzymatic mimetics with natural peroxidase-like activities. Nat. Commun. 13, 3025 (2022).
Liu, M., Zhang, L. & Wang, T. Supramolecular chirality in self-assembled systems. Chem. Rev. 115, 7304–7397 (2015).
Yashima, E. et al. Supramolecular helical systems: helical assemblies of small molecules, foldamers, and polymers with chiral amplification and their functions. Chem. Rev. 116, 13752–13990 (2016).
Shao, L. et al. Hierarchical materials from high information content macromolecular building blocks: construction, dynamic interventions, and prediction. Chem. Rev. 122, 17397–17478 (2022).
Lee, C. C., Grenier, C., Meijer, E. W. & Schenning, A. P. H. J. Preparation and characterization of helical self-assembled nanofibers. Chem. Soc. Rev. 38, 671–683 (2009).
Bera, S. et al. Rigid helical-like assemblies from a self-aggregating tripeptide. Nat. Mater. 18, 503–509 (2019).
Du, C., Li, Z., Zhu, X., Ouyang, G. & Liu, M. Hierarchically self-assembled homochiral helical microtoroids. Nat. Nanotechnol. 17, 1294–1302 (2022).
Chen, C. L., Zhang, P. J. & Rosi, N. L. A new peptide-based method for the design and synthesis of nanoparticle superstructures: construction of highly ordered gold nanoparticle double helices. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 130, 13555–13557 (2008).
Cho, N. H. et al. Bioinspired chiral inorganic nanomaterials. Nat. Rev. Bioeng. 1, 88–106 (2023).
Lv, J. et al. Self-assembled inorganic chiral superstructures. Nat. Rev. Chem. 6, 125–145 (2022).
Kim, R. M. et al. Enantioselective sensing by collective circular dichroism. Nature 612, 470–476 (2022).
Lee, H.-E. et al. Amino-acid- and peptide-directed synthesis of chiral plasmonic gold nanoparticles. Nature 556, 360–365 (2018).
Zhang, Q. et al. Unraveling the origin of chirality from plasmonic nanoparticle-protein complexes. Science 365, 1475–1478 (2019).
Rubin, N., Perugia, E., Goldschmidt, M., Fridkin, M. & Addadi, L. Chirality of amyloid suprastructures. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 130, 4602–4603 (2008).
Li, Z., Cai, B., Yang, W. & Chen, C.-L. Hierarchical nanomaterials assembled from peptoids and other sequence-defined synthetic polymers. Chem. Rev. 121, 14031–14087 (2021).
Cai, B., Li, Z. & Chen, C.-L. Programming amphiphilic peptoid oligomers for hierarchical assembly and inorganic crystallization. Acc. Chem. Res. 54, 81–91 (2021).
Ghosh, P., Fridman, N. & Maayan, G. From distinct metallopeptoids to self-assembled supramolecular architectures. Chem. Eur. J. 27, 634–640 (2021).
Mannige, R. V. et al. Peptoid nanosheets exhibit a new secondary-structure motif. Nature 526, 415–420 (2015).
Sun, J. et al. Hierarchical supramolecular assembly of a single peptoid polymer into a planar nanobrush with two distinct molecular packing motifs. PNAS 117, 31639 (2020).
Jiao, F. et al. Self-repair and patterning of 2D membrane-like peptoid materials. Adv. Funct. Mater. 26, 8960–8967 (2016).
Chen, C. L., Zuckermann, R. N. & DeYoreo, J. J. Surface-directed assembly of sequence defined synthetic polymers into networks of hexagonally patterned nanoribbons with controlled functionalities. ACS Nano 10, 5314–5320 (2016).
Jin, H. et al. Designable and dynamic single-walled stiff nanotubes assembled from sequence-defined peptoids. Nat. Commun. 9, 270 (2018).
Xuan, S. & Zuckermann, R. N. Engineering the atomic structure of sequence-defined peptoid polymers and their assemblies. Polymer 202, 122691 (2020).
Murnen, H. K., Rosales, A. M., Jaworsk, J. N., Segalman, R. A. & Zuckermann, R. N. Hierarchical self-assembly of a biomimetic diblock copolypeptoid into homochiral superhelices. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 132, 16112–16119 (2010).
Zhao, M. et al. Hierarchical self-assembly pathways of peptoid helices and sheets. Biomacromolecules 23, 992–1008 (2022).
Jin, H. et al. Highly stable and self-repairing membrane-mimetic 2D nanomaterials assembled from lipid-like peptoids. Nat. Commun. 7, 12252 (2016).
Zuckermann, R. N., Kerr, J. M., Kent, S. B. H. & Moos, W. H. Efficient method for the preparation of peptoids oligo(N-substituted glycines) by submonomer solid-phase synthesis. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 114, 10646–10647 (1992).
Song, Y. et al. Highly bright and photostable two-dimensional nanomaterials assembled from sequence-defined peptoids. ACS Mater. Lett. 3, 420–427 (2021).
Greer, D. R. et al. Universal relationship between molecular structure and crystal structure in peptoid polymers and prevalence of the cis backbone conformation. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 140, 827–833 (2018).
Wang, M. et al. Peptoid-based programmable 2D nanomaterial sensor for selective and sensitive detection of H2S in live cells. ACS Appl. Bio Mater. 3, 6039–6048 (2020).
Chen, C. L. et al. Multidimensional frameworks assembled from silver(I) coordination polymers containing flexible bis(thioquinolyl) ligands: role of the intra- and intermolecular aromatic stacking interactions. Inorg. Chem. 42, 3738–3750 (2003).
Chen, C. L. & Beatty, A. M. Guest inclusion and structural dynamics in 2-D hydrogen-bonded metal-organic frameworks. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 130, 17222–17223 (2008).
Jeon, J., Yau, W.-M. & Tycko, R. Early events in amyloid-β self-assembly probed by time-resolved solid state NMR and light scattering. Nat. Commun. 14, 2964 (2023).
Rüter, A., Kuczera, S., Pochan, D. J. & Olsson, U. Twisted ribbon aggregates in a model peptide system. Langmuir 35, 5802–5808 (2019).
Li, Z. et al. Amphiphilic peptoid-directed assembly of oligoanilines into highly crystalline conducting nanotubes. Macromol. Rapid Commun. 43, 2100639 (2022).
Ma, J. et al. Nanoparticle-mediated assembly of peptoid nanosheets functionalized with solid-binding proteins: designing heterostructures for hierarchy. Nano Lett. 21, 1636–1642 (2021).
Luo, Y. et al. Bioinspired peptoid nanotubes for targeted tumor cell imaging and chemo-photodynamic therapy. Small 15, 1902485 (2019).
Hammons, J. A. et al. Early-stage aggregation and crystalline interactions of peptoid nanomembranes. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 12, 6126–6133 (2021).
Merrill, N. A. et al. Tunable assembly of biomimetic peptoids as templates to control nanostructure catalytic activity. Nanoscale 10, 12445–12452 (2018).
Henderson, J. A. et al. A guide to the continuous constant pH molecular dynamics methods in amber and CHARMM. Living J. Comput. Mol. Sci. 4, 1563 (2022).
Williams, S. J. Methoxyacetic acid esters: applications in protecting group and glycosylation chemistry. Carbohydr. Res. 486, 107848 (2019).
Smith, J. S. et al. A phylogenetically conserved NAD+-dependent protein deacetylase activity in the Sir2 protein family. PNAS 97, 6658–6663 (2000).
Nyrkova, I. A., Semenov, A. N., Aggeli, A. & Boden, N. Fibril stability in solutions of twisted-sheet peptides: a new kind of micellization in chiral systems. Eur. Phys. J. B 17, 481–497 (2000).
Song, C. et al. Tailorable plasmonic circular dichroism properties of helical nanoparticle superstructures. Nano Lett. 13, 3256–3261 (2013).
Wang, M. et al. Left or right: how does amino acid chirality affect the handedness of nanostructures self-assembled from short amphiphilic peptides? J. Am. Chem. Soc. 139, 4185–4194 (2017).
Cai, X. et al. Sequence-defined nanotubes assembled from IR780-conjugated peptoids for chemophototherapy of malignant glioma. Research 2021, 9861384 (2021).
Trinh, T. K. H. et al. Designed metal-containing peptoid membranes as enzyme mimetics for catalytic organophosphate degradation. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 15, 51191–51203 (2023).
Yang, W. et al. Designing sequence-defined peptoids for fibrillar self-assembly and silicification. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 634, 450–459 (2023).
Chien, Y.-C. et al. Using biomimetic polymers in place of noncollagenous proteins to achieve functional remineralization of dentin tissues. ACS Biomater. Sci. Eng. 3, 3469–3479 (2017).
Acknowledgements
This work was supported by the US Department of Energy (DOE), Office of Science, Office of Basic Energy Sciences (BES) as part of the Energy Frontier Research Centers program: CSSAS – The Center for the Science of Synthesis Across Scales – under Award Number DE-SC0019288 [FWP 72448 at Pacific Northwest National Laboratory (PNNL)]. The synthesis of peptoid Npm6Nce6 and Npm6Dig nanosheets was supported by DOE-BES biomolecular materials program under an award FWP 65357 at PNNL. XRD work was conducted at the Advanced Light Source (ALS) of Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, which was supported by the Office of Science (No. DE-AC02-05CH11231). Electron microscopy was performed on a project award (DOI: 10.46936/cpcy.proj.2022.60575/60008644) from the Environmental Molecular Sciences Laboratory (EMSL) at PNNL. Part of AFM and S/TEM experiments were conducted at the Molecular Analysis Facility, a National Nanotechnology Coordinated Infrastructure (NNCI) site at the University of Washington, which is supported in part by funds from the National Science Foundation (awards NNCI-2025489, NNCI-1542101). This work was completed in part with resources provided by the University of Chicago Research Computing Center. J.S.D. acknowledges a Washington Research Foundation Postdoctoral Fellowship, which supported some S/TEM measurements. PNNL is multi-program national laboratory operated for DOE by Battelle under Contracts No. DE-AC05-76RL01830.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
C.-L.C. conceived and directed the project. R.Z. performed the synthesis and assembly of peptoid materials. R.Z. performed AFM characterization and data analysis. R.Z., J.S.D. and Y.Z. performed S/TEM characterization and data analysis. C.-L.C. did XRD experiments. R.Z. and C.-L.C. analyzed XRD data. M.Z. and A.L.F. conducted the molecular dynamics simulations and the theoretical modeling. T.R.S. and A.P. performed solid-state-NMR experiments and data analysis. J.J.D.Y. discussed S/TEM and AFM results. R.Z., M.Z., A.F., J.S.D., T.R.S., A.P., and C.-L.C. wrote the manuscript. All authors discussed the results and commented on the manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
A.L.F. is a co-founder and consultant of Evozyne, Inc. and a co-author of US Patent Applications 16/887,710 and 17/642,582, US Provisional Patent Applications 62/853,919, 62/900,420, 63/314,898, 63/479,378, and 63/521,617, and International Patent Applications PCT/US2020/035206 and PCT/US2020/050466. The remaining authors declare no competing interests.
Peer review
Peer review information
Nature Communications thanks the anonymous reviewers for their contribution to the peer review of this work. A peer review file is available.
Additional information
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Zheng, R., Zhao, M., Du, J.S. et al. Assembly of short amphiphilic peptoids into nanohelices with controllable supramolecular chirality. Nat Commun 15, 3264 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-024-46839-y
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-024-46839-y
Comments
By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.