Correction to: Nature Communications https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-023-44554-8, published online 06 January 2024
The Authors provide the corrected text for the following issues marked as points A and B,
-
A.
Error location: Author list
Error: Missing symbol of equal contribution specifying the equal author contributions for the first <Huajie Wu> and second author <Yihang Li>.
Correction text: The original version of this Published Article omitted the symbol for the equal Authors contribution of the first two authors, <Huajie Wu> and <Yihang Li>. The correct way to display the Authors list is < Huajie Wu1,2, Yihang Li1,2, Wei Xu1, Fanze Kong1, Fu Zhang1> and a sentence should be added <2These authors contributed equally>.
-
B.
Error location: Text
Error: Scientific error in multiple sentences, missing word ref. in the points 1–4 (see below)
Correction text:
-
1.
The original version of this Article contained an error in <location: Pg. 2, left column, the second last paragraph in Introduction>, which incorrectly read <In addition19, relies on a future frame for detecting moving objects, which exacerbates the delay further>. The correct version is <In addition, ref. 19 relies on a future frame for detecting moving objects, which exacerbates the delay further.>
-
2.
The original version of this Article contained an error in <location: Pg. 2, left column, the second last paragraph in Introduction>, which incorrectly read ‘<Moreover21,22,23, are offline systems that require all LiDAR frames for occupancy map construction.>. The correct version is <Moreover, refs. 21,22,23 are offline systems that require all LiDAR frames for occupancy map construction.>
-
3.
The original version of this Article contained an error in <location: Pg. 9, right column, the second paragraph in Discussion:>, which incorrectly read <In contrast, the performance of learning-based methods, such as30, could drop considerably if the test dataset is different from the training dataset.>. The correct version is <In contrast, the performance of learning-based methods, such as ref. 30, could drop considerably if the test dataset is different from the training dataset.>.
-
4.
The original version of this Article contained an error in <location: Pg. 9, right column, the fourth paragraph in Discussion:>, which incorrectly read <Likewise, the occupancy map used in20-23 can address this ambiguity by distinguishing the unseen areas from seen ones.>. The correct version is <Likewise, the occupancy map used in refs. 20–23 can address this ambiguity by distinguishing the unseen areas from seen ones.>
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Wu, H., Li, Y., Xu, W. et al. Publisher Correction: Moving event detection from LiDAR point streams. Nat Commun 15, 1994 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-024-46400-x
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-024-46400-x
Comments
By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.
