Abstract
Nature is abundant in material platforms with anisotropic permittivities arising from symmetry reduction that feature a variety of extraordinary optical effects. Principal optical axes are essential characteristics for these effects that define light-matter interaction. Their orientation – an orthogonal Cartesian basis that diagonalizes the permittivity tensor, is often assumed stationary. Here, we show that the low-symmetry triclinic crystalline structure of van der Waals rhenium disulfide and rhenium diselenide is characterized by wandering principal optical axes in the space-wavelength domain with above π/2 degree of rotation for in-plane components. In turn, this leads to wavelength-switchable propagation directions of their waveguide modes. The physical origin of wandering principal optical axes is explained using a multi-exciton phenomenological model and ab initio calculations. We envision that the wandering principal optical axes of the investigated low-symmetry triclinic van der Waals crystals offer a platform for unexplored anisotropic phenomena and nanophotonic applications.
Similar content being viewed by others
Introduction
Symmetry plays a pivotal role in fundamental laws of nature1,2,3,4,5,6,7, including classical equations of motion, conservation laws, superposition principle, selection rules, and exchange interaction8,9,10,11. In condensed matter, it governs many of the material’s mechanical, electronic, and optical properties, such as stress tensor, electron mobility, conductivity, refractive index, and allowed nonlinear processes, among others12,13,14,15. Highly symmetric atomic lattices, such as Al, Ni, and Au, result in isotropy of electronic and optical properties, severely limiting their use16,17,18. For instance, they lack even-harmonic generation, birefringence, and chirality4,19,20. On the other hand, reducing the lattice’s symmetry group leads to the emergence of anisotropy – the change of particular property in the observation direction5,21. The most known consequence is the birefringence phenomenon, wherein a birefringent material doubles an image22. This effect is just one of the numerous implications of anisotropic optical properties, traditionally described via the permittivity tensor23. It effectively describes the difference in refractive indices along various directions. This anisotropy produces complex isofrequency contours in the reciprocal space24 enabling hyperbolic materials21, ghost1 and shear10,25 polaritons, negative refraction26,27, canalization of radiation4, and many other intriguing wave phenomena.
Van der Waals (vdW) crystals offer a flexible and highly functional platform with a built-in anisotropy due to their fundamental difference between intralayer covalent and interlayer vdW bonding28. Therefore, such layered materials allow exotic light-matter interactions29, resulting in exciton-30, phonon-31, edge-32, and moiré-polaritons33. In most cases, this anisotropy is purely uniaxial, and the principal optical axes of the permittivity tensor are stationary with wavelength28. Some vdW crystals, however, have biaxial anisotropy because of the in-plane low-symmetry crystal structure34,35,36,37,38. Combined with non-orthogonally polarized in-plane exciton resonances34, rhenium disulfide and rhenium diselenide can enable the wandering (wavelength-dispersive) direction of the principal optical axes of the permittivity tensor. Although the prediction of wavelength-dispersive principal optical axes dates back to 192839, experimental evidence of the discussed behavior has been elusive in inorganic crystals. We anticipate that more exotic optical responses and applications may be expected in materials with wandering principal optical axes, which can extend the evergrowing phenomena in low-symmetry nanophotonics40.
In this work, we experimentally observed the rotation of principal optical axes in triclinic vdW crystals. We explained it via a bi-excitonic model, also recreating the wandering of such principal optical axes with first-principle calculations of the permittivity tensor. Here, only the individual components of the obtained permittivity tensor satisfy the Kramers–Kronig (KK) relations. In contrast, the generalized KK relation for crystallographic axes41 is not applicable to triclinic rhenium disulfide (and diselenide). Hence, these crystals have extraordinary optical properties that set them apart from vdW and non-vdW crystals. Furthermore, from a practical point of view, our near-field nanoimaging results reveal high wavelength sensitivity of light-matter interaction in triclinic vdW crystals, which can be leveraged for advanced light routing. Thus, triclinic van der Waals rhenium disulfide (and diselenide) offer a platform for anisotropic phenomena and next-generation nanophotonics.
Results
Impact of triclinic crystal structure on optical axes
ReS2 and ReSe2 are ideal materials for asymmetry-driven phenomena since they exhibit the lowest symmetry triclinic crystal structure42, shown in Fig. 1a–c. Consequently, they received considerable interest in recent works34,35,36,37,43,44,45, which reported a high linear and nonlinear optical anisotropy originating from non-collinear excitons34. In particular, the angle between the polarizations of excitons46 is about 70° instead of the expected 90°. It arises from Peierls’ distortion of the 1 T structure (Fig. 1a)36. This feature should, naturally, cause nontrivial optical responses, such as non-orthogonal self-hybridized polaritons47. Therefore, a more thorough investigation of the anisotropic dielectric tensor \(\hat{\varepsilon }\) of ReS2 and ReSe2 remains a significant challenge both because their dielectric tensors cannot be diagonalized in Cartesian coordinates39 and for their great demand for low-symmetry photonics.
Nevertheless, according to Onsager’s theorem48, their dielectric tensors are symmetric (\(\hat{\varepsilon }={\hat{\varepsilon }}^{T}\)). They thus can be divided into Hermitian (Re[\(\hat{\varepsilon }\)]) and skew-Hermitian (Im[\(\hat{\varepsilon }\)]) parts (Fig. 1d–e), primarily responsible for polarization and losses, respectively. It is worth noting that the diagonalization basis for Hermitian and skew-Hermitian tensors can differ and vary with wavelengths, as schematically illustrated in Fig. 1d–e, which can result in wavelength-dispersive principal optical axes. In fact, principal optical axes rotation explains the effects observed in earlier reports35,38,49 on optical properties of ReS2 (Supplementary Note 1).
Physical origins of wandering principal optical axes
To visualize this effect, we prepared ReS2 and ReSe2 samples (Fig. 2a, b and Supplementary Note 2) and measured polarised transmittance (Fig. 2c) around the exciton resonances. Figure 2c demonstrates how the angle for maximum transmittance shifts for different excitons, showing that the principal optical axes change with exciton resonances. In order to capture its wavelength dependence, we provide polarization spectra in Fig. 2d–e for ReS2 and in Supplementary Note 2 for ReSe2. Note that excitonic spectral dips vanish at certain polarizations (Fig. 2d), indicating the orientation of excitons. Of immediate interest are wandering (wavelength-dispersive) principal optical axes, shown in Fig. 2e and Supplementary Note 2. In fact, a recent study50 showed that the principal optical axis at 550 and 650 nm tilts by 3° and 2°, respectively, with respect to the b-axis for few-layer ReS2, which is close to our 7° and 8° observed for bulk ReS2 (see Fig. 2e). At large wavelengths, the principal optical axes almost coincide with the crystallographic axes (Fig. 2e). However, the principal optical axes vary rapidly at fundamental exciton frequencies and then demonstrate complex behavior for high-energy photons, owing to the material’s rich excitonic structure51. Still, the crystallographic axes influence the position of the principal optical axes since, at the fundamental exciton resonances, the principal optical axes switch from the crystallographic b-axis to the a-axis (Fig. 2e). At infrared wavelengths, this wandering of principal optical axes reaches 65° whereas, for the whole spectral range, it exceeds 110° change, as seen in Fig. 2e.
Furthermore, this extraordinary optical response influences the Raman spectra (Supplementary Note 3). For instance, polarisation-resolved Raman measurements reveal the change of phonon modes’ preferential direction when the excitation wavelength switches from 532 nm to 633 nm and then to 780 nm (Supplementary Note 3). Although phonon modes’ directions have more complex behavior since they depend not only on the orientation of the principal optical axes but on the phonon modes themself, their dispersion follows a similar pattern to principal optical axes (Supplementary Note 3). This trend is unique to ReS2 and ReSe2, as we demonstrate in Supplementary Note 4, exemplifying a highly anisotropic As2S3 with static principal optical axes52. Indeed, As2S3 also has a reduced symmetry, which in principle, may cause a similar effect of wandering principal optical axes. However, unlike ReS2 and ReSe2, the crystal structure of As2S3 is close to orthorhombic phase with the following crystallographic parameters52: a = 0.42546(4) nm, b = 0.95775(10) nm, c = 1.14148(10) nm, α = 90°, β = 90.442°, and γ = 90°; because the monoclinic angle β differs from 90° by just 0.442(4)°. Moreover, As2S3 is transparent in the measured spectral interval (450–1350 nm) implying that its excitons lie below 450 nm, and hence, their effect is negligible52. In other words, an illustration of static principal optical axes in As2S3 highlights the nontrivial behavior of wandering principal optical axes in ReS2 and ReSe2 since the observed effect requires both strongly reduced crystal symmetry and the presence of material’s directional resonances: in our case excitons.
The observed behavior of the principal optical axes of ReS2 and ReSe2 can be described with a phenomenological bi-exciton model (Fig. 2f and Supplementary Note 5). According to this model, the permittivity tensor of ReS2 in the visible range can be expressed as:
where \({\omega }_{{{{{\mathrm{1,2}}}}}}\) is the resonant frequency of the exciton resonance, \({\gamma }_{{{{{\mathrm{1,2}}}}}}\) is its non-radiative decay rate, \({f}_{{{{{\mathrm{1,2}}}}}}\) is the rescaled oscillator strength, and \({{{{{{\boldsymbol{n}}}}}}}_{{{{{{\mathbf{1}}}}}}{{{{,}}}}{{{{{\mathbf{2}}}}}}}={({n}_{x},\, {n}_{y},\, {n}_{z})}^{T}\) is a unit vector describing the in-plane polarization of the corresponding excitonic transition. By varying the parameters of the permittivity model (\({\omega }_{i}\), \({\gamma }_{i}\), \({f}_{i}\)), we managed to find a dielectric tensor (Fig. 2g), which reproduces the wandering effect of ReS2 principal optical axes (Fig. 2h) within a phenomenological bi-exciton model. The satisfactory agreement between the two-exciton model and the experiment corroborates the leading role of excitons in the observed behavior.
Real-space nanoimaging of wandering principal optical axes
Wandering of ReS2 and ReSe2 principal optical axes opens the door to wavelength-switchable optics for efficient light manipulation. As a practical demonstration, we show the effect of wavelength–dispersive principal optical axes on waveguide mode propagation direction using a scattering scanning near-field optical microscopy (s-SNOM) in the transmission scheme, depicted in Fig. 3a. This scheme has no angular rotation (Supplementary Note 6) which makes it advantageous over the reflection scheme. Notably, the principal optical axes vary rapidly at fundamental exciton frequencies (see Fig. 2e and Supplementary Note 2). Therefore, for measurements, we focused on ReSe2 because it provides a strong variation in the orientation of the principal optical axes within the measured wavelength range of our s-SNOM setup (Methods). To eliminate the edge effect on the near-field image when launching the waveguide modes and launch those modes isotropically, we created a circular hole (the inset in Fig. 3a) inside the ReSe2 sample. It allows us to visualize the asymmetry of waveguide modes (Fig. 3b–d) caused by material anisotropy only: Fig. 3b–d show elliptical light propagation. As anticipated, these ellipses rotate with wavelength change, as seen from the position of their major axes in Fig. 3e–g (theoretical background of direction change which is provided in Supplementary Notes 7–9). Notably, the observed near-field mode is an interference between the air and waveguide modes. Still, according to our analysis, the air mode’s contribution to the rotation of the mode’s propagation direction is negligible with respect to the wavelength (see Supplementary Note 9). Hence, wandering (wavelength-dispersive) principal optical axes offer a platform to manipulate light without additional structuring and engineering.
Anisotropic dielectric tensors with wandering optical axes
Given the strong wavelength dispersion of the principal optical axes, it is challenging to describe the optical responses of ReS2 and ReSe2 correctly. Hence, we fitted the polarized transmittance spectra within the isotropic approximation as the initial step (see Supplementary Note 10). This approach yields a refractive index of about 4 in the infrared range, close to earlier reports35,38,49, and allows for distinguishing the fundamental excitonic transitions. In the next step, we irradiated samples with unpolarized light to obtain the optical properties averaged over polarization angles. Notably, the resulting optical constants do not follow Kramers–Kronig relations (see Supplementary Note 10) in contrast to other anisotropic vdW materials53. Consequently, ReS2 and ReSe2 exhibit anomalous optical responses even for unpolarized light due to the wavelength-dispersive principal optical axes.
To better understand the wandering of principal optical axes, we performed first-principle calculations of monolayer, bilayer, trilayer, and bulk ReS2 and ReSe2 anisotropic permittivity tensors, shown in Fig. 4 and Supplementary Note 9. As expected, the off-diagonal tensor elements (Fig. 4a and g) are nonzero, and tensors are not diagonalizable on the orthogonal basis (Supplementary Note 11) because of the crystal’s low symmetry. Nonetheless, we can decouple Hermitian and skew-Hermitian parts of tensors and diagonalize them separately, as shown in Fig. 4 and Supplementary Note 11. The diagonalization process also gives a diagonalization basis, which, in the case of the dielectric tensors, coincides with principal optical axes. Moreover, it allows us to directly observe a dramatic change of principal optical axes orientations from theoretical calculations (Fig. 4c–f and i-l), which agree with the experimental findings in Fig. 2, thereby unambiguously verifying the effect of wandering (wavelength-dispersive) principal optical axes in ReS2 and ReSe2. Moreover, the non-straight orientation of the principal optical axes of the permittivity tensor leads to slanted isofrequency surfaces with respect to the global z-axis (Supplementary Figure 21), which may enable interesting transmission phenomena, such as negative refraction and the super-prism effect54. Hence, the unique dielectric tensors of ReS2 and ReSe2 (Fig. 2 and Supplementary Figure 17) provide great flexibility in optical engineering.
Discussion
The permittivity tensor is the key optical characteristic of any artificial or natural material. It describes the material’s polarizability via the permittivity values and fundamental directions called principal optical axes, where birefringence is absent. Although for an overwhelming majority of inorganic materials, dielectric constant values are wavelength-dispersive, enabling numerous phenomena such as ultraslow light and Fano resonances55,56, principal optical axes remain static, which limits nanophotonics since this “degree of freedom” is unavailable. In this regard, triclinic van der Waals materials offer a platform for the emergence of wandering (wavelength-dispersive) principal optical axes appearing in far- and near-fields and in quantum mechanical calculations. This unconventional optical response was demonstrated for rhenium disulfide (diselenide) and was shown to originate from non-orthogonal exciton resonances. Furthermore, the properties associated with wandering principal optical axes can be observed in fields other than optics by considering the material’s non-Hermiticity arising from broken crystal symmetries. We also anticipate wandering principal optical axes in other low-symmetry crystals with triclinic and monoclinic structures, including GeS257, Lu2SiO558, CdWO425, β-phase Ga2O310, and many others10,25,57,58. These materials offer interesting opportunities for wavelength-switchable metamaterials, metasurfaces, waveguides, and cavities59,60,61,62.
Methods
Sample preparation
Bulk ReS2 and ReSe2 crystals were purchased from 2D Semiconductors (Scottsdale, USA) and micromechanically cleaved down on top of required substrates (Si/SiO2 and glass). Those substrates were subsequently decontaminated in acetone, isopropanol alcohol, and deionized water before the cleavage and then subjected to oxygen plasma removing the ambient adsorbates. Following plasma treatment, substrates were subjected to thermal treatment at temperatures of 120 °C and then exposed to scotch-tape from Nitto Denko Corporation (Osaka, Japan) with loaded bulk crystals of ReS2 and ReSe2. Eventually, the scotch-tape was removed, completing the cleavage procedure. The thickness of as-papered thin ReS2 and ReSe2 crystals was measured by an atomic force microscope (NT-MDT Spectrum Instruments, Ntegra II) in HybriD Mode using HA_NC tips with resonant frequency of 140 kHz and spring constant of 3.5 N/m.
Determination of principal optical axes
We used polarized microtransmittance measurement technique implemented on our Accurion nanofilm_ep4 ellipsometer to determine the principal optical axes. During the measurements, we aligned the polarizer and analyzer of the ellipsometer and fitted the obtained polarized microtransmittance for each wavelength by the expression: \({T}\left(\theta,\, \lambda \right)={a}^{2}{\cos }^{4}\left(\theta -\varphi \right)+{b}^{2}{\sin }^{4}\left(\theta -\varphi \right)+2{ab}{\cos }^{2}\left(\theta -\varphi \right){\sin }^{2}\left(\theta -\varphi \right)\cos \left(\Delta \phi \right)\), where \(T\left(\theta,\, \lambda \right)\) is the polarized microtransmittance, which depends on the polarizer’s/analyzer’s angle \(\theta\), and the incident wavelength \(\lambda\). \({a}^{2}\) and \({b}^{2}\) are the transmittances of beams polarized along in-plane principal optical axes, \(\Delta \phi\) is a phase difference between transmitted rays polarized along principal optical axes, and \(\varphi\) indicates the angular position of the principal optical axis (see blue points in Fig. 2e), whereas another principal optical axis is given by the sum \(\varphi+90^\circ\) (see red points in Fig. 2e).
Scanning near-field optical microscopy
The fabricated hole in ReSe2 was characterized by the amplitude- and phase-resolved scattering-type scanning near-field optical microscopy (s-SNOM) measurements using the “NeaSNOM” setup (Neaspec GmbH). The s-SNOM works as an atomic force microscope (AFM) in a tapping mode with a Pt-coated silicon tip oscillating at the resonance frequency of Ω ≈ 280 kHz with an amplitude of \(\sim\)50 nm. In the s-SNOM working at transmission configuration, the ReSe2 hole is illuminated from below by a linearly polarized light at a normal angle to the sample surface focused by a bottom parabolic mirror. As a light source, we used Ti:Sapphire continuous wave tuning laser (TiC, AVESTA Lasers and Optical Systems) with fiber coupling output, working at a wavelength range of λ = 700−1000 nm. While mapping the near-field signal and AFM topography around the hole with a scan area of 10×10 µm2, the illumination from the bottom parabolic mirror always remained aligned with the hole due to its synchronization moving with the sample during the scan. A top parabolic mirror collects the tip-scattered near-field signal and directs it into the highly sensitive photodetector. To achieve a clear near-field image, the optical background was suppressed by demodulation of the detected signal at high-order harmonic frequency nΩ (n = 2, 3, 4) and using an interferometric pseudoheterodyne detection scheme with a modulated reference beam via oscillating mirror. In this work, the demodulation signal at the third harmonic (3Ω) was taken, which is enough for background-free near-field detection.
First-principle calculations
Optical constants of the ReS2 and ReSe2 crystals were calculated within density functional theory (DFT) and GW approximation, as implemented in VASP package63. First, the atomic positions of both crystals were relaxed until the interatomic forces decreased below 10-3 eV/Å, while their unit cells were fixed. The lattice parameters were \(a=6.378\) Å, \(b=6.417\) Å, \(c=6.461\) Å with \(\alpha=91.62^\circ\), \(\beta=119.07^\circ\), \(\gamma=105.115^\circ\) for ReS2 and \(a=6.716\) Å, \(b=6.602\) Å, \(c=6.728\) Å with \(\alpha=104.90^\circ\), \(\beta=91.82^\circ\), \(\gamma=118.94^\circ\) for ReSe2. Next, we obtained ground-state one-electron wavefunctions from DFT and used them to initialize the GW routines. Finally, we calculated the imaginary and real parts of the frequency-dependent dielectric function within GW approximation and derived the refractive indices and extinction coefficients of the material. The cutoff energy for the plane-wave basis was set to 500 eV, while the first Brillouin zone was sampled with a \(\Gamma\)-centred 6\(\times\)6\(\times\)6 grid. The exchange correlation effects were described with a generalized gradient approximation (Perdew-Burke-Ernzerhof functional), and the behavior of wavefunctions in the core region was reconstructed with the projector augmented wave pseudopotentials.
Data availability
The relevant raw and generated data supporting the key findings of this study are available in the figshare database under accession code https://figshare.com/s/a1edc12b21d3a36315ab (https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.24967593). All data are available from the corresponding author upon a request.
References
Ma, W. et al. Ghost hyperbolic surface polaritons in bulk anisotropic crystals. Nature 596, 362–366 (2021).
Parimi, P. V., Lu, W. T., Vodo, P. & Sridhar, S. Imaging by flat lens using negative refraction. Nature 426, 404–404 (2003).
Krishnamoorthy, H. N. S., Jacob, Z., Narimanov, E., Kretzschmar, I. & Menon, V. M. Topological transitions in metamaterials. Science 336, 205–209 (2012).
Hu, G. et al. Topological polaritons and photonic magic angles in twisted α-MoO3 bilayers. Nature 582, 209–213 (2020).
Biswas, S., Grajower, M. Y., Watanabe, K., Taniguchi, T. & Atwater, H. A. Broadband electro-optic polarization conversion with atomically thin black phosphorus. Science 374, 448–453 (2021).
Zhang, Q. et al. Interface nano-optics with van der Waals polaritons. Nature 597, 187–195 (2021).
Gross, D. J. The role of symmetry in fundamental physics. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. 93, 14256–14259 (1996).
Livio, M. Why symmetry matters. Nature 490, 472–473 (2012).
Schwichtenberg, J. Physics from Symmetry. (Springer International Publishing, 2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-66631-0.
Passler, N. C. et al. Hyperbolic shear polaritons in low-symmetry crystals. Nature 602, 595–600 (2022).
Coissard, A. et al. Imaging tunable quantum Hall broken-symmetry orders in graphene. Nature 605, 51–56 (2022).
Tang, F., Po, H. C., Vishwanath, A. & Wan, X. Comprehensive search for topological materials using symmetry indicators. Nature 566, 486–489 (2019).
Guo, C. et al. Switchable chiral transport in charge-ordered kagome metal CsV3Sb5. Nature 611, 461–466 (2022).
Deb, S. et al. Cumulative polarization in conductive interfacial ferroelectrics. Nature 612, 465–469 (2022).
Yazdani, A. Magic, symmetry, and twisted matter. Science 371, 1098–1099 (2021).
Mahenderkar, N. K. et al. Epitaxial lift-off of electrodeposited single-crystal gold foils for flexible electronics. Science 355, 1203–1206 (2017).
Mason, P. E. et al. Spectroscopic evidence for a gold-coloured metallic water solution. Nature 595, 673–676 (2021).
Munkhbat, B., Canales, A., Küçüköz, B., Baranov, D. G. & Shegai, T. O. Tunable self-assembled Casimir microcavities and polaritons. Nature 597, 214–219 (2021).
Koshelev, K. et al. Subwavelength dielectric resonators for nonlinear nanophotonics. Science 367, 288–292 (2020).
Tang, Y. & Cohen, A. E. Enhanced enantioselectivity in excitation of chiral molecules by superchiral light. Science 332, 333–336 (2011).
Ma, W. et al. In-plane anisotropic and ultra-low-loss polaritons in a natural van der Waals crystal. Nature 562, 557–562 (2018).
Chen, X. et al. Solution-processed inorganic perovskite crystals as achromatic quarter-wave plates. Nat. Photonics 15, 813–816 (2021).
Dressel, M. & Grüner, G. Electrodynamics of Solids. (Cambridge University Press, 2002). https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511606168.
Hu, H. et al. Doping-driven topological polaritons in graphene/α-MoO3 heterostructures. Nat. Nanotechnol. 17, 940–946 (2022).
Hu, G. et al. Real-space nanoimaging of hyperbolic shear polaritons in a monoclinic crystal. Nat. Nanotechnol. 18, 64–70 (2023).
Hu, H. et al. Gate-tunable negative refraction of mid-infrared polaritons. Science 379, 558–561 (2023).
Sternbach, A. J. et al. Negative refraction in hyperbolic hetero-bicrystals. Science 379, 555–557 (2023).
Ermolaev, G. A. et al. Giant optical anisotropy in transition metal dichalcogenides for next-generation photonics. Nat. Commun. 12, 854 (2021).
Basov, D. N., Asenjo-Garcia, A., Schuck, P. J., Zhu, X. & Rubio, A. Polariton panorama. Nanophotonics 10, 549–577 (2020).
Hu, F. et al. Imaging exciton-polariton transport in MoSe2 waveguides. Nat. Photonics 11, 356–360 (2017).
Dai, S. et al. Tunable phonon polaritons in atomically thin van der waals crystals of boron nitride. Science 343, 1125–1129 (2014).
Li, P. et al. Optical nanoimaging of hyperbolic surface polaritons at the edges of van der Waals Materials. Nano Lett. 17, 228–235 (2017).
Sunku, S. S. et al. Photonic crystals for nano-light in moiré graphene superlattices. Science 362, 1153–1156 (2018).
Aslan, O. B., Chenet, D. A., van der Zande, A. M., Hone, J. C. & Heinz, T. F. Linearly Polarized Excitons in Single- and Few-Layer ReS2 Crystals. ACS Photonics 3, 96–101 (2016).
Mooshammer, F. et al. In-Plane Anisotropy in Biaxial ReS2 Crystals Probed by Nano-Optical Imaging of Waveguide Modes. ACS Photonics 9, 443–451 (2022).
Tongay, S. et al. Monolayer behaviour in bulk ReS2 due to electronic and vibrational decoupling. Nat. Commun. 5, 3252 (2014).
Zhang, S. et al. Quantum interference directed chiral raman scattering in two-dimensional enantiomers. Nat. Commun. 13, 1254 (2022).
Shubnic, A. A., Polozkov, R. G., Shelykh, I. A. & Iorsh, I. V. High refractive index and extreme biaxial optical anisotropy of rhenium diselenide for applications in all-dielectric nanophotonics. Nanophotonics 9, 4737–4742 (2020).
Szivessy, G. Kristalloptik. in Licht Als Wellenbewegung 635–904 (Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 1928). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-90780-7_11.
Krasnok, A. & Alù, A. Low-Symmetry Nanophotonics. ACS Photonics 9, 2–24 (2022).
Dressel, M. et al. Kramers-Kronig-consistent optical functions of anisotropic crystals: generalized spectroscopic ellipsometry on pentacene. Opt. Express 16, 19770 (2008).
Murray, H. H., Kelty, S. P., Chianelli, R. R. & Day, C. S. Structure of Rhenium Disulfide. Inorg. Chem. 33, 4418–4420 (1994).
Küçüköz, B., Munkhbat, B. & Shegai, T. O. Boosting Second-Harmonic Generation in Monolayer Rhenium Disulfide by Reversible Laser Patterning. ACS Photonics 9, 518–526 (2022).
Li, H. et al. Stretching ReS2 along different crystal directions: Anisotropic tuning of the vibrational and optical responses. Appl. Phys. Lett. 120, 063101 (2022).
Chakrabarty, D. et al. Interfacial anisotropic exciton-polariton manifolds in ReS2. Optica 8, 1488 (2021).
Lin, D. Y. et al. Anisotropy of Photoluminescence in Layered Semiconductors ReS2 and ReS2:Au. Solid State Phenom. 170, 135–138 (2011).
Gogna, R., Zhang, L. & Deng, H. Self-Hybridized, Polarized Polaritons in ReS2 Crystals. ACS Photonics 7, 3328–3332 (2020).
Andrieux, D. & Gaspard, P. Fluctuation theorem and Onsager reciprocity relations. J. Chem. Phys. 121, 6167–6174 (2004).
Munkhbat, B., Wróbel, P., Antosiewicz, T. J. & Shegai, T. O. Optical Constants of Several Multilayer Transition Metal Dichalcogenides Measured by Spectroscopic Ellipsometry in the 300–1700 nm Range: High Index, Anisotropy, and Hyperbolicity. ACS Photonics 9, 2398–2407 (2022).
Park, J. M., Lee, S., Na, W., Kim, K. & Cheong, H. Precise Determination of Offset between Optical Axis and Re-Chain Direction in Rhenium Disulfide. ACS Nano 16, 9222–9227 (2022).
Arora, A. et al. Highly anisotropic in-plane excitons in atomically thin and bulklike 1 T′-ReSe2. Nano Lett. 17, 3202–3207 (2017).
Slavich, A. S. et al. Exploring van der Waals materials with high anisotropy: geometrical and optical approaches. Preprint at https://arxiv.org/abs/2309.01989 [arxiv.org] (2023).
Ermolaev, G. et al. Topological phase singularities in atomically thin high-refractive-index materials. Nat. Commun. 13, 2049 (2022).
Kosaka, H. et al. Superprism phenomena in photonic crystals. Phys. Rev. B 58, R10096–R10099 (1998).
Tsakmakidis, K. L., Hess, O., Boyd, R. W. & Zhang, X. Ultraslow waves on the nanoscale. Science 358, eaan5196 (2017).
Limonov, M. F., Rybin, M. V., Poddubny, A. N. & Kivshar, Y. S. Fano resonances in photonics. Nat. Photonics 11, 543–554 (2017).
Wang, X. et al. Sub-Angstrom Characterization of the Structural Origin for High In-Plane Anisotropy in 2D GeS2. ACS Nano 14, 4456–4462 (2020).
Stokey, M. et al. Infrared active phonons in monoclinic lutetium oxyorthosilicate. J. Appl. Phys. 127, 115702 (2020).
Jahani, S. & Jacob, Z. All-dielectric metamaterials. Nat. Nanotechnol. 11, 23–36 (2016).
Liu, Y., Huang, Y. & Duan, X. Van der Waals integration before and beyond two-dimensional materials. Nature 567, 323–333 (2019).
Datta, I. et al. Low-loss composite photonic platform based on 2D semiconductor monolayers. Nat. Photonics 14, 256–262 (2020).
Trovatello, C. et al. Optical parametric amplification by monolayer transition metal dichalcogenides. Nat. Photonics 15, 6–10 (2021).
Kresse, G. & Furthmüller, J. Efficient iterative schemes for ab initio total-energy calculations using a plane-wave basis set. Phys. Rev. B 54, 11169–11186 (1996).
Acknowledgements
K.S.N. acknowledges support from the Ministry of Education, Singapore (Research Centre of Excellence award to the Institute for Functional Intelligent Materials, I-FIM, project No. EDUNC-33-18-279-V12) and from the Royal Society (UK, grant number RSRP\R\190000). S.M.N. acknowledges the financial support from the Ministry of Science and Higher Education (agreement No. 075-15-2022-1150). A.S.S. and A.N.T. gratefully acknowledge the financial support from the RSF (grant No. 22-19-00558). D.A.G., A.V.A., and V.S.V. acknowledge support by the Higher Education and Science Committee of the Ministry of Education, Science, Culture, and Sport of the Republic of Armenia Project No. 23RL-2A031. L.M.M acknowledges Project PID2020-115221GB-C41, financed by MCIN/AEI/10.13039/501100011033, and the Aragon Government through Project Q-MAD.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
D.G.B., D.A.G., A.V.A., L. M.-M., K.S.N., and V.S.V. suggested and directed the project. G.A.E., D.V.G., A.S.S., M.K.T., D.I.Y., V.R.S., S.M.N., and E.S.Z. performed the measurements and analyzed the data. A.N.T., R.V.K., and D.A.G. prepared the samples. G.A.E., K.V.V., D.V.G., I.M.F., A.M., I.K., A.A.V., and D.G.B. provided theoretical support. G.A.E. wrote the original manuscript. G.A.E., D.G.B., D.A.G., A.V.A., L. M.-M., K.S.N., and V.S.V. reviewed and edited the paper. All authors contributed to the discussions and commented on the paper.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Peer review
Peer review information
Nature Communications thanks the anonymous reviewers for their contribution to the peer review of this work. A peer review file is available.
Additional information
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary information
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Ermolaev, G.A., Voronin, K.V., Toksumakov, A.N. et al. Wandering principal optical axes in van der Waals triclinic materials. Nat Commun 15, 1552 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-024-45266-3
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-024-45266-3
Comments
By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.