Introduction

Manipulation of electron spin polarization is an essential topic of spintronics1,2,3. An attractive approach to generating and controlling spin currents is the use of light, and new principles of light conversion into spin currents have been explored, including a light-helicity-dependent control of spin-polarized currents in semiconductors4 and topological insulators5,6, laser-generated superdiffusive spin currents in magnetic multilayers7, propagation control of spin waves in a magnetic insulator8, generation of pure spin currents by optical quantum interference effect9 and surface plasmon excitation10, and spin-dependent scattering11,12. In the last of these techniques, pure spin currents are converted into spin-polarized DC electric currents under an applied magnetic field, generating the magneto-photogalvanic effect (MPGE)13,14,15. However, a universal method for manipulating spin currents with full-directional controllability and tunable magnitude, independent of specific material properties and not limited to low-temperature operation, has not been established.

Advances in nanofabrication technology can overcome the fundamental limitations imposed by nature. Metamaterials are engineered artificial materials that elicit new responses, not exhibited by the original substance, using tailored subwavelength structures16. The required material functionality can be achieved by designing the shape, size, period, and mutual arrangement of the constituent nanostructures. This deceptively simple yet powerful concept enables the realization of many unprecedented optical properties such as negative refractive index17, super-resolution imaging18, cloaking19 and perfect absorption of electromagnetic waves20.

During the past 20 years, metamaterials have entered the realm of nonlinear optics21. Especially, the introduction of noncentrosymmetry enables second-order nonlinear optical effects such as second harmonic generation (SHG), which requires, in the leading order, the breaking of space inversion symmetry. Consequently, nonlinear optical processes forbidden in centrosymmetric media are allowable in metamaterials22. The introduction of magnetism into noncentrosymmetric metamaterials causes attractive magneto-optical responses such as magnetic-field controllable SHG23,24 and nonreciprocal optical magnetoelectric effect25, originating from the breaking of both space inversion and time-reversal symmetries. The MPGE, which are used in this study as the principle of photo-driven ultrafast spin current generation, can be allowed under the same conditions. The MPGE (called the magnetic ratchet effect in artificial periodic structures) has been detected in metamaterials with nonmagnetic superlattices26,27. However, it has never been observed in magnetic metamaterials (MMs).

In this study, we report the observation of MPGE in noncentrosymmetric MMs with artificially built-in threefold rotational symmetry and out-of-plane magnetization. Reflecting this particular symmetry and remanent zero-field magnetization, the direction and magnitude of spin-driven and potentially spin-polarized photocurrents are fully controlled without any external bias fields by tuning the polarization state of the excitation light. The spin-switchable nature of photocurrents under weak external magnetic fields allows for the additional functionality of spin current manipulation. Our experimental results, which are entirely consistent with symmetry predictions, show that nanoscale symmetry engineering can convert already known magnets into functional opto-spintronic materials working at room temperature.

Results

Magneto-photogalvanic effect and magnetic metamaterial design

The MPGE is a second-order nonlinear optical effect and can be phenomenologically expressed as13,14,15

$${J}_{i}={\beta }_{ijk}^{{{{{{{{{{{{\rm{m}}}}}}}}}}}}}(0;\omega,-\omega ){E}_{j}(\omega ){E}_{k}^{*}(\omega ).$$
(1)

Here, Ej(ω) and $${E}_{k}^{*}(\omega )$$ = Ek( − ω) denote the j- and k-polarized electric fields, respectively, of the incident light wave at ω. These fields induce the i-directed zero-bias photocurrent Ji proportional to the square of the AC electric field; that is, to the intensity of the light. The third-rank polar tensor $${\beta }_{ijk}^{{{{{{{{{{{{\rm{m}}}}}}}}}}}}}$$ changes the sign under either a time-reversal or space-inversion operation, and is determined by the magneto-crystalline symmetry of the system. Unlike the conventional (nonmagnetic) photogalvanic effect, in which the photocurrent direction reverses only under a space-inversion operation, the photocurrent driven by the MPGE reverses under both space-inversion and time-reversal operations. This makes the MPGE photocurrent in magnetic materials both spin-driven and spin-switchable15. A flexible nanostructure design not only elicits the second-order nonlinear optical effects in metamaterials28, but also enables the manipulation of photo-driven ultrafast spin currents via the MPGE in properly designed MMs. This sophisticated manipulation is possible because the carriers in ferro- and ferri-magnetic materials carry a net spin angular momentum under an external DC electric field.

To demonstrate this novel artificially engineered opto-spintronic functionality, we designed a model MM system that generates polarization-controlled tunable directional spin-driven photocurrents (Fig. 1a). We fabricated the MM with a centrosymmetric Co/Pt ferromagnetic metallic multilayer film with out-of-plane magnetization (Fig. 1b). It consists of periodic triangle-hole-arrayed nanostructures (antidot lattice) with threefold rotational symmetry. This particular symmetry is necessary to control the direction and magnitude of zero-bias photocurrents due to angular momentum conservation in second-order nonlinear optical processes28. The out-of-plane magnetization preserves the artificially built-in threefold rotational symmetry of the MM. Owing to the exchange splitting of the conduction band, carriers in the Co/Pt multilayer film are spin-polarized with an approximate polarization degree of 50%29 (the ratio of spin-up and spin-down electron densities near the Fermi level is ~ 3: 1).

When an arbitrarily polarized incident light (polarization angle θω, ellipticity angle εω) excites a MM with threefold rotational symmetry and out-of-plane magnetization Mz, zero-bias spin-driven photocurrents Jm can be generated via the MPGE (Fig. 1a). Considering the magnetic point group of the MM as $$3m^{\prime}$$ and assuming only one independent MPGE tensor component βm, the magnitude Jm and flow direction θm of Jm under ± Mz are respectively defined as30

$$|{{{{{{{{{{{{\bf{\,J}}}}}}}}}}}}}_{{{{{{{{{{{{\rm{m}}}}}}}}}}}}} |=|{\beta }^{{{{{{{{{{{{\rm{m}}}}}}}}}}}}}|{{{{{{{{{\rm{cos}}}}}}}}}} 2{\varepsilon }_{\omega }\qquad (-4{5}^{\circ }\le {\varepsilon }_{\omega }\le 4{5}^{\circ }),$$
(2)
$${\theta }_{{{{{{{{{{{{\rm{m}}}}}}}}}}}}}=\left\{\begin{array}{ll}-2{\theta }_{\omega }\mp 9{0}^{\circ }\qquad \quad &({\beta }^{{{{{{{{{{{{\rm{m}}}}}}}}}}}}} > 0)\\ -2{\theta }_{\omega }\pm 9{0}^{\circ }\qquad \quad &({\beta }^{{{{{{{{{{{{\rm{m}}}}}}}}}}}}} < 0)\end{array}\right.,$$
(3)

where Jm and θm can be independently controlled by εω and θω of the excitation light, respectively (see Methods for a symmetry analysis). Figure 1c, d plot Jm and θm as functions of the polarization state of the excitation light, respectively, when βm > 0. Note that reversing Mz does not change Jm but flips θm. Therefore, the direction and magnitude of the spin-driven photocurrents can be controlled and tuned, respectively, by controlling the polarization state of the excitation light. These relations are purely determined by the artificially built-in symmetry of the MM and (unlike the valley-dependent optical selection rules in transition metal dichalcogenides31) are not restricted to specific material properties or excitation wavelength.

Zero-bias spin-driven photocurrents

The MM was illuminated by a normal incident 800-nm femtosecond laser pulse (see Methods for experimental details). First, we measured the photocurrent Jx along the x direction across the unbiased MM with opposite out-of-plane saturation magnetization ± Mz under linearly y-polarized irradiation (θω = εω = 0°) (Fig. 2a). The magnitude of the detected zero-bias photocurrent scales linearly with light intensity (Fig. 2b). The light-to-current conversion ratio ( ~ 40 pA W−1cm2) is similar to that obtained by the circular photogalvanic effect in Bi2Se35, where spin-polarized photocurrents were induced by optically driving the Dirac cone with oblique-incidence circularly polarized light. In the present experiments, all helicity-dependent spin photocurrents, such as the spin-galvanic effect4 and circular photogalvanic effect5 are forbidden because the light is linearly polarized. In addition, the photocurrent observed here cannot be explained by the conventional (nonmagnetic) photogalvanic effect13 (see Supplementary Figs. 3, 4, 6 and Supplementary Discussion) or by the shift current mechanism32,33. The photocurrent, whose direction is flipped by the time-reversal operation (reversal of Mz, Fig. 2b), can be explained only by the MPGE. We confirmed that the nonstructured centrosymmetric Co/Pt multilayer film do not generate zero-bias photocurrents for excitation light of any polarization.

The artificially built-in asymmetry in our MM imbalances the distribution of photoexcited carriers between the states with positive and negative wavevectors in the spin-up and spin-down subbands, causing electrons flows within each spin subband. As spin-up and spin-down electrons move in opposite directions through spin-dependent scattering, spin currents are generated11,12. In a spin-polarized system, different populations of the two spin subbands yield a net electron flow. Thus, spin polarization of the zero-bias photocurrents can be detected as an electric current whose direction is switched by reversing Mz. Time-resolved measurements reveal a sub-nanosecond response, although the rise- and fall-time responses are limited by the bandwidth of the instruments used in this experiment (Fig. 2c).

To clarify the coupling of the photocurrent to Mz, the magnetic-field dependence of Jx is plotted in Fig. 2d. The magnitude and sign of Jx suddenly change while sweeping the external out-of-plane magnetic field, yielding a ferromagnetic hysteresis with an antisymmetric closed loop. This behavior directly reflects spin polarization in the conduction band of the MM, as further evidenced by the measured magnetic-field dependence of the Faraday rotation θF (Fig. 2e). Therefore, the flow direction of the zero-bias photocurrents generated in our MM is directly coupled to the spin-polarization direction.

Full-directional control of the spin-driven photocurrents

To demonstrate the directional controllability of the spin-driven photocurrents, we rotated the polarization plane of the linearly polarized light (θω = 0° − 360°, εω = 0°) and separately detected the photocurrents along the x and y directions (Fig. 3a). According to Eqs. (2) and (3), continuous rotation of θω through 180° achieves full-directional control of Jm with constant magnitude (Fig. 3b and c). When plotted against θω, the spin-driven photocurrents Jm,x and Jm,y exhibits $$-{{{{{{{{{\rm{cos}}}}}}}}}}\, 2{\theta }_{\omega }$$ and $$-{{{{{{{{{\rm{sin}}}}}}}}}}\,2{\theta }_{\omega }$$ behaviors, respectively (Fig. 3d). Reflecting the nearly identical amplitudes of Jm,x and Jm,y, Jm$$(=\sqrt{{(\,{J}_{{{{{{{{{{{{\rm{m}}}}}}}}}}}},x})}^{2}+{(\,{J}_{{{{{{{{{{{{\rm{m}}}}}}}}}}}},y})}^{2}})$$ is almost independent of θω (Fig. 3e). In contrast, θm$$(={{{{{{{{{{\rm{tan}}}}}}}}}} }^{-1}(\,{J}_{{{{{{{{{{{{\rm{m}}}}}}}}}}}},x}/{J}_{{{{{{{{{{{{\rm{m}}}}}}}}}}}},y}))$$ is a continuous function of θω; specifically, θm = − 2θω − 90° (Fig. 3f). These behaviors are consistent with the above prediction. Overall, Fig. 3d-f demonstrate that by changing θω of the linearly polarized excitation light, spin-driven photocurrents with θω-invariant magnitude can be directionally controlled through 360° in the two-dimensional (2D) plane of the MM. This is clearly different from the helicity-dependent bidirectional photocurrents observed in the Co/(nonmagnet)/Pt magnetic heterostructures34.

Applying Eqs. (2) and (3), we further investigated whether a directional spin-driven photocurrent can be generated under an arbitrarily polarized light. For this purpose, we inserted a quarter-wave plate (QWP) after rotating the polarization angle φω of the initially linearly polarized light, which modified both θω and εω of the excitation light (Fig. 4a). The polarization state of the excitation light is then determined by φω and the rotation angle α of the QWP optical axis. In this setup, we can continuously modulate εω with θω = 0°/90° at α = 0° and θω = 45°/135° at α = 45° (marked by the thick arrows in Fig. 4b, c, respectively), providing simultaneous control of Jm and θm.

To confirm this prediction, we investigated the spin-driven photocurrents Jm,x and Jm,y as functions of φω. Jm,x (Jm,y) shows $$-{{{{{{{{{\rm{cos}}}}}}}}}}\, 2{\varphi }_{\omega }$$ ($$-{{{{{{{{{\rm{sin}}}}}}}}}}\, 2{\varphi }_{\omega }$$) dependence on φω whereas Jm,y (Jm,x) is vanishingly small at α = 0° (α = 45°) (upper (lower) panel of Fig. 4d). When plotted as a function of εω, Jm exhibits the same behaviors at α = 0° and 45° (Fig. 4e); specifically, $$|{{{{{{{{{{{{\bf{\,J}}}}}}}}}}}}}_{{{{{{{{{{{{\rm{m}}}}}}}}}}}}}|\propto {{{{{{{{{\rm{cos}}}}}}}}}} 2{\varepsilon }_{\omega }$$. Therefore, the magnitude can be tuned from 100% to 0% by switching from linear (εω = 0°) to circular (εω = ± 45°) polarization. Meanwhile, θm can be independently controlled by θω through the universal relation θm = − 2θω − 90° at α = 0° and 45° (Fig. 4e, inset), as observed under linearly polarized light (Fig. 3f). Thus, the polarization information of an arbitrarily polarized light is converted into the magnitude and flow direction of spin-driven photocurrents.

Discussion

Based on microscopic calculations, we briefly explain the mechanism of photo-driven rectified charge and spin currents. Considering the dependence on the intensity of the excitation light, the experimentally observed light-induced DC current originates from the second-order photoelectric field, as is the case for the MPGE. The present MPGE can be attributed to the magnetic injection current15

$${\beta }_{\mu ;\nu \lambda }^{{{{{{{{{{{{\rm{Inj}}}}}}}}}}}}}=\frac{-\pi {q}^{3}}{\gamma }\int \frac{d{{{{{{{{{{{\bf{k}}}}}}}}}}}}}{{\left(2\pi \right)}^{2}}\mathop{\sum}\limits_{a\ne b}\left({v}_{aa}^{\mu }-{v}_{bb}^{\mu }\right){g}_{ab}^{\nu \lambda }\frac{\gamma }{\pi }\frac{f({E}_{a})-f({E}_{b})}{{\gamma }^{2}+{(\hslash \omega -{E}_{b}+{E}_{a})}^{2}},$$
(4)

where q and γ are the elementary charge of carriers and the phenomenological scattering rate, respectively. Ea(k) is the energy of one-particle, f(x) is the Fermi-Dirac distribution function, vμ is the velocity operator, and gνλ is the band-resolved quantum metric parametrized by the crystal momentum k and band indices a and b35,36. The injection current arises from resonant excitation of the electron-hole pairs and shows a diverging behavior in clean materials. As our MM is a conductor, intraband dynamics may also contribute to the (magneto-)photogalvanic response to linearly polarized light36. However, such intraband effects are expected to be negligible unless the frequency of light is as low as that of the THz waves37. Additionally, we ignore the Fermi-surface contribution because the frequency of the irradiating light is comparable to the bandwidth ( ~ 1 eV)38. The photogalvanic effect can be caused by the magnetic injection current only when the linearly polarized light is applied to systems where both space inversion and time-reversal symmetries are broken. These conditions are met by the MPGE discussed above.

In contrast, the spin photogalvanic effect (photo-driven rectified pure spin current) is formulated by calculating the spin current expectation value36. In the paramagnetic state denoted by the magnetic point group $$3m1^{\prime}$$, the dominant spin photogalvanic effect may occur due to the “spin” (linear) injection current denoted by

$${\tilde{\beta }}_{\alpha \mu ;\nu \lambda }^{{{{{{{{{{{{\rm{SpInj}}}}}}}}}}}}}=\frac{-\pi {q}^{2}}{\gamma }\int \frac{d{{{{{{{{{{{\bf{k}}}}}}}}}}}}}{{\left(2\pi \right)}^{2}}\mathop{\sum}\limits_{a\ne b}\left({j}_{aa}^{\alpha ;\mu }-{j}_{bb}^{\alpha ;\mu }\right){g}_{ab}^{\nu \lambda }\frac{\gamma }{\pi }\frac{f({E}_{a})-f({E}_{b})}{{\gamma }^{2}+{(\hslash \omega -{E}_{b}+{E}_{a})}^{2}},$$
(5)

which indicates the α-polarized spin current flow along the μ-direction under linearly polarized light. This formula is identical to that of the magnetic injection current (Eq. (4)) but with the velocity operator vμ in Eq. (4) replaced with the spin current operator jα;μ. The spin current operator is naively defined as {sα, vμ}/2, where sα is the spin operator. According to symmetry analysis, the allowed spin photogalvanic effect in the paramagnetic state is

$${\tilde{\beta }}_{zx;xx}=-{\tilde{\beta }}_{zx;yy}=-{\tilde{\beta }}_{zy;xy}=-{\tilde{\beta }}_{zy;yx},$$
(6)

for the z-polarized spin current and

$${\tilde{\beta }}_{xy;xx}=-{\tilde{\beta }}_{xy;yy}={\tilde{\beta }}_{yy;xy}={\tilde{\beta }}_{yy;yx}={\tilde{\beta }}_{yx;xx}=-{\tilde{\beta }}_{yx;yy}=-{\tilde{\beta }}_{xx;xy}=-{\tilde{\beta }}_{xx;yx},$$
(7)

for the spin current whose polarization is in the xy plane.

Notably, the z-polarized spin current exhibits the same polarization dependence as the MPGE. This coincidence can be intuitively understood by the following arguments. The large exchange splitting ( ~ 1 eV) in ferromagnetic cobalt causes nonequivalence of the spin-up and spin-down states. The photo-driven spin current is then converted into a strongly spin-polarized charge current, whereas the spin current carries no charge carriers in the paramagnetic state. Supporting this argument, both the z-polarized spin photocurrent and charge photocurrent follow the same polarization dependence originating from the same microscopic mechanism (namely, the injection mechanism). From these theoretical arguments on the experimental observations, the spin-polarized photocurrent is inferred to be controlled by the magnetic moment of the MM and the polarization state of the incident light.

The results of this proof-of-principle experiment newly demonstrate that nanoscale engineering of a standard spintronic thin film enables full manipulation of spin-driven photocurrents and can be applied to a broad range of ferro- and ferri-magnetic materials in general. The experimental results were entirely consistent with symmetry predictions, implying that our work can provide a guiding principle for the design and creation of artificially engineered opto-spintronic nanodevices and/or magnetic metasurfaces operating at room temperature. This study is complemented by ongoing successful explorations of novel magneto-optical and magnetoelectric functionalities in recently discovered 2D magnetic materials and heterostructures39,40. Widely tunable nanostructures and highly spin-polarized materials such as half metals may generate intense spin-polarized photocurrents. Combining the potential for ultrafast photocurrent generation41 with propagation through materials with long spin diffusion lengths (such as graphene)42, efficient spin-polarized currents could be transferred into a ferromagnet. This approach can potentially control the magnetization direction via a spin-transfer torque on sub-picosecond timescales43.

Our work can also guide the search for spin- and polarization-controllable THz devices and photovoltaic materials15. Recent studies have clarified the mechanisms of bulk photocurrent in magnetic systems and discussed applications for probing magnetic states35,36. However, magnetic domain formation is a serious problem in bulk magnets. For instance, the photocurrent developed no hysteresis in ferromagnetic topological insulators6. In the present paper, the spin-driven photocurrents due to large exchange splitting were demonstrated in a controllable way without magnetic domain formation and surpassed the photocurrents of nonmagnetic origin (see Supplementary Fig. 6). Thus, MMs are an ideal platform for future studies and applications of photocurrent generation on magnetic materials.

Methods

Preparation of magnetic metamaterial

To incorporate novel opto-spintronic functionality into a standard ferromagnet, we fabricated a MM consisting of periodic triangle-hole-arrayed nanostructures (antidot lattice) with threefold rotational symmetry (Fig. 1b). Onto a two-sided polished SiO2 substrate, we sequentially deposited a 5-nm-thick SiN layer, a 2-nm-thick Pt layer, a [Pt(0.9 nm)/Co(0.5 nm)]5 ferromagnetic multilayer, and a 2-nm-thick Pt layer. The deposition was performed by radio-frequency magnetron sputtering. Subsequently, triangular holes were created by electron beam lithography over an area of 250 × 250 μm2, followed by Ar ion etching. The side lengths of each triangular hole and the period of the triangular lattice were 480 nm and 558 nm, respectively, sufficiently shorter than the wavelength of the excitation light. The fabricated MM was evaluated by an atomic force microscope (Fig. 1a, inset). The single triangular hole structure belongs to point group 3m, and its planar periodic array belongs to the p3m1 plane group with 3m point symmetry. At room temperature the Co/Pt ferromagnetic multilayer film exhibits out-of-plane magnetization that preserves the artificially built-in threefold rotational symmetry of the MM but breaks the time-reversal symmetry (the magnetic point group $$3m^{\prime}$$). Thus, our MM breaks both the space inversion and time-reversal symmetries, providing the necessary condition for observing the MPGE.

Photocurrent measurements

To demonstrate the polarization-controlled tunable directional spin-driven photocurrents, the short-circuit photocurrents were measured across the unbiased MM (see Supplementary Fig. 1 for the device structure). The surrounding unstructured Co/Pt multilayer film was used as the electrodes. The excitation source was a Ti:sapphire ultrafast oscillator (Spectra-Physics, Mai Tai HP) operating at 690–1040 nm with a pulse width of 100 fs and a repetition rate of 80 MHz. The polarization state of the excitation light was controlled by a set of waveplates. A rotatable half-wave plate controlled the polarization angle θω of the incident light and an optional QWP modulated the ellipticity angle εω simultaneously with θω (Fig. 4a). The MM was mounted in an electromagnet and its out-of-plane magnetization Mz was controlled by applying out-of-plane magnetic fields. The laser beam was delivered to the MM at normal incidence using an optical microscope. The spot delivered to the MM ( ~ 250 μm) was comparable in size to the nanostructured region. The laser power irradiated on the MM was typically ~ 100 mW, corresponding to a peak intensity of ~ 200 Wcm−2. The laser beam passed through the MM to a charge-coupled device camera that monitored its position on the MM. The laser spot was carefully positioned at the center of the MM to exclude laser heating-induced thermoelectric currents such as the Seebeck effect5 and the anomalous Nernst effect44. The intensity of the laser beam was modulated at f ~ 1 kHz by an optical chopper. The short-circuit photocurrents were separately measured along the x and y directions by a two-phase lock-in amplifier (Stanford Research Systems, SR865) with the reference signal from the optical chopper. Thus, the photocurrent signals were evaluated as a time-averaged discharge current from the MM. The magnitude Jm and flow direction θm of the spin-driven photocurrents were calculated as $$|{{{{{{{{{{{{\bf{\,J}}}}}}}}}}}}}_{{{{{{{{{{{{\rm{m}}}}}}}}}}}}} |=\sqrt{{(\,{J}_{{{{{{{{{{{{\rm{m}}}}}}}}}}}},y})}^{2}+{\,(\,{J}_{{{{{{{{{{{{\rm{m}}}}}}}}}}}},y})}^{2}}$$ and $${\theta }_{{{{{{{{{{{{\rm{m}}}}}}}}}}}}}={\tan }^{-1}(\,{J}_{{{{{{{{{{{{\rm{m}}}}}}}}}}}},x}/{J}_{{{{{{{{{{{{\rm{m}}}}}}}}}}}},y})$$, respectively.

The dynamical response of the photocurrents was measured with a digitizing storage oscilloscope (LeCroy, WaveRunner8104; bandwidth of 1 GHz) through a wide-band preamplifier (Stanford Research Systems, SR445A; bandwidth of 350 MHz). During the measurements, the MM was illuminated by a Ti:sapphire regenerative amplifier system (Spectra-Physics, Hurricane) operating at 800 nm with a pulse width of ~ 130 fs and a repetition rate of 1 kHz. The laser power irradiated on the MM was typically ~ 0.1 mW ( ~ 0.1 μJ/pulse). The time trace of the photocurrent was averaged 5000 times. The response was broadened by the response time of the preamplifier and was followed by oscillations (Fig. 2c) due to impedance mismatch in the circuit. All measurements were performed at room temperature in air.

The magnetization curves of the unstructured Co/Pt multilayer film and MM were evaluated using Faraday rotation measurements under the 800 nm laser light used for the photocurrent measurements (see Fig. 2e and Supplementary Fig. 2). Due to the Faraday effect, the plane of the linearly polarized light rotates after passing through the magnetic materials. The Faraday rotation angle θF, measured using a conventional balanced detection technique, is proportional to Mz.

Linear optical measurements

The linear transmittance (T) and reflectivity (R) spectra of the unstructured Co/Pt multilayer film and MM were measured over the 250–2500 nm range using a commercial spectrometer (JASCO, MSV-5200). The absorption (A) spectra were calculated as A = 1 − T − R (see Supplementary Fig. 5).

Symmetry analysis of the magneto-photogalvanic effect

Under the magnetic point group of $$3m^{\prime}$$ for the MM with a spontaneous magnetization parallel to the threefold rotational axis, the MPGE has four independent nonzero tensor components30: $${\beta }_{xxx}^{{{{{{{{{{{{\rm{m}}}}}}}}}}}}}=-{\beta }_{xyy}^{{{{{{{{{{{{\rm{m}}}}}}}}}}}}}=-{\beta }_{yxy}^{{{{{{{{{{{{\rm{m}}}}}}}}}}}}}=-{\beta }_{yyx}^{{{{{{{{{{{{\rm{m}}}}}}}}}}}}}\equiv {\beta }^{{{{{{{{{{{{\rm{m}}}}}}}}}}}}}$$, $${\beta }_{xyz}^{{{{{{{{{{{{\rm{m}}}}}}}}}}}}}=-{\beta }_{yxz}^{{{{{{{{{{{{\rm{m}}}}}}}}}}}}}$$, $${\beta }_{xzy}^{{{{{{{{{{{{\rm{m}}}}}}}}}}}}}=-{\beta }_{yzx}^{{{{{{{{{{{{\rm{m}}}}}}}}}}}}}$$, $${\beta }_{zxy}^{{{{{{{{{{{{\rm{m}}}}}}}}}}}}}=-{\beta }_{zyx}^{{{{{{{{{{{{\rm{m}}}}}}}}}}}}}$$. When a laser light $${{{{{{{{{{{\bf{E}}}}}}}}}}}}(\omega )={{{{{{{{{{{{\bf{E}}}}}}}}}}}}}_{0}{e}^{-i\left(kz-\omega t\right)}$$ propagating along the − z direction is irradiated on the MM at normal incidence (Fig. 1a), only βm contributes to the spin-driven photocurrents in the 2D plane of the MM. Under arbitrarily polarized light irradiation with $${{{{{{{{{{\bf{E}}}}}}}}}}}_{0}=\left({E}_{x},{E}_{y},{E}_{z}\right)=\left({{{{{{\rm{sin}}}}}}}\, {\theta }_{\omega }{{{{{{\rm{cos}}}}}}}\, {\varepsilon }_{\omega }-i\,{{{{{{\rm{cos}}}}}}}\, {\theta }_{\omega }{{{{{{\rm{sin}}}}}}}\, {\varepsilon }_{\omega },{{{{{{\rm{cos}}}}}}}\, {\theta }_{\omega } {{{{{{\rm{cos}}}}}}}\, {\varepsilon }_{\omega }+i\,{{{{{{\rm{sin}}}}}}}\, {\theta }_{\omega } {{{{{{\rm{sin}}}}}}}\, {\varepsilon }_{\omega },0\right)$$, spin-driven photocurrents are generated along the x and y directions as

$${J}_{{{{{{{{{{{{\rm{m}}}}}}}}}}}},x}={\beta }^{{{{{{{{{{{{\rm{m}}}}}}}}}}}}}\left({E}_{x}{E}_{x}^{*}-{E}_{y}{E}_{y}^{*}\right)=-{\beta }^{{{{{{{{{{{{\rm{m}}}}}}}}}}}}}{{{{{{{{\rm{cos}}}}}}}}}\, 2{\theta }_{\omega }{{{{{{{{\rm{cos}}}}}}}}}\, 2{\varepsilon }_{\omega },$$
(8)
$${J}_{{{{{{{{{{{{\rm{m}}}}}}}}}}}},y}=-{\beta }^{{{{{{{{{{{{\rm{m}}}}}}}}}}}}}\left({E}_{x}{E}_{y}^{*}+{E}_{y}{E}_{x}^{*}\right)=-{\beta }^{{{{{{{{{{{{\rm{m}}}}}}}}}}}}}{{{{{{{{\rm{sin}}}}}}}}}\; 2{\theta }_{\omega }{{{{{{{{\rm{cos}}}}}}}}}\; 2{\varepsilon }_{\omega }.$$
(9)

From these expressions, we get

$$|{{{{{{{{{{{{\bf{\,J}}}}}}}}}}}}}_{{{{{{{{{{{{\rm{m}}}}}}}}}}}}} |=\sqrt{{\left(\,{J}_{{{{{{{{{{{{\rm{m}}}}}}}}}}}},x}\right)}^{2}+{\left(\,{J}_{{{{{{{{{{{{\rm{m}}}}}}}}}}}},y}\right)}^{2}}=\left|{\beta }^{{{{{{{{{{{{\rm{m}}}}}}}}}}}}}\right|{{{{{{{{\rm{cos}}}}}}}}}\, 2{\varepsilon }_{\omega }\qquad (-4{5}^{\circ }\le {\varepsilon }_{\omega }\le 4{5}^{\circ }),$$
(10)

and

$${\theta }_{{{{{{{{{{{{\rm{m}}}}}}}}}}}}}=\left\{\begin{array}{ll}-2{\theta }_{\omega }\mp 9{0}^{\circ }\qquad \quad &({\beta }^{{{{{{{{{{{{\rm{m}}}}}}}}}}}}} \, > \, 0)\\ -2{\theta }_{\omega }\pm 9{0}^{\circ }\qquad \quad &({\beta }^{{{{{{{{{{{{\rm{m}}}}}}}}}}}}} \, < \, 0)\end{array}\right.,$$
(11)

where  and ± in Eq. (11) depends on the magnetization direction ± Mz. Equations (10) and (11) imply that Jm and θm of the spin-driven photocurrents can be independently controlled by εω and θω of the excitation light, respectively, and that θm flips when Mz reverses. Thus, the polarization information of an arbitrarily polarized light can be converted into the magnitude and flow direction of the spin-driven photocurrents. These relations are purely determined by the artificially built-in symmetry of the MM and are not restricted to specific material properties or excitation wavelength31, thus allowing broad-band operation (see Supplementary Fig. 6). The conventional (nonmagnetic) photogalvanic effect is discussed in Supplementary Figs. 3, 4, 6 and Supplementary Discussion.