Correction to: Nature Communications https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-022-30098-w, published online 11 May 2022

“The original version of this Article contained an error in Fig. 5, in which the figure was inadvertently replaced with an earlier version containing incorrect AFG values. The correct version of Fig. 5 is:

which replaces the previous incorrect version:

This has been corrected in both the PDF and HTML versions of the Article.”