Abstract
The B-family multi-subunit DNA polymerase ζ (Polζ) is important for translesion DNA synthesis (TLS) during replication, due to its ability to extend synthesis past nucleotides opposite DNA lesions and mismatched base pairs. We present a cryo-EM structure of Saccharomyces cerevisiae Polζ with an A:C mismatch at the primer terminus. The structure shows how the Polζ active site responds to the mismatched duplex DNA distortion, including the loosening of key protein-DNA interactions and a fingers domain in an “open” conformation, while the incoming dCTP is still able to bind for the extension reaction. The structure of the mismatched DNA-Polζ ternary complex reveals insights into mechanisms that either stall or favor continued DNA synthesis in eukaryotes.
Similar content being viewed by others
Introduction
Assembled from catalytic Rev3 and accessory Rev7, Pol31, and Pol32 subunits, the translesion DNA synthesis (TLS) polymerase ζ (Polζ) plays an important role in the replication of damaged or mismatched DNA in eukaryotic cells1,2,3,4, and in the prevention of cancer5,6. We recently reported the cryo-EM structures of S.cerevisiae Polζ holoenzyme without DNA (4.1 Å) and in the act of DNA synthesis (3.1 Å)7. The structures decrypt a pentameric ring-like architecture for Polζ, with the catalytic Rev3 and the accessory Pol31, Pol32, and two Rev7 subunits (Rev7A and Rev7B) forming a daisy chain of protein-protein interactions7. Rev3 makes contacts to the DNA via its palm, fingers, thumb, exonuclease, and N-terminal (NTD) domains. While in apo Polζ the Rev3 fingers domain adopts an “open” conformation, in the matched DNA bound form it lies flush against the nascent base pair in a “closed” conformation and provides a basis for Polζ’s high fidelity during the nucleotide insertion step7. The ability of Polζ to tolerate mismatches and lesions at the primer terminus appears to derive in part from the path divergence of the linker between the NTD and the palm, which creates space to better accommodate deviations from Watson-Crick (W-C) base pair geometry7.
We present here, at a nominal resolution of 3.05 Å, a cryo-EM structure of Polζ with an A:C mismatch at the primer terminus (Fig. 1). The structure of the mismatched DNA-Polζ ternary complex provides a basis for understanding what makes Polζ more adept than other eukaryotic B-family DNA polymerases at extending DNA synthesis past mismatched base pairs.
Results and discussion
Structure of the mismatched DNA-Polζ ternary complex
The Rev3, Rev7A, Rev7B, Pol31, and Pol32 subunits are organized around the mismatched duplex DNA in the same pentameric ring-like architecture as the matched complex (Fig. 1), with catalytic Rev3 alone making all of the contacts to the DNA. Rev3 embraces the mismatched template-primer with its palm (residues 329–373; 941–1043; 1098–1215), fingers (residues 302–328; 1044–1097), thumb (residues 1216–1372), inactive exonuclease (residues 662–894) domains, and the NTD (residues 1-301, 374–400, 895–940). The palm, thumb, and the exonuclease domains, as well as the NTD, occupy positions that are essentially identical to those observed with the matched DNA7 (Fig. 1). That is, the palm interacts with the replicative end of the template-primer and carries the active site residues (Asp975 and Asp1144), the thumb grips the duplex portion of the primer-template and makes contacts through the minor groove, the inactive exonuclease domain extends towards the major groove, and the NTD makes numerous contacts with the unpaired portion of the template strand. However, unlike the matched DNA-Polζ ternary complex, the fingers domain of Polζ on the mismatched template adopts an open conformation8, wherein the fingers helices αF, αxA and αxB rotate outwards by ~15° from the palm domain (Fig. 1), reminiscent of their position in the Polζ apo structure7 (Supplementary Fig. 1). Interestingly, the fingers helices are less defined in the cryo-EM density compared to the matched complex (Supplementary Fig. 2a), suggesting motion around the open conformation. The replicative end of the mismatched DNA is also less defined in cryo-EM density than the matched complex (Supplementary Fig. 2b), indicating an increase in motion throughout the Polζ active site when containing a mismatch at the primer terminus.
Polζ active site response to the mismatched DNA
Intriguingly, even though the fingers domain is open to the same extent as in the apo Polζ structure7 (Supplementary Fig. 1), Rev3 is observed with the incoming nucleotide dCTP (position P0) opposite the templating base G (position T0), establishing standard W-C base pairing for the nascent base pair (Fig. 2a and Supplementary Fig. 3). The dCTP triphosphate moiety treks between the fingers and palm domains, but many of the contacts observed in the matched complex with the fingers helices are lost; including, for example, hydrogen bonds between Lys1086 and Arg1057 and the α− and γ-phosphates of dCTP, respectively (Fig. 2a, b). The dCTP is anchored loosely in the active site by inter-base hydrogen bonds with templating G, and by the contact it maintains with the palm domain, including stacking interactions between its sugar and Tyr980, and hydrogen bonds between its β- and γ-phosphates and the main chain amides of Leu979 and Ser978, respectively. Of the two metals “A” and “B” observed in the active site of the matched complex7 and associated with a two-metal ion mechanism of catalysis9,10, only metal B, a Ca2+ ion, appears to be coordinated to the dCTP triphosphate moiety (Fig. 2a, b). The absence of metal A likely reflects the overall openness and mobility of the Rev3 active site when accommodating a mismatch at the primer terminus.
An open fingers domain creates space above the nascent G:C base pair and many of the van der Waals contacts observed in the matched complex are lost, including those from Leu1087 and Val1091 of the fingers helix αxB (Fig. 2a, b). But, despite the open conformation of the fingers domain, Tyr1093 and Gly1094 from helix αxB continue to impinge on the minor groove side of the nascent base pair and provide a basis for some fidelity for W-C base pairing at the insertion position (Fig. 2a).
Amongst the various hydrogen bonding schemes that have been considered for an A:C mismatch within a DNA duplex, the DNA cryo-EM density we observe is most consistent with a “wobble” base pairing, in which the N6 and N1 atoms of adenine make putative hydrogen bonds with N3 and O2 atoms of cytosine, respectively (Fig. 2c, d). This would be the same configuration described by Kennard and co-workers11 for an A:C mismatch in a DNA duplex, implying protonation of N1 of adenine. For the wobble pairing, the cytosine base shifts towards the major groove by ~1.2 Å, and the A:C base pair as a whole is much more propeller twisted (−17.8°) than the G:C base pair (−3.8°) in the matched complex (Fig. 2d). The increase in propeller twist (and buckling) extends to the neighboring base pairs, including the nascent base pair. These small perturbations in the conformation of the mismatched DNA duplex appear to hamper the ability of the Rev3 fingers domain to adopt the closed conformation observed in the matched DNA-Polζ ternary complex7.
The active site geometry is less primed for the nucleotidyl transfer reaction than in the matched complex. In particular, the A:C wobble pairing results in a shift in the cytidine sugar, which displaces the putative primer 3′OH by ~ 1.2 Å from its position in the matched DNA-Polζ ternary complex7 and increases the distance from ~3.8 Å to 4.4 Å to the dCTP α-phosphorous atom - making it less amenable for a nucleophilic attack (Fig. 2e). This increase in distance and the absence of catalytic metal A in the active site may explain the ~20-fold reduction in the ability of Polζ to extend DNA synthesis from mismatched A:C versus matched A:T at the primer terminus12.
What makes Polζ a better extender of DNA synthesis past mismatched base pairs than other eukaryotic B-family polymerases?
It is likely that the overall mobility we observe at the primer terminus (Supplementary Fig. 2), while limiting the rate of catalysis on the one hand, may also facilitate the sampling of catalytically competent conformers for the nucleotidyl transfer reaction. Polζ is also notably different from most B-family polymerases in lacking proofreading exonuclease activity2,3,4, attributed to the absence of catalytic carboxylates in the Rev3 exonuclease domain and by the near absence of a β-hairpin substructure7 (Supplementary Fig. 4). The β-hairpin in these B-family polymerase exonuclease domains is postulated to facilitate the transfer of a mismatched primer from the polymerase to exonuclease active site13,14, and its near absence in Rev3 may preferably partition the mismatched primer in the polymerase active site for the extension reaction. The mobility of the primer terminus and the near absence of the β-hairpin may combine to lend Polζ the ability to better extend synthesis from mismatched base pairs compared to Polδ or Polε. This is likely coupled to the path divergence of the NTD-palm linker in Polζ, creating extra space for DNA lesions and mismatches7. It is striking that despite the DNA distortion from the A:C mismatch and the open fingers domain, the incoming dCTP is still able to bind the Rev3 active site, with its triphosphate moiety oriented in the same manner as in the matched complex (Fig. 2a). Whether the fingers domain remains open or transiently closes during the covalent addition of a nucleotide from a mismatch is an intriguing question that remains to be answered. In either case, the binding/entry of metal A would be a prerequisite for activation of the primer 3’OH for the nucleotidyl transfer reaction. Curiously, an open fingers domain has also been observed in the structure of the human Polα catalytic domain in complex with a DNA duplex and dCTP, and suggested as one reason for the lower fidelity of Polα in incorporating nucleotides after the first dNTP15.
It has proven difficult indeed to capture structures of ternary complexes between wild-type B-family DNA polymerases and mismatched duplex DNA. By contrast, the A-family DNA polymerase from B.stearothermophilus has been characterized with numerous mismatches, revealing DNA distortions that extend up to six base pairs from the primer terminus16. The available structures of replicative B-family polymerase from bacteriophage RB69 with DNA mismatches, for example, have been largely derived with a quadruple mutant of the enzyme designed specifically for low base selectivity17. The structure presented here constitutes an early example of how the advent of cryo-EM methods offers unprecedented opportunities to capture and compare B-family polymerases with mismatches for a fuller understanding of the mechanisms that either stall or favor continued DNA synthesis.
Methods
Protein expression and purification
Saccharomyces cerevisiae Polζ holoenzyme, composed of the full-length Rev3 (residues 1–1,504), Rev7 (residues 1–245), Pol31 (residues 1–487), and Pol32 (residues 1–350) subunits, was expressed in yeast from plasmids pBJ1462 and pBJ1524 and purified as described7,18. The complex with the mismatched duplex DNA was prepared by incubating the Polζ holoenzyme in a CaCl2 supplemented buffer with an HPLC purified (Integrated DNA technologies) palindromic DNA (in 1.5 molar excess), yielding an A:C mismatch at the extension (T1) position (5′-TAATGATAGGGGAGGGAATCCCTCCCCTACdd-3) and G as the templating base. Incoming dCTP was added (1 mM) to capture of Polζ in the act of DNA synthesis past an A:C mismatch.
Cryo-EM specimen preparation
Specimen preparation for Polζ holoenzyme with the mismatched DNA was done on 300-mesh gold-coated quantifoil grids of 1.2 μm hole size and 1.3 μm spacing. The grids were plasma cleaned using Ar and O2 for 8 s using a solarus plasma cleaner (Gatan) prior to loading 2.5 μl of the sample. Back blotting followed by vitrification in liquid ethane was performed with a Leica EM GP2 plunge freezer (Leica microsystems).
Cryo-EM data collection
The mismatched DNA-Polζ ternary complex was imaged on a Titan Krios microscope (Thermo Fisher Scientific) operated at 300 kV and equipped with a K2 direct electron detector (Gatan) operating in super-resolution mode at a calibrated pixel size of 0.548 Å. The data were subsequently binned by 2 during frame alignment to yield a pixel size of 1.096 Å. Movies were recorded at a frame rate of 200 ms for 10 s for a total accumulated dose of 64.82 e–/Å2. A nominal defocus range of 0.5–2.5 μm was employed, and the movies were automatically acquired using Leginon to control both the microscope and the K2 camera19,20. Frames were aligned using MotionCor2 with dose weighting21 and the contrast transfer function (CTF) estimation was performed with CTFFIND422. A total of 2279 images were collected over two sessions and processed to obtain the final three-dimensional (3D) reconstruction (Table 1).
Cryo-EM data processing
Particle picking for the mismatch complex was done with FindEM in Appion23 using reprojections from the negative-stain reconstruction of Polζ24. Particles picked were subjected to multiple rounds of two-dimensional (2D) classification in cryoSPARC225. Selected Polζ particles from about half of the micrographs (Session 1: 1008) were used to obtain a 3D reconstruction with a sphericity of 0.90 out of 1. The other half of the data (Session 2: 1171) was trained with topaz, a neural network-based particle picker26 implemented within cryoSPARC2. The micrographs were binned by four and used with resnet8 neural-network architecture. Pi, the expected fraction of positive pixels, was set to 0.027, and the radius parameter, which sets the number of pixels around a labeled particle coordinate, was set to 3. A total of 200 iterations were used to fit the topaz model.
Selected particles from both sessions were combined and iterative rounds of 2D classification were performed. A final set of 210,505 particles was subjected to ab-initio clean-up in cryoSPARC2, which allowed the removal of low-resolution models with preferred orientation. The ab-initio model was refined using non-uniform refinement to generate a 3D reconstruction at a nominal resolution of 3.1 Å based on the Fourier shell correlation (FSC) value of 0.143 between independently refined half sets27,28. The cryo-EM map was checked for directional anisotropy (https://3dfsc.salk.edu) and gave a value of 0.967 out of 1. The particles in this reconstruction were subjected to local CTF refinement followed by local refinement within cryoSPARC2, which lead to a 3D reconstruction with an FSC0.143 value of 3.05 Å (Table 1 and Supplementary Fig. 5).
Model building and refinement
Model building was performed in COOT29 using the matched DNA-Polζ ternary complex as the initial model (PDB ID: 6V93). The 3D reconstruction was subjected to local map sharpening using the fitted model coordinates in locscale (ccpem)30,31 to improve the contrast of the cryo-EM density, especially in the flexible regions of the map. The model was refined by multiple rounds of real-space refinement in Phenix32 using the locscale sharpened map. The model was validated using Molprobity33 and the data was analyzed in Chimera34. The figures were prepared in Pymol35.
Reporting summary
Further information on research design is available in the Nature Research Reporting Summary linked to this article.
Data availability
The data that support this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request. The cryo-EM density map generated in this study has been deposited in the Electron Microscopy Data Bank (EMDB) under accession number EMD-24793. The resulting atomic coordinates have been deposited in the Protein Data Bank (PDB) with accession number 7S0T. The atomic coordinates used in the study are available in the PDB with accession numbers 6V93 and 6V8P.
References
Prakash, S., Johnson, R. E. & Prakash, L. Eukaryotic translesion synthesis DNA polymerases: specificity of structure and function. Annu Rev. Biochem. 74, 317–353 (2005).
Jain, R., Aggarwal, A. K. & Rechkoblit, O. Eukaryotic DNA polymerases. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 53, 77–87 (2018).
Makarova, A. V. & Burgers, P. M. Eukaryotic DNA polymerase zeta. DNA Repair 29, 47–55 (2015).
Martin, S. K. & Wood, R. D. DNA polymerase zeta in DNA replication and repair. Nucleic Acids Res. 47, 8348–8361 (2019).
Lange, S. S., Takata, K. & Wood, R. D. DNA polymerases and cancer. Nat. Rev. Cancer 11, 96–110 (2011).
Sharma, S., Helchowski, C. M. & Canman, C. E. The roles of DNA polymerase zeta and the Y family DNA polymerases in promoting or preventing genome instability. Mutat. Res. 743-744, 97–110 (2013).
Malik, R. et al. Structure and mechanism of B-family DNA polymerase zeta specialized for translesion DNA synthesis. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 27, 913–924 (2020).
Doublie, S., Sawaya, M. R. & Ellenberger, T. An open and closed case for all polymerases. Structure 7, R31–R35 (1999).
Steitz, T. A. & Steitz, J. A. A general two-metal-ion mechanism for catalytic RNA. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 90, 6498–6502 (1993).
Steitz, T. A. DNA polymerases: structural diversity and common mechanisms. J. Biol. Chem. 274, 17395–17398 (1999).
Hunter, W. N., Brown, T., Anand, N. N. & Kennard, O. Structure of an adenine-cytosine base pair in DNA and its implications for mismatch repair. Nature 320, 552–555 (1986).
Johnson, R. E., Washington, M. T., Haracska, L., Prakash, S. & Prakash, L. Eukaryotic polymerases iota and zeta act sequentially to bypass DNA lesions. Nature 406, 1015–1019 (2000).
Hogg, M., Aller, P., Konigsberg, W., Wallace, S. S. & Doublie, S. Structural and biochemical investigation of the role in proofreading of a beta hairpin loop found in the exonuclease domain of a replicative DNA polymerase of the B family. J. Biol. Chem. 282, 1432–1444 (2007).
Stocki, S. A., Nonay, R. L. & Reha-Krantz, L. J. Dynamics of bacteriophage T4 DNA polymerase function: identification of amino acid residues that affect switching between polymerase and 3’–> 5’ exonuclease activities. J. Mol. Biol. 254, 15–28 (1995).
Baranovskiy, A. G. et al. Activity and fidelity of human DNA polymerase alpha depend on primer structure. J. Biol. Chem. 293, 6824–6843 (2018).
Johnson, S. J. & Beese, L. S. Structures of mismatch replication errors observed in a DNA polymerase. Cell 116, 803–816 (2004).
Xia, S. & Konigsberg, W. H. RB69 DNA polymerase structure, kinetics, and fidelity. Biochemistry 53, 2752–2767 (2014).
Johnson, R. E., Prakash, L. & Prakash, S. Pol31 and Pol32 subunits of yeast DNA polymerase delta are also essential subunits of DNA polymerase zeta. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 109, 12455–12460 (2012).
Lander, G. C. et al. Appion: an integrated, database-driven pipeline to facilitate EM image processing. J. Struct. Biol. 166, 95–102 (2009).
Suloway, C. et al. Automated molecular microscopy: the new Leginon system. J. Struct. Biol. 151, 41–60 (2005).
Zheng, S. Q. et al. MotionCor2: anisotropic correction of beam-induced motion for improved cryo-electron microscopy. Nat. Methods 14, 331–332 (2017).
Rohou, A. & Grigorieff, N. CTFFIND4: Fast and accurate defocus estimation from electron micrographs. J. Struct. Biol. 192, 216–221 (2015).
Roseman, A. M. FindEM - a fast, efficient program for automatic selection of particles from electron micrographs. J. Struct. Biol. 145, 91–99 (2004).
Gomez-Llorente, Y. et al. The Architecture of Yeast DNA Polymerase zeta. Cell Rep. 5, 79–86 (2013).
Punjani, A., Rubinstein, J. L., Fleet, D. J. & Brubaker, M. A. cryoSPARC: algorithms for rapid unsupervised cryo-EM structure determination. Nat. Methods 14, 290 (2017).
Bepler, T. et al. Positive-unlabeled convolutional neural networks for particle picking in cryo-electron micrographs. Nat. Methods https://doi.org/10.1038/s41592-019-0575-8 (2019).
Scheres, S. H. W. & Chen, S. X. Prevention of overfitting in cryo-EM structure determination. Nat. Methods 9, 853–854 (2012).
Rosenthal, P. B. & Henderson, R. Optimal determination of particle orientation, absolute hand, and contrast loss in single-particle electron cryomicroscopy. J. Mol. Biol. 333, 721–745 (2003).
Emsley, P. & Cowtan, K. Coot: model-building tools for molecular graphics. Acta Crystallogr. D Biol. Crystallogr. 60, 2126–2132 (2004).
Burnley, T., Palmer, C. M. & Winn, M. Recent developments in the CCP-EM software suite. Acta Crystallogr. D Struct. Biol. 73, 469–477 (2017).
Jakobi, A. J., Wilmanns, M. & Sachse, C. Model-based local density sharpening of cryo-EM maps. Elife https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.27131 (2017).
Adams, P. D. et al. PHENIX: a comprehensive Python-based system for macromolecular structure solution. Acta Crystallogr. D Biol. Crystallogr. 66, 213–221 (2010).
Chen, V. B. et al. MolProbity: all-atom structure validation for macromolecular crystallography. Acta Crystallogr. D 66, 12–21 (2010).
Pettersen, E. F. et al. UCSF Chimera–a visualization system for exploratory research and analysis. J. Comput. Chem. 25, 1605–1612 (2004).
DeLano, W. L. & Lam, J. W. PyMOL: a communications tool for computational models. Abstr. Pap. Am. Chem. Soc. 230, U1371–U1372 (2005).
Acknowledgements
This work was funded by grants R01-GM124047 (A.K.A and L.P) and R35-GM13170 (A.K.A) from the National Institutes of Health (NIH). I.U.-B was supported by a grant PID2019-104423GB-I00/AEI/10.13039/501100011033 from the Spanish State Research Agency and by the Basque Excellence Research Centre program. Most of the cryo-EM work was performed at the Simons Electron Microscopy Center and National Resource for Automated Molecular Microscopy, located at the New York Structural Biology Center, supported by grants from the Simons Foundation (SF349247), NYSTAR, and the NIH National Institute of General Medical Sciences (GM103310), with additional support from Agouron Institute (F00316), NIH (OD019994) and NIH (RR029300). Computing resources needed for this work were provided in part by the High Performance Computing facility of the Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai. Molecular graphics and analyses were performed with UCSF Chimera, developed by the Resource for Biocomputing, Visualization, and Informatics at the University of California, San Francisco, with support from NIH P41-GM103311.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
A.K.A and R.M. designed the experiments. R. E. J. expressed Polζ in yeast. R.M. purified Polζ and optimized grid preparation for cryo-EM studies. R.M. collected and processed the cryo-EM data. R.M. built and refined the atomic model. A.K.A. and I.U.-B guided the overall project. S.P. and L.P. guided the protein expression studies. A.K.A. and R.M. and I.U.-B prepared the manuscript with input from all authors.
Corresponding authors
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Peer review
Peer review information
Nature Communications thanks Yoshizumi Ishino and the other anonymous reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review this work.
Additional information
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary information
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Malik, R., Johnson, R.E., Prakash, L. et al. Cryo-EM structure of translesion DNA synthesis polymerase ζ with a base pair mismatch. Nat Commun 13, 1050 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-022-28644-7
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-022-28644-7
This article is cited by
-
Cryo-EM structure of the Rev1–Polζ holocomplex reveals the mechanism of their cooperativity in translesion DNA synthesis
Nature Structural & Molecular Biology (2024)
-
Exploring the diverse biomedical applications of programmable and multifunctional DNA nanomaterials
Journal of Nanobiotechnology (2023)
Comments
By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.