Abstract
Magnetic reconnection is a multi-faceted process of energy conversion in astrophysical, space and laboratory plasmas that operates at microscopic scales but has macroscopic drivers and consequences. Solar flares present a key laboratory for its study, leaving imprints of the microscopic physics in radiation spectra and allowing the macroscopic evolution to be imaged, yet a full observational characterization remains elusive. Here we combine high resolution imaging and spectral observations of a confined solar flare at multiple wavelengths with data-constrained magnetohydrodynamic modeling to study the dynamics of the flare plasma from the current sheet to the plasmoid scale. The analysis suggests that the flare resulted from the interaction of a twisted magnetic flux rope surrounding a filament with nearby magnetic loops whose feet are anchored in chromospheric fibrils. Bright cusp-shaped structures represent the region around a reconnecting separator or quasi-separator (hyperbolic flux tube). The fast reconnection, which is relevant for other astrophysical environments, revealed plasmoids in the current sheet and separatrices and associated unresolved turbulent motions.
Similar content being viewed by others
Introduction
Solar flares result from the most dramatic events of energy release by magnetic reconnection on the Sun and provide a broad range of observational detail about this fundamental process1,2,3. In the standard flare model for eruptive events4,5,6,7, magnetic reconnection is initiated in a vertical current sheet spawned on the underside of an erupting flux rope which is associated with a coronal mass ejection (CME). Rising arcades of reconnected hot, initially cusp-shaped magnetic loops (flare loops), rooted in a pair of bright flare ribbons, are formed in the downward reconnection outflow. Confined flares result when the erupting flux is impeded by strong overlying flux or when neighboring flux systems are pressed against each other, and a reconnecting current sheet is formed at the interface8,9,10. A filament extending along the polarity inversion line of the source region often traces the activated flux. These large-scale geometries of a reconnecting current sheet, its drivers and its consequences are well established11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20.
High-resolution imaging observations provide rich information about details of the reconnection process which result from its internal dynamics, especially the formation of plasmoids21,22 and turbulent structures23, and from the complexity and three-dimensional (3D) nature of the solar magnetic field24,25. Spectral and multi-wavelength data reveal aspects of the microscopic processes, e.g., particle acceleration26,27, the nonthermal-thermal energy partition28, the plasmoid instability29,30, and bursty31 or turbulent reconnection32,33, in addition to flows34. Finally, besides hot flare plasmas, the Sun also allows the reconnection of cool chromospheric structures to be studied24,35. However, despite this broad range of information, comprehensive simultaneous imaging and spectral observations are still limited. In particular, while individual components of the reconnection in- and outflows have often been observed15,18,21,34,36,37, we are aware of only two events revealing all four flows19,35 but these have no or only limited spectral information about the involved plasma, a limitation that has prevented the mode of reconnection, i.e. Petschek-like12, plasmoid-mediated29, collisionless38, turbulent39 or other possible modes40, from being inferred.
Here we present multi-wavelength imaging and spectral evidence for magnetic reconnection in a strong confined solar flare, traced by the cool plasma of the interacting filament and chromospheric fibrils and associated with by emerging flux. The flare is unique in that it displayed all four reconnection in- and outflows, with plasmoids in the current sheet and the separatrices. These were fully covered by spectroscopic observations, and yielded the hard X-ray images from a current sheet on the solar disk. This allows us to measure both inflows and outflows and to infer the mode of reconnection from the analysis of the physical conditions in the current sheet. We also perform a state-of-the-art, data-constrained numerical simulation of the reconnection event, which supports our interpretation of the observational data.
Results
High-resolution imaging of the reconnection flows
The flare of magnitude M2.2 (of 1–8 Å flux 2.2 × 10−5 Wm−2) occurred in Active Region NOAA (National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration) 11967 at S13E04 (S denotes latitude; E denotes longitude) on 2014 February 2, starting at 07:17 UT, peaking at 08:20 UT, and ending at 08:29 UT. This was a large active region with a βγδ sunspot configuration41. Several of its main flux components were already decaying, but there was also new flux emerging into the region. Driven by these changes, many C- and M-class flares were produced during its passage across the solar disk42,43.
Figure 1a shows an Hα image (acquired at center wavelength of 6562.8 Å) of the X-shaped flaring region from the New Vacuum Solar Telescope (NVST)44 superimposed with magnetic flux contours from the Solar Dynamics Observatory (SDO)/Helioseismic and Magnetic Imager (HMI)45 magnetogram in Fig. 1b. Using nonlinear force-free field (NLFFF) extrapolation of the photospheric vector magnetogram from SDO/HMI at 07:36 UT (see Methods, subsection NLFFF extrapolation), we obtain the relevant magnetic structures prior to the onset of the reconnection event. The yellow-colored field lines in Fig. 1b and corresponding dotted yellow path in Fig. 1a on the west (right) side of the flaring region coincide with the filament involved in the subsequent reconnection. The field lines clearly reveal the structure of a twisted flux rope46, which is consistent with the NVST observations. The threads of the filament intertwined with one another along the filament spine (see Supplementary Fig. 1). According to the NLFFF, the flux rope has a larger cross section of ~10 Mm diameter, extending over a height range of z ~ 5–15 Mm at the x–y position where the reconnection is observed (Supplementary Figs. 2 and 3). Note that the Z-axis of Supplementary Figs. 2 and 3 denotes the height perpendicular to the x–y plane. The pink-colored field lines and corresponding path trace a set of magnetic loops on the east (left) side. Their northern part follows chromospheric fibrils but they extend to coronal heights, so are only rooted in the fibrils. These flux systems run close to each other and nearly antiparallel, suggesting the formation of a current sheet between them, in a height range z ~ 5–15 Mm.
An episode of magnetic reconnection, which clearly involves the filament, is displayed in Fig. 1c–h and the related Supplementary Movie 1, using Hα images from the NVST. The white arrows (the longer arrows) indicate a thread of the filament that moves into the reconnection region, reconnects across the current sheet to form a new thread in the north outflow region (blue arrows, shorter arrows), and finally moves away from the reconnection region. Since filaments are structures suspended in the corona, the reconnection must proceed at coronal heights. The cool Hα-absorbing material of the filament threads turns into emission in the coronal current sheet and cusps as a result of the heating by this local reconnection.
Figure 2 compares the imaging of the reconnection process between Hα and the extreme ultraviolet (EUV) and UV observations from the SDO/Atmospheric Imaging Assembly (AIA)47. The associated Supplementary Movie 2 shows an animation of these data and the additional AIA 94, 193, 211, and 335 Å channels. The white arrows in Fig. 2a point out the filament (dotted yellow line) and loop system (dotted pink line) which approached each other and began to reconnect. A bright linear structure formed between them and is continuously seen in the Hα images during 08:05–08:10 UT (blue arrows in Fig. 2f, k and Supplementary Movie 1). This is co-spatial with a nearly vertical current sheet in our data-constrained magnetohydrodynamic (MHD) modeling (see Results, subsection MHD simulation). Cusp-shaped brightened areas with newly formed threads (black arrows in Fig. 2f) extend from both ends of the linear structure. The filament is also imaged by the AIA 304 and 171 Å data (Fig. 2b, c), and the bright current sheet with cusps (yellow arrow in Fig. 2l) is seen at the same position also in all AIA wavebands, albeit with much less detail due to their lower resolution and saturation of the brightest parts (see Results, subsection Plasmoids); The bright structure indicated by the yellow arrow in Fig. 2l is not a classical Hα ribbon. It is caused by reconnection in the coronal part of the current sheet that heats the plasma in the current sheet and its attached cusps, which themselves become bright in EUV/UV and Hα, and this reconnection also provides the energy required for the other emissions.
Since the Hα images are not saturated in intensity, they reveal substantial detail of the flaring region. In particular, thread-like bright structures appear from 08:07:20 UT throughout the flare phase (up to 08:24:17 UT; also see Supplementary Movie 1). Their rapid changes from frame to frame clearly indicate structures in the coronal reconnection region, with heated filament threads being the most likely origin. During ~08:13–08:20 UT, which includes the impulsive flare phase (~08:17–08:20 UT), there is a prominent decrease of the Hα absorption in the whole area of the current sheet and cusps, suggesting they are products of heating in the separatrices or quasi-separatrix layers (QSLs) that branch off from the reconnecting current sheet and enclose the cusps40. This appears as a brightening very similar in shape to the EUV brightening when the display of the Hα data is artificially saturated.
Additionally, the Hα images show stationary brightenings that appear as extensions from the cusps in projection (contours in Fig. 2p–t and cyan arrows in Fig. 2q). These form where the QSLs, which extend from the current sheet in the MHD model, intersect the magnetogram plane at somewhat remote locations from the current sheet and cusps. From their essentially linear shape and stationarity and from their magnetic connection to the current sheet in the corona (detailed in Supplementary Fig. 4), we interpret these brightenings as classical chromospheric flare ribbons (see the cyan arrows in Fig. 2q), which are fed by the energy release in the coronal reconnecting current sheet. The 3D field lines in the MHD model at t = 42 s show that the coronal current sheet in the range of significant reconnection (z ~ 3–15 Mm, cyan to red colors) is magnetically connected to the observed chromospheric flare ribbons as seen in Hα at 08:09:21 UT (see Supplementary Fig. 4). As usual, cospatial ribbons are seen in all EUV/UV channels that image plasma at coronal temperatures, and the agreement with Hα is best at 1600 Å. Overall, both Hα and the EUV/UV images show, consistently with each other, a superposition of the coronal reconnection volume (reconnecting current sheet and cusps) and chromospheric flare ribbons.
Finally, the AIA 131 Å images in the fourth column of Fig. 2 show the plasma heated to typical flare temperatures of ~10 MK. During the flare (Fig. 2d, i, n), this plasma outlines the X-shaped structure of the current sheet, cusps, and its adjacent separatrices, fully consistent with the Hα and lower-temperature EUV structure. The point at the tip of the cusps represents in 3D a separator or quasi-separator line at which two pairs of separatrices or quasi-separatrices intersect or touch. Figure 2s shows three sets of flare loops. Two sets connect the flare ribbons in the area of the points E, F, and G in Fig. 2p, suggesting they are products of heating in the QSLs. The third set is slightly westward displaced from the reconnection region and has a different origin: in addition to the long-lasting reconnection process, a partial, confined eruption of the filament occurs during the impulsive flare phase. Unfortunately, the eruption is not traced by the Hα data which image only the coolest parts of the filament that do not participate in the eruption. However, the draining of filament material after the eruption is obvious in Hα, due to the strong cooling of the material (Supplementary Movie 1). The eruption can be seen in the AIA 171 and 304 Å data (Supplementary Movie 2), but is considerably masked by detector saturation, so that the onset time cannot be determined unambigously. An onset between 08:14 UT and 08:17 UT appears likely. The Hα movie shows that the erupted part of the filament finds its final position around 08:32 UT and is then similar in shape to the third set of hot flare loops seen in the 131 Å channel. Both their southern footpoint area seen in Supplementary Movie 2 and their northern footpoint area (outside the field of view of the animation) coincide with the filament footpoints. Both branches of the filament (the remaining and the erupted but halted one), as well as the draining of the halted filament toward its southern footpoint are clearly seen in Supplementary Movies 1 and 2. It is clear also from this part of the event that Hα and the EUV (304 and 171 Å) show one and the same filament and provide consistent information about its evolution.
The partial eruption of the filament is a process separate from the reconnection studied here. This can also be seen from the GOES soft X-ray light curve in Fig. 3a and the Reuven Ramaty High-Energy Solar Spectroscopic Imager (RHESSI)48 X-ray counts in the 3–6, 6–12, 12–25, and 25–50 keV bands in Fig. 3b, which show a short impulsive flare phase simultaneous with the partial filament eruption (~08:17–08:20 UT) superimposed on the long-lasting slow-rise phase dominated by the reconnection analyzed here. This phase reaches the GOES level M1.2.
The Hα data allow us to measure the projected reconnection in- and outflow velocities using time-slices of the intensity along the artificial slits A-B and C-D in Fig. 2p. Up to 08:14 UT, the inflows are found to be vi = 0.06 km s−1 on the east (left) side and vi = 0.05 km s−1 on the west (right) side (see the cyan lines in Fig. 3c). Here we have assumed that the inflow velocity of the loops on the east (left) side into the coronal current sheet is of the same magnitude as the velocity of the chromospheric fibrils in which the loops are rooted. The outflows are measured from vo = 2.0 to 3.7 km s−1 in southward direction, which is presumably downward, and vo = 3.4 to 3.8 km s−1 in northward direction, which is presumably upward; see the cyan lines in Fig. 3d. The resulting reconnection rate M = vi/vo = 0.01–0.03, which clearly indicates a fast reconnection process. We also measure the outflows along the cusp lines (magnetic separatrices) attached to the ends of the current sheet (see the curved lines E-F and G-H in Fig. 2p). These are found to lie in the ranges 2.3–5.5 km s−1 (pink lines) and 0.8–2.6 km s−1 (cyan line) for the south and north cusp lines, respectively (see Fig. 3e, f). As the reconnection continues, an unusual feature of the event is that the chromospheric fibrils and the main body of the filament began to separate from the reconnection region after 08:14 UT with velocities of 0.98 and 0.39 km s−1 on the east (left) and west (right) sides, respectively (see Fig. 3c), whereas some of the filament threads still participated in the reconnection process. This is considered further in the Discussion. Note that the y-axis denotes the direction information in the time-distance maps of Fig. 3c, d, e, and f.
EUV spectroscopy of reconnection flows and turbulence
The Hinode/EUV Imaging Spectrometer (EIS)49 observations covered essentially the whole reconnection event. Figure 4 shows the intensity (a–c), Doppler velocity (d–f), and non-thermal velocity (g–i). There is a strong red shift in the southern cusp-shaped structure, with the maximum Doppler velocity reaching about 80 km s−1, and blue shift in the northern cusp reaching about 40 km s−1. Although the blue shift is weaker and far less extended, it represents a definite measurement in the raster at 08:12:43 UT (Fig. 4f) because it is of uniform sign in a contiguous range of pixels (each pixel represents an independent spectral fitting) with a magnitude much larger than the noise level (estimated to be 3 km s−1)50. The red and blue shifts are consistent with the NLFFF extrapolation and MHD modeling, which indicate that the north edge of the current sheet is higher than the south edge. Moreover, the projected reconnection outflows derived from the moving fibrils are higher in the north region, suggesting a higher local Alfvén speed or motion away from the photosphere or both. However, the true peak velocity may be higher at the north side (as also indicated by the projected velocities), because the selected spectral line obviously samples only part of the upward reconnection outflow, due to a reduction of density and temperature (adiabatic cooling) in the free upward expansion of the plasma. Nevertheless, both reconnection outflows are spectroscopically detected and prove to be significantly higher near the edges of the current sheet than the outflows inferred from the Hα structures further away from the current sheet (Figs. 2p and 3d). It is also clear that the outflow is mainly downward at the southern edge of the current sheet and mainly upward at the northern edge. The implied reconnection rate, M ~ 0.0007 for the southern outflow, is still fast.
The cusp-shaped structures also appear in the non-thermal velocity maps. The highest non-thermal velocities were located in the current sheet, especially in the tip of the cusp-shaped structures, with values in the range ~180–300 km s−1, which significantly exceed the projected and Doppler velocities of the reconnection outflows. This suggests that the reconnection proceeds in a highly dynamic manner including unresolved turbulent motions, with plasmoid-mediated reconnection51,52 being the obvious candidate for the specific mode of reconnection realized in the event.
To determine the electron density in the current sheet, we used the theoretical line intensity ratios of the Fe XIV (λ264.92/λ274.37) density sensitive pair, which were calculated by using the CHIANTI atomic package53,54. Although the line λ 274.37 is blended with Si VII λ274.18, the blend can be safely ignored due to its low intensity compared with λ 274.37 in active region conditions. The number density values in the current sheet are found to scatter in the range from 108 to 1012 cm−3, similar to typical densities in filaments55. The highest values are located in the southern (lower) cusp.
Plasmoids
During the early slow-rise phase of the flare, from 07:57 to ~08:06 UT, many small bright blobs were observed, moving from the current sheet to the legs of the cusp-shaped structures. Figure 5 and the related Supplementary Movie 3 show the highlighted fine structures of the SDO/AIA 211 Å images revealed by the unsharp masking technique (see Methods, subsection Unsharp masking technique). There are many bright blobs marked by the yellow arrows moving from the reconnection region (see Fig. 5a–f). We suggest that the blobs are plasmoids created by secondary tearing (the plasmoid instability) in the reconnecting current sheet that develops at the separator or quasi-separator: in 2D these would be magnetic islands, but in 3D with an extra magnetic component out of the plane they become tiny twisted flux tubes, as clearly shown in the MHD simulation (see Results, subsection MHD simulation). The velocities of the blobs along the reconnected field lines are from 79 km s−1 to 208 km s−1 (see the time-distance diagram, Fig. 5g, obtained along the cyan-dotted line in Fig. 5a). Note that the y-axis denotes the direction information in the time-distance maps of Fig. 5g. The phenomenon that blobs move from the reconnection region along the separatrices, as found in a 3D particle simulation of reconnection56, is observed here. Their number, more than ten, is among the highest reported so far for a single reconnection event21,57. They support the interpretation of the high Fe XVII line widths as an indication of plasmoid-mediated reconnection. The increasing brightness and source width of the emissions prevented the detection of blobs by unsharp masking at later times, but their continued formation is suggested by the continued presence of high non-thermal velocities in the EIS spectra, efficient particle acceleration revealed by the hard X-rays, and the numerical modeling below.
Heating
The heating and brightening resulting from the reconnection can also clearly be seen in all AIA wavebands. The Supplementary Movie 2 shows the evolution of the EUV and UV observations at eight wavelengths and of the line-of-sight magnetogram. The cusp-shaped regions of outflowing hot plasma are obvious, as is the current sheet between them. Six EUV wavelengths observed by AIA were used to obtain the differential emission measure (DEM), total EM, and temperature maps shown in Fig. 6a–f. The X-shaped geometry of the reconnection region can be seen in the whole temperature range of T > 1 MK, and the peak temperature in the reconnection region reaches about 10 MK.
X-ray spectroscopy of accelerated particles
The X-ray sources from RHESSI in Fig. 6g–i show that X-ray emission >3 keV is emitted from the beginning of the event’s slow-rise phase (Fig. 6g). Higher energies are reached following the development of the flare, and the highest energy release rate into hard X-rays around 08:18 UT coincides with the steepest slope of the soft X-ray light curve (Fig. 3a), as is typically the case in flares. The emission comes mainly from the current sheet, different from eruptive flares, where the foot point sources are usually strongest3. Thus, the hard X-rays provide a direct diagnostic of the conditions in the current sheet. These are the maps of hard X-ray emission from a reconnecting current sheet in a confined flare on disk. The emission originates preferentially from the lower (southern) cusp, where the density in the sheet was found to be highest, similar to limb flares with occulted foot points58.
Figure 7 shows the RHESSI hard X-ray photon spectra taken at about 08:12 UT and 08:19 UT. The temperatures derived from the fitted spectra are 13.1 MK (Fig. 7a) and 33.6 MK (Fig. 7b); this extends the results of the DEM analysis of the AIA EUV data which are limited to ≈11 MK. Moreover, the spectra show both thermal and non-thermal components. The emission above ~25 keV is of non-thermal nature, indicating particle acceleration in the current sheet by the fast reconnection process. Particle acceleration by reconnection is known to be particularly efficient when multiple plasmoids form, implying multiple X-lines27,59,60. This corroborates the deduction above that plasmoid-mediated reconnection was at work.
MHD simulation
To reveal the 3D structure and evolution of the reconnecting field, we have simulated the reconnection process using a data-constrained high-resolution MHD model (see Methods, subsection Data-constrained simulation). Figure 8 and the related Supplementary Movie 4 show the magnetic topology in a snapshot of the model immediately prior to the onset of reconnection, including the 3D structure of the central current sheet, sample field lines around the current sheet, and the associated separatrices or QSLs, which are revealed as regions of high squashing degree Q61,62. The preferred locations for the formation of current sheets and therefore of reconnection in flares are either null points, separators or quasi-separators40; separators originate in null points or bald patches and represent the intersection of two separatrices, while quasi-separators (or hyperbolic flux tubes) represent the intersection of two QSLs. Maps of Q reveal separatrices or QSLs, but do not distinguish between them. QSLs are locations where the gradient in fieldline footpoint mapping is large, whereas the mapping gradient is infinite at separatrices.
At this point, the magnetic field lines from the main positive sunspot in the east (left) part of the active region connect to the diffuse negative polarity in the north (the pink lines in Fig. 8a), while the field lines from the smaller positive spot in the west connect to the main negative spot (the green lines in Fig. 8a). This is similar in structure to the NLFFF in Fig. 1, although the twist in the magnetic flux of the filament is not recovered by the extrapolation technique used to construct the initial condition. The main electric current is located between these two groups of field lines (Fig. 8b, c). Both the field lines and current sheet extend to somewhat greater heights at the northern edge, consistent with the spectroscopically inferred upward direction of the north reconnection outflow (Fig. 4f). Although the current sheet extends from the bottom of the box up to about 20 Mm, the reconnecting flux, as visualized by the field lines, extends mostly over the range z ~ 5–15 Mm. Outside this range, the current sheet is shorter and the reconnection flows remain weaker and less extended during the subsequent MHD evolution. In particular, no reconnection flows are observed to develop at z ≲ 1 Mm. The current sheet at the chosen level of the iso-surface coincides with the QSL at the highest values of Q. The high-Q surface outlines the separatrices or QSLs of the reconnecting flux (Fig. 8d) and aligns with the current sheet and its downward extensions to the flare ribbons, as observed in Hα (Fig. 8e) and EUV (Fig. 8f).
The current sheet and separatrices or QSLs extend to the bottom plane directly under the coronal current sheet and cusps as well as in the flare ribbons and beyond (Fig. 8b–f). However, since the field in and around the current sheet is closer to the horizontal direction than to the vertical, the current sheet is magnetically connected to the bottom plane (chromosphere on the Sun) only in the more remote traces of the separatrices/QSLs, i.e., in the flare ribbons and beyond. Supplementary Fig. 4 shows that most of the field lines from the significantly reconnecting height range in the current sheet (z ~ 3–15 Mm) are rooted in the observed Hα ribbons. Some are rooted in or near more distant parts of the separatrix/QSL traces, but spread out more, implying a lower density of energy deposition in the chromosphere. Since the energy transport in the corona proceeds exclusively along the field, these magnetic connections perfectly support the interpretation of the more remote brightenings (contours in Fig. 2p–t) as classical chromospheric flare ribbons energized by reconnection in the coronal current sheet.
Since this realistic, data-constrained model of the current sheet includes a guide field component in the direction of the current flow, the plasmoids seen in the current density distribution (Fig. 9b) are small, 3D flux ropes in the field line plots56 (Figs. 9a and 10a, b). As observed in two-dimensional simulations51,52, as well as in the observations presented above, plasmoids form dynamically and repeatedly, and are accelerated along the current sheet. One of the plasmoids indicated by the arrows in Figs. 9b and 10a moves from near the south cusp structure to the north cusp structure. The speed of the plasmoid is approximately 300 km s−1, which is close to the observed one. Two new plasmoids are seen to form in Fig. 9b. Between the plasmoids, the current sheet steepens to the limit allowed by the numerical resolution. The simulation clearly corresponds well to the observations from the global to the plasmoid scale. The plasmoids appeared only after adaptive mesh refinement was applied to permit the current sheet width to shrink to an aspect ratio of ~ 0.01, in agreement with the theoretical prediction for the occurrence of the plasmoid instability63.
Released energy
A rough estimate of the way reconnection releases the magnetic energy required to power an M-class flare (~1024 J) can be made as follows. We expect that part of the energy is released in the reconnecting current sheet and a further part is released by the untwisting of the filament-flux rope after it is connected to the diffuse remote polarity. Suppose first that oppositely directed magnetic field of strength Bi is brought in from both sides at speed vi for a time τ towards a reconnection region of surface area \({{L}_{0}}^{2}\), where the current sheet and attached slow-mode shock waves convert the energy. The magnetic energy is brought in from both sides from a volume \(2{L}_{0}^{2}{L}_{{{{{{{{\rm{i}}}}}}}}}\), where Li = viτ, and so the total energy calculated is
Evaluating this for a field strength of ~500 G (see Supplementary Fig. 2), which is exceeded in a cross section of the filament-flux rope of diameter >10 Mm in the NLFFF, and L0 = 15″ (10.9 Mm), vi = 2 km s−1, and τ = 70 min as obtained from the Hα data, the energy is estimated to be ~1024 J. This corresponds well to the energy release of ~1024 J (9.6 × 1030 erg) in the simulation and agrees with the canonical picture that the flare is powered by magnetic reconnection.
Additional magnetic energy may be liberated by the untwisting of the flux rope which holds the filament. The energy associated with the twist component of the flux rope field, Bϕ = (R/a)B0ϕ, can be written as
where R, a and LR are the rope’s major and minor radii and length. Suppose the twist on the edge of the flux rope is Φ, then Φ = (LB0ϕ)/(aBz) and B0ϕ is aΦBz/LR. In the present case, we have LR = 100″ from the Hα data, and the NLFFF extrapolation indicates that the twist peaks near the center of the flux rope, with an average value of Φ ~ 5π in a cross section of radius a ≈ 2. 5″ and negligible twist in the outer parts of the rope; also Bz ~ 500 G (see Supplementary Fig. 3). This yields a value of WFR ~ 1023 J, significantly smaller than the energy released in the reconnecting current sheet.
In summary, the presented high-resolution imaging and spectral observations demonstrate that fast magnetic reconnection of the coronal field, part of which supports a filament at chromospheric temperatures, released the magnetic energy which powered the solar flare. Plasmoid-mediated reconnection is strongly indicated by direct imaging and nonthermal EUV and hard X-ray spectra. This is further supported by a 3D data-constrained MHD simulation which reproduces the observed change in connectivity, agrees with estimates of the energy release, and reveals the appearance of twisted plasmoids (mini flux ropes) at the theoretically expected threshold.
Discussion
In order to understand why reconnection occurred so many times in this place, the evolution of the magnetic and flow fields in the photosphere was investigated using HMI vector magnetograms. The vector magnetogram is shown in Supplementary Fig. 5a–c, where the blue arrows represent the horizontal magnetic field. The corresponding flow field was calculated from the radial magnetic field using the DAVE algorithm64 (see Methods, subsection Velocity field calculation) (see Supplementary Fig. 5d–f and the related Supplementary Movie 5). This reveals a flow toward the magnetic reconnection site from the west (right) side, which pushes together oppositely directed flux in the lower corona (as found in the MHD simulation). This persistent flow in the photosphere is likely to be the main reason why so many flares (three M-class flares and several C-class flares of similar morphology in the first half of 2014 February 2) occurred in the same place. Additional distortions of the coronal field configuration, also likely to support the onset of reconnection, are produced by the emergence of flux very near the reconnection site (yellow ellipses in Supplementary Fig. 5b, c) and subsequent motion toward the reconnection site. The flows at the east (left) side are more variable, with directions along and away from the current sheet alternating. The latter is the most likely explanation of the separation of the reconnecting flux after ~08:14 UT in the present event, as indicated by the retraction of the chromospheric fibrils at the east (left) side of the current sheet (Fig. 3c), as well as for the termination of the other homologous events on the same day.
For the specific event studied here, the coronal field was also strongly perturbed by the partial, confined eruption of the filament during the peak phase of the flare. The confinement has likely led to the termination of the reconnection inflows at the west side of the current sheet (Fig. 3c).
A neighboring eruption may have had an additional influence. The M-class flare studied here was preceded by a weaker, C-class flare above another polarity inversion line in the complex active region, lying to the east of the main positive sunspot, at (x, y) ≈ ( −340, −50). The C-class flare was caused by the rise of flux in the corona above the filament located at that inversion line. Temporarily, the associated large-scale change of the coronal field, due to the expansion of that flux, may have played an additional role in pushing the magnetic loops rooted in the chromospheric fibrils toward the filament.
Methods
Observational data
Images in the center of the Hα line at 6562.8 Å obtained at the 1 m New Vacuum Solar Telescope (NVST) at Fuxian Lake44, are used in this study. The spatial resolution of Hα line center images is a pixel size of 0.\({}^{\prime}\)\({}^{\prime}\)163 and the time cadence is 12 s.The Level 1 data are obtained by using the raw data (Level 0) subtracting the dark current and flat field and then we used the speckle masking method65 to reconstruct these Level 1 data to get Level 1+ data.
Full-disk UV and EUV images observed by SDO/AIA47 are also used to clarify the process of magnetic reconnection. These images have a 12 s cadence and a spatial resolution of 0.\({}^{\prime}\)\({}^{\prime}\)6 per pixel. Vector magnetograms from the Space Weather HMI Active Region Patch (SHARP) series observed by the Helioseismic and Magnetic Imager (HMI)45,66,67 on board SDO are used to show the evolution of the magnetic field in the photosphere, to infer the photospheric velocity field, and to perform a data-constrained simulation of the event. The vector magnetograms have a pixel scale of about 0.\({}^{\prime}\)\({}^{\prime}\)5 and a cadence of 12 min. They are derived by using the Very Fast Inversion of the Stokes Vector algorithm68. We used the minimum energy method69,70 to resolve the 180 degree azimuthal ambiguity of the vector magnetograms. The images are remapped using a Lambert (cylindrical equal area) projection centered on the midpoint of the AR, which is tracked at the Carrington rotation rate71.
The spectral data observed by the EUV Imaging Spectrometer (EIS) on board the Hinode mission were used to derive the Doppler velocity and non-thermal velocity in the reconnection region. Hinode/EIS49 is a scanning slit spectrometer that uses two EUV wave bands. One is 170–210 Å and the other is 250–290 Å. Its spectral resolution is about 0.0223 Å pixel−1. The accuracy of the obtained velocities can reach a few km s−1. Fortunately, the EIS observation covered the whole duration of the reconnection event and nearly its whole area. Therefore, it is well-suited for conducting a study of magnetic reconnection. We use the line Fe XVII 255 Å (\({{{{{{\mathrm{log}}}}}}}\,T\,=\,6.6\)). The field of view (FOV) is 161\({}^{\prime}\)\({}^{\prime}\) in the raster direction and 152\({}^{\prime}\)\({}^{\prime}\) in the slit direction. The spectral profiles are fitted with single Gaussian functions. The reference wavelength used to determine the Doppler and non-thermal velocities is taken from the average of each raster. The sparse raster used the 2″ slit with a step size of 2.″995 and an exposure time of 4–6 s.
Data from RHESSI48 are also employed to study the soft and hard X-ray sources during the M-class flare. The energy ranges of 3–6, 6–12, 12–25, and 25–50 keV were selected to observe the evolution of these sources during the magnetic reconnection. We used the clean imaging algorithm to construct the X-ray images and the accumulation time is about 30 s.
Data-constrained simulation
We solve the fully 3D and time-dependent equations with bottom boundary conditions driven continuously72,73 by the evolving photospheric vector magnetic field taken by SDO/HMI (see Observational data). The initial magnetic configuration is obtained from the SDO/HMI vector magnetogram at 08:00 UT using an MHD relaxation technique73, and the background coronal atmosphere is initialized by a isothermal plasma (T = 106 K, corresponding to a sound speed of cS = 128 km s−1) in a hydrostatic state. In order to mimic the coronal low-β and highly tenuous conditions, we use a plasma density to ensure that the smallest value of plasma β is 2 × 10−3 (and thus the largest Alfvén speed is 4 Mm s−1). The plasma thermodynamics are simplified to be adiabatic. We used the magnetic field of the photosphere as the bottom boundary of this model, which is assumed to be a reasonable approximation of the coronal base. To obtain the detailed structure in the current sheet, an adaptive refinement mesh is used with highest resolution of 1/16 arcsecond (i.e., 45 km) to capture the fine structures in the reconnecting current sheet.
Unsharp masking technique
The unsharp masking technique22 is applied to SDO/AIA 211 Å images to highlight fine structures like blobs. First, a background image by smoothing the original image is obtained as an unsharp masked image. Second, the enhanced image is the residual of the original image subtracting the background one. A smoothing window of 7 × 7 pixels is adopted for optimal effects.
NLFFF extrapolation
The three-dimensional magnetic structures of the filament and the magnetic loops are reconstructed by using an optimization algorithm that is developed by Wiegelman74. Before the NLFFF extrapolation, we modified the bottom vector magnetic field data observed by SDO/HMI by using a preprocessing procedure75 to remove most of the net force and torque, which may lead to an inconsistency between the photospheric magnetic field and the force-free assumption in the NLFFF models. The software Paraview is used to show the visualization of the 3D magnetic field.
RHESSI spectrum
The Object Spectral Executive (OSPEX)76 software is used to produce the RHESSI hard X-ray photon spectra with the background subtracted. The spectra were fitted by using the combination of the single-temperature thermal bremsstrahlung radiation function (vth) and the thick-target non-thermal bremsstrahlung with an isotropic pitch-angle distribution (thick2). The detailed explanations of the fitting parameters can be seen from https://sprg.ssl.berkeley.edu/t̃ohban/wiki/index.php/Vth_-_Variable_Thermal and https://sprg.ssl.berkeley.edu/t̃ohban/wiki/index.php/Thick2_-_Thick_Target_Bremsstrahlung_Version_2.
Velocity field calculation
The photospheric flow fields were derived by using the method of the differential affine velocity estimator (DAVE)64,77 based on the data of the HMI vector magnetograms. In the DAVE method, the advection equation and a differential feature tracking technique were combined together to detect flow fields. The window size is set as 19 pixels, which is the best choice for structure information and spatial resolution.
Data availability
The NVST data can be accessed at http://fso.ynao.ac.cn/dataarchive_ql.aspx. Photospheric magnetograms are provided by the HMI on SDO. All SDO data are publicly available at http://jsoc.stanford.edu/ajax/lookdata.htmland at http://helioviewer.org/. The Hinode/EIS data are publicly available at http://solarb.mssl.ucl.ac.uk/SolarB/SearchArchive.jsp. The RHESSI data are publicly available at https://hesperia.gsfc.nasa.gov/hessidata/. Source data for all the Figures except for Figs. 8, 9 and 10 due to large size of the 3D MHD simulation data are provided with the paper. The MHD simulation datasets generated during and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author upon request. Source data are provided with this paper.
Code availability
The method of obtaining the GOES soft X-ray flux is publicly available at https://hesperia.gsfc.nasa.gov/rhessidatacenter/complementary_data/goes.html. The Solar Software package is available at http://www.lmsal.com/solarsoft/. The DAVE code is available at https://ccmc.gsfc.nasa.gov/lwsrepository/index.php. The detailed descriptions of using OSPEX and NLFFF extrapolation are available at https://hesperia.gsfc.nasa.gov/ssw/packages/spex/doc/ospex_explanation.htm and http://sprg.ssl.berkeley.edu/j̃imm/fff/optimization_fff.html. MHD simulation code used in this study is available upon request.
References
Priest, E. R. & Forbes, T. G. The magnetic nature of solar flares. Astron. Astrophys. Rev. 10, 313–377 (2002).
Fletcher, L. et al. An observational overview of solar flares. Space Sci. Rev. 159, 19–106 (2011).
Benz, A. O. Flare observations. Living Rev. Sol. Phys. 14, 2 (2017).
Carmichael, H. A process for flares. NASA Spec. Publ. 50, 451 (1964).
Sturrock, P. A. Model of the high-energy phase of solar flares. Nature 211, 695–697 (1966).
Hirayama, T. Theoretical model of flares and prominences. I: Evaporating flare model. Sol. Phys. 34, 323–338 (1974).
Kopp, R. A. & Pneuman, G. W. Magnetic reconnection in the corona and the loop prominence phenomenon. Sol. Phys. 50, 85–98 (1976).
Ji, H., Wang, H., Schmahl, E. J., Moon, Y. J. & Jiang, Y. Observations of the failed eruption of a filament. Astrophys. J. Lett. 595, L135–L138 (2003).
Török, T. & Kliem, B. Confined and ejective eruptions of kink-unstable flux ropes. Astrophys. J. Lett. 630, L97–L100 (2005).
Li, L. et al. Magnetic reconnection between a solar filament and nearby coronal loops. Nat. Phys. 12, 847–851 (2016).
Tsuneta, S. et al. Observation of a solar flare at the limb with the YOHKOH soft X-ray telescope. Pub. Astron. Soc. Jpn. 44, L63–L69 (1992).
Tsuneta, S. Structure and dynamics of magnetic reconnection in a solar flare. Astrophys. J. 456, 840 (1996).
Shibata, K. Evidence of magnetic reconnection in solar flares and a unified model of flares. Astrophys. Space Sci. 264, 129–144 (1999).
Lin, J. & Forbes, T. G. Effects of reconnection on the coronal mass ejection process. J. Geophys. Res. 105, 2375–2392 (2000).
Yokoyama, T., Akita, K., Morimoto, T., Inoue, K. & Newmark, J. Clear evidence of reconnection inflow of a solar flare. Astrophys. J. Lett. 546, L69–L72 (2001).
Sui, L. & Holman, G. D. Evidence for the formation of a large-scale current sheet in a solar flare. Astrophys. J. Lett. 596, L251–L254 (2003).
Lin, J. et al. Direct observations of the magnetic reconnection site of an eruption on 2003 November 18. Astrophys. J. 622, 1251–1264 (2005).
Savage, S. L. et al. Low-altitude reconnection inflow-outflow observations during a 2010 November 3 solar eruption. Astrophys. J. 754, 13 (2012).
Su, Y. et al. Imaging coronal magnetic-field reconnection in a solar flare. Nat. Phys. 9, 489–493 (2013).
Yan, X. L. et al. Simultaneous observation of a flux rope eruption and magnetic reconnection during an X-class solar flare. Astrophys. J. Lett. 853, L18 (2018).
Takasao, S., Asai, A., Isobe, H. & Shibata, K. Simultaneous observation of reconnection inflow and outflow associated with the 2010 August 18 solar flare. Astrophys. J. Lett. 745, L6 (2012).
Gou, T., Liu, R., Kliem, B., Wang, Y. & Veronig, A. M. The birth of a coronal mass ejection. Sci. Adv. 5, 7004 (2019).
Cheng, X. et al. Observations of turbulent magnetic reconnection within a solar current sheet. Astrophys. J. 866, 64 (2018).
Xue, Z. et al. Observing the release of twist by magnetic reconnection in a solar filament eruption. Nat. Commun. 7, 11837 (2016).
Sun, J. Q. et al. Extreme ultraviolet imaging of three-dimensional magnetic reconnection in a solar eruption. Nat. Commun. 6, 7598 (2015).
Masuda, S., Kosugi, T., Hara, H., Tsuneta, S. & Ogawara, Y. A loop-top hard X-ray source in a compact solar flare as evidence for magnetic reconnection. Nature 371, 495–497 (1994).
Arnold, H. et al. Electron acceleration during macroscale magnetic reconnection. Phys. Rev. Lett. 126, 135101 (2021).
Warmuth, A. & Mann, G. Thermal-nonthermal energy partition in solar flares derived from X-ray, EUV, and bolometric observations. Discussion of recent studies. Astron. Astrophys. 644, A172 (2020).
Innes, D. E., Guo, L.-J., Huang, Y.-M. & Bhattacharjee, A. IRIS Si IV line profiles: an indication for the plasmoid instability during small-scale magnetic reconnection on the Sun. Astrophys. J. 813, 86 (2015).
Guo, L.-J., De Pontieu, B., Huang, Y.-M., Peter, H. & Bhattacharjee, A. Observations and modeling of the onset of fast reconnection in the solar transition region. Astrophys. J. 901, 148 (2020).
Kliem, B., Karlický, M. & Benz, A. O. Solar flare radio pulsations as a signature of dynamic magnetic reconnection. Astron. Astrophys. 360, 715–728 (2000).
French, R. J., Judge, P. G., Matthews, S. A. & van Driel-Gesztelyi, L. Spectropolarimetric insight into plasma sheet dynamics of a solar flare. Astrophys. J. Lett. 887, L34 (2019).
Chitta, L. P. & Lazarian, A. Onset of turbulent fast magnetic reconnection observed in the solar atmosphere. Astrophys. J. Lett. 890, L2 (2020).
Tian, H. et al. Imaging and spectroscopic observations of magnetic reconnection and chromospheric evaporation in a solar flare. Astrophys. J. Lett. 797, L14 (2014).
Yang, S., Zhang, J. & Xiang, Y. Magnetic reconnection between small-scale loops observed with the new vacuum solar telescope. Astrophys. J. Lett. 798, L11 (2015).
Wang, T., Sui, L. & Qiu, J. Direct observation of high-speed plasma outflows produced by magnetic reconnection in solar impulsive events. Astrophys. J. Lett. 661, L207–L210 (2007).
Yu, S. et al. Magnetic reconnection during the post-impulsive phase of a long-duration solar flare: bidirectional outflows as a cause of microwave and X-ray bursts. Astrophys. J. 900, 17 (2020).
Burch, J. L. et al. Electron-scale measurements of magnetic reconnection in space. Science 352, aaf2939 (2016).
Phan, T. D. et al. Electron magnetic reconnection without ion coupling in Earth’s turbulent magnetosheath. Nature 557, 202–206 (2018).
Li, T., Priest, E. & Guo, R. Three-dimensional magnetic reconnection in astrophysical plasmas. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. Ser. A 477, 20200949 (2021).
Hale, G. E., Ellerman, F., Nicholson, S. B. & Joy, A. H. The magnetic polarity of sun-spots. Astrophys. J. 49, 153 (1919).
Liu, R., Chen, J., Wang, Y. & Liu, K. Investigating energetic X-shaped flares on the outskirts of A solar active region. Sci. Rep. 6, 34021 (2016).
Kawabata, Y., Inoue, S. & Shimizu, T. Non-potential field formation in the X-shaped quadrupole magnetic field configuration. Astrophys. J. 842, 106 (2017).
Liu, Z. et al. New vacuum solar telescope and observations with high resolution. Res. Astron. Astrophys. 14, 705–718 (2014).
Schou, J. et al. Design and ground calibration of the helioseismic and magnetic imager (HMI) instrument on the solar dynamics observatory (SDO). Sol. Phys. 275, 229–259 (2012).
Xue, Z., Yan, X., Yang, L., Wang, J. & Zhao, L. Observing formation of flux rope by tether-cutting reconnection in the Sun. Astrophys. J. Lett. 840, L23 (2017).
Lemen, J. R. et al. The atmospheric imaging assembly (AIA) on the solar dynamics observatory (SDO). Sol. Phys. 275, 17–40 (2012).
Lin, R. P. et al. The Reuven Ramaty high-energy solar spectroscopic imager (RHESSI). Sol. Phys. 210, 3–32 (2002).
Culhane, J. L. et al. The EUV imaging spectrometer for hinode. Sol. Phys. 243, 19–61 (2007).
Kosugi, T. et al. The Hinode (Solar-B) mission: an overview. Sol. Phys. 243, 3–17 (2007).
Bhattacharjee, A., Huang, Y.-M., Yang, H. & Rogers, B. Fast reconnection in high-Lundquist-number plasmas due to the plasmoid Instability. Phys. Plasmas 16, 112102 (2009).
Ni, L., Kliem, B., Lin, J. & Wu, N. Fast magnetic reconnection in the solar chromosphere mediated by the plasmoid instability. Astrophys. J. 799, 79 (2015).
Dere, K. P., Landi, E., Mason, H. E., Monsignori Fossi, B. C. & Young, P. R. CHIANTI - an atomic database for emission lines. Astron. Astrophys. Suppl. 125, 149–173 (1997).
Landi, E. et al. CHIANTI-an atomic database for emission lines. VII. New data for X-rays and other improvements. Astrophys. J. Supl. Ser. 162, 261–280 (2006).
Labrosse, N. et al. Physics of solar prominences: I—spectral diagnostics and non-LTE modelling. Space Sci. Rev. 151, 243–332 (2010).
Daughton, W. et al. Role of electron physics in the development of turbulent magnetic reconnection in collisionless plasmas. Nat. Phys. 7, 539–542 (2011).
Longcope, D., Unverferth, J., Klein, C., McCarthy, M. & Priest, E. Evidence for downflows in the narrow plasma sheet of 2017 September 10 and their significance for flare reconnection. Astrophys. J. 868, 148 (2018).
Krucker, S. & Battaglia, M. Particle densities within the acceleration region of a solar flare. Astrophys. J. 780, 107 (2014).
Kliem, B. Particle orbits, trapping, and acceleration in a filamentary current sheet model. Astrophys. J. Supl. Ser. 90, 719–728 (1994).
Drake, J. F., Swisdak, M., Che, H. & Shay, M. A. Electron acceleration from contracting magnetic islands during reconnection. Nature 443, 553–556 (2006).
Titov, V. S., Hornig, G. & Démoulin, P. Theory of magnetic connectivity in the solar corona. J. Geophys. Res. 107, 1164 (2002).
Priest, E. R. & Démoulin, P. Three-dimensional magnetic reconnection without null points. 1. Basic theory of magnetic flipping. J. Geophys. Res. 100, 23443–23464 (1995).
Ji, H. & Daughton, W. Phase diagram for magnetic reconnection in heliophysical, astrophysical, and laboratory plasmas. Phys. Plasmas 18, 111207–111207 (2011).
Schuck, P. W. Tracking magnetic footpoints with the magnetic induction equation. Astrophys. J. 646, 1358–1391 (2006).
Xiang, Y.-y, Liu, Z. & Jin, Z.-y High resolution reconstruction of solar prominence images observed by the new vacuum solar telescope. N. Astron 49, 8–12 (2016).
Bobra, M. G. et al. The helioseismic and magnetic imager (HMI) vector magnetic field pipeline: SHARPs - space-weather HMI active region patches. Sol. Phys. 289, 3549–3578 (2014).
Centeno, R. et al. The Helioseismic and Magnetic Imager (HMI) vector magnetic field pipeline: optimization of the spectral line inversion code. Sol. Phys. 289, 3531–3547 (2014).
Borrero, J. M. et al. VFISV: very fast inversion of the stokes vector for the helioseismic and magnetic imager. Sol. Phys. 273, 267–293 (2011).
Metcalf, T. R. Resolving the 180-degree ambiguity in vector magnetic field measurements: the ’minimum’ energy solution. Sol. Phys. 155, 235–242 (1994).
Leka, K. D. et al. Resolving the 180deg ambiguity in solar vector magnetic field data: evaluating the effects of noise, spatial resolution, and method assumptions. Sol. Phys. 260, 83–108 (2009).
Sun, X. On the coordinate system of space-weather HMI active region patches (SHARPs): a technical note. Preprint at https://arxiv.org/abs/1309.2392 (2013).
Jiang, C., Wu, S. T., Feng, X. & Hu, Q. Data-driven magnetohydrodynamic modelling of a flux-emerging active region leading to solar eruption. Nat. Commun. 7, 11522 (2016).
Jiang, C. et al. Reconstruction of a large-scale pre-flare coronal current sheet associated with a homologous X-shaped flare. Astrophys. J. 850, 8 (2017).
Wiegelmann, T. Optimization code with weighting function for the reconstruction of coronal magnetic fields. Sol. Phys. 219, 87–108 (2004).
Wiegelmann, T., Inhester, B. & Sakurai, T. Preprocessing of Vector Magnetograph Data for a Nonlinear Force-Free Magnetic Field Reconstruction. Sol. Phys. 233, 215–232 (2006).
Schwartz, R. A. et al. RHESSI Data Analysis Software: Rationale and Methods. Sol. Phys. 210, 165–191 (2002).
Liu, Y., Zhao, J. & Schuck, P. W. Horizontal Flows in the Photosphere and Subphotosphere of Two Active Regions. Sol. Phys. 287, 279–291 (2013).
Acknowledgements
We would like to thank the NVST, SDO/AIA, SDO/HMI, GOES, RHESSI, and Hinode teams for high-cadence data support. This work is sponsored by the National Science Foundation of China (NSFC) under the grant numbers (11873087, 11973084, 11803085, 2019FD085, 12003064, 11633008, 11763004, U1831210, 11803002), by the Yunnan Key Science Foundation of China under numbers (2018FA001, 2018FB007) and Yunnan Science Foundation for Distinguished Young Scholars No. 202001AV070004, by Project Supported by the Specialized Research Fund for State Key Laboratories, by Key Research and Development Project of Yunnan Province under number 202003AD150019, and by the joint NSFC/DFG Grant 41761134088/KL817.8-1. C.W.J. acknowledges support by National Natural Science Foundation of China (41822404, 42174200), the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (grant No. HIT.BRETIV.201901), and Shenzhen Technology Project under grant number JCYJ20190806142609035. B.K. acknowledges support by the DFG. The computing resources for the data-constrained MHD simulation was provided by National Supercomputer Center in Tianjin, and the calculations were performed on TianHe 1 A.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
X.L.Y. developed the ideas, performed analysis of the data, wrote the draft manuscript, and led the discussion of the manuscript. Z.K.X., L.H.Y., J.C.W., D.F.K. and Y.L.S. performed analysis of the data. C.W.J. carried out the MHD simulation. E.R.P. and B.K. contributed to the interpretation of the data and to the discussion. X.S.F. and Z.L. contributed to the discussion. All authors reviewed the manuscript.
Corresponding authors
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Peer review
Peer review information
Nature Communications thanks Brigitte Schmieder, and the other, anonymous, reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work. Peer reviewer reports are available.
Additional information
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Source data
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Yan, X., Xue, Z., Jiang, C. et al. Fast plasmoid-mediated reconnection in a solar flare. Nat Commun 13, 640 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-022-28269-w
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-022-28269-w
This article is cited by
-
Developments of a fundamental mechanism for initiation of solar eruptions
Reviews of Modern Plasma Physics (2024)
-
A Statistical Investigation of the Neupert Effect in Solar Flares Observed with ASO-S/HXI
Solar Physics (2024)
-
Consecutive narrow and broad quasi-periodic fast-propagating wave trains associated with a flare
Science China Physics, Mechanics & Astronomy (2024)
-
Circular-ribbon flares and the related activities
Reviews of Modern Plasma Physics (2024)
-
Ultra-high-resolution observations of persistent null-point reconnection in the solar corona
Nature Communications (2023)
Comments
By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.