In contrast to the well-recognized permafrost carbon (C) feedback to climate change, the fate of permafrost nitrogen (N) after thaw is poorly understood. According to mounting evidence, part of the N liberated from permafrost may be released to the atmosphere as the strong greenhouse gas (GHG) nitrous oxide (N2O). Here, we report post-thaw N2O release from late Pleistocene permafrost deposits called Yedoma, which store a substantial part of permafrost C and N and are highly vulnerable to thaw. While freshly thawed, unvegetated Yedoma in disturbed areas emit little N2O, emissions increase within few years after stabilization, drying and revegetation with grasses to high rates (548 (133–6286) μg N m−2 day−1; median with (range)), exceeding by 1–2 orders of magnitude the typical rates from permafrost-affected soils. Using targeted metagenomics of key N cycling genes, we link the increase in in situ N2O emissions with structural changes of the microbial community responsible for N cycling. Our results highlight the importance of extra N availability from thawing Yedoma permafrost, causing a positive climate feedback from the Arctic in the form of N2O emissions.
Rapid Arctic warming1 and associated permafrost thaw2,3 are threatening the large C and N reservoirs of northern permafrost soils4,5,6, accumulated under cold conditions where the decomposition rate of soil organic matter (SOM) is low7,8. Permafrost thaw is now increasingly exposing these long-term inert C and N pools to microbial decomposition and transformation processes. While it is long known that mobilization of permafrost C potentially increase the release of the greenhouse gases (GHG) carbon dioxide (CO2) and methane (CH4)5,9,10, the fate of soil N liberated upon permafrost thaw is poorly studied and more complex. There is evidence that part of liberated N may be emitted to the atmosphere as nitrogenous gases, most importantly as N2O6, which is a ~300 times more powerful GHG than CO2 over a 100-year time horizon11 and a dominant contributor to ozone destruction in the stratosphere12.
The current increase in atmospheric N2O concentration is mainly driven by the growth of human-induced emissions, which comprise 43% of the global N2O emissions of 17.0 Tg N year−1 and are dominated by N2O release from fertilized agricultural soils13. Nitrous oxide emissions, although generally smaller per unit area, occur also from soils under natural vegetation with a 33% contribution to the total global N2O emission13. Tropical soils with high N turnover rates generally show the largest N2O emissions among natural soils, while permafrost-affected soils in cold environments have been thought to be negligible N2O sources. This view was challenged by a recent synthesis showing that N2O emissions commonly occur from permafrost soils, with a global emission between 0.08 and 1.27 Tg N year−1, meaning a 1–23% addition to the global N2O emission from natural soils6. However, this estimate is still highly uncertain due to the overall scarcity of N2O flux observations from permafrost-affected soils and the lack of studies from some important permafrost soil types, including the Yedoma studied here.
Late-Pleistocene aged Yedoma permafrost occurs as deep deposits (a mean thickness of ~19 m) over an area of > 1 million km2 in the Northern Hemisphere (Fig. 1)14. The Yedoma region contains >25% of the circumarctic permafrost C stock15, and a yet unaccounted for and likely even larger proportion of permafrost N because of the low C/N ratio of Yedoma SOM (typically < 15)16,17. The SOM in Yedoma is thought to be easily decomposable because it was incorporated into the permafrost soon after deposition without having much time to be degraded15. The high ice content of Yedoma14 makes it vulnerable for abrupt thaw and ground collapse18, allowing rapid mobilization of soil C and N stocks after thaw15. Along Arctic rivers and the coastal zone of the Arctic Shelf, thawing of Yedoma permafrost creates steep, tens-of-meters-high Yedoma exposures19,20,21, where many of the conditions known to promote N2O emissions from permafrost-affected soils6 are met, including low C/N ratios, lack of vegetation, and suitable soil moisture content for microbial processes producing N2O.
Here, we studied N2O fluxes on two thawing Yedoma exposures forming retrogressive thaw slumps in Northeast Siberia: In July 2016 on Kurungnakh Island situated in the Lena River Delta and in July 2017 in Duvanny Yar located by the Kolyma River (See Methods section; Fig. 1). At both sites, we measured N2O fluxes with the static chamber technique22 and determined the mineral N pools on transects spanning from the top of the thawing Yedoma exposure across the bare and revegetated parts down to the river shore (see Methods section; Supplementary Figs. 1 & 2). At the intensive study site Kurungnakh we additionally studied N transformation and N2O production rates in the laboratory, as well as the relative abundance of N cycling genes. We revealed an increasing trend in N2O emissions with drying, stabilization, and revegetation of the thawed Yedoma sediments. Increased emissions were coupled with changes in the microbial community composition responsible for soil N transformation processes.
Results and discussion
Nitrous oxide emissions and mineral N pools across thawing Yedoma exposures
Our field flux measurements revealed substantial N2O release from Yedoma permafrost following thaw. At the Kurungnakh exposure, the N2O fluxes from thawed Yedoma surfaces were highly variable (63 (–19–6286) μg N m−2 day−1; median with (range)), at the high-end exceeding the typical fluxes from permafrost-affected soils (38 (6–189) μg N m−2 day−1; median with (25th–75th percentiles); ref. 6) by two orders of magnitude. The N2O emissions showed an increasing trend along the measuring transect (Fig. 2a, Supplementary Table 1) from the densely vegetated Holocene cover deposits overlying intact permafrost on the top of the riverbank, through the actively eroding upper part of the Yedoma exposure, down to the already stabilized lower part of the slope revegetated by mosses and grasses. The highest N2O emissions occurred from Yedoma which had thawed between 5 and 10 years ago (see Methods; Supplementary Fig. 1e, Supplementary Fig. 3) and that were revegetated by grasses (548 (133–6286) μg N m−2 day−1; mean with (range)). The emissions from these revegetated Yedoma soils in the mid part of the slope were significantly higher than the emissions from undisturbed vegetated Holocene cover and bare freshly thawed Yedoma (Dunn’s test, p < 0.05). Negligible N2O fluxes were detected from bare sand on the river shore that receives melt waters from the thawing Yedoma exposure above (Fig. 2a, Supplementary Table 1).
The spatial pattern in the N2O emissions in situ was confirmed by laboratory incubations with Kurungnakh soils, where the highest N2O production under anoxic conditions was found in Yedoma revegetated with grasses and the lowest in bare earlier thawed Yedoma and vegetated Holocene cover (Kruskall–Wallis test, p = 0.0004–0.007; Fig. 3a, Supplementary Table 4). Higher N2O production under the anoxic treatment than in the oxic treatment (Wilcoxon signed-rank test, p < 0.0001) shows that denitrification is the main N2O production pathway. The yet higher N2O production in anoxic conditions in the presence of acetylene in all soils except bare freshly thawed Yedoma (1.7 to 4.7 times depending on the surface type; Wilcoxon signed-rank test, p = 0.01) suggests that, in addition to N2O, a significant amount of N2 is emitted from the studied soils to the atmosphere.
The N2O fluxes at the Duvanny Yar exposure were less variable and lower than at the Kurungnakh exposure (Kruskall–Wallis test, p = 0.047), ranging from –147 to 222 μg N m−2 day−1 (Fig. 2a, Supplementary Table 1). The highest N2O emissions were again detected from thawed and revegetated Yedoma surfaces, but this time from those with mosses. There, the N2O emissions were significantly higher than from bare freshly thawed Yedoma (Dunn’s test, p = 0.010). Further, we found elevated N2O concentrations (mean ± SD 2.4 ± 2.1 ppm; compared to atmospheric N2O concentration of 0.33 ppm) in the soil pore gas in Yedoma covered by high dead standing biomass of the pioneering plant Descurainia sophioides (Supplementary Fig. 5a). We estimated (Supplementary Fig. 5b) the N2O flux at these surfaces at 314 μg N m−2 day−1 (median; range 26–3090), which is comparable to the N2O fluxes from the thawed and revegetated Yedoma in Kurungnakh, and by far higher than the fluxes from permafrost-affected soils generally6.
Of all N2O fluxes measured at the both study sites, 23% were negative, with highest uptake rates < −25 μg N m−2 day−1 observed from bare Yedoma sites with high soil water content (WFPS = 67–100%; Fig. 2a). Uptake of atmospheric N2O is commonly observed in wetland soils, where energetically more favorable electron acceptors, such as O2 or NO3− are absent6,23. However, we occasionally measured small negative N2O fluxes also from vegetated Holocene cover with very dry topsoil (Fig. 2a; WFPS = 6–15%), supporting previous observations of N2O uptake in dry oxic soils24,25. From all studied microsites, the median N2O flux was negative only in vegetated Holocene cover in Kurungnakh (−4 μg N m−2 day−1) and in freshly thawed Yedoma in Duvanny Yar (−9 μg N m−2 day−1) (Supplementary Table 1).
Nitrous oxide production relies on mineral N supply in excess of the immediate needs of microbes and plants6,26,27. High-latitude soils usually have a very low content of mineral N species, particularly of nitrate (NO3−)28, which can be expected to limit N2O emissions. At the Kurungnakh exposure, only the high-emitting revegetated Yedoma surfaces had measurable NO3− content, while no NO3− was detected elsewhere (Fig. 2c, Supplementary Table 2). The opposite spatial pattern in ammonium (NH4+) content (Dunn’s test, p < 0.05; Supplementary Table 2) could reflect high NH4+ consumption by nitrification in thawed and revegetated Yedoma (see below). In Duvanny Yar, NO3− content was generally low, except in bare and moss-covered thermokarst mounds called baydzherakhs (Supplementary Fig. 2c, e), where high NO3− content up to 116 mg N (kg dry weight (DW))−1 was found (Fig. 2c). Strong NO3− accumulation indicates high nitrification activity in these dry, well-aerated soils, and availability of precursors for N2O production by anaerobic denitrification in deeper, water-saturated soil layers or after rain events.
Effect of moisture and vegetation on N2O fluxes and N transformation rates
In previous studies, the highest emission rates of N2O from permafrost-affected soils have been found from soils without living plant cover, such as bare peat surfaces of permafrost peatlands or retrogressive thaw slumps lacking vegetation6,22,29,30. The main reason behind the generally higher emissions from unvegetated than vegetated soils is obvious: when plants are not taking up N from soil, the reactive N forms are entirely available for microbial activities and growth, including the microbial N transformations producing N2O6. So, why did the highest emissions in this study occur at sites revegetated after thaw, and not from bare parts of the exposure as expected?
An explanation for the high N2O emissions from revegetated compared to bare Yedoma could be that plant colonization indicates stabilization of the thawing Yedoma slope after the initial stages of rapid degradation and thaw slumping. This stabilization occurs at a time span between years to decades and is coupled with decreased sediment and water input and improved drainage19. The high-emitting revegetated Yedoma surfaces on Kurungnakh were located in the middle part of the exposure (Supplementary Fig. 6a) with intermediate soil moisture content (water-filled pore space (WFPS) 42–84%), as well as the high-emitting Yedoma surfaces revegetated with mosses in Duvanny Yar (Fig. 2a). The revegetated Yedoma surfaces with grasses in Duvanny Yar were located lower down the slope and had higher moisture content (WFPS 69–90%). The role of soil moisture as a primary environmental control on N2O fluxes, and the bell-shaped dependence of N2O fluxes on soil moisture peaking at the intermediate soil moisture range are well-documented6,27. At intermediate soil moisture content, both oxic and anoxic microsites coexist, providing suitable environments for the two main microbial processes responsible for N2O production in soils: aerobic nitrification (oxidation of NH4+ via nitrite (NO2−) to NO3−, N2O as by-product) and anaerobic denitrification (reduction of NO3− and NO2− to gaseous N forms NO, N2O and N2)31.
Intermediate soil moisture content is also optimal for N mineralization (N release from organic matter as a result of microbial decomposition), which is supressed by very wet or very dry soil conditions7. At permafrost thaw sites, liberation of mineral N species from permafrost directly at thaw enhances N availability in the short-term32,33, but in the long-term, post-thaw N mineralization is a more important mechanism of mineral N supply34. While there was no correlation between NH4+ content and N2O flux and only a weak positive correlation between NO3− content and N2O flux (R = 0.25, p < 0.05, n = 30), we found strong positive correlations between N2O emissions and net N mineralization (R = 0.68, p < 0.001, n = 30) and net nitrification rates (R = 0.68, p < 0.001, n = 30). The improved drainage and associated enhancement of nitrification (NO3– supply) was likely an important trigger for the substantial N2O release from post-thaw Yedoma.
On Kurungnakh the net N mineralization rates were higher in Yedoma revegetated with grasses than in bare freshly thawed Yedoma (Fig. 3b, Supplementary Table 3). The negative net N mineralization, i.e., net N immobilization, in freshly thawed Yedoma can be explained by high uptake of mineral N species into microbial biomass, exceeding the rate of N liberated from organic matter. In contrast, high net N transformation rates in revegetated Yedoma indicate that the microbial needs for mineral N are well met as a result of continued mineralization after thaw, which allows N2O emissions to occur even in the presence of plant N uptake. Even stronger net immobilization than in freshly thawed Yedoma was found in vegetated Holocene cover (Fig. 3b, Supplementary Table 3), suggesting limited N mineralization in this dry soil (WFPS 13 ± 6 %; Supplementary Table 1) with a high C/N ratio (38 vs. 14–15 in Yedoma; Supplementary Table 2)35. The increasing trend with post-thaw age was even stronger for net nitrification than for net mineralization (Fig. 3b, Supplementary Table 3).
Despite the fact that plants can effectively compete for N species with soil microbes and suppress N losses by inhibition of nitrification and denitrification processes36, plants may also promote soil N cycling processes. Rhizosphere priming37,38,39 is the term used for the summed effects of different mechanisms by which plants enhance SOM decomposition. These mechanisms include rhizospheric deposition of labile carbon compounds, which provide an easily available source of energy and C, and organic acids, which help to release protective organic-mineral associations, as well as the effect of roots on soil aggregation. Positive priming of N mineralization has been previously reported in high-latitude ecosystems40,41 and in nutrient-rich croplands grown with perennial grasses42. In our study, there was a tendency towards higher gross N mineralization rate in Yedoma revegetated with grasses compared to freshly thawed Yedoma (Fig. 3b). Also, the positive correlations between N2O emissions with C content (R = 0.52, p = 0.05, n = 15), N content (R = 0.60, p = 0.02, n = 15) and CO2 fluxes (ecosystem respiration; R = 0.41, p = 0.002, n = 55) in the optimal moisture range of WFPS 45–85% suggest that plant-derived organics might stimulate N cycling processes at the Kurungnakh exposure. Additionally, grasses may have caused changes in the soil porosity and macropore structure that favor N2O production43,44. However, it is difficult to separate the plant effects on N2O emissions from the effects of moisture changes. Similarly, the increase in ecosystem respiration rates with slope stabilization and revegetation was observed in both exposures (Supplementary Fig. 6b, Supplementary Table 1), reflecting the joint effect of drying and increased plant C input, which cannot be distinguished from each other at this stage.
Changes in microbial community composition related to N cycling and N2O production
By using a targeted metagenomics tool designed to capture the genes responsible for key functions of the N cycle (Ref. 45; see Methods), we here reveal another important mechanism driving the increase in N2O emissions with time after thaw: changes in microbial community composition. We observed significant changes across the Yedoma exposure in the relative abundance of nitrification and denitrification genes with time passed after thaw, associated drainage and plant colonization (Fig. 4, Supplementary Fig. 8). These changes occurred within just a couple of years and led to strikingly different microbial community structure related to N cycling in thawed Yedoma compared to the Holocene cover deposits that feature well-developed cryosols prevailing in the region. The sparse studies that have previously reported changes in N cycling genes associated with permafrost thaw are in line with our findings here: Significant increases in denitrification genes (norB, nirS, nosZ) have been observed following thaw30,46.
In detail, we found an increase in the relative abundance of the amoA gene (first step of nitrification) from all the captured genes from 0.6% in freshly thawed Yedoma to 2.5–3.5% in revegetated Yedoma surfaces (Fig. 4). These results were supported by increasing copy numbers of bacterial and total (archaeal + bacterial) amoA gene with time after thaw (Supplementary Fig. 7). At the same time, the proportion of the nir genes (nirK + nirS) contributing to N2O production doubled from 15% to 29% in Yedoma revegetated with grasses, which was further coupled with halved proportion of the nosZ gene (catalyzing the reduction of N2O into N2; Fig. 4). These opposite trends in nir and nosZ genes resulted in a significant increase of the (nirK + nirS)/nosZ ratio, a commonly used indicator of N2O production potential in soils (Fig. 4), which was shown to increase with permafrost thaw in mineral upland soils30. Vegetated Holocene cover had the lowest relative abundances of amoA and nir, and the highest relative abundance of nosZ among all studied soils, which together explain the low N2O emissions there.
In addition to the above-mentioned denitrification genes, also the relative abundance of the nrfA gene encoding nitrite reduction to ammonia was very low in vegetated Holocene cover (0.4%), intermediate in bare Yedoma (1.7–1.8%) and highest in revegetated Yedoma (2.0–3.2%; Supplementary Fig. 9). The nrfA gene is a key functional gene in dissimilatory NO3− reduction to ammonium (DNRA), and its increasing abundance with post-thaw age reflects the improved availability of NO2– from nitrification. The norB gene responsible for nitric oxide (NO) reduction to N2O did not show similar gradual increase from bare to revegetated Yedoma sites as other nitrification and denitrification genes (Supplementary Fig. 9). This might be a result of a methodological bias: since norB has been less studied than nir and nosZ47, the gene databases used for developing the probe capture tool are not including enough probe diversity for norB to cover Arctic variants. Also, the nitric oxide reductase encoded by norB has a role in detoxification of NO, giving this enzyme a broader importance than just catalyzing an intermediate step of the denitrification pathway48.
To test whether the low N2O production in bare freshly thawed Yedoma was not merely a consequence of the high water-saturation, we dried the soil (25% reduction in the water content) and repeated the incubation under oxic and anoxic conditions with and without acetylene addition (see Methods). Drying indeed caused a 6-fold increase in N2O production under oxic treatment from the initial very low production rate (Wilcoxon signed-rank test, p = 0.03; Supplementary Fig. 10). Under anoxic treatment, drying with and without C addition even reduced the N2O production (p = 0.01). But, when we amended the soil with NO3− in addition to C, the N2O production increased drastically in all three headspace treatments (725, 12 and 379-fold in oxic treatment, anoxic treatment and anoxic treatment with acetylene, respectively; p = 0.01). This shows that even after creating favorable conditions for nitrification by drying, N2O production in anoxic conditions was still limited by NO3− due to the low abundance of ammonia oxidizers. Taken together, our results represent clear in situ evidence for the microbial limitation of N cycle and N2O emissions from thawing Yedoma permafrost due to low abundance of ammonia oxidizers, confirming the findings of a recent laboratory incubation study, which discovered this phenomenon49.
Similarly to ammonia oxidizers in the present study and in the earlier laboratory study49, it has been shown previously that also methanogens represent a bottle-neck in Yedoma permafrost biogeochemistry:50 a small part of the microbial community carrying out an important function associated to permafrost-climate feedbacks. On the studied Yedoma exposures, the low CH4 emissions from bare freshly thawed Yedoma (<0.5 mg C m−2 day−1) despite the high water saturation suggest that also there methane production was limited by lack of methanogenic archaea (Supplementary Fig. 6, Supplementary Table 1). Most of the studied soils showed minor CH4 emission or consumption rates (Supplementary Table 1), and even the highest median CH4 emission 1.95 mg C m−2 day−1, observed in revegetated yedoma with mosses in Kurungnakh, was modest compared to the emissions from polygonal wetlands (2–35 mg C m−2 day−1)51 and small ponds (4–35 mg C m−2 day−1)52 in the same region. Lack of recovery of methanogenic function with post-thaw age is easy to explain with drying associated with slope stabilization at such Yedoma exposures19, which creates unfavorable conditions for anaerobic methanogens.
At the same time, our results demonstrate that although N2O production in recently thawed Yedoma permafrost is restricted by the microbial community composition, retrogressive thaw slumps provide ideal conditions for the development of active N2O producing microbial community, leading to high N2O release within less than a decade. This highlights that short-term laboratory experiments indicating microbial limitations in the C and N cycles of permafrost soils 49,50 do not well represent the real changes in microbial community and their functioning with time.
N losses from thawing Yedoma permafrost and their implications
We show here that thawing Yedoma exposures host sites with optimal conditions for intense microbial N cycling and associated N2O production. Although N2O emissions may decrease with further slope stabilization as a result of continuous N losses and establishment of full vegetation cover30, the retrogressive thaw at the same time keeps releasing fresh sediments, rich in N available for microbial activities. According to our remote sensing analysis using ArcticDEM and UAV data, the Yedoma cliff of Kurungnakh retreated in 2012–2019 as a result of permafrost thaw at a rate of 3.7 (2.5–5.7) m year−1 (median with (25th–75th percentiles); Supplementary Figs. 3 & 4; see Methods section for details). Based on typical ice content of Yedoma deposits and the total N content of freshly thawed permafrost, we could estimate that this retrogressive thaw liberated at the thaw front as much as 1.7 kg of total N per m2 per year, which was associated with a release of 39 g of mineral N per m2 per year (see Methods section for details). These are remarkably high amounts of added N compared to the main pathways of external N input in high-latitude ecosystems: biological N fixation of 20–200 mg N m−2 year−1 53 and atmospheric N deposition of <200–300 mg N m−2 year−1 54. The additional N from Yedoma permafrost will have important consequences for plant growth and associated C fixation55, lateral N losses to waterbodies20,56 and gaseous N losses to the atmosphere34, and importantly N2O fluxes, as shown here.
In parallel to the retrogressive thaw front, the zone with optimal conditions for high N2O emissions on the middle part of the slope will likely shift spatially but persist as an active zone along this retreating Yedoma shore. Based on the emissions from disturbed Yedoma revegetated with grasses on Kurungnakh (median multiplied with a snow-free-season-length of 100 days), we estimated that under these optimal conditions thawed Yedoma will lose 54.8 mg N m−2 of N2O to the atmosphere just in one year. This corresponds to 0.14% of the mineral N originally liberated at the permafrost thaw front from a similar area in a year (see above). This is seven times lower than the IPCC N2O emission factor for N fertilization in managed mineral soils (1%)57, but still high considering that it occurs in a pristine northern soil, which are generally N limited28.
While it is important to remember that such high N2O emissions will occur in particular settings (Yedoma exposed to surface, suitable moisture content, sufficient time after thaw for establishment of N2O producing microbial community), these conditions are not limited to the retrogressive thaw slumps along rivers studied here. Similar disturbed N-rich Yedoma with successional plant cover are widespread along thermokarst lake shores, coasts, slopes, and valleys across the Yedoma region (Supplementary Fig. 11). Widespread occurrence of such landforms suggests that our findings are the first indication for substantial N2O emissions over large areas in the Arctic. We show that N liberated from this ancient permafrost during thaw is highly available for mineralization and further microbial activities. With rapid Arctic warming and associated permafrost thaw, the huge N resources contained in Yedoma will become increasingly available with important implications on ecosystem functioning and climate feedbacks at local to global scales.
Nitrous oxide fluxes were studied at two study sites located in Northeast Siberia, Russia: the Kurungnakh exposure (N 72°20’, E 126°17’), located on Kurungnakh-Sise Island in the Lena River Delta and the Duvanny Yar exposure (68°38’ N, 159°09’ E), located by the Kolyma River (Fig. 1). Both study regions are underlain by continuous permafrost, and the climate is continental Arctic with mean annual air temperature of –12.3 °C and −11 °C and annual rainfall amounts to 169 mm and 197 mm in Kurungnakh and Duvanny Yar, respectively58,59,60. More information about the climatic conditions in the region, depositional characteristics and vegetation can be found in Supplementary Note 1 and the references therein. Altogether, the following surfaces types were chosen for the study (n = 5–10): 1) vegetated Holocene cover deposits overlying undisturbed Yedoma permafrost on the top of the exposure; 2) freshly thawed Yedoma bare of vegetation, close to thawing ice-wedges in the upper part of the exposure; 3) earlier thawed Yedoma bare of vegetation; 4) disturbed Yedoma in the lower, stabilized parts of the slope, revegetated by mosses; 5) disturbed Yedoma revegetated by grasses; and, only on Kurungnakh, 6) bare sand close to the river shore receiving Yedoma melt-waters by a small stream running through the exposure (Supplementary Figs. 1 & 2).
In situ N2O fluxes
In situ nitrous oxide (N2O) fluxes were measured by the static chamber technique22, twice in July 2016 on Kurungnakh and once in July 2017 in Duvanny Yar (see Supplementary Note 1). Five gas samples were drawn from the chamber headspace within a 50-minute enclosure time and transferred into pre-evacuated 12 ml glass vials (Labco) for storage until the analysis. Soil temperature and moisture as volumetric water content (VWC) were recorded in the vicinity of the chamber. The N2O mixing ratios were determined with a gas chromatograph (GC; Agilent 7890B Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA, USA) equipped with an autosampler (Gilson Inc., WI, Middleton, USA), an electron capture detector (ECD) for N2O and a flame ionization detector (FID) for CH4. Fluxes of N2O were calculated from the slope of the linear increase of the N2O mixing ratio in the chamber headspace as a function of time. Besides initial visual inspection, the quality control of gas flux results was based on inspection of Root Mean Square Error (RMSE) in ppm (RMSE > 3 * SD) as compared to the variability of standard gas mixtures in a similar range. Methane (CH4) fluxes were obtained from the same chamber measurements as the N2O fluxes. Carbon dioxide (CO2) fluxes in the dark including the plants (ecosystem respiration) were measured with the dynamic chamber technique61 using an infrared gas analyzer (Li-840, LiCor Lincoln, Nebraska, USA in Kurungnakh; EGM-4, PP Systems, Amesbury, MA, USA in Duvanny Yar).
Soil sampling and analysis
Soil samples were taken from the topsoil (0–10 cm), cleaned from stones and roots and homogenized by sieving (mineral soils; 5 mm mesh size) or by hand-mixing (organic soils). Bulk density was determined from volumetric soil samples after drying until constant weight at 60 or 105 °C for organic and mineral soils, respectively. Particle density was determined by a pycnometric method. Total content of C, organic C and N, as well as δ13C of SOC and δ15N in the bulk soil were analyzed with an elemental analyzer (Thermo Finnigan Flash EA 1112 Series, San Jose, CA, USA). For organic C analysis, inorganic C was removed from a subsample with the acid fumigation method62. Water-filled pore space (WFPS) was calculated from VWC measured in situ, using bulk density and particle density determined as described above. Soil pH was measured from slurries with a soil:H2O ratio of 1:4 ratio (w/v). For determination of mineral N content, ammonium (NH4+) nitrate (NO3−) were extracted from freshly sampled soils at the field laboratory (1 M KCl, a 1:3 volume ratio of soil to extractant). The extracts were frozen for storage until the analysis by spectrophotometric methods as previously described61. See Supplementary Note 1 for further details about the soil analysis.
Gross and net N transformation rates
Nitrogen transformation rates were determined in the field laboratory from freshly sampled soils to imitate the processes occurring in the field during the flux measurements as realistically as possible. Due to time limitation and logistical challenges related to the fieldwork in Duvanny Yar, we did not measure N transformation rates from Duvanny Yar soils, but only from soils sampled in our primary study site Kurungnakh. For the determination of gross N mineralization and nitrification rates, we used the pool dilution method, which is based on labeling the product pool (NH4+ for mineralization, NO3− for nitrification) with the heavy N isotope 15N63,64,65. Due to the low mineral N content and high N immobilization, we were not able to determine gross nitrification in any of the studied soils and gross mineralization in some of the soils. However, even in these cases, we could use the data to calculate the net N mineralization and nitrification rates as described below.
In brief, two sets of samples (2 g of fresh soil) were prepared for both N mineralization and nitrification measurements. We added 500 μl of 0.25 mM, 10 at-% (15NH4)2SO4 solution to the N mineralization samples, and 500 μl of 0.50 mM, 10 at-% K15NO3 solution for nitrification samples. This N addition amounted to 2.1–2.6 mg N (kg DW)−1 depending on the soil moisture content. After labeling, the samples were incubated for 24 h at the approximate in situ temperature of ~5 °C. Nutrient levels (NO3− and NH4+) were determined from samples extracted at two-time points of 4 and 24 h with 2 M KCl as described above. Content of 15N in NH4+ extracts was analyzed by continuous-flow isotope ratio mass spectrometer (IRMS; Thermo Finnigan DELTA XPPlus, San Jose, CA, USA) coupled to an elemental analyzer (Thermo Finnigan Flash EA 1112 Series) and an open split interface (Thermo Finnigan Conflow III) after conversion to solid phase by the microdiffusion method as previously described22. Net N mineralization rates were calculated by dividing the difference of the total mineral N content (NH4+ and NO3−) between the first and second sampling points with the incubation time. Net ammonification and nitrification rates were calculated similarly from the change in NH4+ and NO3− contents, respectively.
N2O production and total denitrification rates in laboratory incubations
Experiment 1: Nitrous oxide production under different headspace conditions
Rates of N2O production and total denitrification were determined by incubation experiments from soils sampled in Kurungnakh, our primary study site (See above in Gross and net N transformation rates). The soils were kept frozen during storage and shipment to the laboratory, thawed, homogenized by hand, and further stored at 4 °C. After three days of acclimatization at the incubation temperature, the soil samples (10 and 25 g fresh weight for organic and mineral soils, respectively; n = 5) were incubated at field moisture content at 10 °C under three different headspace treatments: 1) oxic, 2) anoxic and 3) anoxic with acetylene. For oxic treatment (1), laboratory air was used as headspace. For anoxic treatments with and without acetylene (2 and 3), the flasks were closed inside a glove bag after flushing several times with N2 gas (purity ≥ 99.999%). Acetylene was added into the third treatment at 10 vol-% to block the last step of denitrification, reduction of N2O to N2, thus making N2O as the final denitrification product66. Gas samples were taken at five-time points at days 0, 1, 2, 3, and 6, and analysed for N2O mixing ratios with GC as described above. For oxic treatment, flux per mass of dry soil was calculated from the slope of a linear regression fitted to the first four sampling points with constant N2O production rate. For the anoxic treatments, we report the maximum N2O production between two sampling points, because we often observed N2O consumption (treatment 2 without acetylene) or steady state (treatment 3 with acetylene) after initial N2O production, indicating reduction of N2O to N2. See Supplementary Note 1 for more details about the incubation experiments.
Experiment 2: Response of nitrous oxide production to different moisture conditions and carbon and nitrogen sources
The aim of the second incubation experiment was to investigate the factors limiting N2O production in freshly thawed Yedoma. We dried the freshly thawed Yedoma to reduce the water content by 25%, weighed 17 g FW to incubation flasks, and incubated under three different headspace treatments as described above. For each headspace treatment, we applied three different amendments within a volume of 250 μl per flask: control (milli-Q H2O addition), addition of C (glucose; 67 μg C (g DW)−1, equal to 0.3% of SOC), or addition of C (as above) and NO3− (4.7 μg N (g DW)−1, equal to 0.3% of TN). The GC analysis and calculation followed the procedure described above for Experiment 1.
Molecular studies on microbial community participating in N cycling
For molecular studies, we sampled five surface types in the primary study site Kurungnakh (n = 3). The studied surfaces represented different stages of thermokarst and post-thaw succession: vegetated Holocene cover, freshly or earlier thawed Yedoma, revegetated Yedoma with mosses or with grasses. We extracted DNA from these samples in three technical replicates as described previously67, see Supplementary Note 1 for details.
Quantitative PCR (qPCR) of archaeal and bacterial amoA and 16S rRNA genes was performed using the reaction and cycling conditions as described previously and summarized in Supplementary Table 567,68,69,70. All reactions were performed in duplicates. The specificity of qPCR amplification products was verified by melting-curve analysis and gel electrophoresis.
To detect the changes in N cycling-relevant microbial community structure with permafrost thaw and post-thaw succession, we studied the relative abundances of the key N cycling genes using a captured metagenomic tool. The method has been validated and tested for overall performance and specificity of the probes used for sequence capture45, and it has been successfully applied for studying N cycling genes in bioreactors treating aquaculture effluents71. This method is designed for targeting and sequencing the organisms carrying the key N cycling genes involved in the following processes: N2 fixation (nifH), nitrification (amoA), NO3− reduction (narG, napA), denitrification (nir (nirK + nirS), norB, nosZ), dissimilatory nitrate reduction to ammonium (DNRA) (nrfA) and anammox (hdhA) using gene-specific probes following the NimbleGen SeqCap EZ protocol by Roche NimbleGen, Inc. A detailed description of the method can be found in Supplementary Note 1.
All statistical analyses were conducted with R, version 3.6.172. We used histograms, Q-Q plots and the Shapiro-Wilk normality test for testing normal distribution of the data. Differences in N2O fluxes, soil physicochemical characteristics and N transformation rates between the surface types were tested separately within each study site (fluxes, soil characteristics) or for each treatment (N2O production in soil incubations). For non-normally distributed data, we used the non-parametric Kruskall–Wallis test followed by pairwise comparisons with Dunn’s test of the FSA package73. For normally distributed data, we used Welch’s one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) followed by pairwise comparisons with the Games-Howell post hoc test of the userfriendlyscience package74. The equality of variances prior to ANOVA was tested with the Bartlett’s test. For testing the differences in molecular data (relative abundances, copy numbers & gene ratios; n = 3) between the studied soils the Kruskall–Wallis test with Dunn’s post hoc tests was also used. Treatment differences in the incubation experiments were tested with Wilcoxon signed-rank test. The role of soil characteristics, mineral N content and N transformation rates as drivers of in situ N2O fluxes was explored by the non-parametric Spearman correlation analysis with the Hmisc package75.
Rate and volume of thermal erosion and related N mobilization at the Kurungnakh exposure
We estimated the rate and volume of thermal erosion for the south-eastern part of the riverbank on Kurungnakh Island (length of the section 1.7 km) using Arctic DEM datasets from March 2012 (WorldView-1/WorldView-1 imagery) and April 2014 (WorldView-2/WorldView-2 imagery)76 and a digital elevation model (DEM) from unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) imaging from July 2019. The analysis was done in QGIS v 3.14 (with SAGA and GRASS). Detailed description of the method is available in Supplementary Note 1.
The calculation of the Yedoma retreat between 2012 and 2014 and 2014 and 2019 was based on the following steps: 1) Delineating the shoreline in 2019 based on digital elevation model (DEM) from UAV imaging in 2019; 2) delineating the Yedoma cliff boundary on the top of the exposure based on the DEM and orthophoto mosaic from UAV imaging in 2019, and 3) calculating distances between the shoreline and the cliff boundary 2019 and building intersection points for these lines with the cliff boundary determined from Arctic DEM datasets from March 2012 and April 2014. This algorithm resembles procedures that are available from the free AMBUR package77. Between 2012 and 2019 the Yedoma boundary retreated as a result of thermal erosion by 3.7 (2.5–5.7) m year−1 (median with 25th–75th percentiles). Then, we calculated the volume of eroded material along the studied cliff boundary from DEM difference (DEM-2019 subtracted from ArcticDEM-2014 and ArcticDEM-2012; the resulting value, if positive, means subsidence due to thaw and erosion). For this calculation, we used the ‘Raster surface volume instrument’ in QGIS. The resulting volume estimate is 223,502 m3.
We further approximated how much total and mineral N was annually liberated at the Kurungnakh exposure as a result of permafrost using the annually eroded volume per unit area, the total ground-ice content of 82 vol %14, and bulk density of 1.22 g cm−3, total N content of 0.16% and mineral N content of 35.3 mg N (kg DW)−1 detected in freshly thawed Yedoma in this study (Supplementary Table 2). This resulted in total N release from thawing permafrost at the Kurungnakh cliff boundary of 1.7 kg N m−2 year−1 and mineral N release as NH4+ of 39 g N m−2 year−1.
Huang, J. et al. Recently amplified arctic warming has contributed to a continual global warming trend. Nat. Clim. Change 7, 875–879 (2017).
Biskaborn, B. K. et al. Permafrost is warming at a global scale. Nat. Commun. 10, 264–11 (2019).
Turetsky, M. R. et al. Permafrost collapse is accelerating carbon release. Nature 569, 32–34 (2019).
Hugelius, G. et al. Estimated stocks of circumpolar permafrost carbon with quantified uncertainty ranges and identified data gaps. Biogeosciences 11, 6573–6593 (2014).
Hugelius, G. et al. Large stocks of peatland carbon and nitrogen are vulnerable to permafrost thaw. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 117, 20438–20446 (2020).
Voigt, C. et al. Nitrous oxide emissions from permafrost-affected soils. Nat. Rev. Earth Environ. 1, 420–434 (2020).
Robinson, C. H. Controls on decomposition and soil nitrogen availability at high latitudes. Plant Soil 242, 65–81 (2002).
Grosse, G. et al. Vulnerability of high-latitude soil organic carbon in North America to disturbance. J. Geophys. Res. Biogeosci. 116, G00K06 (2011).
Zimov, S. A., Schuur, E. A. G. & Chapin, F. S. I. Permafrost and the global carbon budget. Science 312, 1612–1613 (2006).
Schuur, E. A. G. et al. Climate change and the permafrost carbon feedback. Nature 520, 171–179 (2015).
Myhre, G. et al. In Climate Change 2013: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (eds Stocker, T. F. et al.) 659–740 (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, NY, USA, 2013).
Ravishankara, A. R., Daniel, J. S. & Portmann, R. W. Nitrous Oxide (N2O): The Dominant Ozone-Depleting Substance Emitted in the 21st Century. Science 326, 123–125 (2009).
Tian, H. et al. A comprehensive quantification of global nitrous oxide sources and sinks. Nature 586, 248–256 (2020).
Strauss, J. et al. The deep permafrost carbon pool of the Yedoma region in Siberia and Alaska. Geophys. Res. Lett. 40, 6165–6170 (2013).
Strauss, J. et al. Deep Yedoma permafrost: A synthesis of depositional characteristics and carbon vulnerability. Earth-Sci. Rev. 172, 75–86 (2017).
Strauss, J. et al. Organic-matter quality of deep permafrost carbon - a study from Arctic Siberia. Biogeosciences 12, 2227–2245 (2015).
Weiss, N. et al. Thermokarst dynamics and soil organic matter characteristics controlling initial carbon release from permafrost soils in the Siberian Yedoma region. Sediment. Geol. 340, 38–48 (2016).
Nitzbon, J. et al. Fast response of cold ice-rich permafrost in northeast Siberia to a warming climate. Nat. Commun. 11 (2020).
Kanevskiy, M. et al. Patterns and rates of riverbank erosion involving ice-rich permafrost (yedoma) in northern Alaska. Geomorphology 253, 370–384 (2016).
Fuchs, M. et al. Rapid Fluvio-Thermal Erosion of a Yedoma Permafrost Cliff in the Lena River Delta. Front. Earth Sci. 8, 366 (2020).
Günther, F., Overduin, P. P., Sandakov, A. V., Grosse, G. & Grigoriev, M. N. Short- and long-term thermo-erosion of ice-rich permafrost coasts in the Laptev Sea region. Biogeosciences 10, 4297–4318 (2013).
Marushchak, M. E. et al. Hot spots for nitrous oxide emissions found in different types of permafrost peatlands. Glob. Chang. Biol. 17, 2601–2614 (2011).
Chapuis-Lardy, L., Wrage, N., Metay, A., Chotte, J. & Bernoux, M. Soils, a sink for N2O? A review. Glob. Chang. Biol. 13, 1–17 (2007).
Brummell, M. E., Farrell, R. E., Hardy, S. P. & Siciliano, S. D. Greenhouse gas production and consumption in High Arctic deserts. Soil Biol. Biochem. 68, 158–165 (2014).
Wagner, I., Hung, J. K. Y., Neil, A. & Scott, N. A. Net greenhouse gas fluxes from three High Arctic plant communities along a moisture gradient. Arct. Sci. 5, 185–201 (2019).
Butterbach-Bahl, K., Baggs, E. M., Dannenmann, M., Kiese, R. & Zechmeister-Boltenstern, S. Nitrous oxide emissions from soils: how well do we understand the processes and their controls? Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B-Biol. Sci. 368, 20130122 (2013).
Pärn, J. et al. Nitrogen-rich organic soils under warm well-drained conditions are global nitrous oxide emission hotspots. Nat. Commun. 9, 1135 (2018).
Nadelhoffer, K., Giblin, A. E., Shaver, G. R. & Laundre, J. A. Effects of Temperature and Substrate Quality on Element Mineralization in 6 Arctic Soils. Ecology 72, 242–253 (1991).
Repo, M. E. et al. Large N2O emissions from cryoturbated peat soil in tundra. Nat. Geosci. 2, 189–192 (2009).
Yang, G. et al. Magnitude and Pathways of Increased Nitrous Oxide Emissions from Uplands Following Permafrost Thaw. Environ. Sci. Technol. 52, 9162–9169 (2018).
Bateman, E. J. & Baggs, E. M. Contributions of nitrification and denitrification to N2O emissions from soils at different water-filled pore space. Biol. Fertil. Soils 41, 379–388 (2005).
Keuper, F. et al. A frozen feast: thawing permafrost increases plant-available nitrogen in subarctic peatlands. Glob. Chang. Biol. 18, 1998–2007 (2012).
Beermann, F. et al. Permafrost Thaw and Liberation of Inorganic Nitrogen in Eastern Siberia. Permafr. Periglac. Process 28, 605–618 (2017).
Voigt, C. et al. Increased nitrous oxide emissions from Arctic peatlands after permafrost thaw. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 114, 6238–6243 (2017).
Liu, Y. et al. A global synthesis of the rate and temperature sensitivity of soil nitrogen mineralization: latitudinal patterns and mechanisms. Glob. Chang. Biol. 23, 455–464 (2017).
Moreau, D., Bardgett, R. D., Finlay, R. D., Jones, D. L. & Philippot, L. A plant perspective on nitrogen cycling in the rhizosphere. Funct. Ecol. 33, 540–552 (2019).
Kuzyakov, Y., Friedel, J. K. & Stahr, K. Review of mechanisms and quantification of priming effects. Soil Biol. Biochem. 32, 1485–1498 (2000).
Keuper, F. et al. Carbon loss from northern circumpolar permafrost soils amplified by rhizosphere priming. Nat. Geosci. 13, 560–565 (2020).
Cheng, W. et al. Synthesis and modeling perspectives of rhizosphere priming. N. Phytol. 201, 31 (2013).
Dijkstra, F. A., Bader, N. E., Johnson, D. W. & Cheng, W. Does accelerated soil organic matter decomposition in the presence of plants increase plant N availability? Soil Biol. Biochem. 41, 1080–1087 (2009).
Rousk, K., Michelsen, A. & Rousk, J. Microbial control of soil organic matter mineralization responses to labile carbon in subarctic climate change treatments. Glob. Chang. Biol. 22, 4150–4161 (2016).
Henneron, L., Kardol, P., Wardle, D. A., Cros, C. & Fontaine, S. Rhizosphere control of soil nitrogen cycling: a key component of plant economic strategies. N. Phytol. 228, 1269 (2020).
Parry, S., Renault, P., Chenu, C. & Lensi, R. Denitrification in pasture and cropped soil clods as affected by pore space structure. Soil Biol. Biochem. 31, 493–501 (1991).
Kravchenko, A. N. et al. X-ray computed tomography to predict soil N2O production via bacterial denitrification and N2O emission in contrasting bioenergy cropping systems. GCB Bioenergy 10, 894–909 (2018).
Siljanen, H. et al. Captured metagenomics on inorganic nitrogen and methane cycling reveals relative abundance and diversity of functional genes. Unpublished; preprint available at URL https://www.dropbox.com/s/uucgyrniwxyb95q/Siljanen_2019b_in-prep_Capture_C-N_metagenomics_MS.pdf?dl=0 (2019).
Mackelprang, R. et al. Metagenomic analysis of permafrost microbial community response to thaw. Nature 480, 368 (2011).
Banerjee, S. & Siciliano, S. D. Spatially tripartite interactions of denitrifiers in arctic ecosystems: activities, functional groups and soil resources. Environ. Microbiol 14, 2601–2613 (2012).
Kuypers, M. M. M., Marchant, H. K. & Kartal, B. The microbial nitrogen-cycling network. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 16, 263–276 (2018).
Monteux, S. et al. Carbon and nitrogen cycling in Yedoma permafrost controlled by microbial functional limitations. Nat. Geosci. 13, 794 (2020).
Knoblauch, C., Beer, C., Liebner, S., Grigoriev, M. N. & Pfeiffer, E. Methane production as key to the greenhouse gas budget of thawing permafrost. Nat. Clim. Chang. 8, 309–312 (2018).
Kutzbach, L., Wagner, D. & Pfeiffer, E. Effect of Microrelief and Vegetation on Methane Emission from Wet Polygonal Tundra, Lena Delta, Northern Siberia. Biogeochemistry 69, 341–362 (2004).
Knoblauch, C., Spott, O., Evgrafova, S., Kutzbach, L. & Pfeiffer, E. Regulation of methane production, oxidation, and emission by vascular plants and bryophytes in ponds of the northeast Siberian polygonal tundra. Journal of Geophysical Research. Biogeosciences 120, 2525–2541 (2015).
Stewart, K. J., Grogan, P., Coxson, D. S. & Siciliano, S. D. Topography as a key factor driving atmospheric nitrogen exchanges in arctic terrestrial ecosystems. Soil Biol. Biochem. 70, 96–112 (2014).
Bobbink, R. et al. Global assessment of nitrogen deposition effects on terrestrial plant diversity: a synthesis. Ecol. Appl. 20, 30–59 (2010).
Kicklighter, D. W., Melillo, J. M., Monier, E., Sokolov, A. P. & Zhuang, Q. Future nitrogen availability and its effect on carbon sequestration in Northern Eurasia. Nat. Commun. 10, 3024 (2019).
Abbott, B. W., Jones, J. B., Godsey, S. E., Larouche, J. R. & Bowden, W. B. Patterns and persistence of hydrologic carbon and nutrient export from collapsing upland permafrost. Biogeosciences 12, 3725–3740 (2015).
IPCC. In 2006 IPCC Guidelines for National Greenhouse Gas Inventories (eds Eggleston, S. et al.) 11 (Cambridge University Press, 2006).
Boike, J. et al. A 16-year record (2002-2017) of permafrost, active-layer, and meteorological conditions at the Samoylov Island Arctic permafrost research site, Lena River delta, northern Siberia: an opportunity to validate remote-sensing data and land surface, snow, and permafrost models. Earth Syst. Sci. Data 11, 261–299 (2019).
Göckede, M. et al. Shifted energy fluxes, increased Bowen ratios, and reduced thaw depths linked with drainage-induced changes in permafrost ecosystem structure. Cryosphere 11, 2975–2996 (2017).
Morgenstern, A., Grosse, G., Guenther, F., Fedorova, I. & Schirrmeister, L. Spatial analyses of thermokarst lakes and basins in Yedoma landscapes of the Lena Delta. Cryosphere 5, 849–867 (2011).
Voigt, C. et al. Warming of subarctic tundra increases emissions of all three important greenhouse gases - carbon dioxide, methane, and nitrous oxide. Glob. Chang. Biol. 23, 3121–3138 (2017).
Ramnarine, R., Voroney, R. P., Wagner-Riddle, C. & Dunfield, K. E. Carbonate removal by acid fumigation for measuring the δ13C of soil organic carbon. Can. J. Soil Sci. 91, 247–250 (2011).
Kirkham, D. & Bartholomew, W. V. Equations for Following Nutrient Transformations in Soil, Utilizing Tracer Data I. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 18, 33 (1954).
Kirkham, D. & Bartholomew, W. V. Equations for Following Nutrient Transformations in Soil, Utilizing Tracer Data: II. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 18, 33 (1955).
Booth, MaryS., Stark, JohnM. & Rastetter, Edward Controls on Nitrogen Cycling in Terrestrial Ecosystems: A Synthetic Analysis of Literature Data. Ecol. Monogr. 75, 139–157 (2005).
Klemedtsson, L., Svensson, B. H. & Rosswall, T. A Method of Selective-Inhibition to Distinguish between Nitrification and Denitrification as Sources of Nitrous-Oxide in Soil. Biol. Fertil. Soils 6, 112–119 (1988).
Siljanen, H. M. P. et al. Archaeal nitrification is a key driver of high nitrous oxide emissions from arctic peatlands. Soil Biol. Biochem. 137, UNSP 107539 (2019).
Leininger, S. et al. Archaea predominate among ammonia-oxidizing prokaryotes in soils. Nature 442, 806–809 (2006).
Rotthauwe, J. H., Witzel, K. P. & Liesack, W. The ammonia monooxygenase structural gene amoA as a functional marker: Molecular fine-scale analysis of natural ammonia-oxidizing populations. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 63, 4704–4712 (1997).
Muyzer, G., Dewaal, E. C. & Uitterlinden, A. G. Profiling of Complex Microbial-Populations by Denaturing Gradient Gel-Electrophoresis Analysis of Polymerase Chain Reaction-Amplified Genes-Coding for 16s Ribosomal-Rna. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 59, 695–700 (1993).
Aalto, S. L. et al. Nitrate removal microbiology in woodchip bioreactors: A case-study with full-scale bioreactors treating aquaculture effluents. Sci. Total Environ. 723, 138093 (2020).
R Core Team. R-3.6.1 for Windows (32/64 bit). (2019).
Ogle, D., Wheeler, P. & Dinno, A. FSA: Simple Fisheries Stock Assessment Methods. R package version 0.7.2 (2020).
Peters, G., Verboon, P. & Green, J. userfriendlyscience: Quantitative Analysis Made Accessible. R package version 0.7.2 (2018).
Harrell, F. E. Jr Hmisc: Harrell Miscellaneous. R. package version 4, 4–1 (2020).
Porter, C. et al. ArcticDEM. Harvard Dataverse, V1, January 2021, https://doi.org/10.7910/DVN/OHHUKH (2018).
Jackson, C. W. Jr, Alexander, C. R. & Bush, D. M. Application of the AMBUR R package for spatio-temporal analysis of shoreline change: Jekyll Island, Georgia, USA. Comput. Geosci. 41, 199–207 (2012).
Marushchak, M. E. et al. Data related to article ‘Thawing Yedoma permafrost is a neglected nitrous oxide source’. Zenodo, https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5360646 (2021).
Strauss, J. et al. Database of Ice-Rich Yedoma Permafrost (IRYP). PANGAEA, https://doi.org/10.1594/PANGAEA.861733 (2016).
Obu, J. et al. Northern Hemisphere permafrost map based on TTOP modelling for 2000–2016 at 1 km2 scale. Earth-Sci. Rev. 193, 299–316 (2019).
We wish to acknowledge funding from the Academy of Finland in the frame of the projects Yedoma-N (no. 287469), NOCA (no. 314630) and the Atmosphere and Climate Competence Center (ACCC) (no. 337550). The work of M.E.M was additionally supported by PANDA (no. 317054), C.V. by MUFFIN (no. 332196) and H.M.P.S by AMOBORA (no. 290315) and NITROBIOME (no. 342362), all funded by the Academy of Finland. A.F. and N.L. by Russian Foundation for Basic Research project “Assessing the Circumpolar Balance of N2O” (18-55-11003 AF_t), C.K. by the BMBF project CarboPerm (no. 03G0836A) and G.G. and A.M. by BMBF KoPf Synthesis (03F0834B). Field support in the Lena Delta was provided in the framework of the joint Russian-German LENA expeditions. We are thankful for the personnel of the Research Station “Samoylov Island” and its operator - IPGG SB RAS, as well as for the personnel of the Northeast Science Station for invaluable support during the fieldwork. We acknowledge T. Trubnikova for important contribution to field logistics and laboratory assistance, N. Welti for fieldwork preparations, E.J. Wilcox for help in preparing Fig. 1., and C. Palacin-Lizarbe for valuable discussions.
The author declares no competing interests.
Peer review information
Nature Communications thanks Marcus Horn and the anonymous reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work. Peer reviewer reports are available.
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
About this article
Cite this article
Marushchak, M.E., Kerttula, J., Diáková, K. et al. Thawing Yedoma permafrost is a neglected nitrous oxide source. Nat Commun 12, 7107 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-021-27386-2
This article is cited by
Nature Communications (2022)