NLRP3 phosphorylation in its LRR domain critically regulates inflammasome assembly

Niu, Tingting; De Rosny, Charlotte; Chautard, Séverine; Rey, Amaury; Patoli, Danish; Groslambert, Marine; Cosson, Camille; Lagrange, Brice; Zhang, Zhirong; Visvikis, Orane; Hacot, Sabine; Hologne, Maggy; Walker, Olivier; Wong, Jeimin; Wang, Ping; Ricci, Roméo; Henry, Thomas; Boyer, Laurent; Petrilli, Virginie; Py, Bénédicte F.

doi:10.1038/s41467-021-26142-w

Download PDF

Article
Open access
Published: 06 October 2021

NLRP3 phosphorylation in its LRR domain critically regulates inflammasome assembly

Nature Communications volume 12, Article number: 5862 (2021) Cite this article

11k Accesses
48 Citations
7 Altmetric
Metrics details

Subjects

Abstract

NLRP3 controls the secretion of inflammatory cytokines IL-1β/18 and pyroptosis by assembling the inflammasome. Upon coordinated priming and activation stimuli, NLRP3 recruits NEK7 within hetero-oligomers that nucleate ASC and caspase-1 filaments, but the apical molecular mechanisms underlying inflammasome assembly remain elusive. Here we show that NEK7 recruitment to NLRP3 is controlled by the phosphorylation status of NLRP3 S803 located within the interaction surface, in which NLRP3 S803 is phosphorylated upon priming and later dephosphorylated upon activation. Phosphomimetic substitutions of S803 abolish NEK7 recruitment and inflammasome activity in macrophages in vitro and in vivo. In addition, NLRP3-NEK7 binding is also essential for NLRP3 deubiquitination by BRCC3 and subsequently inflammasome assembly, with NLRP3 phosphomimetic mutants showing enhanced ubiquitination and degradation than wildtype NLRP3. Finally, we identify CSNK1A1 as the kinase targeting NLRP3 S803. Our findings thus reveal NLRP3 S803 phosphorylation status as a druggable apical molecular mechanism controlling inflammasome assembly.

TRIM28 SUMOylates and stabilizes NLRP3 to facilitate inflammasome activation

Article Open access 09 August 2021

An update on the regulatory mechanisms of NLRP3 inflammasome activation

Article Open access 13 April 2021

Structural basis for the oligomerization-facilitated NLRP3 activation

Article Open access 07 February 2024

Introduction

Innate immunity constitutes a highly efficient barrier to diverse insults by rapidly detecting pathogens as well as tissue damage. The activation of pattern recognition receptors (PRRs) by pathogen- and damage-associated molecular patterns (PAMPs and DAMPs) leads to the early local detection of the insult and the production of pro-inflammatory cytokines. NLRP3 is a protective PRR against infections by highly diverse agents including viruses, bacteria, fungi and parasites. On the other side, NLRP3 activity is detrimental in several inflammatory conditions. Indeed, gain-of-function mutations in the NLRP3 gene cause Cryopyrin-associated periodic syndrome (CAPS) autoinflammation, and inappropriate activation of NLRP3 contributes to a number of multifactorial diseases including gouty arthritis, atherosclerosis, diabetes, neurodegenerative disorders, and ischemia-reperfusion insults¹. Upon activation, NLRP3 assembles a typical multimeric inflammasome complex comprising NEK7, the adapter ASC and the effector caspase-1. Caspase-1 then controls the cytosolic maturation of the pro-inflammatory cytokines IL-1β and IL-18, and processing of gasdermin D (GSDMD). Cleavage of GSDMD releases its N-terminal domain forming pores into the plasma membrane that mediate the release of mature cytokines and trigger pyroptosis leading to alarmin release.

The regulation of NLRP3 inflammasome assembly remains incompletely understood. The variety of conditions leading to NLRP3-dependent inflammation and the structural diversity of its known activators suggest that NLRP3 senses a common cell stress downstream of these conditions. NLRP3 is both regulated at the transcriptional and post-translational levels^2,3. In particular, NLRP3 activation requires the deubiquitination of its LRR domain by the JAMM domain-containing Zn²⁺ metalloprotease deubiquitinase (DUB) BRCC3⁴. Since this study, accumulative studies have pointed out the role of post-translational modifications of NLRP3 in its activation process, including modifications of the NLRP3 LRR domain. Indeed, in addition to BRCC3-mediated NLRP3 LRR deubiquitination, which is required for the inflammasome assembly, NLRP3 LRR has been shown to be ubiquitinated and targeted to degradation by FBXL2 at K689 (in mouse NLRP3 corresponding to K691 in human NLRP3) as well as by MARCH7 and RNF125. Reversely, ubiquitination of NLRP3 LRR domain by Pellino2 participates in NLRP3 priming^5,6,7,8. In addition to ubiquitination, the phosphorylation status of NLRP3 LRR domain regulates the inflammasome as PTPN22-mediated dephosphorylation at Y859 (in mouse NLRP3 corresponding to Y861 in human NLRP3) promotes its activation⁹. Most of the modified sites remain to be identified.

In this study, we analyzed the post-translational modifications of the NLRP3 LRR domain by mass spectrometry and identified serine 803 (S803) in mouse (S806 in human NLRP3) to be phosphorylated upon priming and dephosphorylated upon activation. S803 was critical for NLRP3 activation in human monocytes and mouse macrophages using reconstitution of NLRP3-deficient lines. Consistently, primary macrophages from Nlrp3^S803D/S803D knock-in (KI) mice bearing a phospho-mimetic substitution of S803 neither underwent pyroptosis nor secreted IL-1β and IL-18 in response to various inflammasome activators. S803D substitution impaired inflammasome assembly and caspase-1 processing and activation. Nlrp3^S803D/S803D KI mice were resistant to in vivo endotoxic shock. Further analysis of the mechanism revealed that, NLRP3 S803D failed to recruit NEK7 which constituted a prerequisite for BRCC3 recruitment upon activation. NLRP3 S803D was then found highly ubiquitinated and targeted to degradation. Lastly, combining bioinformatic analysis, siRNA screen and biochemistry assays, we identified the ubiquitous CSNK1A1 kinase as critical for NLRP3 phosphorylation at S803. Altogether, our results revealed phosphorylation at S803 as a critical upstream regulatory checkpoint in NLRP3 activation process.

Results

NLRP3 LRR is phosphorylated at S735, S806, and S1035

We used mass spectrometry in order to identify novel modification sites in the LRR domain of NLRP3 that could be linked to ubiquitination. 293T cells expressing Flag-NLRP3 LRR were treated with deubiquitinase inhibitor G5, proteasome inhibitor MG132 and lysosomal protease inhibitor E-64d to increase NLRP3 LRR ubiquitination level. Flag-NLRP3 LRR purified by anti-Flag immunoprecipitation (IP) was analyzed by SDS-PAGE followed by Western-blot (WB) (Supplementary Fig. 1a) and Coomassie staining (Fig. 1). Proteins in the gel sections containing Flag-NLRP3 LRR or the smear of ubiquitinated Flag-NLRP3 LRR were digested by trypsin, separated by reverse-phase ultra-high performance liquid chromatography and analyzed by mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS). We identified three ubiquitination sites K878, K927, and K973 (in human, corresponding to K875, T924, and K970 in mouse respectively) and three phosphorylation sites S735, S806, and S1035 (in human, corresponding to S733, S803, and S1032 in mouse respectively) (Table 1 and Supplementary Fig. 1b). Two of these ubiquitination sites and all identified phosphorylation sites were conserved across species and exposed at the surface of the LRR domain (Supplementary Fig. 1c, d).

**Fig. 1: NLRP3 is ubiquitinated at K878, K927, K973, and phosphorylated at S735, S806, S1035.**

Table 1 Identification of three ubiquitination sites and three phosphorylation sites by LC-MS/MS analysis by mass spectrometry.

Full size table

S806 is critical for NLRP3 inflammasome activation in human monocytes

In order to test the impact of these modifications on NLRP3 inflammasome activation, we used U937 human monocytes knocked-out for NLRP3 by Crispr/CAS9 and reconstituted them with doxycycline-inducible NLRP3 bearing substitutions of these sites (Supplementary Fig. 2a)¹⁰. K878R, K927R, or K973R substitutions of the three identified ubiquitinated lysines by arginines did not alter significantly IL-1β secretion in LPS-primed U937 treated with nigericin. These results suggested that ubiquitination of these lysines were not critical for NLRP3 inflammasome activation. In contrast, the analysis of the three phosphorylated serine sites showed that NLRP3 phospho-mimetic S806D fully abrogated IL-1β secretion in LPS-primed U937 treated with nigericin, while phospho-null or phospho-mimetic substitutions of S735 and S1035 showed no or poorly reproducible impacts on IL-1β secretion (Fig. 2a). As expected, all reconstituted U937 lines and wild-type (WT) U937 secreted equal amounts of TNF used as a control for NLRP3-independent signaling in response to LPS priming. Noteworthy, NLRP3 activity depends on NLRP3 LRR domain in this U937 reconstitution system matching endogenous NLRP3 expression level (Supplementary Fig. 2b). Follow-up on S806 substitutions confirmed that phospho-mimetic S806D and S806E mutants impaired mature IL-1β and IL-18 secretion and release of cleaved caspase-1 in LPS-primed U937 treated with nigericin, while phospho-null S806A mutant inhibited but did not abolish these responses (Fig. 2b, c). In addition, ASC speck formation was also impaired in LPS-primed U937 expressing NLRP3 S806D treated with nigericin (Fig. 2d). S806 substitutions impaired IL-1β and IL-18 secretion by U937 irrespectively of the LPS priming pathway used prior to nigericin treatment. Indeed, U937 expressing S806A, D, or E mutants primed with 10 min LPS treatment (non-transcriptional MyD88-dependent priming), with 30 min or 1 h LPS treatment (non-transcriptional TRIF-dependent priming), with 3 h LPS treatment (transcriptional priming) were impaired in IL-1β and IL-18 secretion (Supplementary Fig. 2c)¹¹. In addition, S806 substitutions impaired IL-1β and IL-18 secretion by U937 irrespectively of the nature of the priming signal as evidenced by priming cells with TLR2/6 ligand Pam3CSK4 prior to nigericin treatment (Supplementary Fig. 2d). S806 substitutions also impaired IL-1β and IL-18 secretion in LPS-primed U937 cells treated with particulates including monosodium urate (MSU) and silica (Supplementary Fig. 2e). On the opposite, LPS-primed U937 expressing NLRP3 S806A, D, or E mutants secreted IL-1β as WT U937 in response to infection by Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium (SL1344 strain) and transfection with poly(dA:dT), activating the NLRC4 and AIM2 inflammasomes respectively (Supplementary Fig. 2f, g). Altogether, these data showed that NLRP3 S806 phospho-null and phospho-mimetic mutants strongly impaired the NLRP3 inflammasome activation. We then monitored NLRP3 phosphorylation upon priming and activation of the inflammasome in reconstituted U937. While NLRP3 was not phosphorylated in basal condition, it got phosphorylated on serine upon priming with LPS, and further activation with nigericin strongly reduced this phosphorylation (Fig. 2e). No phosphorylation was detected in U937 reconstituted with NLRP3 S806A, indicating that S806 is critical in this priming-dependent phosphorylation. Consistently with this result, we did not detect the reported phosphorylation of NLRP3 S198 upon LPS priming (Supplementary Fig. 2h, i)¹².

**Fig. 2: S806 is critical for NLRP3 inflammasome activity in human U937 monocytes.**

S803 is critical for NLRP3 inflammasome activation in immortalized BMDMs

In parallel, we also tested the impact of these modifications in murine bone marrow-derived macrophages (BMDMs) by reconstituting immortalized BMDMs from Nlrp3^−/− mice with doxycycline-inducible mutants of murine NLRP3 (Supplementary Fig. 3a). Consistently with results obtained in U937 human cell lines, immortalized BMDMs expressing NLRP3 with substitutions of S733 or S1032 secreted IL-1β in response to LPS priming followed by activation with nigericin similarly as BMDMs expressing WT NLRP3 (Fig. 3a). In contrast, S803A, S803D, and S803E substitutions fully abolished IL-1β secretion in LPS-primed immortalized BMDMs treated with nigericin or extracellular ATP confirming that S803 is critical for NLRP3 activity (Fig. 3a, b). Noteworthy, NLRP3 S803A mutant showed no residual activity in mouse immortalized BMDMs as opposite to the corresponding NLRP3 S806A substitution in human U937 line, suggesting some species-dependent pathway. Similarly as in U937, NLRP3 activity depends on NLRP3 LRR domain in this BMDM reconstitution system matching endogenous NLRP3 expression level (Supplementary Fig. 3b). As expected, LPS-primed immortalized BMDMs expressing S803A, S803D or S803E mutants secreted equal amounts of IL-1β as compared to BMDMs expressing WT NLRP3 upon S. Typhimurium SL1344 infection or transfection with flagellin activating the NLRC4 inflammasome, as well as upon transfection with poly(dA:dT) activating the AIM2 inflammasome (Supplementary Fig. 3b–d).

**Fig. 3: S803 is critical for NLRP3 inflammasome activity in immortalized BMDMs.**

NLRP3 S803D mutant is defective for inflammasome assembly in primary BMDMs

We generated Nlrp3^S803D/S803D KI mice by Crispr/CAS9 (Supplementary Fig. 4a, b). Primary BMDMs from Nlrp3^S803D/S803D mice were totally impaired in IL-1β and IL-18 secretion when primed with LPS and activated by ATP, nigericin, LLOMe or MSU. They did not undergo pyroptosis upon LPS and nigericin treatment (Fig. 4a, b). BMDMs from Nlrp3^S803D/+ mice showed an intermediate phenotype. As a control, LPS-induced TNF secretion was identical in all BMDMs. LPS-primed Nlrp3^S803D/+ BMDMs treated with nigericin secreted similar amount of IL-1β and IL-18 than Nlrp3^+/− BMDMs, confirming the loss-of-function of the Nlrp3^S803D allele (Supplementary Fig. 4c). Nlrp3^S803D/S803D BMDM phenotype was independent of the nature of the priming signal, as similar results were obtained when Pam3CSK4-primed BMDMs were treated with nigericin (Supplementary Fig. 4d). Consistently, no mature IL-1β and cleaved caspase-1 could be observed by WB in the supernatants of Nlrp3^S803D/S803D BMDMs primed with LPS and activated with nigericin (Fig. 4c). In addition, nigericin did not trigger caspase-1 activity in LPS-primed Nlrp3^S803D/S803D BMDMs as monitored by staining with FLICA fluorescent caspase-1 substrate (Fig. 4d). We next tested whether Nlrp3^S803D/S803D BMDMs were impaired in the assembly of the NLRP3 inflammasome, and indeed ASC did not form oligomers in LPS-primed Nlrp3^S803D/S803D BMDMs treated with nigericin, and no ASC speck could be observed (Fig. 4e, f). In addition, NLRP3 S803D did not co-immunoprecipitate with ASC in Nlrp3^S803D/S803D BMDMs treated with LPS and nigericin (Fig. 4g). Consistently, LPS-primed Nlrp3^S803D/S803D BMDMs infected with Escherichia coli, or Pam3CSK4-primed Nlrp3^S803D/S803D BMDMs transfected with LPS, did not secrete IL-1β which relies on the NLRP3 inflammasome, but underwent pyroptosis which depends in both settings on the caspase-11 non-canonical inflammasome (Supplementary Fig. 4e, f). As controls, LPS-primed Nlrp3^S803D/S803D BMDMs secreted IL-1β in response to S. Typhimurium infection or flagellin transfection both activating the NLRC4 inflammasome (Supplementary Fig. 4g, h). In addition, LPS-primed Nlrp3^S803D/S803D BMDMs secreted IL-1β and underwent pyroptosis in response to poly(dA:dT) transfection which activates the AIM2 inflammasome (Supplementary Fig. 4i).

**Fig. 4: S803 is critical for NLRP3 inflammasome activity in primary BMDMs.**

NLRP3 S803D does not recruit NEK7

We next investigated the mechanism of inflammasome blockade by NLRP3 S803 phospho-mimetic substitutions. NEK7 has been shown to be a key component of the NLRP3 inflammasome that interacts and bridges adjacent NLRP3 subunits^13,14,15,16. We confirmed that NEK7 was indeed required for NLRP3 activity in our experimental settings (Supplementary Fig. 5a). As S803 is localized at the interaction surface with NEK7 (Supplementary Fig. 5b), we tested whether S803D substitution may interfere with this recruitment. Indeed, NLRP3 co-immunoprecipitation with NEK7 was abolished in Nlrp3^S803D/S803D BMDMs activated with LPS and nigericin (Fig. 5a). We confirmed these results in human U937 monocytes in which phospho-mimetic S806D substitution, but not phospho-null S806A, impaired NEK7 recruitment upon LPS and nigericin treatment (Fig. 5b). NLRP3 S806D substitution similarly blocked NEK7/NLRP3 co-immunoprecipitation in HeLa cells ectopically expressing NLRP3 (Supplementary Fig. 5c). As these overexpression settings bypassed upstream regulations of the inflammasome assembly, we concluded that the phospho-mimetic substitution S806D impacted directly the ability of NLRP3 and NEK7 to interact by modifying the interaction surface. As a control for the correct folding of the LRR domain, we tested NLRP3 S803A, S803D and S803E interaction with the chaperone protein SGT1 known to bind the NLRP3 LRR domain¹⁷. All three NLRP3 mutants co-immunoprecipitated with VSV-SGT1 when ectopically expressed in 293 T cells excluding any potential misfolding of the LRR domain (Supplementary Fig. 5d). We next used structure models to investigate the modification of NLRP3/NEK7 interaction surface by S806 phosphorylation (S806p) and S806D phospho-mimetic mutation. Both S806p and S806D mutation, but not S806A mutation, led to modifications of the electrostatic potential surface in the vicinity of S806 (Supplementary Fig. 6a). Noteworthy, electrostatic changes around S806 was also observed in complex models with NEK7 R131E or Q129R mutants known to disrupt NLRP3/NEK7 interaction, suggesting that electrostatic charges may play a role in the stability over time of the different complexes¹⁶. We further carried out molecular dynamics (MD) trajectories of 100 ns and extracted the number of hydrogen bonds at the end of each simulation. The number of hydrogen bonds in the NLRP3/NEK7 complex was reduced in the case of NLRP3 S806D/NEK7 (9 bonds) similarly as NLRP3/NEK7 Q129R (9 bonds) and NLRP3/NEK7 R131E (11 bonds) used as positive controls of destabilized complex, as compared to NLRP3/NEK7 (15 bonds) or NLRP3 S806A/NEK7 (20 bonds) (Supplementary Table 1). In addition, we measured three distances between residues of NLRP3 and NEK7 respectively connected by hydrogen bonds: D747_NLRP3/R131_NEK7, R779_NLRP3/H125_NEK7 and E864_NLRP3/H125_NEK7, as well as distances of S806_NLRP3 to its 3 most proximal residues in NEK7 R121_NEK7, H125_NEK7 and K130_NEK7 (Supplementary Fig. 6b). As expected, all measured distances in WT NLRP3/NEK7 complex were stable or showed only few variations over time reflecting the stability of the structure, while on the opposite we observed drastic changes over the time with NEK7 Q129R mutant. Similarly, NLRP3 S806D showed important variations of the E864_NLRP3/H125_NEK7, D747_NLRP3/R131_NEK7 and R779_NLRP3/H125_NEK7 distances over time, while these distances were more stable in the NLRP3 S806A/NEK7 complex. To conclude, our structural models suggested that NLRP3 S806D substitution destabilized NEK7 interaction with NLRP3 LRR domain.

**Fig. 5: S803D phospho-mimetic mutation blocks NEK7 recruitment by NLRP3.**

Impaired NEK7 recruitment blocks BRCC3-mediated NLRP3 deubiquitination

Since NLRP3 LRR domain recruits the BRCC3 DUB and BRCC3-mediated NLRP3 deubiquitination is critical for the inflammasome assembly, we assessed the impact of S803D phospho-mimetic substitution in BRCC3 recruitment⁴. In Nlrp3^S803D/S803D BMDMs, NLRP3 S803D did not co-immunoprecipitate with BRCC3 upon LPS priming and nigericin activation (Fig. 5c). As already described, NLRP3 was deubiquitinated in LPS-primed BMDMs upon activation with nigericin in a BRCC3-dependent manner^4,18. On the opposite, NLRP3 S806D mutant got hyper-ubiquitinated in LPS-primed Nlrp3^S803D/S803D BMDMs upon nigericin activation consistently with its impaired BRCC3 recruitment (Fig. 5d). The amount of ubiquitinated NLRP3 S803D increased upon the inhibition of the proteasome by MG132 or lysosomal proteases by E-64d, supporting that NLRP3 S803D hyper-ubiquitination ultimately led to its combined proteasome and lysosome-mediated degradation (Supplementary Fig. 7a). Results were confirmed in human U937 reconstituted with NLRP3 WT, S806A and S806D mutants (Fig. 5e). NLRP3 WT and S806A mutant co-immunoprecipitated with BRCC3 upon LPS and nigericin treatment, while NLRP3 S806D did not. Consistently, NLRP3 WT and S806A mutant were deubiquitinated upon LPS and nigericin treatment, while the NLRP3 S806D mutant was hyper-ubiquitinated (Fig. 5f). Noteworthy, the amount of ubiquitinated NLRP3 S806D further increased upon treatment with MG132 and E-64d confirming that ubiquitinated NLRP3 S806D ultimately got degraded by combined proteasome and lysosome pathways in U937. Noteworthy, NLRP3 protein level was comparable in Brcc3^−/− and control BMDMs (Supplementary Fig. 7b). This observation supported that NLRP3 ubiquitination controlled by BRCC3 was inhibiting NLRP3 activity but did not target WT NLRP3 to degradation, consistently with previous conclusion⁴. Analysis of the ubiquitin chains decorating WT and NLRP3 S803D mutant showed that WT NLRP3 mostly associated with K63 ubiquitin chains in BMDMs treated with LPS and nigericin in the presence of BRCC3 inhibitor G5, while NLRP3 S803D mutant associated with K48 chains (supplementary Fig. 7c). Altogether, these data indicated that WT NLRP3 and NLRP3 S803D mutant differential interactions with partners may lead to different type of ubiquitination and outcome. We next investigated whether BRCC3 and NEK7 recruitment to NLRP3 were linked to one another. BRCC3 was not necessary for NEK7 recruitment as NLRP3 co-immunoprecipitated with NEK7 in Brcc3^−/− BMDMs treated with LPS and nigericin (Supplementary Fig. 7d). Reversely, HA-NEK7 increased NLRP3 co-immunoprecipitation with Myc-BRCC3 when ectopically expressed in 293 T cells (Fig. 5g), and NLRP3 did not co-immunoprecipitate with BRCC3 in Nek7^−/− immortalized BMDMs treated with LPS and nigericin (Fig. 5h), indicating that NEK7 was required for BRCC3 recruitment to NLRP3. Consistently, the covalent NLRP3 inhibitor oridonin which blocks NEK7 recruitment prevented NLRP3 endogenous co-immunoprecipitation with BRCC3 in BMDMs and led to NLRP3 ubiquitination upon LPS and nigericin treatment (Fig. 5i, j)¹⁹. Therefore, we concluded that NLRP3 S806D phospho-mimetic mutation prevented the interaction with NEK7 which is necessary for subsequent BRCC3 recruitment and NLRP3 deubiquitination.

Nlrp3 ^S803D/S803D KI mice have an impaired response to endotoxic shock in vivo

As NLRP3 was shown to sensitize mice to endotoxic shock, we next assessed the impact of NLRP3 S803D substitution in this in vivo model²⁰. Following LPS intraperitoneal injection, Nlrp3^S803D/S803D KI mice showed blunted IL-1β and IL-18 responses in sera and strongly reduced circulating IL-1α which all depend on the inflammasome, while TNF and IL-6 levels in the sera were similar as compared to WT mice (Fig. 6a). Consistent with S803D loss of function, Nlrp3^S803D/S803D KI mice showed increased resistance to LPS intraperitoneal injection similarly to Nlrp3^−/− mice (Fig. 6b and Supplementary Fig. 8).

**Fig. 6: *Nlrp3*^S803D/S803D KI mice show an impaired response to endotoxic shock in vivo.**

CSNK1A1 phosphorylates NLRP3 at S803

We then investigated the kinase targeting NLRP3 at S806 upon LPS priming. Knock-down (KD) of Mapk8 encoding JNK1 or its pharmacological inhibition did not reduce IL-1β secretion by LPS and nigericin-treated BMDMs, excluding a role for this kinase in our experimental settings (Supplementary Figs. 9a, b)¹². In silico analysis using GPS 3.0 and NetPhos 2.0 identified 20 kinases which based on their consensus motifs could phosphorylate NLRP3 at S806 (Supplementary Table 2)^21,22. SiRNA screen of these candidates revealed that KD of 4 kinase genes (Csnk1a1, Csnk2b, Camk4, Camk2b) potently inhibited pyroptosis in BMDMs treated with LPS and nigericin (Fig. 7a and Supplementary Fig. 9c). As Csnk2b and Csnk2a1 encoded respectively the regulatory and catalytic subunits of the Casein Kinase 2 (CSNK2) complex, Csnk2a1 was also included in the follow-up analysis. SiRNA-mediated KD of Csnk1a1, Camk2b, Csnk2b, and Csnk2a1 in BMDMs significantly reduced IL-1β secretion following LPS and nigericin treatment (Fig. 7b). In addition, KD of Csnk1a1 significantly reduced IL-18 secretion and strongly decreased ASC specks formation (Fig. 7c, d). Csnk1a1 KD did not reduce the expression of Il1b, Nlrp3, Pycard (encoding ASC), Casp1, or Tnf at the mRNA and protein levels, excluding that CSNK1A1 was required for LPS-triggered transcriptional response (Supplementary Fig. 9d, e). In in vitro kinase assay, recombinant Casein Kinase 1 alpha1 (CSNK1A1) phosphorylated GST-NLRP3, while GST-NLRP3 incubation with CSNK2A1/CSNK2B or CAMK2B resulted in very low and no phosphorylation of GST-NLRP3 respectively (Fig. 7e). NLRP3 co-immunoprecipitated with HA-CSNK1A1 when ectopically expressed in 293T cells (Fig. 7f), and endogenous NLRP3 co-immunoprecipitated with CSNK1A1 in BMDMs primed with LPS (Fig. 7g). Finally, HA-CSNK1A1 co-expression with NLRP3 in 293T cells resulted in the phosphorylation of NLRP3 WT but not NLRP3 S806A mutant (Fig. 7h). Consistently, CSNK1A1 inhibitor D4476 completely abrogated NLRP3 phosphorylation on serine in LPS-primed U937 (Fig. 7i). Altogether these results identify CSNK1A1 as the kinase responsible for NLRP3 phosphorylation at S803 following LPS priming.

**Fig. 7: CSNK1A1 phosphorylates NLRP3 on S806.**

Discussion

NLRP3 post-translational modifications recently emerged as a major control process of the inflammasome assembly. In particular, NLRP3 LRR deubiquitination by BRCC3 plays a key role for inflammasome assembly^4,18. Using a biochemical approach, we identified here S803 in the LRR domain of mouse NLRP3 (corresponding to S806 in human NLRP3) to be critical for BRCC3 recruitment. NLRP3 is phosphorylated at S803 upon priming and dephosphorylated upon activation. S803 is critical for inflammasome activity in both human monocytes and murine macrophages regardless of the nature of the priming and activation signals, suggesting that S803 phosphorylation status is a universal checkpoint for inflammasome assembly. Consistently, Nlrp3^S803D/S803D KI mice are resistant to endotoxic shock in vivo. Mechanistically, S803D substitution impairs the recruitment of NEK7 to NLRP3 by modifying their interaction surface. We evidenced this recruitment to be a prerequisite for BRCC3 binding. Subsequently, NLRP3 S803D is hyper-ubiquitinated resulting in its proteasome and lysosome-mediated degradation. Finally, we identified CSNK1A1 as the critical kinase targeting NLRP3 at S803. Altogether, our results highlight S803 phosphorylation status as a critical checkpoint of inflammasome activation.

S803 is phosphorylated upon priming and dephosphorylated upon activation, and both phospho-null S803A and phospho-mimetic S803D/S803E substitutions impair NLRP3 inflammasome assembly. These phenotypes are reminiscent of substitutions of phosphorylated S291 (in mouse NLRP3 corresponding to S295 in human NLRP3), with both S291A and S291E being inactive²³. Mechanistical insights revealed that NLRP3 S291 dephosphorylation is required for NLRP3 initial recruitment in the mitochondria-associated membranes (MAMs) where inflammasome probably assembles initially, while NLRP3 phosphorylation by Golgi-associated PKD is later required for inflammasome release from the MAMs to the speck. Thus, the consequences of S291 phosphorylation vary in a timely and localized manner, reconciling apparently conflicting studies^23,24,25. Similarly, both phospho-null and phospho-mimetic mutants of S3 (in mouse NLRP3, corresponding to S5 in human NLRP3) are inhibitory. Indeed S3 phosphorylation by AKT transiently protects NLRP3 from degradation upon inflammasome priming, while it blocks interaction with ASC upon speck formation^26,27. Similarly, NLRP3 phosphorylation of S803 must require a timely regulation and both phosphorylation upon priming and dephosphorylation upon activation are sequentially required for the inflammasome assembly. Defective inflammasome functions in cells expressing NLRP3 S803A mutants is consistent with the inhibitory phenotype caused by the KD of CSNK1A1 kinase expression, which we identify to phosphorylate NLRP3 at S803. As NLRP3 S803A mutation completely abolishes NLRP3 Serine phosphorylation following LPS priming, NLRP3 phosphorylation at S803 may be a prerequisite for additional priming-associated phosphorylation required for rendering NLRP3 competent for further activation¹². Interestingly, NLRP3 S803A mutant recruits NEK7 and BRCC3 upon activation, although it does not restore inflammasome activity. These observations support that NEK7 recruitment is necessary but not sufficient for active inflammasome assembly, which depends on additional S803 phosphorylation-dependent regulatory mechanisms. Noteworthy, human NLRP3 phospho-null S806A mutant shows residual activity in human U937 cells, suggesting that priming-associated NLRP3 phosphorylation at S806 may be partially dispensable in this cell line, and confirming species- and cell type-dependent regulation of the inflammasome as already described^28,29.

NLRP3 is dephosphorylated at S803 upon activation signal. NLRP3 S803D complete loss of function phenotype indicates that this dephosphorylation is mandatory for inflammasome assembly. We evidence that NLRP3 S803A but not S803D mutants co-immunoprecipitates with NEK7. Indeed S803 is located at the interaction site with NEK7 and according to our in silico models its phosphorylation affects electrostatic potential and hydrogen bonds involved in this interaction surface and reduces the stability of the NLRP3/NEK7 complex¹⁶. Impairment of NLRP3 pS803-NEK7 binding provides a molecular mechanism for the absolute requirement of S803 dephosphorylation. Although LRR domain has been reported to be dispensable for NLRP3 inflammasome regulation and assembly, no evidence in endogenous context have been provided³⁰. In addition, we evidence that LRR truncation of NLRP3 is inactive in two reconstitution systems matching endogenous expression level, independently of slight variations in the protocols used for priming and activation with this study³⁰. The NLRP3 pS803 regulatory mechanism is reminiscent of NLRP3 phosphorylation at Y859 also located in this interaction surface and the phosphorylation of which inhibits NLRP3-NEK7 interaction by steric hindrance and charge repulsion¹⁶. Therefore, in the widely used experimental model of LPS transcriptional priming for >3 h followed by activation, activation-triggered NLRP3 S803 dephosphorylation is a prerequisite for NLRP3 binding to NEK7 which occurs following the activation signal in this system^13,14. Recent work suggests that NEK7 may be dispensable for inflammasome activity in human and murine cells in some specific conditions of priming and activation³¹. Given the proposed mechanism, we assume that NLRP3 dephosphorylation at S803 might only affect NEK7-dependent inflammasome activation. However, we cannot exclude that S803 site may be involved in interaction with other partner(s) or regulator(s) and may be critical for NEK7-independent inflammasome activation as well.

In addition to NEK7, NLRP3 S803D phospho-mimetic mutant is also impaired in the recruitment of the BRCC3 DUB upon activation. While overexpression of NEK7 increases the recruitment of BRCC3 to NLRP3 when ectopically expressed, NEK7 deficiency or oridonin-based chemical disruption of NLRP3-NEK7 binding block it. Therefore, NLRP3-NEK7 binding appears to be a prerequisite for BRCC3 recruitment. Noteworthy, as no tripartite complex could be observed, NLRP3-NEK7 and NLRP3-BRCC3 interactions might be sequential. BRCC3 binds to ubiquitinated NLRP3 LRR⁴, but the critical E3 ligase still remains to be identified. Three E3 are known to ubiquitinate the LRR domain: Pellino2 participates in inflammasome priming, while MARCH7 and RNF125 are inhibitory^5,7,8. We show here that the defect in BRCC3 recruitment by NLRP3 S803D mutant ultimately leads to its hyper-ubiquitination and its degradation. Noteworthy, RNF125-mediated ubiquitination of the LRR domain with K63 chains controls the sequential recruitment of E3 CBL-B that ubiquitinates NLRP3 NACHT domain with K48 chains leading to its downregulation by proteasome-mediated degradation⁵. Whether RNF125-mediated LRR ubiquitination may control BRCC3 recruitment, or whether RNF125 and BRCC3 may antagonize each other for CBL-B recruitment would require further investigations.

We identify CSNK1A1 as the kinase targeting NLRP3 at S803. Indeed, KD of CSNK1A1 was the most potent hit of our siRNA-based screen for inflammasome modulators among a selection of kinase candidates with consensus sites matching NLRP3 S803 surrounding sequence. Phosphorylation of NLRP3 at S803 by CSNK1A1 was confirmed by in vitro as well as in cellulo kinase assays. CSNK1A1, also referred to as CK1α, is part of the CSNK1 monomeric Ser/Thr kinase family comprising 7 members (CSNK1A1, CSNK1B, CSNK1D, CSNK1E, CSNK1G1, CSNK1G2, CSNK1G3) encoded by distinct genes. CSNK1s present highly conserved kinase domains and diverse C-terminal domains. CSNK1A1 is ubiquitously expressed in various organs. Its consensus target site corresponds to pS/pT/D/E-X_1-2-S/T matching NLRP3 D₈₀₁L₈₀₂S₈₀₃ sequence. CSNK1A1 has numerous identified substrates including β-catenin, p53, PMRT1, IFNAR1, AGO2, FOXO3A, p62, UVRAG and RIPK3. CSNK1A1 regulates various biological functions and conditions including development, cancer, circadian cycle, membrane transportation, immune response, neurodegeneration, autophagy, cell cycle, RNA processing, phagocytosis and cell death^{32,33,34,35,36,37}. Consistently, Csnk1a1 knock-out is embryonically lethal. However, our study reports for the first time a function of CSNK1A1 in the regulation of inflammasome. Although CSNK1A1 is described to be constitutively active, inhibitory autophosphorylation of its C-term domain suggests regulation of this activity, which would require further investigation in the inflammasome activation context. Future development of our work would consider CSNK1A1 potential as a druggable target to inhibit NLRP3 inflammasome activation against highly prevalent inflammatory conditions and inflammaging. Although CSNK1A1 pleiotropic roles suggest possible side effects of its inhibition that may limit the use of inhibitors of its activity to acute inflammatory flares and exclude long term treatment of chronic inflammatory conditions, development of inhibitors targeting CSNK1A1 binding to NLRP3 should provide highly specific inhibitor of the NLRP3 pathway.

Methods

Cell culture

293 T cells, immortalized BMDMs and HeLa cells were cultured at 0.5–1 × 10⁶ cells/ml in Dulbecco’s modified Eagle’s Medium (DMEM) GlutaMax^TM-I supplemented with 1X penicillin/streptomycin (PS) and 10% Fetal Bovine Serum (FBS) (Gibco). Immortalized BMDMs from C57Bl6J WT and Nlrp3^−/− mice were a kind gift from Pr E. Alnemri (Jefferson University, Philadelphia). Immortalized BMDMs from C57Bl6J WT and Nek7^−/− mice were a kind gift from Pr G. Nuñez (University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, USA). U937 cells were cultured at 0.25–1 × 10⁶ cells/ml in Roswell Park Memorial Institute (RPMI) 1640 GlutaMax^TM-I supplemented with 1X penicillin/streptomycin (PS) and 10% Fetal Bovine Serum (FBS) (Gibco) and differentiated in macrophages with Phorbol-12-myristate-13 acetate (PMA) (Invivogen) (50 ng/ml, 16 h) before each experiment. NLRP3-deficient U937 have been previously described¹⁰. Primary BMDMs were differentiated from bone marrow progenitors in DMEM GlutaMax^TM-I supplemented with 10% FBS (Gibco), 10% M-CSF producing NIH 3T3 conditioned medium, 1% Hepes (Life technologies), 1% Na-pyruvate (Life technologies) for 6 days. For analysis of caspase-1 and IL-1β secretion by WB, cell media were replaced by Opti-MEM medium (Gibco) prior treatments.

Plasmids

Constructs coding for Flag-NLRP3 and Flag-NLRP3-LRR were a kind gift from F. Martinon (Unil, Lausanne, Switzerland), VSV-SGT1 from V. Petrilli (CRCL, Lyon, France), Myc-BRCC3 from W. Harper (Harvard Medical School, Boston), pcDNA3.1-HA-CSNK1A1 from P. Wang (Tongji University, Shanghai); pcDNA3-N-HA-NEK7 was purchased from Addgene. Human NLRP3 (hNLRP3), mouse NLRP3 (mNLRP3), and truncation deletions were cloned in pENTR^TM1A (Invitrogen). Mutations were performed using QuickChange^TM II kit (Agilent Technologies). Primers are listed in Supplemental Table 3. cDNAs were transferred in pInducer21 using recombination Gateway LR clonase Enzyme mix kit (Thermofisher)³⁸.

Reagents

The following reagents were used: MG132 (Sigma-Aldrich), E-64d (Enzo Life Science), VX765 (Invivogen), G5 (Merck), doxycycline (Sigma-Aldrich), LPS (O111:B4, Sigma-Aldrich), Pam3CSK4 (Invivogen), nigericin (Invivogen), ATP (Sigma-Aldrich), H-Leu-Leu-OMe (LLOMe, Santa Cruz Biotechnology), MSU (Invivogen), silica (U.S.Silica), poly(dA:dT) (Invivogen), flagellin (FLA-ST Invivogen), oridonin (Euromedex), and D4476 (Sigma-Aldrich), SP600125 (Selleck Chemical).

Cell transfection

293T cells were transfected by calcium chloride methods. U937, immortalized BMDMs and HeLa cells were transfected with poly(dA:dT), flagellin or plasmids using Lipofectamine 2000 (Invitrogen) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. For siRNA, BMDMs were transfected with SMARTpools of 4 siRNAs (Dharmacon) using Lipofectamine RNAiMax (Invitrogen) for 2 days.

Cell transduction

NLRP3-deficient U937 cells and Nlrp3^−/− immortalized BMDMs were transduced with lentiviruses generated using pInducer21-hNLRP3 or pInducer21-mNLRP3 and their indicated mutants, respectively. Transduced GFP-positive cells were sorted by cytometry as bulk (Supplementary Fig. 10).

Immunoprecipitation

For Flag-LRR purification, 293T cell lysates in RIPA buffer (50 mM Tris-HCl pH 8.0, 300 mM NaCl, 1 mM EDTA, 0.05% Sodium deoxycholate, 1% Triton X-100, 0.1% SDS, 1 mM PMSF, 1 mM NaF, 1 mM Na₃VO₄, and EDTA-free protease inhibitor cocktail (Roche)) were incubated with anti-Flag M2 affinity agarose gel (Sigma-Aldrich) for 16 h. Beads were washed 15 times in RIPA buffer, and Flag-LRR was eluted in RIPA buffer with 100 μg/ml 3XFlag peptide (Sigma-Aldrich). For NLRP3 ubiquitination assay, lysates of 2 × 10⁶ BMDMs (10 mM Tris-HCl pH 8, 300 mM NaCl, 2% SDS, 50 mM NaF, 2 mM Na₃VO₄, EDTA-free protease inhibitor cocktail), were boiled for 10 min then diluted 10X in dilution buffer (10 mM Tris-HCl pH 8, 150 mM NaCl, 1 mM EDTA, 1% Triton X-100, EDTA-free protease inhibitor cocktail). Cleared lysates were incubated with anti-NLRP3 and Protein A/G Ultralink™ resin (Thermo Scientific) for 16 h. Beads were washed 10 times with wash buffer (10 mM Tris-HCl pH 8, 300 mM NaCl, 0.1% SDS, 0.05% Sodium deoxycholate, 1% Triton X-100, 1 mM PMSF, 50 mM NaF, 2 mM Na₃VO₄, EDTA-free protease inhibitor cocktail), and eluted in sample buffer 2X (250 mM Tris-HCl pH 6.8, 25% Glycerol, 5% SDS, 10% β-Mercaptoethanol, Bromophenol Blue). For endogenous BRCC3 co-IP, lysates of 1.2 × 10⁶ BMDMs or 4 × 10⁶ U937 cells (50 mM Tris-HCl pH 7.4, 150 mM NaCl, 2 mM EDTA, 1% NP-40, 1 mM PMSF, 1 mM NaF, 1 mM Na₃VO₄, EDTA-free protease inhibitor cocktail) were incubated with anti-BRCC3 (Cell Signaling Technology) or IgG (Diagenode) for 16 h, and ProteinA-Dynabeads® (Thermofisher) for 3 h. For ASC co-IP, 6 × 10⁶ BMDMs were treated with VX765 (2.5 μM) 15 min before activation by nigericin and then mechanically lysed in hypotonic buffer (20 mM Hepes pH 7.4, 10 mM KCl, 1 mM PMSF, 1 mM NaF, 1 mM Na₃VO₄, EDTA-free protease inhibitor cocktail) by 50 strokes through 25G syringe. Lysates were cleared by centrifugation (350 g 5 min 4 °C), diluted in 2X IP buffer (100 mM Tris pH 7.4, 300 mM NaCl, 0.2% NP-40, 20 mM MgCl₂, 1 mM PMSF, 1 mM NaF, 1 mM Na₃VO₄, EDTA-free protease inhibitor cocktail) containing 25 U/ml benzonase (Sigma-Aldrich), and incubated with anti-ASC (AL177, Adipogen) for 16 h and ProteinA-Dynabeads® for 1 h. For ectopically expressed NLRP3 co-IP, 6 × 10⁶ HeLa cells were transfected with pcDNA3-NLRP3 WT, S803A or S803D mutants. 30 h later, lysates (100 mM Tris-HCl pH 8, 90 mM NaCl, 10 mM MgCl₂, 0.1% Triton X-100, EDTA-free protease inhibitor cocktail) were incubated with anti-NLRP3 and Protein G-Sepharose beads (Sigma-Aldrich) for 16 h. For endogenous NEK7 co-IP, lysates of 3 × 10⁶ BMDMs or 3.6 × 10⁶ U937 cells (50 mM Tris-HCl pH 7.4, 150 mM NaCl, 2 mM EDTA, 1% NP-40, 1 mM PMSF, 1 mM NaF, 1 mM Na₃VO₄, EDTA-free protease inhibitor cocktail) were incubated with anti-NEK7 (EPR4900, Abcam) and Protein A/G resin for 16 h. For VSV-SGT1 co-IP, 1.2 × 10⁶ 293T cells were transfected with plasmid coding for VSV-SGT1, and pcDNA3-NLRP3 WT, S803A, S803D or S803E mutants. 24 h later, cells were lysed in NP-40 lysis buffer (50 mM Tris-HCl pH 7.4, 150 mM NaCl, 2 mM EDTA, 1% NP-40, 1 mM PMSF, 1 mM NaF, 1 mM Na₃VO₄, EDTA-free protease inhibitor cocktail) and lysates were incubated with anti-VSV (P5D4, Sigma-Aldrich) and Protein A/G resin for 16 h. For Myc-BRCC3 co-IP, 1.2 × 10⁶ 293T cells were transfected with plasmid coding for Myc-BRCC3, pcDNA3-NLRP3 WT or S803D, and pcDNA3-N-HA-NEK7. 24 h later, lysates (50 mM Tris-HCl pH 7.4, 150 mM NaCl, 2 mM EDTA, 1% NP-40, 1 mM PMSF, 1 mM NaF, 1 mM Na₃VO₄, EDTA-free protease inhibitor cocktail) were incubated with anti-Myc (C3956, Sigma-Aldrich) and Protein A/G resin for 16 h. For HA-CSNK1A1 co-IP, 1.2 × 10⁶ 293T cells were transfected with pcDNA3.1-HA-CSNK1A1 and pcDNA3-NLRP3 WT. 24 h later, lysates (50 mM Tris-HCl pH 7.4, 150 mM NaCl, 2 mM EDTA, 1% NP-40, 1 mM PMSF, 1 mM NaF, 1 mM Na₃VO₄, EDTA-free protease inhibitor cocktail) were incubated with anti-HA-agarose beads (A2095, Sigma-Aldrich) for 16 h. For endogenous CSNK1A1 co-IP, 6 × 10⁶ BMDMs were treated with LPS (50 ng/ml, 6 h). Lysates (150 mM Tris-HCl pH 7.4, 300 mM NaCl, 2 mM EDTA, 1% NP-40, 1 mM PMSF, 1 mM NaF, 1 mM Na₃VO₄, EDTA-free protease inhibitor cocktail) were incubated with anti-CSNK1A1 (301–991 A, Bethyl Laboratories) and Protein A/G resin for 16 h. For all co-IPs, beads were washed six times in lysis buffer and eluted in sample buffer 2X. Antibodies are listed in Supplemental Table 4.

Mass spectrometry

Flag-LRR mass spectrometry analysis was performed at the Taplin facility (R. Tomaino and S. Gygi, Harvard Medical School, Boston). The samples were reduced (1 mM DTT, 30 min 60 °C), alkylated (5 mM iodoacetamide, 15 min) and in-gel digested (50 mM ammonium bicarbonate solution containing 12.5 ng/µl trypsin (Promega), 16 h 37 °C,). Peptides were extracted, washed (50% acetonitrile, 1% formic acid), dried and reconstituted (2.5% acetonitrile, 0.1% formic acid). Samples were loaded via a Famos auto sampler (LC Packings) onto equilibrated nano-scale reverse-phase HPLC capillary columns containing 2.6 µm C18 spherical silica beads into a fused silica capillary (100 µm inner diameter x ~30 cm length)³⁹. Peptides were eluted with increasing concentrations of solvent (97.5% acetonitrile, 0.1% formic acid), subjected to electrospray ionization and entered into an LTQ Orbitrap Velos Pro ion-trap mass spectrometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific). Eluted peptides were fragmented to produce a tandem mass spectrum of specific fragment ions. Sequences were determined by matching databases with the fragmentation pattern using Sequest (ThermoFinnigan). The modifications of 79.9663 mass units to serine, threonine, and tyrosine, and of 114.0429 Da to lysine were included in the database searches to determine phospho- and ubiquitinated peptides respectively. Phosphorylation assignments were determined by the Ascore algorithm⁴⁰. All databases include a reversed version of all the sequences and the data was filtered to between 1–2% peptide false discovery rate.

Inflammasome activation

Inflammasome was activated using the following protocols unless stated otherwise. 0.5 × 10⁶ U937 cells/ml were differentiated with PMA (50 ng/ml, 16 h), treated with doxycycline (1 μg/ml, 4 h), primed with LPS (40–50 ng/ml, 3–4 h) or Pam3CSK4 (0.5 μg/ml), and activated with nigericin (15 μg/ml, 1 h), MSU (250 μg/ml, 16 h) or silica (1 mg/ml, 16 h), or transfected with poly(dA:dT) (1 μg/ml, 6 h). 0.3 × 10⁶ immortalized BMDMs cells/ml were treated with doxycycline (2 μg/ml, 4 h), primed with LPS (50 ng/ml, 4 h), and activated with nigericin (15 μg/ml, 2 h), ATP (2 mM, 30 min) or transfected with flagellin (10 μg/ml, 6 h). 0.3 × 10⁶ primary BMDMs/ml were primed with LPS (50 ng/ml, 4 h) or Pam3CSK4 (1 μg/ml, 4 h), and activated by addition of nigericin (15 ug/ml, 1 h), ATP (2 mM, 30 min), LLOMe (1 mM, 1 h) or MSU (250 μg/ml, 16 h) to the media, or transfected with flagellin (10 μg/ml, 6 h), poly(dA:dT) (1 μg/ml, 6 h) or LPS (500 ng/ml, 20 h) with Lipofectamine 2000 (ThermoFisher) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. For bacterial infection, U937 and immortalized BMDMs were grown in the absence of PS, S. Typhimurium SL1344 (MOI 2.4) were added to the media for 2 h. Primary BMDMs were grown in the absence of PS and primed with LPS (50 ng/ml, 4 h) before addition of S. Typhimurium SL1344 (MOI 234) for 2 h, or addition of E. coli J53 (MOI 100) for 16 h with gentamycin (10 μg/ml) added 1 h after E. coli J53 infection.

ELISA

The following ELISA kits were used: human IL-1β, human TNF, mouse IL-1β, mouse TNF (Duoset, RnD Systems), human IL-18 (MBL), mouse IL-18 (Thermofisher). Data were acquired using i-control (Tecan). Measured values are available in the Source Data file. Cytokines in sera were measured using the following Luminex kits: mouse IL-6, mouse IL-1a, mouse IL-1b, mouse TNF, mouse IL-18 (Bio-Rad), and analyzed with Luminex Bioplex manager (Bio-Rad).

Western-blot analysis

To test protein level in lysates, cells were directly lysed in sample buffer 2X. To test protein secretion, cell supernatants were concentrated using Amicon Ultra-0.5 mL Centrifugal Filters (Millipore) and diluted in sample buffer 2X. Samples were analyzed by SDS-PAGE and transferred to PVDF membranes. The following antibodies were used: anti-Flag (M2, Sigma-Aldrich), anti-Ub (Dako, Cell Signaling Technology and Santa Cruz Biotechnology), anti-K48 Ub (4289, Cell Signaling Technology), anti-K63 Ub (5621, Cell Signaling Technology), anti-IL-1β (166926, RnD Systems, and D3U3E, Cell Signaling Technology), anti-Caspase-1 (5B10, BioLegend), anti-Actin (C4, Sigma-Aldrich), anti-NLRP3 (Cryo2, Adipogen), anti-ASC (Santa Cruz Biotechnology and Adipogen), anti-BRCC3 (Cell Signaling Technology), anti-LaminB (B-10, Santa Cruz Biotechnology), anti-HA (HA-7, Sigma-Aldrich), anti-VSV (P5D4, Sigma-Aldrich), anti-NEK7 (EPR4900, Abcam), anti-Myc (C3956, Sigma-Aldrich), anti-PhosphoSerine (9631s, Cell Signaling Technology), anti-pNLRP3_S198¹², anti-CSNK1A1 (301–991A, Bethyl Laboratories and H-7 sc-74582, Santa Cruz Biotechnology), HRP-anti-Mouse IgG (H + L) and HRP-anti-Rabbit IgG (H + L) (Promega), HRP-anti-Rat IgM+IgG (H + L) (Southern Biotech), and HRP-anti-Rabbit IgG(H + L) (Invitrogen). Data have been acquired on ChemiDoc Touch imaging system (BioRad) using Image Lab software (BioRad). Quantifications were performed with ImageJ. Uncropped and unprocessed scans of blots are available in the Source Data file. Antibodies are listed in Supplemental Table 4.

Microscopy

For ASC speck assays, cells were fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde (in PBS, 20 min), permeabilized in PBS, 0.1% Triton X-100, 0.2% Bovine serum albumin (BSA) (30 min), and stained with anti-ASC antibodies (2 μg/ml, Santa Cruz Biotechnology or 1 μg/ml, Adipogen) in PBS, 5% BSA (in PBS, 1 h) followed by anti-Rabbit IgG(H + L)-Alexa Fluor 660 or anti-Rabbit IgG(H + L)-Alexa Fluor 488 (6.7 μg/ml in PBS, 0.2% BSA, 30 min). Cells were imaged using AxioImager Z1 (Zeiss) and ×40 objectives. Images were quantified using ImageJ software. Caspase-1 activity was stained using FAM-FLICA Caspase-1 Assay kit (ImmunoChemisty Technologies) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Briefly, Hoechst 33342 (0.4 μg/ml, ImmunoChemisty Technologies) and FAM-FLICA reagent (1/50, 1 h) were added in the culture media upon inflammasome activation. Cells were washed once in DPBS (with calcium/ magnesium pH 7.1, Gibco), and media was replaced by DPBS/glycerol (1:1). Cells were imaged using CQ1 high content screening microscope (Yokogawa) and 10X objectives. Images were quantified using CQ1 and ImageJ softwares. Values are available in the Source Data file. Antibodies are listed in Supplemental Table 4.

Cell death assay

To assess cell permeabilization, cells were cultured in media without phenol red. PI (1.25 μg/ml, Immunochemistry technologies), YOPRO^TM-1 Iodide (1 μM, Invitrogen) and Hoechst (0.2 μg/ml, Immunochemistry technologies) were added 1 h before time-lapse imaging using CQ1 high content screening microscope (Yokogawa). Twi images/well were taken every 10 min using ×10 objectives. Images were quantified using the CQ1 software (Yokogawa). Pyroptosis was assessed using Cytotoxicity Detection Kit^PLUS (LDH) (Roche) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Values are available in the Source Data file.

ASC oligomerization assay

BMDMs (0.3 × 10⁶ cells/ml) were resuspended in 20 mM HEPES pH 7.5, 10 mM KCl, 1.5 mM MgCl₂, 1 mM EDTA, 1 mM EGTA, 320 mM sucrose and EDTA-free protease inhibitor cocktail, and mechanically disrupted through 21 G needles 30 times. Lysates were centrifugated at 300×g 8 min and supernatants were lysed in 1 volume of CHAPS buffer (20 mM HEPES, 5 mM MgCl₂, 0.5 mM EGTA, 0.1% CHAPS and EDTA-free protease inhibitor cocktail) and then centrifugated at 5000 × g for 8 min. The pellets were washed once with PBS, resuspended in CHAPS buffer, crosslinked with disuccinimidyl suberate (DSS, 2 mM, 37 °C, 1 h) (Thermofisher), and then quenched in sample buffer 2X.

Quantitative PCR

BMDMs (0.3 × 10⁶ cells/ml) were lyzed in TRIzol (Invivogen) for total RNA purification. Single strand cDNAs were synthetized using ImProm-II™ Reverse Transcription System (Promega). QPCR were performed using iTaq™ Universal SYBR Green Supermix (Bio-Rad) on CFX96 Touch Real-Time PCR Detection System (Bio-Rad). Primers are listed in Supplementary Table 3. Data were analyzed with CFX Maestro software (Bio-Rad). Values are available in the Source Data file.

Mice

C57BL/6 J mice (Charles River laboratory) were housed at the PBES specific pathogen-free rodent facility (ENS Lyon) with food provided ad libidum, 13 h light/11 h dark cycle, 22 °C +/−2 °C, 50% +/−10% humidity.C57BL/6 J Nlrp3^−/− mice were a kind gift from V. Petrilli (CRCL, Lyon). Experiments were performed in accordance with all national and institutional regulations for animal testing and research and protocols have been approved by the CECCAPP local ethic committee and the French Ministère de l’Enseignement Supérieur, de la Recherche et de l’Innovation. Nlrp3^S803D/S803D KI mice were generated in-house by Crispr/CAS9 using UCUGAUUCCAAAGUCCCCCAGUUUUAGAGCUAUGCUGUUUUG (Eurogentec) as crRNA and TGTCCCATCAATGCTGCTTCGACATCTCCTCTGTCCTGAGCAGCAGCCAGAAGCTGGTGGAGCTGGACCTCgaTGACAATGCaCTGGGGGACTTTGGAATtcGATTGCTGTGTGTGGGACTGAAGCACCTGCTCTGCA as ssODN (Eurogentec) by electroporation of C57BL/6 J mouse blastocytes⁴¹. Mice were genotyped by specific PCR using TCACTGGCTGACTGAACGAC primer (primer R) with GGACCTCAGTGACAATGCC (primer WT-F) or TGGACCTCGATGACAATGCA (primer KI-F) primers. Genotyping were confirmed by unspecific PCR using primer R and ATCTCCCTAAGGTCACCCCC (primer F) followed by EcoR1 digestion. Mice were backcrossed for 5 generations with C57BL/6J. WT littermates were used as controls in all experiments. For endotoxic shock, 7-week old males Nlrp3^S803D/S803D, Nlrp3^−/− and their respective Nlrp3^+/+ littermates were intraperitoneally injected with LPS (10 mg/kg). Mice survival was monitored each 12 h for 10 days and cytokine levels in the sera were measured at 2 and 4 h post-injection using Bio-Plex Pro Assays (Bio-Rad). Brcc3^−/− mice were generated in-house by Crispr/CAS9 using AGUGAUGGGUCUGUGUAUAGGUUUUAGAGCUAUGCUGUUUUG (Eurogentec) as crRNA by electroporation of C57BL/6 J mouse blastocytes, resulting in the frameshift deletion of 2 nucleotides in exon 1⁴¹. Mice were backcrossed for 7 generations with C57BL/6J, and genotyped by specific PCR using TCTGGCCTGGTTTGCAGTTT primer with GGAAGTGATGGGTCTGTGTATA (WT) or AAGTGATGGGTCTGTGTAGG (KO) primers.

Structural models

Models were based on a resolved structure and proposed models (PDB 6npy, with amino acid numbering changed for consistency, S804 corresponding to S806), and represented using PyMOL software¹⁶. The structures of NLRP3/NEK7 complex with different NLRP3 and NEK7 substitutions have been modeled using CHARMM-gui server (PDB reader)^42,43. Electrostatic potential surfaces of each complex have been calculated using PBEQ solver from CHARMM-gui server. For the sake of clarity, the surface has been calculated for aa 742–864 of NLRP3 and 116–134 of NEK7. Molecular dynamics (MD) simulations were carried out on graphics processing units (GPUs) by means of high throughput MD (HTMD) software with CHARMM36m force field (trajectory of 100 ns). At the end of each simulation, the number of hydrogen bonds were extracted using Ligplot software.

In vitro kinase assays

GST-NLRP3 (1 μg, Abcam) was incubated of with GST-CSNK1A1 (100 ng, Sino Biological), GST-CSNK2A1 (100 ng, Sino Biological)/GST-CSNK2B (100 ng, Creative Biomart), or 6-His-GST-CAMK2B (100 ng, Sino Biological)/Calmodulin (1 μg, Enzo) with 50 μM ATP and 4 μCi of [γ³²P]-ATP (PerkinElmer) in kinase buffer (50 mM HEPES pH 7.3, 100 mM NaCl, 10 mM MgCl₂, 0.05% Triton X-100, 10 mM β -glycerophosphate, 5 mM NaF) at 30 °C for 30 min in a final volume of 39 μL, supplemented with 2 mM CaCl₂ for CAMK2B/Calmodulin reactions. Reactions were stopped by adding 15 μL of LDS (ThermoFisher Scientific) and 6 μL of DTT (Euromedex) 500 mM. Samples were analyzed by electrophoresis using Bolt 4–12% Bis-Tris Plus gel (ThermoFisher Scientific) followed by Coomassie blue gel staining using PageBlue^TM Protein staining solution (ThermoFisher Scientific) and autoradiography.

In cellulo phosphorylation assays

In all, 5 × 10⁶ U937 cells were treated with PMA (50 ng/ml) and doxycycline (2 μg/ml) for 16 h, followed by D4476 (20μM, 15 min before LPS), LPS (50 ng/ml, 4–5 h) and nigericin (15 μg/ml, 20 min). 1.2 × 10⁶ 293 T cells were transfected with pcDNA3.1-HA-CSNK1A1 and pcDNA3-NLRP3 WT or S806A mutant for 24 h. Lysates (50 mM Tris-HCl pH 7.4, 150 mM NaCl, 2 mM EDTA, 1% NP-40, 1 mM PMSF, 1 mM NaF, 1 mM Na₃VO₄, EDTA-free protease inhibitor cocktail) were incubated with anti-NLRP3 and Protein A/G resin for 16 h. Beads were washed 6 times in lysis buffer and eluted in sample buffer 2X.

Statistics

Data were processed using Excel (Microsoft). ELISA and microscopy data were analyzed by ordinary two-way ANOVA with two-sided Tukey’s multiple comparison test or repeated measure two-way ANOVA with two-sided Sidak’s multiple comparison test (Prism v7). Cell deaths were analyzed with ordinary one-way ANOVA with two-sided Dunnett’s multiple comparison test with single pooled variance. Survival curves were compared by two-sided Mantel-Cox test (Prism v7). Adjusted P values are listed in Supplementary Table 5.

Reporting summary

Further information on research design is available in the Nature Research Reporting Summary linked to this article.

Data availability

All data supporting the findings of this study are provided in the Article and its Supplementary Information, or from the corresponding author on reasonable request. Source data are provided with this paper.

References

Martinon, F., Mayor, A. & Tschopp, J. The inflammasomes: guardians of the body. Annu. Rev. Immunol. 27, 229–265 (2009).
Article CAS Google Scholar
Bauernfeind, F. G. et al. Cutting edge: NF-kappaB activating pattern recognition and cytokine receptors license NLRP3 inflammasome activation by regulating NLRP3 expression. J. Immunol. 183, 787–791 (2009).
Article CAS Google Scholar
Juliana, C. et al. Non-transcriptional priming and deubiquitination regulate NLRP3 inflammasome activation. J. Biol. Chem. 287, 36617–36622 (2012).
Article CAS Google Scholar
Py, B. F., Kim, M. S., Vakifahmetoglu-Norberg, H. & Yuan, J. Deubiquitination of NLRP3 by BRCC3 critically regulates inflammasome activity. Mol. Cell 49, 331–338 (2013).
Article CAS Google Scholar
Tang, J. et al. Sequential ubiquitination of NLRP3 by RNF125 and Cbl-b limits inflammasome activation and endotoxemia. J. Exp. Med. 217, e20182091 (2020).
Han, S. et al. Lipopolysaccharide primes the NALP3 inflammasome by inhibiting its ubiquitination and degradation mediated by the SCFFBXL2 E3 ligase. J. Biol. Chem. 290, 18124–18133 (2015).
Article CAS Google Scholar
Yan, Y. et al. Dopamine controls systemic inflammation through inhibition of NLRP3 inflammasome. Cell 160, 62–73 (2015).
Article CAS Google Scholar
Humphries, F. et al. The E3 ubiquitin ligase Pellino2 mediates priming of the NLRP3 inflammasome. Nat. Commun. 9, 1560 (2018).
Article ADS Google Scholar
Spalinger, M. R. et al. NLRP3 tyrosine phosphorylation is controlled by protein tyrosine phosphatase PTPN22. J. Clin. Invest. 126, 1783–1800 (2016).
Article Google Scholar
Lagrange, B. et al. Human caspase-4 detects tetra-acylated LPS and cytosolic Francisella and functions differently from murine caspase-11. Nat. Commun. 9, 242 (2018).
Article ADS Google Scholar
Fernandes-Alnemri, T. et al. Cutting edge: TLR signaling licenses IRAK1 for rapid activation of the NLRP3 inflammasome. J. Immunol. 191, 3995–3999 (2013).
Article CAS Google Scholar
Song, N. et al. NLRP3 phosphorylation is an essential priming event for inflammasome activation. Mol. Cell 68, 185–197.e6 (2017).
Article CAS Google Scholar
Shi, H. et al. NLRP3 activation and mitosis are mutually exclusive events coordinated by NEK7, a new inflammasome component. Nat. Immunol. 17, 250–258 (2016).
Article CAS Google Scholar
He, Y., Zeng, M. Y., Yang, D., Motro, B. & Nunez, G. NEK7 is an essential mediator of NLRP3 activation downstream of potassium efflux. Nature 530, 354–357 (2016).
Article ADS CAS Google Scholar
Schmid-Burgk, J. L. et al. A genome-wide CRISPR (clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats) screen identifies NEK7 as an essential component of NLRP3 inflammasome activation. J. Biol. Chem. 291, 103–109 (2016).
Article CAS Google Scholar
Sharif, H. et al. Structural mechanism for NEK7-licensed activation of NLRP3 inflammasome. Nature 570, 338–343 (2019).
Article ADS CAS Google Scholar
Mayor, A., Martinon, F., De Smedt, T., Petrilli, V. & Tschopp, J. A crucial function of SGT1 and HSP90 in inflammasome activity links mammalian and plant innate immune responses. Nat. Immunol. 8, 497–503 (2007).
Article CAS Google Scholar
Ren, G. et al. ABRO1 promotes NLRP3 inflammasome activation through regulation of NLRP3 deubiquitination. EMBO J. 38, e100376 (2019).
He, H. et al. Oridonin is a covalent NLRP3 inhibitor with strong anti-inflammasome activity. Nat. Commun. 9, 2550 (2018).
Article ADS Google Scholar
Sutterwala, F. S. et al. Critical role for NALP3/CIAS1/Cryopyrin in innate and adaptive immunity through its regulation of caspase-1. Immunity 24, 317–327 (2006).
Article CAS Google Scholar
Xue, Y. et al. GPS 2.0, a tool to predict kinase-specific phosphorylation sites in hierarchy. Mol. Cell. Proteom. 7, 1598–1608 (2008).
Article CAS Google Scholar
Blom, N., Gammeltoft, S. & Brunak, S. Sequence and structure-based prediction of eukaryotic protein phosphorylation sites. J. Mol. Biol. 294, 1351–1362 (1999).
Article CAS Google Scholar
Zhang, Z. et al. Protein kinase D at the Golgi controls NLRP3 inflammasome activation. J. Exp. Med. 214, 2671–2693 (2017).
Article CAS Google Scholar
Guo, C. et al. Bile acids control inflammation and metabolic disorder through inhibition of NLRP3 inflammasome. Immunity 45, 802–816 (2016).
Article CAS Google Scholar
Mortimer, L., Moreau, F., MacDonald, J. A. & Chadee, K. NLRP3 inflammasome inhibition is disrupted in a group of auto-inflammatory disease CAPS mutations. Nat. Immunol. 17, 1176–1186 (2016).
Article CAS Google Scholar
Stutz, A. et al. NLRP3 inflammasome assembly is regulated by phosphorylation of the pyrin domain. J. Exp. Med. 214, 1725–1736 (2017).
Article CAS Google Scholar
Zhao, W. et al. AKT regulates NLRP3 inflammasome activation by phosphorylating NLRP3 serine 5. J. Immunol. Baltim. 205, 2255–2264 (2020).
Article CAS Google Scholar
Gaidt, M. M. et al. Human monocytes engage an alternative inflammasome pathway. Immunity 44, 833–846 (2016).
Article CAS Google Scholar
Gritsenko, A. et al. Priming is dispensable for NLRP3 inflammasome activation in human monocytes in vitro. Front. Immunol. 11, 565924 (2020).
Article CAS Google Scholar
Hafner-Bratkovič, I. et al. NLRP3 lacking the leucine-rich repeat domain can be fully activated via the canonical inflammasome pathway. Nat. Commun. 9, 5182 (2018).
Article ADS Google Scholar
Schmacke, N. A. et al. Priming enables a NEK7-independent route of NLRP3 activation. bioRxiv https://doi.org/10.1101/799320 (2019).
Elyada, E. et al. CKIα ablation highlights a critical role for p53 in invasiveness control. Nature 470, 409–413 (2011).
Article ADS CAS Google Scholar
Hanna-Addams, S., Liu, S., Liu, H., Chen, S. & Wang, Z. CK1α, CK1δ, and CK1ε are necrosome components which phosphorylate serine 227 of human RIPK3 to activate necroptosis. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 117, 1962–1970 (2020).
Article CAS Google Scholar
Golden, R. J. et al. An Argonaute phosphorylation cycle promotes microRNA-mediated silencing. Nature 542, 197–202 (2017).
Article ADS CAS Google Scholar
Schneider, R. K. et al. Role of casein kinase 1A1 in the biology and targeted therapy of del(5q) MDS. Cancer Cell 26, 509–520 (2014).
Article CAS Google Scholar
Liu, J. et al. Mammalian casein kinase 1alpha and its leishmanial ortholog regulate stability of IFNAR1 and type I interferon signaling. Mol. Cell. Biol. 29, 6401–6412 (2009).
Article CAS Google Scholar
Amit, S. et al. Axin-mediated CKI phosphorylation of beta-catenin at Ser 45: a molecular switch for the Wnt pathway. Genes Dev. 16, 1066–1076 (2002).
Article CAS Google Scholar
Meerbrey, K. L. et al. The pINDUCER lentiviral toolkit for inducible RNA interference in vitro and in vivo. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 108, 3665–3670 (2011).
Article ADS CAS Google Scholar
Peng, J. & Gygi, S. P. Proteomics: the move to mixtures. J. Mass Spectrom. 36, 1083–1091 (2001).
Article ADS CAS Google Scholar
Beausoleil, S. A., Villén, J., Gerber, S. A., Rush, J. & Gygi, S. P. A probability-based approach for high-throughput protein phosphorylation analysis and site localization. Nat. Biotechnol. 24, 1285–1292 (2006).
Article CAS Google Scholar
Teixeira, M. et al. Electroporation of mice zygotes with dual guide RNA/Cas9 complexes for simple and efficient cloning-free genome editing. Sci. Rep. 8, 474 (2018).
Article ADS Google Scholar
Jo, S., Kim, T., Iyer, V. G. & Im, W. CHARMM-GUI: a web-based graphical user interface for CHARMM. J. Comput. Chem. 29, 1859–1865 (2008).
Article CAS Google Scholar
Jo, S. et al. CHARMM-GUI PDB manipulator for advanced modeling and simulations of proteins containing nonstandard residues. Adv. Protein Chem. Struct. Biol. 96, 235–265 (2014).
Article CAS Google Scholar

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported in part by the European Research Council (ERC-2013-CoG_616986 to B.F.P.), the Agence Nationale de la Recherche (ANR-13-JSV3-0002-01 to B.F.P., IDEXLYON of Université de Lyon Investissements d’Avenir program ANR-16-IDEX-0005 to B.F.P., AAPG 2017 LYSODIABETES to R.R., ANR-10-LABX-0030-INRT to R.R., ANR-10-IDEX-0002-02 to R.R., and ANR INGESTEM French National infrastructure to R.R.), the Finovi Fundation (to B.F.P.), the Chinese Scientific Council (201600090079 to T.N.), the European Foundation for the Study of Diabetes (EFSD)/Novo Nordisk Diabetes Research Programme grant (to R.R.) and by the “Fondation Pour La Recherche Médicale (FRM)” (EQU201903007859, Prix Roger Propice Prize, both to R.R.; DEQ20170336744 to V.P.). We thank Emad Alnemri (Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, USA) for immortalized Nlrp3^−/− and wild-type BMDMs, Jürg Tschopp and Fabio Martinon (UNIL, Lausanne, Switzerland) for the FLAG-NLRP3 constructs, Gabriel Nuñez (University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, USA) for immortalized Nek7^−/− and wild-type BMDMs, and Tao Li (National Center for Biomedical Analysis, Beijing, China). We thank Isabelle Durieux (CIRI, Lyon, France) for help with subcloning. We thank Suzy Markossian and Marie Teixeira (SFR Biosciences, Lyon, France) for Crispr/CAS9-based mouse transgenesis. We acknowledge the contribution of SFR Biosciences (UMS3444/CNRS, US8/Inserm, ENS de Lyon, UCBL) PLATIM, PBES, genotyping and flow cytometry facilities, as well as the Taplin mass spectrometry facility (Harvard Medical School, Boston).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

CIRI, Centre International de Recherche en Infectiologie, Univ Lyon, Inserm, U1111, Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1, CNRS, UMR5308, ENS de Lyon, F-69007, Lyon, France
Tingting Niu, Charlotte De Rosny, Séverine Chautard, Amaury Rey, Danish Patoli, Marine Groslambert, Camille Cosson, Brice Lagrange, Thomas Henry & Bénédicte F. Py
Shanghai Key Laboratory of Regulatory Biology, Institute of Biomedical Sciences and School of Life Sciences, East China Normal University, 500 Dongchuan Road, 200241, Shanghai, China
Tingting Niu & Jeimin Wong
IGBMC, Institut de Génétique et de Biologie Moléculaire et Cellulaire, CNRS, UMR7104, Inserm, U964, Université de Strasbourg, Illkirch, France
Zhirong Zhang & Roméo Ricci
Université Côte d’Azur, Inserm, C3M, F-06204, Nice, France
Orane Visvikis & Laurent Boyer
CRCL, Centre de Recherche en Cancérologie de Lyon, INSERM U1052, CNRS UMR5286, Université de Lyon, Université Lyon 1, Centre Léon Bérard, Lyon, France
Sabine Hacot & Virginie Petrilli
Institut des Sciences Analytiques (ISA), Univ Lyon, CNRS, CNRS UMR5280, Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1, Villeurbanne, France
Maggy Hologne & Olivier Walker
Shanghai Tenth People’s Hospital of Tongji University, Tongji Cancer Center, School of Medicine, Tongji University, 200092, Shanghai, China
Ping Wang

Authors

Tingting Niu
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Charlotte De Rosny
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Séverine Chautard
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Amaury Rey
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Danish Patoli
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Marine Groslambert
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Camille Cosson
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Brice Lagrange
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Zhirong Zhang
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Orane Visvikis
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Sabine Hacot
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Maggy Hologne
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Olivier Walker
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Jeimin Wong
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Ping Wang
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Roméo Ricci
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Thomas Henry
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Laurent Boyer
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Virginie Petrilli
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Bénédicte F. Py
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

T.N., C.D.R., S.C., A.R., D.P., M.G., C.C., B.L., Z.Z., O.V. and S.H. performed the experimental studies and carried out the analysis. M.H. and O.W. performed the structural model studies. B.F.P., J.W., P.W., R.R., T.H., L.B. and V.P. supervised the work. B.F.P. and T.N. wrote the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Bénédicte F. Py.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Peer review information Nature Communications thanks the anonymous reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work. Peer reviewer reports are available.

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Information

Peer Review File

Reporting Summary

Source data

Source Data

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Niu, T., De Rosny, C., Chautard, S. et al. NLRP3 phosphorylation in its LRR domain critically regulates inflammasome assembly. Nat Commun 12, 5862 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-021-26142-w

Download citation

Received: 08 February 2021
Accepted: 17 September 2021
Published: 06 October 2021
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-021-26142-w

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.