Correction to: Nature Communications https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-021-24573-z, published online 23 July 2021.

The original version of this Article contained an additional reference and incorrectly reported the number of genes in the penultimate paragraph of the ‘Introduction’. The original sentence read “… compared to 12,137 human genes in refs. 8, 13, 434 human genes in ref. 15”. This has been corrected to “… compared to 12,137 human genes in ref. 13, and 8,434 human genes in ref. 15”. This has been corrected in the PDF and HTML versions of the Article.