Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Lateral advection supports nitrogen export in the oligotrophic open-ocean Gulf of Mexico

Abstract

In contrast to its productive coastal margins, the open-ocean Gulf of Mexico (GoM) is notable for highly stratified surface waters with extremely low nutrient and chlorophyll concentrations. Field campaigns in 2017 and 2018 identified low rates of turbulent mixing, which combined with oligotrophic nutrient conditions, give very low estimates for diffusive flux of nitrate into the euphotic zone (< 1 µmol N m−2 d−1). Estimates of local N2-fixation are similarly low. In comparison, measured export rates of sinking particulate organic nitrogen (PON) from the euphotic zone are 2 – 3 orders of magnitude higher (i.e. 462 – 1144 µmol N m−2 d−1). We reconcile these disparate findings with regional scale dynamics inferred independently from remote-sensing products and a regional biogeochemical model and find that laterally-sourced organic matter is sufficient to support >90% of open-ocean nitrogen export in the GoM. Results show that lateral transport needs to be closely considered in studies of biogeochemical balances, particularly for basins enclosed by productive coasts.

Introduction

Conventionally, primary production is partitioned between new and regenerated production based on the source of inorganic nitrogen:1 new production (NP) is fueled by N (nitrogen) input from external sources (e.g., upwelled nitrate and N2-fixation) while regenerated production (RP) comes from the internal recycling of nitrogen (e.g., ammonium). While RP often supports the vast majority of total primary production in open-ocean ecosystems, new nitrogen sources (NP) are necessary to support nitrogen and carbon export into the deep sea because the mass fluxes into and out of a system must balance when integrated over sufficiently large spatiotemporal scales. While the NP and RP dichotomy is well established in the simple biogeochemical metric of the f-ratio (=NP/(NP + RP)), direct measurement of NP is complicated by the intrinsic complexities of nitrogen cycling. For example, the most common NP measurement technique, nitrate uptake incubations, assumes negligible rates of nitrification (i.e., oxidation of ammonium into nitrate) within the euphotic zone. Nitrification, which regenerates nitrate from ammonium, may at times be a dominant source of nitrate in surface waters2,3,4,5, especially in oligotrophic waters where ammonium concentrations can exceed those of nitrate. Additionally, strong gradients in organic matter concentrations between coastal and offshore environments provide significant lateral transport potential. Through lateral transport, nutrients and organic matter can be carried into the offshore region, although this flux is seldom included in NP calculations. Modeling studies have suggested that net offshore fluxes can be an important addition to regional N balances, supporting 24–80% of total export in subtropical gyres6,7. However, lateral transport is difficult to constrain because spatiotemporal scales of advection are usually poorly matched to those of direct field measurements.

While numerous biogeochemical budgets have been reported for the shallow shelves of the GoM8,9,10,11, few studies have focused on the oceanic region that covers ~2/3rds of the GoM surface area. Data presented here were collected during two field campaigns of Bluefin Larvae in Oligotrophic Ocean Foodwebs: Investigating Nutrients to Zooplankton in the GoM (BLOOFINZ-GoM) program targeting the central GoM spawning grounds of the endangered Atlantic Bluefin tuna12,13. Major euphotic zone C and N cycling processes were quantified during five Lagrangian studies14,15,16,17, allowing us to compile comprehensive biogeochemical budgets. Here, we combine these in situ measurements with independent remote-sensing observations and a biogeochemical model to test alternate hypotheses that (1) locally upwelled nitrate, (2) N2-fixation, or (3) lateral transport support N export from oligotrophic oceanic waters of the GoM.

Results and discussion

Field observations and dynamics

Nitrate+nitrite (hereafter nitrate) and ammonium were generally < 100 nM throughout the euphotic zone, with nitrate concentrations between the detection limit (~10 nM) and 50 nM in the upper euphotic zone (UEZ; 0–60 m) (Fig. 1b). Nitrate concentrations remained depressed well below the lower euphotic zone (LEZ), with 2.5–12 µM concentrations at 150 m, consistent with prior characterizations of these water masses (ref. 18 and references therein). Ammonium averaged 60 nM, with no depth trend in the euphotic zone (Supplemental Fig. 1a). UEZ chlorophyll-a was consistently below 0.2 mg m−3 (Fig. 1c), and UEZ integrated nitrogen pools did not vary significantly throughout the Lagrangian experiments (Supplemental Fig. 1c–e). Most (62–79%) net primary production (NPP) occurred in the UEZ, with a surface maximum of 270–550 µmol C m−3 d−1. In the LEZ, including the deep chlorophyll maximum (DCM), NPP declined to ~100 µmol C m−3 d−1 (Fig. 1d). Nitrate uptake rates were not strongly depth-dependent, with maximum rates typically observed between 20 and 60 m and vertically integrated rates of 440–1400 µmol N m−2 d−1 in UEZ and 260–2050 µmol N m−2 d−1 in LEZ. Vertically integrated f-ratios were 0.04–0.14 (mean: 0.07) in the UEZ and 0.03–0.44 (mean: 0.14) for the LEZ. Although nitrification was not directly measured, ammonium-specific rates from other oligotrophic studies (0.02–0.5 d−1; ref. 3 and references within) suggest potential nitrate sources of 1 and 30 µmol N m−3 d−1, which could supply the majority of nitrate utilized by the phytoplankton community.

Fig. 1: Overview of in situ data.
figure 1

a Study locations in the central Gulf of Mexico (GOM; colored drift trajectories) with a white outline indicating the integration volume from surface to 55 m considered as representative of the eastern Central GoM (depths >2000 m, outside the general flow of the loop current). b Vertical profiles of nitrate concentrations with inset detailing low surface concentrations. c Vertical profiles of chlorophyll concentrations as recorded by calibrated fluorometer. d Vertical profiles of net primary productivity and e vertical profiles of particulate nitrogen export at three depths: upper euphotic zone, lower euphotic zone, and 200 m. Colors correspond to Lagrangian experiments, and error bars indicate ± 1 SD of means for measurements during experiments.

Gravitational export of organic matter from the UEZ14 (at 60 m) ranged from 590 to 1530 µmol N m−2 d−1 and generally decreased with depth (460–1140 µmol N m−2 d−1 at the base of the euphotic zone; 190–400 µmol N m−2 d−1 at 200 m; Figs. 1e and 2a). UEZ export was 164% (range: 90–330%) that of LEZ, indicating significant consumption of sinking particles within the LEZ. Active export of euphotic zone N due to ammonium excretion of migratory zooplankton at depth ranged from 20 to 172 µmol N m−2 d−1 (mean: 71 µmol N m−2 d−1; Fig. 2b). This underestimates in situ active transport since organic excretion and zooplankton mortality at depth are not considered19.

Fig. 2: Summary of observed euphotic zone nitrogen fluxes from the oligotrophic Gulf of Mexico.
figure 2

a Sediment trap fluxes include export at the base of the upper euphotic zone (UEZ) (open squares) and lower euphotic zone (LEZ; closed circles). b Zooplankton excretion below the euphotic zone. c Vertical mixing of nitrate into the LEZ. Mixing into UEZ not shown (~0). d N2-fixation rates modeled from observed Trichodesmium biomass (UEZ; circles) and from δ15N-based budgets for the entire euphotic zone (squares) as reported in Knapp et al15. Fluxes < 0.1 µmol N m−2 d−1 are shown on left as open symbols. Colors correspond to experiment as indicated with error bars indicating ± 1 SD of measurement means (ac) or reported ranges (d).

The abundance of Trichodesmium20, a dominant diazotroph in the GoM, ranged from 0 to 19 trichomes L−1, which based on a photo-fixation model21, implies maximum N2-fixation rates of between 0 and 0.38 µmol N m−3 d−1 and vertically integrated fixation rates of 0.4–2.8 µmol N m−2 d−1 in the UEZ (Fig. 2d). While lower than in some other regions22,23, such rates are consistent with Northern GoM findings15,24 and the low cell densities observed. Furthermore, the isotopic signature of sinking particulate N (i.e., δ15N) was nearly identical to that of subsurface nitrate15, leaving little room in the δ15N budget for N2-fixation (see Supplemental Discussion).

Thorpe-scale analysis25 of vertical eddy diffusivity in the LEZ ranged from 10−6 to 10−4 m2 s−1, which, combined with the small observed gradients in NO3 concentration, yields LEZ flux estimates of 0.01–1 µmol N m−2 d−1 (Fig. 2c; Supplemental Fig. 2). UEZ nitrate gradients were ~0, constraining vertical nitrate fluxes to 0.01 µmol N m−2 d−1 (Supplemental Fig. 2). Although vertical diffusivities can vary significantly in space and time, the stratification strength and vertical diffusivities for our field study are consistent with independent estimates from the NEMURO-GOM biogeochemical model and with previously reported values26.

As vertical mixing of nitrate and N2-fixation individually provide enough N to support <1% of sinking PON flux in our Lagrangian experiments, locally sourced new N appears insufficient to balance the measured rates of PON export. Instead, a significant role of lateral transport of organic material is suggested by the rapid horizontal displacements in our drifter experiments (up to 60 km d−1) and the strong coastal-offshore particulate gradients in the GoM (Supplemental Figs. 34). We tested this hypothesis with independent approaches of satellite remote-sensing products and a biogeochemical model tuned to the open-ocean GoM.

Lateral supply of nitrogen

MODIS Aqua27 and Terra28 remote-sensing products provide spatial POM data to infer lateral gradients in the GoM. Combined with a remote-sensing circulation product, OSCAR29, we calculate lateral fluxes of particulate organic nitrogen (PON) in the UEZ. Independently, results from a 3D, nitrogen-currency biogeochemical model (NEMURO-GOM30) are used to resolve lower trophic level dynamics in the open-ocean GoM. Notably, NEMURO-GOM was developed to accurately simulate zooplankton dynamics (and hence was primarily compared to zooplankton observations). The MODIS POM and OSCAR circulation products were not used by NEMURO-GoM.

The interannual median UEZ lateral transport of PON (i.e., organisms and detritus) into the central GoM zone (Figs. 1a and 3) is estimated to be equivalent to a flux of 1150 µmol N m−2 d−1 (IQR: 610–1530 µmol N m−2 d−1) and 1165 µmol N m−2 d−1 (IQR: 700–1725 µmol N m−2 d−1) by remote-sensing and NEMURO-GOM, respectively. Both estimates (Fig. 3) indicate that lateral transport of PON alone is sufficient to support sediment trap-derived export out of the UEZ (median: 980 µmol N m−2 d−1; range: 587–1526 µmol N m−2 d−1) and the LEZ (median: 520 µmol N m−2 d−1; range: 462–1144 µmol N m−2 d−1). DON contributed an additional −8 – 46% to total UEZ lateral transport within NEMURO-GOM for any given day (Fig. 3), while lateral transport of DIN (nitrate+ammonium), generally found in diminishingly low concentrations in these waters (Fig. 1a; ref. 15), was uniformly low in the UEZ and represented ~5% of net nitrogen transport regionally. Substantial agreement between these two distinct types of models is remarkable considering that even the physical circulation fields are unique to each model (global HYCOM for NEMURO-GOM; OSCAR circulation for satellite models). Taken together, these results clearly indicate that net lateral transport of organic matter is of sufficient magnitude to support open-ocean export in the GoM.

Fig. 3: Comparison of lateral nitrogen supply to observed export production in the upper euphotic zone.
figure 3

Satellite lateral particulate organic nitrogen (PON) flux was calculated from 8-day composite Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS) Terra/Aqua imagery during the month of May (2002–2019) with flow fields prescribed by OSCAR circulation. NEMURO-GOM fluxes were calculated separately for each nitrogen pool (italicized) and summed for total lateral fluxes. NEMURO-GOM vertical fluxes are integrated for the upper euphotic zone and include upwelling and turbulent mixing but not export by sinking particles. Positive flux values indicate net input into the integration volume. Flux values are normalized to lateral area. Boxes were determined from the 25th, 50th, and 75th percentile of the data, with whiskers indicating the limits of data extending 1.5x the interquartile range of the data.

Circulation patterns in NEMURO-GOM suggest that the open-ocean GoM is predominately a downwelling region and thus an organic nitrogen sink. In the absence of significant vertical input of subsurface nitrate into the LEZ or recently fixed nitrogen into the UEZ, particulate N export can only be supported by either lateral transport or a non-steady state drawdown of bioavailable nitrogen. Since the latter was not observed during any of our five, 4-day Lagrangian experiments (Supplemental Fig. 1c–e), lateral input is likely to be responsible for ~100 % of export out of the UEZ and >90% of export out of the LEZ (Fig. 4). While episodic transport events such as storms have been shown to be relevant in other regions31,32, the impact of such transient processes on the N balance of open-ocean GoM is likely negligible in late spring and summer due to the very deep nitracline (80–125 m). Such second-order processes are likely more important near the shelves where nitracline and mixed layer depths are closer than in the experimental sites themselves. What is clear in the open-ocean GoM is the prevalence of mesoscale eddies formed through instabilities in the Loop Current33 (Supplemental Figs. 3 and 4). Previous studies have found that, through both enhanced surface velocities and long persistence, such mesoscale features can transport large volumes of water onto and off of the shelf34,35,36.

Fig. 4: Schematic of transport mechanisms and fluxes of the northeast Gulf of Mexico.
figure 4

a Arrows and values and fluxes observed or estimated from model relative to euphotic zone net primary productivity including turbulent mixing (purple), N2-fixation (blue), lateral transport (green), gravitational sinking (gray) and primary production (black). Upper and lower euphotic zones are indicated. b Monthly surface snapshot of nitrogen inventories for May 1993 in NEMURO-GOM.

These lateral fluxes likely have implications for the entire GoM food web. Organismal carbon budgets suggest that carnivorous metazooplankton in the GoM may rely on subsidies of prey advected from the coast/shelf break region37. An individual-based model developed for Atlantic bluefin tuna larvae suggests that shelf break regions with strong offshore flow may be particularly important spawning locations that allow first-feeding larvae to find sufficient prey while transporting older larvae to low-predator regions38. Indeed, back-trajectories showed that locations with high larval abundance on the BLOOFINZ-GoM cruises were associated with water recently advected from more productive shelf break regions39. Thus, while much work is needed to elucidate relationships between specific taxa and nitrogen sources to the ecosystem, preliminary evidence shows that lateral transport is crucial to multiple trophic levels in the GoM.

Global connections and implications

Since the oligotrophic GoM has previously been compared to the mid-ocean gyres due to similar biogeochemical properties (e.g., DCM, oligotrophic, low biomass)20,30,40, it may be reasonable to consider the applicability of our results to these oceanic regions. The mid-ocean gyres are both larger than the GoM and may have less average kinetic energy (leading to circulation time-scales of months-years, rather than weeks). Consequently, lateral PON fluxes are likely weaker in gyres but may be compensated, in part, by greater DON flux contributions7. Indeed DON inputs from lateral advection, entrainment, and mixing have been shown to supply gyre interiors41,42, and based on model results may support 40–70% of export production in the North Atlantic gyre43. Furthermore, export efficiency (i.e., export/NPP) is lower in the subtropical gyres (~5%) than measured in our study (11–25%) indicating a reduced lateral input requirement to support gyre export. Taken together, these analyses suggest that lateral transport of organic matter could potentially be a dominant source of external nitrogen in the oligotrophic gyres, as it is in the GoM.

Our results highlight the importance of inter-disciplinary and integrative process studies for constraining biogeochemical fluxes. Among still unresolved issues, it is not clear whether the laterally transported organic matter was originally supported by nitrate from the shelf, upwelling at the shelf break, upwelling associated with mesoscale features, or from some combination of these. Furthermore, extrapolating our results to other time periods and conditions (e.g., winter) in the GoM should be done with caution and appropriate field measurements. Nevertheless, our results clearly highlight the importance of accounting for contributions of lateral transport to carbon and nitrogen budgets in oligotrophic ocean regions and the role that horizontal mesoscale currents have in supporting vulnerable open-ocean GoM ecosystems.

Methods

Sampling plan and environmental sampling

Data were collected during two cruises in the Northern Gulf of Mexico conducted in May 2017 and April/May 201839. Each cruise began with a bongo survey of water parcels that were identified by remote sensing as having favorable SST and vorticity12 for larval Atlantic Bluefin Tuna (ABT). At selected locations, a sediment trap array was deployed and a Lagrangian experiment was initiated. Over the following 3–4 days, the water parcel was repeatedly sampled for biogeochemical properties and incubations were conducted to measure process rates. Throughout an experiment, profiles of temperature and salinity were taken 3–4 times per day through the upper 200 m. Additionally, PAR profiles were conducted at least once per Lagrangian experiment around local noon. Ambient nutrient concentrations were determined from samples collected daily from 6 depths throughout the euphotic zone (same depths as incubations were conducted). The concentrations of nitrate+nitrite were measured using a chemiluminescent method, while concentrations of NH4+ were measured using the fluorescent OPA method. See Knapp et al.15 for details.

Trichodesmium abundance and N2 fixation

Trichodesmium abundance and chlorophyll contents were assessed as reported in Selph et al.20. Briefly, 6.6 L samples from daily noon casts at 6 depths (2–50 m) were collected and filtered through inline 8-µm, 47-mm filters, preserved (2% paraformaldehyde), and frozen (−80 °C). Trichodesmium were counted with microscopy (10–30X magnification) under 440–460 nm excitation to detect orange-fluorescing trichomes. For chlorophyll a contents, separate samples (6.6 L) were collected onto 20 µm, 47-mm filters and frozen (−80 °C). Individual trichomes were picked from thawed filters, extracted (90% acetone), and chlorophyll fluorescence measured with 10-AU (Turner Designs) fluorometer44. Chlorophyll-specific N2-fixation rates were calculated based on the photo-fixation model of Breitbarth et al.21) based on culture work conducted at temperatures (i.e., 26 °C) and photoperiods (i.e., 12 h) consistent with in situ conditions observed.

Productivity and nutrient dynamics

Rates of net primary production (NPP) and nitrate uptake were measured at 6 depths spanning the euphotic zone each day of a Lagrangian experiment. Incubation bottles (2.7 L) were filled by Niskin rosette and then H13CO3 (final concentration: 154 or 196 μmol L−1 on NF1704 and NF1802, respectively) and/or 15NO3 (final concentration: 10 or 8 nmol L−1 on NF1704 and NF1802, respectively) was added. Bottles were then incubated in mesh bags attached to an in situ drift array45 for 24 h—drift array was deployed and recovered pre-dawn, typically ~0500 local time. Upon recovery, incubation bottles were immediately filtered onto precombusted GF/F. Filtered samples were kept at −80 °C until analysis. In addition to in situ incubations, a series of deck-board experiments were conducted for 4–6 h to measure vertical patterns and diel variability in nitrate (same NO3 spike as above) and ammonium uptake17 (final concentration: 9.8 or 4.6 nmol L−1 on NF1704 and NF1802, respectively). Samples were analyzed at the UC Davis stable isotope facility. Nutrient uptake rates and associated uncertainty were calculated as in Stukel46.

Thorpe scale analysis

Profiles of vertical diffusivity (Kz) were calculated by Thorpe scale analysis25 of CTD-derived density profiles. Thorpe scale analysis estimates turbulent mixing parameters (i.e., vertical eddy diffusivity, Kz) based on the number and size of observed density inversions. Raw Seabird data files were processed based on the recommendations of ref. 25. Resulting profiles of Kz were averaged across all casts during a Lagrangian experiment using the geometric mean (n = 14–26, with decreasing number of casts below the euphotic zone). Nitrate fluxes (FZ) were then calculated using the observed vertical nutrient (NO3) gradients and vertical diffusivity (Eq. 1).

$${F}_{{\rm{z}}}=-{K}_{{\rm{z}}}\left(\frac{{\rm{d}}[{{\rm{NO}}}_{3}^{-}]}{{\rm{dz}}}\right)$$
(1)

Zooplankton abundance, biomass, and migrant excretion

Zooplankton were collected daily from paired day–night tows with a 1-m diameter ring net (200-µm mesh) towed obliquely through the euphotic zone16. The tow contents were filtered through stacked Nitex screens of 5, 2, 1, 0.5, and 0.2-mm Nitex mesh to produce 5 size classes, and carbon, nitrogen, and dry mass for each size class were determined. Active nitrogen transport by daytime excretion of diel migrating mesozooplankton at mesopelagic depths was calculated from the equations of Ikeda47, the biomass differences between paired day and night tows (size-fractioned migrant carbon), the average C values of individual animals in each migrant size fraction48, and the mean temperature in the 300–500 m depth range (~10–12 °C).

Export production by sediment trap

Each sediment trap deployment consisted of three cross-members with 12 Particle Interceptor Tubes49 per depth. Trap depths were determined from CTD fluorescence profiles with one cross member below the mixed layer and within the euphotic zone (60 m), one at the base of the euphotic zone (110–150 m), and one at 230 m. The sediment trap array included a 3-m x 1-m holey sock drogue at 15 m depth50. Sediment trap tubes were filled with a poisoned brine solution. After recovery, the overlying seawater was siphoned off to within 3 cm of the brine interface. The samples were then filtered through a 100-µm filter which was manually inspected under a stereo-microscope (25X) to remove zooplankton swimmers. After washing the >100 µm non-swimmer fraction back into the sample, whole tube contents were filtered onto a pre-combusted GF/F for C and N isotopic analyses.

Analysis

Nitrogen isotopic signatures of new and export production

Mass balance requires that the nitrogen δ15N isotopic signature of export equals the isotopic signature of the source nitrogen. N2-fixation supplies nitrogen with a δ15N of approximately −2–0‰51,52 and vertical mixing of subsurface nitrate would maintain the subsurface isotopic signature: 2.0–3.8‰15. Exported nitrogen (sinking + active transport) was observed to have a δ15N of ~2.9–5‰.

Remote-sensing estimates of transport

Eight-day composites of surface POC concentrations estimated from Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS) Aqua & MODIS Terra were retrieved from the National Aeronautical and Space Administration’s (NASA) data repository27,28 for each May from 2000 to 2019. We assumed that particles had Redfield stoichiometry (106:16, C:N, mol:mol). Remote sensing fields were binned to 8-km x 8-km resolution prior to analysis to reduce noise. Regional circulation was prescribed from OSCAR29, a data-assimilative, remote-sensing data product with 1/3rd degree spatial and 5-day temporal resolution. OSCAR circulation fields were mapped onto the remote-sensing grid using bilinear spatial interpolation and linear temporal interpolation. Fluxes between each grid cell were then calculated for each remote-sensing field (n = 80). The total net flux into the control volume was divided by the area of the control volume for comparison to vertical N flux measurements. Results are shown for the control volume as defined in Fig. 1a.

NEMURO-GOM estimates of transport

The biogeochemical model NEMURO-GoM was used to provide a consistent three-dimensional perspective on nutrient uptake dynamics in the study region. The model consists of 29 z-layers with a vertical resolution of 10 m in the upper 150 m and ~4-km horizontal resolution. NEMURO-GOM is run offline within the MIT general circulation model and forced by daily-averaged flow fields obtained from a data-assimilative HYbrid Coordinate Ocean Model GoM simulation. The model has been extensively validated against nutrient, biomass, and rate measurements and fully resolves a simple nitrogen cycle with 11 state variables consisting of two phytoplankton and three zooplankton functional groups30. Vertical mixing in the model is parameterized based on a nonlocal K-profile parameterization (KPP) mixing scheme from a bulk Richardson number approach that quantifies the importance of stratification and destabilizing shear53. Daily model output for May of 1993 to 2012 were analyzed (n = 571) with flux integrations performed for the same control volumes as used for the remote sensing estimations (Fig. 1a). Mesoscale eddies were identified in daily-averaged model flow fields using the algorithm of Laxenaire et al.54, which utilizes surface velocities along closed contours of SSH to define eddy boundaries. Lateral eddy flux (see Supplemental Discussion) was determined by calculating the net flux into the control column for all model grid cells that were identified as located within an eddy (i.e., enclosed SSH contour with the greatest velocity).

Data availability

The data that support the findings of this work are available from the cited and publicly available repositories, including MODIS (NASA), OSCAR (ESR), and field data (BCO-DMO), or upon request to the author (NEMURO-GOM).

Code availability

Codes used in the preparation of this manuscript are freely available under a Creative Commons license at the following url: https://github.com/tbrycekelly/Lateral-connectivity-in-the-gom, ref. 55, and from the author upon request.

References

  1. Harrison, W. G., Platt, T. & Lewis, M. R. f-Ratio and its relationship to ambient nitrate concentration in coastal waters. J. Plankton Res. 9, 235–248 (1987).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Wankel, S. D., Kendall, C., Pennington, J. T., Chavez, F. P. & Paytan, A. Nitrification in the euphotic zone as evidenced by nitrate dual isotopic composition: observations from Monterey Bay, California. Glob. Biogeochem. Cycles 21, 1–13 (2007).

  3. Yool, A., Martin, A. P., Fernández, C. & Clark, D. R. The significance of nitrification for oceanic new production. Nature 447, 999–1002 (2007).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Martens-Habbena, W., Berube, P. M., Urakawa, H., de la Torre, J. R. & Stahl, D. A. Ammonia oxidation kinetics determine niche separation of nitrifying Archaea and bacteria. Nature 461, 976–979 (2009).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Dore, J. E. & Karl, D. M. Nitrification in the euphotic zone as a source for nitrite, nitrate, and nitrous oxide at station ALOHA. Limnol. Oceanogr. 41, 1619–1628 (1996).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Williams, R. G. & Follows, M. J. The Ekman transfer of nutrients and maintenance of new production over the North Atlantic. Deep Sea Res. Part I 45, 461–489 (1998).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Letscher, R. T., Primeau, F. & Moore, J. K. Nutrient budgets in the subtropical ocean gyres dominated by lateral transport. Nat. Geosci. 9, 815–819 (2016).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Xue, Z. et al. Modeling ocean circulation and biogeochemical variability in the Gulf of Mexico. Biogeosciences 10, 7219–7234 (2013).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Fennel, K. & Laurent, A. N and P as ultimate and proximate limiting nutrients in the northern Gulf of Mexico: implications for hypoxia reduction strategies. Biogeosciences 15, 3121–3131 (2018).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Laurent, A., Fennel, K., Ko, D. S. & Lehrter, J. Climate change projected to exacerbate impacts of coastal eutrophication in the northern Gulf of Mexico. J. Geophys. Res. Oceans 123, 3408–3426 (2018).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Fichot, C. G., Lohrenz, S. E. & Benner, R. Pulsed, cross-shelf export of terrigenous dissolved organic carbon to the Gulf of Mexico. J. Geophys. Res. Oceans 119, 1176–1194 (2014).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Domingues, R. et al. Variability of preferred environmental conditions for Atlantic bluefin tuna (Thunnus thynnus) larvae in the Gulf of Mexico during 1993–2011. Fish. Oceanogr. 25, 320–336 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Landry, M. R., Beckley, L. E. & Muhling, B. A. Climate sensitivities and uncertainties in food-web pathways supporting larval bluefin tuna in subtropical oligotrophic oceans. ICES J. Mar. Sci. 76, 359–369 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Stukel, M. R., Kelly, T. B., Landry, M. R., Selph, K. E. & Swalethorp, R. Sinking carbon, nitrogen, and pigment flux within and beneath the euphotic zone in the oligotrophic, open-ocean Gulf of Mexico. J. Plankton Res. (in press).

  15. Knapp, A. N. et al. Constraining the sources of nitrogen fueling export production in the Gulf of Mexico using nitrogen isotope budgets. J. Plankton Res. (submitted).

  16. Landry, M. R. et al. Microbial Food Web Dynamics in the Oceanic Gulf of Mexico. J. Plankton Res. (submitted).

  17. Yingling, N. et al. Taxon-specific phytoplankton growth, nutrient limitation, and light limitation in the oligotrophic Gulf of Mexico. J. Plankton Res. (2021).

  18. Howe, S., Miranda, C., Hayes, C. T., Letscher, R. T. & Knapp, A. N. The dual isotopic composition of nitrate in the Gulf of Mexico and Florida straits. J. Geophys. Res. Oceans 125, (2020).

  19. Stukel, M. R. et al. Plankton food webs of the Gulf of Mexico spawning grounds of Atlantic Bluefin tuna. J. Plankton Res. (in press).

  20. Selph, K. E. et al. Phytoplankton assemblages in the open ocean water of the Gulf of Mexico during May 2017 and 2018. J. Plankton Res. (in press).

  21. Breitbarth, E., Wohlers, J., Kläs, J., LaRoche, J. & Peeken, I. Nitrogen fixation and growth rates of Trichodesmium IMS-101 as a function of light intensity. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 359, 25–36 (2008).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Mulholland, M. R. et al. High rates of N2 fixation in temperate, western north Atlantic coastal waters expand the realm of marine diazotrophy. Glob. Biogeochem. Cycles 33, 826–840 (2019).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Tang, W. et al. Revisiting the distribution of oceanic N2 fixation and estimating diazotrophic contribution to marine production. Nat. Commun. 10, 831 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Holl, C. M. et al. Trichodesmium in the western Gulf of Mexico: 15N 2-fixation and natural abundance stable isotopic evidence. Limnol. Oceanogr. 52, 2249–2259 (2007).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Gargett, A. & Garner, T. Determining Thorpe scales from ship-lowered CTD density profiles. J. Atmos. Ocean. Technol. 25, 1657–1670 (2008).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Whitt, D. B., Lévy, M. & Taylor, J. R. Submesoscales enhance storm‐driven vertical mixing of nutrients: insights from a biogeochemical large eddy simulation. J. Geophys. Res. Oceans 124, 8140–8165 (2019).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  27. NASA Ocean Biology Processing Group. MODIS-Aqua Level 3 Mapped Particulate Organic Carbon Data Version R2018.0. (2017) https://doi.org/10.5067/AQUA/MODIS/L3M/POC/2018.

  28. NASA Ocean Biology Processing Group. MODIS-TERRA Level 3 Mapped Particulate Organic Carbon Data Version R2018.0. (2018) https://doi.org/10.5067/TERRA/MODIS/L3M/POC/2018.

  29. E. S. R. OSCAR third degree resolution ocean surface currents. Ver. 1. (2009).

  30. Shropshire, T. A. et al. Quantifying spatiotemporal variability in zooplankton dynamics in the Gulf of Mexico with a physical–biogeochemical model. Biogeosciences 17, 3385–3407 (2020).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Klein, P. & Coste, B. Effects of wind-stress variability on nutrient transport into the mixed layer. Deep Sea Res. Part Oceanogr. Res. Pap. 31, 21–37 (1984).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Rumyantseva, A. et al. Ocean nutrient pathways associated with the passage of a storm. Glob. Biogeochem. Cycles 29, 1179–1189 (2015).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Oey, L.-Y., Ezer, T. & Lee, H.-C. Geophysical Monograph Series (eds Sturges, W. & Lugo-Fernandez, A.) Vol 161, pp. 31–56 (American Geophysical Union, Washington DC, 2013).

  34. Sahl, L. E., Wiesenburg, D. A. & Merrell, W. J. Interactions of mesoscale features with Texas shelf and slope waters. Cont. Shelf Res. 17, 117–136 (1997).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Toner, M. Chlorophyll dispersal by eddy-eddy interactions in the Gulf of Mexico. J. Geophys. Res. 108, 3105 (2003).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Barkan, R. et al. Submesoscale dynamics in the northern Gulf of Mexico. Part II: temperature–salinity relations and cross-shelf transport processes. J. Phys. Oceanogr. 47, 2347–2360 (2017).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Landry, M. R. & Swalethorp, R. Mesozooplankton biomass, grazing and trophic structure in the bluefin tuna spawning area of the oceanic Gulf of Mexico. J. Plankton Res. 00, 1–15 (2021).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Shropshire, T. A. et al. Trade-offs between risks of predation and starvation in larvae make the shelf break an optimal spawning location for Atlantic Bluefin tuna. J. Plankton Res. (in review).

  39. Gerard, T. et al. Bluefin larvae in oligotrophic ocean foodwebs, investigations of nutrients to zooplankton: overview of the BLOOFINZ-Gulf of Mexico program. J. Plankton Res. (in review).

  40. Gomez, F. A. et al. Seasonal patterns in phytoplankton biomass across the northern and deep Gulf of Mexico: a numerical model study. Biogeosciences 15, 3561–3576 (2018).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Roussenov, V., Williams, R. G., Mahaffey, C. & Wolff, G. A. Does the transport of dissolved organic nutrients affect export production in the Atlantic Ocean? Glob. Biogeochem. Cycles 20, (2006).

  42. Oschlies, A. Nutrient supply to the surface waters of the North Atlantic: A model study. J. Geophys. Res. 107, 3046 (2002).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Torres-Valdés, S. et al. Distribution of dissolved organic nutrients and their effect on export production over the Atlantic Ocean. Glob. Biogeochem. Cycles 23, 1–14 (2009).

  44. Strickland, J. D. H. & Parsons, T. R. A Practical handbook of Seawater Analysis (Fisheries Research Board of Canada, 1972).

  45. Landry, M. R., Ohman, M. D., Goericke, R., Stukel, M. R. & Tsyrklevich, K. Lagrangian studies of phytoplankton growth and grazing relationships in a coastal upwelling ecosystem off Southern California. Prog. Oceanogr. 83, 208–216 (2009).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Stukel, M. R. Investigating equations for measuring dissolved inorganic nutrient uptake in oligotrophic conditions. Limnol. Oceanogr. Methods 18, 656–672 (2020).

  47. Ikeda, T. Metabolic rates of epipelagic marine zooplankton as a function of body mass and temperature. Mar. Biol. 85, 1–11 (1985).

  48. Landry, M. R., Al-Mutairi, H., Selph, K. E., Christensen, S. & Nunnery, S. Seasonal patterns of mesozooplankton abundance and biomass at Station ALOHA. Deep Sea Res. Part II Top. Stud. Oceanogr. 48, 2037–2061 (2001).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Knauer, G. A., Martin, J. H. & Bruland, K. W. Fluxes of particulate carbon, nitrogen, and phosphorus in the upper water column of the northeast Pacific. Deep Sea Res. Part Oceanogr. Res. Pap. 26, 97–108 (1979).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Stukel, M., Ohman, M., Benitez-Nelson, C. & Landry, M. Contributions of mesozooplankton to vertical carbon export in a coastal upwelling system. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 491, 47–65 (2013).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Carpenter, E. J., Harvey, H. R., Fry, B. & Capone, D. G. Biogeochemical tracers of the marine cyanobacterium Trichodesmium. Deep Sea Res. Part II 44, 27–38 (1997).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Minagawa, M. & Wada, E. Nitrogen isotope ratios of red tide organisms in the East China Sea: a characterization of biological nitrogen fixation. Mar. Chem. 19, 245–259 (1986).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  53. Large, W. G., McWilliams, J. C. & Doney, S. C. Oceanic vertical mixing: a review and a model with a nonlocal boundary layer parameterization. Rev. Geophys. 32, 363 (1994).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  54. Laxenaire, R. et al. Anticyclonic Eddies connecting the western boundaries of indian and atlantic oceans. J. Geophys. Res. Oceans 123, 7651–7677 (2018).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  55. Kelly, T. B. Lateral advection supports nitrogen export in the oligotrophic open-ocean Gulf of Mexico. Zenodo https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4726340 (2021).

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank the captain and crew of the NOAA Ship Nancy Foster for providing their assistance in conducting the fieldwork that led to this manuscript. We also thank our collaborators and colleagues at NOAA Southeast Fisheries/RSMAS/University of Miami for helping plan and carry out two successful field campaigns. We would like to thank Remi Laxenaire for his assistance in the identification of eddies. This study acknowledges BLOOFINZ Program support from National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration awards NA15OAR4320071 (CIMEAS), NA16NMF4320058 (JIMAR), NA15OAR4320064 (CIMAS), and U.S. National Science Foundation awards OCE-1851347 and OCE-1851558. We also acknowledge support from the National High Magnetic Field Laboratory NSF/DMR-1644779 and the State of Florida.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

T.B.K. and M.R.S. planned and synthesized the data presented here. T.B.K., M.R.L., K.E.S., T.A.S., R.K.T. and M.R.S. collected the field data. A.N.K. provided nutrient data for the analysis. T.A.S. designed the hydrodynamic model and provided output data. T.B.K. wrote the manuscript. All authors took part in editing and submission of the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Thomas B. Kelly.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Peer review information Nature Communications thanks Wei-Lei Wang and other, anonymous, reviewers for their contributions to the peer review of this work. Peer review reports are available.

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kelly, T.B., Knapp, A.N., Landry, M.R. et al. Lateral advection supports nitrogen export in the oligotrophic open-ocean Gulf of Mexico. Nat Commun 12, 3325 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-021-23678-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-021-23678-9

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing