Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

# Robust coherent control of solid-state spin qubits using anti-Stokes excitation

## Abstract

Optically addressable solid-state color center spin qubits have become important platforms for quantum information processing, quantum networks and quantum sensing. The readout of color center spin states with optically detected magnetic resonance (ODMR) technology is traditionally based on Stokes excitation, where the energy of the exciting laser is higher than that of the emission photons. Here, we investigate an unconventional approach using anti-Stokes excitation to detect the ODMR signal of silicon vacancy defect spin in silicon carbide, where the exciting laser has lower energy than the emitted photons. Laser power, microwave power and temperature dependence of the anti-Stokes excited ODMR are systematically studied, in which the behavior of ODMR contrast and linewidth is shown to be similar to that of Stokes excitation. However, the ODMR contrast is several times that of the Stokes excitation. Coherent control of silicon vacancy spin under anti-Stokes excitation is then realized at room temperature. The spin coherence properties are the same as those of Stokes excitation, but with a signal contrast that is around three times greater. To illustrate the enhanced spin readout contrast under anti-Stokes excitation, we also provide a theoretical model. The experiments demonstrate that the current anti-Stokes excitation ODMR approach has promising applications in quantum information processing and quantum sensing.

## Introduction

Color centers in wide-bandgap semiconductors have been widely used in quantum networks1,2,3,4,5, quantum information processing6,7,8,9,10, and quantum sensing11,12,13,14,15,16,17 owing to their stable fluorescence properties and long spin coherence time even at room temperature10,13. Spins of color centers can be polarized by laser and manipulated by microwave (MW), allowing a readout approach operating on spin-dependent fluorescence detection1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10. Optically detected magnetic resonance (ODMR) technology can be used on this basis to detect the spin state, which is the foundation for applications of quantum technology1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17. However, previously, almost all ODMR readout protocols have used conventional Stokes excitation, in which the wavelength of the excitation laser is shorter than the zero phonon lines (ZPLs) of the color centers. Investigation of additional spin readout protocols could significantly extend the scope of solid-state quantum technologies. For example, photocurrent detection of magnetic resonance (PDMR) has been demonstrated and implemented in both nitrogen-vacancy (NV) centers in diamond and defects in silicon carbide (SiC) based on spin-dependent ionization dynamics, which benefits device integration18,19. However, PDMR usually requires complex doping and nano-fabrication technologies, and the output signal has to be increased18,19.

On the other hand, the anti-Stokes (AS) excitation process, in which the wavelength of the exciting laser is longer than that of the emitted photons, has been observed in quantum dots, dye molecules, and rare-earth doped crystals suited for applications, including Raman spectroscopy and laser cooling20,21. The mechanisms of AS excitation have been clarified, such as multiphoton absorption, phonon absorption, and Auger recombination20,21. Most recently, it has been also observed in the color centers of diamond and defects in hexagonal boron nitride (hBN)20,21. These were shown to be helpful in all-optical temperature sensing and manipulating emissions of quantum emitters20,21. However, there are still no published studies on ODMR detection and coherent manipulation of solid-state spin states under AS excitation. The realization of spin readout with AS excitation would broaden the boundary of quantum technologies based on solid-state spin qubits.

In recent years, color centers in SiC have been studied as promising candidates for bright single photon sources22,23 and spin qubits8,9,10. In contrast to diamond, SiC is a technology-friendly semiconductor with mature micro–nano fabrication and inch-scale growth technologies. Optically addressable spin qubits, including silicon vacancy (VSi) defects4,10, divacancy8,9, NV centers24,25,26, in SiC have drawn much attention due to their near-infrared and even telecom-ranged fluorescence and long spin coherence time4,9,10,24,25,26. These superior characteristics make them extensively applicable to quantum information processing8,9,10, spin–photon interfaces4,5, and quantum metrology, such as magnetic field15, electric field16, and temperature17.

In this work, we realize the coherent control of VSi defect ensemble spins in 4H-SiC under AS excitation at room temperature. First, AS photoluminescence (PL) is investigated as a function of AS exciting laser power, temperature, and duration times, showing that AS PL is caused by the phonon-assisted single photon absorption process. On this basis, the Stokes and AS excited ODMR spectra are obtained for different excitation laser power, MW power, and temperature, which are shown to follow similar behavior. We then measured the external magnetic field-dependent Stokes and AS ODMR, both of which exhibit the same Zeeman splitting phenomena. Finally, a comparison of the free induction decay and spin echo of VSi defects under Stokes and AS excitation reveals that AS excitation does not affect the coherent properties of VSi defects. Hence, the demonstrated AS excited ODMR approach shows potential for quantum information processing and quantum sensing.

## Results

VSi defects are point defects containing a silicon vacancy, which exist in 4H-SiC and 6H-SiC. In 4H-SiC, two forms of VSi defects exist due to discrepancies in the silicon vacancy lattice: V1 and V2 centers have corresponding ZPLs of 861 and 915 nm, respectively. Since the spin of the V2 center can be manipulated at room temperature, we focus only on the V2 center of the VSi defect, which features a S = 3/2 spin quartet and 70 MHz ground state zero field splitting (ZFS). A home-made confocal system combined with a MW system is implemented to excite and manipulate the VSi defect (see details in “Methods”). Lasers with wavelengths of 720 and 1030 nm are used for the Stokes and AS excitation of VSi defects, respectively. A band-pass filter with a transmitting wavelength of 850–1000 nm is used in the confocal set-up. In the experiment, we use a 4H-SiC sample with high-density VSi defect ensembles27 (see details in “Methods”).

The proposed energy model for PL and optically induced spin polarization of the Stokes and AS excitation of VSi defect in 4H-SiC is shown in Fig. 1a20,21,28,29,30,31. The defect has S = 3/2 ground and optically accessible excited state with ms = ±1/2 and ms = ±3/2 spin manifolds. The ground state and the lowest energy S = 3/2 excited state have 4A2 symmetry. In this case, we use a five-level scheme where the series of doublet states is substituted by a single effective doublet state (state 5). The electron may scatter from the excited state spin manifolds (states 3 and 4, i.e., ms = ±1/2 and ms = ±3/2, respectively) to this state or can scatter from this state to the ground state spin manifolds (states 1 and 2, i.e., ms = ±1/2 and ms = ±3/2, respectively). For the usual Stokes excitation (Fig. 1a left part), both the 1 and 2 ground states transmit to the excited states phonon sideband under the laser excitation. Generally, the simple phonon relaxation and excitation processes should be spin-conserving (only contain spin-independent operators). By phonon relaxation, they then rapidly thermalize to the 3 and 4 states respectively, followed by the spin-preserving radiative transition to the ground states (see Supplementary Note 1 for more details). In the AS excitation (Fig. 1a right part), the probability of going from the ground state manifold to the excited state manifold is less than that in the Stokes excitation, since it involves the phonon excitation in the former process. For both the Stokes and AS excitations, we assume that the non-radiative intersystem crossover to the metastable doublet state occurs primarily from state 3, then they polarized to state 130.

We then investigated the AS PL of VSi defects in 4H-SiC. The PL spectra of the VSi defects under Stokes (720 nm, blue) and AS excitation is seen in Fig. 1b (1030 nm, red). Compared with the Stokes PL, the AS excited PL has a small red shift, which is consistent with previous results of NV centers in diamond20. To recognize the origin of the AS PL, we measure counts as a function of laser power (P) of the Stokes and two AS (1030 nm and 1064 nm) excitations (Fig. 1c). The Stokes PL is fitted using the function I(P) = Is/(1 + P0/P), where the maximal count Is is 2350 kcps and the saturation power P0 is 4.3 mW, respectively. However, both of the AS excited counts follow a linear fit, and the counts with 1030 nm laser excitation are 5.5 times larger than that of the 1064 nm laser excitation. The linear laser power-dependent behavior indicates that lower energy single photons rather than double photons are absorbed in the AS excitation process. In comparison, the efficiency of AS excitation becomes higher when the excitation wavelength is closer to the ZPL, which is consistent with that of color centers in diamond20,28 and defects in hBN21. The temperature-dependent AS excitation is investigated to further validate that the AS excitation involves a phonon-assisted process. The AS count scales linearly with the exciting laser power for one-photon absorption, while it scales quadratically for two-photon absorption20,21,28. Figure 1d presents the AS excited counts with respect to laser power at different temperatures, where the counts increase quickly as the temperature rises. At temperatures <365 K, the counts linearly increase with laser power, which indicates that the AS PL is due to the phonon-assisted single low-energy photon absorption process (see Supplementary Note 2). In comparison, at temperatures >365 K, the data were fitted using a function of bPn where the power index n decreases from 0.85 to 0.78 as the temperature increases from 401.7 to 501.4 K and b represents the temperature-dependent increasing parameter21,28. The decrease of the power index n might be attributed to the reduction in efficiency of the phonon-assisted single photon absorption process.

To quantify the AS excitation efficiency, we use the ratio IAS/IS of AS (IAS) to Stokes (IS) excited counts20. A summary of the Stokes and AS excited counts as a function of the temperature is plotted in the lower panel in Fig. 1e. The Stokes excited count IS is almost constant for temperatures varying from 11 to 300 K but declines rapidly as the temperature rises to 500 K. In comparison, when the temperature rises from 11 to 300 K, the AS excitation counts IAS increase slowly and then increase rapidly as the temperature rises to 500 K. The ratio IAS/IS increases slowly as the temperature increase to 300 K, which is shown in the upper panel in Fig. 1e. At room temperature, IAS/IS is around 0.57%, which is approximately 50 times the ratio for NV centers in diamond20. IAS/IS can be further increased using a shorter wavelength of AS excited laser20,21. In addition, IAS/IS increases to 10.4% at 500 K, which is comparable with the silicon vacancy and germanium vacancy in diamond at room temperature20. The dramatic increase in the behavior of IAS/IS at elevated temperatures will be useful for all-optical high temperature sensing20. Combined with SiC nano-particles32, nanoscale temperature sensors usable in living cells and microelectronic systems can be constructed. Through manufacturing photonics structures such as solid immersion lenses10 and so on, it is possible to realize AS excitation of a single VSi defect20. We further investigated the stability of PL under AS excitation at various temperatures. Figure 1f displays the results with five representative temperatures, with all of the counts stable for these temperatures. We also note that the low PL photon counts for the AS approach would limit the application by employing only single emitters, while the quantum-sensing sensitivity can be dramatically increased by a factor of $$\sqrt{N}$$, where N is the number of the color centers33. Ensemble color centers would be useful for high-sensitivity quantum sensing.

On the basis of stable phonon-assisted single photon emission-induced AS PL, we investigate AS excited ODMR of VSi defect ensemble and compare it with Stokes excited ODMR. Figure 2a shows two representative Stokes and AS excited ODMR spectra at different laser powers with the same MW power, which is characterized by the Rabi frequency and the value is read as 1.03 MHz. The contrast of both the Stokes and AS excited ODMR at 4 mW laser power is slightly larger than at 10 mW. In addition, under AS excitation, the contrast is around three times that of Stokes excitation. Comparisons of ODMR contrast and linewidth as a function of laser power under Stokes and AS excitation are presented in Fig. 2b, c, respectively. Both the ODMR contrast decreases as the laser power increases, and the AS ODMR contrast remains around three times larger than the Stokes one. Meanwhile, both ODMR linewidths stay almost the same as laser power increases, in line with previous results19. The mean AS excited ODMR linewidth is around 2.2 ± 0.7 MHz smaller than that of the Stokes excitation. For two different MW powers, representative Stokes and AS excited ODMR signals at the same laser power are shown in Fig. 2d. Both the ODMR contrast and linewidth at higher Rabi frequency are larger than that at lower frequency, and the AS excited ODMR contrast values are also much higher than the Stokes ones. However, the ODMR signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) of the AS excitation is still low, which is due to the low AS excited counts and intrinsic low ODMR contrast of the silicon vacancy10,27. Unlike the Stokes excited counts that have smaller saturation power of the Stokes laser, the AS excited counts linearly increase as the AS exciting laser power. In the experiments, we can use a higher laser power (>400 mW) to significantly increase AS excited counts34. In addition, the thermally quenched methods will increase the intrinsic ODMR contrast by about ten times34. So, using the thermally quenched sample and higher AS exciting laser power, the ODMR SNR of the AS excitation will obviously increase34.

Figure 2e, f display a comparison of the ODMR contrast and linewidth under Stokes and AS excitation as a function of MW power. Both the ODMR contrast and linewidth increase as the MW power increases with similar behavior. In comparison, the AS excited ODMR contrast is much higher than that for Stokes excitation, while the linewidth is again lower than the Stokes excitation one. To understand this phenomenon, we assume that the AS excitation energy may excite the electron from a metastable doublet state, selectively, to state 4, which represents a spin-flipping effective optical excitation (see Fig. 1b). In this scenario, the brighter spin state is occupied in the quartet excited state manifold, which contributes to an enhanced AS excited ODMR contrast. We discuss the possible mechanism in detail in the theoretical part.

Since the AS excited PL counts increase rapidly as temperature increases, the temperature dependence of the AS excited ODMR signals has been investigated. Figure 2g shows the resonance frequencies with respect to temperature. The half-integer spin (S = 3/2) of the silicon vacancy in 4H-SiC makes it insensitive to fluctuations in strain, temperature, and electric field35. The resonance frequencies are almost the same under AS and Stokes excitation conditions (the mean difference is around 0.3 ± 0.3 MHz). Different from the behavior of the divacancies in SiC17,36 and NV centers in diamond37,38, both the values are constant as the temperature increases, which is similar to low temperature results39,40,41. The results show that ZFS is almost temperature independent (see Supplementary Note 2)39,40,41, which is useful for temperature-independent quantum sensing such as magnetic field and electric field sensing in broad temperature ranges39,41. A comparison of ODMR contrast and linewidth as a function of temperature is displayed in Fig. 2h, i, respectively. Although the contrast for both cases decreases as temperature increases, the AS excited ODMR contrast is approximately four times that of Stokes as the temperature rises from 297.2 to around 421 K. Moreover, the AS excited ODMR signal can still be detected at 500 K, while the Stokes excited ODMR signal is undetectable at the same experimental conditions. This property is useful for high-temperature quantum sensing, which is not only of interest in extending the scope of quantum sensing but also of practical applications in many important fields of nanotechnology42. Distinct to ODMR contrast, both linewidths are almost constant, with the AS excited ODMR linewidth also smaller than the Stokes excitation one. The results demonstrate that the AS excited ODMR signals are more robust than that of the Stokes excitation.

After optimizing the AS excited ODMR spectrum, we then studied its magnetic field-dependent behavior, which is the basis of quantum sensing. Under an external magnetic field, there are two dipole-allowed transitions $$|-1/2\rangle \leftrightarrow |-3/2\rangle$$ and $$|1/2\rangle \leftrightarrow |3/2\rangle$$, with corresponding transition frequencies of $$|2D-g{\mu }_{\rm{B}}B|$$ and $$|2D+g{\mu }_{\rm{B}}B|$$, respectively. The parameters D, g, μB, and B represent ZFS, Lande g factor, Bohr magneton, and external magnetic field, respectively. Figure 3a exhibits the Stokes and AS excited ODMR spectra for three different c-axis magnetic fields. For convenience, the laser powers for the Stoke and AS cases are set at 1 and 14 mW, respectively, while the MW power is set to be the same. Both Stokes and AS excited ODMR spectra show the same splitting; however, contrast under AS excitation is approximately three times that of Stokes excitation. For example, at the magnetic field of 52 G, the Stokes and AS excited ODMR resonance frequencies are 77.4 (77.8) and 214.1 (213.8) MHz, respectively. A summary of both Stokes and AS excited ODMR resonance frequencies at various magnetic fields is shown in Fig. 3b. The blue lines are the calculated transition frequencies. All the measured resonance frequencies of Stokes and AS excited ODMR coincide and agree well with the calculated results. As with Stokes excited ODMR, the demonstrated AS excited ODMR technology can also be used for direct current magnetic field sensing15.

High-quality coherence properties of solid-state spin qubits are significant for quantum computing8,9,10 and high-sensitivity quantum sensing16,17. In view of this, we study the coherence properties of VSi defects under AS excitation. The experimental coherence control pulse sequences are the same for both the Stokes and AS excitations, which are also the same to the previous standard pulse sequences8,17,25 (see Supplementary Note 3). As shown in Fig. 4a, the Rabi oscillations under Stokes (blue) and AS (red) excitations are measured using a resonant frequency of 77.5 MHz at 52 G with standard Rabi pulse sequences at room temperature17,25. From the fit, the AS excited Rabi frequency is 8.01 ± 0.09 MHz, which is the same as that of Stokes (7.94 ± 0.05 MHz). The contrast of the AS excited Rabi oscillation is around three times that of the Stokes results at the same time. Figure 4b presents the calculated Rabi frequencies at different MW power under Stokes (blue) and AS (red) excitation, respectively. The frequencies are almost the same and linearly increase with the square root of the MW power. The results demonstrate that Rabi oscillation follows the same behavior under MW fields for both Stokes and AS excitations.

To measure the inhomogeneous spin-dephasing time under AS excitation, we employ the standard Ramsey pulse sequence. The comparison of Stokes (blue) and AS (red) excited Ramsey oscillations is presented in Fig. 4c. The spin dephasing time T2* for the AS (Stokes) excitation is 0.38 ± 0.05 μs (0.35 ± 0.04 μs), respectively. The experiments show that the AS excitation method not only does not change the spin-dephasing time but also can increase the signal contrast by approximately three times. We subsequently investigate the AS excited spin coherence time using the spin echo pulse sequence. The AS excited coherence time T2 is found to be 7.1 ± 0.6 μs, which is also consistent with the Stokes value of 6.3 ± 0.4 μs. As with dephasing time, spin coherence time is not affected by the AS excitation method. The comparison of coherent control under Stokes and AS excitations demonstrates that the AS excitation technology does not affect the spin coherence properties. Moreover, it can also increase the signal contrast about three times, which is beneficial for experiments. In addition, coherent control of single VSi defects may also be realized using photon structures at a higher temperature.

### Theoretical analysis on the ODMR contrast

To make the explanation for the increased ODMR contrast for the AS approach as compared to the Stokes approach more clear, we first discuss the relationship of the continuous wave (CW) ODMR contrast between the decay rates with the energy levels shown in Figs. 1a and 5 that we took from first principles calculations43. We label the states with ms manifolds by numbers (see also Supplementary Note 1). For the case of Stokes excitation, radiative decay occurs from state 3 to state 1 and from state 4 to state 2 with the rate of rd. The corresponding intersystem crossing (ISC) rates between states i and j are labeled by rij. The occupation of i level is labeled by ni. The total intensity of fluorescence $$I={I}_{\pm 1/2}+{I}_{\pm 3/2}$$, where

$${I}_{\pm 1/2}=\frac{{n}_{1}{c}_{1}{r}_{{\rm{d}}}}{{r}_{{\rm{d}}}+{r}_{35}}$$
(1)

and

$${I}_{\pm 3/2}=\frac{{n}_{2}{c}_{1}{r}_{{\rm{d}}}}{{r}_{{\rm{d}}}+{r}_{45}}$$
(2)

where c1 is the rate of photo-excitation. In the weak illumination limit, the electron dominantly occupies the ground state spin manifolds, i.e., n1 + n2 ≈ 1, where the spin-polarization P between the states can be expressed as n1 − n2 ≈ P because ms = ±1/2 spin state is spin-polarized according to previous measurements44. Upon illumination with a strength of c1 < rd, the CW ODMR contrast C may be expressed as

$$C=\frac{I(P=0)}{I(P=1)}-1$$
(3)

where Eq. (3) together with Eqs. (1) and (2) simplifies to

$$C=0.5\frac{{r}_{35}-{r}_{45}}{{r}_{{\rm{d}}}+{r}_{45}}$$
(4)

A small positive ODMR contrast is developed by the condition of r35 > r45, i.e., a faster ISC process from the ms = ±1/2 manifold than from the ms = ±3/2 manifold toward the doublet states, which is observed in the experiments.

In the AS excitation, we suppose the simple phonon relaxation and excitation processes should be spin-conserving. As shown in Fig. 1a, the probability to get from the quartet ground state manifold to the quartet excited state manifold is less than that in the Stokes excitation (labeled as c1) because it involves the phonon excitation in the former process. Once the electron decays from the quartet excited state to the lowest energy doublet state, which is a metastable state with relatively long lifetime, the CW laser used for AS excitation may excite the electron from the metastable doublet state, selectively, to state 4 (ms = ±3/2 spin state). The process is represented by a purple arrow in Figs. 1a and 5b, which competes with the decay of the electron from the metastable doublet state to the quartet ground state by ISC. In this scenario, the brighter spin state can be increasingly populated in the quartet excited state manifold (state 4), which leads to an enhanced CW ODMR readout contrast (see also Supplementary Note 1).

The effective spin-flipping optical excitation may be explained by a relatively strong optical excitation between the doublets followed by a spin-selective ISC toward the ms = ±3/2 spin states (see Fig. 5b). The refined model is depicted in Fig. 5a. According to first principles calculations beyond density functional theory43, the lowest energy doublet level (2E) is at about Σ = 0.15 eV above the quartet ground state’s level, which is explicitly given and labeled as state 5’. The AS excitation energy is able to promote this electron to state 6’, which is higher energy doublet state and quasi-degenerate with the quartet levels, depicted explicitly in the series of other doublets. We assume that there is a dominant relaxation path from state 6’ toward the ms = ±3/2 spin states, which is further considered in our analysis. The exact nature of state 6’ is not known at the moment from literature43 but may be associated with a doublet 2E counterpart of the 4E quartet (see the discussion in Supplementary Note 1). The 4E state is the second optically allowed excited state that is separated from the 4A2 state by about 20 meV, and they are strongly coupled by phonons45 (see Fig. 5c). We label the corresponding spin states of 4E manifold as 7 and 8. As the phonon coupling is strong and the phonon decay process is considered to be rapid between states 8 and 4 as well as states 7 and 3 (c.f., Figs. 1a and 5c), the electron then decays either from state 4 or state 3 toward the lower energy doublets by ISC or toward the ground state manifold by emitting photons. Therefore, the corresponding joint states are labeled as 4’ (ms = ±3/2 states) and 3’ (ms = ±1/2 states) in Fig. 5a.

The CW ODMR contrast changes because the optically excited bright ms = ±3/2 spin state can be occupied from the doublets in AS excitation as a new source of the occupation of that state with respect to that of the Stokes excitation. We show this effect briefly by calculating the CW ODMR contrast upon AS illumination with the model sketched in Fig. 5. For the sake of simplicity, the prime labels are omitted in the following equations that describe the possible decay and excitation routes. I±1/2 in Eq. (1) does not change. However, I±3/2 modifies to

$${I}_{\pm 3/2}=\frac{{n}_{2}{c}_{1}{r}_{{\rm{d}}}+{n}_{6}{r}_{64}{r}_{{\rm{d}}}}{{r}_{{\rm{d}}}+{r}_{45}}$$
(5)

where r64 is the ISC rate from state 6’ to state 4’. The occupation of level 6’ (n6) depends on the occupation of level 5’ (n5) and the strength of optical excitation toward state 6’ (c56), which should be much higher than c1 in the AS excitation because it does not require the absorption of phonons (see also Supplementary Note 1). The occupation of levels 5’ and 6’ in the steady state may be given as

$${n}_{5}=\frac{{n}_{3}{r}_{35}+{n}_{4}{r}_{45}}{{r}_{51}+{r}_{52}+{c}_{56}}$$
(6)

and

$${n}_{6}=\frac{{n}_{5}{c}_{56}}{{r}_{63}+{r}_{65}}$$
(7)

By assuming that r64 is large (fast ISC because of the resonance conditions and sufficiently large spin–orbit interaction)45, one can again assume n1 + n2 ≈ 1 and n1 − n2 ≈ P similarly to the case of Stokes excitation. By combining Eqs. (1), (6), and (7), one can express Eq. (5) as a function of n1 and n2, where the contrast is again defined by Eq. (3). Finally, the calculated CW ODMR contrast of AS excitation will be larger than that for Stokes excitation because I(P = 1/2) is unchanged but I(P = 3/2) increases because of the increase in I±3/2. We note that this basic result is not altered by considering a weak scattering from the state 6’ toward 3’ (r63 < r64), which is ignored now for the sake of clarity.

We further note that an additional effect may contribute to the enhanced CW ODMR contrast upon AS excitation (see Fig. 5d). Because the system is spin-polarized to state 1, it is plausible to assume that r51 > r52, i.e., continuous green arrow vs. dotted green arrow in Fig. 5a. In the AS excitation of the ground state manifold, a photon is absorbed first, thus we arrive at state 1’ from state 1 and at state 2’ from state 2. If the intensity of the pumping laser is not sufficiently high, then ISC from states 1’ and 2’ to state 5’ may conquer with the optical excitation from states 1’ and 2’ to states 3’ and 4’, respectively, where $${r}_{51{\prime} } > {r}_{52{\prime} }$$ because of the assumption of r51 > r52 and the spin–orbit coupling—responsible for ISC between the doublet and the quartet—is not affected directly by phonons (see Supplementary Note 1 for details). As a consequence, the occupation of state 3’ is effectively depleted with respect to that of state 4’, and thus I±1/2 effectively decreases over I±3/2 with respect to the case of Stokes excitation. This effect may increase the CW ODMR contrast of AS excitation compared to that of Stokes excitation.

## Discussion

In conclusion, we realized the coherent control of VSi defect spin ensembles in 4H-SiC under AS excitation at room temperature. Through investigation of the AS PL dependence on laser power and temperature, we demonstrate that the AS PL is induced by the phonon-assisted single low-energy photon absorption process. Moreover, the results show that the AS PL can be used for all-optical high-temperature temperature sensing. Based on stable AS PL, a comparison of Stokes and AS excited ODMR signals as a function of laser power, MW power, and temperature was demonstrated, which both show similar behaviors. In addition, the AS excited ODMR contrast is several times larger than the Stokes excitation contrast, while the AS excited ODMR linewidth is smaller than the Stokes excitation one. The former might be explained by a resonant spin-flipping optical transition between the doublet metastable and excited state quartet, which implies the position of the doublet metastable level with respect to the ground state quartet at around 0.15 eV, in accordance with a recent ab initio study43. Furthermore, the AS excited ODMR signals are also more robust than Stokes excitation one at high temperatures, making it more suitable for quantum technologies at elevated temperatures. The measurement of Stokes and AS excited ODMR spectra at various magnetic fields shows that they have the same resonant frequency. On this basis, we realized the coherent control of defect spin under AS excitation at room temperature. The results demonstrate that the AS excitation methods not only preserve spin properties but also can improve the signal contrast around three times. Moreover, the AS excitation methods can also directly be used for other solid state qubits, including NV centers in diamond20 and divacancies8 and NV centers25,26 in SiC, etc. The experiments form a framework for developing AS excitation technologies in quantum information processing and quantum sensing.

## Methods

### Sample preparation

In the experiment, we use a high-purity 4H-SiC epitaxy sample. Due to the low AS exciting efficiency, high-density VSi defect ensembles are required to obtain detectable signals. In view of this, we implanted 20 keV helium ions (dose 1 × 1013/cm2) and subsequently annealed the sample at 500 °C for 2 h.

### Experimental set-up

In the experiment, a home-made confocal system combined with a MW system is applied to excite and manipulate VSi defects. Two lasers with wavelengths of 720 and 1030 nm, which are modulated by two separate acousto-optic modulators, are used to excite and polarize VSi defects, respectively. In order to efficiently collect VSi defect fluorescence, a non-polarizing beam splitter with 30/70 beam splitting ratio (Thorlabs, BS080) is used to separate the excitation and collection paths. For the room temperature ODMR and coherent spin control experiments, a 1.3 N.A. oil objective is used to efficiently collect the fluorescence. For the AS excited PL at low and high temperatures, a 0.65 N.A. air objective is used. In order to collect the VSi defect fluorescence under both Stokes and AS excitation, we simultaneously used an 850-nm long-pass filter and a 1000-nm short-pass filter. The low-temperature experiment is performed using a Montana cryostation (4–350 K) combined with a confocal system. For the high-temperature experiments, the sample temperature is controlled and readout by a metal-ceramic heater (HT24S, Thorlabs) and a resistive temperature detector (TH100PT, Thorlabs), respectively. In the ODMR experiments, the fluorescence is collected by a multimode fiber into a femtowatt photoreceiver (OE-200-Si). For the readout of the ODMR signal, standard lock-in methods are used in the experiment, which is the same to the previous experiments8,17,25,27. The ODMR contrast is defined as ΔPL/PL = VMod/VTot, where VMod is the magnitude of the 70 Hz modulated component of the output voltage and VTot is the total time-averaged output voltage, which is the same with previous lock-in methods8.

## Data availability

The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

## References

1. 1.

Hensen, B. et al. Loophole-free bell inequality violation using electron spins separated by 1.3 kilometres. Nature 526, 682–686 (2015).

2. 2.

Kalb, N. et al. Entanglement distillation between solid-state quantum network nodes. Science 356, 928–932 (2017).

3. 3.

Humphreys, P. C. et al. Deterministic delivery of remote entanglement on a quantum network. Nature 558, 268–273 (2018).

4. 4.

Morioka, N. et al. Spin-controlled generation of indistinguishable and distinguishable photons from silicon vacancy centres in silicon carbide. Nat. Commun. 11, 2516 (2020).

5. 5.

Anderson, C. P. et al. Electrical and optical control of single spins integrated in scalable semiconductor devices. Science 366, 1225–1230 (2019).

6. 6.

Waldherr, G. et al. Quantum error correction in a solid-state hybrid spin register. Nature 506, 204–207 (2014).

7. 7.

Bradley, C. E. et al. A ten-qubit solid-state spin register with quantum memory up to one minute. Phys. Rev. X 9, 031045 (2019).

8. 8.

Koehl, W. F. et al. Room temperature coherent control of defect spin qubits in silicon carbide. Nature 479, 84–87 (2011).

9. 9.

Christle, D. J. et al. Isolated electron spins in silicon carbide with millisecond coherence times. Nat. Mater. 14, 160–163 (2015).

10. 10.

Widmann, M. et al. Coherent control of single spins in silicon carbide at room temperature. Nat. Mater. 14, 164–168 (2015).

11. 11.

Balasubramanian, G. et al. Nanoscale imaging magnetometry with diamond spins under ambient conditions. Nature 455, 648–651 (2008).

12. 12.

Dolde, F. et al. Electric-field sensing using single diamond spins. Nat. Phys. 7, 459–463 (2011).

13. 13.

Kucsko, G. et al. Nanometre-scale thermometry in a living cell. Nature 500, 54–58 (2013).

14. 14.

Shi, F. Z. et al. Single-protein spin resonance spectroscopy under ambient conditions. Science 347, 1135–1138 (2015).

15. 15.

Simin, D. et al. All-optical dc nanotesla magnetometry using silicon vacancy fine structure in isotopically purified silicon carbide. Phys. Rev. X 6, 031014 (2016).

16. 16.

Wolfowicz, G., Whiteley, S. J. & Awschalom, D. D. Electrometry by optical charge conversion of deep defects in 4H-SiC. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 115, 7879 (2018).

17. 17.

Zhou, Y. et al. Self-protected thermometry with infrared photons and defect spins in silicon carbide. Phys. Rev. Appl. 8, 044015 (2017).

18. 18.

Bourgeois, E. et al. Photoelectric detection of electron spin resonance of nitrogen-vacancy centres in diamond. Nat. Commun. 6, 8577 (2015).

19. 19.

Niethammer, M. et al. Coherent electrical readout of defect spins in silicon carbide by photo-ionization at ambient conditions. Nat. Commun. 10, 5569 (2019).

20. 20.

Tran, T. T. et al. Anti-Stokes excitation of solid-state quantum emitters for nanoscale thermometry. Sci. Adv. 5, eaav9180 (2019).

21. 21.

Wang, Q. X. et al. Photoluminescence upconversion by defects in hexagonal boron nitride. Nano Lett. 18, 6898–6905 (2018).

22. 22.

Wang, J. F. et al. Bright room temperature single photon source at telecom range in cubic silicon carbide. Nat. Commun. 9, 4106 (2018).

23. 23.

Lohrmann, A., Johnson, B. C., McCallum, J. C. & Castelletto, S. A review on single photon sources in silicon carbide. Rep. Prog. Phys. 80, 034502 (2017).

24. 24.

Zargaleh, S. A. et al. Nitrogen vacancy center in cubic silicon carbide: a promising qubit in the 1.5 μm spectral range for photonic quantum networks. Phys. Rev. B 98, 165203 (2018).

25. 25.

Wang, J. F. et al. Coherent control of nitrogen-vacancy center spins in silicon carbide at room temperature. Phys. Rev. Lett. 124, 223601 (2020).

26. 26.

Mu, Z. et al. Coherent manipulation with resonant excitation and single emitter creation of nitrogen vacancy centers in 4H silicon carbide. Nano Lett. 20, 6142–6147 (2020).

27. 27.

Wang, J. F. et al. On-demand generation of single silicon vacancy defects in silicon carbide. ACS Photon. 6, 1736–1743 (2019).

28. 28.

Gao, Y. F. et al. Phonon-assisted photoluminescence up-conversion of silicon-vacancy centers in diamond. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 9, 6656–6661 (2018).

29. 29.

Carter, S. G. et al. Spin coherence and echo modulation of the silicon vacancy in 4H-SiC at room temperature. Phys. Rev. B 92, 161202(R) (2015).

30. 30.

Soykal, Ö. O., Dev, P. & Economou, S. E. Silicon vacancy center in 4H-SiC: electronic structure and spin-photon interfaces. Phys. Rev. B 93, 081207(R) (2016).

31. 31.

Dong, W. Z., Doherty, M. W. & Economou, S. E. Spin polarization through intersystem crossing in the silicon vacancy of silicon carbide. Phys. Rev. B 99, 184102 (2019).

32. 32.

Castelletto, S. et al. Fluorescent color centers in laser ablated 4H-SiC nanoparticles. Opt. Lett. 42, 1297–1300 (2017).

33. 33.

Barry, JohnF. et al. Sensitivity optimization for NV-diamond magnetometry. Rev. Mod. Phys. 92, 015004 (2020).

34. 34.

Abraham, J. B. S. et al. nanoTesla magnetometry with the silicon vacancy in silicon carbide. Preprint at https://arxiv.org/abs/2011.01137 (2020).

35. 35.

Nagy, R. et al. Quantum properties of dichroic silicon vacancies in silicon carbide. Phys. Rev. Appl. 9, 034022 (2018).

36. 36.

Yan, F. F. et al. Coherent control of defect spins in silicon carbide above 550 K. Phys. Rev. Appl. 10, 044042 (2018).

37. 37.

Acosta, V. M. et al. Temperature dependence of the nitrogen-vacancy magnetic resonance in diamond. Phys. Rev. Lett. 104, 070801 (2010).

38. 38.

Toyli, D. M. et al. Measurement and control of single nitrogen-vacancy center spins above 600 K. Phys. Rev. X 2, 031001 (2012).

39. 39.

Anisimov, A. N. et al. Optical thermometry based on level anticrossing in silicon carbide. Sci. Rep. 6, 33301 (2016).

40. 40.

Shang, Z. et al. Local vibrational modes of Si vacancy spin qubits in SiC. Phys. Rev. B 101, 144109 (2020).

41. 41.

Kraus, H. et al. Magnetic field and temperature sensing with atomic-scale spin defects in silicon carbide. Sci. Rep. 4, 5303 (2014).

42. 42.

Liu, G. Q. et al. Coherent quantum control of nitrogen-vacancy center spins near 1000 kelvin. Nat. Commun. 10, 1344 (2019).

43. 43.

Widmann, M. et al. Electrical charge state manipulation of single silicon vacancies in a silicon carbide quantum optoelectronic device. Nano Lett. 19, 7173–7180 (2019).

44. 44.

Nagy, R. et al. High-fidelity spin and optical control of single silicon-vacancy centres in silicon carbide. Nat. Commun. 10, 1954 (2019).

45. 45.

Udvarhelyi, P. et al. Vibronic states and their effect on the temperature and strain dependence of silicon-vacancy qubits in 4H-SiC. Phys. Rev. Appl. 13, 054017 (2020).

## Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the National Key Research and Development Program of China (Grant Nos. 2016YFA0302700 and 2017YFA0304100), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos. U19A2075, 61725504, 61905233, 11975221, 11804330, 11821404, and 11774335), the Key Research Program of Frontier Sciences, Chinese Academy of Sciences (CAS) (Grant No. QYZDY-SSW-SLH003), Science Foundation of the CAS (No. ZDRW-XH-2019-1), Anhui Initiative in Quantum Information Technologies (AHY060300 and AHY020100), the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (Grant Nos. WK2030380017 and WK2470000026). A.G. acknowledges the support from the National Office of Research, Development and Innovation in Hungary for Quantum Technology Program (Grant No. 2017-1.2.1-NKP-2017-00001), the National Excellence Program (Grant No. KKP129866), and the project Nanospin (EU QuantERA Grant No. 127902) as well as from the Ministry of Innovation and Technology for the Quantum Information National Laboratory. This work was partially carried out at the USTC center for Micro and Nanoscale Research and Fabrication.

## Author information

Authors

### Contributions

J.-F.W. and J.-S.X. designed the experiments. J.-F.W. built the experiment set-up and performed the measurements with the help of F.-F.Y., Q.L., Z.-H.L., J.-M.C., and Z.-D.L. A.G. performed the theory modeling. J.-F.W., J.-S.X., and A.G. performed the data analysis and wrote the manuscript with contributions from all co-authors. J.-S.X., C.-F.L., and G.-C.G. supervised the project. All authors contributed to the discussion of the results.

### Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Adam Gali or Jin-Shi Xu or Chuan-Feng Li.

## Ethics declarations

### Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Peer review information Nature Communications thanks the anonymous reviewers for their contribution to the peer review of this work.

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

## Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

Wang, JF., Yan, FF., Li, Q. et al. Robust coherent control of solid-state spin qubits using anti-Stokes excitation. Nat Commun 12, 3223 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-021-23471-8

• Accepted:

• Published: