Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Deterministic transfer of optical-quality carbon nanotubes for atomically defined technology


When continued device scaling reaches the ultimate limit imposed by atoms, technology based on atomically precise structures is expected to emerge. Device fabrication will then require building blocks with identified atomic arrangements and assembly of the components without contamination. Here we report on a versatile dry transfer technique for deterministic placement of optical-quality carbon nanotubes. Single-crystalline anthracene is used as a medium which readily sublimes by mild heating, leaving behind clean nanotubes and thus enabling bright photoluminescence. We are able to position nanotubes of a desired chirality with a sub-micron accuracy under in-situ optical monitoring, thereby demonstrating deterministic coupling of a nanotube to a photonic crystal nanobeam cavity. A cross junction structure is also designed and constructed by repeating the nanotube transfer, where intertube exciton transfer is observed. Our results represent an important step towards development of devices consisting of atomically precise components and interfaces.


“There’s plenty of room at the bottom,” Richard Feynman said in his 1959 lecture1. Since the first notion of nanotechnology, device miniaturization has been the driving force for technological evolution. The rapid progress of nanofabrication techniques has pushed forward Moore’s Law, exponentially increasing the computation powers of semiconductor microprocessors that now form the foundations for large-scale simulations and artificial intelligence. Fueled by scientific curiosity and technological thirst, efforts for further scaling will undoubtedly continue until we reach the ultimate limit where devices are constructed of components and interfaces with atomic precision: Atomically defined technology.

Recent developments in heterostructures of two-dimensional (2D) materials2,3,4 have highlighted novel exotic phenomena arising from the intricacies of precise atomic arrangements. Twisted bilayer graphene exhibits superconductivity at the magic angle5, whereas twisted homobilayer of 2D semiconductor with a long-period moiré superlattice gives rise to incompressible Mott-like states of electrons6. In addition, high-temperature condensation of interlayer excitons has been observed in aligned MoSe2–WSe2 atomic double layers7, where control over the interlayer spacing by atomically thin insulators also plays a key role.

To harness the full functionality and performance of atomically precise structures, systems with more complexity than stacked layers would be necessary. It is, however, not an easy task to assemble atomically defined building blocks for real-world applications. Organic molecules allow for tailoring their structures at the atomic level8,9, but manipulation of single molecules requires low temperature and ultrahigh vacuum10. Although it is possible to integrate individual semiconductor nanostructures into electronic and photonic devices11,12, it still remains a challenge to reproducibly prepare identical structures with atomic precision.

Carbon nanotubes (CNTs) offer a unique position in this context. Their atomic arrangements can be specified by chirality which is a combination of two integers defining the geometry of the roll-up vector, and they can be individually addressed to construct various nanoscale devices such as single-electron transistors 13 and light-emitting diodes14. Simultaneous control over chirality, position, and orientation of CNTs would enable the fabrication of devices utilizing atomically precise components, given that their intrinsic properties are preserved during assembly. Picking up air-suspended tubes and re-suspending them is an ideal method for keeping the surface pristine15,16,17,18, but the necessity for three-dimensional structures imposes limitations on device construction. In addition, state-of-the-art growth control over tube diameter and length on substrate surfaces19,20,21 cannot be utilized. A different approach for manipulating chirality-identified tubes with negligible contamination would be required to achieve the flexibility needed for integrating multiple elements on demand.

Here we demonstrate the deterministic transfer of optical-quality CNTs by utilizing anthracene as a sacrificial material. The use of large anthracene crystals allows transfer onto arbitrary substrates, and removal of anthracene through sublimation recovers the CNT luminescence intensity to the level of as-grown tubes. By monitoring the PL of CNTs during the transfer, we can select nanotubes of the desired chirality and position them with sub-micron spatial accuracy. As a demonstration of the chirality-on-demand transfer technique, we perform deterministic coupling to a photonic crystal nanobeam cavity. Furthermore, we design and assemble a cross junction from semiconducting CNTs to observe intertube exciton transport.

Results and discussion

Anthracene-assisted nanotube transfer

Figure 1 illustrates the steps of the anthracene-assisted transfer of individual CNTs. To pick up long CNTs and release them on arbitrary substrates with minimum contamination, we use thin and large-area organic crystals that do not require wet processes or high-temperature treatments. Anthracene, which consists of three benzene rings, meets such requirements22,23. We expect the similarity of molecular structure between anthracene and CNTs to lead to strong ππ interactions24, possibly improving the efficiency of picking up CNTs from the growth substrates. The charge-neutral nature of anthracene25 should suppress exciton quenching, and we anticipate PL of CNTs to remain bright.

Fig. 1: Procedure for anthracene-assisted dry transfer of carbon nanotubes.

a Schematic of the transfer system that simultaneously monitors the nanotube PL, the laser reflectivity, and the wide-field image. Substrates and a stamp are mounted on independent 3-axis stages. b Anthracene crystals are grown on glass slides through in-air sublimation and are picked up with a PDMS stamp. c CNTs are picked up with the PDMS/anthracene stamp, d followed by a PL measurement to locate CNTs of interest. e Anthracene/CNTs are released on a receiving substrate by peeling off the stamp. f In-air heating of the substrate removes the anthracene crystals and g leaves behind the CNTs alone. hk Typical optical images of anthracene crystals grown on a glass slide (h), picked up on a PDMS (i), transferred to a Si chip with an array of pits (j), and after sublimation in air (k). Region outlined by a blue dashed box in h is coated with marker ink. Scale bars are 100 μm.

As shown in Fig. 1a, we have built a transfer system where the nanotube PL, the laser reflection, and the wide-field optical image are monitored during the nanotube transfer process. An anthracene single crystal is picked up with a glass-supported polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS) sheet (Gelfilm by Gelpak®)26 (Fig. 1b). Viscoelastic nature of PDMS is utilized to tune the adhesion to anthracene crystals, broadening the choices of materials and shapes for nanotube growth substrates and receiving substrates. CNTs are picked up by pressing the anthracene/PDMS stamp against a substrate with as-grown CNTs (Fig. 1c), followed by quick separation (>10 mm/s) so that the anthracene crystal remains attached to the PDMS sheet27. PL mapping of CNTs on the anthracene crystal is performed when a CNT of a specific chirality needs to be selected (Fig. 1d). The stamp is then pressed on a receiving substrate. By slowly peeling off the PDMS (<0.2 μm/s), the anthracene crystal with the CNTs are released on the substrate (Fig. 1e). Sublimation of anthracene in air leaves behind clean CNTs on any substrate (Fig. 1f, g) because contamination from solvents is absent in the all-dry process. Figure 1h–k shows the optical microscopy images of anthracene crystals during the transfer steps, corresponding to the schematics in Fig. 1b, c, e, g, respectively. Being a single crystal, the anthracene stamp can be easily handled and transferred without significant damage even over trenches and pits, and can be sublimed after a typical heating process at 110 C for 10 min.

Clean and efficient transfer of CNTs from quartz

We first apply the anthracene-assisted method for CNTs grown on a quartz substrate19, where the CNTs grow parallel to each other with lengths exceeding 100 μm. We transfer the CNTs from the quartz substrate to trenches etched on a SiO2/Si substrate. Figure 2a shows typical PL spectra from a transferred CNT with a total length of ~50 μm, which are measured at an air-suspended region over a 5-μm-wide trench (red) and at an on-substrate region (green). The PL efficiency of the suspended region is higher by ~250-fold than the on-substrate region of the same CNT. The absence of SiO2 underneath also narrows and blueshifts the emission spectra by fourfold and 55 meV, respectively. In Fig. 2b, a scanning electron microscopy (SEM) image displays uniformity along the entire length of the air-suspended CNT. In a PL image plotting the integrated PL intensity IPL over a ~50 nm spectral window centered at the emission wavelength λem (Fig. 2c), we also observe the uniform optical response. The intratube variation of the E11 peak positions (standard deviation of 2.3 nm) is smaller than the intertube variation in as-grown CNTs with the same chirality (standard deviation of 3.8 nm) reported in a previous study28. We assign the tube chirality to be (9, 8) from the PL excitation (PLE) map (Fig. 2d).

Fig. 2: Bright PL of a transferred CNT.

a PL spectra of the CNT transferred from a quartz substrate. Red and green spectra are measured from the same CNT at an air-suspended region and at a region in contact with the SiO2 surface, respectively. Numbers in parentheses represent the full width at half maximum. b SEM image of the suspended region and c the corresponding PL image at emision wavelength λem of 1379 nm. Excitation power P = 5 μW. The peak shift Δλem (red) from as-grown tubes28 and integrated PL intensity IPL (black) along the tube axis are shown in the right panel. d PLE spectrum from which chirality is determined to be (9,8). Inset: polarization angle dependence of IPL. e, f AFM image of the aligned CNTs measured on the SiO2 surface after sublimation of an anthracene crystal. In f, the left and right sides are in contact with PDMS and anthracene, respectively. g Optical image of the anthracene crystal with CNTs from quartz. h Raman mapping showing G-band intensity in the region outlined by a red box in g. Scale bars in bc and eh are 1, 1, 0.5, 2, 50, and 10 μm, respectively.

Insignificant residue on CNTs and the substrate surface is confirmed in atomic force microscopy (AFM) image of CNTs, and preservation of CNT alignment after the transfer is observed (Fig. 2e). The measured heights of the CNTs fall within the typical diameter range of those on the growth substrates29. It is noteworthy that the anthracene stamp gives rise to only one tenth as much contamination as a PDMS stamp (Fig. 2f), suggesting an advantage also for transferring 2D materials.

The use of anthracene as a medium drastically improves the overall transfer yield compared with the transfer using PDMS alone. Figure 2g shows an optical image of the anthracene crystal with CNTs underneath. G-band Raman mapping in Fig. 2h clearly indicates that CNTs are transferred only through anthracene mediation. The improved transfer yield of the anthracene-assisted method may partially originate from the fact that 100% of the picked-up CNTs are released on the receiving substrates together with the anthracene crystals. We should note that the pick-up efficiency by the anthracene crystals is much higher for small diameter CNTs (~1 nm), but the diameter range of CNTs on quartz under the current growth condition (1.42 ± 0.17 nm29) lies outside of the optimal range (Supplementary Fig. 3). Combined with the strong tube-substrate interaction that spontaneously aligns CNTs during the growth, the fraction of CNTs actually picked up is <1%. Optimization of the growth conditions should improve the pickup efficiency and further improve the transfer yield.

High optical quality of the transferred CNTs

The CNTs transferred over trenches should fluoresce as brightly as unprocessed ones in the absence of contamination. To evaluate the PL properties of the CNT shown in Fig. 2a, we perform PL measurements on typical substrates used for growth and photonic applications of CNTs; specifically, we use as-grown CNTs on quartz substrates19 or over trenches, and transferred CNTs on poly(methyl methacrylate) (PMMA)30 or polystyrene31 (see the Methods section). We measure >10,000 spectra on each sample to perform statistical characterization.

Figure 3a shows representative PL spectra of the brightest CNTs within each sample. As-grown CNTs on quartz show a broad peak with very small IPL due to the strong interaction with the substrate. The PL properties on the polymers are superior to those on quartz and SiO2 (Supplementary Fig. 6) even in comparison with the previous study32 likely due in part to the absence of wet processes and high-temperature treatments (see Supplementary Fig. 8). Not surprisingly, the as-grown suspended CNTs fluoresce most brightly and sharply out of all substrates studied.

Fig. 3: PL properties of CNTs on various surfaces.

a Typical PL spectra with top ~0.1% of integrated PL intensity IPL for each sample at excitation power P = 5 μW. Black solid lines are Lorentzian fits. Numbers in parentheses represent the full width at half maximum. Inset: PL enhancement factor in comparison with CNTs on quartz, at IPL with a relative frequency of 10−3. Error bars are the IPL ranges that appear twice or half as frequently. Red vertical line represents the transferred air-suspended CNT in Fig. 2. The sample names with asterisks represent as-grown CNTs; otherwise, the CNTs are transferred via anthracene. b Typical PLE spectrum and c PL image at emission wavelength λem of 1253 nm of a (10,5) CNT picked up on anthracene crystals. Inset: Polarization dependence of IPL. Scale bar is 1 μm. d PLE peak positions of CNTs on anthracene (red dots), which are redshifted compared with as-grown suspended CNTs (black squares)28. P = 100 μW is used in bd.

The influence of each substrate observed in the representative spectra is further confirmed by statistical analysis. The majority of the measured spectra show only noise, implying each peak originates from at most one nanotube (see Supplementary Fig. 6). We therefore consider IPL above the noise floor to be representing the brightness of individual CNTs, whose histogram follows a log-normal distribution in all the samples reflecting the stochastic formation of exciton quenching sites (see Supplementary Fig. 7). When IPL at a relative frequency of 10−3 is used for comparison, the PL enhancement factor of the CNTs on the polymers with respect to those on quartz ranges between two to three orders of magnitude (the inset in Fig. 3a). Air-suspended CNTs have IPL greater by >4000-fold than unprocessed tubes on quartz. Importantly, the CNT shown in Fig. 2, whose IPL is indicated by the red vertical line in the inset of Fig. 3a, even outperforms the best as-grown suspended CNTs. It is somewhat surprising that PL recovery (~5000 fold) through the transfer from quartz surface to the trench results in intensity matching as-grown tubes. We note that statistical evaluation for such transferred CNTs requires further improvement of nanotube pick-up efficiency through diameter optimization.

We also find that the bright PL is accompanied by narrow spectral linewidths with small statistical variance (see Supplementary Fig. 6). The air-suspended CNTs show the sharpest peaks, while CNTs on polymers have linewidths equivalent to those in aqueous agarose gels33. A slightly broadened linewidth is observed for the air-suspended CNT transferred from quartz in Fig. 2 compared with typical as-grown ones, which may indicate the presence of anthracene residue after the sublimation. The high PL intensity of the transferred CNT comparable to as-grown CNTs suggests that anthracene residue has a negligible effect on PL intensity.

If PL intensity also remains high for nanotubes on anthracene, chirality assignment can be done after picking up the CNTs. As the PL of CNTs on the growth substrate surface is barely detectable, the capability for assigning the tube chirality would be an important factor towards deterministic transfer. We perform PL measurements for the CNTs supported by anthracene crystals over the pits (Fig. 1j). Figure 3b shows a typical PLE map of a CNT on anthracene, peaking as sharply as the air-suspended ones at the E11 and E22 resonances. The tube orientation is revealed by both the PL image (Fig. 3c) and the polarization dependence of IPL (the inset). As shown in Fig. 3d, chiralities of such CNTs can be assigned from PLE spectra prior to releasing onto receiving substrates.

Deterministic transfer under PL monitoring

The 100% release of CNTs from the stamp to the target substrate combined with the bright PL on anthracene facilitates the deterministic transfer of CNTs where chirality and position are controlled simultaneously. Position-controlled transfer approaches have been limited for CNTs15,18 because individual CNTs are barely visible by conventional optical means. Electron microscopy can visualize CNTs, but it requires elaborate vacuum systems and induces exciton quenching sites34. Since PL spectroscopy can reveal the location, angle, and chirality of single CNTs, we have incorporated the CNT transfer system into the micro-PL setup. Hyperspectral 2D images and PLE maps are obtained to locate a CNT with a desired chirality among CNTs on anthracene crystal surface. As shown in Fig. 4a, we align the selected CNT and the destination on the receiving substrate to the optical axis of the laser beam. The anthracene crystal with the CNT is pressed and then released at the designated position.

Fig. 4: Demonstration of deterministic transfer of CNTs.

a Schematic showing the alignment of a selected CNT and a receiving substrate. Wide-field images and laser scanning images are simultaneously obtained for the stamp and the substrate. b Optical images of the receiving substrate, which is covered by a polystyrene film to suppress exciton quenching (see Fig. 3). Top panel shows a 35 × 65 μm2 micrograph, in which the numbers (11,6) are lithographically patterned metal, and represent the chiral index of a CNT to be transferred. Confocal PL image of the transferred (11,6) nanotube (bottom), where integrated PL intensity IPL at 1418 nm and the laser reflectivity are superimposed. c PLE map of the transferred CNT. Inset: Polarization dependence of IPL. Data in b and c are taken with excitation power P = 5 μW. d Optical micrograph of a nanobeam cavity covered with a ~30-nm-thick h-BN flake. Typical SEM image of an as-fabricated nanobeam cavity (middle) and simulated spatial distribution of the y-component of the electric field for the fundamental mode at the top surface (bottom). e Schematics showing the steps for measurements and deterministic transfer of a CNT/h-BN heterostructure onto a nanobeam cavity. f PL spectra of the fundamental mode of cavities with (red) and without (black) the h-BN nano-spacer, and PL spectrum of a (13,5) nanotube picked up on an anthracene crystal (bottom). For the test nanobeam (top), the resonant wavelength is redshifted by 27.6 nm due to the covering dielectric layer. Based on the shift value, a target nanobeam (middle) is chosen so that wavelengths of the shifted fundamental mode and the (13,5) tube emission36 coincide at the red dashed (dotted) line indicating the expected peak position under (on) the h-BN. g PL spectrum of the cavity-coupled CNT. Black dots are data and solid lines are the Lorentzian multi-peak fits. P = 8 μW and laser polarization is perpendicular to the nanobeam. Inset: PL image of the (13,5) tube emission. White dashed cross indicates the center of the cavity. All the scale bars are 2 μm.

We demonstrate such a deterministic approach by transferring the CNTs, whose chiral indices are pre-specified on a receiving substrate as shown in the upper part of Fig. 4b. A nanotube with chirality of (11,6) is found on the anthracene crystal and then transferred to the center of the cross mark. PL signals at λem = 1418 nm and the laser reflectivity are superimposed (Fig. 4b, bottom), displaying the desired CNT at the designated location with only ~500 nm misalignment. The PLE map confirms the tube chirality to be (11,6) (Fig. 4c), thereby demonstrating that our transfer method provides a sub-micron position accuracy and chirality selectivity for individual bright CNTs. We have subsequently transferred a (9,7) nanotube at the same location and the result is summarized in Supplementary Fig. 11, further supporting the reliability of our method.

The benefits of the position and chirality control over transferred CNTs are more evident in achieving deterministic coupling of a CNT to a photonic crystal microcavity, in which amplified electric fields are localized within a few μm35. We demonstrate the capability of our transfer method by precisely placing a CNT whose emission wavelength matches the fundamental mode of a nanobeam cavity. As shown in Fig. 4d, a hexagonal boron nitride (h-BN) flake covers an as-fabricated nanobeam cavity and serves as a nano-spacer to simultaneously prevent exciton quenching and the decay of electric fields.

We perform deterministic transfer of a CNT and h-BN by taking into account the spectral shifts of the CNT and the cavity modes in contact with h-BN. The fabrication steps are summarized in Fig. 4e. The fundamental mode of a test nanobeam cavity is redshifted by 27.6 nm after the transfer of an h-BN flake (Fig. 4f, top). Based on the shift amount, we seek a target nanobeam whose cavity mode under this particular h-BN flake would match the (13,5) tube emission on h-BN36 (Fig. 4f, middle). After characterizing a (13,5) CNT on an anthracene crystal, we further pick up the h-BN flake and place this anthracene/CNT/h-BN heterostructure onto the target nanobeam, followed by anthracene sublimation. A PL spectrum of the CNT in Fig. 4g has a cavity-coupled narrow line, exhibiting a nearly perfect spectral and spatial matching. We note that the high compatibility of anthracene crystals with 2D materials plays a key role in this demonstration (see Supplementary Fig. 9 for the case of suspended monolayer WSe2).

Exciton transfer at a cross junction

Our transfer technique also offers opportunities to study basic elements needed to build advanced structures consisting of multiple CNTs. Cross junction formation is an example, which allows us to extract intertube exciton dynamics at controlled interfaces. A PL image and a PLE map of an isolated (10,5) tube that is transferred first are shown in Supplementary Fig. 12. Next, we find a (13,5) tube among the CNTs picked up from the quartz substrate, whose angle is adjusted perpendicular to the pre-transferred (10,5) tube. The (13,5) tube and the anthracene crystal are then released over the (10,5) nanotube on the chip.

We perform PL imaging with two different excitation conditions. Figure 5a shows IPL from the (13,5) tube when the excitation energy and polarization are resonant and parallel, respectively, showing a straight geometry of the transferred CNT. When the laser wavelength and polarization are chosen to maximize the IPL of the (10,5) tube, the PL image for the (10,5) tube emission does not show any remarkable change before and after the transfer of the additional tube (Supplementary Fig. 12a and Fig. 5b). Interestingly, the PL image filtered around the (13,5) tube emission peak (Fig. 5c) shows a small bump that spatially overlaps with the (10,5) tube. This implies that higher energy excitons generated in the thinner (10,5) tube diffuse towards the cross junction before transferring into the other nanotube.

Fig. 5: Crossed CNTs formed through multiple transfer processes.

a Confocal PL image of a transferred (13,5) CNT, which has an emission peak at 1514 nm, with the excitation at its E22 resonance (944 nm) and the laser polarization parallel to the tube axis. b PL image of a (10,5) tube at emission wavelength λem of 1263 nm, taken with excitation near its E22 resonance (790 nm) and the polarization parallel to its axis. c PL image at λem = 1514 nm, which is simultaneously obtained with b. Scale bars are 1  μm. d, e PLE maps measured at the yellow star and the blue diamonds in ac. f Schematic of energy diagram for the (10,5)–(13,5) CNT heterostructure, showing emission at 1263 and 1514 nm with excitation wavelength λex = 790 nm. P = 100 μW for all the panels. The substrate is covered with a PMMA film before the CNT transfer, and measurements are performed without removing the anthracene crystal used for transferring the (13,5) tube.

We also observe spectral signatures of intertube exciton transfer in PLE spectra. The PLE map in Fig. 5d is measured at the yellow star in Fig. 5a, showing the E22 absorption peak of the (13,5) tube without other prominent absorption peaks. In contrast, when tubes are excited at the light blue diamond in Fig. 5b, c, the PLE spectrum for the (13,5) tube emission shows a sub-peak at the E22 absorption peak of the (10,5) tube (Fig. 5e). This absorption peak for the (13,5) tube emission indicates that a small portion of excitons generated in the (10,5) tube is transferred and contributes to the emission around 1500 nm (Fig. 5f). The excitonic energy mismatch between the CNTs, as well as the 0D-like ultrasmall contact, may lead to the low efficiency of exciton transfer of ~8% (see Supplementary Fig. 12) compared with a previous study37.

For more complex structures, the throughput of our deterministic transfer technique will need to be optimized. Room for technical improvement may lie in enhancing the tube-anthracene interaction (see Supplementary Fig. 3) and faster chirality assignment methods38 compatible with our transfer process. With higher pick-up efficiency for nanotubes of known chirality, multiple components can be assembled on a single anthracene crystal in a similar manner to the cases in the stacking of 2D materials39 before being transferred on a receiving substrate. The entire transfer process could then be even faster than polymer-based techniques, as temperature switching40 is not required between the pick-up and release steps.

In conclusion, we have developed a method for the deterministic transfer of chirality-on-demand CNTs with high optical quality, assisted by sacrificial anthracene single crystals. Transferred CNTs fluoresce as bright as unprocessed air-suspended CNTs, where crystal growth and removal by sublimation play a key role. With precise control over position, angle, and tube chirality, individual nanotubes are coupled in a deterministic manner to other nanoscale components such as a nanobeam cavity and another nanotube. Our results demonstrate the extensive capabilities of the deterministic transfer method in nanodevice fabrication from atomically defined building blocks. Novel materials and automated fabrication systems would allow for larger scale and higher complexity structures, eventually leading to technology that makes use of all the room at the bottom.


Micro-PL measurements

A homebuilt confocal microscopy system is used to perform PL measurements at room temperature in air. We use a wavelength-tunable Ti:sapphire laser for excitation with its power and polarization angle controlled by neutral density filters and a half-wave plate, respectively. The laser beam is focused on the samples using an objective lens with a correction collar, a numerical aperture of 0.65, and a working distance of 4.5 mm. The 1/e2 beam diameter and the collection spot size defined by a confocal pinhole are ~1.2 and 5.4 μm, respectively. PL is collected through the same objective lens and detected using a liquid-nitrogen-cooled InGaAs diode array attached to a spectrometer. To assist the transfer process while monitoring PL signals, wide-field 2D images of the substrate and the stamp are simultaneously obtained with a commercially available CMOS camera under coaxial illumination by an LED (see Supplementary Fig. 1).

CNT synthesis

We use three types of CNT synthesis in this study. The arrays of long CNTs are grown on single-crystalline quartz substrates29. Iron catalyst nanoparticles with a nominal thickness of 0.2 nm are deposited on lithographically patterned stripes. The CNT arrays are grown at 800 C for 10 min by low-pressure alcoholic chemical vapor deposition (CVD) technique. Air-suspended CNTs are grown across 1- to 2-μm-wide trenches that are formed on SiO2/Si substrates by dry etching. Iron catalyst (0.1-nm thick) is deposited near the trenches by electron-beam evaporation, followed by atmospheric pressure CVD (1 min) at 800 C with ethanol precursor supplied through bubbling of Ar/H2 carrier gas28. For randomly oriented CNTs that are transferred via anthracene, the CNTs are grown on flat SiO2/Si substrates without trench formation nor catalyst patterning, and the other growth conditions are the same as the air-suspended CNTs.

Anthracene crystal growth

Anthracene crystals are grown by in-air sublimation41. Anthracene powder is placed on a glass slide that is heated to 80 C, and another glass slide is placed above the anthracene source typically with a 1 mm spacing. Thin and large-area single crystals start growing on the glass surface but extend out of plane of the glass surface. To efficiently grow such thin and large-area crystals, glass slides are patterned with ink of commercially available markers, on which the nucleation of three-dimensional crystals is suppressed. The typical growth time is 10 h.

Transferred CNT samples for PL comparison

In Fig. 3a, transferred CNTs (shown without asterisk) are prepared using the anthracene-assisted method. Polymer (PMMA and polystyrene) thin films are formed by spin-coating on Si chips with alignment markers, followed by baking at 170 C. CNTs on anthracene are measured at suspended parts of anthracene/CNTs over square pits on SiO2/Si chips (see Fig. 1j). All the transferred samples measured in Fig. 3 and Supplementary Fig. 6 are grown from unpatterned catalysts on flat SiO2/Si substrates. For air-suspended CNTs, we scan the excitation laser beam along trenches with excitation wavelength λex = 780 nm, while 2D raster scan with excitation at λex = 790 nm is performed for the rest of the samples to adjust for the screening-induced energy shifts42. We acquire the PL signal of CNTs on quartz without a grating to increase the signal-to-noise ratio and calibrate the intensity by taking into account the grating efficiency to compare IPL with other samples.

Deterministic coupling with nanobeam cavities

Air-mode nanobeam cavities are fabricated using silicon-on-insulator wafers with a top Si thickness of 260 nm and a buried oxide thickness of 1 μm. The nanobeams are patterned by electron beam lithography, followed by inductively coupled plasma etching of the top Si layer. The buried oxide layer under the nanobeam structures is then etched by hydrofluoric acid. To align the wavelengths of a transferred CNT and a nanobeam cavity with h-BN in between, cavity modes of the nanobeams are measured using Si PL with λex = 780 nm and P = 200 μW.

Data availability

The data that support the plots within this paper and other findings of this study are available from the corresponding authors upon reasonable request.


  1. 1.

    Feynman, R. P. There’s plenty of room at the bottom. Eng. Sci. 23, 22 (1960).

    Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Novoselov, K. S. et al. Electric field effect in atomically thin carbon films. Science 306, 666 (2004).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Novoselov, K. S. et al. Two-dimensional atomic crystals. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 102, 10451 (2005).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Dean, C. R. et al. Boron nitride substrates for high-quality graphene electronics. Nat. Nanotechnol. 5, 722 (2010).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Cao, Y. et al. Unconventional superconductivity in magic-angle graphene superlattices. Nature 556, 43 (2018).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Shimazaki, Y. et al. Strongly correlated electrons and hybrid excitons in a moiré heterostructure. Nature 580, 472 (2020).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Wang, Z. et al. Evidence of high-temperature exciton condensation in two-dimensional atomic double layers. Nature 574, 76 (2019).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Park, H. et al. Nanomechanical oscillations in a single-C60 transistor. Nature 407, 57 (2000).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Perrin, M. L., Burzurí, E. & van der Zant, H. S. J. Single-molecule transistors. Chem. Soc. Rev. 44, 902 (2015).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Moresco, F. et al. Conformational changes of single molecules induced by scanning tunneling microscopy manipulation: a route to molecular switching. Phys. Rev. Lett. 86, 672 (2001).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Klein, D. L., Roth, R., Lim, A. K. L., Alivisatos, A. P. & McEuen, P. L. A single-electron transistor made from a cadmium selenide nanocrystal. Nature 389, 699 (1997).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Santori, C., Fattal, D., Vučković, J., Solomon, G. S. & Yamamoto, Y. Indistinguishable photons from a single-photon device. Nature 419, 594 (2002).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Postma, H. W. C., Teepen, T., Yao, Z., Grifoni, M. & Dekker, C. Carbon nanotube single-electron transistors at room temperature. Science 293, 76 (2001).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Mueller, T. et al. Efficient narrow-band light emission from a single carbon nanotube p-n diode. Nat. Nanotechnol. 5, 27 (2010).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Huang, X. M. H. et al. Controlled placement of individual carbon nanotubes. Nano Lett. 5, 1515 (2005).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Abrams, Z. R., Ioffe, Z., Tsukernik, A., Cheshnovsky, O. & Hanein, Y. A complete scheme for creating predefined networks of individual carbon nanotubes. Nano Lett. 7, 2666 (2007).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Wu, C. C., Liu, C. H. & Zhong, Z. One-step direct transfer of pristine single-walled carbon nanotubes for functional nanoelectronics. Nano Lett. 10, 1032 (2010).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Waissman, J. et al. Realization of pristine and locally tunable one-dimensional electron systems in carbon nanotubes. Nat. Nanotechnol. 8, 569 (2013).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Kocabas, C. et al. Guided growth of large-scale, horizontally aligned arrays of single-walled carbon nanotubes and their use in thin-film transistors. Small 1, 1110 (2005).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Yang, F. et al. Chirality-specific growth of single-walled carbon nanotubes on solid alloy catalysts. Nature 510, 522 (2014).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Zhang, S. et al. Arrays of horizontal carbon nanotubes of controlled chirality grown using designed catalysts. Nature 543, 234 (2017).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Yulaev, A. et al. Toward clean suspended CVD graphene. RSC Adv. 6, 83954 (2016).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Chen, M. et al. Sublimation-assisted graphene transfer technique based on small polyaromatic hydrocarbons. Nanotechnology 28, 255701 (2017).

    ADS  PubMed  Article  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Chen, R. J., Zhang, Y., Wang, D. & Dai, H. Noncovalent sidewall functionalization of single-walled carbon nanotubes for protein immobilization. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 123, 3838 (2001).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Lu, J. et al. Selective interaction of large or charge-transfer aromatic molecules with metallic single-wall carbon nanotubes: critical role of the molecular size and orientation. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 128, 5114 (2006).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Sundar, V. C. et al. Elastomeric transistor stamps: reversible probing of charge transport in organic crystals. Science 303, 1644 (2004).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Meitl, M. A. et al. Transfer printing by kinetic control of adhesion to an elastomeric stamp. Nat. Mater. 5, 33 (2005).

    ADS  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Ishii, A., Yoshida, M. & Kato, Y. K. Exciton diffusion, end quenching, and exciton-exciton annihilation in individual air-suspended carbon nanotubes. Phys. Rev. B 91, 125427 (2015).

    ADS  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Otsuka, K. et al. Digital isotope coding to trace the growth process of individual single-walled carbon nanotubes. ACS Nano 12, 3994 (2018).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Legrand, D. et al. Monolithic microcavity with carbon nanotubes as active material. Appl. Phys. Lett. 102, 153102 (2013).

    ADS  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    He, X. et al. Tunable room-temperature single-photon emission at telecom wavelengths from sp3 defects in carbon nanotubes. Nat. Photon. 11, 577 (2017).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Schweiger, M., Zakharko, Y., Gannott, F., Grimm, S. B. & Zaumseil, J. Photoluminescence enhancement of aligned arrays of single-walled carbon nanotubes by polymer transfer. Nanoscale 7, 16715 (2015).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Cambré, S. et al. Luminescence properties of individual empty and water-filled single-walled carbon nanotubes. ACS Nano 6, 2649 (2012).

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    Suzuki, S. & Kobayashi, Y. Healing of low-energy irradiation-induced defects in single-walled carbon nanotubes at room temperature. J. Phys. Chem. C 111, 4524 (2007).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    Miura, R. et al. Ultralow mode-volume photonic crystal nanobeam cavities for high-efficiency coupling to individual carbon nanotube emitters. Nat. Commun. 5, 5580 (2014).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    Fang, N. et al. Hexagonal boron nitride as an ideal substrate for carbon nanotube photonics. ACS Photonics 7, 1773 (2020).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  37. 37.

    Qian, H. et al. Exciton energy transfer in pairs of single-walled carbon nanotubes. Nano Lett. 8, 1363 (2008).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  38. 38.

    Liu, K. et al. High-throughput optical imaging and spectroscopy of individual carbon nanotubes in devices. Nat. Nanotechnol. 8, 917 (2013).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  39. 39.

    Masubuchi, S. et al. Autonomous robotic searching and assembly of two-dimensional crystals to build van der waals superlattices. Nat. Commun. 9, 1413 (2018).

  40. 40.

    Zomer, P. J., Dash, S. P., Tombros, N. & van Wees, B. J. A transfer technique for high mobility graphene devices on commercially available hexagonal boron nitride. Appl. Phys. Lett. 99, 232104 (2011).

    ADS  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. 41.

    Ye, X. et al. Microspacing in-air sublimation growth of organic crystals. Chem. Mater. 30, 412 (2018).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  42. 42.

    Ohno, Y. et al. Chirality-dependent environmental effects in photoluminescence of single-walled carbon nanotubes. Phys. Rev. B 73, 235427 (2006).

    ADS  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references


Parts of this study are supported by JSPS (KAKENHI JP20H02558, JP19J00894, JP20K15137), MIC (SCOPE 191503001), and MEXT (Nanotechnology Platform JPMXP09F19UT0075). The growth of h-BN crystals is supported by the Element Strategy Initiative conducted by the MEXT (JPMXP0112101001), JSPS (KAKENHI JP20H00354), and JST (CREST JPMJCR15F3). K.O. and D.Y. are supported by JSPS (Research Fellowship for Young Scientists). N.F. is supported by RIKEN Special Postdoctoral Researcher Program. We thank T. Inoue, S. Maruyama, and K. Nagashio for help in the preparation of CNTs and 2D materials, as well as the Advanced Manufacturing Support Team at RIKEN for technical assistance.

Author information




K.O. developed the nanotube transfer system, and performed all the nanotube-related experiments and data analysis. N.F. performed transfer and spectroscopy of 2D materials. D.Y. performed simulation, fabrication, and measurements of nanobeam cavities. T.T. and K.W. provided boron nitride crystals. Y.K.K. supervised the project. K.O. and Y.K.K. co-wrote the manuscript. All the authors commented on the manuscript.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Keigo Otsuka or Yuichiro K. Kato.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Peer review information Nature Communications thanks Elena Bekyarova and the other anonymous reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work. Peer reviewer reports are available.

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Otsuka, K., Fang, N., Yamashita, D. et al. Deterministic transfer of optical-quality carbon nanotubes for atomically defined technology. Nat Commun 12, 3138 (2021).

Download citation


By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.


Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing