Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Evidence from oyster suggests an ancient role for Pdx in regulating insulin gene expression in animals

Abstract

Hox and ParaHox genes encode transcription factors with similar expression patterns in divergent animals. The Pdx (Xlox) homeobox gene, for example, is expressed in a sharp spatial domain in the endodermal cell layer of the gut in chordates, echinoderms, annelids and molluscs. The significance of comparable gene expression patterns is unclear because it is not known if downstream transcriptional targets are also conserved. Here, we report evidence indicating that a classic transcriptional target of Pdx1 in vertebrates, the insulin gene, is a likely direct target of Pdx in Pacific oyster adults. We show that one insulin-related gene, cgILP, is co-expressed with cgPdx in oyster digestive tissue. Transcriptomic comparison suggests that this tissue plays a similar role to the vertebrate pancreas. Using ATAC-seq and ChIP, we identify an upstream regulatory element of the cgILP gene which shows binding interaction with cgPdx protein in oyster hepatopancreas and demonstrate, using a cell culture assay, that the oyster Pdx can act as a transcriptional activator through this site, possibly in synergy with NeuroD. These data argue that a classic homeodomain-target gene interaction dates back to the origin of Bilateria.

Introduction

The ParaHox genes comprise the Gsx, Pdx and Cdx homeobox gene families, each of which can be traced to the most recent common ancestor of the extant bilaterally symmetrical animals, the Bilateria1,2. Like their better known paralogues, the Hox genes, ParaHox genes were ancestrally arranged in a gene cluster and a tightly linked genomic arrangement is still retained in amphioxus (Branchiostoma floridae)1, sea star (Patiria miniata)3, acorn worm (Ptychodera flava)4, two molluscs5,6 and many vertebrates. Genome duplications in vertebrates generated additional ParaHox genes, including a second Pdx gene in coelacanth and sharks7. Also reminiscent of Hox genes, the central ParaHox cluster gene Pdx is primarily expressed in a spatial pattern that marks a zone of the body, in this case a region of the developing endoderm in vertebrates, amphioxus, echinoderms, acorn worm, annelid worm and a gastropod mollusc1,3,4,8,9,10,11,12,13,14. This expression is thought to specify the fate of a central endoderm zone and, consistent with this view, homozygous inactivation or deletion of Pdx1 in mice or humans results in absence of the pancreas and anterior duodenum9,10,15,16,17. In vertebrates, spatial expression persists into the adult where Pdx1 is expressed in beta-cells of the pancreatic islets and is a direct transcriptional activator of several targets including the insulin gene18.

Although Hox and ParaHox gene expression is broadly similar between phyla, it is not clear whether their transcriptional interactions are conserved. The upstream processes that establish Hox gene expression boundaries are different between vertebrates and insects, and not well understood for ParaHox genes. Downstream of Hox and ParaHox genes there is also little indication of deeply conserved targets thus far. This contrasts with a homeobox gene of the PRD class, Pax6, for which some ancient conserved targets are known, including Mab21 (in nematode and mouse), an insulin-like peptide gene (in Drosophila and mouse)19 and crystallin genes (in scallop and mouse)20. To gain insight into the ancestry of vertebrate genetic regulatory processes, ideally, we must make comparisons to the other great clades of bilaterian animals, the Ecdysozoa and the Lophotrochozoa. Characters that are homologous between vertebrates and either of these clades must date back to the base of the Bilateria. It is notable, however, that members of the Lophotrochozoa share more genome characters in common with Deuterostomia (including vertebrates), because of extensive divergence and secondary loss of genes in Ecdysozoa21. The Pdx gene is a good example, having been secondarily lost in almost all Ecdysozoa, including Drosophila and Caenorhabditis2. We therefore investigated whether the Pdx might be a direct regulator of an insulin gene in a member of the Lophotrochozoa, the Pacific oyster Crassostrea gigas. If the oyster Pdx does regulate insulin gene expression then it is likely this target gene interaction dates to the base of Bilateria. A practical difficulty with testing this hypothesis is that the evolutionary history of insulin-related genes is complex, with numerous duplications and losses across animal evolution. Insulin-related genes in the genome of Pacific oyster have been well characterised and one gene, cgILP, is suggested to be a lophotrochozoan orthologue of insulin/IGF22. In this study, we further analyse the expression of cgILP using quantitative RT-PCR and in situ hybridisation, and use an Assay for Transposase-Accessible Chromatin with high throughput sequencing (ATAC-seq) to uncover putative regulatory elements containing predicted Pdx-binding sites. Chromatin immunoprecipitation suggests binding of Pdx protein, and luciferase assays in cell culture verifies the ability to activate gene expression through this non-coding site 1.8 kb upstream of the oyster cgILP gene. These data argue that regulation of insulin gene expression by Pdx dates back to the origin of Bilateria.

Results

Co-expression of cgILP and cgPdx in oyster digestive tissue

We conducted further phylogenetic analyses on the insulin-like peptides identified previously in the Pacific oyster genome22,23,24: cgMIP123, cgMIP4, cgMILP7 and cgILP, incorporating sequences from across the Metazoa (Supplementary Data 1 and Fig. 1). The result is generally consistent with previous reports22,25, with minor topological differences in tree inference. The four oyster genes analysed do not group closely together, unlike the multiple insulin-related genes reported from spider (Stegodyphus) and silkmoth (Bombyx) (Fig. 1; Supplementary Fig. 2). Two of the oyster genes (cgMIP123 and cgMIP4) consistently group with the Molluscan Insulin Peptide (MIP) group and are physically linked indicative of tandem duplication, as reported previously22. cgMILP7 is a likely orthologue of Drosophila22, beetle and termite ILP7, a conclusion also supported by their predicted chain structure (Supplementary Table 1). Precise tree topology is dependent on alignment and sampling, and although cgILP is placed less precisely in our analysis, we find that it groups with chordate insulin/IGF genes, Bombyxins and spider genes (Fig. 1), supporting the close relationship with insulin22.

Fig. 1: Phylogenetic analysis of insulin-related peptides (RAxML method).
figure1

Species: Bcal Branchiostoma californiense (California amphioxus), Bbel B. belcheri tsingtauense (Chinese amphioxus), Bflo B. floridae (Florida amphioxus), Cgig Crassostrea gigas (Pacific oyster), Smim Stegodyphus mimosarum (spider), Lsta Lymnaea stagnalis (snail), Acal Aplysia californica (sea hare), Tdio Tritonia diomedea (sea slug), Dmel Drosophila melanogaster (fruitfly), Tcas Tribolium castaneum (beetle), Znev Zootermopsis nevadensis (termite), Cele Caenorhabditis elegans (nematode). Some species are covered by collapsed sub-trees, see Supplementary Data 1, Figs. 1 and 2 for details.

The simplest explanation for these results is that there was an early diversification of insulin-related genes in metazoan evolution22, followed by loss of genes in many taxa including vertebrates. cgILP is the putative orthologue of vertebrate insulin/IGF genes.

A previous report revealed digestive gland expression of cgILP and proposed the possible involvement in the control of digestion and gametogenesis22. We further conducted realtime quantitative reverse transcription PCR (qPCR) and in situ hybridisation and confirmed that only cgILP has expression specific to the endodermal cell layer of oyster hepatopancreas and stomach (Fig. 2a–j), comparable to the endodermal expression of vertebrate insulin22. Analysis on the oyster cgPdx homeobox gene further revealed the overlap with cgILP in the endodermal lining of digestive tissues (Fig. 2a, k–m). High expression of cgILP and cgPdx in the digestive gland (mainly composed of hepatopancreas) is consistent with previous studies22,23 (Supplementary Table 2).

Fig. 2: Analysis of oyster ILPs and Pdx gene expression.
figure2

a qPCR survey of gene expression levels in oyster tissues for cgMIP123, cgMIP4, cgMILP7, cgILP and cgPdx. Within each gene, qPCR results were normalised to the average value of the tissue with the highest relative quantification (RQ). Error bars represent 95% confidence intervals around the mean of RQs (n = 1 cDNA sample mixed from three animals). Three (cgILP and cgPdx) or four (cgMIP123, cgMIP4 and cgMILP7) technical replications were conducted. Lpa labial palps, Gil gill, Man mantle, Wam white adductor muscle, Tam transparent adductor muscle, Neu neuron, Hea heart, Hem haemolymph, Mgo male gonad, Fgo female gonad, Hep hepatopancreas, Sto stomach, Int intestine. Broad blue arrows leading from qPCR panels to rows of images indicate in situ hybridisation analysis using the indicated genes (bm). White arrows point to sites of gene expression. Adjacent sections were used to compare sense controls (b, e, h, k) with antisense tests (c, d, f, g, i, j, l, m), to compare expression between cgMIP123 and cgMIP4, and to compare cgILP and cgPdx gene expression. c, d Adult section showing cgMIP123 expression in a branchial neuron (possibly the cerebro-visceral connective). f, g Adjacent sections showing cgMIP4 expression in identical sites to cgMIP123. i, j Sections showing cgILP expression in the stomach wall and ducts of the hepatopancreas. l, m Adjacent sections showing cgPdx expression in identical sites to cgILP, except for additional staining of cgPdx RNA in parts of the gut wall (compare panel m to j). Abbreviations (pointed by black arrows): st stomach, in intestine, lp labial palps, ma mantle, ne neuron, hp hepatopancreas. Bar under each panel marks, 500 μm (b, c, e, f, h, i, k, l), 250 μm (j, m), 15 μm (d, g). Representative of at least two independent experiments for bm. Source data are provided as a Source Data file.

Sequence characteristics of oyster Pdx protein

Alignment of Pdx amino acid sequences from vertebrates, amphioxus and bivalves highlights strong conservation of the homeodomain and hexapeptide, and weaker but clear conservation of an N-terminal transcriptional activation domain26 (Supplementary Fig. 3). Amino acids at several key sites, where mutations are associated with human diabetes (e.g. Q59L and P33T), are conserved in the oyster.

RNAseq analysis of oyster hepatopancreas

Expression of oyster cgILP and cgPdx genes in hepatopancreas parallels co-expression of vertebrate insulin and Pdx1 in the pancreas, but arguments for homology would be stronger if hepatopancreas had functional similarity to vertebrate pancreas or midgut. As previous RNAseq from oyster digestive gland23 included hepatopancreas and other tissues, we conducted RNAseq specifically on oyster hepatopancreas tissue. We identified 1527 hepatopancreas-enriched genes by comparing to transcriptomes from other oyster tissues (Supplementary Data 2). Gene ontology analysis reveals enrichment in genes encoding enzymes (deaminase, hydrolase, lyase, oxidoreductase, and transferase, plus enzyme activators and inhibitors), compatible with a digestive role (Supplementary Fig. 4). Included were homologues of several digestive enzymes produced by the vertebrate pancreas notably trypsin (NCBI accession: LOC105348513), chymotrypsin (LOC105331575), pancreatic triacylglycerol lipases (LOC105329552, LOC105329276, LOC105340853, and LOC105344176), pancreatic lipase-related protein (LOC105331423, LOC105331427, and LOC105331424), pancreatic alpha-amylase (LOC105342874), and other alpha-amylase-like genes (LOC105348751 and LOC105348748).

In addition to cgILP, several other genes were related to insulin function. These include Neuroendocrine Convertase 1-like (cgPCSK1, LOC105344671) possibly orthologous to the PC1/3 enzyme that cleaves pro-insulin to liberate C-peptide27, X-Box-Binding Protein 1-like (cgXBP1, LOC105344684) thought to mediate insulin action and expressed in human pancreas and liver28, Regulatory Factor X6 (cgRfx6, LOC105331217) required for differentiation of insulin-producing islet cells, and the homeobox genes NK2 Homeobox 2 (cgNkx2.2, LOC105335274) and Pituitary Homeobox (cgPitx, LOC105337384) orthologous to genes involved in the development of vertebrate pancreas and islet cells29,30,31. cgPdx transcripts were present in the hepatopancreas RNAseq dataset but not the organ-enriched subset, due to additional expression in gonad tissues. The latter is inconsistent with qPCR and may reflect contamination by intestine tissue coiled inside the gonad.

ATAC-seq profiling of oyster hepatopancreas

Conservation of the transactivation domain and homeodomain, as well as the overlapping expression of oyster cgPdx with cgILP, are compatible with direct regulation, comparable to the transcriptional regulation of vertebrate insulin by Pdx1. To examine this hypothesis, we first examined the chromatin accessibility landscape in the oyster hepatopancreas using ATAC-seq (Figs. 3 and 4)32, after optimising methods for dissociating and isolating hepatopancreas cells. After data processing, we obtained 168,206 peaks corresponding to accessible chromatin regions observed reproducibly in two replicates (r² > 0.88; Supplementary Fig. 5a). Of the called peaks, ~49% were situated in intergenic and intronic non-coding regions, 8.8% within putative promoters and 37.8% within coding exons (Supplementary Fig. 5b, c).

Fig. 3: Homeodomain TFBS and Pdx consensus motif are enriched in open chromatin promoter and enhancer peaks.
figure3

TFBS enrichment test p values after Bonferroni correction were assessed for Pdx consensus motif and 583 other consensus motifs.

We scanned these accessible chromatin peaks for consensus Pdx motifs obtained through Transcription Factor Binding Site (TFBS) clustering of five Pdx1 TFBSs derived from the literature (Supplementary Fig. 6). A total of 19,104 putative Pdx-binding sites were deemed statistically significant within the 168,206 accessible chromatin peaks (p < 0.05). The number is comparable with observed binding peaks in human pancreatic islet cells analysed with ChIPseq (18,294)33 or ATAC-seq (~6000)34. A total of 795 oyster hepatopancreas-enriched genes were detected to have putative Pdx-binding sites in associated ATAC-seq peaks; of these, 56 are orthologous to genes predicted to be Pdx1 targets in previous high throughput studies on human or mouse35,36,37,38,39 (Supplementary Data 3 and Fig. 7). To further assess the accuracy of binding site enrichment analysis in our dataset, we also employed a set of 623 TFBSs to search all open chromatin peaks, and found that 583/623 were present in our dataset in more than one copy (Fig. 3). TFBSs were uncovered predominantly in promoters rather than enhancers. We did not detect any other consensus or individual homeodomain motifs overlapping with the predicted Pdx sites, although different homeodomain sites were enriched, confirming the specificity of Pdx-binding site searches (Fig. 3).

Interestingly, we found a broad ATAC-seq peak upstream of cgILP gene containing a predicted Pdx-binding site (A-box, TTCTAATTAC at −1806 bp), consistent with a putative cis-regulatory role of these regions in cgILP regulation. Possible binding sites of other transcription factors were also identified, including a putative E-box (at −1760 bp: CAGTTG) which could potentially bind the bHLH transcription factor NeuroD implicated in insulin gene regulation40, and a possible hormone response element (HRE at −1735: AGGTCA) which might bind the nuclear receptor HNF4a41 (Fig. 4). Putative Pdx-binding sites were also identified at ATAC-seq peaks upstream of cgPCSK1 and cgXBP1 at positions −85 bp (TGCTAATTGG) and −2448 bp (GTCTAATTGA) respectively; these loci are orthologous to genes implicated in pro-insulin processing in mammals (Supplementary Fig. 8).

Fig. 4: Potential transcription factors binding sites (A-box, E-box, and HRE) identified by ATAC-seq peak.
figure4

A 72 bp region (green box) was used for dual-luciferase assays. Gene structure of cgILP is shown in the top bars, where purple bars indicate exons, and arrows along the line indicate transcriptional orientation. The ATAC-seq peaks are not direct extrapolation of the regions with the highest sequencing signal as the calling process takes into account both replicates, the averaged background over a window, and the shift induced by the library construction process.

Pdx regulation of transcription through a non-coding element

As oyster cultured cell lines and transgenic approaches are currently unavailable, we conducted dual-luciferase assays in HeLa and COS7 cells to examine if the putative Pdx TFBS upstream of cgILP is responsive to oyster Pdx protein. First, we used a vector delivering a fluorescent protein (GFP)-tagged protein to confirm that oyster Pdx is successfully transported to the cell nucleus (Supplementary Fig. 9). Second, we ectopically expressed untagged oyster Pdx protein together with a reporter gene comprising the putative response element (A-box, B1 in Fig. 4) driving expression of firefly luciferase and a transfection control plasmid. Gradient experiments indicated that the activation effect through element B1 was influenced by the quantities of transfected cgPdx expression plasmids (Fig. 5a). The activation effect is weak in HeLa cells, where only 1.2–1.4 fold increase was observed, even when 500 ng Pdx expression plasmid was used (Supplementary Fig. 10a); however, in COS7 cells the transactivation responses are much more robust for both cgPdx and mPdx1 (Fig. 5a and Supplementary Fig. 10b). When the central TAAT was mutated into TACT (B2M1, Fig. 4), the transcriptional activation was decreased. In contrast, mutating a second TAAT site within the region (B2M2) had no effect on the transcriptional activation (Supplementary Fig. 10d, e). These results suggest that the cgPdx protein is capable of transactivating expression through the predicted A-sequence found upstream of the cgILP gene.

Fig. 5: Transcriptional activity of oyster cgPdx and cgNeuroD in cell culture and oyster hepatopancreas tissue.
figure5

a Transcriptional activity of oyster cgPdx on cgILP B1 element in COS7 cells demonstrating dose-dependent induction of luciferase reporter gene expression. Points show values of each individual assay. Violin and box plots are used to show the distribution of the data, with the mean at the right side. p values of comparisons (two-sided t-test) between adjacent groups are shown. b Transcriptional activity of cgNeuroD on cgILP B1 element in COS7 cells showing a similar but weaker dose-dependent induction effect. c Co-transfection of cgPdx and cgNeuroD gives higher transcriptional activity than the sum of the individual activities, suggesting functional synergy between cgPdx and cgNeuroD proteins. 150 ng of cgPdx and cgNeuroD plasmids was used for group (cgPdx + cgNeuroD). The pool of all the possible sums of individual relative luciferase values between cgNeuroD and cgPdx groups was used to estimate the 95% confidence interval (CI) of the activity sum. Significance of difference between group (cgPdx + cgNeuroD) and the sum of cgNeuroD and cgPdx groups was calculated by bootstrapping (n = 100,000). For experiments in ac, n = 3 biologically independent cells by two technically independent measurements. Box represents a range from the first to the third quartile while whisker shows the minimum and maximum values. The line in each box shows the median. Relative luciferase activity in the cells transfected with blank pSI and the reporter plasmid is set at 1.00. p values were calculated by two tailed Student’s t test and Holm’s method to correct for multiple comparisons (p.adj). df ChIP-qPCR assays on predicted cgPdx binding sites upstream of three putative Pdx target genes in oyster (cgILP, cgPCSK1, and cgXBP1). Two anti-cgPdx polyclonal antibodies (E9112 and E9113) were used to assay two oyster hepatopancreas samples (Hep1 and Hep2). Source data are provided as a Source Data file.

To test if Pdx activity is enhanced by a co-factor, we also introduced the oyster orthologue of NeuroD, a bHLH protein. A similar dose-dependent, but weaker activity, was observed when a cgNeuroD expression plasmid was transfected into COS7 cells along with the cgILP B1 site reporter gene (Fig. 5b). Co-transfecting cgPdx and cgNeuroD expression plasmids, plus the reporter gene, revealed a synergistic response. The transcriptional activity level of the target reporter gene was significantly higher than the sum of the individual activities when the two plasmids were transfected separately (Fig. 5c). A similar but stronger synergistic effect was also observed when co-transfecting cgNeuroD and mPdx1 expression plasmids (Supplementary Fig. 10c).

To test whether oyster Pdx protein was bound to this site in vivo, we raised two polyclonal antibodies (E9112 and E9113) against cgPdx-specific peptide (1–160 amino acids) and conducted four ChIP-qPCR assays on oyster hepatopancreas tissue. These experiments revealed that DNA at the predicted site around the ATAC-seq peak (B1) had significantly higher fold enrichment (~2.2 times, p < 0.05, Fig. 5d) than the mock (IgG). This adds support to the proposal that Pdx protein regulates cgILP gene expression in adult oysters. We also tested whether oyster Pdx protein was binding DNA around other putative target genes; we found the putative Pdx-binding site upstream of cgPCSK1 also showed higher fold enrichment (~2.47 times, p < 0.05, Fig. 5e), but the cgXBP1 site did not (Fig. 5f).

Discussion

The discovery of homeobox genes with similar expression patterns in widely divergent phyla triggered a revolution in biology. From the mid-1980s onwards, a series of studies questioned the view that body form was built and maintained by different genes in different phyla and supplemented it with a concept stressing evolutionary modification of a shared ‘tool-kit’ of genes. However, finding similar gene expression patterns does not demonstrate equivalent function. For some homeobox genes, notably Hox genes, mutation and gene deletion experiments in vertebrates and arthropods have demonstrated comparable roles in specifying regional identity in the embryo, although the suites of downstream target genes regulated by Hox genes have not yet been elucidated. The ParaHox genes are as ancient as Hox genes, sharing a common ancestry dating back to before the divergence of cnidarians and bilaterians42. The central ParaHox gene, Pdx, is the best studied due to its involvement in insulin regulation and since mutations in this gene are implicated in monogenic type 2 diabetes in humans.

The Pdx homeobox gene has embryonic and adult functions. In the development of vertebrates, amphioxus, annelids, molluscs and echinoderms, the gene is expressed in a zone or domain of the endoderm, which in mouse is fated to become the pancreas plus parts of the duodenum, bile duct and stomach10. As development proceeds, the expression of Pdx (called Pdx1 in vertebrates) becomes more localised and restricted to pancreatic islets. Within islets, Pdx1 is a direct transcriptional activator for insulin, somatostatin and other genes. It is not known how ancient is the regulation of insulin transcription by Pdx.

The Insulin superfamily is well understood in vertebrates, and can be divided into an insulin/insulin growth factor (IGF) group and a relaxin/insulin-like peptide (RLN/INSL) group. All possess cysteine residues forming disulphide bonds within and between peptide chains. Insulin/IGF proteins function mainly as metabolic regulators and mitogenic growth factors; relaxin/INSL proteins have roles in reproduction and neuroendocrine regulation, signalling through G-protein coupled receptors. Comparison between vertebrate and tunicate genomes reveal that insulin/IGF genes diversified through a tandem duplication event followed by genome duplications in vertebrates and further tandem duplications43. The picture becomes more confusing as other invertebrates are examined. The silk moth Bombyx mori has a large number of insulin-related Bombyxin sequences, closely similar to each other, but other insects have quite different genes such as Drosophila ILP7. Spiders have a set of duplicate insulin-related genes that look different again, as does the diversity of insulin-related genes in nematodes and a greatly expanded set in molluscs, especially venomous cone snails44.

The existence of insulin-like peptides in a bivalve mollusc, Mya arenaria, was actually reported shortly after the discovery of insulin45. Cloning and sequencing of a cDNA for a molluscan insulin-related peptide (MIP) was reported in the 1980s46. However, this initial ILP gene from a snail, and the first reported oyster ILP gene47 were expressed in neurons (the latter is now designated cgMIP123 gene). Genome sequencing revealed that both the limpet Lottia gigantea and the Pacific oyster genome have multiple insulin-related genes, including a γ-type ILP sharing a conserved structure with vertebrate insulin/IGFs22,25. Furthermore, Pacific oyster cgILP is expressed in the digestive gland22. Using qPCR and in situ hybridisation we further studied the expression of this gene in the complex digestive gland of adult oysters, and found that expression of cgILP overlaps with the Pdx homeobox gene in the endodermal cell layer of hepatopancreas and other gut tissues. The enrichment of cgPdx, cgILP, as well as its processing convertase cgPCSK1 is comparable to endodermal expression of insulin and Pdx1 in vertebrate developing gut and adult pancreas. We note that expression of the two genes is not precisely congruent in oyster, nor indeed in vertebrates. Indeed, Pdx1 contributes to other biological processes in vertebrates, such as activating other genes (somatostatin and glucokinase). We do not suggest that the complex tube system of the oyster hepatopancreas is homologous ‘as an organ’ to the vertebrate pancreas48. This is because some taxa (e.g. amphioxus and hagfish) lack a clear pancreas, with insulin-producing cells found in the gut or bile duct mucosa48. Thus, we suggest that oyster hepatopancreas evolved in parallel to the vertebrate pancreas.

A caveat to the expression similarities between oyster and vertebrates centres on whether the oyster hepatopancreas shares functional parallels with the vertebrate pancreas. The functions of the molluscan hepatopancreas are incompletely understood, with the organ’s compound name suggestive of both liver and pancreas-like functions while there are also data supporting immune-related roles49. In mammals, liver and ventral pancreas bud have a close lineage relationship, and may arise from the same precursors in the foregut endoderm50; indeed, Pdx1 plays key roles during the pancreas differentiation by repressing hepatic genes35. We used RNAseq to test whether oyster hepatopancreas has similarities to the vertebrate pancreas, finding that the oyster hepatopancreas transcriptome is enriched in genes typical of the digestive functions of the vertebrate exocrine pancreas (trypsin, chymotrypsin, lipases, amylase) and contains several genes associated with islet differentiation and insulin processing in the endocrine pancreas. These data are suggestive of comparable functions, but even if precise physiological functions differ between oyster and vertebrates there is little doubt that bilaterian midguts are homologous51,52. We conclude that the molluscan hepatopancreas and the vertebrate pancreas evolved from a homologous endodermal region expressing Pdx and insulin in the latest common ancestor of bilaterians.

In vertebrates, Pdx is a key transcriptional activator of the insulin gene, with its activity is modulated by co-factors53. We used a cell culture system to test if oyster Pdx protein, with or without a bHLH co-factor, can activate gene expression through a putative binding site identified upstream of the cgILP gene. The putative binding site (named B1) contains a canonical Pdx-binding sequence and is located in a broad accessible chromatin region revealed by ATAC-seq on oyster hepatopancreas tissue. In cell culture assays, we find that cgPdx can indeed transactivate gene expression through the B1 site found upstream of cgILP. Furthermore, when the bHLH protein cgNeuroD was co-expressed along with cgPdx, a greater transcriptional response was detected, suggesting a synergistic interaction between the two oyster transcription factors. We suggest that cgNeuroD may function through binding to a nearby E-box (Fig. 4). However, further verification of the suggested synergistic interaction is necessary because of the complexity of insulin transcriptional regulation and the limitation of the heterologous cell system used in this study. We suggest there will be differences to vertebrates, because we did not detect other potential regulatory motifs nearby, in contrast to the density of such elements in vertebrates54. We also stress that the open chromatin peak identified in this study reflect only one chromatin regulatory status; it is possible that in some cell types there are additional conserved or novel TFBSs upstream to or neighbouring cgILP.

The ATAC-seq studies performed here reveal a large number of open chromatin regions close to other genes that are worthy of further investigation, including a genome-wide accessibility map for a consensus set of 584 transcription factors, providing clues to additional transcription factors potentially involved in regulating gene expression in the oyster hepatopancreas. Curiously, although we observe a larger number of putative distal cis-regulatory elements (enhancers) than of putative proximal (promoter) elements, enrichment of TFBS was primarily observed in the proximal elements, indicative of a more compact gene regulatory architecture than previously described in vertebrate systems.

Three genes containing a Pdx-binding motif in proximal ATAC-seq peaks were further assayed to test for transcription factor binding in vivo. Of these, elements upstream of cgILP and cgPCSK1 both showed significant DNA enrichment after immunoprecipitation with cgPdx antibodies; a weak ATAC-seq peak upstream of cgXBP1 did not (Supplementary Fig. 8). However, the evidence for protein-binding in vivo should be treated as indicative rather than conclusive until the newly generated antibodies used in this study are further validated55. For example, although western blots using E9112 and E9113 showed a signal around the expected cgPdx molecular weight, other bands are also detected, especially with E9113.

In summary, our data indicate that the Pacific oyster, a lophotrochozoan, has retained several insulin-related genes, including a putative orthologue of insulin/IGF genes. The cgILP, is co-expressed with the cgPdx homeobox gene and cgPCSK1 proprotein convertase gene in the endoderm of oyster hepatopancreas, a tissue we find has gene expression similarity to the exocrine and endocrine pancreas. Experimental analyses indicate the potential ability of oyster cgPdx and cgNeuroD to activate synergistically transcription of cgILP through a predicted binding site, comparable to Pdx1 and NeuroD1 activation of insulin in vertebrates. These findings suggest that a classic homeodomain-target gene interaction dates back to the base of Bilateria. Finding such conserved interactions has important implications for comparative biology, since it allows us to move beyond comparing gene expression patterns and commence examination of the conservation of regulatory modules. The latter are likely to prove more reliable markers of evolutionary homology and enable deeper insight into evolutionary mechanisms.

Methods

Phylogenetic analysis and gene structure prediction

Deduced peptide sequences for Insulin superfamily members included 20 from Mollusca, 30 from Ecdysozoa, and 51 from Deuterostomia (Supplementary Data 1). Putative orthologues between human and oyster were identified by reciprocal best-hit Blast with an E-value cutoff of 1e−556. Pdx sequences were retrieved from NCBI (Supplementary Fig. 3). Multiple alignment was conducted with MAFFT 7.22157 using the L-INS-I algorithm, and trimmed with TrimAl using parameters –gt 0.9 –st 0.001 –cons 4058. Phylogenetic trees were constructed with RAxML59 using the evolutionary model LG + Gamma+Invariant and 1000 bootstrap replicates. UGENE60 was used for alignment visualisation. For oyster ILP sequences23, signal peptides were predicted by SignalP 4.161, mature peptide chains predicted from adjacent pairs of basic residues62. For Pdx alignment visualisation, amino acids colours were coded according to their degree of evolutionary conservation and physicochemical properties using the colour scheme Zappo from Jalview63.

Animal material

Three-year old Pacific oysters (C. gigas) used for qPCR and in situ hybridisation, RNA-seq, ATAC-seq and gene cloning were from the Oxford Covered Market, reportedly collected from the Scottish coast, and were acclimated in artificial seawater at 16 °C for 7 days before use. Oysters were fed with Spirulina powder during culture. Species identification was confirmed by sequencing the mitochondrial cytochrome oxidase I gene. Tissues from three individuals were dissected to obtain labial palps, gill, mantle, white adductor muscle, transparent adductor muscle, neuron, heart, haemolymph, male gonad, female gonad, hepatopancreas, stomach and intestine for immediate RNA extraction.

RNA extraction and qPCR

Total RNA was extracted following a standard TRIzol protocol (Invitrogen, USA) and treated with DNase I (Promega, USA). RNAs from three individuals were equally mixed before synthesis of the first-strand cDNA with GoScript™ RT (Promega, USA) according to the supplier’s instructions. Primers for qPCR on oyster insulin-like genes, Pdx and as an internal control cgEF1a are given in Supplementary Data 4. Realtime qPCR was conducted on the Prime Pro 48 realtime qPCR system (Techne, UK). The 2−ΔΔt method was used to calculate the relative quantification (RQ) of target genes. R software64 was used for statistics and plotting.

Assay for transposase accessible chromatin

To maintain osmolarity, modified Dulbecco’s phosphate buffered saline (MDPBS) was used to incubate oyster cells throughout. Fresh hepatopancreas tissue fragments were incubated in 0.8 mg/ml collagenase P (Sigma, 11213857001) at room temperature for 20 min and gently pipetted every 5 min to release single cells. The cell suspension was filtered through a 40 μm cell strainer (BD Falcon, USA), transferred to a new tube, and centrifuged for 5 min at 500 × g. The supernatant was discarded, and the pellet suspended in MDPBS for cell viability analysis and cell counting. For each reaction 50,000 cells were collected at 1000 × g for 5 min, 4 °C. The transposition reaction, purification, library construction and quantitation followed established methods65, including tagmentation using a Nextera DNA kit (Illumina FC-121-1030) for 30 minutes at 37 °C, amplification of tagmented DNA using NEB Next High-Fidelity 2X PCR Master Mix for 11 cycles. Library quality was assessed using Agilent Tapestation.

Two samples were sequenced using 40 bp paired-end reads on the Illumina NextSeq 500 platform giving 43 and 17.5 million pairs of reads, respectively. Reads were mapped using Bowtie 2 (v. 2.1.0) to C. gigas genome v.9 obtained from NCBI yielding 79.8% and 74.8% of sequenced reads respectively mapped to the nuclear genome. Peaks were called on each sample using MACS2 (v. 2.1.1) using ‘—nomodel—shiftsize 250—nolambda’ parameters. Only peaks recovered in both replicates and longer than 100 bp were retained. Peaks were further filtered to remove regions overlapping with repetitive sequences derived from a combined repeat annotation modeller (RepeatModeler66, DUST67 and TRF68 filters), yielding a total of 168,206 consensus open chromatin regions genome-wide. Consensus peaks were assigned to genes denoted by C. gigas gene models obtained from NCBI using Homer (v.4.9) annotatePeaks.pl script. From this annotation, open chromatin regions corresponding to proximal and distal putative cis-regulatory elements were inferred. TFBS analysis was performed using the Gimme motifs suite (v.0.11.1)69. Position Weighted Matrices (PWMs) for individual TFBSs corresponding to PDX1 (human PDX1 sites: M5712_1.02, M5713_1.02, M6415_1.02 and mouse Pdx1 sites: M0976_1.02, M1952_1.02) were obtained from CIS-BP online library of transcription factors and their DNA binding motifs at http://cisbp.ccbr.utoronto.ca70. Mouse and human PWMs were clustered using gimme cluster command to yield one averaged cluster motif (consensus site) ‘Pdx_Average_2’ that resulted from clustering of 3 sites (Human M5713_1.02, Mouse M1952_1.02, Human M6415_1.02), a second cluster consisting of a single motif that corresponds to a doubled site of two TAAT motifs next to each other (Human M5712_1.02) and a third single motif corresponding to less prominent TAAT site (Mouse M0976_1.02). Background regions were generated using ‘gimme background -random’ command using C. gigas genome as reference. Threshold values were obtained based on background sequences using gimme threshold command with ‘fpr = 0.01’ for each of the individual PWMs and the Pdx_Average_2 TFBS. TFBS were identified using gimme scan using cutoff values obtained from ‘gimme threshold’ step on all consensus peaks. Both Pdx_Average_2 and Pdx_M1952_1.01 PWMs identified the experimentally validated Pdx1 sites located at −1806 (TTCTAATTAC) on scaffold737:266144-266153 but failed to recognise the flanking bases (5′-T and C-3′ respectively). In addition, a pre-clustered set of 623 motifs generated from CIS-BP motifs (http://dx.doi.org/https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.1555851)71, TFBS sites (v.3), was used to scan consensus peak set as described above. Specific Pdx1 sites were not recovered by any other clustered Homeodomain PWMs confirming specificity of analysis.

RNA sequencing and differential expression analysis

RNA sequencing (RNAseq) was performed using 75 bp paired-end (PE) sequencing on the Illumina HiSeq 4000 platform (Illumina, Inc., San Diego, CA, USA) from a hepatopancreas TruSeq library from the same individual as used for ATAC-seq. A total of 33.11 million PE reads were obtained with 4880 Mb Q20 yield. Data were analysed alongside published sequencing reads from additional organs (including ‘digestive gland’, potentially the same as hepatopancreas)23. Raw sequencing reads were mapped to the oyster genome with HISAT2 and further processed with the tools StringTie, and Ballgown72. Mapped read counts were used to identify differentially expressed genes using edgeR73, and gene expression levels quantified as fragments per kilobase per million mapped reads (FPKM). Hepatopancreas-enriched genes were defined as those genes having higher expression levels (p < 0.05) in both ‘digestive gland’ and the newly collected ‘hepatopancreas’ sample compared to other organs (adductor muscle, labial palps, gill, haemolymph, mantle, male gonad, and female gonad).

Plasmid constructs

For riboprobe generation, amplified fragments of cgPdx (489 bp), cgMIP123 (608 bp), cgMIP4 (679 bp), cgMILP7 (359 bp) and cgILP (332 bp) were cloned into pGEM-T easy (Promega, USA). For assessing subcellular localisation, cgPdx coding sequence was amplified with primers containing XhoI sites and ligated into XhoI-digested pEGFP-N1 vector (Clontech, USA) to generate an in-frame fusion with EGFP (construct pEGFP-Pdx). For luciferase assays, untagged mPdx1, cgPdx (LOC10532739074) and cgNeuroD (LOC10533675575) plasmids were constructed by cloning into XhoI and MluI sites in the pSI expression vector (Promega, USA; construct pSI-mPdx1, pSI-cgPdx, pSI-cgNeuroD). As firefly luciferase reporter constructs, corresponding genomic regions upstream of cgILP were ligated into the pGL4.23[luc2/minP] vector (Promega, USA; constructs pGL-B1). Three short versions (two with altered TAAT sites) were generated by in vitro mutagenesis (constructs pGL-B2, pGL-B2M1 and pGL-B2M2, Fig. 4). Altered TAAT sites were generated by designing mismatched base in primers covering the sites. Primers were given in Supplementary Data 4.

Antibody synthesis and ChIP-qPCR

The coding sequence of cgPdx peptide 1–160 was cloned into pET-28a-SUMO vector, and expressed in BL21(DE3) cells. The SUMO-tagged recombinant protein was purified by Ni-NTA affinity chromatography (Qiagen); rabbit anti-cgPdx polyclonal antibodies, E9112 and E9113, were developed by Abclonal (Wuhan, China). Validation of antibodies was conducted by western blotting on tissue lysates of oyster hepatopancreas (Supplementary Fig. 11). The full coding sequence of cgPdx was cloned in-frame (see Supplementary Data 4 for primers) with a V5 tag at the C-terminal (pSF-CMV-Puro-COOH-V5, Oxford Genetics) and expressed in HEK293T cells. Western blotting was then performed with the cell lysate to determine the molecular weight of cgPdx. Specificity of antibodies was tested by western blotting on oyster hepatopancreas lysate; anti-PARP1 antibody (ab32138, abcam, Shanghai, China) was used as a positive control. ChIP assays were performed according to a standard protocol (Abcam) with minor modifications. In brief, oyster hepatopancreas tissue pieces were dissected, frozen on liquid nitrogen and stored at −80 °C until use. Single cells were isolated using methods described for ATAC. Harvested cells were cross-linked with 1% formaldehyde for 10 min at room temperature, and soluble chromatin obtained after sonication was incubated with anti-cgPdx antibodies. Two ChIP experiments were conducted with different individuals. ~150 mg hepatopancreas tissue was used with 10 μg antibodies. Protein A (Millipore, 16–661) was used to precipitate chromatin immunocomplexes, which were washed and then DNA purified using QIAquick PCR Purification Kit (Qiagen). Primers (Supplementary Data 4) were designed for qPCR examination targeting potential Pdx-binding sites upstream three genes. ChIP DNA was then used as the template for qPCR analysis, with results normalised by input DNA. Fold enrichment was calculated according to the common ‘signal over background’ method (ThermoFisher). The significance of the mean of target’s fold enrichment to 1 was calculated with one-sample t-test (one-sided).

In situ hybridisation

Digoxygenin-labelled probes were synthesised from linearised constructs in sense and antisense directions, used in parallel for all experiments. Whole soft body tissue from juvenile oysters (shell length 1–3 cm) was fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde in PBS overnight at 4 °C. Tissues were washed twice in PBS, and dehydrated through a graded alcohol series before storage in 70% ethanol at −20 °C. For wax embedding, tissues were washed in 85% ethanol (15 min), 100% ethanol (3 × 15 min), methyl benzoate (3 × 15 min) and benzene (1 min) before transferring into melted paraffin (3 × 30 min). Blocks were solidified at 4 °C for at least 2 h, trimmed, mounted and stored overnight (4 °C) before sectioning at 10 μm. Sections were then de-waxed with xylene and treated with proteinase K (1 μg/ml, 15 min) before hybridisation (50% deionised formamide, 5× saline sodium citrate, 0.1% Tween-20, 10% sodium dodecyl sulfate, 0.3 mg/ml torula RNA, 50 μg/ml heparin) with 50 ng/μl probe at 65 °C, overnight. After washing with 0.2× saline sodium citrate and maleic acid buffer, riboprobes were detected by incubation with alkaline phosphatase-conjugated anti-DIG Fab fragments (1:4000; Roche Diagnostics, USA) in Roche blocking buffer in 100 mM maleic acid (2 h, room temperature). Colour development was conducted by incubation in NBT/BCIP (US Biological, Swampscott, MA). Sections were washed with distilled water, mounted in glycerol, and examined using a Leica MZ10F light microscope courtesy of Microscope Services Ltd, Oxford.

Luciferase assay

HeLa (ATCC, USA) and COS7 (kindly provided by Dr Qingfeng Yan, Zhejiang University, Zhejiang, China) cells were cultured in modified RPMI-1640 medium (HyClone, USA) supplemented with 10% heat-inactivated fetal bovine serum (Gibco, USA) and penicillin-streptomycin (Solarbio, China), in a humidified atmosphere with 5% CO2 at 37 °C. Plasmids were transfected into cells using Lipofectamine 3000 reagent (Life Technologies, USA) according to the supplier’s instructions. Luciferase assays were conducted in 24-well plates with ~250,000 cells and 500 μl medium/well; A total of 0.5 μg pSI expression plasmid DNA (by adding the blank pSI vectors to keep constant for each transfection) was transfected with 0.2 μg pGL-series reporter plasmids, and 1 ng control pRL-CMV Renilla luciferase plasmid (Promega, USA). At 24 h post-transfection, firefly and Renilla luciferase activities were measured using a Dual-Luciferase Reporter Assay System (Promega, USA) in a Varioskan Flash multimode reader (Thermo Scientific, USA). Each transfection was performed in triplicate for biological replicates, and wells divided into two to generate technical replicates. Student’s t test (two-sided) was used to determine the significance of differences. 95% confidence interval (CI) of the sum between cgNeuroD and cgPdx/mPdx1 was estimated based on the pool of all the possible combinations between the relative luciferase values from cgNeuroD and cgPdx/mPdx1 groups. Significance was then calculated by bootstrapping (n = 100,000), in which sum values with the same sample size as the group (cgPdx/mPdx1+cgNeuroD) were randomly sampled from the sum pool.

Reporting summary

Further information on research design is available in the Nature Research Reporting Summary linked to this article.

Data availability

The raw sequencing data and analysis results for C. gigas hepatopancreas RNAseq and ATAC-seq have been deposited in the Gene Expression Omnibus under accession code: GSE107713 and under BioProject PRJNA417263. Mapping details of reads onto the genome and ATAC-seq peak calling result can also be visualised by adding the hub http://zoo-animalia.zoo.ox.ac.uk/Cragig/hub2.txt into UCSC genome browser. The authors declare that the main data supporting the findings of this study are available within the article and its Supplementary Information. Source data are provided with this paper.

References

  1. 1.

    Brooke, N. M., Garcia-Fernandez, J. & Holland, P. W. H. The ParaHox gene cluster is an evolutionary sister of the Hox gene cluster. Nature 392, 920–922 (1998).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Ferrier, D. E. K. & Holland, P. W. H. Sipunculan ParaHox genes. Evol. Dev. 3, 263–270, https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1525-142x.2001.003004263.x (2001).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Annunziata, R., Martinez, P. & Arnone, M. I. Intact cluster and chordate-like expression of ParaHox genes in a sea star. BMC Biol. 11, 68, https://doi.org/10.1186/1741-7007-11-68 (2013).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Ikuta, T. et al. Identification of an intact ParaHox cluster with temporal colinearity but altered spatial colinearity in the hemichordate Ptychodera flava. BMC Evol. Biol. 13, 129, https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2148-13-129 (2013).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Takeuchi, T. et al. Bivalve-specific gene expansion in the pearl oyster genome: implications of adaptation to a sessile lifestyle. Zool. Lett. 2, 3, https://doi.org/10.1186/s40851-016-0039-2 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Wang, S. et al. Scallop genome provides insights into evolution of bilaterian karyotype and development. Nat. Ecol. Evol. 1, 120, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41559-017-0120 (2017).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Mulley, J. F. & Holland, P. W. H. Parallel retention of Pdx2 genes in cartilaginous fish and coelacanths. Mol. Biol. Evol. 27, 2386–2391, https://doi.org/10.1093/molbev/msq121 (2010).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Wright, C., Schnegelsberg, P. & De Robertis, E. XlHbox 8: a novel Xenopus homeo protein restricted to a narrow band of endoderm. Development 105, 787–794 (1989).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Jonsson, J., Carlsson, L., Edlund, T. & Edlund, H. Insulin-promoter-factor1 is required for pancreas development in mice. Nature 371, 606–609 (1994).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Offield, M. et al. PDX-1 is required for pancreatic outgrowth and differentiation of the rostral duodenum. Development 122, 983–995 (1996).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Arnone, M. et al. Genetic organization and embryonic expression of the ParaHox genes in the sea urchin S. purpuratus: insights into the relationship between clustering and colinearity. Dev. Biol. 300, 63–73 (2006).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Wysocka-Diller, J., Aisemberg, G. & Macagno, E. A novel homeobox cluster expressed in repeated structures of the midgut. Dev. Biol. 171, 439–447 (1995).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Kulakova, M., Cook, C. & Andreeva, T. ParaHox gene expression in larval and postlarval development of the polychaete Nereis virens (Annelida, Lophotrochozoa). BMC Dev. Biol. 8, 61 (2008).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Samadi, L. & Steiner, G. Conservation of ParaHox genes’ function in patterning of the digestive tract of the marine gastropod Gibbula varia. BMC Dev. Biol. 10, 74 (2010).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Stoffers, D. A., Zinkin, N. T., Stanojevic, V., Clarke, W. L. & Habener, J. F. Pancreatic agenesis attributable to a single nucleotide deletion in the human IPF1 gene coding sequence. Nat. Genet. 15, 106–110 (1997).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Schwitzgebel, V. M. et al. Agenesis of human pancreas due to decreased half-life of insulin promoter factor 1. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 88, 4398–4406 (2003).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Thomas, I. H. et al. Neonatal diabetes mellitus with pancreatic agenesis in an infant with homozygous IPF-1 Pro63fsX60 mutation. Pediatr. Diabetes 10, 492–496 (2009).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Le Lay, J. & Stein, R. Involvement of PDX-1 in activation of human insulin gene transcription. J. Endocrinol. 188, 287–294, https://doi.org/10.1677/joe.1.06510 (2006).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Clements, J., Hens, K., Francis, C., Schellens, A. & Callaerts, P. Conserved role for the Drosophila Pax6 homolog Eyeless in differentiation and function of insulin-producing neurons. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 105, 16183–16188, https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0708330105 (2008).

    ADS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Cvekl, A. & Callaerts, P. PAX6: 25th anniversary and more to learn. Exp. Eye Res. 156, 10–21, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.exer.2016.04.017 (2017).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Luo, Y. J. et al. Nemertean and phoronid genomes reveal lophotrochozoan evolution and the origin of bilaterian heads. Nat. Ecol. Evol. 2, 141–151, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41559-017-0389-y (2018).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Cherif–Feildel, M. et al. Molecular evolution and functional characterisation of insulin related peptides in molluscs: contributions of Crassostrea gigas genomic and transcriptomic-wide screening. Gen. Comp. Endocrinol. 271, 15–29, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ygcen.2018.10.019 (2019).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Zhang, G. et al. The oyster genome reveals stress adaptation and complexity of shell formation. Nature 490, 49–54 (2012).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Hamano, K. & Awaji, M. cDNA cloning and expression analysis of insulin-related peptide gene and prohormone convertase gene in the Pacific oyster, Crassostrea gigas. Fish. Sci. 68, 769–771, https://doi.org/10.2331/fishsci.68.sup1_769 (2002).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Veenstra, J. A. Neurohormones and neuropeptides encoded by the genome of Lottia gigantea, with reference to other mollusks and insects. Gen. Comp. Endocrinol. 167, 86–103, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ygcen.2010.02.010 (2010).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Zhou, G. & Brunicardi, F. C. PDX1 (pancreatic and duodenal homeobox 1). Atlas Genet. Cytogenet. Oncol. Haematol. 15, 507–510 (2011).

    Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Smeekens, S. P. et al. Proinsulin Processing by the Subtilisin-Related Proprotein Convertases Furin, Pc2, and Pc3. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA. 89, 8822–8826, https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.89.18.8822 (1992).

    ADS  CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Lee, A.-H., Heidtman, K., Hotamisligil, G. S. & Glimcher, L. H. Dual and opposing roles of the unfolded protein response regulated by IRE1α and XBP1 in proinsulin processing and insulin secretion. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA. 108, 8885–8890, https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1105564108 (2011).

    ADS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Sussel, L. et al. Mice lacking the homeodomain transcription factor Nkx2.2 have diabetes due to arrested differentiation of pancreatic beta cells. Development 125, 2213–2221 (1998).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Jensen, J. Gene regulatory factors in pancreatic development. Dev. Dyn. 229, 176–200, https://doi.org/10.1002/dvdy.10460 (2004).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Pauls, S., Zecchin, E., Tiso, N., Bortolussi, M. & Argenton, F. Function and regulation of zebrafish nkx2.2a during development of pancreatic islet and ducts. Dev. Biol. 304, 875–890, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ydbio.2007.01.024 (2007).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Buenrostro, J. D., Giresi, P. G., Zaba, L. C., Chang, H. Y. & Greenleaf, W. J. Transposition of native chromatin for fast and sensitive epigenomic profiling of open chromatin, DNA-binding proteins and nucleosome position. Nat. Methods 10, 1213–1218, https://doi.org/10.1038/Nmeth.2688 (2013).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Pasquali, L. et al. Pancreatic islet enhancer clusters enriched in type 2 diabetes risk-associated variants. Nat. Genet. 46, 136 (2014).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    Bysani, M. et al. ATAC-seq reveals alterations in open chromatin in pancreatic islets from subjects with type 2 diabetes. Sci. Rep. 9, 7785 (2019).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    Teo, A. K. K. et al. PDX1 Binds and Represses Hepatic Genes to Ensure Robust Pancreatic Commitment in Differentiating Human Embryonic Stem Cells. Stem Cell Rep. 4, 578–590, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stemcr.2015.02.015 (2015).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    Khoo, C. et al. Research Resource: The Pdx1 Cistrome of Pancreatic Islets. Mol. Endocrinol. 26, 521–533, https://doi.org/10.1210/me.2011-1231 (2012).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  37. 37.

    Svensson, P. et al. Gene array identification of Ipf1/Pdx1(−/−) regulated genes in pancreatic progenitor cells. BMC Dev. Biol. 7, https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-213x-7-129 (2007).

  38. 38.

    Keller, D. M. et al. Characterization of pancreatic transcription factor pdx-1 binding sites using promoter Microarray and serial analysis of chromatin occupancy. J. Biol. Chem. 282, 32084–32092, https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M700899200 (2007).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. 39.

    Gu, G. Q. et al. Global expression analysis of gene regulatory pathways during endocrine pancreatic development. Development 131, 165–179, https://doi.org/10.1242/dev.00921 (2004).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. 40.

    Ohneda, K., Mirmira, R. G., Wang, J., Johnson, J. D. & German, M. S. The homeodomain of PDX-1 mediates multiple protein-protein interactions in the formation of a transcriptional activation complex on the insulin promoter. Mol. Cell. Biol. 20, 900–911, https://doi.org/10.1128/mcb.20.3.900-911.2000 (2000).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  41. 41.

    Bartoov-Shifman, R. et al. Activation of the insulin gene promoter through a direct effect of hepatocyte nuclear factor 4 alpha. J. Biol. Chem. 277, 25914–25919, https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M201582200 (2002).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. 42.

    Hui, J. H. L., Holland, P. W. H. & Ferrier, D. E. K. Do cnidarians have a ParaHox cluster? Analysis of synteny around a Nematostella homeobox gene cluster. Evol. Dev. 10, 725–730 (2008).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  43. 43.

    Olinski, R. P., Lundin, L.-G. & Hallböök, F. Conserved synteny between the Ciona genome and human paralogons identifies large duplication events in the molecular evolution of the insulin-relaxin gene family. Mol. Biol. Evol. 23, 10–22 (2006).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  44. 44.

    Hu, H., Bandyopadhyay, P. K., Olivera, B. M. & Yandell, M. Elucidation of the molecular envenomation strategy of the cone snail Conus geographus through transcriptome sequencing of its venom duct. BMC Genomics 13, 284, https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2164-13-284 (2012).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  45. 45.

    Collip, J. The demonstration of an insulin-like substance in the tissues of the clam (Mya arenaria). J. Biol. Chem. 55, 39 (1923).

    Google Scholar 

  46. 46.

    Smit, A. B. et al. Growth-controlling molluscan neurons produce the precursor of an insulin-related peptide. Nature 331, 535–538 (1988).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  47. 47.

    Hamano, K., Awaji, M. & Usuki, H. cDNA structure of an insulin-related peptide in the Pacific oyster and seasonal changes in the gene expression. J. Endocrinol. 187, 55–67, https://doi.org/10.1677/joe.1.06284 (2005).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. 48.

    Pieler, T. & Chen, Y. L. Forgotten and novel aspects in pancreas development. Biol. Cell 98, 79–88, https://doi.org/10.1042/Bc20050069 (2006).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. 49.

    Roszer, T. The invertebrate midintestinal gland (“hepatopancreas”) is an evolutionary forerunner in the integration of immunity and metabolism. Cell Tissue Res. 358, 685–695, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00441-014-1985-7 (2014).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. 50.

    Angelo, J. R., Guerrero-Zayas, M. I. & Tremblay, K. D. A fate map of the murine pancreas buds reveals a multipotent ventral foregut organ progenitor. Plos One 7, https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0040707 (2012).

  51. 51.

    Steinmetz, P. R. H., Aman, A., Kraus, J. E. M. & Technau, U. Gut-like ectodermal tissue in a sea anemone challenges germ layer homology. Nat. Ecol. Evol. 1, 1535–1542, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41559-017-0285-5 (2017).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  52. 52.

    Hashimshony, T., Feder, M., Levin, M., Hall, B. K. & Yanai, I. Spatiotemporal transcriptomics reveals the evolutionary history of the endoderm germ layer. Nature 519, 219–222, https://doi.org/10.1038/nature13996 (2015).

    ADS  CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. 53.

    Barrow, J., Hay, C. W., Ferguson, L. A., Docherty, H. M. & Docherty, K. Transcription factor cycling on the insulin promoter. FEBS Lett. 580, 711–715 (2006).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  54. 54.

    Ohneda, K., Ee, H. & German, M. Regulation of insulin gene transcription. Semin. Cell Dev. Biol. 11, 227–233 (2000).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  55. 55.

    Wardle, F. C. & Tan, H. A ChIP on the shoulder? Chromatin immunoprecipitation and validation strategies for ChIP antibodies. F1000Res 4, 235, https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.6719.1 (2015).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  56. 56.

    Xu, F. et al. High expression of new genes in trochophore enlightening the ontogeny and evolution of trochozoans. Sci. Rep. 6, 34664, https://doi.org/10.1038/srep34664 (2016).

    ADS  CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  57. 57.

    Katoh, K. & Standley, D. M. MAFFT multiple sequence alignment software version 7: improvements in performance and usability. Mol. Biol. Evol. 30, 772–780 (2013).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  58. 58.

    Capella-Gutierrez, S., Silla-Martinez, J. M. & Gabaldon, T. trimAl: a tool for automated alignment trimming in large-scale phylogenetic analyses. Bioinformatics 25, 1972–1973 (2009).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  59. 59.

    Stamatakis, A. RAxML version 8: a tool for phylogenetic analysis and post-analysis of large phylogenies. Bioinformatics 30, 1312–1313 (2014).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  60. 60.

    Golosova, O. et al. Unipro UGENE NGS pipelines and components for variant calling, RNA-seq and ChIP-seq data analyses. PeerJ 2, e644, https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.644 (2014).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  61. 61.

    Petersen, T. N., Brunak, S., von Heijne, G. & Nielsen, H. SignalP 4.0: discriminating signal peptides from transmembrane regions. Nat. Methods 8, 785–786, https://doi.org/10.1038/nmeth.1701 (2011).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  62. 62.

    Yang, Y. et al. Solution structure of proinsulin: connecting domain flexibility and prohormone processing. J. Biol. Chem. 285, 7847–7851, https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.C109.084921 (2010).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  63. 63.

    Waterhouse, A. M., Procter, J. B., Martin, D. M. A., Clamp, M. & Barton, G. J. Jalview Version 2-a multiple sequence alignment editor and analysis workbench. Bioinformatics 25, 1189–1191, https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btp033 (2009).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  64. 64.

    Ihaka, R. & Gentleman, R. R: A language for data analysis and graphics. J. Comput. Graph. Stat. 5, 299–314 (1996).

    Google Scholar 

  65. 65.

    Buenrostro, J. D., Wu, B., Chang, H. Y. & Greenleaf, W. J. In Current Protocols in Molecular Biology Vol. 109 ATAC-seq: A Method for Assaying Chromatin Accessibility Genome-Wide (ed Frederick M Ausubel) 21–29 (John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 2015).

  66. 66.

    Flynn, J. M. et al. RepeatModeler2 for automated genomic discovery of transposable element families. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA. 117, 9451–9457, https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1921046117 (2020).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  67. 67.

    Morgulis, A., Gertz, E. M., Schaffer, A. A. & Agarwala, R. A fast and symmetric DUST implementation to mask low-complexity DNA sequences. J. Comput. Biol. 13, 1028–1040, https://doi.org/10.1089/cmb.2006.13.1028 (2006).

    MathSciNet  CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  68. 68.

    Benson, G. Tandem repeats finder: a program to analyze DNA sequences. Nucleic Acids Res. 27, 573–580, https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/27.2.573 (1999).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  69. 69.

    van Heeringen, S. J. & Veenstra, G. J. GimmeMotifs: a de novo motif prediction pipeline for ChIP-sequencing experiments. Bioinformatics 27, 270–271, https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btq636 (2011).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  70. 70.

    Weirauch, M. T. et al. Determination and inference of eukaryotic transcription factor sequence specificity. Cell 158, 1431–1443, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2014.08.009 (2014).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  71. 71.

    Simon J., V. H. Vertebrate motif clusters v3.0. figshare, https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.1555851 (2015).

  72. 72.

    Pertea, M., Kim, D., Pertea, G. M., Leek, J. T. & Salzberg, S. L. Transcript-level expression analysis of RNA-seq experiments with HISAT, StringTie and Ballgown. Nat. Protoc. 11, 1650–1667 (2016).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  73. 73.

    Robinson, M. D., McCarthy, D. J. & Smyth, G. K. edgeR: a Bioconductor package for differential expression analysis of digital gene expression data. Bioinformatics 26, 139–140, https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btp616 (2010).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  74. 74.

    Paps, J., Xu, F., Zhang, G. & Holland, P. W. H. Reinforcing the egg-timer: Recruitment of novel Lophotrochozoa homeobox genes to early and late development in the Pacific oyster. Genome Biol. Evol. 7, 677–688, https://doi.org/10.1093/gbe/evv018 (2015).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  75. 75.

    Bao, Y., Xu, F. & Shimeld, S. Phylogenetics of lophotrochozoan bHLH genes and the evolution of lineage-specific gene duplicates. Genome Biol. Evol. 9, 869–886 (2017).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors thank Jordi Paps and Yuuri Yasuoka for discussions, Ruth Williams, Upeka Senanayake, Adam Hargreaves, Shan Quah, Ignacio Maeso, Thomas Dunwell and Qingfeng Yan for advice on ATAC-seq and cell culture, and Alan Todd for help with microscopy. The High-Throughput Genomics Group at the Wellcome Trust Centre for Human Genetics (Wellcome Trust grant 090532/Z/09/Z) performed RNA-seq. Gene expression analyses were performed using the supercomputer cluster of the High Performance Computing Center (HPCC) at the Institute of Oceanology, Chinese Academy of Sciences. F.X. acknowledges the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 41776152), Key Deployment Project of Centre for Ocean Mega-Research of Science, Chinese Academy of Science (COMS2019Q11) and China Scholarship Council (CSC) for financial support; P.W.H.H. acknowledges funding from the European Research Council under the European Union’s Seventh Framework Programme (FP7/2007-2013 ERC grant 268513), a Royal Society International Exchanges grant and the QR GCRF award to the University of Oxford.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

F.X. and P.W.H.H. conceived and designed the study. F.X. conducted experiments and data analysis. F.X., F.M., D.G. and T.S.-S. conducted ATAC-seq experiments and data analysis. X.L. and G.Z. contributed to oyster experiments and analysis. F.X. and P.W.H.H. wrote the paper. All authors approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Fei Xu.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Peer review information Nature Communications thanks Maria Ina Arnone and the other, anonymous, reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work. Peer reviewer reports are available.

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Source data

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Xu, F., Marlétaz, F., Gavriouchkina, D. et al. Evidence from oyster suggests an ancient role for Pdx in regulating insulin gene expression in animals. Nat Commun 12, 3117 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-021-23216-7

Download citation

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing