Abstract
Electrical manipulation of magnetization could be an essential function for energyefficient spintronics technology. A magnetic topological insulator, possessing a magnetically gapped surface state with spinpolarized electrons, not only exhibits exotic topological phases relevant to the quantum anomalous Hall state but also enables the electrical control of its magnetic state at the surface. Here, we demonstrate efficient currentinduced switching of the surface ferromagnetism in heterobilayers consisting of the topological insulator (Bi_{1x}Sb_{x})_{2}Te_{3} and the ferromagnetic insulator Cr_{2}Ge_{2}Te_{6}, where the proximityinduced ferromagnetic surface states play two roles: efficient chargetospin current conversion and emergence of large anomalous Hall effect. The sign reversal of the surface ferromagnetic states with current injection is clearly observed, accompanying the nearly full magnetization reversal in the adjacent insulating Cr_{2}Ge_{2}Te_{6} layer of an optimal thickness range. The present results may facilitate an electrical control of dissipationless topologicalcurrent circuits.
Similar content being viewed by others
Introduction
Spinpolarized surface electronic states of threedimensional topological insulators (TIs) offer novel physical properties, being potentially applicable to future lowpowerconsumption electronics/spintronics and topological quantum computation^{1}. One of the representative features is the emergence of anomalous Hall conductance in the gapped surface state when magnetization perpendicular to the surface is induced by the incorporation of magnetic elements or proximity coupling with a ferromagnetic (FM) layer on the TI^{2,3,4,5,6,7,8}. This magnetic TI exhibits exotic magnetic insulating phases, such as a quantum anomalous Hall (QAH) insulator and an axion insulator. In particular, the QAH state provides a research arena based on the nondissipative chiral edge conduction, whose direction is determined by the magnetization direction. By controlling the magnetization direction, a topological invariant of the Chern number C in the QAH conditions can correspondingly be controlled, as manifested by the switching of the conduction direction (C = 1 or −1) and on/off switching (C = 1 or 0) of the chiral edge channel^{4,5,6}.
Besides external magnetic fields, an electric current injection can also control the magnetization directions. Owing to the spinmomentum locking of the electrons at the TI surface state^{9,10}, the flow of electrons produces nonequilibrium spin accumulation, which exerts spin torques on a FM layer adjacent to the TI surface^{11,12}. The currentinduced switching of the perpendicular magnetization in the FM layer in conjunction with a TI has been demonstrated in a highly efficient manner with lower critical current densities than those in FMmetal/heavymetal heterostructures^{13,14,15,16,17,18,19}. Moreover, the spin accumulation may also enable the electrical manipulation of the TI surface ferromagnetism that originates from the FM proximity coupling at the FMlayer/TI interface. However, in the intensively studied FMmetal/TI systems, the current at the TI surface state is mostly shunted by the FMmetal layer. Hence, the replacement of the FM metal with a FM insulator (FMI) would be effective to control the magnetization with lower electric current^{20,21,22}, which is also required to observe the QAH states with nontrivial Chern numbers^{8}. It has been demonstrated that the magnetization in the FMI layer can be partly switched by current excitation in magnetically doped TI^{13,14} and FMI/TI heterostructures^{20}, but the switching ratio of the magnetization has been limited to <50%. Such a low ratio, which likely originates from the inhomogeneous nature of dopinginduced ferromagnetism and weak magnetic coupling at the interface of FMI/TI, respectively, results in the formation of multidomain states after each switching operation and causes difficulty in the control of the topological invariant. Therefore, it is expected that the choice of a suitable FMI with high crystallinity and strong interfacial coupling can achieve a high switching ratio.
Here, we demonstrate the nearly full magnetization switching in an alltelluridebased intrinsic FMI (Cr_{2}Ge_{2}Te_{6}; CGT)/TI heterostructure (Fig. 1a). The layered FMI compound of CGT^{23,24} has recently been found to provide strong proximity coupling with the TI surface state, as exemplified by the observation of large anomalous Hall effect (AHE) originating from a prominent Berry curvature near the exchange gap formed in the proximitycoupled surface state^{25} (Fig. 1b). Since the efficient spin transfer to the FMI layer requires strong couplings with wellordered interfaces between the TI surface state and the magnetic moments in the FMI layer^{26,27}, the CGT/TI heterostructures may be of great advantage for highly efficient switching. Through the optimization of the CGT thickness for the switching ratio and efficiency, the magnetization of the CGT layer can be almost fully switched by the inplane current injection on the TI layer as low as 2–4 A cm^{−1} in the CGT thickness range of 3–5 nm (corresponding to four to seven CGT monolayers). Furthermore, high switching current efficiencies irrespective of the Fermi level (E_{F}) indicate that the spin torques are dominantly generated from the TI surface state rather than its bulk state. Such a FMI/TI heterostructure is highly suitable for the currentinduced control of the surface ferromagnetism of TI.
Results
Heterostructure and device characterization
We grew CGT/(Bi_{1x}Sb_{x})_{2}Te_{3} (CGT/BST) bilayer films (Fig. 1a) on InP(111) substrates by molecular beam epitaxy (MBE; see “Methods” section). To examine the E_{F} position dependence, the Bi/Sb ratio (x) was systematically controlled in the BST layer. The previous study^{25} on the CGT/BST heterostructure, which was prepared in the same way as in the present study, has proven the high crystal quality and wellordered, sharp interfaces due to van der Waals bonding, as well as negligible atomic interdiffusion by cooperatively using xray diffraction, depthsensitive xray/neutron reflectometry, and crosssectional scanning transmission electron microscopy/energydispersive xray spectroscopy (Supplementary Note 1). The magnetization of a MBEgrown CGT (12 nm)/BST (6 nm) structure (the Curie temperature: T_{C} ~ 80 K) at a temperature of T = 2 K (Fig. 1c) shows the hysteresis loop with the outofplane easy axis, which is nearly identical with the property of the MBEgrown CGT single layer itself^{24}. For the electrical transport measurements and magnetization switching characterizations, we fabricated Hall bars with 10 μm in width (Fig. 1d). Figure 1e shows the T dependence of sheet resistance R_{xx} for the CGT singlelayer (12 nm), BST (x = 0.5, 6 nm) singlelayer, and CGT (12 nm)/BST (x = 0.5, 6 nm) bilayer films. Whereas the CGT singlelayer film exhibits a highly insulating behavior (>1 MΩ <50 K), the resistance of the CGT/BST bilayer film is comparable to that of the BST singlelayer film. The electrical conductivity in the TI layer depends on the E_{F}, yet the dominant conduction channel is still in the TI layer for all the heterostructures (Supplementary Fig. 2).
Proximityinduced anomalous Hall effect
We first discuss the CGT layer thickness (t_{CGT}) dependence of the AHE for six samples of the CGT/BST(x = 0.5, 6 nm) bilayers. This composition x = 0.5 is the optimum value in the bilayer system for the observation of the largest AHE as discussed later. We note that the optimum x value is different from the chargeneutrality point value (x ~ 0.8) in BST singlelayer films^{3,4,5,8} to suppress a possible charge transfer at the CGT/BST interface. Figure 2a shows the Hall resistance R_{yx} of typical four samples, exhibiting comparable AHE responses. In addition, the coercive field of the hysteresis loops is consistent with the magnetization hysteresis curve of the CGT layer (t_{CGT} = 12 nm; Fig. 1c). The value of remnant anomalous Hall resistance R_{yx}^{AH} at zero magnetic field (~250 Ω) is nearly constant irrespective of t_{CGT} (2.9 ≤ t_{CGT} ≤ 12 nm), reflecting that the Berry curvature generated at the magnetically gapped TI surface state.
Currentinduced magnetization switching
In Fig. 2b, we present the currentinduced magnetization switching of the CGT (2.9 nm)/BST (x = 0.5, 6 nm) bilayer. To perform the perpendicular magnetization switching^{28,29,30}, 100μs duration current pulses (J_{x}) were injected under inplane magnetic fields (μ_{0}H_{x} = ±0.1 T) much smaller than the anisotropy fields (H_{K} ~ 0.9 T; see Supplementary Note 2). After every current pulse injection, R_{yx} was measured with a much smaller probe current of J_{x} = 10 μA to elucidate the magnetization direction of the CGT layer and the proximityinduced surface ferromagnetism via Hall measurement. As shown in Fig. 2b, when the amplitude of the injection current pulse exceeds the switching threshold current J_{x}^{sw} ~ 2.0 mA, the sign of the Hall resistance is reversed. As expected from the antidampinglike spin–orbit torque switching^{28,29,30}, the switching polarity is reversed when we reverse the direction of the inplane magnetic field (H_{x} (blue curve) → −H_{x} (red curve)). The change of Hall resistance R_{yx}^{sw} = R_{yx}(J_{x} → +0, H_{x} < 0) − R_{yx}(J_{x} → −0, H_{x} < 0)/2 = 200 Ω is comparable to the remnant Hall resistance R_{yx}^{AH} = 228 Ω, in which the ratio R_{yx}^{sw}/R_{yx}^{AH} ~ 0.88 corresponds to the reversed magnetization ratio in the CGT. This large value means the realization of the nearly full magnetization switching, resulting in the switching of the FM surface states and the topological spin structures in the surface state (Fig. 1b).
Cr_{2}Ge_{2}Te_{6} thickness dependence of the magnetization switching
Having established the currentinduced magnetization switching, we next examine the t_{CGT} dependence of J_{x}^{sw} to evaluate the switching ratio and efficiency. As shown in Fig. 2c, the J_{x}^{sw} increases with increasing t_{CGT}, while the switching volume fraction measured by R_{yx}^{sw}/R_{yx}^{AH} decreases. A linear increase of J_{x}^{sw} in Fig. 2d saturates at 6 < t_{CGT} < 12 nm. Furthermore, R_{yx}^{sw}/R_{yx}^{AH} drastically decreases at 6 < t_{CGT} < 12 nm. The t_{CGT}linear relation for t_{CGT} < 6 nm is attributed to that the spin torques required for the switching linearly increase with the spontaneous magnetization per sample area, M_{s}t_{CGT}. On the other hand, for t_{CGT} = 8 and 12 nm, the large M_{s}t_{CGT} requires a large J_{x}^{sw}, resulting in a thermal instability of magnetization due to the Joule heating which perhaps not only assists the switching, but also reduces R_{yx}^{sw}/R_{yx}^{AH} due to the multidomain formation (see Supplementary Note 4 for the estimation of heating effect).
To quantitatively compare the t_{CGT}dependent switching behavior, we define a coefficient parameter ξ = 2eμ_{0}M_{s}H_{c}t_{CGT}/(ħj_{x}^{sw}) (refs. ^{12}^{,}^{30}). Here e is the elementary charge, ħ is the reduced Planck’s constant, μ_{0}H_{c} is the coercive field of the CGT layer, and j_{x}^{sw} = J_{x}^{sw}/W (W = 10 μm: the width of the Hall bars) is the sheet switching current density. This coefficient describes how efficiently the surface spin accumulation is absorbed in the FMI layer via the chargetospin current conversion (J_{s} = ξ j_{x}), where the resulting antidampinglike spin–orbit torque magnitude (in a unit moment) is described by τ_{AD} = ħJ_{s}/(2eM_{s}t_{CGT}). Since the switching is likely driven by currentinduced domain nucleation and subsequent domain wall motion processes^{30} due to the largescale Hall bar (Fig. 1d) compared with the magnetic domain size (see Supplementary Fig. 6 for the observed magnetic domain structure), the spin–orbit torque acts as the domain wall depinning field, which is assigned to the coercive field of the CGT layer (μ_{0}H_{c}) at the switching threshold current injection^{30}. As shown in Fig. 2e, we observe ξ for t_{CGT} < 6 nm takes a roughly constant value of ξ ~ 1.0 nm^{−1}, being consistent with the linear J_{x}^{sw}–t_{CGT} relation shown in Fig. 2d. Furthermore, this value obtained without any correction of current distribution in the TI layer owing to the insulating FM layer is comparable to that derived in the previous spin–torque FM resonance experiment on the FMmetal layer in proximity to the TI BST^{12}. Incidentally, to more quantitatively estimate the spincharge conversion efficiency, we tried to utilize the prevailing method to use the second harmonic Hall measurement^{31,32}. The analysis based on it, however, gave an unphysically large efficiency value, i.e., ~1000 nm^{−1}. Such a large nonlinear Hall signal is perhaps due to a magnon scattering of the spinmomentumlocked surface Dirac electrons of TI^{14} (see Supplementary Note 6 for details).
Fermilevel position dependence of the switching efficiency
We turn to E_{F} position dependence of magnetization switching for the evaluation of the surface state contribution. Figure 3a shows the AHE in CGT (3.5 nm)/BST (6 nm) having different x with the fixed thicknesses of each layer. Judging from the sign of the ordinary Hall term at high magnetic fields, the dominant carrier type is systematically controlled with increasing x from electron type for x = 0, 0.3, and 0.5 to hole type for x = 0.7 and 1. At the x = 0.5, R_{yx}^{AH} is maximized, indicating that E_{F} is closest to the magnetic gap where the Berry curvature contribution is the largest^{2,3}. In addition, the sign of AHE is reversed, while reducing its magnitude, from positive to negative for 0.5 < x < 0.7, reflecting the sign change of the Berry curvature. Such a sign change has been observed also in magnetically doped TI heterostructures^{33}, where an additional anomalous Hall conductivity with the opposite sign is generated from Rashbasplit bulk valence bands due to the broken inversion symmetry by the heterostructure. Hence, both the surface and bulk states are likely to contribute to the electrical conduction in ptype BST (x = 0.7 and 1). We thus observed several characteristic behaviors in the currentinduced magnetization switching in Fig. 3b. First, its switching polarity change (R_{yx} versus J_{x}) between x = 0.5 and 0.7 coincides with that of AHE (R_{yx} versus H_{z}), indicating the same spin–torque directions irrespective of the carrier types. Second, R_{yx}^{sw}/R_{yx}^{AH} is nearly constant against the variation of x. Third, J_{x}^{sw}, on the other hand, varies with x, where the minimum 2 mA is observed for x = 0.5, while both x = 0 and 1 require the larger J_{x}^{sw} of 5 mA, implying the switching efficiency depends on the E_{F}.
To clarify the relationship between the switching efficiency and the E_{F} position, we compare the x dependence of ξ and R_{yx}^{AH} in Fig. 3c. Both are enhanced at x = 0.5 in which the bulk conduction is mostly suppressed with E_{F} being close to the magnetic gap of the TI surface state. The large R_{yx}^{AH} (solid blue circles) comes from the prominent Berry curvature generated around the gap. Moreover, the broad peak of ξ x = 0.5 implies that the spinpolarized surface state plays a dominant role in the magnetization switching because the bulk contribution present at x = 0 and 1 does not increase ξ. Thus, E_{F} tuning is advantageous for improving the switching efficiency, as well as for maximizing the AHE while the almost full magnetization switching is accomplished for all the samples (Fig. 3b). Note that despite the surface state is magnetically gapped by the proximity coupling with the FMI layer, suppression of the chargetospin current conversion efficiency in the nearly chargeneutral samples is not observed, possibly due to still unprecise tuning of the Fermi level into the middle of the exchange gap or to the spatially inhomogeneous gap opening.
Discussions
Finally, we argue that these magnetization switching features are consistent with currentinduced dynamics of the spinmomentumlocked TI surface state as the dominant source of the spin torques^{11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19}. First, possibilities for the source of the spin torques other than the topological surface states may include the spin Hall effect from the bulk bands^{34} and the inversion symmetry breaking of the heterointerface, where a vertical electric field at the interface can induce Rashba spin splitting in the bulk states^{35}. However, these scenarios cannot account for the present observation that the efficiency is increased when the E_{F} is within the TI bulk gap rather than in the bulk states. Second, the accumulated spin direction is irrespective of the carrier types. The Fermi circle with the opposite spin helicities for ntype and ptype (Fig. 3c) suggests that the direction of spins would be opposite for the carrier types. However, in consideration of the Fermi surface response to the electric current or field, the accumulated spin directions are the same as elucidated in the following. When an electric field (+E_{x}) is applied, the shift of the Fermi circle has the same direction irrespective of the carrier type: \(k_x \to k_x  \frac{{eE_x\tau }}{\hbar } = k_x  \delta k\). Then, as shown in Fig. 3e, if E_{F} > E_{DP} = 0, the Fermi circle shift increases the population of electrons for the −k_{x} branch, while reducing that for the +k_{x} branch. On the other hand, if E_{F} < E_{DP}, the Fermi circle shift reduces the population of electrons for the −k_{x} branch, while increasing that for the +k_{x} branch (Fig. 3f). Hence, the increased spin populations for the ntype and ptype have the same direction \({\hat{\mathbf{\sigma }}} = + {\hat{\mathbf{y}}}\) under +E_{x}. Since the antidamping effective field, which is given by \({\hat{\mathbf{\sigma }}} \times {\hat{\mathbf{m}}}\), does not depend on the momentum but the spin direction, the spin–orbit torque direction is not changed by the carrier types. Third, the magnetization switching direction itself is consistent with the spinmomentumlocked surface state of BST by using a macrospin model^{29}: the effective field originating from antidamping torques \({\mathbf{\tau }}_{{\mathrm{AD}}} = \tau _{{\mathrm{AD}}}\left( {{\hat{\mathbf{m}}} \times \left( {{\hat{\mathbf{\sigma }}} \times {\hat{\mathbf{m}}}} \right)} \right)\), where τ_{AD} > 0, is described by \({\mathbf{H}}_{{\mathrm{AD}}} = (\tau _{{\mathrm{AD}}}/\mu _0){\hat{\mathbf{\sigma }}} \times {\hat{\mathbf{m}}}\). Suppose the magnetic moment is \({\hat{\mathbf{m}}} = + {\hat{\mathbf{z}}}\), the effective field \({\mathbf{H}}_{{\mathrm{AD}}} + {\hat{\mathbf{x}}}\) under the current pulse of j_{x} > 0 (i.e., \({\hat{\mathbf{\sigma }}} = + {\hat{\mathbf{y}}}\) due to the spinmomentum locking nature of BST), which rotates the magnetization via magnetic damping as shown in Fig. 1a. When the magnetic moment is slightly tilted to \(+ {\hat{\mathbf{x}}}\) (\( {\hat{\mathbf{x}}}\)) by an inplane magnetic field, the \({\hat{\mathbf{m}}} =  {\hat{\mathbf{z}}}\) (\(+ {\hat{\mathbf{z}}}\)) state is favored under the current pulse injection, which well describes the observed behaviors shown in Fig. 2b. Note that once the reversed magnetic domains are nucleated by the above macrospin model mechanism, the domains may be expanded toward the single domain state more efficiently than the macrospin rotation^{29,30}.
In conclusion, by the current excitation at the TI surface state, we have successfully demonstrated the nearly full switching of the FM surface states in the TI layer proximitycoupled to the insulating CGT. The systematic CGT thickness t_{CGT} dependence of the switching current reveals that the t_{CGT} should be <6 nm to realize the full switching. Our results indicate the compatibility of the large proximityinduced AHE and the efficient magnetization switching, paving a way to electrically manipulate topological quantum states. For instance, thick FMI/TI/thin FMI sandwich structures^{8,25} with different switching currents (Fig. 2d) for the top and bottom TI surfaces would allow selective controls of the magnetic layers, namely electrical switching between the QAH insulator (parallel magnetization) and axion insulator (antiparallel magnetization) states^{5,6}. Whereas such topological states are surface insulating and would not directly contribute to the spin–torque generation, an additional electrostatic gating capability to control the Fermi level^{36} or a currentdriven breakdown of the QAH state during a current pulse injection^{37,38,39} could retrieve the spinpolarized surface transport. This allows linking the spintronic functionalities to the topological quantum states, opening a new avenue to unprecedented control of dissipationless topological current devices.
Methods
Film growth and characterization
The CGT (top)/BST (bottom) films were grown by MBE on semiinsulating InP substrates using standard Knudsen cells in a MBE chamber under a vacuum condition (~1 × 10^{−7} Pa). The growth temperatures for the CGT layers and the BST layers were 180 °C and 200 °C, respectively^{24,25}. Taking out the films from the MBE chamber, the AlO_{x} capping layer (~5 nm) was immediately deposited by atomic layer deposition at room temperature. The crystal structures and thicknesses of the respective layers were confirmed by xray diffraction and reflectivity measurements, respectively^{25}.
Device fabrication
The films were patterned into Hall bars with 10 μm in width and 30 μm in length by using photolithography and chemical etching, with H_{2}O_{2}–H_{3}PO_{4}–H_{2}O and HCl–H_{2}O mixtures. The electrodes were made of Ti (5 nm)/Au (45 nm) deposited by electron beam evaporation.
Electrical transport measurements
The electrical transport measurements of the Hall bars were performed in a Quantum Design PPMS (2 K, 9 T). The current value for the resistivity and Hall effect measurements was 10 μA.
Magnetization switching measurements
The pulse current with varying pulse amplitudes between ±8 mA was injected into the Hall bar by using a current source (Keithley Model 6221). After the injection, the Hall resistance was subsequently measured with a voltmeter (Keithley Model 2182A) under a low probe current of 10 μA.
Data availability
All relevant data within this paper are available from the authors upon reasonable request. Source data are provided with this paper.
References
Hasan, M. Z. & Kane, C. L. Colloquium: topological insulators. Rev. Mod. Phys. 82, 3045 (2010).
Tokura, Y., Yasuda, K. & Tsukazaki, A. Magnetic topological insulators. Nat. Rev. Phys. 1, 126–143 (2019).
Chang, C.Z. et al. Experimental observation of the quantum anomalous Hall effect in a magnetic topological insulator. Science 340, 167–170 (2013).
Kou, X. et al. Metaltoinsulator switching in quantum anomalous Hall states. Nat. Commun. 6, 8474 (2015).
Mogi, M. et al. A magnetic heterostructure of topological insulators as a candidate for an axion insulator. Nat. Mater. 16, 516–521 (2017).
Liu, C. et al. Robust axion insulator and Chern insulator phases in a twodimensional antiferromagnetic topological insulator. Nat. Mater. 19, 522–527 (2020).
Deng, Y. et al. Quantum anomalous Hall effect in intrinsic magnetic topological insulator MnBi_{2}Te_{4}. Science 367, 895–900 (2020).
Watanabe, R. et al. Quantum anomalous Hall effect driven by magnetic proximity coupling in alltelluride based heterostructure. Appl. Phys. Lett. 115, 182401 (2019).
Burkov, A. A. & Hawthorn D. G. Spin and charge transport on the surface of a topological insulator. Phys. Rev. Lett. 105, 066802 (2010).
Pesin, D. & MacDonald, A. H. Spintronics and pseudospintronics in graphene and topological insulators. Nat. Mater. 11, 409–416 (2012).
Mellnik, A. R. et al. Spintransfer torque generated by a topological insulator. Nature 511, 449–451 (2014).
Kondou, K. et al. Fermileveldependent chargetospin current conversion by Dirac surface states of topological insulators. Nat. Phys. 12, 1027–1031 (2016).
Fan, Y. et al. Magnetization switching through giant spinorbit torque in a magnetically doped topological insulator heterostructure. Nat. Mater. 13, 699–704 (2014).
Yasuda, K. et al. Currentnonlinear Hall effect and spinorbit torque magnetization switching in a magnetic topological insulator. Phys. Rev. Lett. 119, 137204 (2017).
Han, J. et al. Roomtemperature spinorbit torque switching induced by a topological insulator. Phys. Rev. Lett. 119, 077702 (2017).
Wang, Y. et al. Room temperature magnetization switching in topological insulatorferromagnet heterostructures by spinorbit torques. Nat. Commun. 8, 1364 (2017).
Dc, M. et al. Roomtemperature high spin–orbit torque due to quantum confinement in sputtered Bi_{x}Se_{(1–x)} films. Nat. Mater. 17, 800–807 (2018).
Khang, N. H., Khang, D., Ueda, Y. & Hai, P. M. A conductive topological insulator with large spin Hall effect for ultralow power spinorbit torque switching. Nat. Mater. 17, 808–813 (2018).
Wu, H. et al. Roomtemperature spinorbit torque from topological surface states. Phys. Rev. Lett. 123, 207205 (2019).
Li, P. et al. Magnetization switching using topological surface states. Sci. Adv. 5, eaaw3415 (2019).
Avci, C. O. et al. Currentinduced switching in a magnetic insulator. Nat. Mater. 16, 309–314 (2017).
Shao, Q. et al. Role of dimensional crossover on spinorbit torque efficiency in magnetic insulator thin films. Nat. Commun. 9, 3612 (2018).
Gong, C. et al. Discovery of intrinsic ferromagnetism in twodimensional van der Waals crystals. Nature 546, 265–269 (2017).
Mogi, M. et al. Ferromagnetic insulator Cr_{2}Ge_{2}Te_{6} thin films with perpendicular remanence. APL Mater. 6, 091104 (2018).
Mogi, M. et al. Large anomalous Hall effect in topological insulators with proximitized ferromagnetic insulators. Phys. Rev. Lett. 123, 016804 (2019).
Zhang, W., Han, W., Jiang, X., Yang, S.H. & Parkin, S. S. P. Role of transparency of platinumferromagnet interfaces in determining the intrinsic magnitude of the spin Hall effect. Nat. Phys. 11, 496–502 (2015).
Chen, W., Sigrist, M., Sinova, J. & Manske, D. Minimal model of spintransfer torque and spin pumping caused by the spin Hall effect. Phys. Rev. Lett. 115, 217203 (2015).
Miron, I. M. et al. Perpendicular switching of a single ferromagnetic layer induced by inplane current injection. Nature 476, 189–193 (2011).
Liu, L., Lee, O. J., Gudmundsen, T. J., Ralph, D. C. & Buhrman, R. A. Currentinduced switching of perpendicularly magnetized magnetic layers using spin torque from the spin Hall effect. Phys. Rev. Lett. 109, 096602 (2012).
Lee, Q. J. et al. Central role of domain wall depinning for perpendicular magnetization switching driven by spin torque from the spin Hall effect. Phys. Rev. B 89, 024418 (2014).
Kim, J. et al. Layer thickness dependence of the currentinduced effective field vector in TaCoFeBMgO. Nat. Mater. 12, 240–245 (2013).
Garello, K. et al. Symmetry and magnitude of spinorbit torques in ferromagnetic heterostructures. Nat. Nanotech. 8, 587–593 (2013).
Yasuda, K. et al. Geometric Hall effects in topological insulator heterostructures. Nat. Phys. 12, 555–559 (2016).
Liu, Y. et al. Direct visualization of currentinduced spin accumulation in topological insulators. Nat. Commun. 9, 2492 (2018).
Yang, F. et al. Switching of chargecurrentinduced spin polarization in the topological insulator BiSbTeSe_{2}. Phys. Rev. B 94, 075304 (2016).
Chiba, T. & Komine, T. Voltagedriven magnetization switching via Dirac magnetic anisotropy and spinorbit torque in topologicalinsulatorbased magnetic heterostructures. Phys. Rev. Appl. 14, 034031 (2020).
Fox, E. J. et al. Partpermillion quantization and currentinduced breakdown of the quantum anomalous Hall effect. Phys. Rev. B 98, 075145 (2018).
Kawamura, M. et al. Currentdriven instability of the quantum anomalous Hall effect in ferromagnetic topological insulators. Phys. Rev. Lett. 119, 016803 (2017).
Kawamura, M. et al. Current scaling of the topological quantum phase transition between a quantum anomalous Hall insulator and a trivial insulator. Phys. Rev. B 102, 041301(R) (2020).
Acknowledgements
This research project was partly supported by JSPS/MEXT GrantinAid for Scientific Research (Nos. 15H05853, 15H05867, 17J03179, 18H04229, and 18H01155) and JST CREST (No. JPMJCR16F1).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
M.M. and K.Y. planned the experiments. M.M. and R.F. fabricated the samples with the help of R.Y., A.T., M. Kawamura, K.S.T., and M. Kawasaki. M.M. and R.F. performed the transport and magnetization switching measurements, and analysed the data with the help of K.Y. and R.Y. K.Y. performed the magnetic force microscopy measurements. M.M., K.Y., R.F., N.O., A.T., and Y.T. discussed the results. M.M., A.T., and Y.T. wrote the manuscript with inputs from all the other authors. Y.T. and M. Kawasaki conceived and supervised the project.
Corresponding authors
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Peer review information Nature Communications thanks Can Onur Avci, Yabin Fan and the other, anonymous, reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work. Peer reviewer reports are available.
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary information
Source data
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Mogi, M., Yasuda, K., Fujimura, R. et al. Currentinduced switching of proximityinduced ferromagnetic surface states in a topological insulator. Nat Commun 12, 1404 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467021216729
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467021216729
This article is cited by

Electrical switching of the edge current chirality in quantum anomalous Hall insulators
Nature Materials (2024)

Visualizing thicknessdependent magnetic textures in fewlayer Cr2Ge2Te6
Communications Materials (2024)

Investigation of the mechanism of the anomalous Hall effects in Cr2Te3/(BiSb)2(TeSe)3 heterostructure
Nano Convergence (2023)

Magnetotransport and ARPES studies of the topological insulators Sb2Te3 and Bi2Te3 grown by MOCVD on largearea Si substrates
Scientific Reports (2022)

Van der Waals heterostructures for spintronics and optospintronics
Nature Nanotechnology (2021)
Comments
By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.