Mesenchymal stem cell-derived interleukin-28 drives the selection of apoptosis resistant bone metastatic prostate cancer

McGuire, Jeremy J.; Frieling, Jeremy S.; Lo, Chen Hao; Li, Tao; Muhammad, Ayaz; Lawrence, Harshani R.; Lawrence, Nicholas J.; Cook, Leah M.; Lynch, Conor C.

doi:10.1038/s41467-021-20962-6

Download PDF

Article
Open access
Published: 01 February 2021

Mesenchymal stem cell-derived interleukin-28 drives the selection of apoptosis resistant bone metastatic prostate cancer

Nature Communications volume 12, Article number: 723 (2021) Cite this article

6837 Accesses
30 Citations
19 Altmetric
Metrics details

Subjects

Abstract

Bone metastatic prostate cancer (PCa) promotes mesenchymal stem cell (MSC) recruitment and their differentiation into osteoblasts. However, the effects of bone-marrow derived MSCs on PCa cells are less explored. Here, we report MSC-derived interleukin-28 (IL-28) triggers prostate cancer cell apoptosis via IL-28 receptor alpha (IL-28Rα)-STAT1 signaling. However, chronic exposure to MSCs drives the selection of prostate cancer cells that are resistant to IL-28-induced apoptosis and therapeutics such as docetaxel. Further, MSC-selected/IL-28-resistant prostate cancer cells grow at accelerated rates in bone. Acquired resistance to apoptosis is PCa cell intrinsic, and is associated with a shift in IL-28Rα signaling via STAT1 to STAT3. Notably, STAT3 ablation or inhibition impairs MSC-selected prostate cancer cell growth and survival. Thus, bone marrow MSCs drive the emergence of therapy-resistant bone metastatic prostate cancer yet this can be disabled by targeting STAT3.

Betaglycan drives the mesenchymal stromal cell osteogenic program and prostate cancer-induced osteogenesis

Article 13 August 2019

GDF15 promotes prostate cancer bone metastasis and colonization through osteoblastic CCL2 and RANKL activation

Article Open access 20 January 2022

CD117/c-kit defines a prostate CSC-like subpopulation driving progression and TKI resistance

Article Open access 14 January 2021

Introduction

Recurrent metastatic prostate cancer (PCa) typically manifests in the skeleton where it can rapidly become resistant to standard treatments, including androgen deprivation therapies (ADTs) and chemotherapies^1,2,3. Further, metastatic PCa disrupts bone homeostasis, provoking both bone destruction and abnormal bone formation, which significantly compromises the patient’s quality of life. We and others have reasoned that defining how prostate cancer cells establish and grow in the bone microenvironment may reveal new therapeutic targets for treatment^3,4,5. This process is complex, where extravasation of PCa cells into bone results in their exposure to several cell types, including mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs)⁶, and metastatic cancer cells are known to localize in MSC-rich vascular and osteogenic niches^7,8. Notably, PCa cells can promote MSC differentiation into bone forming osteoblasts⁹, yet little is known as to how MSCs may affect the maintenance, progression and resistance of bone metastatic prostate cancer.

MSCs can be both pro- and anti-tumorigenic depending on the stage of cancer progression and tissue context^10,11. For example, MSCs have been shown to trigger multiple myeloma cell apoptosis via secretion of Fas Ligand (FasL)¹². However, most studies have shown that MSCs contribute to cancer progression. In particular, MSCs recruited to the breast cancer microenvironment secrete chemokine ligand 5 (CCL5) that promotes cancer cell invasion and metastasis¹³. Further, in colorectal cancer MSC-derived neuroregulin 1 (NRG1) activates HER2/3 and AKT signaling to promote cancer cell survival, and MSC-derived IL-6 promotes the progression of hepatocellular carcinoma via activation of STAT3^14,15. The effects MSCs have on tumorigenesis can also be dynamic, where for example, they impair progression during the initial stages of hepatocarcinoma but support later stages of the disease¹⁶. The opposing effects of MSCs on tumor progression may in part be explained by the tissue source. Specifically, MSCs can be derived from several sources—bone marrow, umbilical cord blood, peripheral blood, dental pulp, and adipose tissue—and MSCs from each tissue source differ in their capacity to either promote or inhibit cancer growth¹⁷.

Here, we report that bone-marrow derived MSCs produce IL-28 and that this provokes rapid apoptosis of bone metastatic prostate cancer cells via IL-28Rα-STAT1 signaling, which has known roles in apoptosis, and in anti-viral and immune responses¹⁸. However, we found that chronic exposure to MSCs leads to the selection of PCa populations that display a shift to IL-28Rα-STAT3 signaling and that are resistant to IL-28 induced apoptosis, and to conventional chemotherapies such as etoposide and docetaxel. Notably, STAT3 is generally considered to be pro-tumorigenic^19,20 and is hyperactivated in bone metastatic prostate cancer^21,22. In accord with these findings, treatment of MSC-selected PCa cells with a selective small molecule inhibitor of STAT3, S3I-201, impaired their growth and survival ex vivo and in vivo. Thus, the IL-28Rα-STAT3 signaling circuit represents an attractive and therapeutically tractable vulnerability for bone metastatic prostate cancer.

Results

MSCs have dynamic effects on prostate cancer cell growth

Human and mouse bone metastatic prostate cancer specimens were initially assessed for MSC content by immunohistochemistry (IHC). As predicted^23,24,25, there were abundant numbers of α-SMA positive MSCs in both human and mouse bone metastatic PCa (Fig. 1a). These findings were confirmed using additional markers for human (CD90) and mouse (nestin) MSCs (Supplementary Fig. 1)^25,26,27. To assess the possible effects of MSCs on prostate cancer cells, we isolated mouse bone MSCs (CD29⁺SCA1⁺CD45^Neg) and confirmed their stemness properties by performing osteoblastic, adipogenic, and chondrogenic differentiation assays (Supplementary Fig. 2). Using a modified Boyden chamber assay, we observed that MSCs are highly chemotactic to prostate cancer cell line-derived conditioned media compared to serum free control (Fig. 1b). To assess the potential effects of MSCs on prostate cancer cell fate, the rodent prostate cancer cell line PAIII was directly co-cultured with mouse MSCs^28,29. Notably, MSCs significantly inhibited prostate cancer cell growth even down to 1:10 ratios of MSC to PAIII cells (Fig. 1c). Further, a dose-dependent inhibition of prostate cancer cell growth was evident when they were cultured with MSC conditioned media (CM); thus, a soluble MSC-derived factor suppresses prostate cancer cell growth (Fig. 1d). A significant rounding of PCa cells combined with detachment was noted within 6 h of culture with CM, suggesting that the MSCs triggered PCa cell apoptosis. Consistent with this, high levels of cleaved caspase-3 are manifest in MSC CM-treated PCa cells compared to controls within 6 h (Fig. 1e). This effect was not limited to PAIII PCa cells or to mouse MSC, as both mouse and human MSC conditioned medium impaired the growth of mouse Myc-CAP and human RWPE and DU145 prostate cancer cells (Fig. 1f). By contrast, culture in MSC CM increased the growth rates of V-CAP, 22RV1, LNCaP, and the LNCaP derived C4-2B prostate cancer cell lines compared to controls, underscoring the complexity of MSC effects on prostate cancer cell behavior (Fig. 1f). Of note, the negative effects on prostate cancer cell growth were MSC specific, as conditioned medium derived from osteoblasts failed to affect PCa cell growth (Fig. 1g). Finally, MSC CM also did not affect the growth of normal prostate epithelial cells (PREC; Fig. 1h).

**Fig. 1: Bone marrow-derived MSC effects on prostate cancer cells.**

MSCs suppress the growth of bone metastatic prostate cancer in vivo

To examine the effects of MSCs on prostate cancer progression in bone, immunocompromised animals were intratibially injected with luciferase-expressing PAIII PCa cell (2 × 10⁴; n = 8) in the presence or absence of 1:1 ratio of mouse MSCs (2 × 10⁴; n = 8) to reflect our in vitro observations. A separate cohort of mice received MSCs alone (2 × 10⁴; n = 7). Contralateral limbs in each animal received sham injections that served as an internal baseline control. We have previously shown that the PAIII PCa model generates rapid mixed osteolytic/osteogenic responses over the course of ~15 days prior to breaching the cortical bone^28,30,31. Using bioluminescence as a correlate of tumor growth over time, we noted that, similar to effects observed in vitro, PAIIII PCa growth was significantly suppressed by MSCs versus PAIII-alone cohort up to day 11 post-transplant (Fig. 2a). However, between day 11 and 14 we observed that the growth of the PAIII cancer cells co-injected with the MSCs rapidly accelerated (a 1260% increase in RLU from day 11–14) compared to the PAIII alone cohort (166% increase in RLU over the same time period) rendering the differences in tumor burden insignificant by day 14 (Fig. 2b, c). Analysis of proliferative (pHistone-H3) and apoptotic (cleaved caspase-3) indices confirmed increased proliferation and decreased apoptosis in the PAIII + MSC cohort with no statistical differences noted at the time of clinical endpoint compared to the PAIII-alone cohort (Fig. 2d, e). Analysis of MSC markers also demonstrated the persistence of the MSCs over time in the PAIII + MSC cohort (Fig. 2f).

**Fig. 2: MSCs initially suppress prostate cancer growth in the bone microenvironment.**

X-ray analyses of cancer-associated bone disease revealed, as expected, significant areas of tumor-induced osteolysis in PAIII bearing tibia compared to sham controls^28,30. However, quite strikingly, osteolysis was not evident in the PAIII + MSC cohort (Fig. 2g). Consistent with this observation, there were significantly higher numbers of TRAcP-positive mature multinucleated osteoclasts at the tumor-bone interface in the PAIII cohort compared to the PAIII + MSC, MSC or sham cohorts (Fig. 2h). Conversely, histomorphometry analysis demonstrated significantly higher levels of bone volume in the PAIII + MSC group compared to the PAIII cohort, which likely reflects increased MSC differentiation into osteoblasts (Fig. 2i).

Chronic MSC exposure selects for apoptosis resistant prostate cancer

In vitro, we observed some sensitive PCa cells treated with MSC CM persisted even after 24 h of exposure to CM and were able to form colonies. To assess if MSCs promote the selection of apoptosis resistant subpopulations, we exposed parental PAIII PCa cells (F0) to MSC CM for 72 h and allowed the surviving clones to grow out (F1). These cells underwent a consecutive round of MSC CM selection to yield a second MSC CM-educated population (F2). Cell growth analysis showed step-wise progressive enrichment of cancer cells resistant to growth inhibition by MSCs, F0 < F1 < F2 (Fig. 3a). Further, in direct co-culture experiments, with MSCs and cancer cells seeded at varying ratios, we observed an inhibitory effect on F0 parental cells but a proliferative effect on F2 MSC-selected cell lines (Fig. 3b). Consistent with this phenotype, immunofluorescence assays for cleaved caspase-3 demonstrated that apoptotic indices of F2 exposed to MSC CM were significantly lower than that of F0 cells (Fig. 3c). This effect was not limited to the PAIII PCa cells as chronic exposure to MSCs also selects for apoptosis resistant DU145 cells (Fig. 3d). We noted that both the F2 PAIII and F2 DU145 were also significantly more resistant to etoposide (ETX) induced apoptosis (Fig. 3c, e). To test if apoptosis resistance was solely due to MSC-derived factors or was more generalizable, we also examined the sensitivity of F0 and F2 cells to the chemotherapeutic drug docetaxel. Notably, MTT assays established that the IC₅₀ docetaxel for F2 generated PAIII cells was 24-fold higher than that of the parental F0 cells (Fig. 3f). We further examined differences in the RNA profiles between the F0 and F2 PAIII and DU145 populations using RNA QuantSeq (Supplementary Fig. 3). Pathway and network analyses revealed that apoptotic and survival pathways were most impacted in the F2 prostate cancer cell populations underscoring that MSCs can drive the selection for apoptosis-resistant sub-populations of prostate cancer.

**Fig. 3: MSCs select for apoptotic resistant prostate cancer cell populations.**

MSCs accelerate prostate cancer progression in bone

To assess the effects of MSC selection on bone metastatic prostate cancer disease progression, immunocompromised animals were intratibially injected with luciferase-expressing F0 and F2 PAIII cell lines (2 × 10⁴; n ≥ 7) in the presence or absence of mouse MSCs (2 × 10⁴; n ≥ 7). Sham injected contralateral limbs in each animal served as an internal baseline control. Analysis of bioluminescence over time showed that that the F2 cell line, rather than being suppressed by MSCs, grew at significantly faster rates compared to all other cohorts (Fig. 4a). Interestingly, F0 and F2 PAIII-derived tumors grew at comparable rates, suggesting that MSCs drive the accelerated growth effects of the F2 PAIII cell line in vivo. In accord with the phenotypes manifest in vivo, IHC analysis of α-SMA demonstrated the persistence of the MSCs in the cancer-bone microenvironment over the course of the studies (Fig. 4b). Ex vivo analyses of the proliferative indices of F0 versus F2 PAIII cells agreed with the in vivo bioluminescence readouts, where there were significantly higher rates of proliferation in the F2 PAIII cells when grown with MSC compared to all other groups (Fig. 4c). Further, analysis of apoptotic indices showed significantly more apoptosis occurring in the F0 MSC treated group (Fig. 4d). Although there was little impact of MSC on parental versus F2 PAIII prostate cancer cells on associated bone disease, as measured by μCT or histomorphometry analyses (Fig. 4e, f), there were significantly higher numbers of osteoclasts in the F2 PAIII-alone cohort (Fig. 4g). While this is indicative of higher rates of bone remodeling, it did not manifest as increased cancer-induced bone destruction.

**Fig. 4: MSC selected prostate cancer cell growth is promoted rather than suppressed by the presence of MSCs.**

Proteinase-K treatment and heat inactivation of the MSC CM revealed that a soluble protein was necessary for the observed apoptotic effects in co-culture with prostate cancer cells (Fig. 5a). To identify potential apoptosis inducing factors, cytokine arrays were performed, which revealed that Fas ligand (FasL), galectin 1 (GAL1), and interleukin-28 (IL-28) were specifically found in MSC-derived conditioned media (Fig. 5b). IL-28 is known to trigger apoptosis but has not been explored in the context of bone metastatic prostate cancer^32,33,34,35. Analysis of publicly available datasets revealed that IL-28, and its cognate receptors IL28Rα and IL10Rβ were expressed in prostate carcinoma compared to prostate glandular epithelium (Supplementary Fig. 4). We also demonstrated the presence of the IL-28Rα in pan-cytokeratin positive prostate cancer cells in human samples of bone metastatic prostate cancer (Supplementary Figure 4). Next, we tested if PCa cells were sensitive to IL-28 induced apoptosis. Both F0 and F2 PAIII prostate cancer cells expressed IL-28Rα and IL-10Rβ, whereas MSCs expressed IL-28 (Fig. 5c). Notably, using recombinant IL-28, F2 PAIII cells were significantly more resistant to IL-28 mediated cell death, with an IC₅₀ > 35-fold higher than that observed in the parental F0 cell lines (F0 IC₅₀ = 244 pg/ml, F2 IC₅₀ = 9145 pg/ml; Fig. 5d). Further, addition of IL-28 neutralizing antibody to MSC CM, but not of isotype-matched IgG, ablated MSC-induced apoptosis of parental F0 PAIII cells (Fig. 5e). Similarly, efficient shRNA-directed knockdown of IL-28Rα expression in parental PAIII cells blocked MSC- and IL-28-induced apoptosis without affecting the growth of these cells (Fig. 5f, g). In contrast, MSC CM or recombinant IL-28 triggered rapid decreases in cell number in scrambled shRNA control cells (Fig. 5g). Similar findings were observed following shRNA-directed knockdown of IL-28Rα in DU145 PCa cells (Fig. 5h, i), confirming the role of MSC-derived IL-28 in mediating the observed apoptotic effect.

**Fig. 5: MSC-derived IL-28 directs PCa apoptosis.**

Selection for MSC-derived resistance leads to IL-28-STAT3 signaling

Despite clear differences in sensitivity to IL-28-induced apoptosis, levels of IL-28Rα were similar in F0 versus F2 cell lines, nor did we observe any differences in receptor induction in response to MSC CM over time (Supplementary Fig. 5). IL-28Rα induces phosphorylation of STATs via JAK/TYK kinase activation¹⁸. In the context of cancer, STAT1 is considered a tumor suppressor while STAT3 is often associated with tumor progression¹⁹. Consistent with previous publications²¹, analysis of human bone metastatic specimens (n = 10) demonstrated phosphorylated STAT3 in pan cytokeratin positive prostate cancer cells (Supplementary Fig. 6). We therefore assessed the activity of STAT1 and STAT3 in our PCa cell models by monitoring their total protein levels and phosphorylation status in response to MSC CM over time. In independent experiments, we noted increases in total STAT1 and pSTAT1 in the F0 PAIII compared to F2 PAIII in response to MSC CM while conversely, we observed increased total STAT3 and pSTAT3 (Tyr 705) in the F2 PAIII cells compared F0 cells (Fig. 6a, b). These results were mirrored in DU145 cells (Supplementary Fig. 7). Using quantitative STAT activity assays, we also observed that MSC conditioned media enhanced STAT1 activity in the PAIII and DU145 F0 cell lines compared to F2 response (Fig. 6c, d). Conversely, we identified that MSC CM increased STAT3 activity in the PAIII F2 cell lines (Fig. 6c) but for DU145, MSC CM lowered STAT3 activity in the F0 cells while having no effect on the F2 population (Fig. 6d). These data suggest that the MSC selected apoptosis resistant prostate cancer cells favor STAT3 over STAT1 signaling. Finally, in accord with its known pro-tumorigenic roles³⁶, siRNA-directed knockdown of STAT3 (Fig. 6e, g), reduced the growth of all PCa cells with the addition of MSC CM to the STAT3 silenced cells having little further effect on cell viability (Fig. 6f, h).

**Fig. 6: Elevated STAT3 signaling in MSC selected prostate cancer cell lines.**

STAT3 inhibition mitigates the growth of MSC-educated prostate cancer cells

JAKs mediate IL-28Rα and IL-10β signal transduction³³, and several JAK inhibitors have entered the clinical setting³⁷. Treatment with the JAK1/JAK2 inhibitor ruxolitinib reduced STAT3 phosphorylation and impaired the growth of both F0 and F2 MSC-selected F2 PAIII and DU145 cells (Fig. 7a and Supplementary Fig. 7). Of note, in this system, ruxolitinib and S3I-201 had little to no effect on STAT1 activity (Supplementary Fig. 8). These data suggest likely differing pathway activities for IL-28 in the context of prostate cancer cell signaling.

**Fig. 7: STAT3 inhibition impairs the growth of MSC-selected prostate cancer in vitro and in vivo.**

We next focused on specific inhibition of STAT3. Translational efforts in this area have proven challenging, but the development of STAT3 inhibitors is important given high levels of pSTAT3 in advanced cancers^19,20,21,36. In collaborative efforts, we previously developed S3I-201, an inhibitor that prevents STAT3 dimerization, and demonstrated its efficacy in treating breast cancer growth in vivo with no noted toxicities³⁸. Notably, treatment with S3I-201 selectively impaired the growth of the MSC-selected F2 PAIII and DU145 cell lines with little effects on F0 parental cell lines (Fig. 7b). The specificity of S3I-201 was confirmed in STAT3-silenced F2 cell lines, where treatment led to no further decrease in cell growth than that provoked by knockdown of STAT3 alone (Fig. 7c).

To test the sensitivity of the F2 generated prostate cancer cell lines to STAT3 inhibition, we assessed the efficacy of the S3I-201 inhibitor in vivo. Mice were intratibially injected with luciferase expressing F0 and F2 DU145 cell lines and randomized after 7 days into vehicle control (n = 10) or S3I-201 groups (n = 10). Over time we observed that S3I-201 significantly reduced the intraosseous growth of the F0 and F2 groups compared to their respective controls (Fig. 7d). Normalization to controls at study endpoint further demonstrated that S3I-201 was more effective in reducing the growth of the F2 DU145 compared to the F0 DU145 population (Fig. 7e). Ex vivo analyses of the injected tibia revealed that S3I-201 significantly inhibited the proliferation of the F0 and F2 PCa cells (pHistone H3) while augmenting the apoptosis index (cleaved caspase-3), particularly in the F2 group (Fig. 7f, g). Consistent with reduced cancer growth, S3I-201 also protected against cancer-associated bone disease as measured by μCT, X-ray, histomorphometry and TRAcP staining (Supplementary Fig. 9). S3I-201 also effectively limited the growth of F2 PAIII PCa cell lines in vivo and significantly mitigated proliferation (pHistone H3) (Supplementary Fig. 10). Despite decreased tumor growth, we detected no differences in cancer-associated bone disease but this may be due to the rapid nature of the PAIII model (2 weeks) compared to the DU145 model (6 weeks). Importantly, however, our findings establish that MSC-selected apoptosis resistant F2 prostate cancer cells are highly sensitive to STAT3 inhibition in vivo.

Discussion

Bone metastatic prostate cancer remains incurable and affects the majority of men diagnosed with recurrent castrate resistant disease. These metastatic lesions are associated with extensive bone remodeling, which generates factors that promote the growth, survival and persistence of prostate cancer cells in the face of applied systemic ADT and chemotherapies^3,39,40. Understanding how osteoblasts and osteoclasts mediate these effects has led to the development of therapies that target the microenvironment, such as the RANKL binding monoclonal antibody denosumab and nitrogen containing bisphosphonates that block osteoclast formation and activity³. While effective in preventing skeletal pathologies such as fracture, these therapies are, unfortunately, largely palliative.

The heavy infiltrates of osteoblast progenitor MSCs in bone metastatic prostate cancer we observed is not surprising considering the bony nature of these lesions, and that prostate cancers are known to drive MSCs into an osteoblastic phenotype^{9,17,24,25,41}. However, the dynamic effects of MSCs in promoting apoptosis and hence the selection for therapy resistance disease via MSC-derived IL-28 was unexpected, where MSC-derived IL-28-induced apoptosis drives the selection for broadly resistant subpopulations that are growth stimulated rather than repressed by MSCs. Further, the switch from apoptosis sensitivity to resistance was accompanied by a shift in STAT1 to STAT3 signaling that we have shown represents a vulnerability. Our in vivo studies demonstrated that STAT3 inhibition with S3I-201, was effective in significantly reducing the growth of MSC-selected prostate cancer. Our working hypothesis is that upon entry into the bone marrow, metastatic prostate cancer cells interact with resident MSCs resulting in the majority of the cancer cells being eliminated. Over time, however, MSCs eventually select for prostate cancer cells that are refractory to IL-28 induced apoptosis and have increased STAT3 signaling. Interestingly, we found that the MSC selected prostate cancer cells are also cross resistant to chemotherapies such as etoposide and docetaxel suggesting that STAT3 inhibition could be a viable route to resensitizing bone metastatic prostate cancer that is refractory to chemotherapy.

The tumor-promoting properties of MSCs revealed herein are largely in accord with studies establishing that MSCs contribute to, and in some cases are necessary for, tumor progression. For example, in breast cancer, intratumoral MSCs express chemokine ligand 5 (CCL5) that promotes invasion and metastasis¹³, and co-inoculation with MSCs promotes progression and metastasis of both osteosarcoma and ovarian cancer^42,43. Mechanisms ascribed to these effects include angiogenesis and protection from hypoxia via the secretion of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), immune suppression/modulation, the suppression of apoptosis, and the induction of the epithelial to mesenchymal transition (EMT) program^44,45. Consistent with the positive effect of MSCs on cancer cell growth, we have shown here that bone-marrow derived MSCs enhance the proliferation of a subset of metastatic prostate cancer cell lines, such as C4-2B, which of note is derived from in vivo LNCaP bone metastases and has endogenously elevated levels of STAT3 activity⁴⁶. Conversely, MSCs can have tumor suppressive effects in hepatoma and glioma where they induce cell-cycle arrest and apoptosis⁴⁷. MSC-derived interferons (IFNs) have been shown to trigger apoptosis MCF-7 breast cancer cells via activation of STAT1⁴⁸. Notably, a similar mechanism appears manifest in prostate cancer cells that are vulnerable to MSC-derived IL-28 induced apoptosis via STAT1 activation.

As documented here, IL-28 joins a cast of other cytokines that activate STAT3, including IL-11, leukemia inhibitory factor (LIF), oncostatin M (OSM) and IL-31^49,50. STAT3 has clear roles in driving cancer progression and therapy resistance but rather little has been described regarding the tumorigenic roles of IL-28^{19,21,51,52,53}. In a mouse model of B16 melanoma progression, IL-28 reduces tumorigenicity but how this occurs is not clear and could represent effects on immune surveillance⁵⁴. This remains an important area for future investigation in bone metastatic prostate cancer, where syngeneic cell lines in immunocompetent animals (TRAMP-C3, MyC-CAP, RM1) will allow for the study of MSCs and IL-28 on infiltrating immune cells.

In addition to IL-28 our cytokine array analysis also revealed the presence of additional apoptotic factors in the MSC CM, such as FasL. Indeed, release of FasL via matrix metalloproteinase-7 (MMP-7) has been shown to be responsible for prostate epithelial cell apoptosis during involution of the organ subsequent to castration⁵⁵. This phenomenon has also been demonstrated in the mammary gland where expression of a MMP-7 transgene in mammary epithelium augments apoptosis and involution at weaning but eventually provokes the development of hyperplasia in multiparous mice⁵⁶. Further, chronic exposure of breast cancer cells to soluble FasL selects for apoptosis resistant subpopulations⁵⁷. However, in our models, though PAIII are sensitive to FasL-induced apoptosis (Supplementary Fig. S11), immunodepletion of IL-28 completely abrogates the apoptotic effects of MSC CM (Fig. 5e).

MSC-selected apoptosis-resistant prostate cancer cells have elevated pSTAT3 and hyperactivation of STAT3 signaling occurs in many human cancers where it connotes poor prognosis and resistance to chemotherapy and radiation therapy^52,58. In bone metastatic prostate cancer, IHC analyses have identified that the majority of cases studied are positive for STAT3, and kinome profiling have shown elevated activity of JAK2, which phosphorylates STAT3 at Tyr705 resulting in head to tail dimerization, translocation to the nucleus and binding to the promoters of target survival genes such as BCL-xL and survivin⁵⁹. Here we have shown preferential STAT3 activity in MSC/IL-28-resistant prostate cancer that confers resistance to chemotherapies used to treat bone metastatic prostate cancer. Since there is no change in the level of IL28Rα or IL10Rβ, it is not clear at this juncture what causes the termination of STAT1 phosphorylation in the MSC educated prostate cancer cells. STAT inactivation can be controlled by a number of mechanisms that might be altered between the F0 and F2 populations including protein tyrosine phosphatases that depending on kinetics and cellular compartmentalization may preferentially dephosphorylate specific STATs^60,61,62. Suppressors of cytokine signaling (SOCS) and protein inhibitors of activated STATs (PIAS) can also act as inhibitors of STATs or direct them for protein degradation⁶⁰. For example, STAT interacting LIM protein (SLIM) acts as a ubiquitin E3 ligase and can direct STATs, in particular STAT1, for proteasomal degradation⁶³. Further, STAT3 itself can bind to STAT1 and prevent the transcription of STAT1 target gene suggesting that STAT3 activity in the F2 cells could further limit STAT1 activity⁶⁴. RNA QuantSeq analysis comparing the MSC educated F2 cell lines to their parental counterparts also demonstrated that genes such as SPRY2 (a negative regulator of interferon signaling and IFN inducible genes) were significantly downregulated in MSC educated cells. Further, bioinformatic analyses of the most downregulated pathways and networks in the MSC educated PAIII and DU145 F2 populations are; apoptosis regulated by mitochondrial proteins and apoptotic mitochondria respectively (Supplementary Fig. 3). Interestingly, STAT3 has been shown to accumulate in the mitochondria⁶⁵, prevent mitochondrial mediated apoptosis and is linked to enhanced survival and drug resistance^66,67. We should also note that deletion of STAT3 and PTEN in genetically engineered mouse models promoted prostate cancer progression and soft tissue metastasis (liver and lungs)⁵³. Further, STAT3 expression was detected in only ~40% of metastases but the location of the metastases was not obvious. The tumor microenvironmental context of the metastases can have profound effects on cancer cell behavior. Given that other reports have identified high STAT3 positivity in bone metastatic prostate cancer²¹ and that the majority of prostate cancer in humans metastasizes to the skeleton³, we believe that STAT3 may be an important regulator of prostate cancer progression, specifically in bone. Importantly, STAT3 is also revealed here to be a targetable vulnerability that disables the growth of bone metastatic PCa, suggesting that STAT3 inhibitors such S3I-201³⁸, which appears well-tolerated in pre-clinical studies, and have potential in the prostate cancer clinic. Alternatively, FDA approved JAK2 inhibitors such as ruxolitinib could be considered for the treatment of metastatic CRPC patients, yet to date ruxolitinib has shown only very modest effects in phase II clinical trials (NCT00638378), suggesting more specific targeting of JAK2 or better delivery methods are required to realize the therapeutic potential of JAK2 inhibition.

In conclusion, we have shown that bone marrow-derived MSCs drive the emergence of apoptosis resistant subpopulations of prostate cancer cells via the chronic exposure to MSC-derived IL-28, and that this is associated with increases in STAT3 activity that are necessary for the maintenance of bone metastatic PCa. Our findings also indicate that the application of STAT3 inhibitors may resensitize prostate cancer cells to chemotherapy and that, given the role of STAT3 activity in the progression of a wide range of cancers, the mechanism described herein may have broad applicability to other skeletal malignancies and/or metastases.

Methods

Cell lines, culture, and animals

LNCaP (Cat # CRL-1740), DU145 (HTB-81), MC3T3 (CRL-2594), RWPE-1 (CRL-11609), V-CAP (CRL-2876), 22RV1 (CRL-2505) MyC-CaP (CRL-3255) cell lines were purchased from the ATCC. PC3-2M cells were purchased from Perkin Elmer, PrEC prostate epithelial cells (CC-2555) and human MSCs (PT-2501) were purchased from Lonza while PAIII cells [27] and C4-2B [67] were kindly donated. All cell lines were periodically mycoplasma tested (CUL001B, R&D Systems) and short tandem repeat (STR) verified at the Moffitt Clinical Translational Research Core. Cell lines were passaged in recommended culture medium supplemented with 10% fetal calf serum (FCS). Isolation and culture methods for mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) were adapted from previously published protocols⁶⁸. Briefly, hind limbs were collected from tumor-naive 4–6-week-old male C57/BL6 Rag2−/− mice in sterile PBS. Following removal of muscle tissue, epiphyses were removed and bone marrow flushed three times with sterile PBS to deplete the hematopoietic cells. Flushed bones were then cut into 1–3 mm chips, digested with 1 mg/mL collagenase II (Invitrogen) in α-MEM with 15% FBS, and shaken at 150 RPM for 1 h at 37 °C. Digested bone fragments were grown in 6-well tissue culture plates in α-MEM with 15% FCS. Medium was changed every 3 days. For direct co-culture experiments, cancer cells expressing luciferase were cultured with murine MSCs at multiple ratios seeded for a total density of 2×10⁴ in 48-well plates. Co-cultures were incubated for 48 h, and PAIII growth was measured by bioluminescence using the Promega Luciferase Assay System (E1500) per the manufacturer’s instructions. For analyses assessing the growth of cancer cell lines in response to MSC CM, MTT assays were used. Prostate cancer cell lines were plated in 96-well plates at a density of 1×10⁴ cells/well and treated with MSC conditioned media. Cell viability was measured at 48 h by the MTT assay following the manufacturer’s instructions (CellTiter 96, #G3582, Pierce) by measuring absorbance at 490 nm after 4 h of incubation at 37 °C.

Migration assay

Cells were serum starved for 2 h before trypsinizing and seeding (2 × 10⁵ cells) into upper chambers of 24-well Transwell membrane assay system (Corning). Lower chambers were prepared either 650 µl of either serum free, 1% serum or MSC CM. All conditions were performed in triplicate and incubated for 5 h at 37 °C. After incubation, upper chambers were rinsed in DI water followed by 1× PBS and fixation in methanol at −20 °C for 20 min. The chambers were then rinsed in water followed by 1× PBS, and non-migrated cells removed by gentle scrubbing with cotton tip applicators. After rinsing in DI water, membranes were stained with hematoxylin and dehydrated with 100% ethanol. The membranes were air dried dry and excised using a scalpel before mounting on slides with Permount (Fisher Cat # SP15-100). Three fields of view from each membrane were acquired using brightfield microscopy and the number of migrated cells per field counted.

Intratibial tumor studies

Mice were purchased from Jackson Laboratory. All animal experiments were performed with IACUC approval (R1762, CCL) and in accordance with the guidelines set forth in the Guidelines for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals published by the National Institutes of Health. 6-week-old male Rag2−/− mice were intratibially injected with luciferase-expressing PAIII or murine MSCs (2 × 10⁴ in 20 μl of sterile saline), or PAIIIs and murine MSCs 1:1 for a total of (4 × 10⁴ in 20 µl of sterile saline). 6-week-old NSG mice were intratibially injected with luciferase expressing DU145 cells (5 × 10⁵ in 20 μl of sterile saline). Contralateral limbs were injected with saline to control for injury induced changes. For S3I-201 in vivo studies, tumors were allowed to establish for 3 days before randomizing groups for treatment with S3I-201 (5 mg/kg) or sterile PBS administered by intraperitoneal injections in 200 µl volumes every other day. Bioluminescence for all studies was measured twice weekly as a correlate of tumor growth (IVIS™ Perkin Elmer). Mice that showed tumor growth outside of the bone compartment were excluded from all analyses.

Cell line conditioned media collection and treatment

MSCs were cultured in T-75 cell culture flasks until 80–90% confluent. Each flask was rinsed three times with sterile 1× PBS before adding 5 mL of serum free medium. After incubating for 24 h, conditioned media (CM) was centrifuged at 4000 × g for 5 min, transferred to a new tube, and stored at 4 °C. Fresh CM was collected weekly and stored at 4 °C. To test if the MSC-derived factor responsible for prostate cancer apoptosis was a soluble protein, MSC CM and matched control serum free αMEM were either heat inactivated at 95 °C for 30 min or treated with 100 µg/ml proteinase K followed by heat inactivation 95 °C for 30 min. PAIII cells were seeded at 3 × 10⁴ and treated with each respective media type for 24 h. Cell growth was analyzed by luminescence assay (Promega Luciferase Assay System, Cat # E1500).

For IL-28 neutralization studies; PAIII cells were seeded in white wall, solid bottom 96-well plates (5 × 10⁴ cells/well) and incubated for 24 h before treatment with either MSC CM or serum free media control containing either 10 µg/ml of neutralizing antibody (R&D, AF1789) or normal goat IGG (R&D, AB108C). Cells were incubated for 48 h, and growth was analyzed using the Promega Luciferase Assay System, Cat# E1500 following the manufacturer’s instructions.

For docetaxel, recombinant IL-28, JAK2 inhibition (ruxolitinib) and STAT3 inhibition (S3I-201) parental (F0) or MSC-selected prostate cancer cells (F2) cells were seeded (5×10³) in 96 well plates and treated as follows. Docetaxel; 0, 0.0625, 0.125, 0.625, 1.25, 2.5, and 6.25 nM for 48 h. Recombinant IL-28 (R&D mIL-28B, Catalog #1789-ML); 0, 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 8, 16, 32, 64, and 128 ng/ml. Ruxolitinb; 0, 0.0001, 0.001, 0.01, 0.1, 1, and 10 μM. S3I-201 0, 0.1, 0.5, 1, 5, 10, 25, 50, 100, and 150 μM. Cell growth was assayed via luminescence or MTT assay.

Ex vivo bone analysis

Tibias were collected and fixed in 10% formalin for 24–48 h and then transferred to 50% ethanol. Radiographic images (Faxitron, X-ray Corp) were obtained using energy of 35kVp and an exposure time of 8 milliseconds. The spatial resolution is 10 lp/mm (48 μm). The tumor volume (TuV) was calculated as a function of the total tissue volume (TV) of the tibial medullary canal using ImageJ software. For μCT analysis, the proximal tibia metaphyses were scanned (μCT-40; Scanco Medical). An evaluation of trabecular bone structural parameters was performed in a region that consisted of 1 mm starting at 500 μm from the growth plate. A three-dimensional cubical voxel model of bone was built and calculations were made for relative bone volume per total volume and trabecular number. After X-ray and μCT analysis, tibias were decalcified (14% EDTA, pH 7.4, 3 weeks), processed, and paraffin embedded.

Immunofluorescence

For paraffin embedded tissues, slides were dewaxed and rehydrated to water. Antigen retrieval was performed by heat (1× Tris EDTA pH 8.0 in pressure cooker, 5 min). Proteinase K antigen retrieval was used for αSMA staining (7.5 min at room temperature 5 mL 2 M Tris pH 7.5, 5 mL 0.2 M EDTA, 190 mL ddH2O and 400 µL of 10 mg/mL proteinase K). Slides were blocked in 10% goat serum in 1× TBS for 1 h room temperature. Primary antibodies (Pan Cytokeratin, Sigma-Aldrich Cat # C2562. 1:200 dilution; Phospho-Histone H3, Cell Signaling Cat #9701L, 1:200 dilution; Cleaved Caspase 3, Cell Signaling Cat #9661S, 1:200 dilution; Alpha Smooth Muscle Actin (1A4), Cell Signaling Cat # 48938, 1:200 dilution IL-28Rα, Bioss, Cat # ABIN1387718) Cell Signaling Cat#9145 pSTAT3 Tyr705 (D3A7) 1:100 dilution, abcam Cat #ab92574 CD90/Thy1 [EPR3132] 1:100 and R&D Cat# MAB2636 Mouse/Rat Nestin 1:50 were diluted in 10% normal goat serum (Vector Laboratories Cat # S-1000) and incubated overnight at 4 °C in a humidified chamber. After 3 washes in 1× TBST followed by 1 wash in 1× TBS, secondary antibodies (Alexa FluorTM Goat Anti Rabbit 568, (Thermo Fisher Scientific #A-11011); Alexa Fluor Goat Anti Mouse 488, (Thermo Fisher Scientific #A32723) were incubated at a 1:1000 dilution in 10% normal goat serum for 1 h at room temperature. Slides were washed three times in 1× TBS and mounted using Vectashield Antifade Mounting Medium with DAPI (Vector Laboratories, # H-1200). Slides stored in the dark until image acquisition. At least three representative images of tumor sections were acquired and analyzed with Image J.

For in vitro immunofluorescent analyses, PAIII cells were seeded into 8-well chamber slides (LAB-TEK Cat #154534) at 2 × 10⁴ and cultured overnight before treatment with either 50% MSC CM or DMEM 5% FBS or 100 nM etoposide for 5 h. Cells were then rinsed with PBS and fixed in 4% PFA at room temperature for 20 min. Fixed cells were then blocked for 30 min at room temperature in antibody diluting buffer (2% BSA, 0.1% Triton X-100 in PBS). Primary antibodies (Cleaved Caspase 3, Cell Signaling Technology, #9661S), 1:400 dilution in antibody diluting buffer; Rabbit IgG Isotype Control, Thermo Scientific #31235) were incubated at room temperature for 30 min. Cells were then washed 3× in PBS and incubated with secondary antibody (Alexa FluorTM Goat Anti-Rabbit 488, Invitrogen #A-11034, 1:1000 dilution in antibody diluting buffer) for 30 min at room temp in the dark. After washing 3× in PBS, culture chambers were removed and the slides mounted with Vectashield Antifade Mounting Medium with Dapi (Vector Laboratories, # H-1200). Mounted slides were stored in the dark at 4 °C until microscopic analysis. Three representative images were acquired at ×40 magnification and the ratio of cleaved caspase positive to negative cells calculated with ImageJ.

Hematoxylin and Eosin and, TRAP staining

Formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tissue sections (5 μm) were stained with hematoxylin and eosin for histological analyses. For TRAcP staining, slides were incubated in buffer (112 mM anhydrous sodium acetate, 49 mM dibasic dehydrate sodium tartrate, 0.28% glacial acetic acid) containing 1% naphthol-phosphate substrate (2% napthol AS-BI phosphate in 2-ethoxyethanol) for 1 h at 37 °C. Slides were then transferred to buffer containing 250 μl of 5% pararosaniline dye in 2 N HCl and 250 μl of 4% sodium nitrite at 37 °C and monitored for development of red stained osteoclasts. Slides were rinsed in H₂O, counterstained with hematoxylin, and aqueously mounted. The number of bone-lining, multi-nucleated (>3 nuclei per cell), TRAcP positive osteoclasts was quantified from multiple sections.

Immunoblotting and STAT activity assays

Cells were lysed with RIPA (150 mM NaCl, 1 mM EDTA, 1% Triton X-100, 1% sodium deoxycholate, 0.1% SDS, 20 mM Tris, pH 8). Protein concentration was determined by BCA (Pierce, Waltham, MA, USA; #23225). Blots were blocked in 5% BSA for 1 h followed by primary antibody. All primary antibodies were purchased from Cell Signaling Technology (Cleaved Caspase 3 #9661S, pSTAT1 Tyr701 #7649S, pSTAT1 Ser727 #9177, pSTAT3 Tyr705 (D3A7) #9145, STAT3 (D3Z26) #12640S, STAT1 #9172S pJAK2 Y1007/1008 # 3776S), Santa Cruz (IL-10Rβ, Cat# sc271969) or Abcam (IL-28Rα, Cat# ab83865). Primary antibodies were diluted 1:1000 in blocking solution +0.1% Tween-20, and were incubated overnight at 4 °C. Beta Actin (Santa Cruz sc-1615 or Cell Signaling #3700) was used as a loading control. Blots were washed, then incubated with HRP-conjugated anti-species secondary (Cell Signaling Technology, Rabbit #7074/Mouse #7076, 1:1000) and developed by enhanced chemiluminescence followed by exposure to light-sensitive film or imaging by LI-COR Odyssey Fc. MSC CM was analyzed using Ray Biotech Mouse Cytokine Array C-2000 (AAM-CYT-2000) per manufacturer’s instructions. STAT1 and 3 DNA binding activity assays were performed per manufacturer’s lysis buffers (Active Motif, Cat #40010) and instructions (Active Motif, Cat #42296). All full scan blots are presented in supplied Source data files uploaded to Nature Communications.

PCR gene expression

RNA was extracted with TRIzol (Invitrogen #15596) from F0 and F2 PaIII and F0 and F2 DU145 after treatment with MSC CM for 0, 1, 5, 10, and 60 min. Reverse transcription was performed using a High Capacity cDNA Reverse Transcription Kit (Applied Biosystems #4368813). PCR reactions using target specific primers (Supplemental Table S1) were set up using HotStarTaq Master Mix (Qiagen, #203445). PCR cycle conditions were 95 °C for 15 min, followed by 35 cycles (95 °C for 30 s, 57 °C for IL-28Rα and IL10Rβ or 55 °C for IL-28 and 18S; 30 s, 72 °C for 45 s.

shRNA and siRNA of IL-28Rα and STAT3

Lentivirus expressing human or rat IL-28Rα shRNA (Origene, human; HT144125A-D, Rat; HT144126A-D, scrambled control; TR30033) were generated using standard procedures. PAIII and DU145 cells were seeded into 6 well plates (1 × 10⁶/well) and transduced with retrovirus in 4 μg/ml polybrene. After 24 h the media was replaced with 2 mls of 10% serum containing DMEM without antibiotics for 48 h to allow for recovery. Stable clones were selected via treatment with media containing blasticidin (8 µg/ml). Prior to analysis, IL-28Rα levels were analyzed via immunoblot as described. For STAT3 siRNA, 1 × 10⁶ cells from each cell line were seeded into individual 6 well plates and incubated overnight. Cells were transfected using lipofectomine RNAiMAX (Thermo Fisher Scientific # 13778500) with either rat (Origene; SR501698A-C), human (SR321907A-C) or control (SR2004) siRNAs according to manufacturer’s instructions. At 48 h post transfection, cells were trypsinized and seeded (3 × 10³) in triplicate in 96 well plates for growth analysis at 24, 48, and 72 h. Remaining cells were lysed and assessed by immunoblot as described for total STAT3.

Statistical analysis

To determine statistical significance among groups, all sample sizes were greater than or equal to n of 3 and all measurements were taken from distinct samples. T-test or analysis of variance (ANOVA) followed by Tukey’s multiple comparison test was performed. A p-value <0.05 was considered as statistically significant. Data are presented as standard error from the mean (S.E.M). All statistical analyses were performed with Graph Pad Prism 6.0 (GraphPad Inc. LaJolla, CA). Further analysis of the data were performed by the Moffitt biostatistics and bioinformatics shared resource.

Data availability

The RNA QuantSeq data have been deposited in the NCBI Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) database under the accession code GSE 163374 and are available at https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/query/acc.cgi?acc=GSE163374. All the data supporting the findings of this study are available within the article and its Supplementary information files and from the corresponding author upon reasonable request. A reporting summary for this article is available as a Supplementary Information file. Source data are provided with this paper.

References

Bubendorf, L. et al. Metastatic patterns of prostate cancer: an autopsy study of 1,589 patients. Hum. Pathol. 31, 578–583 (2000).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Petrylak, D. P. et al. Docetaxel and estramustine compared with mitoxantrone and prednisone for advanced refractory prostate cancer. N. Engl. J. Med 351, 1513–1520 (2004).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Frieling, J. S., Basanta, D. & Lynch, C. C. Current and emerging therapies for bone metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer. Cancer Control. 22, 109–120 (2015).
Article PubMed Google Scholar
Guise, T. A. et al. Basic mechanisms responsible for osteolytic and osteoblastic bone metastases. Clin. Cancer Res. 12, 6213s–6216s (2006).
Article ADS CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Weilbaecher, K. N., Guise, T. A. & McCauley, L. K. Cancer to bone: a fatal attraction. Nat. Rev. Cancer 11, 411–425 (2011).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Wexler, S. A. et al. Adult bone marrow is a rich source of human mesenchymal ‘stem’ cells but umbilical cord and mobilized adult blood are not. Br. J. Haematol. 121, 368–374 (2003).
Article PubMed Google Scholar
Wang, H. et al. The osteogenic niche promotes early-stage bone colonization of disseminated breast cancer cells. Cancer Cell 27, 193–210 (2015).
Article PubMed PubMed Central CAS Google Scholar
Ren, G., Esposito, M. & Kang, Y. Bone metastasis and the metastatic niche. J. Mol. Med. (Berl.) 93, 1203–1212 (2015).
Article CAS Google Scholar
Fritz, V. et al. Bone-metastatic prostate carcinoma favors mesenchymal stem cell differentiation toward osteoblasts and reduces their osteoclastogenic potential. J. Cell Biochem. 112, 3234–3245 (2011).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Rhee, K. J., Lee, J. I. & Eom, Y. W. Mesenchymal stem cell-mediated effects of tumor support or suppression. Int J. Mol. Sci. 16, 30015–30033 (2015).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Klopp, A. H., Gupta, A., Spaeth, E., Andreeff, M. & Marini, F. 3rd Concise review: Dissecting a discrepancy in the literature: do mesenchymal stem cells support or suppress tumor growth? Stem Cells 29, 11–19 (2011).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Atsuta, I. et al. Mesenchymal stem cells inhibit multiple myeloma cells via the Fas/Fas ligand pathway. Stem cell Res. Ther. 4, 111 (2013).
Article PubMed PubMed Central CAS Google Scholar
Karnoub, A. E. et al. Mesenchymal stem cells within tumour stroma promote breast cancer metastasis. Nature 449, 557–563 (2007).
Article ADS CAS PubMed Google Scholar
De Boeck, A. et al. Bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells promote colorectal cancer progression through paracrine neuregulin 1/HER3 signalling. Gut 62, 550–560 (2013).
Article PubMed CAS Google Scholar
Mi F. & Gong L. Secretion of interleukin-6 by bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells promotes metastasis in hepatocellular carcinoma. Biosci Rep 37, BSR20170181 (2017).
Zong, C. et al. The distinct roles of mesenchymal stem cells in the initial and progressive stage of hepatocarcinoma. Cell Death Dis. 9, 345 (2018).
Article PubMed PubMed Central CAS Google Scholar
Ridge, S. M., Sullivan, F. J. & Glynn, S. A. Mesenchymal stem cells: key players in cancer progression. Mol. Cancer 16, 31 (2017).
Article PubMed PubMed Central CAS Google Scholar
Kotenko, S. V. IFN-lambdas. Curr. Opin. Immunol. 23, 583–590 (2011).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Friedrich, K., Dolznig, H., Han, X. & Moriggl, R. Steering of carcinoma progression by the YIN/YANG interaction of STAT1/STAT3. Biosci. Trends 11, 1–8 (2017).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Santoni M. et al. Role of STAT3 pathway in genitourinary tumors. Future Sci. OA 1, FSO15 (2015).
Don-Doncow, N. et al. Expression of STAT3 in prostate cancer metastases. Eur. Urol. 71, 313–316 (2017).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Drake, J. M. et al. Metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer reveals intrapatient similarity and interpatient heterogeneity of therapeutic kinase targets. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 110, E4762–E4769 (2013).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Roudier, M. P. et al. Histopathological assessment of prostate cancer bone osteoblastic metastases. J. Urol. 180, 1154–1160 (2008).
Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Luo, J. et al. Infiltrating bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells increase prostate cancer stem cell population and metastatic ability via secreting cytokines to suppress androgen receptor signaling. Oncogene 33, 2768–2778 (2014).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Brennen, W. N., Chen, S., Denmeade, S. R. & Isaacs, J. T. Quantification of mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) at sites of human prostate cancer. Oncotarget 4, 106–117 (2013).
Article PubMed Google Scholar
Kobolak, J., Dinnyes, A., Memic, A., Khademhosseini, A. & Mobasheri, A. Mesenchymal stem cells: Identification, phenotypic characterization, biological properties and potential for regenerative medicine through biomaterial micro-engineering of their niche. Methods 99, 62–68 (2016).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Xie, L., Zeng, X., Hu, J. & Chen, Q. Characterization of nestin, a selective marker for bone marrow derived mesenchymal stem cells. Stem Cells Int 2015, 762098 (2015).
Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Cook, L. M. et al. Predictive computational modeling to define effective treatment strategies for bone metastatic prostate cancer. Sci. Rep. 6, 29384 (2016).
Article ADS CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Hodde, J. P., Suckow, M. A., Wolter, W. R. & Hiles, M. C. Small intestinal submucosa does not promote PAIII tumor growth in Lobund-Wistar rats. J. Surg. Res 120, 189–194 (2004).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Luhach I. et al. Rapid ex vivo imaging of PAIII prostate to bone tumor with SWIFT-MRI. Magn. Reson. Med. 72, 858–863 (2014).
Araujo, A., Cook, L. M., Lynch, C. C. & Basanta, D. An integrated computational model of the bone microenvironment in bone-metastatic prostate cancer. Cancer Res. 74, 2391–2401 (2014).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Tezuka, Y. et al. Potential anti-tumor effect of IFN-lambda2 (IL-28A) against human lung cancer cells. Lung Cancer 78, 185–192 (2012).
Article PubMed Google Scholar
Li, Q. et al. Novel type III interferons produce anti-tumor effects through multiple functions. Front. Biosci. (Landmark Ed.) 18, 909–918 (2013).
Article CAS Google Scholar
Song, B. et al. Adenovirus expressing IFN-lambda (Ad/hIFN-lambda) produced anti-tumor effects through inducing apoptosis in human tongue squamous cell carcinoma cell. Int J. Clin. Exp. Med. 8, 12509–12518 (2015).
CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Girkin, J. L. et al. TRAIL signaling is proinflammatory and proviral in a murine model of rhinovirus 1B infection. Am. J. Physiol. Lung Cell Mol. Physiol. 312, L89–L99 (2017).
Article PubMed Google Scholar
Wake, M. S. & Watson, C. J. STAT3 the oncogene - still eluding therapy? FEBS J. 282, 2600–2611 (2015).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Hubbard, S. R. Mechanistic insights into regulation of JAK2 tyrosine kinase. Front. Endocrinol. (Lausanne) 8, 361 (2017).
Article Google Scholar
Siddiquee, K. et al. Selective chemical probe inhibitor of Stat3, identified through structure-based virtual screening, induces antitumor activity. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 104, 7391–7396 (2007).
Article ADS CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Lee, Y. C. et al. Identification of bone-derived factors conferring de novo therapeutic resistance in metastatic prostate cancer. Cancer Res 75, 4949–4959 (2015).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Logothetis, C., Morris, M. J., Den, R. & Coleman, R. E. Current perspectives on bone metastases in castrate-resistant prostate cancer. Cancer Metastasis Rev. 37, 189–196 (2018).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Jin, F. et al. Regulation of prostate cancer cell migration toward bone marrow stromal cell-conditioned medium by Wnt5a signaling. Mol. Med. Rep. 8, 1486–1492 (2013).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Spaeth, E. L. et al. Mesenchymal stem cell transition to tumor-associated fibroblasts contributes to fibrovascular network expansion and tumor progression. PLoS ONE 4, e4992 (2009).
Article ADS PubMed PubMed Central CAS Google Scholar
Xu, W. T., Bian, Z. Y., Fan, Q. M., Li, G. & Tang, T. T. Human mesenchymal stem cells (hMSCs) target osteosarcoma and promote its growth and pulmonary metastasis. Cancer Lett. 281, 32–41 (2009).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Dias, S., Shmelkov, S. V., Lam, G. & Rafii, S. VEGF(165) promotes survival of leukemic cells by Hsp90-mediated induction of Bcl-2 expression and apoptosis inhibition. Blood 99, 2532–2540 (2002).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Konig, A. et al. Basic fibroblast growth factor (bFGF) upregulates the expression of bcl-2 in B cell chronic lymphocytic leukemia cell lines resulting in delaying apoptosis. Leukemia 11, 258–265 (1997).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Mohanty, S. K. et al. STAT3 and STAT5A are potential therapeutic targets in castration-resistant prostate cancer. Oncotarget 8, 85997–86010 (2017).
Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Ramasamy, R. et al. Mesenchymal stem cells inhibit proliferation and apoptosis of tumor cells: impact on in vivo tumor growth. Leukemia 21, 304–310 (2007).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Ryu, H. et al. Adipose tissue-derived mesenchymal stem cells cultured at high density express IFN-beta and suppress the growth of MCF-7 human breast cancer cells. Cancer Lett. 352, 220–227 (2014).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Chang, Q. et al. The IL-6/JAK/Stat3 feed-forward loop drives tumorigenesis and metastasis. Neoplasia 15, 848–862 (2013).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Johnson, D. E., O’Keefe, R. A. & Grandis, J. R. Targeting the IL-6/JAK/STAT3 signalling axis in cancer. Nat. Rev. Clin. Oncol. 15, 234–248 (2018).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Abdulghani, J. et al. Stat3 promotes metastatic progression of prostate cancer. Am. J. Pathol. 172, 1717–1728 (2008).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Frank, D. A. STAT3 as a central mediator of neoplastic cellular transformation. Cancer Lett. 251, 199–210 (2007).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Pencik, J. et al. STAT3 regulated ARF expression suppresses prostate cancer metastasis. Nat. Commun. 6, 7736 (2015).
Article ADS CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Lasfar, A. et al. Characterization of the mouse IFN-lambda ligand-receptor system: IFN-lambdas exhibit antitumor activity against B16 melanoma. Cancer Res 66, 4468–4477 (2006).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Powell, W. C., Fingleton, B., Wilson, C. L., Boothby, M. & Matrisian, L. M. The metalloproteinase matrilysin (MMP-7) proteolytically generates active soluble Fas ligand and potentiates epithelial cell apoptosis. Curr. Biol. 9, 1441–1447 (1999).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Vargo-Gogola, T., Fingleton, B., Crawford, H. C. & Matrisian, L. M. Matrilysin (matrix metalloproteinase-7) selects for apoptosis-resistant mammary cells in vivo. Cancer Res 62, 5559–5563 (2002).
CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Fingleton, B., Vargo-Gogola, T., Crawford, H. C. & Matrisian, L. M. Matrilysin [MMP-7] expression selects for cells with reduced sensitivity to apoptosis. Neoplasia 3, 459–468 (2001).
Bromberg, J. Stat proteins and oncogenesis. J. Clin. Invest 109, 1139–1142 (2002).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Cimica, V., Chen, H. C., Iyer, J. K. & Reich, N. C. Dynamics of the STAT3 transcription factor: nuclear import dependent on Ran and importin-beta1. PLoS One 6, e20188 (2011).
Article ADS CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Boeru, V., Manea, E. & Olariu, M. [The effect of thymectomy and the polypeptide thymus extract TP2 on the nucleic acid and cholesterol content of the testicle and on serum testosterone in the rat]. Endocrinologie 27, 65–71 (1989).
CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Jandhyala, B. S., Cavero, I. & Buckley, J. P. Time-course effects of oral guanethidine administration on cardiovascular and autonomic effects on dogs. Eur. J. Pharm. 36, 21–32 (1976).
Article CAS Google Scholar
Chen, W., Daines, M. O. & Khurana Hershey, G. K. Turning off signal transducer and activator of transcription (STAT): the negative regulation of STAT signaling. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 114, 476–489 (2004). quiz 490.
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Tanaka, T., Soriano, M. A. & Grusby, M. J. SLIM is a nuclear ubiquitin E3 ligase that negatively regulates STAT signaling. Immunity 22, 729–736 (2005).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Ho, H. H. & Ivashkiv, L. B. Role of STAT3 in type I interferon responses. Negative regulation of STAT1-dependent inflammatory gene activation. J. Biol. Chem. 281, 14111–14118 (2006).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Wegrzyn, J. et al. Function of mitochondrial Stat3 in cellular respiration. Science 323, 793–797 (2009).
Article ADS CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Cheng, X., Peuckert, C. & Wolfl, S. Essential role of mitochondrial Stat3 in p38(MAPK) mediated apoptosis under oxidative stress. Sci. Rep. 7, 15388 (2017).
Article ADS PubMed PubMed Central CAS Google Scholar
Poli, V. & Camporeale, A. STAT3-mediated metabolic reprograming in cellular transformation and implications for drug resistance. Front. Oncol. 5, 121 (2015).
Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Zhu, W. et al. Mesenchymal stem cells derived from bone marrow favor tumor cell growth in vivo. Exp. Mol. Pathol. 80, 267–274 (2006).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by a Department of Defense Prostate Cancer Research Program (DOD PCRP) award (CCL: W81XWH1810523) and a Miles for Moffitt Foundation Award. This work was also supported in part by the Core Facilities of the Moffitt Cancer Center Grant P30-CA076292 and by R50CA211447 (HRL). We thank the patients, families, and dedicated researchers; Celestia Higano, Pete Nelson, Evan Yu, Elahe Mostaghel, Bruce Montgomery, Paul Lange, Xiaotun Zhang, Martine Roudier, Lawrence True, Robert Vessella, Eva Corey, Colm Morrissey and the rapid autopsy teams for their contributions to the University of Washington Medical Center Prostate Cancer Donor Rapid Autopsy Program; supported by the Pacific Northwest Prostate Cancer SPORE (P50CA97186). The authors would also like to thank Drs. John Cleveland and Srikumar Chellappan for critical review of this study.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Cancer Biology Ph.D. Program, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL, USA
Jeremy J. McGuire & Chen Hao Lo
Tumor Biology Department, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, FL, USA
Jeremy J. McGuire, Jeremy S. Frieling, Chen Hao Lo, Tao Li & Conor C. Lynch
Department of Drug Discovery, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, FL, USA
Ayaz Muhammad, Harshani R. Lawrence & Nicholas J. Lawrence
Department of Pathology and Microbiology, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE, USA
Leah M. Cook

Authors

Jeremy J. McGuire
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Jeremy S. Frieling
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Chen Hao Lo
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Tao Li
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Ayaz Muhammad
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Harshani R. Lawrence
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Nicholas J. Lawrence
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Leah M. Cook
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Conor C. Lynch
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

C.C. Lynch, J.J. McGuire were responsible for study conception and design. J.J. McGuire, L.M. Cook, A. Muhammad, H. Lawrence, N. Lawrence and C.C. Lynch developed the methodology. J.J. McGuire, J.S. Frieling, L.M. Cook, C.H. Lo, T. Li, and C.C. Lynch acquired the data while J.J. McGuire, J.S. Frieling, N. Lawrence and C.C. Lynch were responsible for analysis and interpretation of data (e.g., statistical analysis, biostatistics, computational analysis). C. C. Lynch, J.J. McGuire, J.S. Frieling and C.H. Lo. were responsible for manuscript writing and editing.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Conor C. Lynch.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Peer review information Nature Communications thanks Haojie Huang and the other, anonymous, reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work.

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Information

Source data

Source Data

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

McGuire, J.J., Frieling, J.S., Lo, C.H. et al. Mesenchymal stem cell-derived interleukin-28 drives the selection of apoptosis resistant bone metastatic prostate cancer. Nat Commun 12, 723 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-021-20962-6

Download citation

Received: 25 July 2018
Accepted: 06 January 2021
Published: 01 February 2021
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-021-20962-6

This article is cited by

Therapeutic and immunomodulatory potentials of mesenchymal stromal/stem cells and immune checkpoints related molecules
- Ali Hazrati
- Kosar Malekpour
- Seyed Mahmoud Hashemi
Biomarker Research (2024)
The bone ecosystem facilitates multiple myeloma relapse and the evolution of heterogeneous drug resistant disease
- Ryan T. Bishop
- Anna K. Miller
- David Basanta
Nature Communications (2024)
Single-cell analysis of immune and stroma cell remodeling in clear cell renal cell carcinoma primary tumors and bone metastatic lesions
- Shenglin Mei
- Adele M. Alchahin
- Ninib Baryawno
Genome Medicine (2024)
The secretion profile of mesenchymal stem cells and potential applications in treating human diseases
- Yuyi Han
- Jianxin Yang
- Yufang Shi
Signal Transduction and Targeted Therapy (2022)
Muscle and Bone Defects in Metastatic Disease
- Martina Pauk
- Hiroaki Saito
- Hanna Taipaleenmäki
Current Osteoporosis Reports (2022)

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.