Spatially dispersing Yu-Shiba-Rusinov states in the unconventional superconductor FeTe0.55Se0.45

Abstract

By using scanning tunneling microscopy (STM) we find and characterize dispersive, energy-symmetric in-gap states in the iron-based superconductor FeTe0.55Se0.45, a material that exhibits signatures of topological superconductivity, and Majorana bound states at vortex cores or at impurity locations. We use a superconducting STM tip for enhanced energy resolution, which enables us to show that impurity states can be tuned through the Fermi level with varying tip-sample distance. We find that the impurity state is of the Yu-Shiba-Rusinov (YSR) type, and argue that the energy shift is caused by the low superfluid density in FeTe0.55Se0.45, which allows the electric field of the tip to slightly penetrate the sample. We model the newly introduced tip-gating scenario within the single-impurity Anderson model and find good agreement to the experimental data.

Introduction

The putative s± superconductor FeTe0.55Se0.45 is peculiar because it has a low Fermi energy and an unusually low and inhomogeneous superfluid density1,2,3,4,5,6,7. It has been predicted to host a topological superfluid and Majorana zero-mode states8,9,10. These predictions have been supported by recent experiments: photoemission has discovered Dirac-like dispersion of a surface state11 while tunneling experiments have concentrated on in-gap states in vortex cores, which have been interpreted as Majorana bound states12,13 since the low Fermi energy allows to distinguish them from conventional low-energy Caroli-Matricon-de Gennes states14.

In-gap states have a long history of shining light into the properties of different host materials, and have allowed to bring insight into gap symmetry and structure, symmetry breaking, or the absence of scattering in topological defects, to name a few15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23,24. Impurity bound states have also been investigated in chains or arrays of magnetic impurities on superconducting surfaces where they can lead to Majorana edge-states25,26,27,28. In the case of FeTe0.55Se0.45, zero-bias in-gap resonances have become a primary way to identify Majorana bound states at magnetic impurity sites or in vortex cores. At impurity sites, robust zero-bias peaks have been reported at interstitial iron locations which suggest the presence of Majorana physics29. In addition, very recently STM experiments reported signatures of reversibility between magnetic impurity bound states and Majorana zero modes by varying the tip-sample distance on magnetic adatoms30. Interestingly, there have also been signatures of spatially varying in-gap impurity states31,32 which are not yet understood.

Here we report the detection of in-gap states at sub-surface impurities, which are spatially dispersing, i.e., they change energy when moving away from the impurity site by a distance of Δy. The energy can also be tuned by changing the tip-sample distance (Δd). We argue that the most likely explanation of our observations involves a magnetic impurity state of the YSR type affected by the electric field of the tip. We show good agreement between our experimental findings and the single impurity Anderson model.

Results

Detection of a particle-hole symmetric in-gap state in FeTe0.55Se0.45

We use FeTe0.55Se0.45 samples with a critical temperature of TC = 14.5 K. They are cleaved at ~30 K in ultra-high vacuum, and immediately inserted into a modified Unisoku STM at a base temperature of 2.2 K, for preventing surface reconstruction and contamination. To increase the energy resolution, we perform all tunneling experiments using a superconducting tip, made by indenting mechanically ground Pt-Ir tips into a clean Pb(111) surface. With the superconducting tip and to leading order in the tunnel coupling, the current-voltage (I − V) characteristic curves are proportional to the convolution of the density of states of Bogoliubov quasiparticles in the tip and the sample

$$I({\bf{r}},V) \sim \int \ {D}_{{\rm{t}}}(\omega +eV){D}_{{\rm{s}}}({\bf{r}},\omega )[f(\omega ,T)-f(\omega +eV,T)]d\omega ,$$
(1)

where Ds(t) is the density of states of the quasiparticles in the sample (tip), f(ω, T) is the Fermi-Dirac distribution at temperature T and e is the electron charge. In such a superconducting tunnel junction the coherence peaks in the conductance spectra, dI/dV(r, V), appear at energies: ± (Δt + Δs), where Δs(t) is the quasiparticle excitation gap of the sample (tip). In addition, the energy resolution is far better than the conventional thermal broadening of ~3.5kBT (kB is the Boltzmann constant) since it is enhanced by the sharpness of the coherence peaks of Dt33,34,35. To obtain the intrinsic local density of states (LDOS) of the sample, Ds(r, ω), we numerically deconvolute our measured dI/dV(r, V) spectra while retaining the enhanced energy resolution (for more details see Supplementary Note 1). For this, we use our knowledge of the density of states of the tip with a gap of Δt = 1.3 meV from test experiments on the Pb(111) surface using the same tip.

Figure 1a shows a topography of the cleaved surface of FeTe0.55Se0.45 obtained with a Pb coated tip (see inset). Brighter (darker) regions correspond to Te (Se) terminated areas of the cleaved surface which has a tetragonal crystal structure. Our samples exhibit no excess Fe atoms or clusters on the cleaved surface. Spatially resolved scanning tunneling spectroscopy shows that most locations have a flat gap, as shown in Fig. 1b, c. However, when we acquire spectra at specific points indicated by black circles (r2 and r3) in Fig. 1a, we find sharp in-gap states. Figure 1d–e and f–g shows such states, both in the raw data as well as in the deconvoluted results. The measured in-gap state is symmetric in energy, i.e., it is visible at ± Eig (Fig. 1g), or at the Fermi level, Eig = 0 (Fig. 1e). In the raw data (before numerical deconvolution) the states are located at energies ± (Δt ± Eig) (see arrows in Fig. 1d and f) due to the use of the superconducting tip.

Spatial dispersion of the in-gap state

In order to characterize the impurity in more detail we acquire a spatially resolved dI/dV(r, V) map in the area shown in Fig. 2a. Three energy layers of the deconvoluted map depicting the LDOS variations are shown in Fig. 2b–d. The impurity exhibits a clear ring-shaped feature which eventually becomes a disk with smaller radius at the Fermi level. A spatial line cut profile along the red dashed line shown in Fig. 2b reveals two symmetric resonances around zero energy that extend over ~10 nm in space (Fig. 2e). Importantly, the energies of the in-gap states vary spatially as shown in the spatial cuts (Fig. 2e–g) obtained from the same conductance map. The dispersion of the in-gap states shows an X-shaped profile where the crossing point is indicated with r0 (Fig. 2a). In more detail, the state is at zero energy at r0, and then moves away from the Fermi level, before fading out slightly below the gap edge. We will show later that the character of this dispersion is dependent on the tip-sample distance, and that there can also be zero or two crossing points. By inspecting the topography at r0 we find no signature of irregularities, which points towards a sub-surface impurity defect as the cause of the observed in-gap peaks in the spectra. We note that these impurities are sparse; we found a total of 5 in a 45 × 45 nm2 field-of-view. These all show the same characteristic dispersions, but the X point is estimated at different tip heights. For details, see Supplementary Note 7. Similar observations have been reported previously on FeTe0.55Se0.45, but without a clear energy cross at the Fermi level31,32.

YSR impurity states

Our observations are reminiscent of YSR states caused by magnetic impurities in conventional superconductors35,36,37,38,39. When a single magnetic impurity is coupled to a superconductor with energy gap Δ via an exchange coupling J then the ground state of the many-body system depends on the interplay between superconductivity and the Kondo effect (described by the Kondo temperature TK). For Δ kBTK the superconducting ground state prevails (unscreened impurity) whereas for Δ < kBTK the Kondo ground state dominates (screened impurity). In each case, quasiparticle excitations above the ground state give rise to resonances symmetrically around the Fermi level inside the superconducting gap. In an STM experiment, this results in peaks in the conductance spectrum at the energy of the two YSR excitations which is determined by the product νFJS, where S is the impurity spin and νF the normal state density of states in the superconducting host (FeTe0.55Se0.45 in our case).

It is important to note that the s± symmetry of the order parameter in FeTe0.55Se0.45 can lead to a very similar phenomenology between magnetic and potential scatterers. While in conventional s-wave superconductors, magnetic impurities are required to create in-gap (YSR) states, in s± superconductors, sub-gap resonances can also occur for non-magnetic scattering centers. This can be shown using different theoretical techniques, including T-matrix method40,41, Bogoliubov-de Gennes equations42,43 and Green’s functions44,45,46 applied to multiband systems with s± symmetry. The similarity of magnetic and potential scatterers makes a distinction between these cases more challenging (but possible, with an external magnetic field30). In either case, theory predicts energy-symmetric in-gap states with particle-hole asymmetric intensities.

The X-shaped phenomenology of the in-gap states shown above shares also similarities with bound-states that have been observed in Pb/Co/Si(111) stacks47, where they have been interpreted as topological47,48. However, as we will show here, in our experiments the single point of zero bias is just one particular case of a manifold of dispersions that depend on the tip-sample distance.

Tuning the energy of the in-gap state with the tip

Figure 3a shows an intensity plot of a series of spectra above r0, the location showing the zero-bias impurity state, with changing tip-sample distance (see inset for a schematic). We normalized each spectrum by the normal state resistance RN = Vset/Iset. In order to reduce the distance, we control the tip in constant current feedback and increase the set-point for the current while keeping the voltage bias constant. In addition, we measure the tip-sample distance relative to the set-point: Vset = 5 mV, Iset = 0.4 nA. Strikingly, we observe a shift in the energy of the in-gap state with varying the tip-sample distance Δd. When the tip is brought closer to the sample surface, the sub-gap resonances shift towards the Fermi energy (Fig. 3b) where they cross and split again. We also point out that there is a strong particle-hole asymmetry in the intensity of the in-gap resonances. It can be clearly seen in Fig. 3b that the relative intensity between the positive (p) and negative (n) resonances (Ip − In) changes sign after the cross at the Fermi level. Further, we note that the energy shift for varying Δd is stronger than the spatial dispersion. This can likely be explained by the tip shape, which can be approximated as a sphere of roughly 20 nm. As the tunneling current falls off exponentially with distance, one always tunnels to the point closest to the surface. However, the field is algebraic in the distance, and thus a change horizontally has less of an effect than a change vertically, as shown in Supplementary Note 5.

To obtain a more complete picture of the tuning of the in-gap states as we vary Δd, we measured five dI/dV(r, V) maps (each at different tip-sample distance) and analyzed azimuthally-averaged radial profiles through the impurity center (Fig. 3c–d shows two of these profiles. See Supplementary Note 3 for the other 3). We extract the energy of the resonances by Lorentzian fits (Fig. 3e), to observe that they cross the Fermi level at the impurity center when being close to the sample. This is the first time that such a crossing has been observed in an unconventional superconductor.

Microscopic origin

The important question that arises is: what tunes the impurity resonances that we observe? In previous experiments with magnetic ad-atoms or ad-molecules on conventional superconductors49,50, it has been shown that the force of the tip changes the coupling between moment and substrate, and that the coupling J and the YSR energy could be tuned in this way. In this case, when the energy crosses the Fermi level at the critical coupling JC, a first-order quantum phase transition between the singlet (screened) and the doublet (unscreened) ground state is expected49,51. Very recently, a similar force-based scenario has been reported in different systems involving magnetic ad-atoms on top of superconductors15, including Fe(Te,Se)30. As discussed in Supplementary Note 2, a similar scenario can in principle explain the sub-gap dispersion discovered here. However, as the impurity is not loosely bound on top of the surface in the present case, a movement between a sub-surface impurity and the superconductor due to the tip force as the cause for the tuning, seems unlikely. Therefore, we pursue alternative mechanisms. Motivated by the phenomenology of semiconductors52 or Mott insulators53, where the tip can act as a local gate electrode (mediated by the poor screening), we propose a similar gating scenario for YSR states in the present case: the electric field of the tip can tune the energy of the impurity state and thus lead to a dispersing YSR state.

First, we note that there can be a significant difference between the work functions of the tip and the sample. Typical work functions are in the range of a few electronvolts, and differences between chemically different materials of the order of an electronvolt are common (see Supplementary Note 5). Hence, it is possible to have a voltage drop between them that is larger than the applied bias. Secondly, the low carrier density in FeTe0.55Se0.45 leads to a non-zero screening length giving rise to penetration of the electric field of the tip inside the sample. An estimation of the penetration depth in the sample can be made in the Thomas-Fermi approximation (cf. e.g.54). In this framework, the screening length is given by $${\lambda }_{{\rm{TF}}}={(\pi {a}_{0}/4{k}_{{\rm{F}}})}^{1/2}$$, where a0 is the Bohr radius and kF the Fermi wave-vector. Using reported parameters11,12, this yields λTF = 0.5 nm, which is comparable to the inter-layer distance55. This implies that in principle, an impurity residing between the topmost layers can be affected by the electric field of the tip. In Supplementary Note 6 we further test this possibility by performing an estimate of the potential shift in the impurity, when the tip-sample distance is varied using a simple model for screening (image charges method) to estimate that the shift is comparable to the charging energy of the impurity. We note that this estimate is approximative, as some key parameters are unknown for FeTe0.55Se0.45.

Based on these considerations, we conclude that it is possible that the tip acts as a local gate electrode that influences the energy levels of the impurity, which in turn influences the energy of the in-gap states, as we will demonstrate in the modelling carried out below. By adjusting the tip-sample distance the field penetration is modulated leading to an energy shift of the in-gap resonances. The spatial dependence can be explained similarly: when moving the tip over the impurity location, we change the local electric field, which is at a maximum when the tip is right above the impurity. We emphasize that, similar to experiments on semiconductors and Mott insulators, we expect that the details of the gating process depend on the tip shape Supplementary Note 5.

Gate-tunable single impurity Anderson model

We model the sub-gap state as a YSR state arising from the magnetic moment of a sub-surface impurity level, whose energy is effectively gated by the tip-induced electric field. It should be noted that the sub-gap states arising in an s±-wave superconductor from a simple non-magnetic impurity can produce a dispersive cross in the in-gap energies as a function of the impurity potential. However, this is only true for a particular range of potentials, and will not generally trace out a single dispersive cross as a function of the impurity strength42,44. Therefore, we are led to conclude that the impurity at hand involves a finite magnetic moment. Local impurity-induced magnetic moments may indeed be particularly prominent in correlated systems like FeSe where even nonmagnetic disorder, in conjunction with electron interactions, can generate local moments56. Because of the magnetic nature of the impurity site, the results of our calculations are qualitatively independent on whether we treat the system as an s or s±-wave superconductor. For simplicity, we perform our calculations assuming standard s-wave pairing.

The superconducting single impurity Anderson model57 involves an impurity level ϵ0 with charging energy U coupled via a tunneling rate Γs to a superconducting bath with energy gap Δs58,59,60. We represent the sample by a simple s-wave Bardeen–Cooper–Schrieffer (BCS) superconductor, and use the zero-bandwidth approximation, including only a single spin-degenerate pair of quasiparticles at energy Δs59,61. We further assume that the gating from the tip changes the impurity level ϵ0 linearly with distance. We then obtain the YSR states by calculating the local impurity spectral function, DI(ω, ϵ0), as a function of ϵ0 (and thus of gating) using the Lehmann representation (see Supplementary Note 2 for details). The result is plotted in Fig. 4a, where the observed crossing of the sub-gap states indicates a change between singlet, and a doublet ground state62. From the spectral function we can determine the current using leading-order perturbation theory in the tunnel coupling connecting the impurity to the tip, tt:

$$I(V)=\frac{e| {t}_{{\rm{t}}}{| }^{2}}{\hslash }\int \ {D}_{{\rm{t}}}(\omega +eV,{\Delta }_{{\rm{t}}},{{\gamma }}_{{\rm{t}}}){D}_{{\rm{I}}}(\omega ,{\epsilon }_{0})[f(\omega ,T)-f(\omega +eV,T)]d\omega ,$$
(2)

here Dt(ω, Δt, γt) is the spectral function of the superconducting tip with a finite quasiparticle broadening incorporated as a Dynes parameter63, γt and the reduced Planck’s constant. A phenomenological relaxation rate, Γr, is incorporated into the Lehmann representation, (see Supplementary Note 2), to construct DI(ω, ϵ0). This parameter accounts for quasiparticle relaxation of the YSR resonances at ω = ± Eig. The validity of the expansion in Γt = πνFtt2, which captures only single electron transport and omits Andreev reflections, rests on the assumption that the sub-gap state thermalizes with rate Γr between each tunneling event. In the opposite limit, Γt Γr, transport takes place via resonant Andreev reflections, and the sub-gap conductance peaks at eV = ± (Δt + Eig) display a bias asymmetry that is reversed compared to the bias asymmetry of the single electron transport regime39. In principle, these two regimes can be differentiated by varying Γt, since the conductance peaks increase linearly with Γt in the single electron regime, and sublinearly in the resonant Andreev regime39,64. The experimental data shown in Fig. 3 display a marked asymmetry, consistent with our assumption of relaxation dominated transport where conductance asymmetry will follow the asymmetry of the underlying spectral function.

Next, we investigate the situations where the tip moves over the impurity along the surface, or towards the impurity as a function of tip-sample distance Δd. These situations are marked with blue and red arrows in Fig. 4a, respectively. In Fig. 4b, c we then plot sub-gap conductance as a function of level position, ϵ0, corresponding to the red/blue traces, assuming a linear dependence of ϵ0 with tip-sample distance. The agreement between our model and the data is good, both in terms of the energy dispersion and the asymmetry. Also, in both experiment and theory, additional conductance peaks at eV = ± (Δt − Eig) are visible close to the singlet-doublet phase transition. We interpret these lines as the additional single electron processes shown in Fig. 4d, which arise from thermal population of the excited state close to the phase transition where EigkBT. The conductance peaks at Δt ± Eig meet at the point where the YSR states cross zero energy, signaling the change between singlet, and doublet ground states, and the asymmetry in intensity between the conductance peaks at eV = ± (Δt + Eig) switches around.

The good agreement between this simple model (Fig. 4b, c) and the data presented in Fig. 2e and a, supports our interpretation that the tip exerts an effective gating of the impurity. We discuss alternative scenarios further in Supplementary Note 2, but the fact that our impurity is below the surface and the excellent agreement between the model and the data lead us to conclude that the gating scenario is most likely in the present case.

In summary, we have reported on the properties of energy symmetric in-gap states in FeTe0.55Se0.45 that can be tuned through the Fermi level. These states extend over a large (~10 nm) area around the center locations. Our data point towards a sub-surface magnetic impurity embedded in a low-density superfluid with large screening length that leads to YSR-like in-gap states. We propose a novel tip-gating mechanism for the dispersion and perform calculations within the single impurity Anderson model that show excellent agreement with the data. Such a mechanism could also play a role in previous experiments on elemental superconductors or heterostructures. How such states are related to the topological superconductivity in FeTe0.55Se0.45 remains an open question. Our work further shows that one needs to be careful when interpreting zero-bias peaks in putative topological states, and junction resistance dependent experiments are a necessary—ideally combinded with other techniques such as noise spectroscopy65,66,67 (see also Supplementary Note 4), spin-polarized STM68, or photon-assisted tunneling69 will allow for better understanding. Independent of this, tunable impurity states like the one we report here could offer a platform to study quantum phase transitions, impurity scattering, and the screening behavior of superfluids.

Methods

Sample preparation

The FeTe0.55Se0.45 single crystal samples were grown using the Bridgman method and show a critical temperature of TC = 14.5 K. We cleave them at ultra-high vacuum (Pbase ~ 1 × 10−10 mbar) and low temperature (~30 K) and immediately insert them to our pre-cooled STM (USM-1500, Unisoku Co., Ltd). The STM tips used in this work are mechanically sharpened Pt-Ir wires. They are Pb-coated by indenting them on a Pb(111) surface which was first cleaned by repetitive cycles of Ar sputtering (Pbase ~ 5 × 10−5 mbar) followed by thermal annealing.

Measurement

Standard lock-in technique is employed for the tunnelling conductance measurements at 887 Hz. All measurements were performed at 2.2 K.

Data availability

The data of this work are available from the corresponding author upon request.

Code availability

The code used in this work is available from the corresponding author upon request.

References

1. 1.

Bendele, M., Weyeneth, S., Puzniak, R., Maisuradze, A. & Pomjakushina, E. et al. Anisotropic superconducting properties of single-crystalline FeSe0.5Te0.5. Phys. Rev. B 81, 224520 (2010).

2. 2.

Homes, C. C., Dai, Y. M., Wen, J. S., Xu, Z. J. & Gu, G. D. FeTe0.55Se0.45: a multiband superconductor in the clean and dirty limit. Phys. Rev. B 91, 144503 (2015).

3. 3.

Cho, D., Bastiaans, K. M., Chatzopoulos, D., Gu, G. D. & Allan, M. P. A strongly inhomogeneous superfluid in an iron-based superconductor. Nature 571, 541 (2019).

4. 4.

Lubashevsky, Y., Lahoud, E., Chashka, K., Podolsky, D. & Kanigel, A. Shallow pockets and very strong coupling superconductivity in FeSexTe1−x. Nat. Phys. 8, 309 (2012).

5. 5.

Rinott, S., Chashka, K. B., Ribak, A., Rienks, E. D. L., Taleb-Ibrahimi, A. et al. Tuning across the BCS-BEC crossover in the multiband superconductor Fe1+ySexTe1−x: an angle-resolved photoemission study. Sci. Adv. 3, 10.1126/sciadv.1602372 (2017).

6. 6.

Miao, H., Brito, W. H., Yin, Z. P., Zhong, R. D. & Gu, G. D. et al. Universal $$2{\Delta }_{\max }/{k}_{{\rm{B}}}{T}_{{\rm{c}}}$$ scaling decoupled from the electronic coherence in iron-based superconductors. Phys. Rev. B 98, 020502 (2018).

7. 7.

Kreisel, A., Hirschfeld, P. J. & Andersen, B. M. On the remarkable superconductivity of FeSe and its close cousins. Symmetry 12, 1 (2020).

8. 8.

Wu, X., Qin, S., Liang, Y., Fan, H. & Hu, J. Topological characters in Fe(Te1−xSex) thin films. Phys. Rev. B 93, 115129 (2016).

9. 9.

Wang, Z., Zhang, P., Xu, G., Zeng, L. K. & Miao, H. et al. Topological nature of the FeSe0.5Te0.5 superconductor. Phys. Rev. B 92, 115119 (2015).

10. 10.

Xu, G., Lian, B., Tang, P., Qi, X.-L. & Zhang, S.-C. Topological superconductivity on the surface of Fe-based superconductors. Phys. Rev. Lett. 117, 047001 (2016).

11. 11.

Zhang, P., Yaji, K., Hashimoto, T., Ota, Y. & Kondo, T. et al. Observation of topological superconductivity on the surface of an iron-based superconductor. Science 360, 182 (2018).

12. 12.

Wang, D., Kong, L., Fan, P., Chen, H. & Zhu, S. et al. Evidence for Majorana bound states in an iron-based superconductor. Science 362, 333 (2018).

13. 13.

Zhu, S., Kong, L., Cao, L., Chen, H. & Papaj, M. et al. Nearly quantized conductance plateau of vortex zero mode in an iron-based superconductor. Science 367, 189 (2020).

14. 14.

Chen, M., Chen, X., Yang, H., Du, Z. & Zhu, X. et al. Discrete energy levels of Caroli-de Gennes-Matricon states in quantum limit in FeTe0.55Se0.45. Nat. Commun. 9, 970 (2018).

15. 15.

Huang, H., Drost, R., Senkpiel, J., Padurariu, C. & Kubala, B. et al. Quantum phase transitions and the role of impurity-substrate hybridization in Yu-Shiba-Rusinov states. Commun. Phys. 3, 199 (2020).

16. 16.

Ménard, G. C., Guissart, S., Brun, C., Pons, S. & Stolyarov, V. S. et al. Coherent long-range magnetic bound states in a superconductor. Nat. Phys. 11, 1013 (2015).

17. 17.

Heinrich, B. W., Pascual, J. I. & Franke, K. J. Single magnetic adsorbates on s-wave superconductors. Prog. Surf. Sci. 93, 1 (2018).

18. 18.

Hudson, E. W., Lang, K. M., Madhavan, V., Pan, S. H. & Eisaki, H. et al. Interplay of magnetism and high-Tc superconductivity at individual Ni impurity atoms in Bi2Sr2CaCu2O8+δ. Nature 411, 920 (2001).

19. 19.

Zhou, B. B., Misra, S., da Silva Neto, E. H., Aynajian, P. & Baumbach, R. E. et al. Visualizing nodal heavy fermion superconductivity in CeCoIn5. Nat. Phys. 9, 474 (2013).

20. 20.

Hoffman, J. E., McElroy, K., Lee, D. H., Lang, K. M. & Eisaki, H. et al. Imaging quasiparticle interference in Bi2Sr2CaCu2O8+δ. Science 297, 1148 (2002).

21. 21.

Allan, M. P., Massee, F., Morr, D. K., Dyke, J. V. & Rost, A. W. et al. Imaging Cooper pairing of heavy fermions in CeCoIn5. Nat. Phys. 9, 468 (2013).

22. 22.

Allan, M. P., Chuang, T.-M., Massee, F., Xie, Y. & Ni, N. et al. Anisotropic impurity states, quasiparticle scattering and nematic transport in underdoped $${\rm{Ca}}{({{\rm{Fe}}}_{1-x}{{\rm{Co}}}_{x})}_{2}{{\rm{As}}}_{2}$$. Nat. Phys. 9, 220 (2013).

23. 23.

Rosenthal, E. P., Andrade, E. F., Arguello, C. J., Fernandes, R. M. & Xing, L. Y. et al. Visualization of electron nematicity and unidirectional antiferroic fluctuations at high temperatures in NaFeAs. Nat. Phys. 10, 225 (2014).

24. 24.

Beidenkopf, H., Roushan, P., Seo, J., Gorman, L. & Drozdov, I. et al. Spatial fluctuations of helical Dirac fermions on the surface of topological insulators. Nat. Phys. 7, 939 (2011).

25. 25.

Sticlet, D. & Morari, C. Topological superconductivity from magnetic impurities on monolayer NbSe2. Phys. Rev. B 100, 075420 (2019).

26. 26.

Palacio-Morales, A., Mascot, E., Cocklin, S., Kim, H., Rachel, S. et al. Atomic-scale interface engineering of Majorana edge modes in a 2D magnet-superconductor hybrid system. Sci. Adv. 5, eaav6600 (2019).

27. 27.

Pöyhönen, K., Sahlberg, I., Westström, A. & Ojanen, T. Amorphous topological superconductivity in a Shiba glass. Nat. Commun. 9, 2103 (2018).

28. 28.

Nadj-Perge, S., Drozdov, I. K., Li, J., Chen, H. & Jeon, S. et al. Observation of Majorana fermions in ferromagnetic atomic chains on a superconductor. Science 346, 602 (2014).

29. 29.

Yin, J.-X., Wu, Z., Wang, J.-H., Ye, Z.-Y. & Gong, J. et al. Observation of a robust zero-energy bound state in iron-based superconductor Fe(Te,Se). Nat. Phys. 11, 543 (2015).

30. 30.

Fan, P., Yang, F., Qian, G., Chen, H., Zhang, Y.-Y. et al. Reversible transition between Yu-Shiba-Rusinov state and Majorana zero mode by magnetic adatom manipulation in an iron-based superconductor, https://arxiv.org/abs/arXiv:2001.07376.

31. 31.

Machida, T., Sun, Y., Pyon, S., Takeda, S. & Kohsaka, Y. et al. Zero-energy vortex bound state in the superconducting topological surface state of Fe(Se,Te). Nat. Mater. 18, 811 (2019).

32. 32.

Wang, Z., Rodriguez, J. O., Jiao, L., Howard, S. & Graham, M. et al. Evidence for dispersing 1D Majorana channels in an iron-based superconductor. Science 367, 104 (2020).

33. 33.

Pan, S. H., Hudson, E. W. & Davis, J. C. Vacuum tunneling of superconducting quasiparticles from atomically sharp scanning tunneling microscope tips. Appl. Phys. Lett. 73, 2992 (1998).

34. 34.

Rodrigo, J. G., Suderow, H. & Vieira, S. On the use of STM superconducting tips at very low temperatures. Eur. Phys. J. B 40, 483 (2004).

35. 35.

Franke, K. J., Schulze, G. & Pascual, J. I. Competition of superconducting phenomena and kondo screening at the nanoscale. Science 332, 940 (2011).

36. 36.

Yu, L. Bound state in superconductors with paramagnetic impurities. Acta Phys. Sin. 21, 75 (1965).

37. 37.

Shiba, H. Classical spins in superconductors. Prog. Theor. Phys. 40, 435 (1968).

38. 38.

Rusinov, A. Superconcductivity near a paramagnetic impurity. J. Exp. Theor. Phys. 9, 85 (1969).

39. 39.

Ruby, M., Pientka, F., Peng, Y., von Oppen, F. & Heinrich, B. W. et al. Tunneling processes into localized subgap states in superconductors. Phys. Rev. Lett. 115, 087001 (2015).

40. 40.

Bang, Y., Choi, H.-Y. & Won, H. Impurity effects on the ± s-wave state of the iron-based superconductors. Phys. Rev. B 79, 054529 (2009).

41. 41.

Kreisel, A., Nelson, R., Berlijn, T., Ku, W. & Aluru, R. et al. Towards a quantitative description of tunneling conductance of superconductors: Application to LiFeAs. Phys. Rev. B 94, 224518 (2016).

42. 42.

Kariyado, T. & Ogata, M. Single-impurity problem in iron-pnictide superconductors. J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 79, 16 (2010).

43. 43.

Tsai, W.-F., Zhang, Y.-Y., Fang, C. & Hu, J. Impurity-induced bound states in iron-based superconductors with s-wave coskx cosky pairing symmetry. Phys. Rev. B 80, 064513 (2009).

44. 44.

Gastiasoro, M. N., Hirschfeld, P. J. & Andersen, B. M. Impurity states and cooperative magnetic order in Fe-based superconductors. Phys. Rev. B 88, 220509 (2013).

45. 45.

Ng, T. K. & Avishai, Y. In-gap bound states induced by nonmagnetic impurities in two-band s± superconductors. Phys. Rev. B 80, 104504 (2009).

46. 46.

Beaird, R., Vekhter, I. & Zhu, J.-X. Impurity states in multiband s-wave superconductors: analysis of iron pnictides. Phys. Rev. B 86, 140507 (2012).

47. 47.

Ménard, G. C., Guissart, S., Brun, C., Leriche, R. T. & Trif, M. et al. Two-dimensional topological superconductivity in Pb/Co/Si(111). Nat. Commun. 8, 2040 (2017).

48. 48.

Garnier, M., Mesaros, A. & Simon, P. Topological superconductivity with deformable magnetic skyrmions. Commun. Phys. 2, 126 (2019).

49. 49.

Farinacci, L., Ahmadi, G., Reecht, G., Ruby, M. & Bogdanoff, N. et al. Tuning the coupling of an individual magnetic impurity to a superconductor: quantum phase transition and transport. Phys. Rev. Lett. 121, 196803 (2018).

50. 50.

Malavolti, L., Briganti, M., Hänze, M., Serrano, G. & Cimatti, I. et al. Tunable spin-superconductor coupling of Spin 1/2 vanadyl phthalocyanine molecules. Nano Lett. 18, 7955 (2018).

51. 51.

Balatsky, A. V., Vekhter, I. & Zhu, J.-X. Impurity-induced states in conventional and unconventional superconductors. Rev. Mod. Phys. 78, 373 (2006).

52. 52.

Wijnheijmer, A. P., Garleff, J. K., Teichmann, K., Wenderoth, M. & Loth, S. et al. Single Si dopants in GaAs studied by scanning tunneling microscopy and spectroscopy. Phys. Rev. B 84, 125310 (2011).

53. 53.

Battisti, I., Fedoseev, V., Bastiaans, K. M., de la Torre, A. & Perry, R. S. et al. Poor electronic screening in lightly doped Mott insulators observed with scanning tunneling microscopy. Phys. Rev. B 95, 235141 (2017).

54. 54.

Koyama, T. Comment on “Charge expulsion and electric field in superconductors”. Phys. Rev. B 70, 226503 (2004).

55. 55.

Sales, B. C., Sefat, A. S., McGuire, M. A., Jin, R. Y. & Mandrus, D. et al. Bulk superconductivity at 14 K in single crystals of Fe1+yTexSe1−x. Phys. Rev. B 79, 094521 (2009).

56. 56.

Song, S. Y., Martiny, J. H. J., Kreisel, A., Andersen, B. M. & Seo, J. Visualization of local magnetic moments emerging from impurities in Hund’s metal states of FeSe. Phys. Rev. Lett. 124, 117001 (2020).

57. 57.

Anderson, P. W. Theory of localized magnetic states in metals. J. Appl. Phys. 37, 1194 (1966).

58. 58.

Jellinggaard, A., Grove-Rasmussen, K., Madsen, M. H. & Nygård, J. Tuning yu-shiba-rusinov states in a quantum dot. Phys. Rev. B 94, 064520 (2016).

59. 59.

Kiršanskas, G., Goldstein, M., Flensberg, K., Glazman, L. I. & Paaske, J. Yu-Shiba-Rusinov states in phase-biased superconductor–quantum dot–superconductor junctions. Phys. Rev. B 92, 235422 (2015).

60. 60.

Žitko, R. Numerical subgap spectroscopy of double quantum dots coupled to superconductors. Phys. Rev. B 91, 165116 (2015).

61. 61.

Grove-Rasmussen, K., Steffensen, G., Jellinggaard, A., Madsen, M. H. & Žitko, R. et al. Yu-Shiba-Rusinov screening of spins in double quantum dots. Nat. Commun. 9, 2376 (2018).

62. 62.

Bauer, J., Oguri, A. & Hewson, A. C. Spectral properties of locally correlated electrons in a Bardeen–Cooper–Schrieffer superconductor. J. Phys. Condens. Matter 19, 486211 (2007).

63. 63.

Dynes, R. C., Narayanamurti, V. & Garno, J. P. Direct measurement of quasiparticle-lifetime broadening in a strong-coupled superconductor. Phys. Rev. Lett. 41, 1509 (1978).

64. 64.

Huang, H., Padurariu, C., Senkpiel, J., Drost, R., Yeyati, A. L. et al. Tunneling dynamics between superconducting bound states at the atomic limit. Nat. Phys. 16, 1227-1231. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41567-020-0971-0. (2020).

65. 65.

Jonckheere, T., Rech, J., Zazunov, A., Egger, R. & Yeyati, A. L. et al. Giant shot noise from majorana zero modes in topological trijunctions. Phys. Rev. Lett. 122, 97003 (2019).

66. 66.

Golub, A. & Horovitz, B. Shot noise in a Majorana fermion chain. Phys. Rev. B 83, 153415 (2011).

67. 67.

Bastiaans, K. M., Cho, D., Chatzopoulos, D., Leeuwenhoek, M. & Koks, C. et al. Imaging doubled shot noise in a Josephson scanning tunneling microscope. Phys. Rev. B 100, 104506 (2019).

68. 68.

Wiesendanger, R. Spin mapping at the nanoscale and atomic scale. Rev. Mod. Phys. 81, 1495 (2009).

69. 69.

Tang, H.-Z., Zhang, Y.-T. & Liu, J.-J. Photon-assisted tunneling through a topological superconductor with Majorana bound states. AIP Adv. 5, 127129 (2015).

Acknowledgements

We acknowledge J. de Bruijckere, J.F. Ge, M.H. Fischer, P.J. Hirschfeld, D.K. Morr, P. Simon, J. Zaanen, and H.S.J. van der Zant for fruitful discussions. This work was supported by the European Research Council (ERC StG SpinMelt) and by the Netherlands Organization for Scientific Research (NWO/OCW), as part of the Frontiers of Nanoscience programme, as well as through a Vidi grant (680-47-536). G.G. is supported by the Office of Basic Energy Sciences, Materials Sciences and Engineering Division, US Department of Energy (DOE) under contract number de-sc0012704. B.M.A. acknowledges support from the Independent Research Fund Denmark grant number DFF-8021-00047B. The Center for Quantum Devices is funded by the Danish National Research Foundation. D. Cho was supported by the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) grant funded by the Korea government (MSIT) (No. 2020R1C1C1007895 and 2017R1A5A1014862) and the Yonsei University Research Fund of 2019-22-0209. A.A. acknowledges the support of the Max Planck-POSTECH-Hsinchu Center for Complex Phase Materials, and financial support from the National Research Foundation (NRF) funded by the Ministry of Science of Korea (Grant No. 2016K1A4A01922028).

Author information

Authors

Contributions

D. Chatzopoulos, D. Cho, and K.M.B. performed the experiments and data analysis. D. Chatzopoulos, G.O.S., D.B., A.A., J.P., and B.M.A. performed the simulations. G.G. grew and characterized the samples. All authors contributed to the interpretation of the data and writing of the manuscript. M.P.A. supervised the project.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Milan P. Allan.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Peer review information Nature Communications thanks the anonymous reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work. Peer reviewer reports are available.

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

Chatzopoulos, D., Cho, D., Bastiaans, K.M. et al. Spatially dispersing Yu-Shiba-Rusinov states in the unconventional superconductor FeTe0.55Se0.45. Nat Commun 12, 298 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-020-20529-x

• Accepted:

• Published: