Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Long-distance spin-transport across the Morin phase transition up to room temperature in ultra-low damping single crystals of the antiferromagnet α-Fe2O3


Antiferromagnetic materials can host spin-waves with polarizations ranging from circular to linear depending on their magnetic anisotropies. Until now, only easy-axis anisotropy antiferromagnets with circularly polarized spin-waves were reported to carry spin-information over long distances of micrometers. In this article, we report long-distance spin-transport in the easy-plane canted antiferromagnetic phase of hematite and at room temperature, where the linearly polarized magnons are not intuitively expected to carry spin. We demonstrate that the spin-transport signal decreases continuously through the easy-axis to easy-plane Morin transition, and persists in the easy-plane phase through current induced pairs of linearly polarized magnons with dephasing lengths in the micrometer range. We explain the long transport distance as a result of the low magnetic damping, which we measure to be ≤ 10−5 as in the best ferromagnets. All of this together demonstrates that long-distance transport can be achieved across a range of anisotropies and temperatures, up to room temperature, highlighting the promising potential of this insulating antiferromagnet for magnon-based devices.


The ultra-fast magnetization dynamics of antiferromagnets (AFMs) are complex due to the multiple sublattices involved, and have so far been studied mostly by neutron scattering experiments1,2. The development of THz spectroscopy combined with the burgeoning field of antiferromagnetic spintronics3,4 has recently generated exciting predictions and first results on the potential exotic dynamics of antiferromagnetic magnons have emerged. Antiferromagnetic magnons can exhibit the full range of circular to linear polarization in collinear antiferromagnets5, and a finite magnon Hall angle is predicted in chiral antiferromagnets6. Theoretical work has also predicted the interaction between antiferromagnetic magnons and spin-textures7,8, by respective changes of their polarization and of the local Néel order. Ballistic9, diffusive10 and spin-superfluid regimes through magnon condensation11,12 have been predicted, and electrical signatures by spin–orbit coupling effects are expected13,14,15.

Experimental observations of these rich physics have started to emerge, with recent reports of long-distance spin-transport near room temperature in the easy-axis phase of hematite8,16 and at low temperatures in antiferromagnetic quantum Hall graphene17. However, the complex spin-transport features in collinear antiferromagnets are generally not indicative of the coherent transport regime although signatures have recently been claimed18. Furthermore, while the transport in easy-axis AFMs that is expected from the circular polarization of the magnons has been clearly observed16, the possibility to propagate long-distance spin-currents in the wide-spread class of collinear easy-plane antiferromagnets remains an open question in the emerging field of antiferromagnetic magnonics10. Finally, achieving long-distance room temperature spin-transport has not been achieved yet which is a prerequisite to integrate antiferromagnets in spintronic and magnonic devices.

Hematite, α-Fe2O3, is a model system to investigate the spin-transport regime of easy-axis antiferromagnets as we recently reported8,16 but the easy-axis phase is only present at low temperatures. Above the Morin temperature (TMorin = 260 K), undoped hematite single crystals undergo a transition from an easy-axis to an easy-plane AFM, due to a change of sign of its anisotropy field HA19, with a small sub-lattice canting due to its internal Dzyaloshinskii–Moriya interaction (DMI)20. One must notice that the Morin transition can disappear due to size effects in thin films and be recovered through doping21. A similar transition towards a canted easy-plane phase can be obtained at lower temperatures for sufficiently high fields in the spin-flop state20,22. In order to realize room temperature spin-transport, one needs to demonstrate the transport in the easy-plane phase. Hematite therefore represents a model system to simultaneously address and compare the origins of the magnonic transport in easy-axis and canted easy-plane antiferromagnets by making use of temperature and field cycling.

In this paper, we demonstrate that the easy-plane phase of the antiferromagnet hematite can transport spin-information over long distances at room temperature. As a function of temperature, the spin-transport length scale drops continuously. When going across the Morin transition there is no abrupt change but rather the transport length scale continuously changes with temperature. We associate this surprising behavior with current-induced correlated magnon pairs with a small difference of k vectors in combination with the ultra-low magnetic damping of hematite that we measure using electron paramagnetic resonance at frequencies of hundreds of gigahertz. Altogether we can explain the long-distance transport present in both the easy-axis and easy-plane phases and at elevated temperatures as required for applications.


Spin transport through the Morin transition

To study the role of the antiferromagnetic symmetry and anisotropy in the transport of antiferromagnetic magnons, we performed nonlocal measurements on a crystal of the antiferromagnet hematite using platinum stripes, parallel to the projection of the in-plane projection of the easy-axis (along the x-axis, sketch in Fig. 1a). To measure magnon transport, we inject a charge current through the Pt injector, which generates a transverse spin-current due to the spin-Hall Effect (SHE). An electron spin-accumulation builds up at the Pt/α-Fe2O3 interface (along y) resulting in the excitation of spin-polarized magnons for a parallel alignment of the antiferromagnetic order and the interfacial electron spin-accumulation. This nonequilibrium magnon population then diffuses away from the injector and is then absorbed by an electrically isolated Pt detector some distance away (0.5 to 10 μm). It is then converted to a charge current via the inverse SHE. This spin-bias signal can then be expressed as a nonlocal voltage Vel as previously established16.

Fig. 1: Spin transport through the Morin transition (TM).
figure 1

a Schematic of the nonlocal geometry of two electrically isolated Pt wires parallel to the in-plane projection of the easy axis. b Temperature dependence of the nonlocal spin signals for a magnetic field parallel to the platinum stripes (33 deg from the easy-axis). Error bars from counting statistic are smaller than the symbol size. c Top: The spin signal Vel is measured at the spin-flop field and approaches zero at low temperature, indicating a diffusive regime. Data obtained for an inter-stripe distance of 500 nm. Bottom: Spin-wave decay length (spin-diffusion length λ for T < TM and dephasing length L for T > TM) as a function of temperature for H applied along x at the spin-flop field (gray and red lines, respectively, correspond to fits with a magnon transport based on elliptically polarized spin waves (SWs) and on pairs of linearly polarized spin waves. The gray line would go to zero above the Morin transition due to the absence of elliptical spin waves. For modeling we used the following data: exchange field Hex = 1040 T, HDMI = 2.72 T, Han,in = 24 μT as in ref. 27).

While transport has so far been confined to the low temperature easy-axis phase, here we investigate the temperature dependence of the spin-transport signal through the Morin transition as shown in Fig. 1b. As we previously reported16, we observe at all temperatures below the Morin temperature (TM = 260 K) a peak of the spin-transport signal at the spin-flop field when the applied field leads to the Néel vector reorientation (n // y) and the softening of the magnetic systems closes the magnon gap. This divergence is less pronounced at lower temperatures for which the magnetic susceptibility and the spin-flop field are larger (about 8 T at 150 K22). The absence of detectable signal below 75 K indicates a diffusive transport process dominated by thermal magnons and no dominating spin superfluidity. At temperatures above TM, in the easy-plane phase, the peak is less pronounced and the amplitude of the signal decreases as seen in Fig. 1c.

In parallel, we also measure a reduction of the magnon spin-diffusion length λ as the temperature increases. This decrease is in contrast to the increase with temperature observed in ferrimagnet YIG23. We detect a spin-transport signal for distances larger than 500 nm between the injector and the detector up to 320 K allowing us to determine that the spin-transport length scales even above room temperature are still in the range of μm. These features highlight the change of the spin-transport properties of diffusive magnons between the easy-plane and easy-axis antiferromagnetic phases.

Spin transport in the canted easy-plane phase

To characterize the detailed magnon transport properties above the Morin temperature, and in particular identify whether the spin current is carried by the Néel vector or the weak canted moment, which are orthogonal to one another, we present in Fig. 2 the angular and field dependences of the spin signal in the canted easy-plane phase (sketch of Fig. 2a). When we apply a field along the x- or the z-axis, the Néel vector smoothly reorients within the easy-plane and orients perpendicular to the Pt stripes, i.e., along y, and saturates at a field of about 0.4 T. This small spin-flop field in the easy-plane arises from magneto-elastic interactions, which emerge above the Morin temperature24. This spin-flop field, associated with a 6th order anisotropy term, leads to a threefold symmetry in the easy-plane and to a non-zero frequency gap22. Such threefold symmetry prevents a full compensation of the anisotropy fields, and is detrimental to achieve potential spin-superfluid regimes in linear response12.

Fig. 2: Spin transport in the easy-plane phase.
figure 2

a Sketch of the x-oriented devices relatively to the (111) easy-plane. α is the (xy) angle between the applied field and the x-axis. β is the (yz) angle between the applied field and the y-axis. γ is the (xz) angle between the applied field and the x-axis. b Spin-transport signal for fields along the x, y, and z directions (black line corresponds to a fit based on phenomenological model, described in the text, based on correlated pairs of linear spin waves). ce Spin-transport signal in the α, β, and γ planes. Filled and open symbols correspond to an applied field of 0.5 and 8 T, respectively (shaded lines correspond to fits based on the phenomenological model based on pairs of linear spin waves. For modeling we used the following data: exchange field Hex = 1040 T, HDMI = 2.72 T, Han,in = 24 μT as in ref. 27). Error bars from counting statistic are smaller than the symbol size.

Above the spin-reorientation transition, the amplitude of the spin signal smoothly decreases when the field is applied along the x- and z-axes. If instead, the field is applied perpendicular to the stripes, the Néel order orients perpendicular to the electron spin-accumulation and no signal is observed (red curve in Fig. 2b). This indicates that the spin information is transported along the Néel order direction and not by the weak canted moment; the transport is thus of antiferromagnetic nature as found previously for the easy-axis phase. The moment due to the canting of the sublattices plays no significant role here. We confirm these observations using the angular dependence in the (xy), (yz), and (xz) planes as shown in Fig. 2c–e. The transport signal shows a maximum for H parallel to either x or z, while a minimum is observed for a magnetic field applied along y. At 0.5 T, the signal is nearly always maximal in the γ-plane (Fig. 2e) except at γ = −35 ± 5° (mod. 180°) for which the field is applied perfectly along the hard-axis (c-axis). In this latter case, the condition n parallel to the current polarization y is not fulfilled and no spin-current propagates. Considering the angular dependence of the signals shown in Fig. 2c–e, one can see that the easy-plane symmetry plays a crucial role in the properties of the spin-transport signal25. In the (xy) and (yz) planes, the oscillations keep their shape at 8 T but their amplitude strongly decreases as expected from the measurements using a single-field direction shown in Fig. 2b. The increase of the externally applied magnetic field has two main effects: first, the increasing field enhances the magnon gap, indicating that low energy magnons with small k vectors dominate the spin-transport signal. Second, it modifies the magnon polarization; above the Morin transition, the ellipticity of the magnons near the center of the Brillouin zone5, evolves towards a linear polarization with increasing temperature (due to the continuous increase in the hard-axis anisotropy).

Antiferromagnetic resonance and magnetic damping of hematite

Having established the possibility of spin transport in both the easy-axis and easy-plane phase of hematite, we need to understand the origin of the record spin-transport distances found in hematite. A key parameter of the magnon decay length in both the easy-axis and easy-plane antiferromagnetic phases is the magnetic damping. To obtain information about the magnetization dynamics of hematite and on this key parameter, we investigate the magnetization dynamics on a single crystal of hematite using magnetic resonance measurements from 120 GHz to 380 GHz26. From the dynamics of the probed uniform mode, we can extract information about the low k magnons which dominate the spin transport. In Fig. 3a, b, we show the frequency and linewidth dependence of the low frequency mode. The frequency dependence of the mode can be fitted using our calculations27. Owing to a wavelength smaller than the thickness of the crystal at high frequencies, we observe a broad peak at low magnetic field and multiple resonance peaks at higher magnetic fields (see inset of Fig. 3a). At magnetic fields below 4 T, the presence of magnetostatic modes leads to additional linewidth broadening that prevents us from extracting the magnetic damping (see “Methods”). Above this value, we can extract the resonance linewidth by measuring the average peak-to-peak distance of the resonances. This technique leads to large error bars as shown in Fig. 3b, but the results are in agreement with previous measurements using neutron2, terahertz28 and electron paramagnetic resonance29,30 spectroscopy. The results cannot be fitted well with the existing simple theories of antiferromagnetic resonances31, but we can deduce a magnetic damping with an upper limit of 10−5. This indicates that the magnetic damping of hematite α is of the same order as for YIG, the ferromagnetic material with so far the lowest reported magnetic damping of any magnetic compound.

Fig. 3: Magnetic resonance and relaxation.
figure 3

a Resonance frequency as a function of magnetic field for the low frequency mode of hematite at room temperature. Inset: resonance peak at 255 GHz for a 0.5 mm thick single crystal. b Linewidth as a function of frequency. The blue, brown and green points correspond to literature values from refs. 28,29,30. Shadow red and blue lines correspond to theoretical calculations from two models from Fink et al.31 with (α = 10−6) and without (α = 10−5) a dependence of AFM linewidth on the anisotropy. c Resonance field and linewidth as a function of temperature for an excitation frequency of 127 GHz. Error bars correspond to peak statistics.

We also performed magnetic resonance measurements for a fixed excitation frequency of 127 GHz as a function of temperature as shown in Fig. 3c. First, we observe that the linewidths at 200 K and 300 K are of similar order of magnitude showing that the magnetic damping is low in both the easy-plane and easy-axis phases. We also observe a small increase of the linewidth around TM, indicative of stronger dissipation processes at the transition which could arise from the minimum anisotropy at the Morin transition31.


To understand the observed spin transport resulting from the magnon properties in hematite, we develop a simple phenomenological model of magnon transport which defines a phase diagram with two regions (see Fig. S1 in Supplementary Information). Below the critical field Hcr(T) for the spin-flop, the equilibrium orientation of the Néel vector \({\mathbf{n}}^{\left( 0 \right)}\left( {\mathbf{H}} \right)\) varies depending on the magnetic field H (inset in Fig. S1 in Supplementary Information). In this region (both above and below the Morin transition), the magnon modes are polarized parallel or antiparallel to the equilibrium orientation of the Néel vector. Spin transport in this region is similar to spin transport of uniaxial antiferromagnets discussed in refs. 9,16. Above the critical field Hcr(T), the Néel vector \({\mathbf{n}}^{\left( 0 \right)}\left( {\mathbf{H}} \right)||\mathbf{ y} \bot {\mathbf{H}}\) is oriented perpendicular to the magnetic field, the magnon eigenmodes in the absence of a spin current are linearly polarized. So, to understand the observed spin-transport signal, we need to discuss the magnon spin transport in antiferromagnets with linearly polarized magnon modes.

To address this, we first analyze the magnon spectrum in the presence of spin-polarized currents emerging from the current distribution in the Pt injector electrode. Below the critical field Hcr(T) where the eigenmodes have an elliptical polarization, i.e., carry spin information, the current-induced anti-damping torque suppresses (enhances) the damping of the magnons polarized parallel (antiparallel) to the spin of current32. According to the fluctuation dissipation theorem33, this can be interpreted as a splitting of the effective temperature T± for spin-up and spin-down magnons34 and lead to the creation of a nonequilibrium spin-accumulation of magnons (see the details on the analytical modelling in the Supplementary Information):

$${\mathbf{\mu }} \propto {\boldsymbol{n}}^{\left( 0 \right)}\left( {{\mathbf{H}}_{{\mathrm{curr}}} \cdot {\mathbf{n}}^{\left( 0 \right)}} \right)\left[ {s_ + f\left( {\frac{{\omega _ + }}{T}} \right) + s_ - f\left( {\frac{{\omega _ - }}{T}} \right)} \right],$$

where \({\mathbf{H}}_{{\mathbf{curr}}}\) is the effective field parallel to the electron spin-accumulation and proportional to the current density j, f is the equilibrium Bose-Einstein distribution function and \(\omega _ \pm\) is the magnon frequency. The spin polarization of the magnon mode \(0 \le s_ \pm \le 1\) is related to its ellipticity5,32, and depends on the magnetic field: \(s_ \pm \propto {\mathbf{H}} \cdot {\mathbf{n}}^{\left( 0 \right)}\). The non-monotonic field dependence of the voltage \(V\left( H \right) \propto \mu _y\) shown in Fig. 1b. is thus explained by a field-induced variation of the ellipticity \(s_ \pm\) and the rotation of the Néel vector. This model also predicts the growth of the V(H) maximum with temperature once the temperature dependence of the magnetic easy-axis anisotropy \(H_{{\mathrm{an}}}(T)\)27 is taken into account, as shown in the top panel of Fig. 1c. by the gray line.

Above the critical field Hcr(T), below and above the Morin transition, the situation changes completely: the magnon modes are linearly polarized and the current-induced torques establish correlations between the linearly polarized magnon modes with orthogonal polarizations35. The pairs of two linearly polarized magnons with different frequencies, though coupled by current, carry no spin-angular momentum and do not contribute to spin transport. However, the pairs, whose wave vectors k satisfy the energy conservation relation, \(\omega _1^2 + c^2{\mathbf{k}}_1^2 = \omega _2^2 + c^2{\mathbf{k}}_2^2\), (see Fig. 4), generate a net nonequilibrium magnon spin-accumulation (1) with \(\omega _ + \to \sqrt {\omega _1^2 + c^2{\mathbf{k}}_1^2}\), \(s_ + = 1\), \(s_ - = 0\), where \(H_{{\mathrm{curr}}}\left( {{\mathbf{k}}_1 - {\mathbf{k}}_2} \right)\) corresponds to the space Fourier component of the current j(k1 – k2), ω1,2 to the gaps (k = 0) of the high frequency and low frequency magnon branches, c is the limiting velocity of magnons. These pairs thus carry spin information, which explains the presence of a non-zero spin-transport signal above the spin-flop field and in the easy-plane phase above the Morin transition.

Fig. 4: Magnon dispersion curves of the two magnon modes of an easy-plane antiferromagnet.
figure 4

a Low (close to the Morin transition) and b high anisotropy (far from the Morin transition, here +30 K29). The pairs of magnons which satisfy energy conservation have small (large) Δk for low (high) anisotropy. For the calculations, we use a limiting magnon velocity c = 5.104 m/s as estimated from the magnon dispersion of Martin et al.40.

Below the Morin transition, the spin-propagation length λ of magnons was measured at the spin-flop field, i.e., at the phase boundary Hcr(T) where the signal \(V_{{\mathrm{el}}}\) reaches a maximal value (Fig. 1b). The corresponding temperature dependence can be well fitted with the law \(\lambda \propto \sqrt {H_{{\mathrm{an}}}\left( T \right)/T}\), which correlates with the magnon spin-diffusion length \(\lambda _T \propto 1/\sqrt T\)9 as shown in the bottom panel of Fig. 1c. The additional factor \(\sqrt {H_{{\mathrm{an}}}\left( T \right)}\) can be attributed to the effect of the magnetic field, which stabilizes elliptically polarized states and whose value at the phase boundary Hcr(T) scales with \(H_{{\mathrm{an}}}\).

In the region above Hcr(T) and above the Morin transition, the characteristic decay length of the magnon is dominated by the dephasing-induced attenuation of the signal. This is also illustrated in Fig. 2b, which shows the field dependence V(H) at a fixed distance x from the injector electrode. Formally, the spatial dependence of the attenuated signal in the presence of dephasing follows the same exponential decay \(V\left( y \right) \propto {\mathrm{exp}}\left( { - \frac{y}{L}} \right)\) as in the case of diffusion. However, the characteristic length L depends on the difference \(\left| {{\mathbf{k}}_1 - {\mathbf{k}}_2} \right|\) and, correspondingly, on the difference of magnon frequencies. We thus establish that the expression of the characteristic dephasing length is:

$$L = \frac{{2\pi c^2k_y}}{{\omega _1^2 - \omega _2^2}},$$

where we assumed that Δkzky. One can notice that the magnetic field increases the splitting between the frequencies \(|\omega _1^2 - \omega _2^2|\), which explains how V(H) diminishes together with L(H). Furthermore, close to the Morin transition temperature, the values of the in-plane (\(H_{{\mathrm{an}} \bot }\)) and out-of-plane magnetic anisotropies (Han) are of the same order of magnitude. As a consequence, \(|\omega _1^2 - \omega _2^2| \propto |H_{{\mathrm{an}}} - H_{{\mathrm{an}} \bot }|\) is relatively small and L is relatively large (in the μm range). It should however be noted that \(H_{{\mathrm{an}} \bot }\) strongly increases above the Morin transition whilst Han remains nearly constant29. Far above the Morin transition, the frequency splitting is so strong even in absence of the magnetic field, that the dephasing length is below the experimental resolution. This result highlights the importance of having inplane and out-of-plane anisotropies of the same order to propagate spin information, which makes cubic antiferromagnets potential candidates in this purpose if they exhibit magnetic damping as low as hematite.

This long-distance spin-transport in both easy-axis and, in particular, easy-plane antiferromagnets and the observed ultra-low magnetic damping are remarkable features. Our findings broaden the class of materials in which one can use to propagate spin information36. Not only easy-axis antiferromagnets with intrinsic circularly polarized magnon modes can carry spin information, but also in easy-plane antiferromagnets one can electrically generate pairs of linearly polarized spin waves, which carry an effective circular polarization and thus a spin information. The dephasing length of these magnon pairs is strongly dependent on the difference of their k vectors and thus on the magnetic anisotropies of the antiferromagnet. One can also control the Δk of the two magnon branches by applying a magnetic field or by varying the temperature. Secondly, the combined transport and antiferromagnetic resonance measurements highlight the high potential of low damping antiferromagnetic insulators, both with easy-axis and easy-plane anisotropies, for their integration into magnonic and spintronic devices. Our findings potentially open the transport also to hematite thin films, which are intrinsically mostly in the easy plane phase37. Significant further advances in the fabrication of high-quality thin films with large domains are necessary to realize future devices8. More generally, insulating antiferromagnets can have magnetic damping as low as the best ferromagnets and can also transport spin information at room temperature over large length scales, which are both key features for magnonic devices.


Hematite crystal

Hematite crystals (5 × 5 × 0.5 mm) orientated such that the sample plane is (1\(\bar 1\)02), also known as r-plane, were commercially obtained. Before patterning the devices, the crystals were cleaned with acetone, isopropanol, and deionised water to remove any organic surface residues. The Morin temperature was obtained by magnetometry measurements using a superconducting quantum interference device and detecting the emerging canted moment at high temperatures.

Magneto-transport measurements

We patterned the nonlocal devices using electron beam lithography and the deposition of a 7 nm platinum layer by direct current sputtering in an Ar atmosphere to form the wires. The electrical contacts were patterned also by electron beam lithography and the deposition of a bilayer of Cr(6 nm)/Au(32 nm). The length of the Pt wires is 160 μm and their width is 350 nm wide. The separations between the wires range from 500 nm–10 μm. The sample was mounted to a piezo-rotating element in a superconducting magnet capable of fields up to 12 T and a temperature range from 10–320 K. Below 260 K, the resistivity of hematite is sufficiently large to avoid any leakage current between the platinum electrodes. At larger temperature, we performed rotation measurements to extract the spin signal and remove any small leakage current. The measured voltage was detected in the platinum detector wires using a nanovolt-meter, owing to the inverse spin-Hall effect creating a charge flow. This voltage was recorded as a function of the spatial separation, external field, applied bias current and angle between the charge current and the field. Electrical current polarity-dependences were used to disentangle the contribution of the injected spin current from that of the thermally induced spin current.

Magnetic resonance measurements

We characterized the magnetic resonance of a 0.5 mm thick single crystal of hematite using a setup that combines variable temperatures (5–290 K), strong magnetic fields (0–16 T) and high frequencies (127, 254, and 381 GHz)26. The measurement setup consists of a continuous-wave electron paramagnetic resonance spectrometer, the principle of which is based on a quasi-optical propagation of microwaves generated by solid sources (95–130 GHz) associated with multipliers. The radiation is propagated with mirrors and polarizers outside a cryostat, whereas a corrugated waveguide is used inside. The derivative of the absorption of the wave, obtained with the help of a field modulation, is detected by a bolometer. The applied continuous magnetic field is applied in the sample plane and the microwave field is at 45° from the surface normal. The low frequency measurements (below 50 GHz) were performed using coplanar waveguides and 40 GHz radiofrequency source in a Quantum Design 9 T superconducting magnet.

Analyzing the shape of the antiferromagnetic resonance measurements requires one to carefully disentangle the contribution from magnetostatic modes. In ferromagnetic crystals, the observation of magnetostatic modes in resonance measurements is a common feature that appears in materials with low magnetic damping like YIG38. At low magnetic fields, the magnetostatic modes lead to an artificial broadening of the FMR peak and large magnetic fields are required to resolve each peak individually. The situation is similar in antiferromagnetic crystals with an internal DMI field or in presence of external magnetic field39. The field difference ΔHm between the difference magnetostatic modes can be expressed as:

$$\Delta H_{\mathrm{m}} = - 4\pi f_mM_{\mathrm{s}}\frac{{\left( {H_{{\mathrm{res}}} + H_{{\mathrm{DM}}}} \right)}}{{H_{\mathrm{e}}}}$$

With fm a fraction of several tenths39. In hematite, we evaluate ΔHm to be around 2 mT at H = 0 and 10 mT at H = 4 T for the separation between the lowest magnetostatic modes. In order to resolve the intrinsic linewidth of hematite ΔHres, one requires ΔHm Hres or ΔHm Hres This condition is fulfilled only at high fields in the case of hematite. Then, resonance linewidths and fields were extracted by measuring the average peak-to-peak distance and center of the resonances.

Data availability

The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding authors upon reasonable request. Correspondence and requests for materials should be addressed to R.L. or M.K.


  1. 1.

    Hutchings, M. T. & Samuelsen, E. J. Measurement of spin-wave dispersion in NiO by inelastic neutron scattering and its relation to magnetic properties. Phys. Rev. B 6, 3447–3461 (1972).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Samuelsen, E. J. & Shirane, G. Inelastic neutron scattering investigation of spin waves and magnetic interactions in α-Fe2O3. Phys. Status Solidi B 42, 241–256 (1970).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Baltz, V. et al. Antiferromagnetic spintronics. Rev. Mod. Phys. 90, 015005 (2018).

    ADS  MathSciNet  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Jungwirth, T., Marti, X., Wadley, P. & Wunderlich, J. Antiferromagnetic spintronics. Nat. Nanotechnol. 11, 231–241 (2016).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Rezende, S. M., Azevedo, A. & Rodríguez-Suárez, R. L. Introduction to antiferromagnetic magnons. J. Appl. Phys. 126, 151101 (2019).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Mook, A., Göbel, B., Henk, J. & Mertig, I. Magnon transport in noncollinear spin textures: anisotropies and topological magnon Hall effects. Phys. Rev. B 95, 020401 (2017).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Tveten, E. G., Qaiumzadeh, A. & Brataas, A. Antiferromagnetic domain wall motion induced by spin waves. Phys. Rev. Lett. 112, 147204 (2014).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Ross, A. et al. Propagation length of antiferromagnetic magnons governed by domain configurations. Nano Lett. 20, 306–313 (2020).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Bender, S. A., Skarsvåg, H., Brataas, A. & Duine, R. A. Enhanced spin conductance of a thin-film insulating antiferromagnet. Phys. Rev. Lett. 119, 056804 (2017).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Rezende, S. M., Rodríguez-Suárez, R. L. & Azevedo, A. Diffusive magnonic spin transport in antiferromagnetic insulators. Phys. Rev. B 93, 054412 (2016).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Takei, S., Halperin, B. I., Yacoby, A. & Tserkovnyak, Y. Superfluid spin transport through antiferromagnetic insulators. Phys. Rev. B 90, 094408 (2014).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Qaiumzadeh, A., Skarsvåg, H., Holmqvist, C. & Brataas, A. Spin superfluidity in biaxial antiferromagnetic insulators. Phys. Rev. Lett. 118, 137201 (2017).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Cheng, R., Xiao, J., Niu, Q. & Brataas, A. Spin pumping and spin-transfer torques in antiferromagnets. Phys. Rev. Lett. 113, 057601 (2014).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Johansen, Ø. & Brataas, A. Spin pumping and inverse spin Hall voltages from dynamical antiferromagnets. Phys. Rev. B 95, 220408 (2017).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Li, J. et al. Spin current from sub-terahertz-generated antiferromagnetic magnons. Nature 578, 70–74 (2020).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Lebrun, R. et al. Tunable long-distance spin transport in a crystalline antiferromagnetic iron oxide. Nature 561, 222 (2018).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Stepanov, P. et al. Long-distance spin transport through a graphene quantum Hall antiferromagnet. Nat. Phys. 14, 967 (2018).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Yuan, W. et al. Experimental signatures of spin superfluid ground state in canted antiferromagnet Cr2O3 via nonlocal spin transport. Sci. Adv. 4, eaat1098 (2018).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Artman, J. O., Murphy, J. C. & Foner, S. Magnetic anisotropy in antiferromagnetic corundum-type sesquioxides. Phys. Rev. 138, A912–A917 (1965).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Moriya, T. Anisotropic superexchange interaction and weak ferromagnetism. Phys. Rev. 120, 91–98 (1960).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Ellis, D. S. et al. Magnetic states at the surface of alpha-Fe2O3 thin films doped with Ti, Zn, or Sn. Phys. Rev. B 96, 094426 (2017).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Elliston, P. R. & Troup, G. J. Some antiferromagnetic resonance measurements in α-Fe2O3. J. Phys. C. Solid State Phys. 1, 169 (1968).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Cornelissen, L. J., Shan, J. & van Wees, B. J. Temperature dependence of the magnon spin diffusion length and magnon spin conductivity in the magnetic insulator yttrium iron garnet. Phys. Rev. B 94, 180402 (2016).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Liebermann, R. C. & Banerjee, S. K. Magnetoelastic interactions in hematite: Implications for geophysics. J. Geophys. Res. 76, 2735–2756 (1971).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Wang, H. et al. Antiferromagnetic anisotropy determination by spin Hall magnetoresistance. J. Appl. Phys. 122, 083907 (2017).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Barra, A. L., Gatteschi, D. & Sessoli, R. High-frequency EPR spectra of a molecular nanomagnet: understanding quantum tunneling of the magnetization. Phys. Rev. B 56, 8192–8198 (1997).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Lebrun, R. et al. Anisotropies and magnetic phase transitions in insulating antiferromagnets determined by a Spin-Hall magnetoresistance probe. Commun. Phys. 2, 50 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Chou, S. G. et al. High-resolution terahertz optical absorption study of the antiferromagnetic resonance transition in hematite (α-Fe2O3). J. Phys. Chem. C. 116, 16161–16166 (2012).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Velikov, L. V. & Rudashevskii, E. G. Antiferromagnetic resonance in hematite in the weakly ferromagnetic state. Zh. Eksp. Teor. Fiz. 56, 1557–1564 (1969).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Searle, C. W. & Wang, S. T. Magnetic‐resonance properties of pure and titanium-doped hematite. J. Appl. Phys. 39, 1025–1026 (1968).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Fink, H. J. Resonance line shapes of weak ferromagnets of the α-Fe2O3 and NiF2 type. Phys. Rev. 133, 1322–1326 (1964).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Gomonay, O., Yamamoto, K. & Sinova, J. Spin caloric effects in antiferromagnets assisted by an external spin current. J. Phys. Appl. Phys. 51, 264004 (2018).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Kovalev, A. A. & Tserkovnyak, Y. Thermomagnonic spin transfer and Peltier effects in insulating magnets. EPL Europhys. Lett. 97, 67002 (2012).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    Gomonay, O. & Loktev, V. Spin torque antiferromagnetic nanooscillator in the presence of magnetic noise. Condens. Matter Phys. 15, 43703 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    Tatara, G. & Pauyac, C. O. Theory of spin transport through an antiferromagnetic insulator. Phys. Rev. B 99, 180405 (2019).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    J. Han et al. Birefringence-like spin transport via linearly polarized antiferromagnetic magnons. Nature Nano. 15, 563–568 (2020).

  37. 37.

    Fischer, J. et al. Large spin Hall magnetoresistance in antiferromagnetic α−Fe 2 O 3/Pt Heterostructures. Phys. Rev. Appl. 13, 014019 (2020).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  38. 38.

    Duncan, J. A., Storey, B. E., Tooke, A. O. & Cracknell, A. P. Magnetostatic modes observed in thin single-crystal films of yttrium iron garnet at Q-band frequencies. J. Phys. C. Solid State Phys. 13, 2079–2095 (1980).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  39. 39.

    Beeman, D. E. Magnetostatic modes in antiferromagnets and canted antiferromagnets. J. Appl. Phys. 37, 1136–1137 (1966).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  40. 40.

    Martin, T. P., Merlin, R., Huffman, D. R. & Cardona, M. Resonant two magnon Raman scattering in α-Fe2O3. Solid State Commun. 22, 565–567 (1977).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

Download references


R.L. acknowledges the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation program under the Marie Skłodowska-Curie grant agreements FAST number 752195. R.L., A.R. and M.K. acknowledge support from the Graduate School of Excellence Materials Science in Mainz (MAINZ) DFG 266, the DAAD (Spintronics network, Project No. 57334897), the ERC Synergy Grant 3D MAGIC No. 856538 and all groups from Mainz acknowledge that this work was funded by the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG, German Research Foundation) -SFB TRR 173 –268565370 (projects A01, A03, A11, B02, B11 and B12). R.L. and M.K. acknowledge financial support from the Horizon 2020 Framework Program of the European Commission under FET-Open grant agreement no. 863155 (s-Nebula). R.L., A.R., and M.K. acknowledge support from the DFG project number 423441604. O.G. and J.S. acknowledge the Alexander von Humboldt Foundation, the ERC Synergy Grant SC2 (No. 610115). This work was also supported by the Max Planck Graduate Center (MPGC). A.Q, A.B., M.K. were supported by the Research Council of Norway through its Centers of Excellence funding scheme, project number 262633 “QuSpin”. V.B. acknowledges financial support from the French national research agency (ANR) (Grant Number ANR-15-CE24-0015-01) and the bottom-up exploratory program of the CEA (Grant Number PE-18P31-ELSA).

Author information




R.L. and M.K. proposed and supervised the project. R.L. and A.R. performed the transport experiments. R.L., U.E., V.B., and A.-L.B. performed the magnetic resonance measurements. A.R. patterned the samples. R.L., O.G., A.R. analyzed the data. O.G. performed the analytical calculations with inputs from R.L., M.K., A.Q., J.S., and A.B., R.L., O.G., A.R., and M.K. wrote the paper. All authors commented on the manuscript.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to R. Lebrun or M. Kläui.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Peer review information Nature Communications thanks the anonymous reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work.

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Lebrun, R., Ross, A., Gomonay, O. et al. Long-distance spin-transport across the Morin phase transition up to room temperature in ultra-low damping single crystals of the antiferromagnet α-Fe2O3. Nat Commun 11, 6332 (2020).

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI:

Further reading


By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.


Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing