Meron-like topological spin defects in monolayer CrCl3


Noncollinear spin textures in low-dimensional magnetic systems have been studied for decades because of their extraordinary properties and promising applications derived from the chirality and topological nature. However, material realizations of topological spin states are still limited. Employing first-principles and Monte Carlo simulations, we propose that monolayer chromium trichloride (CrCl3) can be a promising candidate for observing the vortex/antivortex type of topological defects, so-called merons. The numbers of vortices and antivortices are found to be the same, maintaining an overall integer topological unit. By perturbing with external magnetic fields, we show the robustness of these meron pairs and reveal a rich phase space to tune the hybridization between the ferromagnetic order and meron-like defects. The signatures of topological excitations under external magnetic field also provide crucial information for experimental justifications. Our study predicts that two-dimensional magnets with weak spin-orbit coupling can be a promising family for realizing meron-like spin textures.


The quest for low-dimensional (\(d \le 2\)) magnetic materials and their unique topological spin textures can be traced back to the last century. Particularly, for two-dimensional (2D) magnetic systems, different ways to break the continuous rotational spin symmetry may induce different spontaneous magnetic orders by violating the Mermin–Wagner theorem1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9. For example, with the presence of a specific easy axis in 2D structures, the long-range ferromagnetic (FM) order can sustain at finite temperature via opening a magnon gap to resist thermal agitations3,5,6,7,8,9,10. This is evidenced by recent realizations of Ising-like 2D magnets, such as monolayer (ML) FM insulators CrI3 and Cr2Ge2Te6, and multilayer magnetic topological insulator MnBi2Te4, etc.6,7,11,12,13,14, which have ignited tremendous research interests to date.

Unlike the easy-axis anisotropy, an easy-plane anisotropy yields a residual SO(2) symmetry that usually prohibits the formation of a spontaneous long-range magnetic order at finite temperature1,2,4. On the other hand, such a residual in-plane symmetry provides ample space for realizing the quasi-ordered states that evolve with various topological defects. A known example is the topological vortex/antivortex pairs with an algebraically decaying correlation, which can be described by the Berezinskii–Kosterlitz–Thouless (BKT) theory based on the 2D XY model4,15. However, spins of realistic materials own a three-dimensional (3D) degree of freedom, making them different from the ideal XY model, in which the spin is confined within the 2D easy plane. Such an extra degree of freedom gives hope to many nontrivial topological spin states, such as skyrmions, magnetic bubbles, and merons5,16,17,18,19,20,21.

These noncollinear spin textures can be induced by many mechanisms, such as antisymmetric exchange interactions (Dzyaloshinskii-Moriya (DM)), magnetic anisotropy, and magnetic dipolar couplings5. Particularly, isotropic easy-plane magnetized 2D materials can host magnetic vortices and antivortices. This type of topological defects were predicted to have curling magnetizations lying within the easy plane but pointing out of the plane around the core regions of vortices/antivortices5. In condensed matter physics, such a topological structure is referred to as a meron, which corresponds to one half of a skyrmion and is stabilized via pairs22,23,24. Merons have already been observed in various coupled magnetic discs and magnetic interfaces18,23,24,25,26,27. For example, meron textures have been observed in thin plates of chiral-lattice magnet Co8Zn9Mn3 and α-Fe2O3/Co heterostructure film at room temperature25,27. Recently, there was also a report about creating and stabilizing meron pairs in a continuous Py film, which inherits the in-plane anisotropy by local vortex imprinting from a Co disk28. However, besides magnetic discs and interfaces, a pristine single-atomic thin material that exhibits such topological defects is still absent. More importantly, the understanding of these topological defects, their interactions, and the profound relations with fundamental quantum phenomena, such as superfluidity and superconductivity, are yet unclear and forging ahead29,30.

In this work, we find that, because of the weak spin-orbit coupling (SOC), the magnetic dipolar interaction induced magnetic shape anisotropy (MSA) can overcome the magneto-crystalline anisotropy (MCA) to evince an easy-plane, isotropic magnetic polarization in ML CrCl3. By employing an anisotropic Heisenberg model with magnetic dipole-dipole (D-D) interactions and exchange interactions extracted from first-principles simulations, we predict the existence of meron-like topological defects in ML CrCl3. Moreover, beyond pairs of vortecies and antivortecies, higher-order states involved with more than two merons are also observed in our simulations, forming complex topological excitations. Finally, to guide experiments, we show that merons are robust against external fields, and the rich hybridization between merons and the FM order can be tuned via external magnetic fields.


Easy-plane anisotropy in ML CrCl3

The easy-plane anisotropy is crucial for the formation of topological defects5,31. Usually, the anisotropy is described by the magnetic anisotropy energy (MAE), which characterizes the dependence of energy on the orientation of magnetization. There are two origins of MAE owing to the relativistic effect. The first is MCA that is mainly determined by the SOC. The second is the shape anisotropy related to MSA that is originated from the Breit modification of the relativistic two-electron energy. MSA is ascribed to the classical magnetic D-D interactions32,33:

$$E_{{\mathrm{D}} - {\mathrm{D}}} \,=\, - \frac{1}{2}\frac{{\mu _0}}{{4{\uppi}}}{\sum} {_{i \ne j}} \frac{1}{{r_{ij}^3}}\left[ {{\mathbf{m}}_i \cdot {\mathbf{m}}_j - 3\frac{{\left( {{\mathbf{r}}_{ij} \cdot {\mathbf{m}}_i} \right)\left( {{\mathbf{r}}_{ij} \cdot {\mathbf{m}}_j} \right)}}{{r_{ij}^2}}} \right],$$

where \(\mu _0\) is the vacuum permeability, and \({\mathbf{m}}_i\), \({\mathbf{m}}_j\) are the local magnetic moments with a spatial separation of \({\mathbf{r}}_{ij}\). Such a D-D interaction usually favors magnetization along the elongated direction of materials. For thin films, this provides an origin of in-plane anisotropy5,32. Typically, the shape anisotropy can be added as a posterior term after the first-principles electronic calculations33. In most materials, the magnetic D-D interaction is small compared with the MCA interaction34. However, it may play an important role in weak-MCA magnets with negligible SOC. This leads us to study ML CrCl3, which is known for its weak SOC33. 2D CrCl3 has been recently fabricated35,36,37, and the XY physics was discussed in a recent experiment on ML CrCl338.

According to Eq. (1), the MSA energy is calculated by \(E_{{\mathrm{MSA}}} \,=\, E_\parallel ^{{\mathrm{D}} - {\mathrm{D}}} - E_ \bot ^{{\mathrm{D}} - {\mathrm{D}}}\) with the magnetization rotating from the in-plane direction (\(\parallel\)) to the out-of-plane direction (\(\bot\)). The MCA energy is calculated by \(E_{{\mathrm{MCA}}} \,=\, E_\parallel ^{{\mathrm{SOC}}} - E_ \bot ^{{\mathrm{SOC}}}\), which is obtained from first-principles density functional theory (DFT) + U calculations. The calculation setups and convergence tests are included in the Method section. The schematic plot of the FM anisotropy energy (taking the out-of-plane direction as a reference) is presented in Fig. 1(a). Because of the competition between MCA and MSA, the overall MAE of ML CrCl3 is about −34 μeV (the negative sign means a preferred in-plane polarization). Thus, the zero-temperature ground-state magnetization in ML CrCl3 is in-plane (Fig. 1(c)). Besides, the in-plane MAE is nearly perfectly isotropic, and the variation is <0.1 μeV. In this work, we choose the Hubbard U and Hund exchange J as 2.7 eV and 0.7 eV, respectively, which were used in published literatures and provided good agreements with available measurements3,39,40,41. Moreover, we have checked other choices of U and J within a reasonable range and confirmed that they do not qualitatively affect the preferred in-plane MAE and subsequent topological spin textures of ML CrCl3 (see the Supplementary Note 1 and Supplementary Table 1). These results also agree with recent calculations and measurements33,35,36,37.

Fig. 1: Magnetic anisotropy energy (MAE) of ML CrCl3 and CrI3.

a, b MAE map (taking the out-of-plane FM state as a reference) for ML CrCl3 and CrI3, respectively. The figures in the middle panel are extracted from the longitude and latitude from (a) (as indicated by the dashed line), to amplify the variation from the out-of-plane direction to the in-plane direction and the nearly perfect isotropy within the material plane. The inset figure is the atomic structure of chromium trihalides. The red hexagon indicates the honeycomb structure formed by magnetic Cr atoms. c, d Are the schematic plots of the preferred magnetization directions for ML CrCl3 and CrI3, respectively.

For the purpose of comparison, we have done calculations for ML CrI3, which has a large SOC. Its MAE is around 300 μeV, resulting in a known Ising-like out-of-plane magnetic order3,6,42,43. The corresponding anisotropy energy and preferred zero-temperature out-of-plane magnetization are schematically plotted in Fig. 1(b, d). The calculated anisotropy energies and magnetic coupling constants are listed in Table 1 for these widely studied chromium trihalides, and ML CrCl3 is the most promising structure to realize the in-plane ground-state polarization. Moreover, the relationship between the MCA energy and SOC strength is discussed in the Supplementary Note 2 to show that SOC is the main mechanism in deciding the MCA energy.

Table 1 Anisotropy energies and magnetic coupling strengths of ML CrX3 (X = I, Br, Cl).

Low-temperature magnetic phase

To explore the magnetic phase at low temperature, we have employed a classical Monte Carlo (MC) simulation based on an anisotropic Heisenberg model with parameters from first-principles simulations. This Heisenberg Hamiltonian is essentially an approximation to the many-body electronic Hamiltonian in a localized basis, which only contains the spin degree of freedom44. This method provides good agreements of the Curie temperature (Tc) for ML CrI3 and CrBr3 with experiments3,9,41,44,45. More specifically, we add the magnetic D-D interaction (\(E_{{\mathrm{D}} - {\mathrm{D}}}\)) from Eq. (1):

$${\cal{H}} \, = \, \mathop {\sum }\limits_i A\left( {S_i^{\mathrm{z}}} \right)^2 + \mathop {\sum }\limits_{ < i,j > } \frac{1}{2}\left( {\lambda _1S_i^{\mathrm{z}}S_j^{\mathrm{z}} + J_1\,{\mathbf{S}}_i \cdot {\mathbf{S}}_j} \right) \\ \!+ \mathop {\sum }\limits_{ \ll i,j \gg } \frac{1}{2}\left( {\lambda _2S_i^{\mathrm{z}}S_j^{\mathrm{z}} + J_2{\mathbf{S}}_i \cdot {\mathbf{S}}_j} \right) + E_{{\mathrm{D}} - {\mathrm{D}}}+ \mathop {\sum }\limits_i {\mathbf{B}} \cdot {\mathbf{S}}_i,$$

where A describes the easy-axis single-ion anisotropy, \(\lambda _{1,2}\) and \(J_{1,2}\) represent the anisotropic and isotropic exchange couplings up to the next nearest neighbors, and \({\mathbf{B}}\) is the external magnetic field.

The details of extracting those coefficients from first-principles simulations are presented in the Method section.

We begin with the intrinsic ML CrCl3 without an external field. The evolution of the averaged magnetic moment with temperature for ML CrCl3 is presented in Fig. 2(a). We find that the out-of-plane magnetization (the blue-dotted line Mz) is almost completely quenched. Surprisingly, the in-plane magnetization (the red diamond Min) with large fluctuations emerges even after the result is averaged over 25 ensembles. In contrast to CrCl3, as shown in Fig. 2(b), ML CrI3 exhibits a normal Ising-like out-of-plane magnetism with negligible fluctuations, and the in-plane magnetization is always zero. A sharp phase transition is observed around 42 K for ML CrI3, which is close to the measured Curie temperature of 45 K6.

Fig. 2: Monte Carlo simulations of ML CrCl3 and CrI3.

a, b are the MC simulated magnetization versus temperature of ML CrCl3 and CrI3, respectively. The inset of (a) represents the averaged (blue-red line) and single-round (green dotted line) in-plane magnetic polarization of ML CrCl3. c, d The spin-spin correlation function of ML CrCl3 and CrI3. e, f The averaged in-plane magnetic polarization at T = 3 K for different D-D interaction truncations and different system sizes. The error bars are the standard deviation.

The inset of Fig. 2(a) further addresses the substantial fluctuations of the in-plane magnetization by comparing the statistically averaged in-plane magnetic moment with a single-round simulation. Importantly, for a single-round simulation, there is no obvious trend of the evolution of the in-plane polarization even between adjacent temperatures. Such a remarkable randomness strongly indicates the existence of a weak polarized state or a quasi-ordered phase, e.g., the vortex/antivortex states described by BKT physics4,15,46. The detailed comparison of averaged magnetization for ML CrCl3 and CrI3 with and without D-D interactions can be found in the Supplementary Note 3.

We have also checked the potential existence of quasi-order in ML CrCl3 by analyzing the spin-spin correlation functions, which is an effective way to identify orders15,47. In Fig. 2(c), the spin correlation of ML CrCl3 exhibits a quasi-long-range decay to zero at a low temperature (4 K) and an exponential decay to zero at a high-temperature (12 K) that is within the paramagnetic (PM) phase. These behaviors indicate that (1) there is no long-range order in ML CrCl3; (2) quasi orders may exist at low temperature because of the algebraic-like decaying correlation function. On the other hand, ML CrI3 exhibits a normal FM behavior in Fig. 2(d): the spin correlation exponentially decays to a nonzero value at 40 K because of the long-range FM order while it exponentially decays to zero at 48 K because of the PM phase.

In the following, by further analyzing the real-space arrangement of local magnetic moments as obtained through MC simulations, we confirm the topological vortex/antivortex type of defects within a 3D spin space. Figure 3(a–c) present the real-space magnetic moments at different temperatures. At low temperatures (Fig. 3(a, b)), we can identify the vortex/antivortex type of topological spin defects, which are marked by the ovals. At higher temperature (Fig. 3(c)), the spin structures disappear. Importantly, the numbers of vortex and antivortex defects are always the same, maintaining an overall integer topological unit. The chirality of topological pairs is indicated by the blue (vortex type) or red (antivortex type) part of the ovals. In addition, we have plotted the corresponding relative phase maps, which are used in experiments to identify spin textures48,49. In Fig. 3(d–f), the phase maps clarify the chirality of topological defects at core regions.

Fig. 3: Snapshots of Monte Carlo simulations of ML CrCl3.

ac Top views of the real-space magnetic moments from snapshots of MC simulations under different temperatures. The blue and red part of the ovals indicate the vortex and antivortex type meron defects, respectively. df are phase maps of in-plane magnetic moment component of (ac). The schematic spin directions and the connections between defects are drawn to clarify the vortex/antivortex type meron and the higher-order excitations. g, i, j Are enlarged views of the specific defect pairs and the rectangular area from (ac), respectively. h Side view of (g) with an enlarged z-axis ratio (10:1).

At low temperature (0.25 K), we find that these vortex (antivortex) type spin defects can be connected with neighbor alternative antivortex (vortex) type defects via a spin flux closure as indicated by the dashed line in Fig. 3(d). The enlarged Fig. 3(g) provides a clear micro-structure diagram of those topological defects. Interestingly, unlike the strict XY model where spin rotator is constrained within the 2D XY plane, the topological structures in ML CrCl3 contain 3D information, and this 3D spin effect is particularly significant around the core regions of the topological structures. As seen from the side view in Fig. 3(h), the magnetic moments around cores point out of the plane and form alterable spin hills26,28,49,50,51. Compared with the vortex and antivortex pairs in the XY-model, whose free energy mainly comes from the core regions4,15, the benefit of forming such 3D spin texture is manifest by avoiding large swirl angles around the cores of defects and, hence, lowering the system energy. Meanwhile, our simulation does not display any correlation between the magnetic moment swirling and the direction of the central spin hill. This agrees with the experimental observations that all four possible up/down combinations of paired meron-core polarities show up with nearly equal probabilities28.

Such topological defects have been referred to as merons, which have a \(\pm\, 1/2\) skyrmion charge5,23,52 and are similar to experimental observations18,23,24,25,26. This is a material analogy to a solution of the Yang–Mills theory, in which merons as described in the context of quark confinement can only exist in pairs owing to the one half of topological charge carried22,23,52,53. This character agrees with the equal numbers of vortex/antivortex defects observed in our simulations. Particularly, because of the pairing character of these topological spin defects, it is expected that doped free carriers could be intrinsically spin-polarized, and the transport of charged meron pairs might be dispersionless at low temperature54,55,56. Although those dynamic behaviors and quantitative interactions between merons are beyond the scope of this study, they would be interesting topics for future studies57,58,59.

Beyond meron pairs, our MC simulations reveal more complicated spin textures, such as the higher-order states involved more than two merons. As indicated in Fig. 3(a, d), some pairs of vortex/antivortex type merons are found to be anti-parallelly aligned with each other at low temperature, forming “quadrupole-like” topological excitations57,60. The presence of these hierarchical excitations indicates that, although the classical MC treatment does not take into account the quantum nature of spins, it does include the correlations of magnetic moments from the Heisenberg model9. (see Supplementary Fig. 4 for more examples of coupled meron pairs).

As temperature increases, those higher-order excitations are firstly annihilated by thermal fluctuations as indicated by the snapshot at 3.25 K in Fig. 3(b, e). On the other hand, the relatively robust pairing between vortex/antivortex type merons still persists, although thermal energy blurs the topological structures and makes them harder to be recognized in Fig. 3(e). Finally, at the higher temperature (~12 K), the paired merons totally melt, as shown in Fig. 3(c, f). The system becomes a disordered, PM phase with an exponentially decaying spin-spin correlation, which agrees with Fig. 2(c).

There are a few important mechanisms that are crucial for understanding the simulation results. First, we clarify the role of D-D interactions in generating meron-like spin textures. It is known that D-D interactions complicate system behaviors due to its nonlocal character and weakened singularities of the longitudinal mode of spin waves61,62,63. For 3D spins in ML CrCl3, D-D interactions mainly impact the MAE and introduce the preferred in-plane ground-state polarization. This is evidenced by the similar averaged magnetic moments calculated with different truncations of D-D interactions in Fig. 2(e). In the above simulations, we truncate the D-D interaction with a cutoff radius around 31 Å, as adopted in previous studies50,64. When the truncation radius increases from 15 Å to 52 Å, the statistically averaged value of magnetic moment at a certain temperature (T = 3 K) does not change essentially. Moreover, we find that the residual D-D interaction beyond a 31 Å truncation contributes <5% to the total MSA energy. Thus, the overall D-D interaction energy is, at least, an order of magnitude smaller than the energy from the isotropic exchange interaction J. As a result, except at extremely low temperature, the residual energy due to the D-D interaction truncation shall not qualitatively affect the spin textures of our studied systems. It is worth mentioning that our simulation cannot give accurate asymptotical behaviors approaching zero temperature due to the exponentially increasing simulation time, but this limit does not affect the main results of this work.

The simulation-size effect also needs to be considered. As Bramwell and Holdsworth discussed, a spontaneous magnetization could show up in a finite-size XY model owing to the suppression of Goldstone modes that usually destroy ferromagnetism63,65. A similar behavior could happen in 3D spin cases. As shown in Fig. 2(f) at 3 K, when the simulation size is not big enough (less than ~400 Å), the averaged magnetic moment of ML CrCl3 remains nearly a constant and does not exhibit large fluctuations, resembling the typical FM order. This also agrees with previous anisotropic Heisenberg-model studies64,66 on planar phases of 2D lattices, in which only the planar FM type curve was observed due to small simulation sizes. On the other hand, when the simulation size is significantly larger than that of meron pairs (~ 200 Å estimated from Fig. 3(a)), quasi orders start to show up because the system is large enough to hold meron-pairs. Particularly, with simulation size increasing, owing to the geometric features and growing density of merons, the averaged magnetization is expected to gradually decrease. This is what we observed in Fig. 2(f): when the system size increases, the averaged in-plane magnetic moment of ML CrCl3 (the deep blue line with red circles) decreases with large fluctuations. In contrast, the magnetic polarization of Ising-like ML CrI3 (the green line with light blue circles) does not depend on the system size, showing a normal FM state. Therefore, we conclude that a finite-size simulation can capture those meron pairs if the system size is significantly larger than that of merons. In other words, larger systems can hold more meron pairs but do not change the existence of the meron-like phase.

Finally, we also check the proximity effect from substrates, such as the widely used hexagonal boron nitride (h-BN). We do not find significant modifications to the meron states when ML CrCl3 is attached to h-BN, as shown in the Supplementary Table 2, Supplementary Fig. 3, and Supplementary Note 4. This verifies the feasibility of experimental realization for our theoretical predictions.

Response to external field

It is highly motivated to further investigate the response of the topologically paired merons to an external static magnetic field, which has been widely employed to study magnetic properties of materials6,7,35,37. As discussed above, the polarization direction of the local magnetic moments is crucial for determining the existence of the meron phases. As a result, a magnetic field applied along different directions is expected to induce different responses. First, we apply a small in-plane magnetic field (70 Gs), and the results are shown in Fig. 4(a). At low temperature (below 2 K), the magnetic moment is close to the saturated value (3 μB/Cr), and the fluctuation is substantially quenched, indicating a well-defined FM order. This is confirmed by Fig. 4(c, g), in which both the real-space magnetic moment distribution and projected magnetic component along the external-field direction show a FM order. This suggests that the applied in-plane magnetic field breaks the in-plane isotropy, forming a preferred polarization direction, which stabilizes the FM order. Interestingly, as temperature goes up, the magnetic polarization decreases, and larger fluctuation accompanies. In the real-space snapshot (Fig. 4(d)), meron pairs emerge. Those thermally excited topological defects are embedded in the aligned spin sea, which is tilted along the direction of the external field. Figure 4(d, h) provide a physics picture analogy of spin distributions in the real space and projected space. The latter can be directly compared with the experimentally observed figure format48,49.

Fig. 4: Response of the spin structures to external magnetic field.

a, b Magnetic polarization versus temperature under parallel and perpendicular external magnetic fields, respectively. The different background colors in (a) indicate different magnetic states. cf Real-space magnetic moments under the marked temperatures in (a, b). The lower panels (gj) are the corresponding projection components of local magnetic moments along external field directions (parallel and perpendicular to the material plane, respectively) from (cf). The error bars are the standard deviation.

We then explore the case where the applied magnetic field is perpendicular to the material plane. If the out-of-plane magnetic field is below a critical value (\(B_ \bot ^{{\mathrm{crit}}} \approx 0.2{\mathrm{T}}\)), although it is not strong enough to completely govern the preferred magnetization direction, the local magnetic moments are no longer perfectly within the material plane. Consequently, we observe a net averaged magnetization along the out-of-plane direction. In this weak magnetic field situation, the topological meron pairs may be preserved. Take \(B_ \bot = 0.1{\mathrm{T}}\) as an example shown in Fig. 4(b). At low temperature, an averaged out-of-plane magnetization shows up with the help of external field (the orange-dotted curve Mz). Meanwhile, the in-plane magnetic moment (the red-dotted curve Mxy) exhibits large fluctuations, indicating the existence of excited merons. This is evidenced by both the real-space and projected component plots of the magnetic moments in Fig. 4(e, i). The hot spots in the projected component figure indicate the core regions of merons, which correspond to the previously discussed spin hills at meron cores. When the temperature reaches 10 K, the averaged in-plane magnetization approaches zero. On the other hand, the out-of-plane magnetization is preserved, as shown in Fig. 4(f, j). This is another type of hybridization between FM and meron states. Moreover, the reason for the abnormal elevation of out-of-plane FM polarization with increasing temperature at around 10 K is that the D-D interaction is more sensitive to the arrangements of adjacent magnetic moments than the on-site Zeeman energy provided by the external field.


In summary, our studies show that the overall isotropic in-plane magnetized 2D material such as ML CrCl3 could provide the opportunity for generating meron-type topological defects without involving any other interactions. This would give hope to realizing topological spin structures in a much broader range of materials with weak SOC, such as CrF3. Meanwhile, these meron-like topological spin defects may shed light on the understanding of the recently observed suppressed magnetic ordering in ML NiPS3, an AFM easy-plane anisotropy material67. In addition to the previously studied Josephson junction arrays or superfluid helium systems.15,29,54, these meron-like pairs may provide an alternative way to study the exotic relations between topological spin textures and quantum critical phenomena, including the superfluidity and superconducting behaviors, in pristine 2D magnetic systems.


Density functional theory (DFT) calculations

The DFT calculations are performed within the generalized gradient approximation using the Perdew–Burke–Ernzerhof functional as implemented in the Vienna Ab initio Simulation Package68. A plane-wave basis set with a kinetic energy cutoff of 450 eV and a 5 × 5 × 1 k-point sampling is adopted for a 2 × 2 × 1 supercell to mimic different magnetic configurations for extracting magnetic interaction constants. The k-point grid is 12 × 12 × 1 for a 2 × 2 × 1 supercell. The vacuum distance is set to be 20 Å between adjacent layers to avoid spurious interactions. The van der Waals interaction is included by the DFT-D2 method69, and SOC is considered. We choose the Hubbard U = 2.7 eV and Hund J = 0.7 eV for Cr3+ ions. The structure is relaxed until the force converges within 0.01 eV/Å. The optimal lattice constant is 6.01 Å, which is close to the bulk monoclinic structure lattice constant 6.06 Å70.

Determination of the Heisenberg Hamiltonian coefficients

We obtain the magnetic interaction coefficients of the anisotropic Heisenberg model Hamiltonian (Eq. (2)) by calculating the total energies of different magnetic configurations. We consider the FM and Néel antiferromagnetic (AFM) configurations. The corresponding energies for a unit cell are

$$E_{{\mathrm{FM}}/{\mathrm{AFM}}}^{{\mathrm{out}}} \,=\, E_0 + \left( {2A \pm 3\lambda _1 \pm 3J_1 + 6\lambda _2 + 6J_2} \right)\left| {\mathbf{S}} \right|^2,$$
$$E_{{\mathrm{FM}}/{\mathrm{AFM}}}^{{\mathrm{in}}} \,=\, E_0 + \left( { \pm 3J_1 + 6J_2} \right)\left| {\mathbf{S}} \right|^2,$$

in which two magnetic orientations (in-plane and out-of-plane) are calculated to determine the anisotropic coupling constants. Moreover, we flip the magnetic moment of a Cr3+ cation in the 2 × 2 × 1 supercell to realize more magnetic configurations (the energies are normalized to one unit cell).

$$E_{{\mathrm{flip}}}^{{\mathrm{out}}} \,=\, E_0 + \left( {2A + \frac{3}{2}\lambda _1 + \frac{3}{2}J_1 + 3\lambda _2 + 3J_2} \right)\left| {\mathbf{S}} \right|^2$$
$$E_{{\mathrm{flip}}}^{{\mathrm{in}}} \,=\, E_0 + \left( {\frac{3}{2}J_1 + 3J_2} \right)\left| {\mathbf{S}} \right|^2.$$

As a result, we obtain six equations, which are used to solve for the five magnetic interaction coefficients in Eq. (1) and the reference energy (\(E_0\)). The extracted coefficients and corresponding magnetic anisotropy energies for CrX3 (X = Cr, Br, I) are summarized in the Table 1.

MC simulations

Based on the Hamiltonian Eq. (2), we perform MC simulations via the Metropolis algorithm on 2D hexagonal lattices with a size of 160 × 160 unit cells (if not particularly specified), which contain 51,200 magnetic moments. The periodic boundary condition is implemented. All magnetic moments are set to along the out-of-plane direction at the initial state to mimic experimental cooling conditions with the help of external field. We run for \(5.12 \times 10^9\) MC steps (\(10 \times 10^5\) steps per site in average) to ensure that the thermal equilibrium is achieved.

The out-of-plane and in-plane magnetizations are defined as:

$$< m_{\mathrm{z}} > = < \frac{1}{N}\mathop {\sum}_{i = 1}^N {S_i^{\mathrm{z}}} > ,$$
$$< m_{{\mathrm{xy}}} > = < \frac{1}{N}\sqrt {\left( {\mathop {\sum}\nolimits_{i = 1}^N {S_i^{\mathrm{x}}} } \right)^2 + \left( {\mathop {\sum}\nolimits_{i = 1}^N {S_i^{\mathrm{y}}} } \right)^2} > ,$$

where N represents the number of total magnetic moments in the simulated system, and <X> denotes the time average of corresponding components after the system achieves the thermal equilibrium.

In magnetic systems, the static spin-spin correlation function describes the average scalar product of spins at two lattice sites with a fixed distance \(\left| {{\mathbf{r}}_1 - {\mathbf{r}}_2} \right| = r\). It can be written as:

$${\mathrm{C}}\left( {\mathrm{r}} \right) = < {\mathbf{S}}_1\left( {{\mathbf{r}}_1} \right) \cdot {\mathbf{S}}_2\left( {{\mathbf{r}}_2} \right) > /\left| {\mathbf{S}} \right|^2.$$

Data availability

The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.


  1. 1.

    Mermin, N. D. & Wagner, H. Absence of ferromagnetism or antiferromagnetism in one- or two-dimensional isotropic Heisenberg models. Phys. Rev. Lett. 17, 1133–1136 (1966).

    ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Hohenberg, P. C. Existence of long-range order in one and two dimensions. Phys. Rev. 158, 383–386 (1967).

    ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Lado, J. L. & Fernández-Rossier, J. On the origin of magnetic anisotropy in two dimensional CrI3. 2D Mater. 4, 035002 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Kosterlitz, J. M. & Thouless, D. J. Ordering, metastability and phase transitions in two-dimensional systems. J. Phys. C. Solid State Phys. 6, 1181–1203 (1973).

    ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Hellman, F. et al. Interface-induced phenomena in magnetism. Rev. Mod. Phys. 89, 025006 (2017).

    ADS  MathSciNet  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Huang, B. et al. Layer-dependent ferromagnetism in a van der Waals crystal down to the monolayer limit. Nature 546, 270–273 (2017).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Gong, C. et al. Discovery of intrinsic ferromagnetism in two-dimensional van der Waals crystals. Nature 546, 265–269 (2017).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Burch, K. S., Mandrus, D. & Park, J. G. Magnetism in two-dimensional van der Waals materials. Nature 563, 47–52 (2018).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Olsen, T. Theory and simulations of critical temperatures in CrI3 and other 2D materials: easy-axis magnetic order and easy-plane Kosterlitz–Thouless transitions. MRS Commun. 9, 1142–1150 (2019).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Chen, L. et al. Topological spin excitations in honeycomb ferromagnet CrI3. Phys. Rev. X 8, 041028 (2018).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Deng, Y. et al. Gate-tunable room-temperature ferromagnetism in two-dimensional Fe3GeTe2. Nature 563, 94–99 (2018).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Fei, Z. et al. Two-dimensional itinerant ferromagnetism in atomically thin Fe3GeTe2. Nat. Mater. 17, 778–782 (2018).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Gong, Y. et al. Experimental realization of an intrinsic magnetic topological insulator. Chin. Phys. Lett. 36, 076801 (2019).

    ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Otrokov, M. M. et al. Unique thickness-dependent properties of the van der waals interlayer antiferromagnet MnBi2Te4 films. Phys. Rev. Lett. 122, 107202 (2019).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    José, J. V. 40 years of BKT theory, (Workd Scientific, 2013).

  16. 16.

    Mühlbauer, S. et al. Skyrmion lattice in a chiral magnet. Science 323, 915–919 (2009).

    ADS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Yu, X. Z. et al. Real-space observation of a two-dimensional skyrmion crystal. Nature 465, 901–904 (2010).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Shinjo, T. Magnetic vortex core observation in circular dots of permalloy. Science 289, 930–932 (2000).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Tong, Q., Liu, F., Xiao, J. & Yao, W. Skyrmions in the Moiré of van der Waals 2D Magnets. Nano Lett. 18, 7194–7199 (2018).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Wang, W. et al. Spin chirality fluctuation in two-dimensional ferromagnets with perpendicular magnetic anisotropy. Nat. Mater. 18, 1054–1059 (2019).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Han, M.-G. et al. Topological magnetic-spin textures in two-dimensional van der Waals Cr 2 Ge 2 Te 6. Nano Lett. 19, 7859–7865 (2019).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Ezawa, M. Compact merons and skyrmions in thin chiral magnetic films. Phys. Rev. B 83, 100408 (2011).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Phatak, C., Petford-Long, A. K. & Heinonen, O. Direct observation of unconventional topological Spin structure in coupled magnetic discs. Phys. Rev. Lett. 108, 067205 (2012).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Tan, A. et al. Topology of spin meron pairs in coupled Ni/Fe/Co/Cu(001) disks. Phys. Rev. B 94, 014433 (2016).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Chmiel, F. P. et al. Observation of magnetic vortex pairs at room temperature in a planar α-Fe2O3/Co heterostructure. Nat. Mater. 17, 581–585 (2018).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Van Waeyenberge, B. et al. Magnetic vortex core reversal by excitation with short bursts of an alternating field. Nature 444, 461–464 (2006).

    ADS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Yu, X. Z. et al. Transformation between meron and skyrmion topological spin textures in a chiral magnet. Nature 564, 95–98 (2018).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Gao, N. et al. Creation and annihilation of topological meron pairs in in-plane magnetized films. Nat. Commun. 10, 5603 (2019).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Blatter, G., Feigel’man, M. V., Geshkenbein, V. B., Larkin, I. A. & Vinokur, V. M. Vortices in high-temperature superconductors. Rev. Mod. Phys. 66, 1125 (1994).

    ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Zwierlein, M. W., Abo-Shaeer, J. R., Schirotzek, A., Schunck, C. H. & Ketterle, W. Vortices and superfluidity in a strongly interacting Fermi gas. Nature 435, 1047–1051 (2005).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Irkhin, V. & Katanin, A. A. Kosterlitz-thouless and magnetic transition temperatures in layered magnets with a weak easy-plane anisotropy. Phys. Rev. B 60, 2990–2993 (1999).

    ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Jansen, H. J. F. Magnetic anisotropy in density-functional theory. Phys. Rev. B 59, 4699 (1999).

    ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Xue, F., Hou, Y., Wang, Z. & Wu, R. Two-dimensional Ferromagnetic van der Waals CrX3 (X=Cl, Br, I) monolayers with enhanced anisotropy and curie temperature. Phys. Rev. B 100, 224429 (2019).

    ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    Griffiths, R. B. Free energy of interacting magnetic dipoles. Phys. Rev. 176, 655–659 (1968).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    Cai, X. et al. Atomically Thin CrCl3: an in-plane layered antiferromagnetic insulator. Nano Lett. 19, 3993–3998 (2019).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    Klein, D. R. et al. Enhancement of interlayer exchange in an ultrathin two-dimensional magnet. Nat. Phys. 15, 1255–1260 (2019).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. 37.

    Kim, H. H. et al. Evolution of interlayer and intralayer magnetism in three atomically thin chromium trihalides. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. 166, 11131–11136 (2019).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  38. 38.

    Bedoya-Pinto, A. et al. Intrinsic 2D-XY ferromagnetism in a van der Waals monolayer. Preprint at (2020).

  39. 39.

    Liu, J., Sun, Q., Kawazoe, Y. & Jena, P. Exfoliating biocompatible ferromagnetic Cr-trihalide monolayers. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 18, 8777–8784 (2016).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. 40.

    Jiang, P., Li, L., Liao, Z., Zhao, Y. X. & Zhong, Z. Spin direction-controlled electronic band structure in two-dimensional ferromagnetic CrI3. Nano Lett. 18, 3844–3849 (2018).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. 41.

    Lu, X., Fei, R. & Yang, L. Curie temperature of emerging two-dimensional magnetic structures. Phys. Rev. B 100, 205409 (2019).

    ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. 42.

    Pizzochero, M. & Yazyev, O. V. Inducing magnetic phase transitions in monolayer CrI3 via lattice deformations. J. Phys. Chem. C. 124, 7585–7590 (2020).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. 43.

    Sivadas, N., Okamoto, S., Xu, X., Fennie, C. J. & Xiao, D. Stacking-Dependent Magnetism in Bilayer CrI 3. Nano Lett. 18, 7658–7664 (2018).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. 44.

    Pizzochero, M., Yadav, R. & Yazyev, O. V. Magnetic exchange interactions in monolayer CrI3 from many-body wavefunction calculations. 2D Mater. 7, 035005 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  45. 45.

    Torelli, D., Thygesen, K. S. & Olsen, T. High throughput computational screening for 2D ferromagnetic materials: the critical role of anisotropy and local correlations. 2D Mater. 6, 045018 (2019).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  46. 46.

    Hadzibabic, Z., Krüger, P., Cheneau, M., Battelier, B. & Dalibard, J. Berezinskii-Kosterlitz-Thouless crossover in a trapped atomic gas. Nature 441, 1118–1121 (2006).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. 47.

    McCoy, B. M. & Wu, T. T. The Two-Dimensional Ising Model. Encyclopedia of Mathematical Physics, (Harvard University Press, 1973).

  48. 48.

    Park, J. P. & Crowell, P. A. Interactions of spin waves with a magnetic vortex. Phys. Rev. Lett. 95, 167201 (2005).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. 49.

    Wachowiak, A. et al. Direct observation of internal spin structure of magnetic vortex cores. Science 298, 577–580 (2002).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. 50.

    Lobanov, I. S., Jónsson, H. & Uzdin, V. M. Mechanism and activation energy of magnetic skyrmion annihilation obtained from minimum energy path calculations. Phys. Rev. B 94, 174418 (2016).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  51. 51.

    Hertel, R. & Schneider, C. M. Exchange explosions: magnetization dynamics during vortex-antivortex annihilation. Phys. Rev. Lett. 97, 177202 (2006).

    ADS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. 52.

    Actor, A. Classical solutions of SU(2) Yang-Mills theories. Rev. Mod. Phys. 51, 461–525 (1979).

    ADS  MathSciNet  CAS  Google Scholar 

  53. 53.

    Callan, C. G., Dashen, R. & Gross, D. J. Toward a theory of the strong interactions. Phys. Rev. D. 17, 2717–2763 (1978).

    ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  54. 54.

    Yuli, O. et al. Enhancement of the superconducting transition temperature of La2-xSrxCuO4 bilayers: role of pairing and phase stiffness. Phys. Rev. Lett. 101, 057005 (2008).

    ADS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. 55.

    Berciu, M. & John, S. Magnetic structure factor in cuprate superconductors: evidence for charged meron vortices. Phys. Rev. B 69, 224515 (2004).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  56. 56.

    Kim, S. K. Dynamics of bimeron skyrmions in easy-plane magnets induced by a spin supercurrent. Phys. Rev. B 99, 224406 (2019).

    ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  57. 57.

    Zhang, X. et al. Static and dynamic properties of bimerons in a frustrated ferromagnetic monolayer. Phys. Rev. B 101, 144435 (2020).

    ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  58. 58.

    Shen, L. et al. Dynamics of ferromagnetic bimerons driven by spin currents and magnetic fields. Preprint at (2020).

  59. 59.

    Kim, S. K. Dynamics of bimeron skyrmions in easy-plane magnets induced by a spin supercurrent. Phys. Rev. B 99, 224406 (2019).

    ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  60. 60.

    Li, X. et al. The bimeron clusters in chiral antiferromagnets. Preprint at (2020).

  61. 61.

    Maleev, S. Dipole forces in two-dimensional and layered ferromagnets. Sov. J. Exp. Theor. Phys. 43, 1240 (1976).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  62. 62.

    Bruno, P. Spin-wave theory of two-dimensional ferromagnets in the presence of dipolar interactions and magnetocrystalline anisotropy. Phys. Rev. B 43, 6015–6021 (1991).

    ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  63. 63.

    Maier, P. G. & Schwabl, F. Ferromagnetic ordering in the two-dimensional dipolar XY model. Phys. Rev. B 70, 134430 (2004).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  64. 64.

    Mól, L. A. S. & Costa, B. V. Anisotropic Heisenberg model with dipolar interactions: Monte Carlo simulations of the planar-to-paramagnetic phase transition in a bilayer system. Phys. Rev. B 79, 054404 (2009).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  65. 65.

    Bramwell, S. T. & Holdsworth, P. C. W. Magnetization: a characteristic of the KTB transition. Phys. Rev. B 49, 8811–8814 (1994).

    ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  66. 66.

    Rapini, M., Dias, R. A. & Costa, B. V. Phase transition in ultrathin magnetic films with long-range interactions: Monte Carlo simulation of the anisotropic Heisenberg model. Phys. Rev. B 75, 014425 (2007).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  67. 67.

    Kim, K. et al. Suppression of magnetic ordering in XXZ-type antiferromagnetic monolayer NiPS3. Nat. Commun. 10, 345 (2019).

    ADS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  68. 68.

    Kresse, G. & Furthmüller, J. Efficient iterative schemes for ab initio total-energy calculations using a plane-wave basis set. Phys. Rev. B 54, 11169–11186 (1996).

    ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  69. 69.

    Grimme, S. Accurate description of van der Waals complexes by density functional theory including empirical corrections. J. Comput. Chem. 25, 1463–1473 (2004).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  70. 70.

    McGuire, M. A. et al. Magnetic behavior and spin-lattice coupling in cleavable van der Waals layered CrCl3 crystals. Phys. Rev. Mater. 1, 1–10 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

Download references


The work is supported by the Air Force Office of Scientific Research (AFOSR) grant No. FA9550-17-1-0304 and National Science Foundation (NSF) CAREER Grant No. DMR-1455346. The computational resources have been provided by the Stampede of TeraGrid at the Texas Advanced Computing Center (TACC) through XSEDE.

Author information




L.Y. supervised the project. X.L performed the DFT and MC simulations and drafted the paper. All authors discussed the results and edited the paper.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Li Yang.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Peer review information Nature Communications thanks the anonymous reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work.

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Lu, X., Fei, R., Zhu, L. et al. Meron-like topological spin defects in monolayer CrCl3. Nat Commun 11, 4724 (2020).

Download citation


By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.


Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing