Probing magnetism in atomically thin semiconducting PtSe2


Atomic-scale disorder in two-dimensional transition metal dichalcogenides is often accompanied by local magnetic moments, which can conceivably induce long-range magnetic ordering into intrinsically non-magnetic materials. Here, we demonstrate the signature of long-range magnetic orderings in defective mono- and bi-layer semiconducting PtSe2 by performing magnetoresistance measurements under both lateral and vertical measurement configurations. As the material is thinned down from bi- to mono-layer thickness, we observe a ferromagnetic-to-antiferromagnetic crossover, a behavior which is opposite to the one observed in the prototypical 2D magnet CrI3. Our first-principles calculations, supported by aberration-corrected transmission electron microscopy imaging of point defects, associate this transition to the interplay between the defect-induced magnetism and the interlayer interactions in PtSe2. Furthermore, we show that graphene can be effectively used to probe the magnetization of adjacent semiconducting PtSe2. Our findings in an ultimately scaled monolayer system lay the foundation for atom-by-atom engineering of magnetism in otherwise non-magnetic 2D materials.


Two-dimensional (2D) transition metal dichalcogenides (TMDCs)1 are emerging as an appealing class of materials for a wide range of research topics1, including electronics2, spintronics3,4,5,6, and magnetism7,8,9,10. Among this rapidly expanding family of materials, layered platinum diselenide (PtSe2) is a relatively new and interesting member due to its unique thickness-dependent electronic structure11,12,13,14,15,16,17. While multilayer films exhibit metallic character, this crystal undergoes a metal-to-semiconductor transition when thinned down to mono- and bilayers11,12,13. Theoretical work has also indicated that electronic properties of such thin PtSe2 crystal can be further tuned by defect engineering18.

Recent experimental investigations highlighted a broad variety of intrinsic point defects in PtSe219. Even though imperfections are often regarded as detrimental to material properties, in many cases their presence has proven successful in introducing functionalities that would otherwise be absent in pristine materials20,21. This is especially true in the case of metallic PtSe2 multilayers, where surface Pt vacancies trigger a thickness-dependent surface magnetic ordering18,20. The strength of the magnetic exchange coupling across the metallic multilayers is governed by the RKKY interactions. However, thin films of PtSe2 acquire a semiconducting character when approaching the single-layer regime11,13, and the physical picture governing the magnetic exchange interactions in the thinnest films of PtSe2 would rather invoke the direct and superexchange mechanisms, similarly to dilute magnetic semiconductors22. Understanding and controlling the interplay between disorder and magnetism in this ultimate thickness scale can spark unexplored directions for designing 2D semiconducting magnets through defect engineering8. In this Letter, we demonstrate that defect-induced magnetism is preserved in mono and bilayers of semiconducting PtSe2, with a monolayer, surprisingly, showing antiferromagnetic ordering, while bilayer PtSe2 is a ferromagnet.


Device characterization

Our ultra-thin PtSe2 flakes were obtained by mechanical exfoliation from CVT-grown bulk crystals (HQ Graphene), and their thicknesses were determined by atomic force microscopy (AFM). As shown in Fig. 1a, the thickness of a monolayer (bilayer) is found to be ~0.65 nm (~1.2 nm). Next, the mono- or bilayer crystal was transferred onto a monolayer graphene ribbon which was initially deposited onto a Si/SiO2 substrate. Graphene is utilized as a bottom electrode, thereby taking advantage of its electrostatic transparency. This enables gate-tunable vertical and lateral transport operations, as the screening length exceeds its monolayer thickness23. By employing electron-beam lithography and electron-beam evaporation techniques, non-magnetic metallic palladium (Pd) contacts (80-nm thick) were formed on top of PtSe2 and graphene. Further details concerning the device fabrication process are given in “Methods” section. The choice of non-magnetic graphene and Pd contacts rules out any influence of the electrodes on the magnetic response of the device. The schematics of the resulting device geometry is shown in Fig. 1c. This geometry allows us to probe the magnetism in PtSe2 through vertical transport by passing the charge current between electrodes #2 (graphene) and #3 (Pd). In addition, it allows us to characterize the basic transport properties of monolayer PtSe2 by utilizing Pd electrodes #3 and #4 in the lateral measurement geometry. We further compare the magneto-transport properties of isolated graphene as well as the graphene/monolayer PtSe2 heterostructure by relying on electrode pairs #1 & #2 and #2 & #5, respectively. An optical image of the completed device is presented in the bottom panel of Fig. 1c. The transport output was characterized as a function of back-gate voltage (VBG), source-drain bias (VDS), magnetic field, and temperature. Magnetic field-dependent measurements were performed at the base temperature (1.6 K) to maximize the signal-to-noise ratio.

Fig. 1: Device structure and basic characterization.

a AFM images for mono- and bilayer PtSe2 which are utilized as active channel materials in characterized devices. Color scale of the AFM image is 0–5 nm. Following the dashed lines, a height of ~0.65 nm (~1.2 nm) is measured for monolayer (bilayer) PtSe2. Scan size: ~3 µm × 3 µm. b Raw HAADF image of a bilayer PtSe2. Blue and red arrows show the sites with missing Pt and Se atoms, respectively. Scale bar is 1 nm. Bottom panel shows the intensity profile measured along the dashed orange line shown in the STEM image. Blue arrow shows the intensity recorded at the Pt vacancy site. c Top panel: device schematics. A few layer thick PtSe2 with intrinsic defects is transferred on top of monolayer graphene. Both graphene and PtSe2 are contacted with non-magnetic Pd contacts (80-nm thick). Bottom panel: optical image of a completed device. Scale bar is 6 µm. d VBG dependence of IDS measured at fixed temperature values. VDS = 2 V. Inset shows the device schematic. e ln(G) vs T−1/3 measured at different doping levels. Inset shows the temperature dependence of device conductance at different doping values. f Room-temperature VBG dependence of IDS measured at fixed VDS values. Inset compares the VDS dependence of measured off-state conductance for monolayer PtSe2 and WSe2 prepared under the same conditions.

Charge transport in monolayer PtSe2

Prior to magnetic field-dependent measurements, we first assess the basic charge transport properties of monolayer PtSe2. Figure 1d shows the VBG dependence of IDS measured at temperatures covering the 1.6–142 K range, while maintaining a constant VDS = 2 V. While IDS is slightly modulated by the application of VBG due to the semiconducting nature of monolayer PtSe2, the device shows a relatively low on-state conductance (VBG > −5 V). The insulating nature of the crystal is unambiguously confirmed by the observed temperature dependence of the conductivity (σ) measured at fixed carrier concentrations (Fig. 1e-Inset). In the presence of disorder, the electrical transport can be described using the Mott formalism and the variable range hopping (VRH) model which describes the conductivity σ in terms of a characteristic temperature24. The observed linear dependence of the ln(G) on T−1/3 at different given carrier densities (see Fig. 1e and Supplementary Note 1) supports the 2D VRH nature of charge transport up to room temperature (RT). Such a characteristic temperature dependence has been widely observed in many systems, including defective 2D TMDC monolayers25,26,27. In fact, a bandgap of 1.2 eV is expected in monolayer PtSe212 which in turn should result in a stable off state over a large VBG range even at RT. For example, transport characteristics of monolayer black phosophorus28 and multilayer MoSe229, which display comparable bandgap values with monolayer PtSe2, exhibit a stable off-state over 60 V when measured in a back-gate device geometry with an equivalent SiO2 thickness of ~270 nm. As shown in Fig. 1f, the lack of a clear off-state along with a strong dependence of the off-current on VDS at RT signals the hopping nature of charge transport, and, importantly, further suggests the presence of atomic defects in monolayer PtSe227.

Imaging PtSe2 defects using transmission electron microscopy

In order to directly visualize the type of defects in our samples, we relied on Cs-corrected high-resolution transmission electron microscopy imaging. The result obtained from a bilayer PtSe2 with a low accelerating voltage of 80 kV is shown in Fig. 1b. Consistent with early scanning tunneling microscopy investigations19, we observe native Se and Pt vacancies in ultra-thin PtSe2 films. The concentration of Pt vacancy defects is found to be ~9 × 1012 cm−2 (see Supplementary Note 2). Similarly to the bilayer case, we also observe Pt vacancies in monolayers (see Supplementary Note 3).

Magnetoresistance measurement in monolayer PtSe2

After confirming the presence of intrinsic defects in our crystals, we next study the magneto-transport characteristics of our monolayer PtSe2 sandwiched between the source (graphene) and drain (Pd) electrodes (inset of Fig. 2a) by utilizing a vertical measurement geometry. A fixed VDS is applied to PtSe2 while measuring the dependence of device resistance on the applied magnetic field. As shown in Fig. 2a, the IDSVDS curve is nearly linear and symmetric, measured at zero field. As compared to the lateral transport measurement shown in Fig. 1d, the device resistance under vertical geometry is improved by several orders of magnitude, as a result of the reduced transport pathway. Such a highly conductive response obtained along the vertical direction allows us to probe directly the magnetic ordering of monolayer PtSe2. To this end, we sweep the out-of-plane magnetic field from −0.2 to 0.2 T while recording the vertical device resistance at VDS = 10 mV. As clearly seen in Fig. 2b, the evolution of the resistance in our device with the magnetic field substantially departs from the typical localization response. Indeed, it features plateaus with two different values. As the field is increased, the lower plateau observed in the −50 mT < B < 50 mT interval is found to slowly approach the high plateau observed above 150 mT. This two-plateau response is the signature of an antiferromagnetic ground-state ordering20,30,31. While we find a similar two-plateau response in thicker films of PtSe2 (inset of Fig. 2b), the observation of a slow low-to-high plateau switching in monolayer PtSe2 indicates that the magnetic moments are not fully oriented along the out-of-plane direction, with spins that could be slightly canted. Similarly to metallic films, hysteresis in monolayer PtSe2 is almost absent (see Supplementary Note 4). Furthermore, the magnetoresistance (MR) percentage is found to be bias-dependent as in thicker metallic devices and estimated to be 1% in the low-bias regime (Fig. 2c).

Fig. 2: Vertical transport across monolayer PtSe2.

a Bias voltage dependence of IDS. Top inset is the schematic of the measurement geometry. Bottom inset is the differential resistance as a function of applied bias. b Magnetic field dependence of electrical resistance measured at T = 1.6 K. The observation of a two-plateau response indicates the presence of antiferromagnetic ground-state ordering. Inset shows the magneto-transport measurements for a ~7-nm-thick metallic PtSe2. c Bias dependence of the change in device resistance as a result of the magnetic field and corresponding MR percentage. All measurements are taken at 1.6 K. Inset shows the bias dependence of resistance and MR for a ~7-nm-thick metallic PtSe2.

In order to investigate the impact of magnetic ordering in PtSe2 on the transport properties of graphene, we characterize the graphene device resistance with and without PtSe2 on the channel connecting the source and drain electrodes. Figure 3a displays the VBG dependences of corresponding device resistances which show nearly identical device characteristics. However, the magnetic field responses of these junctions present striking differences, as shown in Fig. 3b, c. While the pristine graphene junction exhibits a conventional weak localization response32, the junction with the PtSe2 monolayer exhibits plateaus with two different values20,30,31. This difference in the magneto-transport properties is clearly due to the presence of magnetism in PtSe2 and could be ascribed to two possible origins. One possibility is the back-and-forth hopping of graphene’s electrons through the magnetic defect states in PtSe2 via quantum tunneling, a mechanism similar to the previously reported one in graphene/WS2 heterostructures33. This possibility is indeed supported by the observation of linear IDSVDS relation and the nearly identical shapes of the magnetic response of pure PtSe2 and the graphene/PtSe2 heterostructure, as shown in the inset of Fig. 3c. On the other hand, there could be contribution from the interface-induced magnetism34 by PtSe2.

Fig. 3: Induced magnetization in monolayer graphene.

a VBG dependence of graphene resistance. Red (blue) line represents the device with (without) a monolayer PtSe2 on top of the graphene channel, between the voltage probes. Inset is the schematics of the measurement geometry. b Magnetic field dependence of pristine graphene resistance measured at T = 1.6 K. c Magnetic field dependence of graphene resistance measured at T = 1.6 K for the device with monolayer PtSe2 on the channel. Inset shows the magnetic field response of vertically measured monolayer PtSe2 (red circles) and laterally measured graphene/monolayer PtSe2 (blue circles). They have similar out-of-plane coercive fields. d Magnetic field dependence of graphene resistance measured at T = 1.6 K for the device with a bilayer PtSe2 on the graphene channel. Arrows represent magnetic field sweep directions.

Magnetoresistance measurement in bilayer PtSe2

Finally, we complement our investigation by replacing monolayer PtSe2 with bilayer PtSe2. We observe a hysteresis loop with minima at ±15 mT under backward and forward scans (Fig. 3d), which is the hallmark of ferromagnetism35. The maximum change in the device resistance upon the application of a magnetic field is ~16 Ω and it strongly depends on the applied VDS. The MR percentage probed by graphene is ~0.1% and is nearly independent of the applied VBG (see Supplementary Notes 56). Our findings suggest that monolayer (bilayer) PtSe2 exhibits long-range antiferromagnetic (ferromagnetic) ground-state ordering, and that adjacent graphene electrodes can effectively be used as a sensitive probe to detect such magnetism36. To shed more light on this antiferromagnetic-to-ferromagnetic crossover, measurement techniques such as single-spin microscopy37 can be employed at the nanoscale in future experiments. Such direct measurements would unambiguously determine the types of magnetism and its strength, as recently utilized for another layered magnet37.

Long-range magnetic ordering in semiconductors can be achieved through the incorporation of extrinsic magnetic impurities (e.g., Mn-doped GaAs38 and V-doped WSe239). We rule out this possibility in our work by performing quantitative and qualitative assessment of our samples, which do not show the presence of any chemical elements except for Pt and Se and other crystal phases beside 1 T (see Supplementary Notes 7 and 8). Therefore, our findings constitute a model study demonstrating the purely defect-induced magnetism into an otherwise non-magnetic crystal down to the ultimately scaled monolayer system.

First-principles calculations

We now address the physical mechanism underlying the observed effects from a theoretical perspective. According to a purely ionic argument, Pt atoms exhibit a formal oxidation state of +4 and a resulting valence electron configuration 5d66s0. On the basis of the crystal and ligand fields associated with the octahedral environment in which each Pt atom resides, a splitting of the d orbitals into a pair of empty e2g states and fully occupied t2g states is expected. Such a full occupation of the t2g manifold prevents any intrinsic magnetism in PtSe2 at all possible thicknesses, from monolayer to bulk, as further confirmed by our explicit density-functional calculations. As in the case of metallic PtSe220, we conclude that lattice imperfections are the origin of the observed layer-dependent magnetism in semiconducting PtSe2. Motivated by direct observation of Pt vacancies in our transmission electron microscope images shown in Fig. 1b, their indirect inference from our charge transport measurements as well as earlier scanning tunneling microscopy studies19, we investigate electronic and magnetic properties of mono- and bilayer models of PtSe2 with platinum vacancy defects by means of first-principles calculations. For the monolayer case, we find that a Pt vacancy defect in its fully spin-polarized configuration gives rise to a local magnetic moment of 4.00 μB, which is localized mostly on the six selenium atoms neighboring to the missing Pt atom. We note, however, that the configuration characterized by local magnetic moments in the two Se atomic planes that are oriented antiparallel to each other (Fig. 4a) is 35 meV lower in energy than the former parallel configuration. Below, we will refer to this configuration with zero net magnetic moment as antiferromagnetic. Here, we would like to also note that the Se point defect does not lead to magnetism.

Fig. 4: Localized magnetic moments at Pt vacancy defects in PtSe2.

a Spin-density distribution at the ground-state configuration of the VPt defect in monolayer PtSe2 calculated from first principles. Gray and orange balls represent Pt and Se atoms, respectively. The red and blue isosurfaces correspond to positive and negative spin densities. The position of the missing Pt atom is marked with a dashed circle. The right panel shows the in-plane averaged spin density as a function of the out-of-plane position. The cross (X) indicates the Pt atomic plane at which the vacancy defect is introduced. b Spin-density distribution at the Pt vacancy in the top layer of bilayer PtSe2 calculated from first principles. Units in panels (a) and (b) agree with each other.

Next, we consider the bilayer PtSe2 model with Pt vacancy in one of the two layers. In contrast to the monolayer case discussed above, we could not identify any solution for a defective bilayer other than the ferromagnetic configuration with a net magnetic moment of 1.33 μB (Fig. 4b). This value agrees well with the one obtained for Pt vacancy defects in thicker metallic PtSe2 slabs20. The reason for this traces back to the existence of interlayer coupling between the PtSe2 sheets in the bilayer system. In our previous work20, we have shown that platinum vacancy defects located at the surfaces of multilayer PtSe2 act as magnetic centers, while their presence in the inner regions of the thick samples (as well as in the three-dimensional bulk material) does not lead to any local magnetic moment. This observation clearly pinpoints the pivotal role of interlayer interactions in quenching the defect-induced magnetic response in PtSe2. In bilayer PtSe2, the interlayer coupling affects only one of the two selenium atomic planes. As a result, the defect-induced magnetic moment in this system is reduced (1.33 μB) as compared to the fully polarized magnetic moment of defect in monolayer PtSe2 (4.00 μB), and, remarkably, the spin density primarily resides on the outmost selenium atoms in the defect (Fig. 4b). Overall, our first-principles calculations suggest that a platinum vacancy defect yields an antiferro- (ferro-)magnetic ordering in mono (bi-)layer PtSe2, thereby portraying a theoretical picture in accord with our experimental observations.


Antiferromagnets have been recently considered for sensing and memory applications40. For this purpose, layered intralayer antiferromagnetic compounds such as MnPS3, FePS3, and CoPS3 indeed show promise9. Among these, only a few of them have been exfoliated down to the monolayer. While antiferromagnetic ordering at the monolayer limit still persists in FePS3 with an unchanged transition temperature41, such ordering is suppressed in NiPS342. Unlike FePS3, the observed antiferromagnetic ordering in monolayer PtSe2 is not intrinsic, rather originates from native impurities hosted in the material. Therefore, our work ignites the potential of atomic-scale defects for driving non-magnetic 2D crystals into magnetic phases, thereby opening new directions for expanding the library of two-dimensional magnets43.


Device fabrication

Our device fabrication starts with the mechanical exfoliation of monolayer graphene nanoribbons onto a doped Si substrate with 270 nm of SiO2. PtSe2 crystals are similarly obtained by the mechanical exfoliation from bulk crystals (HQ Graphene) onto a Si/SiO2 wafer. The thickness of selected crystals was determined by using AFM topography imaging (Asylum Research Cypher). PtSe2 was then isolated from its Si/SiO2 substrate with the help of a supporting PMMA layer by etching SiO2 via a diluted potassium hydroxide (KOH) solution (0.7%, ~3 h). This was followed by rinsing the isolated film in deionized (DI) water for several times prior to its transfer onto previously exfoliated graphene nanoribbons. After removing the supporting PMMA via a hot acetone treatment (~90 °C for 1 h) followed by cleaning with IPA. The resulting graphene/PtSe2 heterostructure was annealed at 250 °C for 6 h under high vacuum conditions (~1 × 10−6 mbar) to further remove the transfer-related residues. Metallic contacts were prepared using e-beam lithography (Raith EBPG 5000+, 100 keV thermal field emission gun with an e-beam dose of ~950 µC/cm2) and e-beam evaporation of Pd (Alliance-Concept EVA 760, 80-nm thick). The deposition rate of Pd is 1 Å/s under the base pressure of ~1 × 10−6 mbar.

Transport measurements

Cryogenic measurements were performed in an ICE Oxford liquid helium continuous flow cryo-magnetic system with a base temperature of ~1.5 K. Source-drain currents were measured using a Keithley sourcemeter 2636B, while a Keithley sourcemeter 2400 was used for applying bias through the SiO2 gate dielectric. The source voltage was varying between 0 and 2 V, while the drain was grounded.

Electron microscopy sample preparation and imaging

After the identification of 1–3 layers of PtSe2 on Si/SiO2 substrate using AFM, the substrate was spin-coated with a PMMA A2 polymer (1500 rpm, ~150-nm thick) and baked on a hot plate at 60 °C for 4 min. Then, PMMA surrounding the target PtSe2 was scratched and detached after mildly etching SiO2 using a dilute KOH solution (0.7%, ~30 min). The floating PMMA A2 film was picked up and rinsed several times in DI water. Finally, the film was aligned on Si3N4 TEM grids with the help of a micro-manipulator using a glass nanocapillary. Supporting PMMA film was removed by using the cleaning protocol discussed above. Resulting crystals on TEM grids were annealed at 250 °C for 6 h under high vacuum conditions (~1 × 10−6 mbar) to further remove the transfer-related residues. Here, we note that a very diluted KOH concentration is used to eliminate the unintentional creation of defects in PtSe2. This effective transfer process was previously utilized for the STEM imaging of graphene, MoS2, and WS2 crystals which have extremely low concentration of defects.

Scanning transmission electron microscopy (STEM) imaging experiments were conducted using an aberration-corrected (with double Cs corrector) FEI Titan Themis TEM 60–300 kV, equipped with Schottky X-FEG electron source and a monochromator to reduce the effect of chromatic aberrations. To minimize the effect of electron-beam-induced knock-on damage, a low acceleration voltage (80 kV) was used for all the experiments. The typical electron probe current was 20 pA. Images were acquired with Gatan high annular angular dark-field (HAADF) detector using 185-mm camera length which corresponds to a 49.5–198 mrad collection angle.

TEM simulations

Multislice STEM image simulations were performed using the Dr. Probe software package44. The frozen phonon method was used with 30 variations per pixels and 64 displacements per atom. The resulting sampling rate was ~0.02 nm/pixel. The simulation parameters were chosen to be similar to the experimental conditions. The beam semi-convergence angle and HAADF detector angle was set to 21.2, 49.5–198 mrad, respectively. The source size was chosen to 0.05 nm and all the aberrations were set to zero. The result of STEM image simulation confirms that there is no degradation or structural modification of PtSe2 in the process of transfer (see Supplementary Note 9).

First-principles calculations

Our calculations were performed under the gradient-corrected, spin-orbit inclusive density-functional theory formalism, as implemented in VASP45,46. We treated the exchange and correlation effects at the PBE level47, but additionally verified the robustness of our results against the choice of the density functional (see Supplementary Note 10). The energy cutoff for the plane wave basis set was set to 500 eV. The integration over the Brillouin zone was carried out with the equivalent of 12 × 12 × 1 k-points per unit cell. These parameters were chosen after extensive convergence tests. During the geometry optimizations, the in-plane lattice constants and interlayer spacing for the bilayer systems were constrained to their experimental values of 3.73 and 5.08 Å, respectively, while atomic coordinates were relaxed until each residual component on the Hellmann–Feynman forces was lower than 0.01 eV Å−1. We modeled defective mono and bilayer PtSe2 by introducing a single Pt vacancy defect in an otherwise pristine 4 × 4 supercell containing 48 and 96 atoms, respectively, as such models host a Pt vacancy concentration of 14 × 1012 cm−2, very close to our experimental estimate of ~9 × 1012 cm−2. In Supplementary Note 10, we additionally show that our conclusions are insensitive to the size of the supercell. A vacuum region of 15Å was introduced to separate the periodic images.

Data availability

The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.


  1. 1.

    Manzeli, S., Ovchinnikov, D., Pasquier, D., Yazyev, O. V. & Kis, A. 2D transition metal dichalcogenides. Nat. Rev. Mater. 2, 17033 (2017).

    ADS  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Radisavljevic, B., Radenovic, A., Brivio, J., Giacometti, V. & Kis, A. Single-layer MoS2 transistors. Nat. Nanotechnol. 6, 147–150 (2011).

    ADS  PubMed  Article  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Žutić, I., Fabian, J. & Das Sarma, S. Spintronics: fundamentals and applications. Rev. Mod. Phys. 76, 323–410 (2004).

    ADS  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Han, W., Kawakami, R. K., Gmitra, M. & Fabian, J. Graphene spintronics. Nat. Nanotechnol. 9, 794–807 (2014).

    ADS  PubMed  Article  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Lin, X., Yang, W., Wang, K. L. & Zhao, W. Two-dimensional spintronics for low-power electronics. Nat. Electron 2, 274–283 (2019).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Avsar, A. et al. Colloquium: spintronics in graphene and other two-dimensional materials. Rev. Mod. Phys. 92, 021003 (2020).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Burch, K. S., Mandrus, D. & Park, J.-G. Magnetism in two-dimensional van der Waals materials. Nature 563, 47–52 (2018).

    ADS  PubMed  Article  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Gong, C. & Zhang, X. Two-dimensional magnetic crystals and emergent heterostructure devices. Science 363, eaav4450 (2019).

    PubMed  Article  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Mak, K. F., Shan, J. & Ralph, D. C. Probing and controlling magnetic states in 2D layered magnetic materials. Nat. Rev. Phys. 1, 646–661 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Gibertini, M., Koperski, M., Morpurgo, A. F. & Novoselov, K. S. Magnetic 2D materials and heterostructures. Nat. Nanotechnol. 14, 408–419 (2019).

    ADS  PubMed  Article  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Ciarrocchi, A., Avsar, A., Ovchinnikov, D. & Kis, A. Thickness-modulated metal-to-semiconductor transformation in a transition metal dichalcogenide. Nat. Commun. 9, 919 (2018).

    ADS  PubMed  Article  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Wang, Y. et al. Monolayer PtSe2, a new semiconducting transition-metal-dichalcogenide, epitaxially grown by direct selenization of Pt. Nano Lett. 15, 4013–4018 (2015).

    ADS  PubMed  Article  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Zhao, Y. et al. High-electron-mobility and air-stable 2D layered PtSe2 FETs. Adv. Mater. 29, 1604230 (2017).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Yim, C. et al. High-performance hybrid electronic devices from layered PtSe2 films grown at low temperature. ACS Nano 10, 9550–9558 (2016).

    PubMed  Article  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Yim, C. et al. Electrical devices from top-down structured platinum diselenide films. npj 2D Mater. Appl. 2, 5 (2018).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Miró, P., Ghorbani‐Asl, M. & Heine, T. Two dimensional materials beyond MoS2: noble-transition-metal dichalcogenides. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 53, 3015–3018 (2014).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Kurpas, M. & Fabian, J. Intrinsic and extrinsic spin-orbit coupling and spin relaxation in monolayer PtSe2. (2020).

  18. 18.

    Gao, J. et al. Structure, stability, and kinetics of vacancy defects in monolayer PtSe2: a first-principles study. ACS Omega 2, 8640–8648 (2017).

    PubMed  Article  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Zheng, H. et al. Visualization of point defects in ultrathin layered 1T-PtSe2. 2D Mater. 6, 041005 (2019).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Avsar, A. et al. Defect induced, layer-modulated magnetism in ultrathin metallic PtSe2. Nat. Nanotechnol. 14, 674–678 (2019).

    ADS  PubMed  Article  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Guguchia et al. Magnetism in semiconducting molybdenum dichalcogenides. Sci. Adv. 4, eaat3672 (2018).

    ADS  PubMed  Article  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Furdyna, J. K. Diluted magnetic semiconductors. J. Appl. Phys. 64, R29 (1988).

    ADS  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Avsar, A. et al. Reconfigurable diodes based on vertical WSe2 transistors with van der Waals bonded contacts. Adv. Mater. 30, 1707200 (2018).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Mott, N. F. Conduction in non-crystalline materials. Philos. Mag. 19, 835–852 (1969).

    ADS  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Han, M. Y., Brant, J. C. & Kim, P. Electron transport in disordered graphene nanoribbons. Phys. Rev. Lett. 104, 056801 (2010).

    ADS  PubMed  Article  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Radisavljevic, B. & Kis, A. Mobility engineering and a metal-insulator transition in monolayer MoS2. Nat. Mater. 12, 815–820 (2013).

    ADS  PubMed  Article  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Qiu, H. et al. Hopping transport through defect-induced localized states in molybdenum disulphide. Nat. Commun. 4, 2642 (2013).

    ADS  PubMed  Article  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Cao, Y. et al. Quality heterostructures from two-dimensional crystals unstable in air by their assembly in inert atmosphere. Nano Lett. 15, 4914–4921 (2015).

    ADS  PubMed  Article  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Pradhan, N. R. et al. Ambipolar molybdenum diselenide field-effect transistors: field-effect and hall mobilities. ACS Nano 8, 7923–7929 (2014).

    MathSciNet  PubMed  Article  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Klein, D. R. et al. Probing magnetism in 2D van der Waals crystalline insulators via electron tunneling. Science 360, 1218–1222 (2018).

    ADS  PubMed  Article  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Song, T. et al. Giant tunneling magnetoresistance in spin-filter van der Waals heterostructures. Science 360, 1214–1218 (2018).

    ADS  PubMed  Article  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Tikhonenko, F. V., Horsell, D. W., Gorbachev, R. V. & Savchenko, A. K. Weak localization in graphene flakes. Phys. Rev. Lett. 100, 056802 (2008).

    ADS  PubMed  Article  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Avsar, A. et al. Spin–orbit proximity effect in graphene. Nat. Commun. 5, 4875 (2014).

    ADS  PubMed  Article  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    Žutić, I., Matos-Abiague, A., Scharf, B., Dery, H. & Belashchenko, K. Proximitized materials. Mater. Today 22, 85–107 (2019).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    Leven, B. & Dumpich, G. Resistance behavior and magnetization reversal analysis of individual Co nanowires. Phys. Rev. B 71, 064411 (2005).

    ADS  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    Kim, M. et al. Micromagnetometry of two-dimensional ferromagnets. Nat. Electron 2, 457–463 (2019).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. 37.

    Thiel, L. et al. Probing magnetism in 2D materials at the nanoscale with single-spin microscopy. Science 364, 973–976 (2019).

    ADS  PubMed  Article  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  38. 38.

    Dietl, T. & Ohno, H. Dilute ferromagnetic semiconductors: physics and spintronic structures. Rev. Mod. Phys. 86, 187–251 (2014).

    ADS  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. 39.

    Yun, S. J. et al. Ferromagnetic order at room temperature in monolayer WSe2 semiconductor via vanadium dopant. Adv. Sci. 7, 1903076 (2020).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. 40.

    Jungwirth, T. et al. The multiple directions of antiferromagnetic spintronics. Nat. Phys. 14, 200–203 (2018).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. 41.

    Lee, J.-U. et al. Ising-type magnetic ordering in atomically thin FePS3. Nano Lett. 16, 7433–7438 (2016).

    ADS  PubMed  Article  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  42. 42.

    Kim, K. et al. Suppression of magnetic ordering in XXZ-type antiferromagnetic monolayer NiPS3. Nat. Commun. 10, 345 (2019).

    ADS  PubMed  Article  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  43. 43.

    Cortie, D. L. et al. Two-dimensional magnets: forgotten history and recent progress towards spintronic applications. Adv. Funct. Mater. 30, 1901414 (2019).

  44. 44.

    Barthel, J. Dr. Probe: a software for high-resolution STEM image simulation. Ultramicroscopy 193, 1–11 (2018).

    PubMed  Article  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  45. 45.

    Kresse, G. & Joubert, D. From ultrasoft pseudopotentials to the projector augmented-wave method. Phys. Rev. B 59, 1758–1775 (1999).

    ADS  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  46. 46.

    Kresse, G. & Furthmüller, J. Efficient iterative schemes for ab initio total-energy calculations using a plane-wave basis set. Phys. Rev. B 54, 11169–11186 (1996).

    ADS  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  47. 47.

    Perdew, J. P., Burke, K. & Ernzerhof, M. Generalized gradient approximation made simple. Phys. Rev. Lett. 77, 3865–3868 (1996).

    ADS  PubMed  Article  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references


We acknowledge the help of M. Lihter and A. Radenovic with sharing their recipe for the transfer of exfoliated 2D materials on TEM grids. We also acknowledge the help of N. Gasilova (ISIC) with ICP-MS characterization of PtSe2. We thank Z. Benes (CMI) for the help with electron-beam lithography and the Centre Interdisciplinaire de Microscopie Electronique (CIME) at EPFL for access to electron microscopes as well as R. Zamani for technical assistance with TEM imaging. A.A., C-Y.C., M.T., A.C., and A.K. would like to acknowledge support by the European Research Council (ERC, Grant 682332), Swiss National Science Foundation (Grant 175822), and Marie Curie-Sklodowska COFUND (grant 665667). A.K. acknowledges funding from the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation program under grant agreements No. 785219 and 881603 (Graphene Flagship). M.P. and O.V.Y. acknowledge support by the Swiss National Science Foundation (Grant 172543). First-principles calculations have been carried out at the Swiss National Supercomputing Centre (CSCS) under the projects s832 and s1008.

Author information




A.A. and A.K. designed the experiments. A.A., C-Y.C., and A.C. fabricated the samples and performed transport measurements. M.T. performed TEM imaging and simulations. M.P. and O.V.Y. devised models and performed first-principles calculations. A.A., M.P., and A.K. wrote the paper with input from all authors.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Ahmet Avsar or Andras Kis.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Peer review information Nature Communications thanks Guido Menichetti and the other, anonymous, reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work.

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Avsar, A., Cheon, CY., Pizzochero, M. et al. Probing magnetism in atomically thin semiconducting PtSe2. Nat Commun 11, 4806 (2020).

Download citation


By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.


Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing